Effects of biological DNA precursor pool asymmetry upon accuracy of DNA replication in vitro

Deoxyguanosine triphosphate is underrepresented among the four common deoxyribonucleoside triphosphates (dNTPs), typically accounting for just 5-10% of the total dNTP pool. We have asked whether this pool asymmetry affects the fidelity of DNA replication, by use of an in vitro assay in which an M13 phagemid containing the Escherichia coli lacZalpha gene and an SV40 replication origin is replicated by extracts of human cells. By monitoring reversion of either a TGA or TAA codon within the lacZalpha gene, we found that replication in "biologically biased" dNTPs, representing our estimate of the concentrations in HeLa cell nuclei, is not significantly more accurate than when measured in reaction mixtures containing the four dNTPs at equimolar concentrations. However, sequence analysis of revertants revealed significantly different patterns of mispairing events leading to mutation. During replication at biased dNTP levels, mutations at the site 5' to C in the template strand for the TGA triplet were less frequent than seen in equimolar reaction mixtures, suggesting that extension from mismatches at this site is relatively slow, and proofreading efficiency high, when dGTP is the next nucleotide to be incorporated. Mismatches opposite template C, which might have been favored by the low physiological concentrations of dGTP, were not favored in our in vitro system, although one particular substitution at this site, TGA-->TTA, was strongly favored at low [dGTP]. An excess of one dNTP was found in our system to be more mutagenic than a corresponding deficiency. We also estimated dNTP concentrations in non-transformed human fibroblasts and found that in vitro replication at these levels caused significantly fewer mutations than we observed under equimolar conditions (100 microM each dNTP). This increased replication fidelity may result from increased proofreading efficiency at the lower dNTP levels; however, replication rates were decreased only slightly at these non-transformed fibroblast concentrations.     

Application of an in vitro system in the study of chemotherapeutic drug effects on DNA replication

DNA replication machinery is an important target for chemotherapeutic drugs. We have used an in vitro system to study the effect of drugs on mammalian DNA replication, either by direct interaction with the DNA structure or with replication proteins and machinery. The anthracycline doxorubicin (Dox) showed a dose-dependent inhibitory effect on DNA replication, whether incubated with HeLa cell extracts or with DNA and nucleotides. Earliest-labeled fragment analysis revealed that inhibition of replication began within the origin-containing fragment in both control and Dox-containing reactions in vitro. AraC, a nucleoside analog, had no significant effect on DNA synthesis. In contrast, araCTP was able to inhibit DNA replication in vitro. Since metabolism is diminished in this in vitro system, the degree of phosphorylation of araC was apparently low. Progesterone showed an increase in nucleotide incorporation (sensitive to BuPdGTP inhibition of replication-specific polymerases α and δ) after preincubation with HeLa cell extracts, although progesterone receptors were not detectable in the HeLa cell extracts. In addition, we observed an inhibition in DNA replication when progesterone was preincubated with DNA and nucleotides. These results suggest that progesterone may have a mechanism of action that is different from any known to be mediated through progesterone receptors. In conclusion, these results indicate that this mammalian in vitro replication system will be useful for the study of mechanisms and design of therapeutic drugs that inhibit mammalian DNA replication. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Identification of multiprotein complexes containing DNA replication factors by native immunoblotting of HeLa cell protein preparations with T-antigen-dependent SV40 DNA replication activity

Increasing evidence has supported the concept that many of the enzymes and factors involved in the replication of mammalian DNA function together as a multiprotein complex. We have previously reported on the partial purification of a multiprotein form of DNA polymerase from human HeLa cells shown to be fully competent to support origin-specific large T-antigen-dependent simian virus 40 (SV40) DNA replication in vitro. In an attempt to more definitively identify the complex or complexes responsible for DNA replication in vitro, partially purified human HeLa cell protein preparations competent to replicate DNA in vitro were subjected to native polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and electrophoretically transferred to nitrocellulose. The Native Western blots were probed with a panel of antibodies directed against proteins believed to be required for DNA replication in vitro. Apparent complexes of 620 kDa and 500 kDa were identified by monoclonal antibodies directed against DNA polymerase α and DNA polymerase δ, respectively. To detect epitopes possibly unexposed within the native multiprotein complexes, blots were also analyzed following denaturation in situ following treatment with detergent and reducing agent. The epitope or access to the epitope recognized by the monoclonal antibody against DNA polymerase α was destroyed by exposure of the blots to denaturing conditions. In contrast, an epitope present on a very large complex of approximately 1000 kDa was recognized by a monoclonal antibody against proliferating cell nuclear antigen only following treatment of the native immunoblots with denaturing agents. Identification of these complexes will allow their further purification, characterization, and elucidation of their role in the replication of DNA. © 1996 Wiley-Liss, Inc.     

Genomic specification and epigenetic regulation of eukaryotic DNA replication origins

Identification of DNA replication origins (ORIs) at a genome-wide level in eukaryotes has proved to be difficult due to the high degree of degeneracy of their sequences. Recent structural and functional approaches, however, have circumvented this limitation and have provided reliable predictions of their genomic distribution in the yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Schizosaccharomyces pombe, and they have also significantly increased the number of characterized ORIs in animals. This article reviews recent evidence on how ORIs are specified and maintained in these systems and on their regulation and sensitivity to epigenetic signals. It also discusses the possible additional involvement of ORIs in processes other than DNA replication.     

DNA polymerase κ‐dependent DNA synthesis at stalled replication forks is important for CHK1 activation

Formation of primed single‐stranded DNA at stalled replication forks triggers activation of the replication checkpoint signalling cascade resulting in the ATR‐mediated phosphorylation of the Chk1 protein kinase, thus preventing genomic instability. By using siRNA‐mediated depletion in human cells and immunodepletion and reconstitution experiments in Xenopus egg extracts, we report that the Y‐family translesion (TLS) DNA polymerase kappa (Pol κ) contributes to the replication checkpoint response and is required for recovery after replication stress. We found that Pol κ is implicated in the synthesis of short DNA intermediates at stalled forks, facilitating the recruitment of the 9‐1‐1 checkpoint clamp. Furthermore, we show that Pol κ interacts with the Rad9 subunit of the 9‐1‐1 complex. Finally, we show that this novel checkpoint function of Pol κ is required for the maintenance of genomic stability and cell proliferation in unstressed human cells.     

Histone H4K20 tri‐methylation at late‐firing origins ensures timely heterochromatin replication

Among other targets, the protein lysine methyltransferase PR‐Set7 induces histone H4 lysine 20 monomethylation (H4K20me1), which is the substrate for further methylation by the Suv4‐20h methyltransferase. Although these enzymes have been implicated in control of replication origins, the specific contribution of H4K20 methylation to DNA replication remains unclear. Here, we show that H4K20 mutation in mammalian cells, unlike in Drosophila, partially impairs S‐phase progression and protects from DNA re‐replication induced by stabilization of PR‐Set7. Using Epstein–Barr virus‐derived episomes, we further demonstrate that conversion of H4K20me1 to higher H4K20me2/3 states by Suv4‐20h is not sufficient to define an efficient origin per se, but rather serves as an enhancer for MCM2‐7 helicase loading and replication activation at defined origins. Consistent with this, we find that Suv4‐20h‐mediated H4K20 tri‐methylation (H4K20me3) is required to sustain the licensing and activity of a subset of ORCA/LRWD1‐associated origins, which ensure proper replication timing of late‐replicating heterochromatin domains. Altogether, these results reveal Suv4‐20h‐mediated H4K20 tri‐methylation as a critical determinant in the selection of active replication initiation sites in heterochromatin regions of mammalian genomes.     

The MMS22L–TONSL heterodimer directly promotes RAD51‐dependent recombination upon replication stress

Homologous recombination (HR) is a key pathway that repairs DNA double‐strand breaks (DSBs) and helps to restart stalled or collapsed replication forks. How HR supports replication upon genotoxic stress is not understood. Using in vivo and in vitro approaches, we show that the MMS22L–TONSL heterodimer localizes to replication forks under unperturbed conditions and its recruitment is increased during replication stress in human cells. MMS22L–TONSL associates with replication protein A (RPA)‐coated ssDNA, and the MMS22L subunit directly interacts with the strand exchange protein RAD51. MMS22L is required for proper RAD51 assembly at DNA damage sites in vivo, and HR‐mediated repair of stalled forks is abrogated in cells expressing a MMS22L mutant deficient in RAD51 interaction. Similar to the recombination mediator BRCA2, recombinant MMS22L–TONSL limits the assembly of RAD51 on dsDNA, which stimulates RAD51‐ssDNA nucleoprotein filament formation and RAD51‐dependent strand exchange activity in vitro. Thus, by specifically regulating RAD51 activity at uncoupled replication forks, MMS22L–TONSL stabilizes perturbed replication forks by promoting replication fork reversal and stimulating their HR‐mediated restart in vivo.     

RADX interacts with single‐stranded DNA to promote replication fork stability

Single‐stranded DNA (ssDNA) regions form as an intermediate in many DNA‐associated transactions. Multiple cellular proteins interact with ssDNA via the oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide‐binding (OB) fold domain. The heterotrimeric, multi‐OB fold domain‐containing Replication Protein A (RPA) complex has an essential genome maintenance role, protecting ssDNA regions from nucleolytic degradation and providing a recruitment platform for proteins involved in responses to replication stress and DNA damage. Here, we identify the uncharacterized protein RADX (CXorf57) as an ssDNA‐binding factor in human cells. RADX binds ssDNA via an N‐terminal OB fold cluster, which mediates its recruitment to sites of replication stress. Deregulation of RADX expression and ssDNA binding leads to enhanced replication fork stalling and degradation, and we provide evidence that a balanced interplay between RADX and RPA ssDNA‐binding activities is critical for avoiding these defects. Our findings establish RADX as an important component of cellular pathways that promote DNA replication integrity under basal and stressful conditions by means of multiple ssDNA‐binding proteins.     

Inhibition of DNA replication in vitro by pefloxacin

Pefloxacin (a novel quinolone antibiotic) is demonstrated to be a drug inhibiting DNA replication 10-times more efficiently than oxolinic acid measured either in toluene-treated E. coli or in an in vitro replication system for oriC plasmids [6]. DNA repair synthesis is not inhibited by the drug.     

Replication of ColE2 and ColE3 plasmids In vitro replication dependent on plasmid-coded proteins

Summary We developed an in vitro replication system for ColE2 and ColE3 plasmids using cell extracts prepared from bacteria with or without these plasmids. DNA synthesis depended on host DNA polymerase I and was sensitive to rifampicin and chloramphenicol. Preincubation of the extracts with plasmid DNA, however, allowed replication of template DNA added subsequently in a plasmid-specific manner in the presence of rifampicin and chloramphenicol. The plasmid-specified trans-acting factor(s) was detected in cell extracts from bacteria carrying a recombinant plasmid with the region of ColE2 or ColE3 encoding the Rep protein. The plasmid-specified factor(s) consisted at least in part of protein, probably the Rep protein. In vitro replication started within a region of ColE2 or ColE3 containing the smallest cis-acting segment essential for in vivo replication and proceeded in a fixed direction.     

SCFDia2 regulates DNA replication forks during S‐phase in budding yeast

Dia2 is an F‐box protein, which is involved in the regulation of DNA replication in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. The function of Dia2, however, remains largely unknown. In this study, we report that Dia2 is associated with the replication fork and regulates replication fork progression. Using modified yeast two‐hybrid screening, we have identified components of the replisome (Mrc1, Ctf4 and Mcm2), as Dia2‐binding proteins. Mrc1 and Ctf4 were ubiquitinated by SCF^Dia2 both in vivo and in vitro. Domain analysis of Dia2 revealed that the leucine‐rich repeat motif was indispensable for the regulation of replisome progression, whereas the tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR) motif was involved in the interaction with replisome components. In addition, the TPR motif was shown to be involved in Dia2 stability; deleting the TPR stabilized Dia2, mimicking the effect of DNA damage. ChIP‐on‐chip analysis illustrated that Dia2 localizes to the replication fork and regulates fork progression on hydroxyurea treatment. These results demonstrate that Dia2 is involved in the regulation of replisome activity through a direct interaction with replisome components.     

The positioning and dynamics of origins of replication in the budding yeast nucleus

We have analyzed the subnuclear position of early- and late-firing origins of DNA replication in intact yeast cells using fluorescence in situ hybridization and green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged chromosomal domains. In both cases, origin position was determined with respect to the nuclear envelope, as identified by nuclear pore staining or a NUP49-GFP fusion protein. We find that in G1 phase nontelomeric late-firing origins are enriched in a zone immediately adjacent to the nuclear envelope, although this localization does not necessarily persist in S phase. In contrast, early firing origins are randomly localized within the nucleus throughout the cell cycle. If a late-firing telomere-proximal origin is excised from its chromosomal context in G1 phase, it remains late-firing but moves rapidly away from the telomere with which it was associated, suggesting that the positioning of yeast chromosomal domains is highly dynamic. This is confirmed by time-lapse microscopy of GFP-tagged origins in vivo. We propose that sequences flanking late-firing origins help target them to the periphery of the G1-phase nucleus, where a modified chromatin structure can be established. The modified chromatin structure, which would in turn retard origin firing, is both autonomous and mobile within the nucleus.     

Distinct populations of human PCNA are required for initiation of chromosomal DNA replication and concurrent DNA repair

The integrity of genomic DNA during the cell division cycle in eukaryotic cells is maintained by regulated chromosomal DNA replication and repair of damaged DNA. We have used fractionation and reconstitution experiments to purify essential factors for the initiation of human chromosomal DNA replication in late G1 phase template nuclei from human cells. Here, we report the identification of soluble PCNA as an essential initiation factor in this system. Recombinant histidine-tagged human PCNA can substitute for purified endogenous human PCNA to initiate human chromosomal DNA replication. It is recruited specifically to discrete DNA replication foci formed during initiation in vitro. The template nuclei also contain DNA breaks as result of the synchronisation procedure. A separate population of chromatin-bound PCNA is already present in these template nuclei at discrete DNA damage foci, co-localising with gamma-H2AX, RPA and Rad51. This DNA damage-associated PCNA population is marked by mono-ubiquitination, suggesting that it is involved in DNA repair. Importantly, the population of damage focus-associated PCNA is neither involved in, nor required for, the initiation of chromosomal DNA replication in the same nuclei.     

Involvement of DNA polymerase beta in DNA replication and mutagenic consequences

Overexpression in mammalian cells of the error-prone DNA polymerase beta (Pol beta) has been found to increase the spontaneous mutagenesis. Here, we investigated a possible mechanism used by Pol beta to be a genetic instability enhancer: its interference in replicative DNA synthesis, which is normally catalysed by the DNA polymerases alpha, delta and epsilon. By taking advantage of the ability to incorporate efficiently into DNA the chain terminator ddCTP as well as the oxidised nucleotide 8-oxo-dGTP, we show here that purified Pol beta can compete with the replicative DNA polymerases during replication in vitro of duplex DNA when added to human cell extracts. We found that involvement of Pol beta lowers replication fidelity and results in a modified error-specificity. Furthermore, we demonstrated that involvement of Pol beta occurred during synthesis of the lagging strand. These in vitro data provide one possible explanation of how overexpression of the enzyme could perturb the genetic instability in mammalian cells. We discuss these findings within the scope of the up-regulation of Pol beta in many cancer cells.     

Rad52 recruitment is DNA replication independent and regulated by Cdc28 and the Mec1 kinase

Recruitment of the homologous recombination machinery to sites of double‐strand breaks is a cell cycle‐regulated event requiring entry into S phase and CDK1 activity. Here, we demonstrate that the central recombination protein, Rad52, forms foci independent of DNA replication, and its recruitment requires B‐type cyclin/CDK1 activity. Induction of the intra‐S‐phase checkpoint by hydroxyurea (HU) inhibits Rad52 focus formation in response to ionizing radiation. This inhibition is dependent upon Mec1/Tel1 kinase activity, as HU‐treated cells form Rad52 foci in the presence of the PI3 kinase inhibitor caffeine. These Rad52 foci colocalize with foci formed by the replication clamp PCNA. These results indicate that Mec1 activity inhibits the recruitment of Rad52 to both sites of DNA damage and stalled replication forks during the intra‐S‐phase checkpoint. We propose that B‐type cyclins promote the recruitment of Rad52 to sites of DNA damage, whereas Mec1 inhibits spurious recombination at stalled replication forks.     

A chromatin structure‐based model accurately predicts DNA replication timing in human cells

The metazoan genome is replicated in precise cell lineage‐specific temporal order. However, the mechanism controlling this orchestrated process is poorly understood as no molecular mechanisms have been identified that actively regulate the firing sequence of genome replication. Here, we develop a mechanistic model of genome replication capable of predicting, with accuracy rivaling experimental repeats, observed empirical replication timing program in humans. In our model, replication is initiated in an uncoordinated (time‐stochastic) manner at well‐defined sites. The model contains, in addition to the choice of the genomic landmark that localizes initiation, only a single adjustable parameter of direct biological relevance: the number of replication forks. We find that DNase‐hypersensitive sites are optimal and independent determinants of DNA replication initiation. We demonstrate that the DNA replication timing program in human cells is a robust emergent phenomenon that, by its very nature, does not require a regulatory mechanism determining a proper replication initiation firing sequence.