Action at a distance in Mu DNA transposition: an enhancer-like element is the site of action of supercoiling relief activity by integration host factor (IHF).

The first committed step in the in vitro strand transfer reaction of a mini-Mu donor molecule is the formation of a Type 1 complex in which the Mu ends are held together in a non-covalent protein-DNA complex. Efficient formation of this complex at high levels of donor supercoiling (sigma approximately -0.06) requires the Mu A and Escherichia coli HU proteins. At in vivo levels of supercoiling, efficient reaction also requires E. coli integration host factor (IHF). We demonstrate that this supercoiling relief activity of IHF is mediated through an IHF binding site in the Mu early promoter region. This site is part of a larger enhancer-like element which includes operator 1 (01) and part of operator 2 (02) with the IHF site in between. The enhancer-like element stimulates the initial rate of the in vitro reaction 100-fold and acts in a distance-independent fashion. Inversion of the orientation of the element results in a total loss of enhancer activity in the absence of IHF. However, a 10-fold stimulation in the initial rate of reaction is induced by the addition of IHF. Furthermore, correct helical phasing between 01 and 02 is required for maximal activity. The results indicate that a specific geometrical configuration of the enhancer-like element, which includes a sharp bend between 01 and 02, is required for optimal induction of synapsis.     

Transpososomes: stable protein-DNA complexes involved in the in vitro transposition of bacteriophage Mu DNA

We report that two types of stable protein-DNA complexes, or transpososomes, are generated in vitro during the Mu DNA strand transfer reaction. The Type 1 complex is an intermediate in the reaction. Its formation requires a supercoiled mini-Mu donor plasmid, Mu A and HU protein, and Mg2+. In the Type 1 complex the two ends of Mu are held together, creating a figure eight-shaped molecule with two independent topological domains; the Mu sequences remain supercoiled while the vector DNA is relaxed because of nicking. In the presence of Mu B protein, ATP, target DNA, and Mg2+, the Type 1 complex is converted into the protein-associated product of the strand transfer reaction. In this Type 2 complex, the target DNA has been joined to the Mu DNA ends held in the synaptic complex at the center of the figure eight. Supercoils are not required for the latter reaction.     

The Mu transpositional enhancer can function in trans: requirement of the enhancer for synapsis but not strand cleavage.

The phage Mu transpositional enhancer has been previously shown to stimulate the initial rate of the Mu DNA strand transfer reaction by a factor of 100. We now show that the Mu enhancer can function in trans on an unlinked DNA molecule. This activity is greatly facilitated by the presence of a free DNA end proximal to the enhancer element. Function of the enhancer in trans does not alter either the requirement for donor DNA supercoiling or for the two Mu ends to be in their proper orientation on the donor plasmid. An important consequence of these findings is that we have been able to evaluate directly the step in the transposition reaction for which the enhancer is required. We show that the role of the enhancer is limited to promoting productive synapsis; efficient strand cleavage can occur in the absence of the enhancer.     

Immunoelectron microscopic analysis of the A, B, and HU protein content of bacteriophage Mu transpososomes

Stable protein-DNA complexes or transpososomes mediate the Mu DNA strand transfer reaction in vitro (Surette, M. G., Buch, S. J., and Chaconas, G. (1987) Cell 49, 253-262; Craigie, R., and Mizuuchi, K. (1987) Cell 51, 493-501). Formation of the Type 1 complex, an intermediate in the strand transfer reaction, requires the Mu A and Escherichia coli HU proteins. Generation of the Type 2 complex, in which the Mu ends have been covalently linked to the target DNA, requires the Mu B protein, ATP, and target DNA in addition to A and HU. The protein content of these higher order synaptic complexes has been studied by immunoelectron microscopy using protein A-colloidal gold conjugates to visualize antibody-bound complexes. Under our in vitro transposition conditions, Type 1 complexes were found to contain A and HU; in addition, Type 2 complexes contained Mu B. However, both the HU and the Mu B protein were found to be loosely associated and could be quantitatively removed from the nucleoprotein core of both complexes by incubation in 0.5 M NaCl. Depletion of HU from the Type 1 complex did not affect the ability of this complex to be converted into the strand-transferred product. Hence, the indispensable role of the HU protein in the Mu DNA strand transfer reaction is limited to the formation of the Type 1 transpososome.     

Stimulation of the Mu DNA strand cleavage and intramolecular strand transfer reactions by the Mu B protein is independent of stable binding of the Mu B protein to DNA.

Interactions between the Mu A and Mu B proteins are important in the early steps of the in vitro transposition of a mini-Mu plasmid. We have examined these interactions by assaying Mu B stimulation of Mu A-mediated strand cleavage and strand transfer reactions. We have previously shown that in the presence of ATP the Mu B protein can stimulate the Mu A-directed cleavage reaction of mini-Mu plasmids carrying a terminal base pair mutation (Surette, M.G., Harkness, T., and Chaconas, G. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 3118-3124). Here we demonstrate that in the absence of a non-Mu DNA target molecule the Mu B protein stimulates intramolecular integration of a mini-Mu in an ATP-dependent fashion. Furthermore, modification of the Mu B protein with N-ethylmaleimide severely compromises the ability of B to form a stable complex with DNA; however, the modified protein stimulates the strand cleavage and intramolecular strand transfer reactions as efficiently as the untreated protein. These results indicate that the Mu B protein is capable of stimulating the Mu A protein through direct interaction in the absence of stable Mu B-DNA complex formation. Our results increase the spectrum of Mu B protein activities and uncouple the stimulatory properties of the Mu B protein from stable DNA binding but not the ATP cofactor requirement.     

TraY and integration host factor oriT binding sites and F conjugal transfer: sequence variations, but not altered spacing, are tolerated

Bacterial conjugation is the process by which a single strand of a conjugative plasmid is transferred from donor to recipient. For F plasmid, TraI, a relaxase or nickase, binds a single plasmid DNA strand at its specific origin of transfer (oriT) binding site, sbi, and cleaves at a site called nic. In vitro studies suggest TraI is recruited to sbi by its accessory proteins, TraY and integration host factor (IHF). TraY and IHF bind conserved oriT sites sbyA and ihfA, respectively, and bend DNA. The resulting conformational changes may propagate to nic, generating the single-stranded region that TraI can bind. Previous deletion studies performed by others showed transfer efficiency of a plasmid containing F oriT decreased progressively as increasingly longer segments, ultimately containing both sbyA and ihfA, were deleted. Here we describe our efforts to more precisely define the role of sbyA and ihfA by examining the effects of multiple base substitutions at sbyA and ihfA on binding and plasmid mobilization. While we observed significant decreases in in vitro DNA-binding affinities, we saw little effect on plasmid mobilization even when sbyA and ihfA variants were combined. In contrast, when half or full helical turns were inserted between the relaxosome protein-binding sites, mobilization was dramatically reduced, in some cases below the detectable limit of the assay. These results are consistent with TraY and IHF recognizing sbyA and ihfA with limited sequence specificity and with relaxosome proteins requiring proper spacing and orientation with respect to each other.     

Transposition of Mu DNA: joining of Mu to target DNA can be uncoupled from cleavage at the ends of Mu

Transposition of Mu involves transfer of the 3' ends of Mu DNA to the 5' ends of a staggered cut in the target DNA. We find that cleavage at the 3' ends of Mu DNA precedes cutting of the target DNA. The resulting nicked species exists as a noncovalent nucleoprotein complex in which the two Mu ends are held together. This cleaved donor complex completes strand transfer when a target DNA, Mu B protein, and ATP are provided. Mu end DNA sequences that have been precisely cut at their 3' ends by a restriction endonuclease, instead of by Mu A protein and HU, are efficiently transferred to a target DNA upon subsequent incubation with Mu A protein, Mu B protein, and ATP. Cleavage of the Mu ends therefore cannot be energetically coupled with joining these ends to a target DNA. We discuss the DNA strand transfer mechanism in view of these results, and propose a model involving direct transfer of the 5' ends of the cut target DNA, from their original partners, to the 3' ends of Mu.     

Supercoiling-dependent site-specific binding of HU to naked Mu DNA.

Using HU chemical nucleases to probe HU-DNA interactions, we report here for the first time site-specific binding of HU to naked DNA. An unique feature of this interaction is the absolute requirement for negative DNA supercoiling for detectable levels of site-specific DNA binding. The HU binding site is the Mu spacer between the L1 and L2 transposase binding sites. Our results suggest recognition of an altered DNA structure which is induced by DNA supercoiling. We propose that recruitment of HU to this naked DNA site induces the DNA bending required for productive synapsis and transpososome assembly. Implications of HU as a supercoiling sensor with a potential in vivo regulatory role are discussed. Finally, using HU nucleases we have also shown that non-specific DNA binding by HU is stimulated by increasing levels of supercoiling.     

The F plasmid-encoded TraM protein stimulates relaxosome-mediated cleavage at oriT through an interaction with TraI

Conjugative DNA transfer is a highly conserved process for the direct transfer of DNA from a donor to a recipient. The conjugative initiator proteins are key players in the DNA processing reactions that initiate DNA transfer - they introduce a site- and strand-specific break in the DNA backbone via a transesterification that leaves the initiator protein covalently bound on the 5'-end of the cleaved DNA strand. The action of the initiator protein at the origin of transfer (oriT) is governed by auxiliary proteins that alter the architecture of the DNA molecule, allowing binding of the initiator protein. In the F plasmid system, two auxiliary proteins have roles in establishing the relaxosome: the host-encoded IHF and the plasmid-encoded TraY. Together, these proteins direct the loading of TraI which contains the catalytic centre for the transesterification. The F-oriT sequence includes a binding site for another plasmid-encoded protein, TraM, which is required for DNA transfer. Here the impact of TraM protein on the formation and activity of the F plasmid relaxosome has been examined. Purified TraM stimulates the formation of relaxed DNA in a reaction that requires the minimal components of the relaxosome, TraI, TraY and IHF. Unlike TraY and IHF, TraM is not essential for the formation of the relaxosome in vitro and TraM cannot substitute for either TraY or IHF in this process. The TraM binding site sbmC, along with both IHF binding sites, is essential for stimulation of the relaxase reaction. In addition, stimulation of transesterification appears to require the C-terminal domain of TraI suggesting that TraM and TraI may interact through this domain on TraI. Taken together, these results provide additional evidence of a role for TraM as a component of the relaxosome, suggest a previously unknown interaction between TraI and TraM, and allow us to propose a molecular role for the C-terminal domain of TraI.     

Chimeric HU-IHF proteins that alter DNA-binding ability.

Chimeric proteins between Escherichia coli histone-like HU and IHF were constructed by genetic engineering, in which part of the arm region was replaced by the corresponding region of IHF alpha (designated as HupANhimA) or IHF beta (HupANhimD); alternatively, an alpha-helix 2-beta 1 region was replaced by the corresponding region of IHF alpha (HupAXhimA) or IHF beta (HupAXhimD) (symbols N and X indicate NotI and XhoI junctions). These proteins were synthesized in a hupA-hupB double-deletion mutant. HupANhimA exhibited marked reduction in nonspecific DNA binding in vitro, and a drastic loss of HU activity in replicative transposition of Mu phage in vivo. HupANhimD also showed a significant reduction in the ability for DNA binding, though this protein supported Mu phage development. In contrast, the other two chimeric HU proteins showed only slight changes in nonspecific DNA-binding ability: they retained activities for transposition of Mu phage in vivo. These observations confirm that the flexible arm of HU-2, a domain proposed for DNA binding [Tanaka et al., Nature 310 (1984) 376-381; Goshima et al., Gene 96 (1990) 141-145], plays an important role in the physiological function of this protein. The results indicate that a unique conformation of the arm structure of HU protein, particularly the N-terminal half of a two-strand antiparallel beta-ribbon of the structure, is important for the DNA-binding ability of this protein.     

IHF protein inhibits cleavage but not assembly of plasmid R388 relaxosomes

Relaxosomes are specific nucleoprotein structures involved in DNA-processing reactions during bacterial conjugation. In this work, we present evidence indicating that plasmid R388 relaxosomes are composed of origin of transfer (oriT) DNA plus three proteins TrwC relaxase, TrwA nic-cleavage accessory protein and integration host factor (IHF), which acts as a regulatory protein. Protein IHF bound to two sites (ihfA and ihfB) in R388 oriT, as shown by gel retardation and DNase I footprinting analysis. IHF binding in vitro was found to inhibit nic-cleavage, but not TrwC binding to supercoiled DNA. However, no differences in the frequency of R388 conjugation were found between IHF- and IHF+ donor strains. In contrast, examination of plasmid DNA obtained from IHF- strains revealed that R388 was obtained mostly in relaxed form from these strains, whereas it was mostly supercoiled in IHF+ strains. Thus, IHF could have an inhibitory role in the nic-cleavage reaction in vivo. It can be speculated that triggering of conjugative DNA processing during R388 conjugation can be mediated by IHF release from oriT.     

Involvement of integration host factor (IHF) in maintenance of plasmid pSC101 in Escherichia coli: mutations in the topA gene allow pSC101 replication in the absence of IHF.

Integration host factor (IHF), encoded by the himA and himD genes, is a histonelike DNA-binding protein that participates in many cellular functions in Escherichia coli, including the maintenance of plasmid pSC101. We have isolated and characterized a chromosomal mutation that compensates for the absence of IHF and allows the maintenance of wild-type pSC101 in him mutants, but does not restore IHF production. The mutation is recessive and was found to affect the gene topA, which encodes topoisomerase I, a protein that relaxes negatively supercoiled DNA and acts in concert with DNA gyrase to regulate levels of DNA supercoiling. A previously characterized topA mutation, topA10, could also compensate for the absence of IHF to allow pSC101 replication. IHF-compensating mutations affecting topA resulted in a large reduction in topoisomerase I activity, and plasmid DNA isolated from such strains was more negatively supercoiled than DNA from wild-type strains. In addition, our experiments show that both pSC101 and pBR322 plasmid DNAs isolated from him mutants were of lower superhelical density than DNA isolated from Him+ strains. A concurrent gyrB gene mutation, which reduces supercoiling, reversed the ability of topA mutations to compensate for a lack of him gene function. Together, these findings indicate that the topological state of the pSC101 plasmid profoundly influences its ability to be maintained in populations of dividing cells and suggest a model to account for the functional interactions of the him, rep, topA, and gyr gene products in pSC101 maintenance.     

Requirement for Vibrio cholerae integration host factor in conjugative DNA transfer

The requirement for host factors in the transmission of integrative and conjugative elements (ICEs) has not been extensively explored. Here we tested whether integration host factor (IHF) or Fis, two host-encoded nucleoid proteins, are required for transfer of SXT, a Vibrio cholerae-derived ICE that can be transmitted to many gram-negative species. Fis did not influence the transfer of SXT to or from V. cholerae. In contrast, IHF proved to be required for V. cholerae to act as an SXT donor. In the absence of IHF, V. cholerae displayed a modest defect for serving as an SXT recipient. Surprisingly, SXT integration into or excision from the V. cholerae chromosome, which requires an SXT-encoded integrase related to lambda integrase, did not require IHF. Therefore, the defect in SXT transmission in the V. cholerae IHF mutant is probably not related to IHF's ability to promote DNA recombination. The V. cholerae IHF mutant was also highly impaired as a donor of RP4, a broad-host-range conjugative plasmid. Thus, the V. cholerae IHF mutant appears to have a general defect in conjugation. Escherichia coli IHF mutants were not impaired as donors or recipients of SXT or RP4, indicating that IHF is a V. cholerae-specific conjugation factor.     

The P1 plasmid partition complex at parS. The influence of Escherichia coli integration host factor and of substrate topology

The P1 ParB protein is required for active partition and thus stable inheritance of the plasmid prophage. ParB and the Escherichia coli protein integration host factor (IHF) participate in the assembly of a partition complex at the centromere-like site parS. In this report the role of IHF in the formation of the partition complex has been explored. First, ParB protein was purified for these studies, which revealed that ParB forms a dimer in solution. Next, the IHF binding site was mapped to a 29-base pair region within parS, including the sequence TAACTGACTGTTT (which differs from the IHF consensus in two positions). IHF induced a strong bend in the DNA at its binding site. Versions of parS which have lost or damaged the IHF binding site bound ParB with greatly reduced affinity in vitro and in vivo. Measurements of binding constants showed that IHF increased ParB affinity for the wild-type parS site by about 10,000-fold. Finally, DNA supercoiling improved ParB binding in the presence of IHF but not in its absence. These observations led to the proposal that IHF and superhelicity assist ParB by promoting its precise positioning at parS, a spatial arrangement that results in a high affinity of ParB for parS.     

Increase in negative supercoiling of plasmid DNA in Escherichia coli exposed to cold shock

Negative supercoiling of plasmid DNA in Escherichia coli cells can decrease transiently when exposed to heat shock. The effect of cold shock on DNA supercoiling was examined, and analysis by agarose gel electrophoresis in the presence of chloroquine revealed that negative supercoiling of plasmid DNA in cells increased when cells were exposed to cold shock. This increase was transient and was nil when the cells were pretreated with nalidixic acid, an inhibitor of DNA gyrase. In a mutant deficient in expression of HU protein, the increase in negative supercoiling of DNA by cold shock is less apparent than in wild-type cells. It is proposed that DNA gyrase and HU protein have a role in the DNA supercoiling reaction seen with cold shock.