系统生物学和合成生物学研究在生物燃料生产菌株改造中的应用

基于生物质资源生产环境友好的生物燃料,对经济和社会的可持续发展具有重要意义,但其生产成本高的问题十分突出,而高效生产菌株的获得是解决这一问题的根本出路。以下综述了利用系统生物学研究所获得的信息进行菌种改造的过程,重点论述了生产菌株胁迫耐受性方面的研究进展,并讨论了系统生物学、合成生物学和代谢工程技术在改造生物燃料生产菌株中的应用,展望了合成生物学在构建高效生物能源生产菌株方面应用的前景。     

发根土壤杆菌在植物次生代谢物生产中的应用与进展

发根土壤杆菌 (Agrobacteriumrhizogenes)是一类极具应用前景的微生物资源 ,就发根土壤杆菌Ri质粒结构、功能、侵染和致病过程及其宿主、转化体特性进行了概述 ,并详细讨论了发根土壤杆菌在生产植物次级代谢产物方面的应用与进展及相关影响因素 ,同时还简单介绍了工业化生产的培养方法、生物反应器种类及存在的问题与困难。     

植物组织培养方法生产药用次生代谢产物研究进展

许多药物来源于植物次生代谢途径,目前植物组织培养方法已成为生产药用成分的重要手段.在植物组织培养中,选择高产的外植体,寻找合适的培养条件,运用两相培养法和毛状根培养技术以及控制组织培养过程中的污染、褐化及玻璃化等问题,则是提高植物细胞生长速度和次生代谢产物产量并实现工业化生产的先决条件.本文主要从以上几个方面介绍其近来的研究进展,并提出了存在的问题及解决对策.     

芽胞杆菌属产α-淀粉酶的研究进展

α-淀粉酶是一种重要的淀粉水解酶,可以从动物、植物或微生物中获得。但应用于工业生产的α-淀粉酶绝大多数来自芽胞杆菌。自α-淀粉酶工业化生产以来,研究人员针对其生产菌株芽胞杆菌进行了一系列的诱变选育和基因工程等分子生物学育种,使得菌种的产酶能力不断得到提高。另外,优化芽胞杆菌发酵培养基及发酵参数也是提高α-淀粉酶工业化生产产量的重要方法。     

天蚕素AD在毕赤酵母中的多拷贝整合表达及表达条件优化

【背景】天蚕素抗菌肽是目前研究最清楚、效果最显著的抗菌肽,实现工业化生产为其在农业、养殖业中的应用奠定了基础。【目的】获得一株高效生产天蚕素AD的基因工程菌株。【方法】构建重组载体pGAPZαA-CAD通过电击转化至PichiapastorisX33中,表达天蚕素AD基因并获得X33/GCAD菌株;构建重组载体pUCGAP-CAD导入至X33/GCAD菌株中。pGAPZαA-CAD是以博来霉素为抗性筛选标签被整合到P. pastoris X33的GAPDH启动子区域,pUCGAP-CAD是以遗传霉素为抗性筛选标签被整合到P. pastoris X33的非翻译rDNA区域,最终获得一株高效表达天蚕素AD的酵母菌株X33/GUCAD。【结果】通过质谱分析鉴定X33/GUCAD表达的抑菌物质为天蚕素AD,通过发酵条件的优化,表明X33/GUCAD菌株在以甘油为碳源和以蛋白胨、酵母提取物为有机氮源的情况下具有较强表达天蚕素AD的能力。【结论】较高的拷贝数更有利于提高天蚕素AD的产量,此工程菌株在后期发酵过程中稳定性较好,适于工业化生产。     

褐藻生物乙醇的研究进展

利用大型褐藻转化生产的第三代燃料乙醇已受到研究者的广泛关注。我国拥有丰富的褐藻资源,具备了褐藻生物乙醇转化的有利条件。为了实现工业化生产,还需要通过筛选分离和基因工程手段获得高效发酵褐藻的优良菌株及优化预处理、发酵条件等。主要介绍了我国褐藻资源概况、预处理方法和微生物发酵褐藻不同组分生产乙醇的研究进展,提出了当前褐藻乙醇转化中存在的问题,展望了褐藻乙醇的发展方向。     

放线菌工业菌种选育、过程优化与放大研究进展

放线菌属由于能够产生一系列结构复杂的生物活性物质而受到广泛关注, 这些活性代谢产物的大规模发酵生产在医药、农业等领域的应用中起着重要的作用。本文综述了近年来放线菌次级代谢产物产业化研究的一些新进展, 包括菌株的改造、生物过程优化和控制以及发酵放大技术, 并对这些方法和技术进行了讨论。     

高级醇的微生物绿色制造

高级醇是含有两个以上碳原子的醇类,具有比乙醇更优秀的燃料性能,是化石燃料的重要补充与替代品.利用微生物以可再生的生物质为原料进行高级醇的生产可同时缓解当前的能源与环境危机,已成为绿色生物制造的重大发展方向.天然的微生物仅能少量生产个别种类的高级醇,因此,通过代谢工程及合成生物学技术,在模式工业菌株中重构高级醇的合成途径...     

海藻糖生产菌株筛选过程中产物鉴定的研究

在海藻糖生产菌的筛选过程中,微生物胞内酶转化淀粉生成的产物复杂,将产物逐一纯化是非常烦琐的,但又必须确证产物中是否含有海藻糖。本文将薄层层析、高效液相电喷雾电离质谱联用及核磁共振等分析手段综合应用于海藻糖生产菌株的筛选,在酶反应产物不必被纯化的前提下,准确、快捷地鉴定了酶反应产物中的未知糖组分,最终证明食尼古丁节杆菌（Arthrobacter nicotinovorus）D97利用淀粉或麦芽寡糖的酶反应产物中含有海藻糖。该方法在筛选海藻糖及其它功能性葡二糖生产菌株时较为严密。     

一株高产木聚糖酶的枝链霉菌的分离鉴定及产酶

对1株高产木聚糖酶的链霉菌进行了鉴定并研究其木聚糖酶的生产过程及水解产物特点。分离得到1株产木聚糖酶的链霉菌Streptomyces sp.L2001,从形态学特征、培养特征和生理生化特征等方面对该菌株进行了鉴定。PCR扩增得到16S rDNA序列全长为1429bp,分析结果表明,菌株与Streptomyces rameus NBRC3782同源性达99.16%。结合传统生理生化实验结果鉴定为枝链霉菌。菌株液体发酵6d能产生842.0U/mL木聚糖酶活力。经HPLC分析酶解产物,结果显示木二糖、木三糖及木四糖含量之和高达93.5%,该酶适用于工业化生产低聚木糖。     

微生物耐受乙醇与丁醇机制及其在生物燃料生产与生物转化中的应用

生物法获取乙醇与丁醇过程中有机溶剂的毒性是生产菌重要环境胁迫因素之一,且当有机溶剂超过一定浓度时便会抑制微生物的生长,甚至引起微生物的死亡,因此提高工业微生物的有机溶剂耐受性对工业生产具有重要的意义。对微生物乙醇及丁醇耐受机制的研究可为选育具有较强溶剂耐受菌提供理论基础。本文系统介绍了微生物耐受乙醇与丁醇的机制,并对其在生物燃料生产及生物转化中面临的机遇与挑战等问题进行简要的评述。     

Recent progress on industrial fermentative production of acetone–butanol–ethanol by Clostridium acetobutylicum in China

China is one of the few countries, which maintained the fermentative acetone–butanol–ethanol (ABE) production for several decades. Until the end of the last century, the ABE fermentation from grain was operated in a few industrial scale plants. Due to the strong competition from the petrochemical industries, the fermentative ABE production lost its position in the 1990s, when all the solvent fermentation plants in China were closed. Under the current circumstances of concern about energy limitations and environmental pollution, new opportunities have emerged for the traditional ABE fermentation industry since it could again be potentially competitive with chemical synthesis. From 2006, several ABE fermentation plants in China have resumed production. The total solvent (acetone, butanol, and ethanol) production capacity from ten plants reached 210,000 tons, and the total solvent production is expected to be extended to 1,000,000 tons (based on the available data as of Sept. 2008). This article reviews current work in strain development, the continuous fermentation process, solvent recovery, and economic evaluation of ABE process in China. Challenges for an economically competitive ABE process in the future are also discussed.     

Current progress on engineering microbial strains and consortia for production of cellulosic butanol through consolidated bioprocessing

In the last decades, fermentative production of n-butanol has regained substantial interest mainly owing to its use as drop-in-fuel. The use of lignocellulose as an alternative to traditional acetone–butanol–ethanol fermentation feedstocks (starchy biomass and molasses) can significantly increase the economic competitiveness of biobutanol over production from non-renewable sources (petroleum). However, the low cost of lignocellulose is offset by its high recalcitrance to biodegradation which generally requires chemical-physical pre-treatment and multiple bioreactor-based processes. The development of consolidated processing (i.e., single-pot fermentation) can dramatically reduce lignocellulose fermentation costs and promote its industrial application. Here, strategies for developing microbial strains and consortia that feature both efficient (hemi)cellulose depolymerization and butanol production will be depicted, that is, rational metabolic engineering of native (hemi)cellulolytic or native butanol-producing or other suitable microorganisms; protoplast fusion of (hemi)cellulolytic and butanol-producing strains; and co-culture of (hemi)cellulolytic and butanol-producing microbes. Irrespective of the fermentation feedstock, biobutanol production is inherently limited by the severe toxicity of this solvent that challenges process economic viability. Hence, an overview of strategies for developing butanol hypertolerant strains will be provided.     

Prospective and development of butanol as an advanced biofuel

Butanol has been acknowledged as an advanced biofuel, but its production through acetone–butanol–ethanol (ABE) fermentation by clostridia is still not economically competitive, due to low butanol yield and titer. In this article, update progress in butanol production is reviewed. Low price and sustainable feedstocks such as lignocellulosic residues and dedicated energy crops are needed for butanol production at large scale to save feedstock cost, but processes are more complicated, compared to those established for ABE fermentation from sugar- and starch-based feedstocks. While rational designs targeting individual genes, enzymes or pathways are effective for improving butanol yield, global and systems strategies are more reasonable for engineering strains with stress tolerance controlled by multigenes. Compared to solvent-producing clostridia, engineering heterologous species such as Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae with butanol pathway might be a solution for eliminating the formation of major byproducts acetone and ethanol so that butanol yield can be improved significantly. Although batch fermentation has been practiced for butanol production in industry, continuous operation is more productive for large scale production of butanol as a biofuel, but a single chemostat bioreactor cannot achieve this goal for the biphasic ABE fermentation, and tanks-in-series systems should be optimized for alternative feedstocks and new strains. Moreover, energy saving is limited for the distillation system, even total solvents in the fermentation broth are increased significantly, since solvents are distilled to ~ 40% by the beer stripper, and more than 95% water is removed with the stillage without phase change, even with conventional distillation systems, needless to say that advanced chemical engineering technologies can distil solvents up to ~ 90% with the beer stripper, and the multistage pressure columns can well balance energy consumption for solvent fraction. Indeed, an increase in butanol titer with ABE fermentation can significantly save energy consumption for medium sterilization and stillage treatment, since concentrated medium can be used, and consequently total mass flow with production systems can be reduced. As for various in situ butanol removal technologies, their energy efficiency, capital investment and contamination risk to the fermentation process need to be evaluated carefully.     

Characterization of recombinant strains of the Clostridium acetobutylicum butyrate kinase inactivation mutant: need for new phenomenological models for solventogenesis and butanol inhibition?

Two metabolic engineering tools, namely gene inactivation and gene overexpression, were employed to examine the effects of two genetic modifications on the fermentation characteristics of Clostridium acetobutylicum. Inactivation of the butyrate kinase gene (buk) was examined using strain PJC4BK, while the combined effect of buk inactivation and overexpression of the aad gene-encoding the alcohol aldehyde dehydrogense (AAD) used in butanol formation-was examined using strain PJC4BK(pTAAD). The two strains were characterized in controlled pH > or = 5.0 fermentations, and by a recently enhanced method of metabolic flux analysis. Strain PJC4BK was previously genetically characterized, and fermentation experiments at pH > or = 5.5 demonstrated good, but not exceptional, solvent-production capabilities. Here, we show that this strain is a solvent superproducer in pH > or = 5.0 fermentations producing 225 mM (16.7 g/L) of butanol, 76 mM of acetone (4.4 g/L), and 57 mM (2.6 g/L) of ethanol. Strain PJC4BK(pTAAD) produced similar amounts of butanol and acetone but 98 mM (4.5 g/L) of ethanol. Both strains overcame the 180 mM (13 g/L) butanol toxicity limit, without any selection for butanol tolerance. Work with strain PJC4BK(pTAAD) is the first reported use of dual antibiotic selection in C. acetobutylicum. One antibiotic was used for selection of strain PJC4BK while the second antibiotic selected for the pTAAD presence. Overexpression of aad from pTAAD resulted in increased ethanol production but did not increase butanol titers, thus indicating that AAD did not limit butanol production under these fermentation conditions. Metabolic flux analysis showed a decrease in butyrate formation fluxes by up to 75% and an increase in acetate formation fluxes of up to 100% during early growth. The mean specific butanol and ethanol formation fluxes increased significantly in these recombinant strains, up to 300% and 400%, respectively. Onset of solvent production occurred during the exponential-growth phase when the culture optical density was very low and when total and undissociated butyric acid levels were <1 mM. Butyrate levels were low throughout all fermentations, never exceeding 20 mM. Thus, threshold butyrate concentrations are not necessary for solvent production in these stains, suggesting the need for a new phenomenological model to explain solvent formation.     

Screening and characterization of butanol‐tolerant micro‐organisms

Aims: Poor butanol tolerance of solventogenic stains directly limits their butanol production during industrial‐scale fermentation process. This study was performed to search for micro‐organisms possessing elevated tolerance to butanol. Methods and Results: Two strains, which displayed higher butanol tolerance compared to commonly used solventogenic Clostridium acetobutylicum, were isolated by evolution and screening strategies. Both strains were identified as lactic acid bacteria (LAB). On this basis, a LAB culture collection was tested for butanol tolerance, and 60% of the strains could grow at a butanol concentration of 2·5% (v/v). In addition, an isolated strain with superior butanol tolerance was transformed using a certain plasmid. Conclusions: The results indicate that many strains of LAB possessed inherent tolerance of butanol. Significance and Impact of the Study: This study suggests that LAB strains may be capable of producing butanol to elevated levels following suitable genetic manipulation.     

Biobutanol: an attractive biofuel

Biofuels are an attractive means to prevent a further increase of carbon dioxide emissions. Currently, gasoline is blended with ethanol at various percentages. However, butanol has several advantages over ethanol, such as higher energy content, lower water absorption, better blending ability, and use in conventional combustion engines without modification. Like ethanol, it can be produced fermentatively or petrochemically. Current crude oil prices render the biotechnological process economic again. The best-studied bacterium to perform a butanol fermentation is Clostridium acetobutylicum. Its genome has been sequenced, and the regulation of solvent formation is under intensive investigation. This opens the possibility to engineer recombinant strains with superior biobutanol-producing ability.     

Fermentative butanol production by Clostridia

Butanol is an aliphatic saturated alcohol having the molecular formula of C(4)H(9)OH. Butanol can be used as an intermediate in chemical synthesis and as a solvent for a wide variety of chemical and textile industry applications. Moreover, butanol has been considered as a potential fuel or fuel additive. Biological production of butanol (with acetone and ethanol) was one of the largest industrial fermentation processes early in the 20th century. However, fermentative production of butanol had lost its competitiveness by 1960s due to increasing substrate costs and the advent of more efficient petrochemical processes. Recently, increasing demand for the use of renewable resources as feedstock for the production of chemicals combined with advances in biotechnology through omics, systems biology, metabolic engineering and innovative process developments is generating a renewed interest in fermentative butanol production. This article reviews biotechnological production of butanol by clostridia and some relevant fermentation and downstream processes. The strategies for strain improvement by metabolic engineering and further requirements to make fermentative butanol production a successful industrial process are also discussed.     

Problems with the microbial production of butanol

With the incessant fluctuations in oil prices and increasing stress from environmental pollution, renewed attention is being paid to the microbial production of biofuels from renewable sources. As a gasoline substitute, butanol has advantages over traditional fuel ethanol in terms of energy density and hygroscopicity. A variety of cheap substrates have been successfully applied in the production of biobutanol, highlighting the commercial potential of biobutanol development. In this review, in order to better understand the process of acetone–butanol–ethanol production, traditional clostridia fermentation is discussed. Sporulation is probably induced by solvent formation, and the molecular mechanism leading to the initiation of sporulation and solventogenesis is also investigated. Different strategies are employed in the metabolic engineering of clostridia that aim to enhancing solvent production, improve selectivity for butanol production, and increase the tolerance of clostridia to solvents. However, it will be hard to make breakthroughs in the metabolic engineering of clostridia for butanol production without gaining a deeper understanding of the genetic background of clostridia and developing more efficient genetic tools for clostridia. Therefore, increasing attention has been paid to the metabolic engineering of E. coli for butanol production. The importation and expression of a non-clostridial butanol-producing pathway in E. coli is probably the most promising strategy for butanol biosynthesis. Due to the lower butanol titers in the fermentation broth, simultaneous fermentation and product removal techniques have been developed to reduce the cost of butanol recovery. Gas stripping is the best technique for butanol recovery found so far.     

Economical challenges to microbial producers of butanol: feedstock, butanol ratio and titer

Butanol is an important solvent and transport fuel additive, and can be produced by microbial fermentation. Attempts to generate a superior microbial producer of butanol have been made through different metabolic engineering strategies. However, to date, butanol bio-production is still not economically competitive compared to petrochemical-derived production because of its major drawbacks, such as, high cost of the feedstocks, low butanol concentration in the fermentation broth and the co-production of low-value by-products acetone and ethanol. Here we analyze the main bottlenecks in microbial butanol production and summarize relevant advances from recently reported studies. Further needs and directions for developing real industrially applicable strains in butanol production are also discussed.