Murine dendritic cell development: difficulties associated with subset analysis

Dendritic cells are bone marrow-derived professional antigen presenting cells that play major roles in both the induction of primary immune responses and tolerance. It has become clear that dendritic cells are a heterogeneous group of cells that vary in cell surface marker expression and function. Multiple dendritic cell subsets have now been defined in mouse lymphoid organs and peripheral tissues. A knowledge of the function and relationship between dendritic cell subsets will be essential for understanding the regulation of immune homeostasis, immune responses and tolerance. While an increasing number of dendritic cell progenitors are being identified, the pathways that connect them remain unclear. In addition, it is unclear whether the functional divisions reflect maturation status, subset specialization or functional plasticity in response to specific pathogen and environmental signals. This review summarizes the current knowledge about the function and lineage relationship of dendritic cell subsets. It also discusses some of the difficulties associated with dendritic cell subset analysis.     

Origin,precursors and differentiation of mouse dendritic cells

Functional specialization allows defined dendritic-cell (DC) subsets to induce efficient defence mechanisms against pathogens and tumour cells, and maintain T-cell tolerance by inducing the inactivation of autoreactive T cells. A crucial question, which has important implications for both our understanding of the induction and control of immunity by DCs, as well as the use of DCs for immunotherapy, is whether the functional diversity of DCs results from the existence of developmentally independent DC subpopulations, or whether DC subsets that share a common differentiation origin acquire specific functions in response to environmental signals. This review discusses recent findings on mouse DC development.     

The TNF receptor and Ig superfamily members form an integrated signaling circuit controlling dendritic cell homeostasis

Dendritic cells (DC) constitute the most potent antigen presenting cells of the immune system, playing a key role bridging innate and adaptive immune responses. Specialized DC subsets differ depending on their origin, tissue location and the influence of trophic factors, the latter remain to be fully understood. Myeloid-associated lymphotoxin-beta receptor (LTbetaR) signaling is required for the local proliferation of lymphoid tissue DC. This review focuses on the LTbetaR signaling cascade as a crucial positive trophic signal in the homeostasis of DC subsets. The noncanonical coreceptor pathway comprised of the immunoglobulin (Ig) superfamily member, B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA) and TNFR superfamily member, herpesvirus entry mediator (HVEM) counter regulates the trophic signaling by LTbetaR. Together both pathways form an integrated signaling circuit achieving homeostasis of DC subsets.     

Lysophosphatidylcholine‐mediated functional inactivation of syndecan‐4 results in decreased adhesion and motility of dendritic cells

Following antigen contact, maturation and migration of DCs into lymphatic tissues are crucial to the developing immune response or maintenance of tolerance. Lysophosphatidylcholine (LysoPC) is generated during apoptosis of cells and acts as a “find‐and‐eat‐me” signal thought to prevent autoimmunity. Moreover, LysoPC can activate PKCδ and initiates a signaling cascade that leads to phosphorylation and inactivation of syndecan‐4 (SDC4), a heparansulfate proteoglycan integrin co‐receptor. In human monocyte‐derived DCs, we recently demonstrated that SDC4 is upregulated during maturation thereby stimulating DC motility. Here, we investigate the effects of LysoPC on DC motility as well as on the involvement of PKCδ phosphorylation‐dependent regulation of DC motility by SDC4 and PKCα. Employing a static adhesion assay and videomicroscopy, we show that LysoPC inhibits adhesion of DCs to fibronectin and motility of DCs by decreasing podosome formation. Moreover, DC podosome formation and motility, which both are regulated by SDC4 and subject to control by PKCδ‐dependent phosphorylation of SDC4, were inhibited in LysoPC‐matured DCs. Thus, these DC are defective in adhesion and migration. Based on our results, we hypothesize that LysoPC released during apoptosis might delay DC migration to lymphoid organs and thus prevent autoimmunity. J. Cell. Physiol. 225: 905–914, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Lymphoid organ dendritic cells: beyond the Langerhans cells paradigm

The immune system has developed mechanisms to detect and initiate responses to a continual barrage of immunological challenges. Dendritic cells (DC), a heterogeneous population of leucocytes, play a major role as immunosurveillance agents. To accomplish this function, DC are equipped with highly efficient mechanisms to detect pathogens, to capture, process and present antigens, and to initiate T-cell responses. These mechanisms are developmentally regulated during the DC life cycle in a process termed 'maturation', which was originally defined using Langerhans cells (LC), a DC type of the epidermis. LC exist in the skin in an immature state dedicated to capturing antigens, and in the subcutaneous lymph nodes in a mature state dedicated to presenting those antigens to T cells. The phenotypic changes undergone by LC during maturation, and the correlation of these changes with tissue localization, have been generally considered a paradigm for all DC. However, studies of the multiple DC types found in the lymphoid organs of mice and humans have revealed that most DC subsets do not follow the life cycle typified by LC. In this review we discuss the limitations of the 'LC paradigm' and suggest that this model should be revised to accommodate the heterogeneity of the DC system. We also discuss the implications of the maturational status of the DC subsets contained in the lymphoid organs for their putative roles in the induction of immune responses and the maintenance of peripheral tolerance.     

Haematopoietic stem cells in spleen have distinct differentiative potential for antigen presenting cells

Dendritic cells (DC) are known to develop from macrophage dendritic progenitors (MDP) in bone marrow (BM), which give rise to conventional (c)DC and monocytes, both dominant antigen presenting cell (APC) subsets in spleen. This laboratory has however defined a distinct dendritic‐like cell subset in spleen (L‐DC), which can also be derived in long‐term cultures of spleen. In line with the restricted in vitro development of only L‐DC in these stromal cultures, we questioned whether self‐renewing HSC or progenitors exist in spleen with restricted differentiative capacity for only L‐DC. Neonatal spleen and BM were compared for their ability to reconstitute mice and to give rise to L‐DC, as well as other splenic APC. Neonatal spleen cells were transplanted into allotype‐distinct lethally irradiated hosts along with host‐type competitor BM cells, and assayed over 8 to 51 weeks for haematopoietic reconstitution of L‐DC and cDC subsets, along with other lymphoid and myeloid cells. In this study, neonatal spleen showed multilineage haematopoietic reconstitution in mouse chimeras, rather than specific or restricted ability to differentiate into L‐DC. However, the representation of individual APC subsets was found to be unequal in chimeras partially reconstituted with donor cells, such that more donor‐derived progeny were seen for L‐DC than for myeloid and cDC subsets. The ability of HSC in spleen to develop into L‐DC was indicated by a strong bias in the subset size of these cells over other splenic APC subsets. This type of evidence supports a model whereby spleen represents an important site for haematopoiesis of this distinct DC subset. The conditions under which haematopoiesis of L‐DC occurs in spleen, or the progenitors involved, will require further investigation.     

Maturation of function in dendritic cells for tolerance and immunity

The capacity of antigen presenting dendritic cells (DC) to function in both tolerance and immunity is now well documented. The function and characteristics of different DC subsets are reviewed here and their capacity to activate T cells under different conditions of maturation and activation is discussed. The immunogenic potential of exosomes produced by DC is also considered in light of evidence that the capacity of exosomes to activate T cells for tolerance or immunity appears to mirror that of the parent DC. A model is proposed whereby exosomes produced by immature DC can function to maintain peripheral tolerance, while exosomes produced by more mature DC can stimulate effector T cells.     

Shaping immune responses through the activation of dendritic cells–P2 receptors

Dendritic cells (DCs) activate and shape the adaptive immune response by capturing antigens, migrating to peripheral lymphoid organs where naïve T cells reside, expressing high levels of MHC and costimulatory molecules and secreting cytokines and chemokines. DCs are endowed with a high degree of functional plasticity and their functions are tightly regulated. Besides initiating adaptive immune responses, DCs play a key role in maintaining peripheral tolerance toward self-antigens. On the basis of the information gathered from the tissue where they reside, DCs adjust their functional activity to ensure that protective immunity is favoured while unwanted or exaggerated immune responses are prevented. A wide variety of signals from neighbouring cells affecting DC functional activity have been described. Here we will discuss the complex role of extracellular nucleotides in the regulation of DC function and the role of P2 receptors as possible tools to manipulate immune responses.     

Ligation of Notch receptors in human conventional and plasmacytoid dendritic cells differentially regulates cytokine and chemokine secretion and modulates Th cell polarization

Notch signaling is involved in multiple cellular processes. Recent data also support the prominent role of Notch signaling in the regulation of the immune response. In this study, we analyzed the expression and function of Notch receptors and ligands on both human blood conventional dendritic cells (cDCs) and plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs). The expression and modulation upon TLR activation of Notch molecules partially differed between cDCs and pDCs, but functional involvement of the Notch pathway in both cell types was clearly revealed by specific inhibition using DAPT. Beyond the induction of Notch target genes and modulation of maturation markers, Notch pathway was also involved in a differential secretion of some specific cytokines/chemokines by DC subsets. Whereas Notch ligation induced IL-10 and CCL19 secretion in cDCs, Notch inhibition resulted in a diminished production of these proteins. With regard to pDCs, Notch activation induced TNF-α whereas Notch inhibition significantly abrogated the secretion of CCL19, CXCL9, CXCL10, and TNF-α. Additionally, Notch modulation of DC subsets differentially affected Th polarization of allostimulated T cells. Our results suggest that the Notch pathway may function as an additional mechanism controlling human DC responses, with differential activity on cDCs and pDCs. This control mechanism may ultimately contribute to define the local milieu promoted by these cells under the particular conditions of the immune response.     

Macrophages: sentinels and regulators of the immune system

The important role of macrophages in host defense against a variety of pathogens has long been recognized and has been documented and reviewed in numerous publications. Recently, it has become clear that tissue macrophages are not entirely derived from monocytes, as has been assumed for a long time, but rather show an ontogenetic dichotomy in most tissues: while part of the tissue macrophages are derived from monocytes, a major subset is prenatally seeded from the yolk sac. The latter subset shows a remarkable longevity and is maintained by self‐renewal in the adult animal. This paradigm shift poses interesting questions: are these two macrophage subsets functionally equivalent cells that are recruited into the tissue at different development stages, or are both macrophage subsets discrete cell types with distinct functions, which have to exist side by side? Is the functional specialization that can be observed in most macrophages due to their lineage or due to their anatomical niche? This review will give an overview about what we know of macrophage ontogeny and will discuss the influence of the macrophage lineage and location on their functional specialization.     

Induction of CTL and nonpolarized Th cell responses by CD8alpha(+) and CD8alpha(-) dendritic cells

Two distinct dendritic cell (DC) subpopulations have been evidenced in mice on the basis of their differential CD8alpha expression and their localization in lymphoid organs. Several reports suggest that CD8alpha(+) and CD8alpha(-) DC subsets could be functionally different. In this study, using a panel of MHC class I- and/or class II-restricted peptides, we analyzed CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell responses obtained after i.v. injection of freshly purified peptide-pulsed DC subsets. First, we showed that both DC subsets efficiently induce specific CTL responses and Th1 cytokine production in the absence of CD4(+) T cell priming. Second, we showed that in vivo activation of CD4(+) T cells by CD8alpha(+) or CD8alpha(-) DC, injected i.v., leads to a nonpolarized Th response with production of both Th1 and Th2 cytokines. The CD8alpha(-) subset induced a higher production of Th2 cytokines such as IL-4 and IL-10 than the CD8alpha(+) subset. However, IL-5 was produced by CD4(+) T cells activated by both DC subsets. When both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells were primed by DC injected i.v., a similar pattern of cytokines was observed, but, under these conditions, Th1 cytokines were mainly produced by CD8(+) T cells, while Th2 cytokines were produced by CD4(+) T cells. Thus, this study clearly shows that CD4(+) T cell responses do not influence the development of specific CD8(+) T cell cytotoxic responses induced either by CD8alpha(+) or CD8alpha(-) DC subsets.     

Dendritic cell behaviour in vivo: lessons learned from intravital two-photon microscopy

Dendritic cells (DC) are central regulators of immune responses. Their functional characterization has, thus far, mainly relied on the analysis of ex vivo isolated cells or immunohistology, which provides information in a static manner. While these approaches have enabled an excellent understanding of the role of DC in antigen uptake, processing and presentation, there has been a clear need to investigate the behaviour of DC in the context of intact tissues in real time. This demand has recently been met by the availability of intravital two-photon microscopy, which allows for the visualization of single cells deep within intact organs over time. Thus, during the past few years, exciting new data have been generated as to how DC behave within secondary lymphoid and peripheral tissues both under homoeostatic and inflammatory conditions. Here, we will review what two-photon microscopy studies have taught us about the migration of DC in the interstitial space as well as their interactions with adaptive immune cells.     

Distinct functional capacities of mouse thymic and splenic dendritic cell populations

Dendritic cells (DC) are antigen-presenting cells that activate naive T cells. Murine DC are a heterogeneous population and can be subdivided into distinct subsets with different immune regulatory functions, namely the conventional DC (cDC), which include the CD8(+)Sirpalpha(-) and CD8(-)Sirpalpha(+) DC, and the plasmacytoid DC (pDC). In this study, the phenotype and function of DC subsets in both the thymus and spleen were compared. Significant differences between the thymic and splenic DC were observed in the expression of genes encoding chemokine receptors (CCRs), toll-like receptors (TLRs) and chemokines. Thymic DC expressed high levels of genes encoding a unique set of chemokines (CCL17 and CCL22) known to be important for T-cell development. Moreover, the capacity of the DC from the two organs to produce IL-6, IFN-alpha and IL-12p70 in response to the TLR 9 agonist CpG differed markedly, indicating intrinsic functional differences between subsets with similar surface phenotype. These results indicate that the microenvironment is an important factor that contributes to the functional specification of DC subsets in different lymphoid tissues.     

Dendritic cell migration and lymphocyte homing imprinting

For an effective adaptive immune response to occur, dendritic cells (DC), which are the most efficient antigen-presenting cells, must be able to sample the peripheral microenvironment and migrate towards secondary lymphoid organs (SLO) where they activate naive lymphocytes. Upon activation, lymphocytes proliferate and acquire the capacity to migrate to extralymphoid compartments. Although the molecular mechanisms controlling lymphocyte homing to lymphoid and to some extralymphoid tissues have been described in significant detail, it is much less clear how DC migration is controlled. Do DC obey similar adhesion cues that lymphocytes do, or do they have their own "zip codes"? This is relevant from a therapeutic standpoint because effective DC-based vaccines should be able to reach the appropriate tissues in order to generate protective immune responses. Here, we discuss some of the mechanisms used by DC to reach their target tissues. Once DC arrive at their destination, they are exposed to the tissue microenvironment, which likely modulates their functional properties in a tissue-specific fashion. This local DC "education" is probably responsible among other things; for the acquisition of tissue-specific homing imprinting capacity by which DC instruct lymphocytes to migrate to specific tissues. Finally, we discuss how dysregulation of these signals may play a key role in disease.     

Regulation of dendritic cell differentiation and function by estrogen receptor ligands

Estrogen receptor (ER) ligands can modulate innate and adaptive immunity and hematopoiesis, which may explain the clear sex differences in immune responses during autoimmunity, infection or trauma. Dendritic cells (DC) are antigen presenting cells important for initiation of innate and adaptive immunity, as well as immune tolerance. DC progenitors and terminally differentiated DC express ER, indicating the ER ligands may regulate DC at multiple developmental and functional stages. Although there are profound differences in innate immunity between males and females or upon systemic imposition of sex hormones, studies are just beginning to link these differences to DC. Our and others studies demonstrate that estradiol and other ER ligands regulate the homeostasis of bone marrow myeloid and lymphoid progenitors of DC, as well as DC differentiation mediated by GM-CSF and Flt3 Ligand. Since DC have a brief lifespan, these data suggest that relatively short exposures to ER ligands in vivo will alter DC numbers and intrinsic functional capacity related to their developmental state. Studies in diverse experimental models also show that agonist and antagonist ER ligands modulate DC activation and production of inflammatory mediators. These findings have implications for human health and disease since they suggest that both DC development and functional capacity will be responsive to the physiological, pharmacological and environmental ER ligands to which an individual is exposed in vivo.     

Skin-derived dendritic cells can mediate deletional tolerance of class I-restricted self-reactive T cells

Skin-draining lymph nodes contain a number of dendritic cell (DC) subsets of different origins. Some of these are migratory, such as the skin-derived epidermal Langerhans cells and a separate dermal DC subset, whereas others are lymphoid resident in nature, such as the CD8+ DCs found throughout the lymphoid tissues. In this study, we examine the DC subset presentation of skin-derived self-Ag by migratory and lymphoid-resident DCs, both in the steady state and under conditions of local skin infection. We show that presentation of self-Ag is confined to skin-derived migrating DCs in both settings. Steady state presentation resulted in deletional T cell tolerance despite these DCs expressing a relatively mature phenotype as measured by traditional markers such as the level of MHC class II and CD86 expression. Thus, self-Ag can be carried to the draining lymph nodes by skin-derived DCs and there presented by these same cells for tolerization of the circulating T cell pool.     

Regulation of mucosal dendritic cell function by receptor activator of NF-kappa B (RANK)/RANK ligand interactions: impact on tolerance induction

The mucosal immune system is uniquely equipped to discriminate between potentially invasive pathogens and innocuous food proteins. While the mechanisms responsible for induction of mucosal immunity vs tolerance are not yet fully delineated, recent studies have highlighted mucosal dendritic cells (DC) as being important in determining the fate of orally administered Ag. To further investigate the DC:T cell signals involved in regulating the homeostatic balance between mucosal immunity and tolerance, we have examined the expression and function of the TNFR family member receptor activator of NF-kappaB (RANK) and its cognate ligand, RANKL, in vitro and in vivo. Our data show that although DC isolated from mucosal lymphoid tissues expressed similar levels of surface RANK compared with DC isolated from peripheral lymphoid tissues, DC from the distinct anatomical sites displayed differential responsiveness to RANK engagement with soluble RANKL. Whereas splenic DC responded to RANKL stimulation with elevated IL-12 p40 mRNA expression, Peyer's patch DC instead preferentially displayed increased IL-10 mRNA expression. Our data also show that the in vivo functional capacity of mucosal DC can be modulated by RANKL. Treatment with RANKL in vivo at the time of oral administration of soluble OVA enhanced the induction of tolerance in two different mouse models. These studies underscore the functional differences between mucosal and peripheral DC and highlight a novel role for RANK/RANKL interactions during the induction of mucosal immune responses.     

Human dendritic cells acquire a semimature phenotype and lymph node homing potential through interaction with CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells

Interactions between dendritic cells (DC) and T cells are known to involve the delivery of signals in both directions. We sought to characterize the effects on human DC of contact with different subsets of activated CD4+ T cells. The results showed that interaction with CD25(high)CD4+ regulatory T cells (Tregs) caused DC to take on very different properties than contact with naive or memory phenotype T cells. Whereas non-Tregs stimulated DC maturation, culture with Tregs produced DC with a mixed phenotype. By many criteria, Tregs inhibited DC maturation, inducing down-regulation of costimulatory molecules and T cell stimulatory activity. However, DC exposed to Tregs also showed some changes typically associated with DC maturation, namely, increased expression of CCR7 and MHC class II molecules, and gained the ability to migrate in response to the CCR7 ligand CCL19. Both soluble factors and cell-associated molecules were shown to be involved in Treg modulation of DC, with lymphocyte activation gene 3 (LAG-3) playing a predominant role in driving maturation-associated changes. The data show that Tregs induce the generation of semimature DC with the potential to migrate into lymphoid organs, suggesting a possible mechanism by which Tregs down-modulate immune responses.