Translokin (Cep57) interacts with cyclin D1 and prevents its nuclear accumulation in quiescent fibroblasts

Nuclear accumulation of cyclin D1 because of altered trafficking or degradation is thought to contribute directly to neoplastic transformation and growth. Mechanisms of cyclin D1 localization in S phase have been studied in detail, but its control during exit from the cell cycle and quiescence is poorly understood. Here we report that translokin (Tlk), a microtubule-associated protein also termed Cep57, interacts with cyclin D1 and controls its nucleocytoplasmic distribution in quiescent cells. Tlk binds to regions of cyclin D1 also involved in binding to cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (Cdk4), and a fraction of cyclin D1 associates to the juxtanuclear Tlk network in the cell. Downregulation of Tlk levels results in undue nuclear accumulation of cyclin D1 and increased Cdk4-dependent phosphorylation of pRB under quiescence conditions. In turn, overexpression of Tlk prevents proper cyclin D1 accumulation in the nucleus of proliferating cells in an interaction-dependent manner, inhibits Cdk4-dependent phosphorylation of pRB and hinders cell cycle progression to S phase. We propose that the Tlk acts as a key negative regulator in the pathway that drives nuclear import of cyclin D1, thus contributing to prevent pRB inactivation and to maintain cellular quiescence.     

A dominant-negative cyclin D1 mutant prevents nuclear import of cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (CDK4) and its phosphorylation by CDK-activating kinase.

Cyclins contain two characteristic cyclin folds, each consisting of five alpha-helical bundles, which are connected to one another by a short linker peptide. The first repeat makes direct contact with cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) subunits in assembled holoenzyme complexes, whereas the second does not contribute directly to the CDK interface. Although threonine 156 in mouse cyclin D1 is predicted to lie at the carboxyl terminus of the linker peptide that separates the two cyclin folds and is buried within the cyclin subunit, mutation of this residue to alanine has profound effects on the behavior of the derived cyclin D1-CDK4 complexes. CDK4 in complexes with mutant cyclin D1 (T156A or T156E but not T156S) is not phosphorylated by recombinant CDK-activating kinase (CAK) in vitro, fails to undergo activating T-loop phosphorylation in vivo, and remains catalytically inactive and unable to phosphorylate the retinoblastoma protein. Moreover, when it is ectopically overexpressed in mammalian cells, cyclin D1 (T156A) assembles with CDK4 in the cytoplasm but is not imported into the cell nucleus. CAK phosphorylation is not required for nuclear transport of cyclin D1-CDK4 complexes, because complexes containing wild-type cyclin D1 and a CDK4 (T172A) mutant lacking the CAK phosphorylation site are efficiently imported. In contrast, enforced overexpression of the CDK inhibitor p21Cip1 together with mutant cyclin D1 (T156A)-CDK4 complexes enhanced their nuclear localization. These results suggest that cyclin D1 (T156A or T156E) forms abortive complexes with CDK4 that prevent recognition by CAK and by other cellular factors that are required for their nuclear localization. These properties enable ectopically overexpressed cyclin D1 (T156A), or a more stable T156A/T286A double mutant that is resistant to ubiquitination, to compete with endogenous cyclin D1 in mammalian cells, thereby mobilizing CDK4 into cytoplasmic, catalytically inactive complexes and dominantly inhibiting the ability of transfected NIH 3T3 fibroblasts to enter S phase.     

Restraining CDK1–cyclin B activation: PP2A on the cUSP(7)

USP7 inhibitors are gaining momentum as a therapeutic strategy to stabilize p53 through their ability to induce MDM2 degradation. However, these inhibitors come with an unexpected p53‐independent toxicity, via an unknown mechanism. In this issue of The EMBO Journal, Galarreta et al report how inhibition of USP7 leads to re‐distribution of PP2A from cytoplasm to nucleus and an increase of deleterious CDK1‐dependent phosphorylation throughout the cell cycle, revealing a new regulatory mechanism for the progression of S‐phase cells toward mitosis to maintain genomic integrity.Subject Categories: Cell Cycle, Post-translational Modifications, Proteolysis & Proteomics

Recent work reveals untimely activation of mitotic cyclin‐dependent kinase as a molecular basis for p53‐independent cell toxicity of USP7 deubiquitinase inhibitors.

The G2‐M transition in the eukaryotic cell cycle is a critical point to ensure that cells with damaged DNA are unable to enter the mitotic phase. This checkpoint is highly regulated by a number of kinases, including ATR, ATM and WEE1, and ends upon activation of the CDK1–cyclin B1 kinase complex (Visconti et al, 2016). Since premature activation of CDK1–cyclin B1 causes replication fork collapse, DNA damage, apoptosis, and mitotic catastrophe (Szmyd et al, 2019 and references therein), restricting CDK1–cyclin B1 activity prior to mitosis is key to maintaining genomic integrity.A body of recent work has suggested that the deubiquitinase USP7 is a master regulator of genomic integrity; it is required for DNA replication in numerous ways, including indirect regulation of cyclin A2 during the S‐phase, origin firing, and replication fork progression. USP7 also regulates mitotic entry by stabilizing PLK1, another kinase which is highly active in the M phase and ensures proper alignment of chromatids prior to segregation. Notably, USP7 inhibitors have become an attractive cancer therapeutic strategy based on their ability to trigger degradation of MDM2, and thereby stabilize p53 (Valles et al, 2020). However, there is growing evidence of USP7 inhibitor‐related toxicity that is not mediated through p53 (Lecona et al, 2016; Agathanggelou et al, 2017), indicating that USP7 inhibitors impact other cellular processes. Therefore, Galarreta et al (2021) investigated the potential functional relationship between USP7 and CDK1, given the role of both factors in regulating the cell cycle.Through a series of in vitro experiments, the authors confirmed that five USP7 inhibitors induce premature mitotic kinase activity, including increased MPM2 signal (indicative of mitosis‐specific phosphorylation events) and phosphorylation of histone H3 Ser10 (H3S10P) in all cells, regardless of where they are in the cell cycle. To determine whether USP7 affects CDK1 during the cell cycle, Galarreta et al (2021) demonstrate that cell lines treated with USP7 inhibitors exhibit reduced levels of inhibitory Tyr‐15 phosphorylation on CDK1 and increased cyclin B1 presence in the nucleus, suggesting activation of the CDK1–cyclin B1 complex. Furthermore, treatment with the CDK1 inhibitor RO3306 rescues the USP7 inhibitor‐dependent increase of mitotic activity.These observations suggest that CDK1 has the potential to catalyze mitosis‐specific phosphorylation irrespective of cell cycle phase and that cells rely on USP7‐specific deubiquitination to suppress or reverse premature CDK1 activity. Surprisingly, despite the nuclear localization of cyclin B and decrease in inhibitory CDK1 Tyr‐15 phosphorylation, USP7 inhibitors failed to drive cells into mitosis. How might this be? Nuclear localization of cyclin B normally occurs just minutes before the onset of mitosis and nuclear envelope breakdown (Santos et al, 2012), yet the nucleus remains intact following USP7 inhibition. Moreover, the decrease in Tyr‐15 phosphorylation suggests the ATR‐ and WEE1‐dependent G2/M checkpoint is inactivated by USP7 inhibition. Do these data hint at the presence of an additional, unknown regulatory mechanism controlling mitotic entry independent of the G2/M checkpoint and nuclear localization of the CDK1–cyclin B complex?To determine whether CDK1 is the driver of USP7 inhibitor toxicity, Galarreta et al exposed cells to CDK1 inhibitors and observed a reduction in apoptosis. Furthermore, CDK1 inhibitors promote cell survival in cells treated with three structurally unrelated USP7 inhibitors. Finally, CDC25A‐deficient mouse embryonic stem cells, which constitutively express low levels of CDK1, resist USP7 inhibition. Together, these data suggest that the USP7 inhibitor‐dependent toxicity is the result of CDK1‐mediated cell death. The authors note that the phosphatase PP2A is an antagonist for CDK1 in addition to being a candidate USP7 substrate (Lecona et al, 2016; Wlodarchak & Xing, 2016), and thus, they turned their attention to elucidating the connection between USP7 and PP2A. Combining biochemical and immunofluorescence studies, Galarreta et al (2021) demonstrate that USP7 interacts with two subunits of PP2A, and this interaction increases in response to USP7 inhibition. Inhibiting USP7 furthermore triggers PP2A re‐localization from the cytoplasm to the nucleus and increases the phosphorylation levels of PP2A substrates, such as AKT and PRC1. DT‐061, a chemical activator of PP2A, reduces CDK1 phosphorylation events, suggesting that PP2A deregulation is a key mediator of USP7 inhibitor‐related toxicity. Using phosphoproteomics to analyze cells treated with a USP7 inhibitor or PP2A‐inhibiting okadaic acid, the authors reveal that both treatments share a significant number of altered phosphorylated targets—especially those related to mitosis, the cell cycle, and epitopes with a CDK‐dependent motif. Thus, the effects of USP7 inhibitors on CDK1 appear to be mediated through PP2A localization to the nucleus.These unexpected findings raise several questions that potentially impact the current view of cell cycle regulation. For example, how does USP7 regulate PP2A localization and is this important for reversing CDK1‐dependent phosphorylation of mitotic substrates prior to mitosis? Does PP2A accumulation in the nucleus explain the failure of USP7‐inhibited cells to enter mitosis despite cyclin B1 nuclear localization? A role for ubiquitin signaling as a regulator of CDK1 in interphase cells has not been reported, and accordingly, new investigations will be needed to unravel the mechanisms by which USP7 controls PP2A localization.Another important question that arises is whether or not CDK1 has sufficient basal activity to phosphorylate numerous mitotic proteins independent of cell cycle phase. The observation that USP7 and PP2A act to prevent the improper accumulation of CDK1‐dependent phosphorylation even in G1 phase cells suggests this to be the case. Alternatively, USP7 activity may be required to prevent abnormal pairing of CDK1 with a cyclin that is ubiquitously expressed across the cell cycle. If so, more research will be needed to uncover how ubiquitin signaling ensures CDK1 only pairs with cyclin A and cyclin B once they accumulate later in the cell cycle.Interestingly, USP7 inhibition also causes a rapid loss in DNA synthesis of S‐phase cells, prompting the authors to perform a time course experiment to decipher the order of events following treatment (i.e., does CDK1 activation precede or follow termination of DNA replication?). High‐throughput microscopy and flow cytometry analysis reveal an immediate reduction of DNA replication, an increase of CDK1 activity, and elevated DNA damage before a detectable increase in H3S10P. Long‐term exposure of USP7 inhibitors leads to DNA damage restricted only to cells with corresponding high levels of H3S10P and MPM2. Overall, these results illustrate how inhibition of USP7 activates CDK1, disrupting DNA replication and inducing DNA damage (Fig 1).Open in a separate windowFigure 1USP7 regulates CDK1In untreated cells, CDK1 is suppressed by USP7 and PP2A, and CDK1‐cyclin B is only active during the G2/M transition. In response to treatment, USP7 facilitates PP2A localization to the nucleus. This allows CDK1 to initiate premature mitotic activity throughout the cell cycle, resulting in increased DNA damage and cellular toxicity.The finding that USP7 inhibitors caused a rapid shutdown of DNA replication brings to mind the recent findings by several groups, that CDK1 activation occurs concomitantly with the S/G2 transition and that premature CDK1 activation in S‐phase terminates replication (Akopyan et al, 2014; Lemmens et al, 2018; Saldivar et al, 2018; Deng et al, 2019; Branigan et al, 2021). According to these studies, coupling of CDK1 activation to the S/G2 transition is regulated by ATR‐CHK1 signaling, a pathway activated by DNA replication to restrain CDK1 through Tyr‐15 phosphorylation. Galarreta et al''s observation that USP7 inhibition overrides ATR‐CHK1 (i.e., Tyr‐15 phosphorylation) highlights the fundamental importance of ubiquitin signaling, and potentially PP2A localization, for ensuring proper S‐to‐M progression and genome maintenance. Ultimately, the mechanistic details of Galarreta et al''s observations remain to be elucidated, and undoubtedly, their findings will inspire future investigations. Moreover, their discovery may lead to a new strategy targeting CDK1 to mitigate unwanted toxicities in the clinic.     

Centrosome-associated Chk1 prevents premature activation of cyclin-B-Cdk1 kinase

Entry into mitosis occurs after activation of Cdk1, resulting in chromosome condensation in the nucleus and centrosome separation, as well as increased microtubule nucleation activity in the cytoplasm. The active cyclin-B1-Cdk1 complex first appears at the centrosome, suggesting that the centrosome may facilitate the activation of mitotic regulators required for the commitment of cells to mitosis. However, the signalling pathways involved in controlling the initial activation of Cdk1 at the centrosome remain largely unknown. Here, we show that human Chk1 kinase localizes to interphase, but not mitotic, centrosomes. Chemical inhibition of Chk1 resulted in premature centrosome separation and activation of centrosome-associated Cdk1. Forced immobilization of kinase-inactive Chk1 to centrosomes also resulted in premature Cdk1 activation. Conversely, under such conditions wild-type Chk1 impaired activation of centrosome-associated Cdk1, thereby resulting in DNA endoreplication and centrosome amplification. Activation of centrosomal Cdk1 in late prophase seemed to be mediated by cytoplasmic Cdc25B, whose activity is controlled by centrosome-associated Chk1. These results suggest that centrosome-associated Chk1 shields centrosomal Cdk1 from unscheduled activation by cytoplasmic Cdc25B, thereby contributing to proper timing of the initial steps of cell division, including mitotic spindle formation.     

Chk1 activation and the nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio

ATR and Chk1 are important components of a cell cycle checkpoint pathway. In this issue of Developmental Cell, Conn et al. shed a novel light on the molecular mechanism of Chk1 activation and raise the possibility of a developmental checkpoint that regulates Chk1 in response to the nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio.     

p21(Cip1) Promotes cyclin D1 nuclear accumulation via direct inhibition of nuclear export.

There is increasing evidence that p21(Cip1) and p27(Kip1) are requisite positive regulators of cyclin D1.CDK4 assembly and nuclear accumulation. Both Cip and Kip proteins can promote nuclear accumulation of cyclin D1, but the underlying mechanism has not been elucidated. We now provide evidence that p21(Cip1) promotes the nuclear accumulation of cyclin D1 complexes via inhibition of cyclin D1 nuclear export. In vivo, we demonstrate that p21(Cip1) can inhibit glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta-triggered cyclin D1 nuclear export and phosphorylation-dependent nucleocytoplasmic shuttling. Furthermore, we find that cyclin D1 nuclear accumulation in p21/p27 null cells can be restored through inhibition of CRM1-dependent nuclear export. The ability of p21(Cip1) to inhibit cyclin D1 nuclear export correlates with its ability to bind to Thr-286-phosphorylated cyclin D1 and thereby prevents cyclin D1.CRM1 association.     

Structural basis for CDK6 activation by a virus-encoded cyclin

Cyclin from herpesvirus saimiri (Vcyclin) preferentially forms complexes with cyclin-dependent kinase 6 (CDK6) from primate host cells. These complexes show higher kinase activity than host cell CDKs in complex with cellular cyclins and are resistant to cyclin-dependent inhibitory proteins (CDKIs). The crystal structure of human CDK6--Vcyclin in an active state was determined to 3.1 A resolution to better understand the structural basis of CDK6 activation by viral cyclins. The unphosphorylated CDK6 in complex with Vcyclin has many features characteristic of cyclinA-activated, phosphorylated CDK2. There are, however, differences in the conformation at the tip of the T-loop and its interactions with Vcyclin. Residues in the N-terminal extension of Vcyclin wrap around the tip of the CDK6 T-loop and form a short beta-sheet with the T-loop backbone. These interactions lead to a 20% larger buried surface in the CDK6--Vcyclin interface than in the CDK2--cyclinA complex and are probably largely responsible for the specificity of Vcyclin for CDK6 and resistance of the complex to inhibition by INK-type CDKIs.     

Homology model of the CDK1/cyclin B complex

We describe a refined homology model of a CDK1/cyclin B complex that was previously used for the structure-based optimization of the Paullone class of inhibitors. The preliminary model was formed from the homologous regions of the deposited CDK2/cyclin A crystal structure. Further refinement of the CDK1/cyclin B complex was accomplished using molecular mechanics and hydropathic analysis with a protocol of constraints and local geometry searches. For the most part, our CKD1/cyclin B homology model is very similar to the high resolution CDK2/cyclin A crystal structure regarding secondary and tertiary features. However, minor discrepancies between the two kinase structures suggest the possibility that ligand design may be specifically tuned for either CDK1 or CDK2. Our examination of the CDK1/cyclin B model includes a comparison with the CDK2/cyclin A crystal structure in the PSTAIRE interface region, connecting portions to the ATP binding domain, as well as the ATP binding site itself.     

Homology Model of the CDK1/cyclin B Complex

Abstract

We describe a refined homology model of a CDK1/cyclin B complex that was previously used for the structure-based optimization of the Paullone class of inhibitors. The preliminary model was formed from the homologous regions of the deposited CDK2/cyclin A crystal structure. Further refinement of the CDK1/cyclin B complex was accomplished using molecular mechanics and hydropathic analysis with a protocol of constraints and local geometry searches. For the most part, our CKD1/cyclin B homology model is very similar to the high resolution CDK2/cyclin A crystal structure regarding secondary and tertiary features. However, minor discrepancies between the two kinase structures suggest the possibility that ligand design may be specifically tuned for either CDK1 or CDK2. Our examination of the CDK1/cyclin B model includes a comparison with the CDK2/cyclin A crystal structure in the PSTAIRE interface region, connecting portions to the ATP binding domain, as well as the ATP binding site itself.     

Cyclin A2 regulates nuclear-envelope breakdown and the nuclear accumulation of cyclin B1

Mitosis is thought to be triggered by the activation of Cdk-cyclin complexes. Here we have used RNA interference (RNAi) to assess the roles of three mitotic cyclins, cyclins A2, B1, and B2, in the regulation of centrosome separation and nuclear-envelope breakdown (NEB) in HeLa cells. We found that the timing of NEB was affected very little by knocking down cyclins B1 and B2 alone or in combination. However, knocking down cyclin A2 markedly delayed NEB, and knocking down both cyclins A2 and B1 delayed NEB further. The timing of cyclin B1-Cdk1 activation was normal in cyclin A2 knockdown cells, and there was no delay in centrosome separation, an event apparently controlled by the activation of cytoplasmic cyclin B1-Cdk1. However, nuclear accumulation of cyclin B1-Cdk1 was markedly delayed in cyclin A2 knockdown cells. Finally, a constitutively nuclear cyclin B1, but not wild-type cyclin B1, restored normal NEB timing in cyclin A2 knockdown cells. These findings show that cyclin A2 is required for timely NEB, whereas cyclins B1 and B2 are not. Nevertheless cyclin B1 translocates to the nucleus just prior to NEB in a cyclin A2-dependent fashion and is capable of supporting NEB if rendered constitutively nuclear.     

Centrosomal and cytoplasmic Cdc2/cyclin B1 activation precedes nuclear mitotic events

The activation of cdc2/cyclin B is the trigger for entry into mitosis. The mechanism of cdc2/cyclin B activation is complex, but the final step is the dephosphorylation of the Thr14 and Tyr15 residues on the cdc2 subunit, catalyzed by a member of the Cdc25 family of phosphatases. Cdc2/cyclin B1 accumulates at the centrosome in late G2 phase and has been implicated in the conversion of the centrosome from an interphase to a mitotic microtubule organizing center. Here we demonstrate biochemically that cdc2/cyclin B1 accumulates at the centrosome in late G2 as the inactive, phosphotyrosine 15 form and that the centrosomal cdc2/cyclin B1 can be activated in vitro by recombinant cdc25B. We provide evidence that a portion of the cdc2/cyclin B1 translocated into the nucleus in prophase is the inactive tyrosine-15-phosphorylated form. At this time the centrosomal and cytoplasmic cdc2/cyclin B1 is already active. This provides evidence that the activation of cdc2/cyclin B1 is initiated in the cytoplasm and that full activation of the translocated pool occurs in the nucleus.     

Jasmonic acid prevents the accumulation of cyclin B1;1 and CDK-B in synchronized tobacco BY-2 cells

Jasmonic acid (JA) plays a crucial role in plant fertility and defense responses. It exerts an inhibitory effect on plant growth when applied exogenously. This effect seems to be somehow related to a negative regulation of cell cycle progression in the meristematic tissues. In this report, we focus on the molecular events that occur during JA-induced G2 arrest. We demonstrate that JA prevents the accumulation of B-type cyclin-dependent kinases and the expression of cyclin B1;1, which are both essential for the initiation of mitosis. This feature suggests the existence of an early G2 checkpoint that is affected by JA.     

The structure of cyclin E1/CDK2: implications for CDK2 activation and CDK2-independent roles

Cyclin E, an activator of phospho-CDK2 (pCDK2), is important for cell cycle progression in metazoans and is frequently overexpressed in cancer cells. It is essential for entry to the cell cycle from G0 quiescent phase, for the assembly of prereplication complexes and for endoreduplication in megakaryotes and giant trophoblast cells. We report the crystal structure of pCDK2 in complex with a truncated cyclin E1 (residues 81-363) at 2.25 A resolution. The N-terminal cyclin box fold of cyclin E1 is similar to that of cyclin A and promotes identical changes in pCDK2 that lead to kinase activation. The C-terminal cyclin box fold shows significant differences from cyclin A. It makes additional interactions with pCDK2, especially in the region of the activation segment, and contributes to CDK2-independent binding sites of cyclin E. Kinetic analysis with model peptide substrates show a 1.6-fold increase in kcat for pCDK2/cyclin E1 (81-363) over kcat of pCDK2/cyclin E (full length) and pCDK2/cyclin A. The structural and kinetic results indicate no inherent substrate discrimination between pCDK2/cyclin E and pCDK2/cyclin A with model substrates.     

Nuclear accumulation of cyclin B1 in mouse two-cell embryos is controlled by the activation of Cdc2

In the present study, the sequential expression and cellular localization of cyclin B1 was examined in two-cell mouse embryos to elucidate the mechanism of the two-cell block. One-cell embryos derived from in vitro fertilization were cultured with oviductal tissue (nonblocking condition) or without oviductal tissue (blocking condition) to establish the experimental conditions in which the embryos either overcome the two-cell block or do not. The amount of cyclin B1 gradually increased through the second cell cycle (through S to G2 phase). However, the difference was not observed between culture conditions. This showed that even embryos exhibiting the two-cell block normally synthesize cyclin B1 through the cell cycle. Cyclin B1 in embryos cultured under nonblocking condition accumulates in the nucleus during the transition from the G2 to the M phase, whereas that in embryos cultured in blocking condition localizes in the cytoplasm throughout the cell cycle. These data indicate that two-cell embryos cultured in blocking condition are able to normally synthesize cyclin B1 but have defects in nuclear accumulation of the protein. However, when two-cell blocked embryos were treated with okadaic acid, an activator of Cdc2 kinase, part of cyclin B1 in the embryos translocated into the nucleus. Moreover, treatment with butyrolactone I, a specific inhibitor of Cdc2 kinase, inhibits nuclear translocation of cyclin B1 in those embryos. These results suggest that Cdc2 kinase regulates the nuclear accumulation of cyclin B1 in mouse two-cell embryos.     

Phosphorylation of caspase-9 by CDK1/cyclin B1 protects mitotic cells against apoptosis

Proliferating metazoan cells respond to damage that has the potential to cause genomic instability by restricting the cell division cycle or by initiating apoptosis. The molecular mechanisms determining the balance between these responses are not well understood. Here, we show that the apoptotic initiator protease caspase-9 is regulated during the cell cycle through periodic phosphorylation at an inhibitory site, Thr125. This site is phosphorylated by CDK1/cyclin B1 during mitosis and in response to microtubule poisons that arrest cells at this stage of the cell cycle. Using an RNA interference strategy, we show that induction of apoptosis from mitosis in response to these drugs is caspase-9 dependent and is greatly increased when endogenous caspase-9 is replaced by a nonphosphorylatable mutant. Thus, phosphorylation of caspase-9 at Thr125 sets the threshold for activation of the intrinsic apoptotic pathway during the cell cycle, restrains apoptosis during mitosis, and determines sensitivity to antimitotic drugs.     

Kinetic basis for activation of CDK2/cyclin A by phosphorylation

The activation of most protein kinases requires phosphorylation at a conserved site within a structurally defined segment termed the activation loop. A classic example is the regulation of the cell cycle control enzyme, CDK2/cyclin A, in which catalytic activation depends on phosphorylation at Thr(160) in CDK2. The structural consequences of phosphorylation have been revealed by x-ray crystallographic studies on CDK2/cyclin A and include changes in conformation, mainly of the activation loop. Here, we describe the kinetic basis for activation by phosphorylation in CDK2/cyclin A. Phosphorylation results in a 100,000-fold increase in catalytic efficiency and an approximate 1,000-fold increase in the overall turnover rate. The effects of phosphorylation on the individual steps in the catalytic reaction pathway were determined using solvent viscosometric techniques. It was found that the increase in catalytic power arises mainly from a 3,000-fold increase in the rate of the phosphoryl group transfer step with a more moderate increase in substrate binding affinity. In contrast, the rate of phosphoryl group transfer in the ATPase pathway was unaffected by phosphorylation, demonstrating that phosphorylation at Thr(160) does not serve to stabilize ATP in the ATPase reaction. Thus, we hypothesize that the role of phosphorylation in the kinase reaction may be to specifically stabilize the peptide phosphoacceptor group.     

Cyclic AMP delays G2 progression and prevents efficient accumulation of cyclin B1 proteins in mouse macrophage cells

In mouse macrophage cells, the increase of the intracellular cAMP level activates protein kinase A (PKA) and results in inhibition of cell cycle progression in both G1 and G2/M phases. G1 arrest is mediated by a cdk inhibitor, p27Kip1, which prevents G1 cyclin/cdk complexes from being activated in response to colony stimulating factor-1, whereas inhibition of G2/M progression has not been fully elucidated. In this report we analyzed the effect of cAMP on G2/M progression in a mouse macrophage cell line, BAC1.2F5A. Flow cytometric analysis and mitotic index measurement using both synchronized and asynchronized cells revealed that addition of cAMP-elevating agents (8-bromoadenosine 3':5'-cyclic monophosphate and 3-isobutyl-methyl-xanthine), although they did not affect S phase progression or M/G1 transition, temporarily arrested cells in G2 but eventually the cells proceeded to M phase, resulting in about 4 hours delay of G2 progression. Timing of cyclin B1/Cdc2 kinase activation was also retarded by about 4 hours, which was accompanied by inhibition of efficient accumulation of cyclin B1 proteins. Initial induction and accumulation of cyclin B1 mRNA were not hampered, but the half life of cyclin B1 proteins was significantly shorter during G2 phase in the presence of cAMP-elevating agents compared with that of the cells blocked from progressing through M phase by nocodazole. These results imply that the cAMP/PKA pathway regulates G2 phase progression by altering the stability of a crucial cell cycle regulator.     

Different mechanisms of CDK5 and CDK2 activation as revealed by CDK5/p25 and CDK2/cyclin A dynamics

A detailed analysis is presented of the dynamics of human CDK5 in complexes with the protein activator p25 and the purine-like inhibitor roscovitine. These and other findings related to the activation of CDK5 are critically reviewed from a molecular perspective. In addition, the results obtained on the behavior of CDK5 are compared with data on CDK2 to assess the differences and similarities between the two kinases in terms of (i) roscovitine binding, (ii) regulatory subunit association, (iii) conformational changes in the T-loop following CDK/regulatory subunit complex formation, and (iv) specificity in CDK/regulatory subunit recognition. An energy decomposition analysis, used for these purposes, revealed why the binding of p25 alone is sufficient to stabilize the extended active T-loop conformation of CDK5, whereas the equivalent conformational change in CDK2 requires both the binding of cyclin A and phosphorylation of the Thr(160) residue. The interaction energy of the CDK5 T-loop with p25 is about 26 kcal.mol(-1) greater than that of the CDK2 T-loop with cyclin A. The binding pattern between CDK5 and p25 was compared with that of CDK2/cyclin A to find specific regions involved in CDK/regulatory subunit recognition. The analyses performed revealed that the alphaNT-helix of cyclin A interacts with the alpha6-alpha7 loop and the alpha7 helix of CDK2, but these regions do not interact in the CDK5/p25 complex. Further differences between the CDK5/p25 and CDK2/cyclin A systems studied are discussed with respect to their specific functionality.     

Phenanthrene derivatives from Appendicula reflexa as new CDK1/cyclin B inhibitors

The chemical investigation of the epiphytic orchid Appendicula reflexa led to the isolation of one new phenanthrene, 3,4,6,7-tetramethoxyphenanthrene-2,8-diol (1) and one new bisphenanthrene ether, named blestrin E (6), together with the known monomeric phenanthrenes, nudol (2), 3,4,6-trimethoxyphenanthrene-2,7-diol (3), coelonin (4) and 6-methoxycoelonin (5). Their structural elucidation was established on the basis of spectroscopic data analysis. The monomeric phenanthrenes 1 and 3 showed moderate cytotoxic activities against KB, MCF7 and K562 cells, and potent inhibiting activity on CDK1/cyclin B (IC₅₀s = 0.07 and 0.2 μM, respectively).