Induction of genotoxic and cytotoxic damage by aclarubicin, a dual topoisomerase inhibitor

The anthracycline aclarubicin (ACLA) is an intercalative antibiotic and antineoplastic agent that efficiently binds to DNA, leading to a secondary inhibition of the catalytic activity of topoisomerase II (topo II) on DNA. Besides this activity, ACLA has been reported to exert a concomitant poisoning effect on topo I, in a fashion similar to that of the antitumor drug camptothecin and its derivatives. As a consequence of this dual (topo II catalytic inhibiting/topo I poisoning) activity of ACLA, the picture is somewhat confusing with regards to DNA damage and cytotoxicity. We studied the capacity of ACLA to induce catalytic inhibition of topo II as well as cytotoxic effects and DNA damage in cultured Chinese hamster V79 cells and their radiosensitive counterparts irs-2. The ultimate purpose was to find out whether differences could be observed between the two cell lines in their response to ACLA, as has been widely reported for radiosensitive cells treated with topo poisons. Our results seem to agree with the view that the radiosensitive irs-2 cells appear as hypersensitive ACLA as compared with radiation repair-proficient V79 cells. The recovery after ACLA treatment was also followed-up, and the irs-2 mutant was found to be less proficient than V79 to repair DNA strand breaks induced by ACLA.     

Hypersensitivity of nonhomologous DNA end-joining mutants to VP-16 and ICRF-193: implications for the repair of topoisomerase II-mediated DNA damage

A number of clinically useful anticancer drugs, including etoposide (VP-16), target DNA topoisomerase (topo) II. These drugs, referred to as topo II poisons, stabilize cleavable complexes, thereby generating DNA double-strand breaks. Bis-2,6-dioxopiperazines such as ICRF-193 also inhibit topo II by inducing a distinct type of DNA damage, termed topo II clamps, which has been believed to be devoid of double-strand breaks. Despite the biological and clinical importance, the molecular mechanisms for the repair of topo II-mediated DNA damage remain largely unknown. Here, we perform genetic analyses using the chicken DT40 cell line to investigate how DNA lesions caused by topo II inhibitors are repaired. Notably, we show that LIG4-/- and KU70-/- cells, which are defective in nonhomologous DNA end-joining (NHEJ), are extremely sensitive to both VP-16 and ICRF-193. In contrast, RAD54-/- cells (defective in homologous recombination) are much less hypersensitive to VP-16 than the NHEJ mutants and, more importantly, are not hypersensitive to ICRF-193. Our results provide the first evidence that NHEJ is the predominant pathway for the repair of topo II-mediated DNA damage; that is, cleavable complexes and topo II clamps. The outstandingly increased cytotoxicity of topo II inhibitors in the absence of NHEJ suggests that simultaneous inhibition of topo II and NHEJ would provide a powerful protocol in cancer chemotherapy involving topo II inhibitors.     

Overproduction of topoisomerase II in an ataxia telangiectasia fibroblast cell line: comparison with a topoisomerase II-overproducing hamster cell mutant.

Ataxia telangiectasia (AT) cell lines are characterised by their hypersensitivity to ionizing radiation and bleomycin, and their failure to inhibit DNA synthesis after DNA damage. A recent report [Singh et al. (1988) Nucl. Acids Res. 16, 3919-3929] indicated that a reduction in topoisomerase II (topo II) activity was a feature of AT lymphoblast cell lines. We have studied the possible role of DNA topoisomerases in determining the phenotype of an AT fibroblast cell line. AT5BIVA cells are sensitive to the topo II inhibitors etoposide (VP16) and amsacrine (m-AMSA), compared to normal human fibroblasts (MRC5-V1 and VA13). AT5BIVA cells express a 3-fold higher level of topo II protein than MRC5-V1 cells, and 6-fold higher than VA13. This is reflected in elevated topo II activity in AT5BIVA cells. Untransformed AT5BI cells also show elevated topo II activity compared to untransformed normal cells. The extent of overproduction of topo II in AT5BIVA cells is comparable with that seen in a mutant Chinese hamster cell line, ADR-1, which is similarly hypersensitive to both bleomycin and topo II inhibitors. However, ADR-1 cells show neither hypersensitivity to ionizing radiation nor abnormal inhibition of DNA synthesis following DNA damage. Topo II overproduction per se does not appear sufficient to generate an "AT-like" phenotype. AT5BIVA cells express a reduced level of topoisomerase I (topo I) and are hypersensitive to the topo I inhibitor, camptothecin. ADR-1 cells express a normal level of topo I, indicating that a reduction in the level of topo I is not the inevitable consequence of an elevation in topo II.     

A comparative study of genotoxic effects of anti-topoisomerase II drugs ICRF-193 and bufalin in Chinese hamster ovary cells

With the ultimate purpose of testing the existence of possible differences in the effectiveness of the topoisomerase II catalytic inhibitor ICRF-193 (a bisdioxopiperazine) and the enzyme suppressor bufalin (a bufadienolide from toad venom) we have carried out a series of experiments aimed at inducing cytotoxicity as well as DNA and chromosome damage in transformed CHO cells. In order to assess any possible influence of DNA repair capacity of the treated cells on the final outcome, we have made use of the repair-defective CHO mutant EM9, which shows a defect in DNA single- and double-strand breaks repair for comparison with its repair-proficient parental line AA8.Our results seem to indicate that, while both ICRF-193 and bufalin suppress cell growth and result in a clear inhibition of topoisomerase II catalytic activity, only ICRF-193 has been shown as able to induce both chromosome and DNA damage, with a more pronounced effect in the CHO mutant EM9 than in the repair-proficient line AA8.     

Sequence-specific potentiation of topoisomerase II inhibitors by the histone deacetylase inhibitor suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid

Acetylation of histones leads to conformational changes of DNA. We have previously shown that the histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA), induced cell cycle arrest, differentiation, and apoptosis. In addition to their antitumor effects as single agents, HDAC inhibitors may cause conformational changes in the chromatin, rendering the DNA more vulnerable to DNA damaging agents. We examined the effects of SAHA on cell death induced by topo II inhibitors in breast cancer cell lines. Topo II inhibitors stabilize the topo II-DNA complex, resulting in DNA damage. Treatment of cells with SAHA promoted chromatin decondensation associated with increased nuclear concentration and DNA binding of the topo II inhibitor and subsequent potentiation of DNA damage. While SAHA-induced histone hyperacetylation occurred as early as 4 h, chromatin decondensation was most profound at 48 h. SAHA-induced potentiation of topo II inhibitors was sequence-specific. Pre-exposure of cells to SAHA for 48 h was synergistic, whereas shorter pre-exposure periods abrogated synergy and exposure of cells to SAHA after the topo II inhibitor resulted in antagonistic effects. Synergy was not observed in cells with depleted topo II levels. These effects were not limited to specific types of topo II inhibitors. We propose that SAHA significantly potentiates the DNA damage induced by topo II inhibitors; however, synergy is dependent on the sequence of drug administration and the expression of the target. These findings may impact the clinical development of combining HDAC inhibitors with DNA damaging agents.     

Topoisomerase II is nonfunctional in polyamine-depleted cells.

The polyamines-putrescine, spermidine, and spermine-are essential for normal cell proliferation. Polyamine depletion affects DNA structure and synthesis. Topoisomerase II (topo II) is also necessary for normal cell proliferation, and it has been shown in vitro that polyamines may affect topo II activity. In order to investigate the effect of polyamine depletion on topo II activity, we treated Chinese hamster ovary cells with either alpha-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO) or 4-amidinoindan-1-one-2'-amidinohydrazone (CGP 48664), which are polyamine biosynthesis inhibitors. Treatment with the topo II inhibitor etoposide results in DNA strand breaks only if there is active topo II in the cells. By quantitating DNA strand breaks after etoposide treatment using single cell gel electrophoresis, we were able to estimate intracellular topo II activity. We also quantitated topo II activity in crude nuclear extracts from control and polyamine biosynthesis inhibitor-treated cells. Using single cell gel electrophoresis, we noted a clear decrease in the function of topo II in polyamine biosynthesis inhibitor-treated cells, as compared with untreated control cells. However, the topo II activity in crude nuclear extracts did not differ significantly in control versus polyamine biosynthesis inhibitor-treated cells. Taken together, these results indicate that although the function of topo II in polyamine-depleted cells was impaired, topo II remained functional in an in vitro assay. Using the single cell gel electrophoresis assay, we also found that spermine depletion itself caused DNA strand breaks.     

Modulation of radiation response by inhibiting topoisomerase II catalytic activity

Due to the essential role played by DNA topoisomerases (topos) in cell survival, the use of topoisomerase inhibitors as chemotherapeutic drugs in combination with radiation has become a common strategy for the treatment of cancer. Catalytic inhibitors of these enzymes would be promising to improve the effectiveness of radiation and therefore, it appears reasonable to incorporate them in combined modality trials. In this work, we have investigated the capacity of both ICRF-193 and Aclarubicin (ACLA), two catalytic inhibitors of topoisomerase II (Topo II), to modulate radiation response in Chinese hamster V79 cell line and its radiosensitive mutant irs2. We also have explored potential mechanisms underlying these interactions. Experiments were performed in the presence and absence of either ICRF-193 or ACLA, and topo II activity was measured using an assay based upon decatenation of kinetoplast DNA (kDNA). For the combined experiments cells were incubated for 3 h in the presence of various inhibitor concentrations and irradiated 30 min prior to the end of treatments and cell survival was determined by clonogenic assay. DNA-damaging activity was measured by single-cell gel electrophoresis. Our results demonstrate that combinations of catalytic inhibitors of topo II and radiation produce an increase in cell killing induced by ionising radiation. The mechanism of radiation enhancement may involve a direct or indirect participation of topo II in the repair of radiation-induced DNA damage.     

Down modulation of topoisomerase I affects DNA repair efficiency

Topoisomerase I (topo I) relaxes supercoiled DNA through a breakage/rejoining reaction which involves a transient covalent bond between topo I and the 3' end of the cleaved DNA strand. Topo I activity is now shown to be involved in DNA damage/repair pathway in vivo. Down regulating topo I levels using anti-sense RNA approach inhibits repair of UV-induced DNA lesions, negatively affects clonogenic survival following UV-irradiation, and reduces the formation of repair patches at the cytological level. Finally, topo I is actively recruited onto genomic DNA following DNA damage by UV light without inducing ubiquitin-dependent degradation of topo I. Thus, topo I activity is important, possibly required, for pre- or post-DNA damage processing in nucleotide excision repair (NER).     

Repair of idarubicin-induced DNA damage: A cause of resistance?

Idarubicin, a widely used anticancer drug inhibits topoisomerase (topo) IIalpha and induces DNA double strand breaks. The finding that idarubicin-induced DNA damage is repaired before cell death is initiated encouraged us to examine the role of DNA repair for the cytotoxicity of idarubicin in human promyelocytic HL60 leukaemia cells. We found that DNA double strand breaks induced by a 90 min transient exposure to 0.5 microgml(-1) idarubicin were rapidly repaired throughout the whole population, while topo IIalpha itself was degraded. In spite of DNA repair, the vast majority of cells died within 40 h. Using differential staining of the chromatids and microscopic evaluation of DNA break points, we found evidence for a high number of false ligations of loose DNA strands arising from the inhibition of topo IIalpha action by idarubicin. If mainly actively transcribed genes are affected, this results in a disruption of vital genetic information, of regulatory sequences and, ultimately, in induction of the cell death pathway. Our results confirm the hypothesis that misrepair of DNA damage is a decisive event in idarubicin-induced cell death. They are discussed in the context of topo IIalpha-function and the currently known mechanisms of DNA double strand break repair.     

Putative identification of functional interactions between DNA intercalating agents and topoisomerase II using the V79 in vitro micronucleus assay

Clastogenicity is frequently observed following treatment of mammalian cells with new chemical entities. This clastogenicity, unless proven otherwise, is assumed to result from the imperfect repair of DNA lesions produced from covalent chemical/DNA interaction. However, clastogenicity can also arise via other mechanisms such as non-covalent chemical intercalation into DNA resulting in poisoning of cellular DNA topoisomerase II (topo II) and stabilization of DNA double strand breaks. We have recently reported modifications to the V79 in vitro micronucleus assay which allow an indirect evaluation of both the intercalative and topoisomerase-interactive activities of chemical agents. In the present studies we have used these modified assays to further assess the validity of this approach in an evaluation of a number of intercalating and non-intercalating polycyclic compounds. It is shown that intercalating agents may be catalytic topo II inhibitors (e.g. chloroquine (CHL), tacrine (TAC), 9-aminoacridine (9AA), ethidium bromide (EB)) or topo II poisons (e.g. proflavine (PROF), auramine O (AUR) and curcumin (CURC)). Still other intercalators are shown to lack detectable topo II-interactions, (e.g. imipramine (IMP), quinacrine (QUIN), 2-aminoanthracene (AA), iminostilbene (IMN) and promethazine (PHE)). It is concluded that (1) the clastogenicity of three agents, PROF (a typical DNA intercalating agent), and AUR and CURC (both structurally atypical intercalating agents, with unknown clastogenic mechanisms), may be due to topo II poisoning; (2) other intercalating agents may either act as catalytic topo II inhibitors or exhibit no functional topo II interaction; (3) The use of these cell-based approaches may provide a logical first step in determining if unexpected clastogenicity associated with test article exposure is due to a topo II interaction.     

ERK1/2 Signaling Plays an Important Role in Topoisomerase II Poison-Induced G2/M Checkpoint Activation

Topo II poisons, which target topoisomerase II (topo II) to generate enzyme mediated DNA damage, have been commonly used for anti-cancer treatment. While clinical evidence demonstrate a capability of topo II poisons in inducing apoptosis in cancer cells, accumulating evidence also show that topo II poison treatment frequently results in cell cycle arrest in cancer cells, which was associated with subsequent resistance to these treatments. Results in this report indicate that treatment of MCF-7 and T47D breast cancer cells with topo II poisons resulted in an increased phosphorylation of extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1 and 2 (ERK1/2) and an subsequent induction of G2/M cell cycle arrest. Furthermore, inhibition of ERK1/2 activation using specific inhibitors markedly attenuated the topo II poison-induced G2/M arrest and diminished the topo II poison-induced activation of ATR and Chk1 kinases. Moreover, decreased expression of ATR by specific shRNA diminished topo II poison-induced G2/M arrest but had no effect on topo II poison-induced ERK1/2 activation. In contrast, inhibition of ERK1/2 signaling had little, if any, effect on topo II poison-induced ATM activation. In addition, ATM inhibition by either incubation of cells with ATM specific inhibitor or transfection of cells with ATM specific siRNA did not block topo II poison-induced G2/M arrest. Ultimately, inhibition of ERK1/2 signaling greatly enhanced topo II poison-induced apoptosis. These results implicate a critical role for ERK1/2 signaling in the activation of G2/M checkpoint response following topo II poison treatment, which protects cells from topo II poison-induced apoptosis.     

Rac1 Protein Signaling Is Required for DNA Damage Response Stimulated by Topoisomerase II Poisons

To investigate the potency of the topoisomerase II (topo II) poisons doxorubicin and etoposide to stimulate the DNA damage response (DDR), S139 phosphorylation of histone H2AX (γH2AX) was analyzed using rat cardiomyoblast cells (H9c2). Etoposide caused a dose-dependent increase in the γH2AX level as shown by Western blotting. By contrast, the doxorubicin response was bell-shaped with high doses failing to increase H2AX phosphorylation. Identical results were obtained by immunohistochemical analysis of γH2AX focus formation, comet assay-based DNA strand break analysis, and measuring the formation of the topo II-DNA cleavable complex. At low dose, doxorubicin activated ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) but not ATM and Rad3-related (ATR). Both the lipid-lowering drug lovastatin and the Rac1-specific inhibitor NSC23766 attenuated doxorubicin- and etoposide-stimulated H2AX phosphorylation, induction of DNA strand breaks, and topo II-DNA complex formation. Lovastatin and NSC23766 acted in an additive manner. They did not attenuate doxorubicin-induced increase in p-ATM and p-Chk2 levels. DDR stimulated by topo II poisons was partially blocked by inhibition of type I p21-associated kinases. DDR evoked by the topoisomerase I poison topotecan remained unaffected by lovastatin. The data show that the mechanisms involved in DDR stimulated by topo II poisons are agent-specific with anthracyclines lacking DDR-stimulating activity at high doses. Pharmacological inhibition of Rac1 signaling counteracts doxorubicin- and etoposide-stimulated DDR by disabling the formation of the topo II-DNA cleavable complex. Based on the data we suggest that Rac1-regulated mechanisms are required for DNA damage induction and subsequent activation of the DDR following treatment with topo II but not topo I poisons.     

Transient dsDNA breaks during pre-replication complex assembly

Initiation of DNA replication involves the ordered assembly of the multi-protein pre-replicative complex (pre-RC) during G₁ phase. Previously, DNA topoisomerase II (topo II) was shown to associate with the DNA replication origin located in the lamin B2 gene locus in a cell-cycle-modulated manner. Here we report that activation of both the early-firing lamin B2 and the late-firing hOrs8 human replication origins involves DNA topo II-dependent, transient, site-specific dsDNA-break formation. Topo IIβ in complex with the DNA repair protein Ku associates in vivo and in vitro with the pre-RC region, introducing dsDNA breaks in a biphasic manner, during early and mid-G₁ phase. Inhibition of topo II activity interferes with the pre-RC assembly resulting in prolonged G₁ phase. The data mechanistically link DNA topo IIβ-dependent dsDNA breaks and the components of the DNA repair machinery with the initiation of DNA replication and suggest an important role for DNA topology in origin activation.     

Altered DNA topoisomerase II in multidrug resistance

The characteristic feature of multidrug resistance (MDR) associated with drugs that interact with DNA topoisomerase II (topo II) is alterations in topo II activity or amount (at-MDR). We have characterized the at-MDR phenotype in human leukemic CEM cells selected for resistance to the topo II inhibitor, VM-26. Compared to drug-sensitive cells, the key findings are that at-MDR cells exhibit (i) decreased topo II activity; (ii) decreased drug sensitivity, activity and amount of nuclear matrix topo II; (iii) increased ATP requirement of topo II; (iv) a single base mutation in topo II resulting in a change of Arg to Gln at position 449, at the start of the motif B/nucleotide binding site; and (v) decreased topo II phosphorylation, suggesting decreased kinase or increased phosphatase activities. Recent results using single-stranded conformational polymorphism analysis reveals the presence of a mutation in the motif B/nucleotide binding site of the topo II gene in CEM at-MDR cells and in another leukemic cell line selected for resistance to m-AMSA. Finally, we have observed marked changes in the nuclear distribution of topo II in cells treated with anti-topo II drugs and have also found these changes to be attenuated in drug-resistant cells. We postulate that traditional inhibitors of topo II alter the equilibrium of the strand-passing reaction such that the number of enzyme-DNA covalent complexes increases. We further suggest that when the enzyme is bound to DNA it is protected from proteolysis, thus allowing more topo II molecules to be detected. We propose that MDR associated with alterations in topo II may have clinical consequences, and our current efforts involve exploiting these biochemical and molecular observations in the development of probes that may be useful to identify such drug resistant cells in the tumors of patients.     

Differential cell cycle-specificity for chromosomal damage induced by merbarone and etoposide in V79 cells

Merbarone, a topoisomerase II (topo II) inhibitor which, in contrast to etoposide, does not stabilize topo II-DNA cleavable complexes, was previously shown to be a potent clastogen in vitro and in vivo. To investigate the possible mechanisms, we compared the cell cycle-specificity of the clastogenic effects of merbarone and etoposide in V79 cells. Using flow cytometry and BrdU labeling techniques, etoposide was shown to cause a rapid and persistent G2 delay while merbarone was shown to cause a prolonged S-phase followed by a G2 delay. To identify the stages which are susceptible to DNA damage, we performed the micronucleus (MN) assay with synchronized cells or utilized a combination of BrdU pulse labeling and the cytokinesis-blocked MN assay with non-synchronized cells. Treatment of M phase cells with either agent did not result in increased MN formation. Etoposide but not merbarone caused a significant increase in MN when cells were treated during G2 phase. When treated during S-phase, both chemicals induced highly significant increases in MN. However, the relative proportion of MN induced by merbarone was substantially higher than that induced by etoposide. Both chemicals also caused significant increases in MN in cells that were treated during G1 phase. To confirm the observations in the MN assay, first division metaphases were evaluated in the chromosome aberration assay. The chromosomes of cells treated with merbarone and etoposide showed increased frequencies of both chromatid- and chromosome-type of aberrations. Our findings indicate that while etoposide causes DNA damage more evenly throughout the G1, S and G2 phases of the cell cycle, an outcome which may be closely associated with topo II-mediated DNA strand cleavage, merbarone induces DNA breakage primarily during S-phase, an effect which is likely due to the stalling of replication forks by inhibition of topo II activity.     

Isolation and characterization of a human cDNA clone encoding a novel DNA topoisomerase II homologue from HeLa cells

We have isolated and sequenced 3 human DNA topoisomerase II (topo II) partial cDNA clones from a HeLa carcinoma cell cDNA library. Two clones were identical to an internal fragment of HeLa topo II cDNA. The third clone, CAA5, had a different and novel sequence which shared significant nucleotide (62%) and predicted peptide (70%) homologies with a region of the HeLa topo II cDNA. Our results suggest that HeLa cells express at least two homologous forms of DNA topoisomerase II. The new HeLa topo II homologue is discussed in relation to topo II isoenzymes recently described in a Burkitt lymphoma and other cell lines.     

WRN protects against topo I but not topo II inhibitors by preventing DNA break formation

The Werner syndrome helicase/3′-exonuclease (WRN) is a major component of the DNA repair and replication machinery. To analyze whether WRN is involved in the repair of topoisomerase-induced DNA damage we utilized U2-OS cells, in which WRN is stably down-regulated (wrn-kd), and the corresponding wild-type cells (wrn-wt). We show that cells not expressing WRN are hypersensitive to the toxic effect of the topoisomerase I inhibitor topotecan, but not to the topoisomerase II inhibitor etoposide. This was shown by mass survival assays, colony formation and induction of apoptosis. Upon topotecan treatment WRN deficient cells showed enhanced DNA replication inhibition and S-phase arrest, whereas after treatment with etoposide they showed the same cell cycle response as the wild-type. A considerable difference between WRN and wild-type cells was observed for DNA single- and double-strand break formation in response to topotecan. Topotecan induced DNA single-strand breaks 6 h after treatment. In both wrn-wt and wrn-kd cells these breaks were repaired at similar kinetics. However, in wrn-kd but not wrn-wt cells they were converted into DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) at high frequency, as shown by neutral comet assay and phosphorylation of H2AX. Our data provide evidence that WRN is involved in the repair of topoisomerase I, but not topoisomerase II-induced DNA damage, most likely via preventing the conversion of DNA single-strand breaks into DSBs during the resolution of stalled replication forks at topo I–DNA complexes. We suggest that the WRN status of tumor cells impacts anticancer therapy with topoisomerase I, but not topoisomerase II inhibitors.     

Distinct mechanisms of DNA damage in apoptosis induced by quercetin and luteolin

Quercetin has been reported to have carcinogenic effects. However, both quercetin and luteolin have anti-cancer activity. To clarify the mechanism underlying the carcinogenic effects of quercetin, we compared DNA damage occurring during apoptosis induced by quercetin with that occuring during apoptosis induced by luteolin. Both quercetin and luteolin similarly induced DNA cleavage with subsequent DNA ladder formation, characteristics of apoptosis, in HL-60 cells. In HP 100 cells, an H₂O₂-resistant clone of HL-60 cells, the extent of DNA cleavage and DNA ladder formation induced by quercetin was less than that in HL-60 cells, whereas differences between the two cell types were minimal after treatment with luteolin. In addition, quercetin increased the formation of 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-oxodG), an indicator of oxidative DNA damage, in HL-60 cells but not in HP 100 cells. Luteolin did not increase 8-oxodG formation, but inhibited topoisomerase II (topo II) activity of nuclear extract more strongly than quercetin and cleaved DNA by forming a luteolin-topo II-DNA ternary complex. These results suggest that quercetin induces H₂O₂-mediated DNA damage, resulting in apoptosis or mutations, whereas luteolin induces apoptosis via topo II-mediated DNA cleavage. The H₂O₂-mediated DNA damage may be related to the carcinogenic effects of quercetin.