CA 72-4 compared with CEA and CA 19-9 as a marker of some gastrointestinal malignancies

The objective of this study was to compare CA 72-4 with CEA and CA 19-9 in gastrointestinal malignancies. CA 72-4 was assayed by radioimmunoassay and CEA and CA 19-9 with the Abbott IMx analyser. The study included 52 patients with gastrointestinal cancer and 20 controls with benign gastrointestinal diseases. The 52 cases showed marker sensitivities of 39%, 49% and 35% for CA 72-4, CEA and CA 19-9, respectively, and 64% when the markers were combined. Marker expression in serum was highest in colorectal carcinoma followed by gastric and esophageal carcinoma. The sensitivities of the individual markers in colorectal, gastric and esophageal carcinomas, respectively, were: CA 72-4, 56%, 32% and 18%; CEA, 83%, 33% and 18%; CA 19-9, 53%, 25% and 18%. The sensitivity of the three markers in combination was 89%, 50% and 46% in colorectal, gastric and esophageal cancer, respectively. The specificity of CA 72-4, CEA and CA 19-9 was 100%, 72% and 86%, respectively. However, CA 72-4 is not a useful a marker for gastrointestinal cancers because of its poor sensitivity. CEA, which had the best overall sensitivity and a reasonable specificity, was the most useful single marker, especially for colorectal cancer. Whereas the single markers were not useful in gastric and esophageal cancer, the combination of the three may be.     

磁共振胰胆管成像联合血清CA125、CA19-9、CEA对良恶性梗阻性黄疸的诊断价值

摘要 目的：研究磁共振胰胆管成像（MRCP）联合血清糖类抗原125（CA125）、糖类抗原19-9（CA19-9）、癌胚抗原（CEA）对良恶性梗阻性黄疸的诊断价值。方法：将医院从2018年1月～2020年2月期间收治的90例良恶性梗阻性黄疸患者纳入研究。将其按照良恶性的差异分为良性梗阻性黄疸51例以及恶性梗阻性黄疸39例。分别对所有患者进行MRCP检测,并分析良恶性梗阻性黄疸MRCP影像学表现特征的差异。此外,采集所有患者清晨空腹静脉血,检测血清CA125、CA19-9、CEA水平并进行对比。通过受试者工作特征（ROC）曲线分析明确MRCP联合血清CA125、CA19-9、CEA对良恶性梗阻性黄疸的诊断价值。结果：恶性梗阻性黄疸部位为十二指肠乳头区人数占比明显高于良性梗阻性黄疸,而胰头上区、胰头区人数占比均明显低于良性梗阻性黄疸;且恶性梗阻性黄疸梗阻重度扩张人数占比明显高于良性梗阻性黄疸,而梗阻轻度扩张人数占比明显低于良性梗阻性黄疸,差异均有统计学意义（均P＜0.05）。恶性梗阻性黄疸患者血清CA125、CEA水平均明显高于良性梗阻性黄疸患者（均P＜0.05）;而两组血清CA19-9水平对比不明显（P＞0.05）。MRCP联合血清CA125、CA19-9、CEA诊断良恶性梗阻性黄疸的曲线下面积、灵敏度、特异度、约登指数均明显高于MRCP和血清CA125、CA19-9、CEA单独诊断。结论：MRCP联合血清CA125、CA19-9、CEA对良恶性梗阻性黄疸的诊断价值较高,值得临床推广应用。     

Elevated CEA and CA19-9 serum levels independently predict advanced pancreatic cancer at diagnosis

Abstract

Purpose: It is suggested that tumour markers carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) could be used to predict the stage of pancreatic cancer. However, optimal cut-off values for CEA and CA19-9 are disputable. This study aimed to assess the value of CEA and CA19-9 serum levels at diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) as predictors for the advanced stage of PDAC in patients discussed at pancreatic multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings.

Methods: Patients with suspected PDAC discussed at MDT meetings from 2013 to 2017 were reviewed, in order to determine optimal cut-off values of both CEA and CA19-9.

Results: In total, 375 patients were included. Optimal cut-off values for predicting advanced PDAC were 7.0?ng/ml for CEA and 305.0?U/ml for CA19-9, resulting in positive predictive values of 83.3%, 73.6%, and 91.4% for CEA, CA19-9 and combined, respectively. Both tumour markers were independent predictors of advanced PDAC, demonstrated by an odds ratio of 4.21 (95% CI:1.85–9.56; p?=?0.001) for CEA and 2.58 for CA19-9 (95% CI:1.30–5.14; p?=?0.007).

Conclusions: CEA appears to be a more robust predictor of advanced PDAC than CA19-9. Implementing CEA and CA19-9 serum levels during MDT meetings as an additional tool for establishing tumour resectability is worthwhile for tailored diagnostics.     

血清CEA、CA19-9、CYFRA21-1与结直肠腺癌的相关性分析

目的:探究血清癌胚抗原(carcinoembryonic antigen,CEA)、糖类抗原19-9、细胞角蛋白19片段(cytokeratin19 fragements,CYFRA21-1)与结直肠腺癌的病理相关性。方法:选择于我院接受治疗的80例结直肠腺癌患者为病例组,选择同期于我院接受治疗的50例良性结直肠病变患者为良性对照组,选择我院体格检查的50例健康个体为对照组,分别采集三组个体的血样并进行CEA、CA19-9以及CYFRA21-1水平的检测,并比对三组个体上述因子阳性表达率、因子水平,同时分析三种因子同结直肠腺癌患者TNM分期相关性,最后探究三种因子对结直肠腺癌的诊断价值。结果:(1)以CEA≥2.805μg/L、CA19-9≥39 U/m L、CYFR21-1≥3.3 ng/mL为临界值,结果显示病例组CEA阳性率51.25%,CA19-9阳性率31.25%,CYFR21-1阳性率40.00%,明显高于良性组的10.00%、20.00%和10.00%,高于对照组的8.00%、12.00%和2.00%(P<0.05);(2)比较显示病例组患者的CEA、CA19-9以及CYFR21-1水平明显高于良性对照组以及对照组(P<0.05),良性对照组CEA、CA19-9以及CYFR21-1水平明显高于对照组(P<0.05);(3)比较显示IV期结直肠腺癌患者CEA、CA19-9以及CYFRA21-1水平明显高于III期以及I+II期(P<0.05),III期三种因子水平明显高于I+II期(P<0.05);(4)CEA对结直肠腺癌诊断一致性71.25%,灵敏度65.00%,特异度90.00%;CA19-9诊断一致性46.25%,灵敏度35.00%,特异度80.00%;CYFRA21-1诊断一致性55.00%,灵敏度46.67%,特异度80.00%;联合诊断一致性95.00%,灵敏度95.00%,特异度95.00%。结论:血清CEA、CA19-9以及CYFRA21-1对结直肠腺癌具有较明确的诊断价值,不同病理分期患者中表达差异明显,可以考虑将联合诊断作为结直肠腺癌鉴别方式之一,推广于临床中。     

CEA、CA19-9与CA72-4用于诊断老年胃癌的临床价值研究

目的:探讨CEA、CA19-9以及CA72-4诊断老年胃癌的临床价值。方法:对192例经活检确诊为老年胃癌患者的血清CEA、CA19-9以及CA72-4水平进行分析,比较不同TNM分期老年胃癌患者的血清CEA、CA19-9以及CA72-4阳性率,并评价血清CEA、CA19-9以及CA72-4水平诊断老年胃癌的敏感性和特异性。结果:TNM 3期及4期的胃癌患者CEA以及CA19-9阳性率明显高于1期及2期胃癌患者,而TNM1-4期的胃癌患者CA72-4的阳性率都明显高于CEA以及CA19-9。以6.5 ng/m L、30U/m L以及4 ng/m L分别作为CEA、CA19-9以及CA72-4的上限临界值,其诊断老年患者的胃癌的敏感性分别为15.6%、19.3%以及29.2%,特异性分别为98.9%、97.2%以及98.0%,曲线下面积分别为0.59、0.62以及0.66。结论:CEA、CA19-9以及CA72-4对于诊断老年胃癌都有较好的特异性,但敏感性一般,尤其对于早期胃癌,CEA及CA19-9敏感性较差,CA72-4敏感性要优于二者。     

胰腺癌患者血清CEA、CA242、CA199水平变化及联合诊断的ROC曲线分析

目的:探讨胰腺癌患者血清癌胚抗原(CEA)、糖类抗原242(CA242)、糖类抗原199(CA199)水平变化,并分析上述指标对胰腺癌的联合诊断价值,为胰腺癌的临床诊断提供参考。方法:选择2014年2月至2018年2月我院收治的186例胰腺癌患者(胰腺癌组)、89例胰腺炎患者(胰腺炎组)作为研究对象,并取同期来我院检查的268例健康人作为对照组。比较三组受试者的血清CEA、CA242、CA199水平变化,对比分析血清CEA、CA242、CA199的单一以及联合诊断的准确度、特异度以及灵敏度,并绘制ROC曲线以分析上述指标的诊断价值。结果:三组受试者血清CEA、CA242、CA199水平差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。且胰腺炎组和胰腺癌组的血清CEA、CA242、CA199水平明显高于对照组,胰腺癌组患者的血清CEA、CA242、CA199水平明显高于胰腺炎组,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。ROC曲线结果显示,CEA诊断价值最大,CA199诊断价值最小。CEA是胰腺癌单项肿瘤标志物中敏感度最高的,为85.48%;特异度最高的为CA242(96.72%);三项肿瘤标志物联合诊断的准确度增加至92.27%,敏感度增加至95.16%,特异度相比略有下降。结论:与单一肿瘤标记物诊断胰腺癌相比,CEA、CA242、CA199联合诊断的敏感度和准确度均明显升高,可以明显改善胰腺癌的漏诊率,提高患者的生存率,具有较好的临床应用价值。     

Tumor markers, liver function tests and symptoms in 115 patients with isolated colorectal liver metastases

Development of the hybridoma technique has made the identification of several new tumor antigens possible. Although it was hoped that they would be more tumor-specific, none of these markers are found exclusively in tumor or in serum of tumor patients. Compared with carcinoembryionic antigen (CEA) and liver function tests, the roles of these markers (CA 19-9, CA 125, CA 15-3) were prospectively evaluated in 115 patients with colorectal liver metastases. Patients were classified according to tumor volume (T1 less than 25%, T2 25-75%, T3 greater than 75%), and the extension of infiltration (solitary/multiple/diffuse; unilateral, bilateral). Patients with benign liver or biliary disease served as a control group (n = 63). Overall sensitivity was 87% for *1, 50% for *2 and 38% for *3, with a significant correlation with tumor size. CEA serum levels were elevated in 88% of all patients. CA 19-9 was less sensitive: positive in 59%. Because of some complementary elevations, the combined use of CEA, CA 19-9 and CA 125 raised sensitivity to 94%. CA 19-9 and LDH could be useful for confirmation because of their higher specificity; however, the specificity of CEA rose to 93% on using a cut-off of 10 ng/ml instead of 3 ng/ml. The results indicate that CEA and CA 19-9 as well as liver function tests are helpful for preoperative staging in conjunction with imaging procedures before liver resection or regional chemotherapy.     

The significance of CA19-9 tumor antigen in the serum of patients with carcinomas

The concentration of serum CA19-9TM in 101 patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma (CRC), and 109 patients with carcinomas of lung, breast, stomach and pancreas and hepatoma, and 40 normal healthy controls including an equal number of smokers and nonsmokers were determined by solid phase radioimmunoassay of CA19-9 assay kits (Centocor). Of the normal sera, only 1 out of 40 (2.5%) was over 37.6 U/ml. No significant difference of CA19-9 levels was found between smokers (14.4 +/- 9.0 U/ml) and non-smokers (16.0 +/- 10.2 U/ml) of normal control. In patients sera, the mean value of CA19-9 levels was significantly higher in patients with Dukes B (P less than 0.05) and in patients with Dukes C and D (P less than 0.001) than the normal healthy control (15.2 +/- 10.2 U/ml). Analysis of serum CEA concentrations has shown a similar result in patients with all Dukes staged CRC. The CA19-9 levels was also significantly elevated in patients with gastric carcinoma, lung carcinoma, hepatoma, and especially in patients with pancreatic carcinoma (P less than 0.0001). The levels of CA19-9 elevated in 50% (22/44) of patients with advanced CRC while the elevation was 8 of 43 (18.6%) patients with localized CRC. A comparison of CA19-9 and CEA assays showed no correlation (r = 0.125) between the two assays. Although the CA19-9 assay (26.4%) was less sensitive than the CEA assay (51.7%), the specificity of CA19-9 assay (97.5%) was better than that of CEA assay (87.5%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor in patients with colorectal cancer

Granulocyte-macrophage-colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) belongs to the group of glycoproteins called colony-stimulating factors (CSFs). It has been shown that the activity of CSFs is not limited to the hematopoietic cells but can also affect the proliferation of colon carcinoma cell lines. The purpose of this investigation was to compare the serum level of GM-CSF in colorectal cancer patients to a control group, to assess the level of GM-CSF in relation to the level of carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9), and to define the sensitivity, the specificity and the predictive values of GM-CSF in colorectal cancer. In this study, the serum level of tumour markers was measured in 30 patients with colorectal cancer and in 20 healthy subjects. GM-CSF was assayed using ELISA system, CEA and CA 19-9 were measured by MEIA. The serum levels of CEA, CA 19-9 and GM-CSF were higher in the patients with colorectal cancer than in the control group. The sensitivities of CEA (63%) and CA 19-9 (56%) were lower than the GM-CSF sensitivity (80%). The specificities of tumour markers were 70% (CEA, GM-CSF) and 75% for CA 19-9. The GM-CSF predictive v values were higher than the CEA and CA 19-9 values. These results suggest that GM-CSF may be useful as tumour marker in colorectal cancer, but further studies are needed.     

CA19-9、CA125、CEA及Ferritin联合检测诊断非小细胞肺癌脑、骨转移的临床价值研究

目的:研究CA19-9、CA125、癌胚抗原(CEA)以及铁蛋白(Ferritin)四种肿瘤标志物联合检测用于诊断非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)脑或(和)骨转移的临床价值。方法:选取2011年5月至2012年5月于我院就诊的NSCLC患者184例。将发现脑或(和)骨转移者归为转移组,共96例;将未发现脑、骨转移者归为无转移组,共88例,采用电化学发光免疫分析法测定各组患者血清中CA19-9、CA125、CEA以及Ferritin的水平,探讨其在NSCLC患者脑或(和)骨转移中的诊断效能。结果:在发生脑或(和)骨转移的NSCLC患者中,CA19-9、CA125、CEA及Ferritin四种肿瘤标志物的水平和阳性率均显著高于未发生骨、脑转移的患者。ROC曲线分析显示,以上四种肿瘤标志物对诊断NSCLC骨或(和)脑转移的敏感度分别为73.48%、69.13%、66.35%和61.34%;特异度分别为80.02%、32.51%、65.11%和62.58%;将四种肿瘤标志物联合进行诊断的敏感度和特异度分别为91.21%和88.64%,显著高于单一标志物诊断。结论:发生脑或(和)骨转移的NSCLC患者血清中CA19-9、CA125、CEA以及Ferritin四种肿瘤标志物水平均显著升高,以上标志物联合检测可提高NSCLC患者脑或(和)骨转移的诊断效能,可作为早期诊断NSCLC患者脑或(和)骨转移的辅助检测指标。     

CA 19-9 assay in patients with extrahepatic cholestatic jaundice

Serum concentrations of the CA 19-9 tumour marker were determined in 35 patients with histologically proven bilio-pancreatic malignancies associated with obstructive jaundice and in 35 patients with benign extrahepatic jaundice due to choledocholithiasis. At a cut-off level of 37 U/ml the sensitivity of this assay was 82.8%, but the specificity was very low (45.7%). Thus CA 19-9 can not be employed to differentiate between malignant and benign extrahepatic jaundice. Serial samples of CA 19-9 were achieved in 7 patients with benign and in 6 patients with malignant biliary obstruction, before and after the disappearance of jaundice. Serum concentrations of this tumour-antigen returned to normal concurrently with the bilirubin values only in patients with benign obstruction, remaining unchanged in all cases of malignancies. The data suggest that patients with extrahepatic jaundice should be evaluated by other examinations or by collecting serial samples for this assay.     

Enhanced discrimination of malignant from benign pancreatic disease by measuring the CA 19-9 antigen on specific protein carriers

The CA 19-9 assay detects a carbohydrate antigen on multiple protein carriers, some of which may be preferential carriers of the antigen in cancer. We tested the hypothesis that the measurement of the CA 19-9 antigen on individual proteins could improve performance over the standard CA 19-9 assay. We used antibody arrays to measure the levels of the CA 19-9 antigen on multiple proteins in serum or plasma samples from patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma or pancreatitis. Sample sets from three different institutions were examined, comprising 531 individual samples. The measurement of the CA 19-9 antigen on any individual protein did not improve upon the performance of the standard CA 19-9 assay (82% sensitivity at 75% specificity for early-stage cancer), owing to diversity among patients in their CA 19-9 protein carriers. However, a subset of cancer patients with no elevation in the standard CA 19-9 assay showed elevations of the CA 19-9 antigen specifically on the proteins MUC5AC or MUC16 in all sample sets. By combining measurements of the standard CA 19-9 assay with detection of CA 19-9 on MUC5AC and MUC16, the sensitivity of cancer detection was improved relative to CA 19-9 alone in each sample set, achieving 67-80% sensitivity at 98% specificity. This finding demonstrates the value of measuring glycans on specific proteins for improving biomarker performance. Diagnostic tests with improved sensitivity for detecting pancreatic cancer could have important applications for improving the treatment and management of patients suffering from this disease.     

The tumour marker CA 195 in colorectal and pancreatic cancer.

The aim of this study was to measure the serum level of the tumour markers CA 195 and CEA in patients with either colorectal or pancreatic cancer both before and at serial intervals after operation. CA 195 and CEA were measured in 199 patients with colorectal cancer and 52 patients with pancreatic cancer. The median concentrations of CA 195 were 3.0 u/ml (interquartile range 3.0-4.5 u/ml) in patients with a Dukes' stage A lesion, 5.8 u/ml (3.0-18.2 u/ml) in patients with a Dukes' stage B lesion, 6.1 u/ml (3.0-24.7 u/ml) in patients with a Dukes' stage C and 23.8 u/ml (11.1-409.0 u/ml) in patients with metastatic disease (normal range 0-7 u/ml). The median levels of CEA were 2.6 ng/ml (1.7-3.3 ng/ml) for Dukes' stage A, 3.3 ng/ml (1.7-7.2 ng/ml) for Dukes' stage B, 3.7 ng/ml (2.2-7.9 ng/ml) for Dukes' stage C and 34.5 ng/ml (13.3-289.4 ng/ml) for metastatic disease. A rising level of CA 195 or CEA after operation suggested recurrence of the tumour. In none of these patients was the recurrence operable. In patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma, the level of CA 195 was significantly higher in patients with metastatic disease but it did not discriminate between resectable and unresectable disease. The duration of survival correlated with the initial level of CA 195 (Rs = -0.66, p less than 0.001).     

Comparison of CA 15-3 and CEA in diagnosis and monitoring of breast cancer

In order to assess the utility of the tumor-associated antigen CA15-3 in the diagnosis of breast cancer, this new tumor marker was measured pre-operatively in 1342 patients. This group comprised 509 patients with malignant disease (134 with breast cancer and 375 with other malignancies not involving the breast) and 833 patients with benign surgical diseases (95 patients with fibroadenoma of the breast, 738 with other benign diseases). The results were compared with those for carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) in the diagnosis of breast cancer. CA15-3 was above the normal limits of 25 U/ml in 31% of the patients with breast cancer, in 22% of patients with other malignancies, and in 9% of patients with benign diseases. CEA was elevated in 26% of patients with breast cancer (greater than 3 ng/ml). CA15-3 levels were above 50 U/ml in 13% of the breast cancer patients, in 6% of patients with other malignancies, and in 0.2% of the patients with benign diseases. There was a good correlation between CA15-3 level and tumor stage in breast cancer. CA15-3 serum levels were over 50 U/ml in respectively 0%, 2%, 13%, and 73% of the patients with stages I, II, III, and IV. CA15-3 and CEA were also determined in 671 patients who had received initial curative surgery of breast cancer, and who regularly attended our follow-up clinic. CA15-3 was found to be more sensitive than CEA in detecting recurrences of breast cancer.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

CA19-9及CA72-4联合检测在胰腺癌诊断中的应用价值

目的:探究联合检测血清糖类抗原(CA)19-9和CA72-4水平在胰腺癌诊断中的应用价值。方法:回顾性选取我院2016年1月～2017年12月收治的72例胰腺癌患者作为胰腺癌组,以同期住院的68例良性胰腺病患者作为良性胰腺疾病组,同时纳入67例健康体检者作为对照组。检测三组人群血清CA19-9和CA72-4水平,采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC曲线)及曲线下面积(AUC)分析评估各单项检测指标及联合检测指标对胰腺癌特异性诊断的价值。结果:胰腺癌组患者血清CA19-9和CA72-4水平分别为(137.69±25.32)U/mL和(6.96±1.25)U/mL,显著高于良性胰腺疾病组和对照组(P0.05)。血清CA19-9和CA72-4联合检测诊断胰腺癌的ROC曲线AUC高于其单独检测(P0.05),CA19-9和CA72-4的最佳临界值分别为86.94 U/m L和4.23 U/m L,此时联合检测诊断胰腺癌的敏感性为94.7%,特异性为95.2%。结论:联合检测血清CA19-9和CA72-4诊断胰腺癌的临床价值明显优于其单独检测。     

Early diagnosis of lung cancer by detection of tumor liberated protein

Tumor liberated protein (TLP) is a protein that can be used to reveal the early development of a tumor. Besides being formed in the tumor, TLP is released in the blood when a patient starts producing cancer cells, which in turn enables the physician to intervene at a stage when the cancer is operable. To date, the available studies of tumor markers in lung cancer patients are CEA, NSE, TPA, Chromogranine, CA125, CA19-9, and Cyfra 21-1. The sensitivity and specificity for serum markers ranges between 50 and 90%, depending on the study and the clinical samples analyzed. Most of these markers show an increased rate of positivity as the stage advances. There are very limited data on TLP to draw any firm conclusion regarding the diagnostic value of this marker. TLP has been detected in 53.1% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients (N = 534) with 75% being positive in the early stage (stage I) and dropping to 45% in the late stage (stage IV). However, 7.6% blood donor sera and 17.4% chronic lung disease sera have also tested positive. In a confirmation study, the specificity was 89.94% and the sensibility was 63.63% from stage III to IV NSCLC patients. In an initial study of TLP as a marker for early detection in stage I, NSCLC patients showed a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 80% for TLP compared to a sensitivity of 33.3% for CA19-9, 11.1% for Cyfra 21-1 and CA125, and 0% for CEA; the specificity for all four of the latter markers was 100%. Using immunohistochemical analysis with peroxidase anti-peroxidase (PAP), we observed that NSCLC cells were positive; we used the specific rabbit antiserum to TLP, which turned out negative in the presence of 1 mg/ml of the synthetized peptide. The pre-serum was also negative. The same reactivity was found early in the modified epithelial cells of interstitial lung fibrosis and might be a predictive marker of cell transformation. The site of the peroxidase positivity was cytoplasmic, of diffuse and/or granular type.     

血清CEA、CA19-9联合CRP在消化道恶性肿瘤的诊断价值分析

摘要 目的：探讨与分析血清CEA、CA19-9联合CRP在消化道恶性肿瘤的诊断价值。方法：2019年8月到2022年5月选择在本院诊治的消化道恶性肿瘤患者150例作为消化道恶性肿瘤组,同期选择在本院体检的健康人群150例作为健康组。采集两组人群的血清癌胚抗原（CEA）、糖类抗原19-9（CA19-9）、C-反应蛋白（CRP）含量,调查患者的病理特征并判断诊断价值。结果：消化道恶性肿瘤组的血清CEA、CA19-9、CRP含量都高于健康组（P<0.05）。消化道恶性肿瘤组的CEA、CA19-9、CRP阳性率为54.7 %、58.7 %、60.7 %,高于健康组的3.3 %、4.0 %、4.7 %（P<0.05）。在消化道恶性肿瘤组中,不同组织学分化、临床分期、淋巴结转移患者的血清CEA、CA19-9、CRP含量对比有差异（P<0.05）。血清CEA、CA19-9联合CRP诊断为阳性113例,在健康组中诊断为阳性3例,血清CEA、CA19-9联合CRP在消化道恶性肿瘤的诊断敏感性与特异性分别为75.3 %（113/150）和98.0 %（147/150）。结论：消化道恶性肿瘤患者多伴随有血清CEA、CA19-9、CRP的高表达,病理特征与血清CEA、CA19-9、CRP含量存在相关性,血清CEA、CA19-9联合CRP在消化道恶性肿瘤的诊断敏感性与特异性都比较好。     

MCA in patients with breast cancer: correlation with CEA and CA15-3

MCA serum levels were determined in 27 healthy subjects, 136 with benign pathology (42 breast) and in 289 patients with cancer (247 active). The last group includes 223 patients with breast cancer (96 without metastases, 89 with metastases and 38 no-evidence of disease). CEA and CA15-3 serum levels were determined in all the patients with breast diseases. The mean levels of MCA were 4.7 + 2.4 U/ml in the control group, considering less than 11 U/ml as normal. MCA values were abnormal in 15.4% of patients with benign pathology, mainly in those with liver cirrhosis (8/20) and lung diseases (4/20). In the majority of these cases, the rise was only moderate, lower than 15 U/ml in 97.5% of patients. In malignant diseases, important increments were found in breast cancer (19.8% Mo, 77.5% M1) and ovarian cancer stages III-IV (44.4%). When we compared MCA serum levels with CA15-3 and CEA in breast pathology, a similar specificity was observed: 92.3%, 92.3% and 100% in cases with benign pathology and 92.1%, 94.7%, and 97.4% in NED patients, respectively. MCA and CA15-3 sensitivity was similar in breast cancer without metastases (19.8%) and lower for CEA (16.7%). In patients with breast cancer without metastases, we found a relation between positivity of these tumor markers and prognostic factors (tumor size, nodal involvement). The disease free interval in patients with locoregional breast cancer was shorter in cases with abnormal presurgical levels of some of the tumor markers, but only the difference from MCA was significant (p less than 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Improved Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Diagnosis in Jaundiced and Non-Jaundiced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Patients through the Combination of Routine Clinical Markers Associated to Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Pathophysiology

Background

There is still no reliable biomarker for the diagnosis of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Carbohydrate antigen 19–9 (CA 19–9) is a tumor marker only recommended for pancreatic adenocarcinoma follow-up. One of the clinical problems lies in distinguishing between this cancer and other benign pancreatic diseases such as chronic pancreatitis. In this study we will assess the value of panels of serum molecules related to pancreatic cancer physiopathology to determine whether alone or in combination could help to discriminate between these two pathologies.

Methods

CA 19–9, carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), C-reactive protein, albumin, insulin growth factor-1 (IGF-1) and IGF binding protein-3 were measured using routine clinical analyzers in a cohort of 47 pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 20 chronic pancreatitis and 15 healthy controls.

Results

The combination of CA 19–9, IGF-1 and albumin resulted in a combined area under the curve (AUC) of 0.959 with 93.6% sensitivity and 95% specificity, much higher than CA 19–9 alone. An algorithm was defined to classify the patients as chronic pancreatitis or pancreatic cancer with the above specificity and sensitivity. In an independent validation group of 20 pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 13 chronic pancreatitis patients, the combination of the four molecules classified correctly all pancreatic adenocarcinoma and 12 out of 13 chronic pancreatitis patients.

Conclusions

Although this panel of markers should be validated in larger cohorts, the high sensitivity and specificity values and the convenience to measure these parameters in clinical laboratories shows great promise for improving pancreatic adenocarcinoma diagnosis.     

Significance of CA 72.4 serum levels in gastrointestinal diseases

In order to evaluate the usefulness of Ca 72.4 tumor associated antigen assay in gastrointestinal diseases, we have studied 751 patients suffering from benign (376) and neoplastic (375) digestive diseases and 305 normal controls. The cut-off point was fixed at 6 U/ml. The Ca 72.4 assay, with the proposed method, provides additional information only in gastric cancers; the positivity of the marker in gastric neoplasms is 38.4% and the specificity vs gastric ulcers and atrophic gastritis is 99%. In six patients with gastric cancer, the Ca 72.4 is the only positive test. The most striking observation to be made from the current study is a no good sensitivity of the marker for gastrointestinal cancers (29.6% vs 35.7 and 37.6% for CEA and Ca 19-9 respectively), but rather the excellent specificity of the Ca 72.4 immunoassay with respect to being gastrointestinal diseases (98.7%), vs values of specificity for CEA and Ca 19-9 of 94 and 92%. In conclusion, the high specificity of this marker for gastrointestinal neoplasms may be very interesting in follow-up studies. In fact, an elevation of serum levels of Ca 72.4 should always be taken seriously.