Hfq reduces envelope stress by controlling expression of envelope‐localized proteins and protein complexes in enteropathogenic Escherichia coli

Gram‐negative bacteria possess several envelope stress responses that detect and respond to damage to this critical cellular compartment. The σ^E envelope stress response senses the misfolding of outer membrane proteins (OMPs), while the Cpx two‐component system is believed to detect the misfolding of periplasmic and inner membrane proteins. Recent studies in several Gram‐negative organisms found that deletion of hfq, encoding a small RNA chaperone protein, activates the σ^E envelope stress response. In this study, we assessed the effects of deleting hfq upon activity of the σ^E and Cpx responses in non‐pathogenic and enteropathogenic (EPEC) strains of Escherichia coli. We found that the σ^E response was activated in Δhfq mutants of all E. coli strains tested, resulting from the misregulation of OMPs. The Cpx response was activated by loss of hfq in EPEC, but not in E. coli K‐12. Cpx pathway activation resulted in part from overexpression of the bundle‐forming pilus (BFP) in EPEC Δhfq. We found that Hfq repressed expression of the BFP via PerA, a master regulator of virulence in EPEC. This study shows that Hfq has a more extensive role in regulating the expression of envelope proteins and horizontally acquired virulence genes in E. coli than previously recognized.     

Signaling mechanisms for activation of extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factors

A variety of mechanisms are used to signal extracytoplasmic conditions to the cytoplasm. These mechanisms activate extracytoplasmic function (ECF) sigma factors which recruit RNA-polymerase to specific genes in order to express appropriate proteins in response to the changing environment. The two best understood ECF signaling pathways regulate σ^E-mediated expression of periplasmic stress response genes in Escherichia coli and FecI-mediated expression of iron-citrate transport genes in E. coli. Homologues from other Gram-negative bacteria suggest that these two signaling mechanisms and variations on these mechanisms may be the general schemes by which ECF sigma factors are regulated in Gram-negative bacteria.     

The σE stress response is required for stress‐induced mutation and amplification in Escherichia coli

Pathways of mutagenesis are induced in microbes under adverse conditions controlled by stress responses. Control of mutagenesis by stress responses may accelerate evolution specifically when cells are maladapted to their environments, i.e. are stressed. Stress‐induced mutagenesis in the Escherichia coli Lac assay occurs either by ‘point’ mutation or gene amplification. Point mutagenesis is associated with DNA double‐strand‐break (DSB) repair and requires DinB error‐prone DNA polymerase and the SOS DNA‐damage‐ and RpoS general‐stress responses. We report that the RpoE envelope‐protein‐stress response is also required. In a screen for mutagenesis‐defective mutants, we isolated a transposon insertion in the rpoE P2 promoter. The insertion prevents rpoE induction during stress, but leaves constitutive expression intact, and allows cell viability. rpoE insertion and suppressed null mutants display reduced point mutagenesis and maintenance of amplified DNA. Furthermore, σ^E acts independently of stress responses previously implicated: SOS/DinB and RpoS, and of σ³², which was postulated to affect mutagenesis. I‐SceI‐induced DSBs alleviated much of the rpoE phenotype, implying that σ^E promoted DSB formation. Thus, a third stress response and stress input regulate DSB‐repair‐associated stress‐induced mutagenesis. This provides the first report of mutagenesis promoted by σ^E, and implies that extracytoplasmic stressors may affect genome integrity and, potentially, the ability to evolve.     

Induction of the Cpx Envelope Stress Pathway Contributes to Escherichia coli Tolerance to Antimicrobial Peptides

Antimicrobial peptides produced by multicellular organisms as part of their innate system of defense against microorganisms are currently considered potential alternatives to conventional antibiotics in case of infection by multiresistant bacteria. However, while the mode of action of antimicrobial peptides is relatively well described, resistance mechanisms potentially induced or selected by these peptides are still poorly understood. In this work, we studied the mechanisms of action and resistance potentially induced by ApoEdpL-W, a new antimicrobial peptide derived from human apolipoprotein E. Investigation of the genetic response of Escherichia coli upon exposure to sublethal concentrations of ApoEdpL-W revealed that this antimicrobial peptide triggers activation of RcsCDB, CpxAR, and σ^E envelope stress pathways. This genetic response is not restricted to ApoEdpL-W, since several other antimicrobial peptides, including polymyxin B, melittin, LL-37, and modified S₄ dermaseptin, also activate several E. coli envelope stress pathways. Finally, we demonstrate that induction of the CpxAR two-component system directly contributes to E. coli tolerance toward ApoEdpL-W, polymyxin B, and melittin. These results therefore show that E. coli senses and responds to different antimicrobial peptides by activation of the CpxAR pathway. While this study further extends the understanding of the array of peptide-induced stress signaling systems, it also provides insight into the contribution of Cpx envelope stress pathway to E. coli tolerance to antimicrobial peptides.     

Involvement and necessity of the Cpx regulon in the event of aberrant β‐barrel outer membrane protein assembly

The Cpx and σ^E regulons help maintain outer membrane integrity; the Cpx pathway monitors the biogenesis of cell surface structures, such as pili, while the σ^E pathway monitors the biogenesis of β‐barrel outer membrane proteins (OMPs). In this study we revealed the importance of the Cpx regulon in the event of β‐barrel OMP mis‐assembly, by utilizing mutants expressing either a defective β‐barrel OMP assembly machinery (Bam) or assembly defective β‐barrel OMPs. Analysis of specific mRNAs showed that ΔcpxR bam double mutants failed to induce degP expression beyond the wild type level, despite activation of the σ^E pathway. The synthetic conditional lethal phenotype of ΔcpxR in mutant Bam or β‐barrel OMP backgrounds was reversed by wild type DegP expressed from a heterologous plasmid promoter. Consistent with the involvement of the Cpx regulon in the event of aberrant β‐barrel OMP assembly, the expression of cpxP, the archetypal member of the cpx regulon, was upregulated in defective Bam backgrounds or in cells expressing a single assembly‐defective β‐barrel OMP species. Together, these results showed that both the Cpx and σ^E regulons are required to reduce envelope stress caused by aberrant β‐barrel OMP assembly, with the Cpx regulon principally contributing by controlling degP expression.     

PDZ domains of RseP are not essential for sequential cleavage of RseA or stress‐induced σE activation in vivo

The Escherichia coli σ^E extracytoplasmic stress response monitors and responds to folding stress in the cell envelope. A protease cascade directed at RseA, a membrane‐spanning anti‐σ that inhibits σ^E activity, controls this critical signal‐transduction system. Stress cues activate DegS to cleave RseA; a second cleavage by RseP releases RseA from the membrane, enabling its rapid degradation. Stress control of proteolysis requires that RseP cleavage is dependent on DegS cleavage. Recent in vitro and structural studies found that RseP cleavage requires binding of RseP PDZ‐C to the newly exposed C‐terminal residue (Val148) of RseA, generated by DegS cleavage, explaining dependence. We tested this mechanism in vivo. Neither mutation in the putative PDZ ligand‐binding regions nor even deletion of entire RseP PDZ domains had significant effects on RseA cleavage in vivo, and the C‐terminal residue of DegS‐processed RseA also little affected RseA cleavage. Indeed, strains with a chromosomal rseP gene deleted for either PDZ domain and strains with a chromosomal rseA V148 mutation grew normally and exhibited almost normal σ^E activation in response to stress signals. We conclude that recognition of the cleaved amino acid by the RseP PDZ domain is not essential for sequential cleavage of RseA and σ^E stress response in vivo.     

Adenylate cyclase mutations rescue the degP temperature-sensitive phenotype and induce the sigma E and Cpx extracytoplasmic stress regulons in Escherichia coli

Inactivation of the gene encoding the periplasmic protease DegP confers a high-temperature-sensitive phenotype in Escherichia coli. We have previously demonstrated that a degP mutant of E. coli strain CBM (W3110 pldA1) is not temperature sensitive and showed that this was most likely due to constitutive activation of the sigma E and Cpx extracytoplasmic stress regulons in the parent strain. In this study, further characterization of this strain revealed a previously unknown cryptic mutation that rescued the degP temperature-sensitive phenotype by inducing the extracytoplasmic stress regulons. We identified the cryptic mutation as an 11-bp deletion of nucleotides 1884 to 1894 of the adenylate cyclase-encoding cyaA gene (cyaAΔ11). The mechanism in which cyaAΔ11 induces the sigma E and Cpx regulons involves decreased activity of the mutant adenylate cyclase. Addition of exogenous cyclic AMP (cAMP) to the growth medium of a cyaAΔ11 mutant strain that contains a Cpx- and sigma E-inducible degP-lacZ reporter fusion decreased β-galactosidase expression to levels observed in a cyaA⁺ strain. We also found that a cyaA null mutant displayed even higher levels of extracytoplasmic stress regulon activation compared to a cyaAΔ11 mutant. Thus, we conclude that the lowered concentration of cAMP in cyaA mutants induces both sigma E and Cpx extracytoplasmic stress regulons and thereby rescues the degP temperature-sensitive phenotype.     

A third envelope stress signal transduction pathway in Escherichia coli

Escherichia coli uses overlapping envelope stress responses to adapt to insults to the bacterial envelope that cause protein misfolding. The sigmaE and Cpx envelope stress responses are activated by both common and distinct envelope stresses and respond by increasing the expression of the periplasmic protease DegP as well as target genes unique to each response. The sigmaE pathway is involved in outer membrane protein (OMP) folding quality control whereas the Cpx pathway plays an important role in the assembly of at least one pilus. Previously, we identified the spy gene as a new Cpx regulon member of unknown function. Interestingly, induction of spy expression by severe envelope stresses such as spheroplasting is only partially dependent on an intact Cpx signalling pathway, unlike other Cpx-regulated genes. Here we show that the BaeS sensor kinase and BaeR response regulator also control expression of spy in response to envelope stress. BaeS and BaeR do not affect expression of other known Cpx-regulated genes, however, baeR cpxR double mutants show increased sensitivity to envelope stresses relative to either single mutant alone. We propose that the Bae signal transduction pathway controls a third envelope stress response in E. coli that induces expression of a distinct set of adaptive genes.     

Identification of inducers of the Yersinia enterocolitica phage shock protein system and comparison to the regulation of the RpoE and Cpx extracytoplasmic stress responses

Known inducers of the phage shock protein (Psp) system suggest that it is an extracytoplasmic stress response, as are the well-studied RpoE and Cpx systems. However, a random approach to identify conditions and proteins that induce the Psp system has not been attempted. It is also unknown whether the proteins or mutations that induce Psp are specific or if they also activate the RpoE and Cpx systems. This study addressed these issues for the Yersinia enterocolitica Psp system. Random transposon mutagenesis identified null mutations and overexpression mutations that increase Phi(pspA-lacZ) operon fusion expression. The results suggest that Psp may respond exclusively to extracytoplasmic stress. Null mutations affected glucosamine-6-phosphate synthetase (glmS), which plays a role in cell envelope biosynthesis, and the F0F1 ATPase (atp operon). The screen also revealed that in addition to several secretins, the overexpression of three novel putative inner membrane proteins (IMPs) induced the Psp response. We also compared induction of the Y. enterocolitica Psp, RpoE, and Cpx responses. Overexpression of secretins or the three IMPs or the presence of an atpB null mutation only induced the Psp response. Similarly, known inducers of the RpoE and Cpx responses did not significantly induce the Psp response. Only the glmS null mutation induced all three responses. Therefore, Psp is induced distinctly from the RpoE and Cpx systems. The specific IMP inducers may be valuable tools to probe specific signal transduction events of the Psp response in future studies.