Distinct E2F-mediated transcriptional program regulates p14ARF gene expression

The tumor suppressor p14(ARF) gene is induced by ectopically expressed E2F, a positive regulator of the cell cycle. The gene is expressed at low levels in normally growing cells in contrast to high levels in varieties of tumors. How p14(ARF) gene is regulated by E2F in normally growing cells and tumor cells remains obscure. Here we show that regulation of p14(ARF) gene by E2F is distinct from that of classical E2F targets. It is directly mediated by E2F through a novel E2F-responsive element that varies from the typical E2F site. The element responds to E2F activity resulting from ectopic E2F1 expression, inactivation of pRb by adenovirus E1a or shRNA, but not to phosphorylation of pRb by serum stimulation or ectopic cyclin D1/cyclin-dependent kinase-4 expression in normal human fibroblasts. The element has activity in various tumor cells with defective pRb, but not in normally growing cells. These results indicate that the distinct regulation constitutes the basis of p14(ARF) function as a tumor suppressor, discriminating abnormal growth signals caused by defects in pRb function from normal growth signals.     

Caenorhabditis elegans lin-35/Rb, efl-1/E2F and other synthetic multivulva genes negatively regulate the anaphase-promoting complex gene mat-3/APC8

Retinoblastoma (Rb)/E2F complexes repress expression of many genes important for G(1)-to-S transition, but also appear to regulate gene expression at other stages of the cell cycle. In C. elegans, lin-35/Rb and other synthetic Multivulva (SynMuv) group B genes function redundantly with other sets of genes to regulate G(1)/S progression, vulval and pharyngeal differentiation, and other unknown processes required for viability. Here we show that lin-35/Rb, efl-1/E2F, and other SynMuv B genes negatively regulate a component of the anaphase-promoting complex or cyclosome (APC/C). The APC/C is a multisubunit complex that promotes metaphase-to-anaphase progression and G(1) arrest by targeting different substrates for ubiquitination and proteasome-mediated destruction. The C. elegans APC/C gene mat-3/APC8 has been defined by temperature-sensitive embryonic lethal alleles that strongly affect germline meiosis and mitosis but only weakly affect somatic development. We describe severe nonconditional mat-3 alleles and a hypomorphic viable allele (ku233), all of which affect postembryonic cell divisions including those of the vulval lineage. The ku233 lesion is located outside of the mat-3 coding region and reduces mat-3 mRNA expression. Loss-of-function alleles of lin-35/Rb and other SynMuv B genes suppress mat-3(ku233) defects by restoring mat-3 mRNA to wild-type levels. Therefore, Rb/E2F complexes appear to repress mat-3 expression.     

E‐cadherin determines Caveolin‐1 tumor suppression or metastasis enhancing function in melanoma cells

The role of caveolin‐1 (CAV1) in cancer is highly controversial. CAV1 suppresses genes that favor tumor development, yet also promotes focal adhesion turnover and migration of metastatic cells. How these contrasting observations relate to CAV1 function in vivo is unclear. Our previous studies implicate E‐cadherin in CAV1‐dependent tumor suppression. Here, we use murine melanoma B16F10 cells, with low levels of endogenous CAV1 and E‐cadherin, to unravel how CAV1 affects tumor growth and metastasis and to assess how co‐expression of E‐cadherin modulates CAV1 function in vivo in C57BL/6 mice. We find that overexpression of CAV1 in B16F10 (cav‐1) cells reduces subcutaneous tumor formation, but enhances metastasis relative to control cells. Furthermore, E‐cadherin expression in B16F10 (E‐cad) cells reduces subcutaneous tumor formation and lung metastasis when intravenously injected. Importantly, co‐expression of CAV1 and E‐cadherin in B16F10 (cav‐1/E‐cad) cells abolishes tumor formation, lung metastasis, increased Rac‐1 activity, and cell migration observed with B16F10 (cav‐1) cells. Finally, consistent with the notion that CAV1 participates in switching human melanomas to a more malignant phenotype, elevated levels of CAV1 expression correlated with enhanced migration and Rac‐1 activation in these cells.     

Lysophospholipids open the two-pore domain mechano-gated K(+) channels TREK-1 and TRAAK

The two-pore (2P) domain K(+) channels TREK-1 and TRAAK are opened by membrane stretch as well as arachidonic acid (AA) (Patel, A. J., Honoré, E., Maingret, F., Lesage, F., Fink, M., Duprat, F., and Lazdunski, M. (1998) EMBO J. 17, 4283-4290; Maingret, F., Patel, A. J., Lesage, F., Lazdunski, M., and Honoré, E. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 26691-26696; Maingret, F., Fosset, M., Lesage, F., Lazdunski, M. , and Honoré, E. (1999) J. Biol. Chem. 274, 1381-1387. We demonstrate that lysophospholipids (LPs) and platelet-activating factor also produce large specific and reversible activations of TREK-1 and TRAAK. LPs activation is a function of the size of the polar head and length of the acyl chain but is independent of the charge of the molecule. Bath application of lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) immediately opens TREK-1 and TRAAK in the cell-attached patch configuration. In excised patches, LPC activation is lost, whereas AA still produces maximal opening. The carboxyl-terminal region of TREK-1, but not the amino terminus and the extracellular loop M1P1, is critically required for LPC activation. LPC activation is indirect and may possibly involve a cytosolic factor, whereas AA directly interacts with either the channel proteins or the bilayer and mimics stretch. Opening of TREK-1 and TRAAK by fatty acids and LPs may be an important switch in the regulation of synaptic function and may also play a protective role during ischemia and inflammation.     

E2F and Ras synergize in transcriptionally activating p14ARF expression

The INK4a/ARF locus, which is frequently inactivated in human tumors, encodes two distinct tumor suppressive proteins, ARF and p16INK4a. ARF stabilizes and activates p53 by negating the effects of mdm2 on p53. Furthermore, its function is not restricted to the p53 pathway and it also inhibits cell proliferation in cells lacking p53. Expression of ARF is up-regulated in response to a number of oncogenic stimuli including E2F1. We show here that while oncogenic Ras does not significantly affect p1(4AR)F expression in normal human cells it activates p1(4AR)F in cells containing deregulated E2F. Moreover, oncogenic Ras and E2F1 synergize in activating p1(4AR)F expression. Activation of p1(4AR)F promoter by E2F1 persists in the absence of the consensus E2F-binding sites in this promoter, indicating that this activation also occurs through non- canonical binding sites. The activation by oncogenic Ras requires both E2F and Sp-1 activity, demonstrating the complex regulation of p14(ARF) in response to oncogenic stimuli.