Arrestin makes T cells stop and become active

T‐cell activation requires signaling by T‐cell receptors (TCRs) that bind antigen on the antigen‐presenting cells (APCs) at the immunological synapse (IS). Sustained signaling requires continuous supply of new TCRs to the IS. In this issue of The EMBO Journal, Fernández‐Arenas et al ( 2014 ) describe a novel role of β‐arrestin‐1 at the IS periphery: endocytosis of TCRs and chemokine CXCR4 receptors. Internalized TCRs are then delivered to the IS, where they engage antigen and support prolonged signaling, whereas CXCR4 internalization stops T‐cell migration.     

Engaged and bystander T cell receptors are down-modulated by different endocytotic pathways

T cell antigen receptor (TCR) engagement by stimulatory antibodies or its major histocompatibility complex-antigen ligand results in its down-modulation from the cell surface, a phenomenon that is thought to play a role in T cell desensitization. However, TCR engagement results in the down-modulation not only of the engaged receptors but also of non-engaged bystander TCRs. We have investigated the mechanisms that mediate the down-modulation of engaged and bystander receptors and show that co-modulation of the bystander TCRs requires protein-tyrosine kinase activity and is mediated by clathrin-coated pits. In contrast, the down-modulation of engaged TCRs is independent of protein-tyrosine kinases and clathrin pits, suggesting that this process is mediated by an alternate mechanism. Indeed, down-modulation of engaged TCRs appears to depend upon lipid rafts, because cholesterol depletion with methyl-beta-cyclodextrin completely blocks this process. Thus, two independent pathways of internalization are involved in TCR down-modulation and act differentially on directly engaged and bystander receptors. Finally, we propose that although both mechanisms coexist, the predominance of one or the other mechanisms will depend on the dose of ligand.     

Distinct roles for β‐arrestin2 and arrestin‐domain‐containing proteins in β2 adrenergic receptor trafficking

β‐arrestin 1 and 2 (also known as arrestin 2 and 3) are homologous adaptor proteins that regulate seven‐transmembrane receptor trafficking and signalling. Other proteins with predicted ‘arrestin‐like’ structural domains but lacking sequence homology have been indicated to function like β‐arrestin in receptor regulation. We demonstrate that β‐arrestin2 is the primary adaptor that rapidly binds agonist‐activated β₂ adrenergic receptors (β₂ARs) and promotes clathrin‐dependent internalization, E3 ligase Nedd4 recruitment and ubiquitin‐dependent lysosomal degradation of the receptor. The arrestin‐domain‐containing (ARRDC) proteins 2, 3 and 4 are secondary adaptors recruited to internalized β₂AR–Nedd4 complexes on endosomes and do not affect the adaptor roles of β‐arrestin2. Rather, the role of ARRDC proteins is to traffic Nedd4–β₂AR complexes to a subpopulation of early endosomes.     

β‐arrestin2/miR‐155/GSK3β regulates transition of 5′‐azacytizine‐induced Sca‐1‐positive cells to cardiomyocytes

Stem‐cell antigen 1–positive (Sca‐1+) cardiac stem cells (CSCs), a vital kind of CSCs in humans, promote cardiac repair in vivo and can differentiate to cardiomyocytes with 5′‐azacytizine treatment in vitro. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms are unknown. β‐arrestin2 is an important scaffold protein and highly expressed in the heart. To explore the function of β‐arrestin2 in Sca‐1+ CSC differentiation, we used β‐arrestin2–knockout mice and overexpression strategies. Real‐time PCR revealed that β‐arrestin2 promoted 5′‐azacytizine‐induced Sca‐1+ CSC differentiation in vitro. Because the microRNA 155 (miR‐155) may regulate β‐arrestin2 expression, we detected its role and relationship with β‐arrestin2 and glycogen synthase kinase 3 (GSK3β), another probable target of miR‐155. Real‐time PCR revealed that miR‐155, inhibited by β‐arrestin2, impaired 5′‐azacytizine‐induced Sca‐1+ CSC differentiation. On luciferase report assay, miR‐155 could inhibit the activity of β‐arrestin2 and GSK3β, which suggests a loop pathway between miR‐155 and β‐arrestin2. Furthermore, β‐arrestin2‐knockout inhibited the activity of GSK3β. Akt, the upstream inhibitor of GSK3β, was inhibited in β‐arrestin2‐Knockout mice, so the activity of GSK3β was regulated by β‐arrestin2 not Akt. We transplanted Sca‐1+ CSCs from β‐arrestin2‐knockout mice to mice with myocardial infarction and found similar protective functions as in wild‐type mice but impaired arterial elastance. Furthermore, low level of β‐arrestin2 agreed with decreased phosphorylation of AKT and increased phophorylation of GSK3β, similar to in vitro findings. The β‐arrestin2/miR‐155/GSK3β pathway may be a new mechanism with implications for treatment of heart disease.     

Kappa opioids promote the proliferation of astrocytes via Gβγ and β‐arrestin 2‐dependent MAPK‐mediated pathways

GTP binding regulatory protein (G protein)‐coupled receptors can activate MAPK pathways via G protein‐dependent and ‐independent mechanisms. However, the physiological outcomes correlated with the cellular signaling events are not as well characterized. In this study, we examine the involvement of G protein and β‐arrestin 2 pathways in kappa opioid receptor‐induced, extracellular signal‐regulated kinase 1/2 (ERK1/2)‐mediated proliferation of both immortalized and primary astrocyte cultures. As different agonists induce different cellular signaling pathways, we tested the prototypic kappa agonist, U69593 as well as the structurally distinct, non‐nitrogenous agonist, C(2)‐methoxymethyl salvinorin B (MOM‐Sal‐B). In immortalized astrocytes, U69593, activated ERK1/2 by a rapid (min) initial stimulation that was sustained over 2 h and increased proliferation. Sequestration of activated Gβγ subunits attenuated U69593 stimulation of ERK1/2 and suppressed proliferation in these cells. Furthermore, small interfering RNA silencing of β‐arrestin 2 diminished sustained ERK activation induced by U69593. In contrast, MOM‐Sal‐B induced only the early phase of ERK1/2 phosphorylation and did not affect proliferation of immortalized astrocytes. In primary astrocytes, U69593 produced the same effects as seen in immortalized astrocytes. MOM‐Sal‐B elicited sustained ERK1/2 activation which was correlated with increased primary astrocyte proliferation. Proliferative actions of both agonists were abolished by either inhibition of ERK1/2, Gβγ subunits or β‐arrestin 2, suggesting that both G protein‐dependent and ‐independent ERK pathways are required for this outcome.     

The versatility of the αβ T‐cell antigen receptor

The T‐cell antigen receptor is a heterodimeric αβ protein (TCR) expressed on the surface of T‐lymphocytes, with each chain of the TCR comprising three complementarity‐determining regions (CDRs) that collectively form the antigen‐binding site. Unlike antibodies, which are closely related proteins that recognize intact protein antigens, TCRs classically bind, via their CDR loops, to peptides (p) that are presented by molecules of the major histocompatibility complex (MHC). This TCR‐pMHC interaction is crucially important in cell‐mediated immunity, with the specificity in the cellular immune response being attributable to MHC polymorphism, an extensive TCR repertoire and a variable peptide cargo. The ensuing structural and biophysical studies within the TCR‐pMHC axis have been highly informative in understanding the fundamental events that underpin protective immunity and dysfunctional T‐cell responses that occur during autoimmunity. In addition, TCRs can recognize the CD1 family, a family of MHC‐related molecules that instead of presenting peptides are ideally suited to bind lipid‐based antigens. Structural studies within the CD1‐lipid antigen system are beginning to inform us how lipid antigens are specifically presented by CD1, and how such CD1‐lipid antigen complexes are recognized by the TCR. Moreover, it has recently been shown that certain TCRs can bind to vitamin B based metabolites that are bound to an MHC‐like molecule termed MR1. Thus, TCRs can recognize peptides, lipids, and small molecule metabolites, and here we review the basic principles underpinning this versatile and fascinating receptor recognition system that is vital to a host's survival.     

Role of the cytoplasmic tails of CXCR1 and CXCR2 in mediating leukocyte migration,activation, and regulation

IL-8 (or CXCL8) activates the receptors CXCR1 (IL-8RA) and CXCR2 (IL-8RB) to induce chemotaxis in leukocytes, but only CXCR1 mediates cytotoxic and cross-regulatory signals. This may be due to the rapid internalization of CXCR2. To investigate the roles of the intracellular domains in receptor regulation, wild-type, chimeric, phosphorylation-deficient, and cytoplasmic tail (C-tail) deletion mutants of both receptors were expressed in RBL-2H3 cells and studied for cellular activation, receptor phosphorylation, desensitization, and internalization. All but one chimeric receptor bound IL-8 and mediated signal transduction, chemotaxis, and exocytosis. Upon IL-8 activation, the chimeric receptors underwent receptor phosphorylation and desensitization. One was resistant to internalization, yet it mediated normal levels of beta-arrestin 2 (beta arr-2) translocation. The lack of internalization by this receptor may be due to its reduced association with beta arr-2 and the adaptor protein-2 beta. The C-tail-deleted and phosphorylation-deficient receptors were resistant to receptor phosphorylation, desensitization, arrestin translocation, and internalization. They also mediated greater phosphoinositide hydrolysis and exocytosis and sustained Ca(2+) mobilization, but diminished chemotaxis. These data indicate that phosphorylation of the C-tails of CXCR1 and CXCR2 are required for arrestin translocation and internalization, but are not sufficient to explain the rapid internalization of CXCR2 relative to CXCR1. The data also show that receptor internalization is not required for chemotaxis. The lack of receptor phosphorylation was correlated with greater signal transduction but diminished chemotaxis, indicating that second messenger production, not receptor internalization, negatively regulates chemotaxis.     

Regulation of lipopolysaccharide‐induced inflammatory response and endotoxemia by β‐arrestins

β‐Arrestins are scaffolding proteins implicated as negative regulators of TLR4 signaling in macrophages and fibroblasts. Unexpectedly, we found that β‐arrestin‐1 (β‐arr‐1) and ‐2 knockout (KO) mice are protected from TLR4‐mediated endotoxic shock and lethality. To identify the potential mechanisms involved, we examined the plasma levels of inflammatory cytokines/chemokines in the wild‐type (WT) and β‐arr‐1 and ‐2 KO mice after lipopolysaccharide (LPS, a TLR4 ligand) injection. Consistent with lethality, LPS‐induced inflammatory cytokine levels in the plasma were markedly decreased in both β‐arr‐1 and ‐2 KO, compared to WT mice. To further explore the cellular mechanisms, we obtained splenocytes (separated into CD11^b+ and CD11^b? populations) from WT, β‐arr‐1, and ‐2 KO mice and examined the effect of LPS on cytokine production. Similar to the in vivo observations, LPS‐induced inflammatory cytokines were significantly blocked in both splenocyte populations from the β‐arr‐2 KO compared to the WT mice. This effect in the β‐arr‐1 KO mice, however, was restricted to the CD11^b? splenocytes. Our studies further indicate that regulation of cytokine production by β‐arrestins is likely independent of MAPK and IκBα‐NFκB pathways. Our results, however, suggest that LPS‐induced chromatin modification is dependent on β‐arrestin levels and may be the underlying mechanistic basis for regulation of cytokine levels by β‐arrestins in vivo. Taken together, these results indicate that β‐arr‐1 and ‐2 mediate LPS‐induced cytokine secretion in a cell‐type specific manner and that both β‐arrestins have overlapping but non‐redundant roles in regulating inflammatory cytokine production and endotoxic shock in mice. J. Cell. Physiol. 225: 406–416, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

β‐arrestin1 phosphorylation by GRK5 regulates G protein‐independent 5‐HT4 receptor signalling

G protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) have been found to trigger G protein‐independent signalling. However, the regulation of G protein‐independent pathways, especially their desensitization, is poorly characterized. Here, we show that the G protein‐independent 5‐HT₄ receptor (5‐HT₄R)‐operated Src/ERK (extracellular signal‐regulated kinase) pathway, but not the G_s pathway, is inhibited by GPCR kinase 5 (GRK5), physically associated with the proximal region of receptor’ C‐terminus in both human embryonic kidney (HEK)‐293 cells and colliculi neurons. This inhibition required two sequences of events: the association of β–arrestin1 to a phosphorylated serine/threonine cluster located within the receptor C‐t domain and the phosphorylation, by GRK5, of β–arrestin1 (at Ser⁴¹²) bound to the receptor. Phosphorylated β‐arrestin1 in turn prevented activation of Src constitutively bound to 5‐HT₄Rs, a necessary step in receptor‐stimulated ERK signalling. This is the first demonstration that β‐arrestin1 phosphorylation by GRK5 regulates G protein‐independent signalling.     

Adaptor Protein2 (AP2) Orchestrates CXCR2‐Mediated Cell Migration

The chemokine receptor CXCR2 is vital for inflammation, wound healing, angiogenesis, cancer progression and metastasis. Adaptor protein 2 (AP2), a clathrin binding heterotetrameric protein comprised of α, β2, μ2 and σ2 subunits, facilitates clathrin‐mediated endocytosis. Mutation of the LLKIL motif in the CXCR2 carboxyl‐terminal domain (CTD) results in loss of AP2 binding to the receptor and loss of ligand‐mediated receptor internalization and chemotaxis. AP2 knockdown also results in diminished ligand‐mediated CXCR2 internalization, polarization and chemotaxis. Using knockdown/rescue approaches with AP2‐μ2 mutants, the binding domains were characterized in reference to CXCR2 internalization and chemotaxis. When in an open conformation, μ2 Patch 1 and Patch 2 domains bind tightly to membrane PIP2 phospholipids. When AP2‐μ2, is replaced with μ2 mutated in Patch 1 and/or Patch 2 domains, ligand‐mediated receptor binding and internalization are not lost. However, chemotaxis requires AP2‐μ2 Patch 1, but not Patch 2. AP2‐σ2 has been demonstrated to bind dileucine motifs to facilitate internalization. Expression of AP2‐σ2 V88D and V98S dominant negative mutants resulted in loss of CXCR2 mediated chemotaxis. Thus, AP2 binding to both membrane phosphatidylinositol phospholipids and dileucine motifs is crucial for directional migration or chemotaxis. Moreover, AP2‐mediated receptor internalization can be dissociated from AP2‐mediated chemotaxis.      

CXCR7 mediates SDF1‐induced melanocyte migration

Melanoblasts are derived from the neural crest and migrate to the dermal/epidermal border of skin and hair bulges. Although melanoblast migration during embryogenesis has been well investigated, there are only a few reports regarding the migration of mature melanocytes. Here, we demonstrate that a chemokine, stromal‐derived factor‐1 (SDF1, also known as CXCL12), and one of its receptor CXCR7 regulate normal human epidermal melanocyte (NHEM) migration. We found that SDF1 induces the directional migration of NHEMs. Interestingly, although both CXCR4 and CXCR7 are expressed in NHEMs, blockade of CXCR4 using a CXCR4‐specific neutralizing antibody did not exert any influence on the SDF1‐induced migration of NHEMs, whereas blockade of CXCR7 using a CXCR7‐specific neutralizing antibody did influence migration. Furthermore, SDF1‐induced NHEMs migration exhibited the early hallmark events of CXCR7 signaling associated with MAP kinase activation. It is known that the phosphorylation of ERK through CXCR7 signaling is mediated by β‐arrestins. The treatment of NHEMs with SDF1 resulted in the phosphorylation of ERK in a β‐arrestin 2‐dependent manner. These results suggest that melanocytes may have a unique mechanism of migration via SDF1/CXCR7 signaling that is different from that of other cell types.     

Insights into β2‐adrenergic receptor binding from structures of the N‐terminal lobe of ARRDC3

ARRDC3 is one of six known human α‐arrestins, and has been implicated in the downregulation of the β2‐adrenergic receptor (β2AR). ARRDC3 consists of a two‐lobed arrestin fold and a C‐terminal tail containing two PPYX motifs. In the current model for receptor downregulation by ARRDC3, the arrestin fold portion is thought to bind the receptor, while the PPXY motifs recruit ubiquitin ligases of the NEDD4 family. Here we report the crystal structures of the N‐terminal lobe of human ARRDC3 in two conformations, at 1.73 and 2.8 Å resolution, respectively. The structures reveal a large electropositive region that is capable of binding phosphate ions of crystallization. Residues within the basic patch were shown to be important for binding to β2AR, similar to the situation with β‐arrestins. This highlights potential parallels in receptor recognition between α‐ and β‐arrestins.     

Interaction of profilin‐1 and F‐actin via a β‐arrestin‐1/JNK signaling pathway involved in prostaglandin E2‐induced human mesenchymal stem cells migration and proliferation

Although many previous reports have examined the function of prostaglandin E₂ (PGE₂) in the migration and proliferation of various cell types, the role of the actin cytoskeleton in human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) migration and proliferation has not been reported. The present study examined the involvement of profilin‐1 (Pfn‐1) and filamentous‐actin (F‐actin) in PGE₂‐induced hMSC migration and proliferation and its related signal pathways. PGE₂ (10^?6 M) increased both cell migration and proliferation, and also increased E‐type prostaglandin receptor 2 (EP2) mRNA expression, β‐arrestin‐1 phosphorylation, and c‐Jun N‐terminal kinase (JNK) phosphorylation. Small interfering RNA (siRNA)‐mediated knockdown of β‐arrestin‐1 and JNK (‐1, ‐2, ‐3) inhibited PGE₂‐induced growth of hMSCs. PGE₂ also activated Pfn‐1, which was blocked by JNK siRNA, and induced F‐actin level and organization. Downregulation of Pfn‐1 by siRNA decreased the level and organization of F‐actin. In addition, specific siRNA for TRIO and F‐actin‐binding protein (TRIOBP) reduced the PGE₂‐induced increase in hMSC migration and proliferation. Together, these experimental data demonstrate that PGE₂ partially stimulates hMSCs migration and proliferation by interaction of Pfn‐1 and F‐actin via EP2 receptor‐dependent β‐arrestin‐1/JNK signaling pathways. J. Cell. Physiol. 226: 559–571, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Depletion of β‐arrestin2 in hepatic stellate cells reduces cell proliferation via ERK pathway

β‐Arrestins are multifunctional adaptor proteins. Recently, some new roles of β‐arrestins in regulating intracellular signaling networks have been discovered, which regulate cell growth, proliferation, and apoptosis. Though, the role of β‐arrestins expression in the pathology of hepatic fibrosis remains unclear. In this study, the possible relationship between the expression of β‐arrestins with the experimental hepatic fibrosis and the proliferation of hepatic stellate cells (HSCs) were investigated. Porcine serum induced liver fibrosis was established in this study. At five time points, the dynamic expression of β‐arrestin1, β‐arrestin2, and α‐smooth muscle actin (α‐SMA) in rat liver tissues, was measured by immunohistochemical staining, double immunofluorescent staining, and Western blotting. This study showed that aggravation of hepatic fibrosis with gradually increasing expression of β‐arrestin2 in the hepatic tissues, but not β‐arrestin1. Further, as hepatic fibrosis worsens, β‐arrestin2‐expressing activated HSCs accounts for an increasingly larger percentage of all activated HSCs. And the expression of β‐arrestin2 had a significant positive correlation with the expression of α‐SMA, an activated HSCs marker. In vitro studies, the dynamic expression of β‐arrestin1 and β‐arrestin2 in platelet derived growth factor‐BB (PDGF‐BB) stimulated HSCs was assessed by Western blotting. The expression of β‐arrestin2 was remarkably increased in PDGF‐BB stimulated HSCs. Furthermore, the small interfering RNA (siRNA) technique was used to explore the effect of β‐arrestins on the proliferation of HSCs and the activation of ERK1/2. Transfection of siRNA targeting β‐arrestin2 mRNA (siβ‐arrestin2) into HSCs led to a 68% and 70% reduction of β‐arrestin2 mRNA and protein expression, respectively. siβ‐arrestin2 abolished the effect of PDGF‐BB on the proliferation of HSCs. In addition, siβ‐arrestin2 exerted the inhibition of the activation of ERK1/2 in HSCs. The present study provided strong evidence for the participation of the β‐arrestin2 in the pathogenesis of hepatic fibrosis. The β‐arrestin2 depletion diminishes HSCs ERK1/2 signaling and proliferation stimulated by PDGF‐BB. Selective targeting of β‐arrestin2 inhibitors to HSCs might present as a novel strategy for the treatment of hepatic fibrosis. J. Cell. Biochem. 114: 1153–1162, 2013. © 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

IL‐8 promotes cell migration through regulating EMT by activating the Wnt/β‐catenin pathway in ovarian cancer

Interleukin‐8 (IL‐8), as an inflammatory chemokine, has been previously shown to contribute to tumorigenesis in several malignancies including the ovarian cancer. However, little is known about how IL‐8 promotes the metastasis and invasion of ovarian cancers cells. In this study, we found that IL‐8 and its receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2 were up‐regulated in advanced ovarian serous cancer tissues. Furthermore, the level of IL‐8 and its receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2 expression were associated with ovarian cancer stage, grade and lymph node metastasis. In vitro, IL‐8 promoted ovarian cancer cell migration, initiated the epithelial‐mesenchymal transition (EMT) program and activated Wnt/β‐catenin signalling. However, when treated with Reparixin (inhibitor of both IL‐8 receptors CXCR1 and CXCR2), effect of both endogenous and exogenous IL‐8 was reversed. Together, our results indicated that IL‐8 triggered ovarian cancer cells migration partly through Wnt/β‐catenin pathway mediated EMT, and IL‐8 may be an important molecule in the invasion and metastasis of ovarian cancer.     

Molecular properties of gp100‐reactive T‐cell receptors drive the cytokine profile and antitumor efficacy of transgenic host T cells

To study the contribution of T‐cell receptors (TCR) to resulting T‐cell responses, we studied three different human αβ TCRs, reactive to the same gp100‐derived peptide presented in the context of HLA‐A*0201. When expressed in primary CD8 T cells, all receptors elicited classic antigen‐induced IFN‐γ responses, which correlated with TCR affinity for peptide–MHC in the order T4H2 > R6C12 > SILv44. However, SILv44 elicited superior IL‐17A release. Importantly, in vivo, SILv44‐transgenic T cells mediated superior antitumor responses to 888‐A2 + human melanoma tumor cells upon adoptive transfer into tumor‐challenged mice while maintaining IL‐17 expression. Modeling of the TCR ternary complexes suggested architectural differences between SILv44 and the other complexes, providing a potential structural basis for the observed differences. Overall, the data reveal a more prominent role for the T‐cell receptor in defining host T‐cell physiology than traditionally assumed, while parameters beyond IFN‐γ secretion and TCR affinity ultimately determine the reactivity of tumor‐reactive T cells.     

TCR‐β repertoire analysis of antigen‐specific single T cells using a high‐density microcavity array

The antigen specificity of cytotoxic T cells, provided by T‐cell receptors (TCRs), plays a central role in human autoimmune diseases, infection, and cancer. As the TCR repertoire is unique in individual cytotoxic T cells, a strategy to analyze its gene rearrangement at the single‐cell level is required. In this study, we applied a high‐density microcavity array enabling target cell screening of several thousands of single cells for identification of functional TCR‐β gene repertoires specific to melanoma (gp100) and cytomegalovirus (CMV) antigens. T cells expressing TCRs with the ability to recognize fluorescent‐labeled antigen peptide tetramers were isolated by using a micromanipulator under microscopy. Regularly arranged cells on the microcavity array eased detection and isolation of target single cells from a polyclonal T‐cell population. The isolated single cells were then directly utilized for RT‐PCR. By sequencing the amplified PCR products, antigen‐specific TCR‐β repertoires for gp100 and human cytomegalovirus antigens were successfully identified at the single‐cell level. This simple, accurate, and cost‐effective technique for single‐cell analysis has further potential as a valuable and widely applicable tool for studies on gene screening and expression analyses of various kinds of cells. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2010;106: 311–318. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A rapid fluorogenic GPCR–β‐arrestin interaction assay

Detection of protein–protein interactions involved in signal transduction in live cells and organisms has a variety of important applications. We report a fluorogenic assay for G protein‐coupled receptor (GPCR)–β‐arrestin interaction that is genetically encoded, generalizes to multiple GPCRs, and features high signal‐to‐noise because fluorescence is absent until its components interact upon GPCR activation. Fluorescence after protease‐activated receptor‐1 activation developed in minutes and required specific serine–threonine residues in the receptor carboxyl tail, consistent with a classical G protein‐coupled receptor kinase dependent β‐arrestin recruitment mechanism. This assay provides a useful complement to other in vivo assays of GPCR activation.     

Profiling two indole‐2‐carboxamides for allosteric modulation of the CB1 receptor

Allosteric modulation of G‐protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) represents a novel approach for fine‐tuning GPCR functions. The cannabinoid CB1 receptor, a GPCR associated with the CNS, has been implicated in the treatment of drug addiction, pain, and appetite disorders. We report here the synthesis and pharmacological characterization of two indole‐2‐carboxamides:5‐chloro‐3‐ethyl‐1‐methyl‐N‐(4‐(piperidin‐1‐yl)phenethyl)‐1H‐indole‐2‐carboxamide (ICAM‐a) and 5‐chloro‐3‐pentyl‐N‐(4‐(piperidin‐1‐yl)phenethyl)‐1H‐indole‐2‐carboxamide (ICAM‐b). Although both ICAM‐a and ICAM‐b enhanced CP55, 940 binding, ICAM‐b exhibited the strongest positive cooperativity thus far demonstrated for enhancing agonist binding to the CB1 receptor. Although it displayed negative modulatory effects on G‐protein coupling to CB1, ICAM‐b induced β‐arrestin‐mediated downstream activation of extracellular signal‐regulated kinase (ERK) signaling. These results indicate that this compound represents a novel class of CB1 ligands that produce biased signaling via CB1.     

Sub‐picomolar relaxin signalling by a pre‐assembled RXFP1, AKAP79, AC2, β‐arrestin 2, PDE4D3 complex

Biochemical studies suggest that G‐protein‐coupled receptors (GPCRs) achieve exquisite signalling specificity by forming selective complexes, termed signalosomes. Here, using cAMP biosensors in single cells, we uncover a pre‐assembled, constitutively active GPCR signalosome, that couples the relaxin receptor, relaxin family peptide receptor 1 (RXFP1), to cAMP following receptor stimulation with sub‐picomolar concentrations of peptide. The physiological effects of relaxin, a pleiotropic hormone with therapeutic potential in cancer metastasis and heart failure, are generally attributed to local production of the peptide, that occur in response to sub‐micromolar concentrations. The highly sensitive signalosome identified here provides a regulatory mechanism for the extremely low levels of relaxin that circulate. The signalosome includes requisite Gα_s, Gβγ and adenylyl cyclase 2 (AC2); AC2 is functionally coupled to RXFP1 through AKAP79 binding to helix 8 of the receptor; activation of AC2 is tonically opposed by protein kinase A (PKA)‐activated PDE4D3, scaffolded through a β‐arrestin 2 interaction with Ser⁷⁰⁴ of the receptor C‐terminus. This elaborate, pre‐assembled, ligand‐independent GPCR signalosome represents a new paradigm in GPCR signalling and provides a mechanism for the distal actions of low circulating levels of relaxin.