Fibroblast adhesion to RGDS shows novel features compared with fibronectin

As previously shown by others, the fibroblast attachment and spreading activity of fibronectin is mimicked by a short peptide (RGDS or longer) from the cell binding domain. Normal rat kidney fibroblasts showed similar attachment kinetics on either peptide GRGDSC or bovine plasma fibronectin and binding to either substratum was inhibited by peptide alone. We now demonstrate, however, considerable differences in biological activity between peptide and fibronectin. In particular, cells developed novel adhesion structures on peptide-coated substrata. Interference reflection microscopy showed a predominance of small round dark grey/black patches of adherent membrane ("spots") with relatively few focal adhesions, which occurred only at the outermost cell margins in contrast to their distribution in cells spread on fibronectin. The spots were resistant to detergent extraction and stained less strongly or not at all for vinculin. Electron microscopy in vertical thin section showed that the ventral surface of the cell was characterized by "point-contacts", corresponding in size to the spot structures seen by interference reflection microscopy, and which were only occasionally associated with microfilaments. Cells also required a higher substratum loading of peptide than fibronectin to promote spreading and proceeded to spread less rapidly and to a lesser extent, developing very few and extremely fine actin cables.     

Cooperativity between integrin activation and mechanical stress leads to integrin clustering

Integrins are transmembrane receptors involved in crucial cellular biological functions such as migration, adhesion, and spreading. Upon the modulation of integrin affinity toward their extracellular ligands by cytoplasmic proteins (inside-out signaling) these receptors bind to their ligands and cluster into nascent adhesions. This clustering results in the increase in the mechanical linkage among the cell and substratum, cytoskeleton rearrangements, and further outside-in signaling. Based on experimental observations of the distribution of focal adhesions in cells attached to micropatterned surfaces, we introduce a physical model relying on experimental numerical constants determined in the literature. In this model, allosteric integrin activation works in synergy with the stress build by adhesion and the membrane rigidity to allow the clustering to nascent adhesions independently of actin but dependent on the integrin diffusion onto adhesive surfaces. The initial clustering could provide a template to the mature adhesive structures. Predictions of our model for the organization of focal adhesions are discussed in comparison with experiments using adhesive protein microarrays.     

Focal adhesion sites and the removal of substratum-bound fibronectin

Fibronectin was not removed from the substratum beneath focal adhesion sites when fibroblasts spread in serum-free medium on adsorbed fibronectin substrata, or when fibroblasts spread in serum-containing medium on covalently cross-linked fibronectin substrata. Under these conditions, there was colocalization between 140-kD fibronectin receptors and focal adhesion sites. It was concluded that removal of adsorbed fibronectin from beneath focal adhesion sites was a mechanical process that required serum. The effect of serum was nonspecific since serum could be replaced by equivalent concentrations of serum albumin, ovalbumin, or gamma globulins. Quantitative measurements indicated that the presence of proteins in the incubation medium weakens the interaction of fibronectin with the substratum, thereby allowing the adsorbed protein to be removed from the substratum at sites of high stress. After removing fibronectin from the substratum, cells reorganized this material into patches and fibrils beneath cells, and the reorganized fibronectin colocalized with fibronectin receptors. Some of the patches of fibronectin were phagocytosed. The fibronectin fibrils were observed to be in register with actin filament bundles and sometimes translocated to the upper cell surfaces. It is proposed that removal of fibronectin from beneath focal adhesion sites is an example of how cells can modify their extracellular matrices through contractile activity.     

Focal adhesions: structure and dynamics

Interactions of cells with the extracellular matrix are essential for the control of tissue remodelling, cell migration, and embryogenesis. At the cell-extracellular matrix contact points, specialized structures are formed and termed focal adhesions, where transmembrane adhesion receptors provide a structural link between the actin cytoskeleton and the extracellular matrix components. Numerous structural and regulatory proteins assemble at the cytoplasmic face of focal adhesions in a Rho-dependent fashion.     

Stages in specialization of fibroblast adhesion and deposition of extracellular matrix

Fibroblast cells seeded on a serum glycoprotein shown previously to mediate a spread shape without focal adhesions or microfilament bundles (Stage 1 spread) are now shown to have substratum contacts in which coated pits are abundant and associated with small globular deposits of glycocalyx bridging to substratum and staining for fibronectin and acidic glycoconjugates. After stimulation with serum or fibronectin to form focal adhesions and microfilament bundles (Stage 2 spread), clathrin-based structures remain at the cell underside but no longer in conspicuously higher concentration than on the dorsal surface; extracellular material at adhesions is now as regular strands which stain for acidic glycoconjugates but (as reported earlier by Chen and Singer) not always for fibronectin. During these stages of adhesion, striking changes are seen in the cellular display of fibronectin monitored by immunofluorescence. In rounded cells this is granular and cytoplasmic, concentrated around the submembranous cortex; on spreading to Stage 1, it remains granular and intracellular but is now oriented strongly towards the lower cell surface; only in Stage 2 does externalisation proceed to deposit fibrillar fibronectin on the substratum. While cytoplasmic orientation of matrix precursors can be determined by cell contact, organised externalisation is therefore coupled to fully developed adhesion status.     

Fibronectin receptor exhibits high lateral mobility in embryonic locomoting cells but is immobile in focal contacts and fibrillar streaks in stationary cells

The dynamic process of embryonic cell motility was investigated by analyzing the lateral mobility of the fibronectin receptor in various locomotory or stationary avian embryonic cells, using the technique of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching. The lateral mobility of fibronectin receptors, labeled by a monoclonal antibody, was defined by the diffusion coefficient and mobile fraction of these receptors. Even though the lateral diffusion coefficient did not vary appreciably (2 X 10(-10) cm2/S less than or equal to D less than or equal to 4 X 10(-10) cm2/S) with the locomotory state and the cell type, the mobile fraction was highly dependent on the degree of cell motility. In locomoting cells, the population of fibronectin receptors, which was uniformly distributed on the cell surface, displayed a high mobile fraction of 66 +/- 19% at 25 degrees C (82 +/- 14% at 37 degrees C). In contrast, in nonmotile cells, the population of receptors was concentrated in focal contacts and fibrillar streaks associated with microfilament bundles and, in these sites, the mobile fraction was small (16 +/- 8%). When cells were in a stage intermediate between highly motile and stationary, the population of fibronectin receptors was distributed both in focal contacts with a small mobile fraction and in a diffuse pattern with a reduced mobile fraction (33 +/- 9%) relative to the diffuse population in highly locomotory cells. The mobile fraction of the fibronectin receptor was found to be temperature dependent in locomoting but not in stationary cells. The mobile fraction could be modulated by affecting the interaction between the receptor and the substratum. The strength of this interaction could be increased by growing cells on a substratum coated with polyclonal antibodies to the receptor. This caused the mobile fraction to decrease. The interaction could be decreased by using a probe, monoclonal antibodies to the receptor known to perturb the adhesion of certain cell types which caused the mobile fraction to increase. From these results, we conclude that in locomoting embryonic cells, most fibronectin receptors can readily diffuse in the plane of the membrane. This degree of lateral mobility may be correlated to the labile adhesions to the substratum presumably required for high motility. In contrast, fibronectin receptors in stationary cells are immobilized in focal contacts and fibrillar streaks which are in close association with both extracellular and cytoskeletal structures; these stable complexes appear to provide firm anchorage to the substratum.     

The coordination between actin filaments and adhesion in mesenchymal migration

Mesenchymal cell motility is characterized by a polarized distribution of actin filaments, with a network of short branched actin filaments at the leading edge, and polymers of actin filaments arranged into distinct classes of actin stress fibres behind the leading edge. Importantly, the distinct actin filaments are characteristically associated with discrete adhesion structures and both the adhesions and the actin filaments are co-ordinately regulated during cell migration. While it has long been known that these macromolecular structures are intimately linked in cells, precisely how they are co-ordinately regulated is presently unknown. Live imaging data now suggests that the focal adhesions may act as sites of actin polymerization resulting in the generation of tension-bearing actin bundles of actin filaments (stress fibres). Moreover, a picture is emerging to suggest that the tropomyosin family of proteins that can determine actin filament dynamics may also play a key role in determining the transition between adhesion states. Molecules such as the tropomyosins are therefore tantalizing candidates to orchestrate the coordination of actin and adhesion dynamics during mesenchymal cell migration.     

A new type of substratum adhesion structure in NRK cells revealed by correlated interference reflection and electron microscopy

The substratum adherent membrane of NRK cells in vitro has been studied using correlated interference reflection and surface replica electron microscopy. Structures visualized by interference reflection microscopy were identified in the subsequently prepared platinum-carbon replicas of the adherent membranes. Substratum adherent membranes were prepared using a hypotonic shock/cell shearing technique (lysis-squirting). Typically 20% of the original ventral membrane surface area and 50% of the original focal adhesion number were retained. Microfilament bundle termini, clathrin-coated sheets and pits, cytotic vesicles having a ridged surface and groups of membrane associated particles were well preserved in the replicas. Two types of isolated adhesion structures were found after lysis-squirting. In addition to typical elongate focal adhesions containing actin and vinculin, we report the existence of adherent membrane patches lacking microfilament bundles and negative for vinculin labelling, but coated with clathrin and identifiable in interference reflection microscopy as less dark than focal adhesions and having dot, U- or sinusoidal shapes.     

Dissecting focal adhesions in cells differentially expressing calreticulin: a microscopy study

Background information. Our previous studies have shown that calreticulin, a Ca²⁺‐binding chaperone located in the endoplasmic reticulum, affects cell—substratum adhesions via the induction of vinculin and N‐cadherin. Cells overexpressing calreticulin contain more vinculin than low expressers and make abundant contacts with the substratum. However, cells that express low levels of calreticulin exhibit a weak adhesive phenotype and make few, if any, focal adhesions. To date, the identity of the types of focal adhesions made by calreticulin overexpressing and low expressing cells has not been dissected. Results. The results of the present study show that calreticulin affects fibronectin matrix assembly in L fibroblast cell lines that differentially express the protein, and that these cells also differ profoundly in focal adhesion formation. Although the calreticulin overexpressing cells generate numerous interference‐reflection‐microscopy‐dark, vinculin‐ and paxillin‐containing classical focal contacts, as well as some fibrillar adhesions, the cells expressing low levels of calreticulin generate only a few weak focal adhesions. The fibronectin receptor was found to be clustered in calreticulin overexpressing cells, but diffusely distributed over the cell surface in low expressing cells. Plating L fibroblasts on fibronectin‐coated substrata induced extensive spreading in all cell lines tested. However, although calreticulin overexpressing cells were induced to form classical vinculin‐rich focal contacts, the low calreticulin expressing cells overcame their weak adhesive phenotype by induction of many tensin‐rich fibrillar adhesions, thus compensating for the low level of vinculin in these cells. Conclusions. We propose that calreticulin affects fibronectin production and, thereby, assembly, and it indirectly influences the formation and/or stability of focal contacts and fibrillar adhesions, both of which are instrumental in matrix assembly and remodelling.     

Regulation of integrin-mediated adhesion at focal contacts by cyclic AMP

Cyclic AMP (cAMP) elevation causes diverse types of cultured cells to round partially and develop arborized cell processes. Renal glomerular mesangial cells are smooth, muscle-like cells and in culture contain abundant actin microfilament cables that insert into substratum focal contacts. cAMP elevation causes adhesion loss, microfilament cable fragmentation, and shape change in cultured mesangial cells. We investigated the roles of the classical vitronectin (αVβ3 integrin) and fibronectin (α5β1 integrin) receptors in these changes. Mesangial cells on vitronectin-rich substrata contained microfilament cables that terminated in focal contacts that stained with antibodies to vitronectin receptor. cAMP elevation caused loss of focal contact and associated vitronectin receptor. Both fibronectin and its receptor stained in a fibrillary pattern at the cell surface under control conditions but appeared aggregated along the cell processes after cAMP elevation. This suggested that cAMP elevation caused loss of adhesion mediated by vitronectin receptor but not by fibronectin receptor. We plated cells onto fibronectin-coated slides to test the effect of ligand immobilization on the cellular response to cAMP. On fibronectin-coated slides fibronectin receptor was observed in peripheral focal contacts where actin filaments terminated, as seen with vitronectin receptor on vitronectin-coated substrata, and in abundant linear arrays distributed along microfilaments as well. Substratum contacts mediated by fibronectin receptor along the length of actin filaments have been termed fibronexus contacts. After cAMP elevation, microfilaments fragmented and fibronectin receptor disappeared from peripheral focal contacts, but the more central contacts along residual microfilament fragments appeared intact. Also, substratum adhesion was maintained after cAMP elevation on fibronectin—but not on vitronectincoated surfaces. Although other types of extracellular matrix receptors may also be involved, our observations suggest that cAMP regulates adhesion at focal contacts but not at fibronexus-type extracellular matrix contacts. © 1993 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Mapping the dynamics of shear stress-induced structural changes in endothelial cells

Hemodynamic shear stress regulates endothelial cell biochemical processes that govern cytoskeletal contractility, focal adhesion dynamics, and extracellular matrix (ECM) assembly. Since shear stress causes rapid strain focusing at discrete locations in the cytoskeleton, we hypothesized that shear stress coordinately alters structural dynamics in the cytoskeleton, focal adhesion sites, and ECM on a time scale of minutes. Using multiwavelength four-dimensional fluorescence microscopy, we measured the displacement of rhodamine-fibronectin and green fluorescent protein-labeled actin, vimentin, paxillin, and/or vinculin in aortic endothelial cells before and after onset of steady unidirectional shear stress. In the cytoskeleton, the onset of shear stress increased actin polymerization into lamellipodia, altered the angle of lateral displacement of actin stress fibers and vimentin filaments, and decreased centripetal remodeling of actin stress fibers in subconfluent and confluent cell layers. Shear stress induced the formation of new focal complexes and reduced the centripetal remodeling of focal adhesions in regions of new actin polymerization. The structural dynamics of focal adhesions and the fibronectin matrix varied with cell density. In subconfluent cell layers, shear stress onset decreased the displacement of focal adhesions and fibronectin fibrils. In confluent monolayers, the direction of fibronectin and focal adhesion displacement shifted significantly toward the downstream direction within 1 min after onset of shear stress. These spatially coordinated rapid changes in the structural dynamics of cytoskeleton, focal adhesions, and ECM are consistent with focusing of mechanical stress and/or strain near major sites of shear stress-mediated mechanotransduction.     

Syndecans promote integrin-mediated adhesion of mesenchymal cells in two distinct pathways

Syndecans are transmembrane proteoglycans that support integrin-mediated adhesion. Well documented is the contribution of syndecan-4 that interacts through its heparan sulphate chains to promote focal adhesion formation in response to fibronectin domains. This process has requirements for integrin and signaling through the cytoplasmic domain of syndecan-4. Here an alternate pathway mediated by the extracellular domains of syndecans-2 and -4 is characterized that is independent of both heparan sulphate and syndecan signaling. This pathway is restricted to mesenchymal cells and was not seen in any epithelial cell line tested, apart from vascular endothelia. The syndecan ectodomains coated as substrates promoted integrin-dependent attachment, spreading and focal adhesion formation. Syndecan-4 null cells were competent, as were fibroblasts compromised in heparan sulphate synthesis that were unable to form focal adhesions in response to fibronectin. Consistent with actin cytoskeleton organization, the process required Rho-GTP and Rho kinase. While syndecan-2 and -4 ectodomains could both promote integrin-mediated adhesion, their pathways were distinct, as shown by competition assays. Evidence for an indirect interaction of beta1 integrin with both syndecan ectodomains was obtained, all of which suggests a distinct mechanism of integrin-mediated adhesion.     

Cell adhesion to fibronectin and tenascin: quantitative measurements of initial binding and subsequent strengthening response

Cell-substratum adhesion strengths have been quantified using fibroblasts and glioma cells binding to two extracellular matrix proteins, fibronectin and tenascin. A centrifugal force-based adhesion assay was used for the adhesive strength measurements, and the corresponding morphology of the adhesions was visualized by interference reflection microscopy. The initial adhesions as measured at 4 degrees C were on the order of 10(-5)dynes/cell and did not involve the cytoskeleton. Adhesion to fibronectin after 15 min at 37 degrees C were more than an order of magnitude stronger; the strengthening response required cytoskeletal involvement. By contrast to the marked strengthening of adhesion to FN, adhesion to TN was unchanged or weakened after 15 min at 37 degrees C. The absolute strength of adhesion achieved varied according to protein and cell type. When a mixed substratum of fibronectin and tenascin was tested, the presence of tenascin was found to reduce the level of the strengthening of cell adhesion normally observed at 37 degrees C on a substratum of fibronectin alone. Parallel analysis of corresponding interference reflection micrographs showed that differences in the area of cell surface within 10-15 nm of the substratum correlated closely with each of the changes in adhesion observed: after incubation for 15 min on fibronectin at 37 degrees C, glioma cells increased their surface area within close contact to the substrate by integral to 125- fold. Cells on tenascin did not increase their surface area of contact. The increased surface area of contact and the inhibitory activity of cytochalasin b suggest that the adhesive "strengthening" in the 15 min after initial binding brings additional adhesion molecules into the adhesive site and couples the actin cytoskeleton to the adhesion complex.     

Contact formation by fibroblasts adhering to heparan sulfate-binding substrata (fibronectin or platelet factor 4)

The process of cell-substratum adhesion of BALB/c 3T3 fibroblasts on fibronectin (FN)-coated substrata was compared with that of cells adhering to substrata coated with the heparan sulfate (HS)-binding protein, platelet factor four (PF4). FN has binding domains for HS and an unidentified cell surface receptor, whereas PF4 binds to only HS on the surface of the cell. The attachment and early spreading sequences of cells on either substratum were similar as shown by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Within 2 h of spreading, cells on FN developed typical fibroblastic morphologies, whereas those on PF4 lacked polygonal orientations and formed numerous broadly spread lamellae. Interference reflection microscopic analysis indicated that PF4-adherent cells formed only close adhesive contacts, whereas FN-adherent cells formed both close contacts and tight focal contacts. Cells on either substratum responded to Ca2+ chelation with EGTA by rounding up, but remained adherent to the substratum by relatively EGTA-resistant regions of the cell's undersurface, demonstrating that cell surface HS by binding to an appropriate substratum is capable of initiating a Ca2+-dependent spreading response. The EGTA-resistant substratum-attached material on PF4 was morphologically similar to that on FN, the latter of which was derived from both tight focal contacts and discrete specializations within certain close contacts. These studies show that heparan sulfate proteoglycans on the surface of these cells can participate in the formation of close contact adhesions by binding to an appropriate substratum and suggest that sub-specializations within close contact adhesions may evolve into tight focal contacts by the participation of an unidentified cell surface receptor which binds specifically to fibronectin but not to PF4. In addition, the functional role of FN in tight focal contact formation is demonstrated.     

The relationship between force and focal complex development

To adhere and migrate, cells must be capable of applying cytoskeletal force to the extracellular matrix (ECM) through integrin receptors. However, it is unclear if connections between integrins and the ECM are immediately capable of transducing cytoskeletal contraction into migration force, or whether engagement of force transmission requires maturation of the adhesion. Here, we show that initial integrin-ECM adhesions become capable of exerting migration force with the recruitment of vinculin, a marker for focal complexes, which are precursors of focal adhesions. We are able to induce the development of focal complexes by the application of mechanical force to fibronectin receptors from inside or outside the cell, and we are able to extend focal complex formation to vitronectin receptors by the removal of c-Src. These results indicate that cells use mechanical force as a signal to strengthen initial integrin-ECM adhesions into focal complexes and regulate the amount of migration force applied to individual adhesions at localized regions of the advancing lamella.     

Adhesion and cytoskeletal organisation of fibroblasts in response to fibronectin fragments.

Fibronectin has been shown previously to promote complete cell adhesion in the absence of other serum components or de novo protein synthesis. Recently a sequence of four amino acids from the cell-binding domain of fibronectin has been termed the 'cell recognition site' of this multidomain molecule since it mediates cell attachment and inhibits cell adhesion to intact fibronectin. We show here, however, that substrata coated with an isolated cell-binding domain of fibronectin are not sufficient for complete cell adhesion; cells attach and spread but, unlike those adhering to intact fibronectin, they do not form stress fibres terminating in focal adhesions. An additional external stimulus is needed for this cytoskeletal reorganisation and may be provided by one of two heparin-binding fragments of fibronectin. The two 'signals' required for complete adhesion need not be provided simultaneously since focal adhesion formation can be promoted by stimulating cells pre-spread on a cell-binding fragment of fibronectin with a soluble heparin-binding fragment. This second stimulation may involve cell membrane heparan sulphate proteoglycans.     

The removal of extracellular fibronectin from areas of cell-substrate contact

Immunofluorescent labeling for fibronectin was largely excluded from sites of closest contact between spreading chicken gizzard fibroblasts and the substratum. This was observed by double immunofluorescent labeling of fixed cells for fibronectin and vinculin, a smooth muscle intracellular protein that is specifically associated with focal adhesion plaques, in conjunction with interference-reflection microscopy. When the cells were plated on a fibronectin-coated substratum they adhered to its surface and rapidly spread on it. The immunofluorescent labeling for fibronectin in those cultures (after fixation and triton permeabilization) was usually absent from the newly formed, vinculin-containing focal adhesion plaques. We have found, however, that the accessibility to the cell-substrate gap at the focal adhesion plaques is limited and therefore a more direct approach was adopted. We have found that cells spreading on a substrate coated with rhodamine-labeled fibronectin progressively removed the underlying protein from the substrate. The removal of fibronectin involved at least two distinct mechanisms. Part of the substrate-associated fibronectin was removed from small areas and displaced toward the cell center. The arrowhead-shaped areas from which fibronectin was removed often coincided with vinculin-rich focal contacts. We observed, however, many areas where focal contacts were found over unperturbed fibronectin carpet, as well as fibronectin-free areas with no overlapping focal contacts. The possibilities that fibronectin is actively displaced from areas of cell-substrate contact, that the focal adhesion plaques are transiently associated with these areas and their implications on the dynamics of cell spreading and locomotion are discussed. The second route of fibronectin removal from the substrate was endocytosis. The rhodamine-labeled fibronectin was found in the cells in a partial or transient association with clathrin-containing structures.     

Initiation of attachment and generation of mature focal adhesions by integrin-containing filopodia in cell spreading

Integrin receptors, and associated cytoplasmic proteins mediate adhesion, cell signaling and connections to the cytoskeleton. Using fluorescent protein chimeras, we analyzed initial integrin adhesion in spreading fibroblasts with Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy. Surprisingly, sequential radial projection of integrin and actin containing filopodia formed the initial cell-matrix contacts. These Cdc42-dependent, integrin-containing projections recruited cytoplasmic focal adhesion (FA) proteins in a hierarchical manner; initially talin with integrin and subsequently FAK and paxillin. Radial FA structures then anchored cortical actin bridges between them and subsequently cells reorganized their actin, a process promoted by Src, and characterized by lateral FA reorientation to provide anchor points for actin stress fibers. Finally, the nascent adhesions coalesced until they formed mature FAs.     

Targeting of cytoskeletal linker proteins to focal adhesion complexes is reduced in fibroblasts adhering to laminin-1 when compared to fibronectin

Cellular interactions with the extracellular matrix determine to a large extent cell behavior, including cell migration. These interactions take place at specialized cellular structures, the focal adhesions, which have a substrate-specific morphology. To determine the molecular and functional relevance of this observation, the composition of isolated focal adhesions developed by fibroblasts adhering to fibronectin or laminin-1 was analyzed by indirect immunofluorescence and immunoblotting with or without stabilization of the structures by cross-linking. In the absence of cross-linking, integrins, talin, vinculin and, to a lower extent, paxillin remained associated with the focal adhesions formed on both substrates, indicating a tight association of these proteins with the extracellular matrix support. By contrast, alpha-actinin, FAK, and actin were apparently loosely maintained within focal adhesions and were found associated to these structures only after stabilization by cross-linking. Interestingly, although both substrates induced clustering and aggregation of all these proteins, their relative concentration, with the exception of alpha-actinin, was lower within the focal adhesions formed on laminin-1 than in those formed on fibronectin. Moreover, as assessed in migration assays, the locomotory speed of fibroblasts was higher on laminin-1 than on fibronectin. Altogether these results indicate that integrins involved in cellular interactions with fibronectin or laminin-1 trigger the formation of focal adhesion structures which differ by molecular organization, concentration in several adhesion plaque components, and function.     

Syndesmos, a syndecan-4 cytoplasmic domain interactor, binds to the focal adhesion adaptor proteins paxillin and Hic-5.

Syndecan-4 and integrins are the primary transmembrane receptors of focal adhesions in cells adherent to extracellular matrix molecules. Syndesmos is a cytoplasmic protein that interacts specifically with the cytoplasmic domain of syndecan-4, and it co-localizes with syndecan-4 in focal contacts. In the present study we sought possible interactors with syndesmos. We find that syndesmos interacts with the focal adhesion adaptor protein paxillin. The binding of syndesmos to paxillin is direct, and these interactions are triggered by the activation of protein kinase C. Syndesmos also binds the paxillin homolog, Hic-5. The connection of syndecan-4 with paxillin through syndesmos parallels the connection between paxillin and integrins and may thus reflect the cooperative signaling of these two receptors in the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers.