Fine-tuning function: correlation of hinge domain interactions with functional distinctions between LacI and PurR

LacI and PurR are highly homologous proteins. Their functional units are homodimers, with an N-terminal DNA binding domain that comprises the helix-turn-helix (HTH), N-linker, and hinge regions from both monomers. Hinge structural changes are known to occur upon DNA dissociation but are difficult to monitor experimentally. The initial steps of hinge unfolding were therefore examined using molecular dynamics simulations, utilizing a truncated, chimeric protein comprising the LacI HTH/N-linker and PurR hinge. A terminal Gly-Cys-Gly was added to allow "dimerization" through disulfide bond formation. Simulations indicate that differences in LacI and PurR hinge primary sequence affect the quaternary structure of the hinge x hinge' interface. However, these alternate hinge orientations would be sterically restricted by the core domain. These results prompted detailed comparison of recently available DNA-bound structures for LacI and truncated LacI(1-62) with the PurR structure. Examination revealed that different N-linker and hinge contacts to the core domain of the partner monomer (which binds effector molecule) affect the juxtapositions of the HTH, N-linker, and hinge regions in the DNA binding domain. In addition, the two full-length repressors exhibit significant differences in the interactions between the core and the C-linker connection to the DNA binding domain. Both linkers and the hinge have been implicated in the allosteric response of these repressors. Intriguingly, one functional difference between these two proteins is that they exhibit opposite allosteric response to effector. Simulations and observed structural distinctions are correlated with mutational analysis and sequence information from the LacI/GalR family to formulate a mechanism for fine-tuning individual repressor function.     

Parallel evolution of ligand specificity between LacI/GalR family repressors and periplasmic sugar-binding proteins

The bacterial LacI/GalR family repressors such as lactose operon repressor (LacI), purine nucleotide synthesis repressor (PurR), and trehalose operon repressor (TreR) consist of not only the N-terminal helix-turn-helix DNA-binding domain but also the C-terminal ligand-binding domain that is structurally homologous to periplasmic sugar-binding proteins. These structural features imply that the repressor family evolved by acquiring the DNA-binding domain in the N-terminal of an ancestral periplasmic binding protein (PBP). Phylogenetic analysis of the LacI/GalR family repressors and their PBP homologues revealed that the acquisition of the DNA-binding domain occurred first in the family, and ligand specificity then evolved. The phylogenetic tree also indicates that the acquisition occurred only once before the divergence of the major lineages of eubacteria, and that the LacI/GalR and the PBP families have since undergone extensive gene duplication/loss independently along the evolutionary lineages. Multiple alignments of the repressors and PBPs furthermore revealed that repressors and PBPs with the same ligand specificity have the same or similar residues in their binding sites. This result, together with the phylogenetic relationship, demonstrates that the repressors and the PBPs individually acquired the same ligand specificity by homoplasious replacement, even though their genes are encoded in the same operon.     

Engineered disulfide linking the hinge regions within lactose repressor dimer increases operator affinity, decreases sequence selectivity, and alters allostery.

The hinge domain encompasses amino acids 51-60 of lactose repressor (LacI) and plays an important role in its regulatory interaction with operator DNA. This segment makes both hinge-DNA and hinge-hinge' contacts that are critical to DNA binding. Furthermore, this small region serves as a central element in communicating the allosteric response to inducer. Introducing a disulfide bond between partner hinges within a dimer via the mutation V52C results in a protein that has increased affinity for O(1) operator DNA compared to wild-type LacI and abolishes allosteric response to inducer [Falcon, C. M., Swint-Kruse, L., and Matthews, K. S. (1997) J. Biol. Chem. 272, 26818]. We have established that this high affinity is maintained for the disulfide-linked protein even when symmetry and half-site spacing within the operator region are altered, whereas binding by the reduced protein, as for wild-type LacI, is severely diminished by these alterations. Interestingly, the allosteric response to inducer for V52C-oxidized remains intact for a small group of operator variants. Temperature studies demonstrate that the presence of the disulfide alters the thermodynamics of the protein-DNA interaction, with a DeltaC(p) of significantly smaller magnitude compared to wild-type LacI. The results presented here establish the hinge region as an important element not only for LacI high-affinity operator binding but also for the essential communication between ligand binding domains. Moreover, the results confirm that DNA sequence/conformation can profoundly influence allostery for this prototypic regulatory protein.     

Conformational changes of ribose-binding protein and two related repressors are tailored to fit the functional need

The structures and conformational changes of the periplasmic ribose-binding protein and two repressors, PurR and LacI, were compared. Although the closed, ligand-bound structures of the three proteins are very similar, they differ greatly in the degree and direction in which they open, as well as in the amount of internal rearrangement within the domains during that process. Water molecules and a relatively symmetrical inter-domain connection region assist in the large opening observed for the binding protein, while the design of the repressors appears to preclude such dramatic movements. The dimeric nature of the latter proteins, an important aspect in their binding of pseudo-symmetrical DNA sequences, also appears to be a determinant in the allowed motion. Slight differences in the structure of PurR and LacI explain how they can converge to a similar DNA-binding state in response to different binding states of their small molecule effector.     

Operator DNA sequence variation enhances high affinity binding by hinge helix mutants of lactose repressor protein

The mechanism by which genetic regulatory proteins discern specific target DNA sequences remains a major area of inquiry. To explore in more detail the interplay between DNA and protein sequence, we have examined binding of variant lac operator DNA sequences to a series of mutant lactose repressor proteins (LacI). These proteins were altered in the C-terminus of the hinge region that links the N-terminal DNA binding and core sugar binding domains. Variant operators differed from the wild-type operator, O(1), in spacing and/or symmetry of the half-sites that contact the LacI N-terminal DNA binding domain. Binding of wild-type and mutant proteins was affected differentially by variations in operator sequence and symmetry. While the mutant series exhibits a 10(4)-fold range in binding affinity for O(1) operator, only a approximately 20-fold difference in affinity is observed for a completely symmetric operator, O(sym), used widely in studies of the LacI protein. Further, DNA sequence influenced allosteric response for these proteins. Binding of this LacI mutant series to other variant operator DNA sequences indicated the importance of symmetry-related bases, spacing, and the central base pair sequence in high affinity complex formation. Conformational flexibility in the DNA and other aspects of the structure influenced by the sequence may establish the binding environment for protein and determine both affinity and potential for allostery.     

Structural characterization and corepressor binding of the Escherichia coli purine repressor.

The Escherichia coli purine repressor, PurR, binds to a 16-bp operator sequence and coregulates the genes for de novo synthesis of purine and pyrimidine nucleotides, formation of a one-carbon unit for biosynthesis, and deamination of cytosine. We have characterized the purified repressor. Chemical cross-linking indicates that PurR is dimeric. Each subunit has an N-terminal domain of 52 amino acids for DNA binding and a C-terminal 289-residue domain for corepressor binding. Each domain was isolated after cleavage by trypsin. Sites for dimer formation are present within the corepressor binding domain. The corepressors hypoxanthine and guanine bind cooperatively to distinct sites in each subunit. Competition experiments indicate that binding of one purine abolishes cooperativity and decreases the affinity and the binding of the second corepressor. Binding of each corepressor results in a conformation change in the corepressor binding domain that was detected by intrinsic fluorescence of three tryptophan residues. These experiments characterize PurR as a complex allosteric regulatory protein.     

Lactose repressor hinge domain independently binds DNA

The short 8–10 amino acid “hinge” sequence in lactose repressor (LacI), present in other LacI/GalR family members, links DNA and inducer‐binding domains. Structural studies of full‐length or truncated LacI‐operator DNA complexes demonstrate insertion of the dimeric helical “hinge” structure at the center of the operator sequence. This association bends the DNA ～40° and aligns flanking semi‐symmetric DNA sites for optimal contact by the N‐terminal helix‐turn‐helix (HtH) sequences within each dimer. In contrast, the hinge region remains unfolded when bound to nonspecific DNA sequences. To determine ability of the hinge helix alone to mediate DNA binding, we examined (i) binding of LacI variants with deletion of residues 1–50 to remove the HtH DNA binding domain or residues 1–58 to remove both HtH and hinge domains and (ii) binding of a synthetic peptide corresponding to the hinge sequence with a Val52Cys substitution that allows reversible dimer formation via a disulfide linkage. Binding affinity for DNA is orders of magnitude lower in the absence of the helix‐turn‐helix domain with its highly positive charge. LacI missing residues 1–50 binds to DNA with ～4‐fold greater affinity for operator than for nonspecific sequences with minimal impact of inducer presence; in contrast, LacI missing residues 1–58 exhibits no detectable affinity for DNA. In oxidized form, the dimeric hinge peptide alone binds to O1 and nonspecific DNA with similarly small difference in affinity; reduction to monomer diminished binding to both O1 and nonspecific targets. These results comport with recent reports regarding LacI hinge interaction with DNA sequences.     

Ion concentration and temperature dependence of DNA binding: comparison of PurR and LacI repressor proteins.

Purine repressor (PurR) binding to specific DNA is enhanced by complexing with purines, whereas lactose repressor (LacI) binding is diminished by interaction with inducer sugars despite 30% identity in their protein sequences and highly homologous tertiary structures. Nonetheless, in switching from low- to high-affinity DNA binding, these proteins undergo a similar structural change in which the hinge region connecting the DNA and effector binding domains folds into an alpha-helix and contacts the DNA minor groove. The differences in response to effector for these proteins should be manifest in the polyelectrolyte effect which arises from cations displaced from DNA by interaction with positively charged side chains on a protein and is quantitated by measurement of DNA binding affinity as a function of ion concentration. Consistent with structural data for these proteins, high-affinity operator DNA binding by the PurR-purine complex involved approximately 15 ion pairs, a value significantly greater than that for the corresponding state of LacI (approximately 6 ion pairs). For both proteins, however, conversion to the low-affinity state results in a decrease of approximately 2-fold in the number of cations released per dimeric DNA binding site. Heat capacity changes (DeltaC(p)) that accompany DNA binding, derived from buried apolar surface area, coupled folding, and restriction of motional freedom of polar groups in the interface, also reflect the differences between these homologous repressor proteins. DNA binding of the PurR-guanine complex is accompanied by a DeltaC(p) (-2.8 kcal mol(-1) K(-1)) more negative than that observed previously for LacI (-0.9 to -1.5 kcal mol(-1) K(-1)), suggesting that more extensive protein folding and/or enhanced structural rigidity may occur upon DNA binding for PurR compared to DNA binding for LacI. The differences between these proteins illustrate plasticity of function despite high-level sequence and structural homology and undermine efforts to predict protein behavior on the basis of such similarities.     

Crystal structure of the effector-binding domain of the trehalose-repressor of Escherichia coli, a member of the LacI family, in its complexes with inducer trehalose-6-phosphate and noninducer trehalose.

The crystal structure of the Escherichia coli trehalose repressor (TreR) in a complex with its inducer trehalose-6-phosphate was determined by the method of multiple isomorphous replacement (MIR) at 2.5 A resolution, followed by the structure determination of TreR in a complex with its noninducer trehalose at 3.1 A resolution. The model consists of residues 61 to 315 comprising the effector binding domain, which forms a dimer as in other members of the LacI family. This domain is composed of two similar subdomains each consisting of a central beta-sheet sandwiched between alpha-helices. The effector binding pocket is at the interface of these subdomains. In spite of different physiological functions, the crystal structures of the two complexes of TreR turned out to be virtually identical to each other with the conformation being similar to those of the effector binding domains of the LacI and PurR in complex with their effector molecules. According to the crystal structure, the noninducer trehalose binds to a similar site as the trehalose portion of trehalose-6-phosphate. The binding affinity for the former is lower than for the latter. The noninducer trehalose thus binds competitively to the repressor. Unlike the phosphorylated inducer molecule, it is incapable of blocking the binding of the repressor headpiece to its operator DNA. The ratio of the concentrations of trehalose-6-phosphate and trehalose thus is used to switch between the two alternative metabolic uses of trehalose as an osmoprotectant and as a carbon source.     

Crystallization and preliminary X-ray studies on the co-repressor binding domain of the Escherichia coli purine repressor.

The purine repressor is a putative helix-turn-helix DNA-binding protein that regulates several genetic loci important in purine and pyrimidine metabolism in Escherichia coli. The protein is composed of two domains, an N-terminal DNA-binding domain and a C-terminal core that binds the purine co-repressors, guanine and hypoxanthine. The co-repressor binding domain (residues 53 to 341) has been crystallized from polyethylene glycol 600-MgCl2 solutions. They are of the monoclinic form, space group P2(1), with a = 38.2 A, b = 125.7 A, c = 61.8 A and beta = 100.2 degrees. They diffract to a resolution of at least 2.2 A and contain two monomers per asymmetric unit. The importance of the structural determination of this domain is underscored by the high degree of sequence homology displayed within the effector binding sites among a sub-class of helix-turn-helix proteins, of which LacI and GalR are members. The structure of the PurR co-repressor binding domain will provide a high resolution view of one such domain and could serve as a possible model for future effector site structural determinations. Perhaps more important will be this structure's contribution to the further understanding of how protein-DNA interactions are modulated.     

The affinity-enhancing roles of flexible linkers in two-domain DNA-binding proteins.

Recently many attempts have been made to design high-affinity DNA-binding proteins by linking two domains. Here a theory for guiding these designs is presented. Flexible linkers may play three types of roles: (a) linking domains which by themselves are unfolded and bind to DNA only as a folded dimer (as in a designed single-chain Arc repressor), (b) connecting domains which can separately bind to DNA (as in the Oct-1 POU domain), and (c) linking a DNA-binding domain with a dimerization domain (as in the lambda repressor). In (a), the linker keeps the protein as a folded dimer so that it is always DNA-binding-competent. In (b), the linker is predicted to enhance DNA-binding affinity over those of the individual domains (with dissociation constants K(A) and K(B)) by p(d(0))/K(B) or p(d(0))/K(A), where p(d(0)) = (3/4pil(p)bL)(3/2) exp(-3d(0)(2)/4l(p)bL)(1 - 5l(p)/4bL +...) is the probability density for the end-to-end vector of the linker with L residues to have a distance d(0). In (c), the linker is predicted to enhance the binding affinity by K(d)(C)/p(d(0)), where K(d)(C) is the dimer dissociation constant for the dimerization domain. The predicted affinity enhancements are found to be actually reached by the Oct-1 POU domain and lambda repressor. However, there is room for improvement in many of the recently designed proteins. The theoretical limits presented should provide a useful guide for current efforts of designing DNA-binding proteins.