Possible mechanisms of the transforming and tumorigenic effects of DNA-containing animal viruses

The literature devoted to oncogenic action of DNA-containing animal viruses and their role in the development of human neoplasias are reviewed. The regularities of persistence and expression of genetic material of DNA-containing viruses in transformed and tumor cells are comprehensively analyzed. The mechanisms of recombination of cellular and viral DNA during cell transformation as well as the specificity of integration of viral DNA into the host genome are considered. The functions and mechanisms of transforming and tumorigenic action of the products of oncogens of DNA-containing viruses of different groups are discussed. The data on the cell transformation by some DNA-containing viruses without oncogene expression are represented. The mechanism of cell transformation by DNA-containing viruses related to the activation of cellular oncogens is discussed.     

Effect of cellular determination on oncogenic transformation by chemicals and oncogenes.

Three developmentally determined myogenic cell lines derived from C3H 10T1/2 C18 (10T1/2) mouse embryo cells treated with 5-azacytidine were compared with the parental 10T1/2 line for their susceptibility to oncogenic transformation by 3-methylcholanthrene or the activated human c-Ha-ras oncogene. Neither the 10T1/2 cells nor the myogenic derivatives grew in soft agar or formed tumors in nude mice. In contrast to 10T1/2 cells, the three myogenic derivatives were not susceptible to transformation by 3-methylcholanthrene, so that cellular determination altered the response of 10T1/2 cells to chemical carcinogen. On the other hand, all cell types were transformed to a tumorigenic phenotype following transfection with the activated c-Ha-ras gene. The transfected myogenic cells expressed both the c-Ha-ras gene and the muscle determination gene MyoD1. In contrast to other reports, the presence of as many as six copies of the c-Ha-ras gene per genome did not prevent the formation of striated muscle cells which expressed immunologically detectable muscle-specific myosin. The expression of the c-Ha-ras gene does not therefore necessarily preclude the expression of the determination gene for myogenesis or prevent end-stage myogenic differentiation.     

Are type C viruses transforming agents?

Type C RNA viruses have been considered oncogenic because they are found associated with animal tumors and can induce cancers in several animal species. Those viruses that rapidly cause cancer appear to contain an oncogenic gene which resembles genetic sequences present in normal cells. This gene codes for a transforming protein which may be a normal cellular enzyme or a slightly altered cellular product. Its mechanism for transforming a cell is not yet known. Other oncogenic viruses, such as the chronic leukemia viruses, may not produce an oncogenic protein but may affect, by other means, specific target cells so they become malignant. Recent evidence now suggests that the majority of endogenous type C viruses are not transforming agents but inherited in the host to function in other biologic processes. These viruses do not contain transduced cellular genes which are responsible for cancer. Their role probably depends on their expression of other gene products which aid in normal development. These observations suggest that the ultimate control of human cancer may result from the identification of the oncogenic cellular-like genes transduced by some type C viruses even if a true human oncogenic virus is not isolated.     

Dysregulation of cellular microRNAs by human oncogenic viruses – Implications for tumorigenesis

Infection with certain animal and human viruses, often referred to as tumor viruses, induces oncogenic processes in their host. These viruses can induce tumorigenesis through direct and/or indirect mechanisms, and the regulation of microRNAs expression has been shown to play a key role in this process. Some human oncogenic viruses can express their own microRNAs; however, they all can dysregulate the expression of cellular microRNAs, facilitating their respective life cycles. The modulation of cellular microRNAs expression brings consequences to the host cells that may lead to malignant transformation, since microRNAs regulate the expression of genes involved in oncogenic pathways. This review focus on the mechanisms used by each human oncogenic virus to dysregulate the expression of cellular microRNAs, and their impact on tumorigenesis.     

An activating mutation in the murine erythropoietin receptor induces erythroleukemia in mice: a cytokine receptor superfamily oncogene.

A point mutation at codon 129 of the murine erythropoietin receptor (cEpoR) results in constitutive activation. We have generated a recombinant spleen focus-forming retrovirus in which the env gene is replaced by the cEpoR cDNA. Mice infected with this virus (but not by viruses expressing the wild-type EpoR) develop erythrocytosis and splenomegaly. From the spleen of infected animals we have isolated clonal, growth factor-independent, proerythroblast cell lines that express cEpoR, do not express the putative oncogene spi-1, and have rearranged and inactivated expression of the p53 suppressor oncogene. These cells induce erythroleukemia upon injection into mice. This demonstrates that oncogenic point mutations exist in a member of the cytokine receptor superfamily. The activated erythropoietin receptor does not transform cultured fibroblasts, suggesting why oncogenic mutations in other members of this receptor superfamily have not been detected.     

Decreased virus population diversity in p53-null mice infected with weakly oncogenic Abelson virus

The Abelson murine leukemia virus (Ab-MLV), like other retroviruses that contain v-onc genes, arose following a recombination event between a replicating retrovirus and a cellular oncogene. Although experimentally validated models have been presented to address the mechanism by which oncogene capture occurs, very little is known about the events that influence emerging viruses following the recombination event that incorporates the cellular sequences. One feature that may play a role is the genetic makeup of the host in which the virus arises; a number of host genes, including oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes, have been shown to affect the pathogenesis of many murine leukemia viruses. To examine how a host gene might affect an emerging v-onc gene-containing retrovirus, we studied the weakly oncogenic Ab-MLV-P90A strain, a mutant that generates highly oncogenic variants in vivo, and compared the viral populations in normal mice and mice lacking the p53 tumor suppressor gene. While variants arose in both p53+/+ and p53-/- tumors, the samples from the wild-type animals contained a more diverse virus population. Differences in virus population diversity were not observed when wild-type and null animals were infected with a highly oncogenic wild-type strain of Ab-MLV. These results indicate that p53, and presumably other host genes, affects the selective forces that operate on virus populations in vivo and likely influences the evolution of oncogenic retroviruses such as Ab-MLV.     

New molecular mechanisms of virus-mediated carcinogenesis: oncogenic transformation of cells by retroviral structural protein Envelope

RNA tumor viruses as classified in Retroviruses have been isolated and identified to induce tumors in a variety of animals including chickens, mice, and rats, or even in human in the last 100 years, since the first one has been reported in 1908. The RNA tumor viruses have been historically classified into two groups, acute transforming RNA tumor viruses and nonacute RNA tumor viruses. Acute transforming RNA tumor viruses are basically replication-defective and rapidly induce tumors by expressing the viral oncogenes captured from cellular genome in host cells. The first oncogene derived from Rous sarcoma virus was the src non-receptor tyrosine kinase, which has been identified to play the significant roles for signal transduction. On the other hand, nonacute RNA tumor viruses, which consist of only gag, pro, pol, and env regions but do not carry oncogenes, are replication-competent and could activate the cellular proto-oncogenes by inserting the viral long terminal repeat close to the proto-oncogenes to induce tumors with a long incubation period, as is termed a promoter insertion. These molecular mechanisms have been thought to induce tumors. However, very recently several reports have described that the retroviral structural protein Envelope could directly induce tumors in vivo and transform cells in vitro. These are very unusual examples of native retroviral structural proteins with transformation potential. In this review we look back over the history of oncogenic retrovirus research and summarize recent progress for our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of oncogenic transformation by retrovirus Envelope proteins.     

Association of the viral oncoprotein STP-C488 with cellular ras.

The STP-C488 oncogene of herpesvirus saimiri has transforming activity independent of the rest of the viral genome. We now demonstrate that STP-C488 associates with cellular ras in transformed cells. Mutations that disrupted this association with ras disrupted the transforming ability of the STP-C488 oncogene. Binding assays showed that STP-C488 was capable of competing with raf-1 for binding to ras. Expression of STP-C488 activated the ras signaling pathway as evidenced by a two- to fourfold increase in the ratio of ras-GTP to ras-GDP and by the constitutive activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase. Consistent with an activation of signaling through ras, STP-C488 expression induced ras-dependent neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells. STP-C488 is the first virus-encoded protein shown to achieve oncogenic transformation via association with cellular ras.     

Opposing oncogenic activities of small DNA tumor virus transforming proteins

The E1A gene of species C human adenovirus is an intensely investigated model viral oncogene that immortalizes primary cells and mediates oncogenic cell transformation in cooperation with other viral or cellular oncogenes. Investigations using E1A proteins have illuminated important paradigms in cell proliferation and about the functions of cellular proteins such as the retinoblastoma protein. Studies with E1A have led to the unexpected discovery that E1A also suppresses cell transformation and oncogenesis. Here, I review our current understanding of the transforming and tumor-suppressive functions of E1A, and how E1A studies led to the discovery of a related tumor-suppressive function in benign human papillomaviruses. The potential role of these opposing functions in viral replication in epithelial cells is also discussed.     

Co-transfection of normal NIH/3T3 DNA and retroval LTR sequences: a novel strategy for the detection of potential c-onc genes.

Morphologically transformed, tumorigenic cell lines were obtained after co-transfecting normal NIH/3T3 DNA and cloned 3'-long terminal repeat sequences of Moloney leukemia virus (Mo-LTR) onto NIH/3T3 recipient cells. In four such cell lines the malignant phenotype was found to be associated with single and specific Mo-LTR integration sites that were retained after serial passages through NIH/3T3 and rat 208F cells, indicating that Mo-LTR sequences are linked to the activated oncogenes. In one of these clones the activated transforming gene was identified as c-raf, the cellular homologue of a recently described retroviral oncogene. This finding not only demonstrates that the mouse c-raf gene can be activated to exhibit an oncogenic potential but also that the approach chosen in this study is suitable for the detection of potential c-onc genes. In contrast to this clone, the activated transforming genes in other cell lines appear to be different from 19 previously isolated v-onc and c-onc genes. These results demonstrate the potential of the established transformation system for the detection and isolation of previously unidentified c-onc genes.     

Induction of a cellular enzyme for energy metabolism by transforming domains of adenovirus E1a.

Brain creatine kinase is a major enzyme of cellular energy metabolism. It is overexpressed in a wide range of tumor cell lines and is used as a tumor marker. We reported recently that the promoter of the human gene has a strong sequence similarity to the adenovirus E2E promoter. This similarity suggested that the brain creatine kinase gene may be regulated by the viral activator E1a. Experiments reported here showed that both enzyme activity and mRNA levels were induced by the oncogenic products of the E1a region of adenovirus type 5, but unlike the viral E2E promoter, which is induced predominantly by E1a domain 3, brain creatine kinase induction required domains 1 and 2. These domains are important for transformation and for the association of E1a with the retinoblastoma gene product and other cellular proteins. The induction by an oncogene of a cellular gene for energy metabolism may be of significance for the metabolic events that take place after oncogenic activation.     

Adenovirus E1A gene induction of susceptibility to lysis by natural killer cells and activated macrophages in infected rodent cells.

Rodent cells immortalized by the E1A gene of nononcogenic adenoviruses are susceptible to lysis by natural killer (NK) cells and activated macrophages. This cytolysis-susceptible phenotype may contribute to the rejection of adenovirus-transformed cells by immunocompetent animals. Such increased cytolytic susceptibility has also been observed with infected rodent cells. This infection model provided a means to study the role of E1A gene products in induction of cytolytic susceptibility without cell selection during transformation. Deletion mutations outside of the E1A gene had no effect on adenovirus type 2 (Ad2) or Ad5 induction of cytolytic susceptibility in infected hamster cells, while E1A-minus mutant viruses could not induce this phenotype. E1A mutant viruses that induced expression of either E1A 12S or 13S mRNA in infected cells were competent to induce cytolytic susceptibility. Furthermore, there was a correlation between the accumulation of E1A gene products in Ad5-infected cells and the level of susceptibility of such target cells to lysis by NK cells. The results of coinfection studies indicated that the E1A gene products of highly oncogenic Ad12 could not complement the lack of induction of cytolytic susceptibility by E1A-minus Ad5 virus in infected cells and also could not block induction of this infected-cell phenotype by Ad5. These data suggest that expression of the E1A gene of nononcogenic adenoviruses may cause the elimination of infected cells by the immunologically nonspecific host inflammatory cell response prior to cellular transformation. The lack of induction of this cytolysis-susceptible phenotype by Ad12 E1A may result in an increased persistence of Ad12-infected cells in vivo and may lead to an increased Ad12-transformed cell burden for the host.     

Mutagenic effect of the SV40 oncogene: induction of resistance to 6-mercaptopurine and serum independence

The mutagenic and transforming activity of SV40 DNA fragment, corresponding to its oncogene (the gene for large T antigen) was studied in Chinese hamster cells. After expression time of 3 to 4 days, the oncogene induced mutations of resistance to 6-mercaptopurine (6MP), while the DNA encoding the SV40 late genes, as well as DNA of Chinese hamster cells, were devoid of mutagenic activity. The value of induction ranged from 10(-4) to 10(-5). After the same expression time, the oncogene induced a typical character of oncogenic transformation - independence of serum growth factors (ser+). The value of induction of ser+ variants was somewhat higher than for resistance mutations. The study of 12 clones induced by the oncogene has shown the ser+ character to be hereditary, the expression of viral oncogene being not necessary for its maintenance. The data obtained support the hypothesis in favour of the participation of mutations of cellular genes in viral carcinogenesis.