Kappa immunoglobulin promoters and enhancers display developmentally controlled interactions.

We have investigated the interaction of the kappa immunoglobulin light chain intron and 3' enhancers with two different kappa promoters at distinct stages of B-cell development. We find that transiently transfected reporter gene constructs driven by either the kappa V-region promoter, or the kappa germline promoter, are controlled by the known enhancers of the locus in a developmentally regulated fashion. We have, however, observed differences in promoter activation by each enhancer. Moreover, constructs controlled by a combination of both enhancers are synergistically activated at the B-cell and plasma cell stages as compared with constructs containing either enhancer alone. This synergy is not observed early in development, at the pre-B cell stage. The pattern of enhancer and promoter interactions is discussed in the context of the known developmental regulation of the locus.     

Homologous and heterologous enhancers modulate spatial expression but not cell-type specificity of the murine gamma F-crystallin promoter

Previous studies have shown that mouse gamma F-crystallin sequences -759 to +45, which include the core promoter and two upstream enhancer elements, contain sufficient information for directing gene expression to terminally differentiated fiber cells of the ocular lens. To investigate the role that proximal sequences of the mouse gamma F-crystallin promoter play in the developmental regulation of gene expression, we generated transgenic mice containing the lacZ gene driven by either mouse gamma F-crystallin sequences -171 to +45, which lack functional enhancers, or a hybrid hamster alpha A-/mouse gamma F-crystallin promoter, which contains the hamster alpha A-crystallin enhancer instead of operational gamma F-crystallin enhancers. In situ analysis of lacZ expression in these mice revealed that the mouse gamma F-crystallin promoter segment -171 to +45, which shows low activity in vitro, is able to direct gene expression to the fiber cells in the nucleus of the lens. However, animals expressing gamma 171-lacZ show both a lower level of expression of the lacZ gene and a narrower pattern of staining in the lens nucleus than mice expressing gamma 759-lacZ, which contains the two enhancer elements located between -392 and -278 and -226 to -123.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Developmental Expression of the Glucose Dehydrogenase Gene in Drosophila Melanogaster

The Gld gene of Drosophila melanogaster is transiently expressed during every stage of development. The temporal pattern of Gld expression is highly correlated with that of ecdysteroids. Exogeneous treatment of third instar larvae with 20-hydroxyecdysone induces the accumulation of Gld mRNA in the hypoderm and anterior spiracular gland cells. During metamorphosis Gld is expressed in a variety of tissues derived from the ectoderm. In the developing reproductive tract, Gld mRNA accumulates in the female spermathecae and oviduct and in the male ejaculatory duct and ejaculatory bulb. These four organs are derived from closely related cell lineages in the genital imaginal disc. Since the expression of Gld is not required for the development of these reproductive structures, this spatial pattern of expression is most likely a fortuitous consequence of a shared regulatory factor in this cell lineage. At the adult stage a high level of the Gld mRNA is only observed in the male ejaculatory duct.     

Evolution of the glucose dehydrogenase gene in Drosophila

The glucose dehydrogenase genes (Gld) of Drosophila melanogaster, of D. pseudoobscura, and of D. virilis have been isolated and compared with each other in order to identify conserved and divergent aspects of their structure and expression. The exon/intron structure of Gld is conserved. The Gld mRNAs are similar, with a range of 2.6-2.8 kb among the three species. All three species exhibit peaks of Gld expression during every major developmental stage, although considerable variation in the precise timing of these peaks exists between species. Interspecific gene transfer experiments demonstrate that the regulation and function of the D. pseudoobscura Gld is similar enough to the homologous gene in D. melanogaster to substitute for its essential role in the eclosion process. Comparison of the putative promoter sequences has identified both shared and divergent sequence elements which are likely responsible, respectively, for the conserved and divergent patterns of expression observed. The entire coding sequences of the pseudoobscura and melanogaster Gld genes are presented and shown to encode a 612-amino-acid pre-protein. The inferred amino acid sequences are 92% conserved between the two species. In general the intronic regions of Gld are unusually well conserved.     

Evolution of the expression of the Gld gene in the reproductive tract of Drosophila.

During the preadult development of Drosophila melanogaster, the GLD (glucose dehydrogenase) gene (Gld) is expressed in a variety of tissues, including the immature reproductive tract. At the adult stage the expression of Gld becomes largely restricted to the reproductive tract of males and females. We examined the expression of GLD in the adult reproductive tract of 50 species in the genus Drosophila, as well as in those of a few representative species from four other closely related genera. GLD exhibits considerable organ-specific diversity in the reproductive tract of males and females. Among these species, five male GLD phenotypes and six female GLD phenotypes were found. In contrast, the preadult expression of GLD in representative species from each distinct adult pattern type was determined and found to be highly conserved in both the immature reproductive tract and non-reproductive organs. Moreover, the set of reproductive organs that express GLD during preadult development is equivalent to the sum of the five male and six female adult GLD phenotypes. To initially define the contribution of cis- versus trans-acting factors responsible for differences in adult GLD expression between two of these species--D. melanogaster and D. pseudoobscura--we transferred the D. pseudoobscura Gld to the genome of D. melanogaster and investigated its expression. GLD expression patterns of these transformants displayed characteristics that are unique to both species, suggesting the presence of both cis- and trans-acting differences between these two species.     

Organ-specific patterns of gene expression in the reproductive tract of Drosophila are regulated by the sex-determination genes

The sex-determination genes of Drosophila act to repress the developmental pathway for the internal somatic reproductive organs of the opposite sex. By misregulating this pathway during preadult development, the organ-specific expression pattern of the glucose dehydrogenase gene (Gld) in the reproductive tract of adult flies has been changed without a concomitant sexual transformation of the reproductive organs. Misregulation of the tra, tra-2, and dsx genes leads to very similar patterns of ectopic expression of Gld. The induced ectopic patterns of Gld expression at the adult stage occur in a small subset of organs which all normally express the Gld gene during their morphogenesis. These ectopic patterns are irrevocably set during late larval-early pupal development. The normal pattern of Gld expression in several other Drosophila species is quite similar to the ectopic patterns which we have generated in D. melanogaster, suggesting that the interspecific variation in Gld expression may result from variation in the expression of the sex-determination genes.     

Chromatin Loops as Allosteric Modulators of Enhancer-Promoter Interactions

The classic model of eukaryotic gene expression requires direct spatial contact between a distal enhancer and a proximal promoter. Recent Chromosome Conformation Capture (3C) studies show that enhancers and promoters are embedded in a complex network of looping interactions. Here we use a polymer model of chromatin fiber to investigate whether, and to what extent, looping interactions between elements in the vicinity of an enhancer-promoter pair can influence their contact frequency. Our equilibrium polymer simulations show that a chromatin loop, formed by elements flanking either an enhancer or a promoter, suppresses enhancer-promoter interactions, working as an insulator. A loop formed by elements located in the region between an enhancer and a promoter, on the contrary, facilitates their interactions. We find that different mechanisms underlie insulation and facilitation; insulation occurs due to steric exclusion by the loop, and is a global effect, while facilitation occurs due to an effective shortening of the enhancer-promoter genomic distance, and is a local effect. Consistently, we find that these effects manifest quite differently for in silico 3C and microscopy. Our results show that looping interactions that do not directly involve an enhancer-promoter pair can nevertheless significantly modulate their interactions. This phenomenon is analogous to allosteric regulation in proteins, where a conformational change triggered by binding of a regulatory molecule to one site affects the state of another site.     

The Drosophila Pox neuro gene: control of male courtship behavior and fertility as revealed by a complete dissection of all enhancers

We have dissected the entire cis-regulatory region of the Drosophila Pox neuro gene with regard to its enhancers, and have analyzed their functions by the selective addition to Pox neuro null mutant flies of one or several functions, each regulated by a complete or partial enhancer. We have identified at least 15 enhancers with an astounding complexity in arrangement and substructure that regulate Pox neuro functions required for the development of the peripheral and central nervous system and of most appendages. Many of these functions are essential for normal male courtship behavior and fertility. Two enhancers regulate the development of the penis, claspers and posterior lobes of male genitalia. Three enhancers, two of which overlap, control the development of chemosensory bristles in the labellum, legs and wings, some or all of which are required for the transmission of gustatory signals elicited by female pheromones. An additional enhancer regulates in the developing brain the connectivity of two specific neuronal clusters entrusted with processing olfactory pheromone signals from the antennal nerve. Finally, functions crucial for the ability of the male to copulate depend on an enhancer that activates Pox neuro expression in the embryonic ventral cord. In addition to these male courtship and fertility functions of Pox neuro, we have identified enhancers that regulate: (1) proper segmentation of tarsal segments in the leg disc and in homologous segments of the antennal disc; and (2) proper development of the wing hinge and hence the ability of the fly to fly.     

Promoter and enhancer elements from the rat elastase I gene function independently of each other and of heterologous enhancers.

An elastase-human growth hormone (hGH) fusion gene containing 205 base pairs of elastase 5' flanking region is expressed exclusively in pancreatic acinar cells of transgenic mice. This paper shows that the promoter region (-72 to +8) and the enhancer (-205 to -73) function independently of each other. The elastase enhancer can activate the heterologous mouse metallothionein gene and the hGH gene promoters; conversely, enhancers from the thymocyte-specific murine leukemia virus MCF13 and the metal regulatory elements from the metallothionein gene can activate the elastase promoter in a variety of cell types. Combinations of immunoglobulin and elastase enhancers with a heterologous promoter and the hGH gene result in expression in all of the tissues predicted by the sum of each enhancer acting alone. Thus these enhancer elements act independently of each other, suggesting that they do not have silencing activity in cells in which they are normally inactive.