Founder cell specification

Lateral organs arise from individual or groups of cells either on the flanks of meristems or within defined cellular positional contexts. The first event in organogenesis is founder cell specification. Auxin is one necessary signal in different organ specification contexts, but it is difficult to distinguish between correlative and causal signals and evidence is emerging that other signals exist and that the interplay between these signals is important for organ initiation. This review analyses the progress in understanding which signals contribute to founder cell specification and outlines the emerging complexities in the perception of positional information that are context-dependent and reliant on the establishment and coordination of different types of competencies.     

Evolvability Is Inevitable: Increasing Evolvability without the Pressure to Adapt

Why evolvability appears to have increased over evolutionary time is an important unresolved biological question. Unlike most candidate explanations, this paper proposes that increasing evolvability can result without any pressure to adapt. The insight is that if evolvability is heritable, then an unbiased drifting process across genotypes can still create a distribution of phenotypes biased towards evolvability, because evolvable organisms diffuse more quickly through the space of possible phenotypes. Furthermore, because phenotypic divergence often correlates with founding niches, niche founders may on average be more evolvable, which through population growth provides a genotypic bias towards evolvability. Interestingly, the combination of these two mechanisms can lead to increasing evolvability without any pressure to out-compete other organisms, as demonstrated through experiments with a series of simulated models. Thus rather than from pressure to adapt, evolvability may inevitably result from any drift through genotypic space combined with evolution''s passive tendency to accumulate niches.     

Epigenetic mechanisms regulating fate specification of neural stem cells

Neural stem cells (NSCs) possess the ability to self-renew and to differentiate along neuronal and glial lineages. These processes are defined by the dynamic interplay between extracellular cues including cytokine signalling and intracellular programmes such as epigenetic modification. There is increasing evidence that epigenetic mechanisms involving, for example, changes in DNA methylation, histone modification and non-coding RNA expression are closely associated with fate specification of NSCs. These epigenetic alterations could provide coordinated systems for regulating gene expression at each step of neural cell differentiation. Here we review the roles of epigenetics in neural fate specification in the mammalian central nervous system.     

Signalling in cell type specification.

Positional information is an important determinant in the establishment of cellular identity in plants. It is established during pattern formation and is maintained in growing organs. Cells maintain the ability to respond to changes in positional information during development indicating that the mechanism for perceiving such information must remain intact until relatively late in development. Once positional cues are perceived they set in motion a number of cascades resulting in the differentiation of particular cell types in defined locations. The circuitry underpinning these later events is being teased out using genetics. Evidence is emerging for the existence of an array of both positive and negative genetic regulators from studies in a number of diverse plant model systems Copyright 1999 Academic Press.     

Coming to Grips with Evolvability

To explain the evolution of complex organisms by random mutation, drift, and selection is not a trivial task. This becomes obvious if we imagine an organism in which most genes affect most traits and all mutations are immediately expressed in the phenotype. Most of the mutations will be deleterious. Computer programmers experienced a similar problem when trying to evolve computer programs by introducing random changes to a conventional computer code, realizing that almost all random changes are “lethal.” Everyone who has done any programming knows that conventional computer languages are very brittle! Real organisms are not organized in this way but rather involve mediation between the genes and the phenotypic traits, namely development, also sometimes called the genotype–phenotype map. This map of genetic effects is structured in a way that enables evolvability, that is, enhances the probability that mutations will improve the performance of the organism. Here we outline two properties of organismal development, namely modularity and robustness. Modularity refers to the situation in which genes affect a restricted number of functionally related phenotypic characters. Robustness describes a situation in which cryptic mutations can accumulate without effect on fitness but can become visible to selection in a new environment or genetic background. We discuss recent empirical evidence in support of both phenomena and their effect on evolvability and also briefly address their evolution.     

Heritability is not Evolvability

Short-term evolutionary potential depends on the additive genetic variance in the population. The additive variance is often measured as heritability, the fraction of the total phenotypic variance that is additive. Heritability is thus a common measure of evolutionary potential. An alternative is to measure evolutionary potential as expected proportional change under a unit strength of selection. This yields the mean-scaled additive variance as a measure of evolvability. Houle in Genetics 130:195–204, (1992) showed that these two ways of scaling additive variance are often inconsistent and can lead to different conclusions as to what traits are more evolvable. Here, we explore this relation in more detail through a literature review, and through theoretical arguments. We show that the correlation between heritability and evolvability is essentially zero, and we argue that this is likely due to inherent positive correlations between the additive variance and other components of phenotypic variance. This means that heritabilities are unsuitable as measures of evolutionary potential in natural populations. More generally we argue that scaling always involves non-trivial assumptions, and that a lack of awareness of these assumptions constitutes a systemic error in the field of evolutionary biology.     

Male germ cell specification and differentiation

Understanding the mechanisms by which the germline is induced and maintained should lead to a broader understanding of the means by which pluripotency is acquired and maintained. In this review, two major aspects of male germ cell development are discussed: underlying mechanisms for induction and maintenance of primordial germ cells and the basic signaling pathways that determine spermatogonial cell fate.     

Regulation of intestinal stem cell fate specification

The remarkable ability of rapid self-renewal makes the intestinal epithelium an ideal model for the study of adult stem cells. The intestinal epithelium is organized into villus and crypt, and a group of intestinal stem cells located at the base of crypt are responsible for this constant self-renewal throughout the life. Identification of the intestinal stem cell marker Lgr5, isolation and in vitro culture of Lgr5+ intestinal stem cells and the use of transgenic mouse models have significantly facilitated the studies of intestinal stem cell homeostasis and differentiation, therefore greatly expanding our knowledge of the regulatory mechanisms underlying the intestinal stem cell fate determination. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of how signals of Wnt, BMP, Notch and EGF in the stem cell niche modulate the intestinal stem cell fate.     

Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification

Microenvironments appear important in stem cell lineage specification but can be difficult to adequately characterize or control with soft tissues. Naive mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) are shown here to specify lineage and commit to phenotypes with extreme sensitivity to tissue-level elasticity. Soft matrices that mimic brain are neurogenic, stiffer matrices that mimic muscle are myogenic, and comparatively rigid matrices that mimic collagenous bone prove osteogenic. During the initial week in culture, reprogramming of these lineages is possible with addition of soluble induction factors, but after several weeks in culture, the cells commit to the lineage specified by matrix elasticity, consistent with the elasticity-insensitive commitment of differentiated cell types. Inhibition of nonmuscle myosin II blocks all elasticity-directed lineage specification-without strongly perturbing many other aspects of cell function and shape. The results have significant implications for understanding physical effects of the in vivo microenvironment and also for therapeutic uses of stem cells.     

Epigenetic control of cell specification during female gametogenesis

In flowering plants, the formation of gametes depends on the differentiation of cellular precursors that divide meiotically before giving rise to a multicellular gametophyte. The establishment of this gametophytic phase presents an opportunity for natural selection to act on the haploid plant genome by means of epigenetic mechanisms that ensure a tight regulation of plant reproductive development. Despite this early acting selective pressure, there are numerous examples of naturally occurring developmental alternatives that suggest a flexible regulatory control of cell specification and subsequent gamete formation in flowering plants. In this review, we discuss recent findings indicating that epigenetic mechanisms related to the activity of small RNA pathways prevailing during ovule formation play an essential role in cell specification and genome integrity. We also compare these findings to small RNA pathways acting during gametogenesis in animals and discuss their implications for the understanding of the mechanisms that control the establishment of the female gametophytic lineage during both sexual reproduction and apomixis.     

Reproductive cell specification during Volvox obversus development

Asexual spheroids of the genus Volvox contain only two cell types: flagellated somatic cells and immotile asexual reproductive cells known as gonidia. During each round of embryogenesis in Volvox obversus, eight large gonidial precursors are produced at the anterior extremity of the embryo. These cells arise as a consequence of polarized, asymmetric divisions of the anteriormost blastomeres at the fourth through nine cleavage cycles, while all other blastomeres cleave symmetrically to yield somatic cell precursors. Blastomeres isolated from embryos at any point between the 2-cell and the 32-cell stage cleaved in the normal pattern and produced the same complement and spatial distribution of cell types as they would have in an intact embryo. This result indicates that intrinsic features control the cleavage patterns and developmental potentials of blastomeres, and rules out any significant role for cell-cell interactions in gonidial specification. When substantial quantities of anterolateral cytoplasm were deleted from uncleaved gonidia or 4-cell stage blastomeres, the cell fragments frequently regulated and embryos were produced with the expected number of asymmetrically cleaving cells and gonidial precursors at their anterior ends. However, when anterior cytoplasm was deleted from 8-cell stage blastomeres, the depleted cells frequently failed to cleave asymmetrically and produced no gonidial precursors. Furthermore, when compression was used to reorient cleavage planes at the fourth division cycle, so that anterior cytoplasm was transmitted to more than the normal number of cells, those cells receiving a significant amount of such cytoplasm cleaved asymmetrically to produce supernumerary gonidial precursors. Together, these last two experiments indicate that blastomeres in the V. obversus embryo acquire (at least by the end of the third cleavage cycle) a polarized organization in which anterior cytoplasm plays a causal role in the process of reproductive-cell specification.