Solution structure and dynamics of human ubiquitin conjugating enzyme Ube2g2

Ube2g2 is an E2 enzyme which functions as part of the endoplasmic reticulum‐associated degradation (ERAD) pathway responsible for identification and degradation of misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum. In tandem with a cognate E3 ligase, Ube2g2 assembles K48‐linked polyubiquitin chains and then transfers them to substrate, leading ultimately to proteasomal degradation of the polyubiquitin‐tagged substrate. We report here the solution structure and backbone dynamics of Ube2g2 solved by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Although the solution structure agrees well with crystallographic structures for the E2 core, catalytically important loops (encompassing residues 95–107 and 130–135) flanking the active site cysteine are poorly defined. ¹⁵N spin relaxation and residual dipolar coupling analysis directly demonstrates that these two loops are highly dynamic in solution. These results suggest that Ube2g2 requires one or more of its protein partners, such as cognate E3, acceptor ubiquitin substrate or thiolester‐linked donor ubiquitin, to assume its catalytically relevant conformation. Within the NMR structural ensemble, interactions were observed between His94 and the highly mobile loop residues Asp98 and Asp99, supporting a possible role for His94 as a general base activated by the carboxylate side‐chains of Asp98 or Asp99. Proteins 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

The mechanism of linkage-specific ubiquitin chain elongation by a single-subunit E2

Ubiquitin chains of different topologies trigger distinct functional consequences, including protein degradation and reorganization of complexes. The assembly of most ubiquitin chains is promoted by E2s, yet how these enzymes achieve linkage specificity is poorly understood. We have discovered that the K11-specific Ube2S orients the donor ubiquitin through an essential noncovalent interaction that occurs in addition to the thioester bond at the E2 active site. The E2-donor ubiquitin complex transiently recognizes the acceptor ubiquitin, primarily through electrostatic interactions. The recognition of the acceptor ubiquitin surface around Lys11, but not around other lysines, generates a catalytically competent active site, which is composed of residues of both Ube2S and ubiquitin. Our studies suggest that monomeric E2s promote linkage-specific ubiquitin chain formation through substrate-assisted catalysis.     

E2-BRCA1 RING interactions dictate synthesis of mono- or specific polyubiquitin chain linkages

An E3 ubiquitin ligase mediates the transfer of activated ubiquitin from an E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme to its substrate lysine residues. Using a structure-based, yeast two-hybrid strategy, we discovered six previously unidentified interactions between the human heterodimeric RING E3 BRCA1-BARD1 and the human E2s UbcH6, Ube2e2, UbcM2, Ubc13, Ube2k and Ube2w. All six E2s bind directly to the BRCA1 RING motif and are active with BRCA1-BARD1 for autoubiquitination in vitro. Four of the E2s direct monoubiquitination of BRCA1. Ubc13-Mms2 and Ube2k direct the synthesis of Lys63- or Lys48-linked ubiquitin chains on BRCA1 and require an acceptor ubiquitin attached to BRCA1. Differences between the mono- and polyubiquitination activities of the BRCA1-interacting E2s correlate with their ability to bind ubiquitin noncovalently at a site distal to the active site. Thus, BRCA1 has the ability to direct the synthesis of specific polyubiquitin chain linkages, depending on the E2 bound to its RING.     

Mechanism of polyubiquitin chain recognition by the human ubiquitin conjugating enzyme Ube2g2

Ube2g2 is a human ubiquitin conjugating (E2) enzyme involved in the endoplasmic reticulum-associated degradation pathway, which is responsible for the identification and degradation of unfolded and misfolded proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum compartment. The Ube2g2-specific role is the assembly of Lys-48-linked polyubiquitin chains, which constitutes a signal for proteasomal degradation when attached to a substrate protein. NMR chemical shift perturbation and paramagnetic relaxation enhancement approaches were employed to characterize the binding interaction between Ube2g2 and ubiquitin, Lys-48-linked diubiquitin, and Lys-63-linked diubiquitin. Results demonstrate that ubiquitin binds to Ube2g2 with an affinity of 90 μM in two different orientations that are rotated by 180° in models generated by the RosettaDock modeling suite. The binding of Ube2g2 to Lys-48- and Lys-63-linked diubiquitin is primarily driven by interactions with individual ubiquitin subunits, with a clear preference for the subunit containing the free Lys-48 or Lys-63 side chain (i.e. the distal subunit). This preference is particularly striking in the case of Lys-48-linked diubiquitin, which exhibits an ～3-fold difference in affinities between the two ubiquitin subunits. This difference can be attributed to the partial steric occlusion of the subunit whose Lys-48 side chain is involved in the isopeptide linkage. As such, these results suggest that Lys-48-linked polyubiquitin chains may be designed to bind certain proteins like Ube2g2 such that the terminal ubiquitin subunit carrying the reactive Lys-48 side chain can be positioned properly for chain elongation regardless of chain length.     

Differential Ubiquitin Binding by the Acidic Loops of Ube2g1 and Ube2r1 Enzymes Distinguishes Their Lys-48-ubiquitylation Activities

The ubiquitin E2 enzymes, Ube2g1 and Ube2r1, are able to synthesize Lys-48-linked polyubiquitins without an E3 ligase but how that is accomplished has been unclear. Although both E2s contain essential acidic loops, only Ube2r1 requires an additional C-terminal extension (184–196) for efficient Lys-48-ubiquitylation activity. The presence of Tyr-102 and Tyr-104 in the Ube2g1 acidic loop enhanced both ubiquitin binding and Lys-48-ubiquitylation and distinguished Ube2g1 from the otherwise similar truncated Ube2r1^1–183 (Ube2r1C). Replacement of Gln-105–Ser-106–Gly-107 in the acidic loop of Ube2r1C (Ube2r1C^YGY) by the corresponding residues from Ube2g1 (Tyr-102–Gly-103–Tyr-104) increased Lys-48-ubiquitylation activity and ubiquitin binding. Two E2∼UB thioester mimics (oxyester and disulfide) were prepared to characterize the ubiquitin binding activity of the acidic loop. The oxyester but not the disulfide derivative was found to be a functional equivalent of the E2∼UB thioester. The ubiquitin moiety of the Ube2r1C^C93S-[¹⁵N]UB^K48R oxyester displayed two-state conformational exchange, whereas the Ube2r1C^C93S/YGY-[¹⁵N]UB^K48R oxyester showed predominantly one state. Together with NMR studies that compared UB^K48R oxyesters of the wild-type and the acidic loop mutant (Y102G/Y104G) forms of Ube2g1, in vitro ubiquitylation assays with various mutation forms of the E2s revealed how the intramolecular interaction between the acidic loop and the attached donor ubiquitin regulates Lys-48-ubiquitylation activity.     

Allosteric regulation of E2:E3 interactions promote a processive ubiquitination machine

RING finger proteins constitute the large majority of ubiquitin ligases (E3s) and function by interacting with ubiquitin‐conjugating enzymes (E2s) charged with ubiquitin. How low‐affinity RING–E2 interactions result in highly processive substrate ubiquitination is largely unknown. The RING E3, gp78, represents an excellent model to study this process. gp78 includes a high‐affinity secondary binding region for its cognate E2, Ube2g2, the G2BR. The G2BR allosterically enhances RING:Ube2g2 binding and ubiquitination. Structural analysis of the RING:Ube2g2:G2BR complex reveals that a G2BR‐induced conformational effect at the RING:Ube2g2 interface is necessary for enhanced binding of RING to Ube2g2 or Ube2g2 conjugated to Ub. This conformational effect and a key ternary interaction with conjugated ubiquitin are required for ubiquitin transfer. Moreover, RING:Ube2g2 binding induces a second allosteric effect, disrupting Ube2g2:G2BR contacts, decreasing affinity and facilitating E2 exchange. Thus, gp78 is a ubiquitination machine where multiple E2‐binding sites coordinately facilitate processive ubiquitination.     

Certain pairs of ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s) and ubiquitin-protein ligases (E3s) synthesize nondegradable forked ubiquitin chains containing all possible isopeptide linkages

It is generally assumed that a specific ubiquitin ligase (E3) links protein substrates to polyubiquitin chains containing a single type of isopeptide linkage, and that chains composed of linkages through Lys(48), but not through Lys(63), target proteins for proteasomal degradation. However, when we carried out a systematic analysis of the types of ubiquitin (Ub) chains formed by different purified E3s and Ub-conjugating enzymes (E2s), we found, using Ub mutants and mass spectrometry, that the U-box E3, CHIP, and Ring finger E3s, MuRF1 and Mdm2, with the E2, UbcH5, form a novel type of Ub chain that contains all seven possible linkages, but predominantly Lys(48), Lys(63), and Lys(11) linkages. Also, these heterogeneous chains contain forks (bifurcations), where two Ub molecules are linked to the adjacent lysines at Lys(6) + Lys(11), Lys(27) + Lys(29), or Lys(29) + Lys(33) on the preceding Ub molecule. However, the HECT domain E3s, E6AP and Nedd4, with the same E2, UbcH5, form homogeneous chains exclusively, either Lys(48) chains (E6AP) or Lys(63) chains (Nedd4). Furthermore, with other families of E2s, CHIP and MuRF1 synthesize homogeneous Ub chains on the substrates. Using the dimeric E2, UbcH13/Uev1a, they attach Lys(63) chains, but with UbcH1 (E2-25K), MuRF1 synthesizes Lys(48) chains on the substrate. We then compared the capacity of the forked heterogeneous chains and homogeneous chains to support proteasomal degradation. When troponin I was linked by MuRF1 to a Lys(48)-Ub chain or, surprisingly, to a Lys(63)-Ub chain, troponin I was degraded rapidly by pure 26S proteasomes. However, when linked to the mixed forked chains, troponin I was degraded quite poorly, and its polyUb chain, especially the forked linkages, was disassembled slowly by proteasome-associated isopeptidases. Because these Ring finger and U-box E3s with UbcH5 target proteins for degradation in vivo, but Lys(63) chains do not, cells probably contain additional factors that prevent formation of such nondegradable Ub-conjugates and that protect proteins linked to Lys(63)-Ub chains from proteasomal degradation.     

Molecular discrimination of structurally equivalent Lys 63‐linked and linear polyubiquitin chains

At least eight types of ubiquitin chain exist, and individual linkages affect distinct cellular processes. The only distinguishing feature of differently linked ubiquitin chains is their structure, as polymers of the same unit are chemically identical. Here, we have crystallized Lys 63‐linked and linear ubiquitin dimers, revealing that both adopt equivalent open conformations, forming no contacts between ubiquitin molecules and thereby differing significantly from Lys 48‐linked ubiquitin chains. We also examined the specificity of various deubiquitinases (DUBs) and ubiquitin‐binding domains (UBDs). All analysed DUBs, except CYLD, cleave linear chains less efficiently compared with other chain types, or not at all. Likewise, UBDs can show chain specificity, and are able to select distinct linkages from a ubiquitin chain mixture. We found that the UBAN (ubiquitin binding in ABIN and NEMO) motif of NEMO (NF‐κB essential modifier) binds to linear chains exclusively, whereas the NZF (Npl4 zinc finger) domain of TAB2 (TAK1 binding protein 2) is Lys 63 specific. Our results highlight remarkable specificity determinants within the ubiquitin system.     

Structural basis for specific recognition of Lys 63‐linked polyubiquitin chains by NZF domains of TAB2 and TAB3

TAB2 and TAB3 activate the Jun N‐terminal kinase and nuclear factor‐κB pathways through the specific recognition of Lys 63‐linked polyubiquitin chains by its Npl4 zinc‐finger (NZF) domain. Here we report crystal structures of the TAB2 and TAB3 NZF domains in complex with Lys 63‐linked diubiquitin at 1.18 and 1.40 Å resolutions, respectively. Both NZF domains bind to the distal ubiquitin through a conserved Thr‐Phe dipeptide that has been shown to be important for the interaction of the NZF domain of Npl4 with monoubiquitin. In contrast, a surface specific to TAB2 and TAB3 binds the proximal ubiquitin. Both the distal and proximal binding sites of the TAB2 and TAB3 NZF domains recognize the Ile 44‐centred hydrophobic patch on ubiquitin but do not interact with the Lys 63‐linked isopeptide bond. Mutagenesis experiments show that both binding sites are required to enable binding of Lys 63‐linked diubiquitin. We therefore propose a mechanism for the recognition of Lys 63‐linked polyubiquitin chains by TAB2 and TAB3 NZF domains in which diubiquitin units are specifically recognized by a single NZF domain.     

The UBA domain of conjugating enzyme Ubc1/Ube2K facilitates assembly of K48/K63‐branched ubiquitin chains

The assembly of a specific polymeric ubiquitin chain on a target protein is a key event in the regulation of numerous cellular processes. Yet, the mechanisms that govern the selective synthesis of particular polyubiquitin signals remain enigmatic. The homologous ubiquitin‐conjugating (E2) enzymes Ubc1 (budding yeast) and Ube2K (mammals) exclusively generate polyubiquitin linked through lysine 48 (K48). Uniquely among E2 enzymes, Ubc1 and Ube2K harbor a ubiquitin‐binding UBA domain with unknown function. We found that this UBA domain preferentially interacts with ubiquitin chains linked through lysine 63 (K63). Based on structural modeling, in vitro ubiquitination experiments, and NMR studies, we propose that the UBA domain aligns Ubc1 with K63‐linked polyubiquitin and facilitates the selective assembly of K48/K63‐branched ubiquitin conjugates. Genetic and proteomics experiments link the activity of the UBA domain, and hence the formation of this unusual ubiquitin chain topology, to the maintenance of cellular proteostasis.     

Assembly of different length of polyubiquitins on the catalytic cysteine of E2 enzymes without E3 ligase; a novel application of non-reduced/reduced 2-dimensional electrophoresis

In this study using non-reduced/reduced 2-dimensional electrophoresis (NR/R-2DE), we clearly demonstrated that E3-independent ubiquitination by Ube2K produced not only unanchored but also Ube2K-linked polyubiquitins through thioester and isopeptide bonds. E3-independent assembly of polyubiquitins on the catalytic cysteine of Ube2K strongly supports the possibility of ‘en bloc transfer’ for polyubiquitination. From the same analyses of E3-independent ubiquitination products by other E2s, we also found that different lengths of polyubiquitins were linked to different E2s through thioester bond; longer chains by Cdc34 like Ube2K, short chains by Ube2g2, and mono-ubiquitin by UbcH10. Our results suggest that E2s possess the different intrinsic catalytic activities for polyubiquitination.     

Lysine 63‐linked polyubiquitin chain may serve as a targeting signal for the 26S proteasome

Recruitment of substrates to the 26S proteasome usually requires covalent attachment of the Lys48‐linked polyubiquitin chain. In contrast, modifications with the Lys63‐linked polyubiquitin chain and/or monomeric ubiquitin are generally thought to function in proteasome‐independent cellular processes. Nevertheless, the ubiquitin chain‐type specificity for the proteasomal targeting is still poorly understood, especially in vivo. Using mass spectrometry, we found that Rsp5, a ubiquitin‐ligase in budding yeast, catalyzes the formation of Lys63‐linked ubiquitin chains in vitro. Interestingly, the 26S proteasome degraded well the Lys63‐linked ubiquitinated substrate in vitro. To examine whether Lys63‐linked ubiquitination serves in degradation in vivo, we investigated the ubiquitination of Mga2‐p120, a substrate of Rsp5. The polyubiquitinated p120 contained relatively high levels of Lys63‐linkages, and the Lys63‐linked chains were sufficient for the proteasome‐binding and subsequent p120‐processing. In addition, Lys63‐linked chains as well as Lys48‐linked chains were detected in the 26S proteasome‐bound polyubiquitinated proteins. These results raise the possibility that Lys63‐linked ubiquitin chain also serves as a targeting signal for the 26S proteaseome in vivo.     

Cyclization of polyubiquitin by the E2-25K ubiquitin conjugating enzyme

For most substrates of ubiquitin (Ub)-dependent degradation, recognition by the proteasome is mediated by a covalently attached signal assembled from multiple ubiquitins linked to each other via the C terminus of one Ub and the epsilon-amine of Lys(48) of another Ub. Among Ub-conjugating enzymes, E2-25K is unique in its ability to synthesize in vitro unanchored Lys(48)-linked poly-Ub chains from mono- or poly-Ub, E1, and ATP; thus, E2-25K has distinct binding sites for donor and acceptor (poly)Ub. During studies of chain assembly by E2-25K, we observed that Lys(48)-linked tri-Ub was efficiently converted to a new species that upon SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis migrated between linear di-Ub and tri-Ub. Analysis of this product by mass spectrometry and tryptic digestion showed that it was a cyclic form of tri-Ub. Cyclization of tri-Ub requires E1, E2-25K, ATP, and that the linear substrate has a free Gly(76) C terminus on the proximal end Ub and a Lys(48) side chain available on the distal end Ub. E2-25K similarly can catalyze the cyclization of longer poly-Ub chains, including tetra- and penta-Ub. Although cyclic tri-Ub resists hydrolysis by the PA700 or isopeptidase T deubiquitinating enzymes, it can be disassembled to Ub monomers by isopeptidase(s) in a red blood cell extract. Thus, if cyclic poly-Ub forms in vivo, it will not accumulate as a dead-end product.     

Crystal structures of Lys‐63‐linked tri‐ and di‐ubiquitin reveal a highly extended chain architecture

The covalent attachment of different types of poly‐ubiquitin chains signal different outcomes for the proteins so targeted. For example, a protein modified with Lys‐48‐linked poly‐ubiquitin chains is targeted for proteasomal degradation, whereas Lys‐63‐linked chains encode nondegradative signals. The structural features that enable these different types of chains to encode different signals have not yet been fully elucidated. We report here the X‐ray crystal structures of Lys‐63‐linked tri‐ and di‐ubiquitin at resolutions of 2.3 and 1.9 Å, respectively. The tri‐ and di‐ubiquitin species adopt essentially identical structures. In both instances, the ubiquitin chain assumes a highly extended conformation with a left‐handed helical twist; the helical chain contains four ubiquitin monomers per turn and has a repeat length of ～110 Å. Interestingly, Lys‐48 ubiquitin chains also adopt a left‐handed helical structure with a similar repeat length. However, the Lys‐63 architecture is much more open than that of Lys‐48 chains and exposes much more of the ubiquitin surface for potential recognition events. These new crystal structures are consistent with the results of solution studies of Lys‐63 chain conformation, and reveal the structural basis for differential recognition of Lys‐63 versus Lys‐48 chains. Proteins 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Mass spectrometry insights into a tandem ubiquitin‐binding domain hybrid engineered for the selective recognition of unanchored polyubiquitin

Unanchored polyubiquitin chains are emerging as important regulators of cellular physiology with diverse roles paralleling those of substrate‐conjugated polyubiquitin. However tools able to discriminate unanchored polyubiquitin chains of different isopeptide linkages have not been reported. We describe the design of a linker‐optimized ubiquitin‐binding domain hybrid (t‐UBD) containing two UBDs, a ZnF‐UBP domain in tandem with a linkage‐selective UBA domain, which exploits avidity effects to afford selective recognition of unanchored Lys48‐linked polyubiquitin chains. Utilizing native MS to quantitatively probe binding affinities we confirm cooperative binding of the UBDs within the synthetic protein, and desired binding specificity for Lys48‐linked ubiquitin dimers. Furthermore, MS/MS analyses indicate that the t‐UBD, when applied as an affinity enrichment reagent, can be used to favor the purification of endogenous unanchored Lys48‐linked polyubiquitin chains from mammalian cell extracts. Our study indicates that strategies for the rational design and engineering of polyubiquitin chain‐selective binding in nonbiological polymers are possible, paving the way for the generation of reagents to probe unanchored polyubiquitin chains of different linkages and more broadly the ‘ubiquitome’. All MS data have been deposited in the ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD004059 ( http://proteomecentral.proteomexchange.org/dataset/PXD004059 ).     

Two different classes of E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes are required for the mono-ubiquitination of proteins and elongation by polyubiquitin chains with a specific topology

RING (really interesting new gene) and U-box E3 ligases bridge E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes and substrates to enable the transfer of ubiquitin to a lysine residue on the substrate or to one of the seven lysine residues of ubiquitin for polyubiquitin chain elongation. Different polyubiquitin chains have different functions. Lys(48)-linked chains target proteins for proteasomal degradation, and Lys(63)-linked chains function in signal transduction, endocytosis and DNA repair. For this reason, chain topology must be tightly controlled. Using the U-box E3 ligase CHIP [C-terminus of the Hsc (heat-shock cognate) 70-interacting protein] and the RING E3 ligase TRAF6 (tumour-necrosis-factor-receptor-associated factor 6) with the E2s Ubc13 (ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme 13)-Uev1a (ubiquitin E2 variant 1a) and UbcH5a, in the present study we demonstrate that Ubc13-Uev1a supports the formation of free Lys(63)-linked polyubiquitin chains not attached to CHIP or TRAF6, whereas UbcH5a catalyses the formation of polyubiquitin chains linked to CHIP and TRAF6 that lack specificity for any lysine residue of ubiquitin. Therefore the abilities of these E2s to ubiquitinate a substrate and to elongate polyubiquitin chains of a specific topology appear to be mutually exclusive. Thus two different classes of E2 may be required to attach a polyubiquitin chain of a particular topology to a substrate: the properties of one E2 are designed to mono-ubiquitinate a substrate with no or little inherent specificity for an acceptor lysine residue, whereas the properties of the second E2 are tailored to the elongation of a polyubiquitin chain using a defined lysine residue of ubiquitin.     

Mms2-Ubc13 covalently bound to ubiquitin reveals the structural basis of linkage-specific polyubiquitin chain formation

Lys63-linked polyubiquitin chains participate in nonproteolytic signaling pathways, including regulation of DNA damage tolerance and NF-kappaB activation. E2 enzymes bound to ubiquitin E2 variants (UEV) are vital in these pathways, synthesizing Lys63-linked polyubiquitin chains, but how these complexes achieve specificity for a particular lysine linkage has been unclear. We have determined the crystal structure of an Mms2-Ubc13-ubiquitin (UEV-E2-Ub) covalent intermediate with donor ubiquitin linked to the active site residue of Ubc13. In the structure, the unexpected binding of a donor ubiquitin of one Mms2-Ubc13-Ub complex to the acceptor-binding site of Mms2-Ubc13 in an adjacent complex allows us to visualize at atomic resolution the molecular determinants of acceptor-ubiquitin binding. The structure reveals the key role of Mms2 in allowing selective insertion of Lys63 into the Ubc13 active site and suggests a molecular model for polyubiquitin chain elongation.     

S5a promotes protein degradation by blocking synthesis of nondegradable forked ubiquitin chains

Ubiquitin (Ub)–protein conjugates formed by purified ring‐finger or U‐box E3s with the E2, UbcH5, resist degradation and disassembly by 26S proteasomes. These chains contain multiple types of Ub forks in which two Ub's are linked to adjacent lysines on the proximal Ub. We tested whether cells contain factors that prevent formation of nondegradable conjugates and whether the forked chains prevent proteasomal degradation. S5a is a ubiquitin interacting motif (UIM) protein present in the cytosol and in the 26S proteasome. Addition of S5a or a GST‐fusion of S5a's UIM domains to a ubiquitination reaction containing 26S proteasomes, UbcH5, an E3 (MuRF1 or CHIP), and a protein substrate, dramatically stimulated its degradation, provided S5a was present during ubiquitination. Mass spectrometry showed that S5a and GST–UIM prevented the formation of Ub forks without affecting synthesis of standard isopeptide linkages. The forked Ub chains bind poorly to 26S proteasomes unlike those synthesized with S5a present or linked to Lys63 or Lys48 chains. Thus, S5a (and presumably certain other UIM proteins) function with certain E3/E2 pairs to ensure synthesis of efficiently degraded non‐forked Ub conjugates.     

Structural basis for specific recognition of Lys 63‐linked polyubiquitin chains by tandem UIMs of RAP80

RAP80 has a key role in the recruitment of the Abraxas–BRCC36–BRCA1–BARD1 complex to DNA‐damage foci for DNA repair through specific recognition of Lys 63‐linked polyubiquitinated proteins by its tandem ubiquitin‐interacting motifs (UIMs). Here, we report the crystal structure of the RAP80 tandem UIMs (RAP80‐UIM1‐UIM2) in complex with Lys 63‐linked di‐ubiquitin at 2.2 Å resolution. The two UIMs, UIM1 and UIM2, and the α‐helical inter‐UIM region together form a continuous 60 Å‐long α‐helix. UIM1 and UIM2 bind to the proximal and distal ubiquitin moieties, respectively. Both UIM1 and UIM2 of RAP80 recognize an Ile 44‐centered hydrophobic patch on ubiquitin but neither UIM interacts with the Lys 63‐linked isopeptide bond. Our structure suggests that the inter‐UIM region forms a 12 Å‐long α‐helix that ensures that the UIMs are arranged to enable specific binding of Lys 63‐linked di‐ubiquitin. This was confirmed by pull‐down analyses using RAP80‐UIM1‐UIM2 mutants of various length inter‐UIM regions. Further, we show that the Epsin1 tandem UIM, which has an inter‐UIM region similar to that of RAP80‐UIM1‐UIM2, also selectively binds Lys 63‐linked di‐ubiquitin.