Importance of the nasal-to-cervical relationship to the profile in rhinoplasty surgery

There is general agreement that when discussing surgery with the prospective rhinoplasty patient, one may also include discussion of the chin because of the important interrelationship between these two regions. It is apparent that on the profile-lateral view, the four prominences-the forehead, nose, chin, and neck-balance and complement one another. The cervical region, the fourth dimension, was examined to estimate the aesthetic significance of the nasal-to-cervical relationship and to determine the implications to rhinoplasty surgery.Part I of the study was a survey to test the hypothesis that the cervical region affects the perceived impression of the nose. Four standard facial-profile black-and-white photographs were chosen to represent varying degrees of nasal dorsum hump and cervical ptosis problems. Using computer-altering software, only the cervical regions were altered to create a pair of photographs for each of the four profiles: one with a youthful-looking non-ptotic cervical region, the other with a ptotic aged-looking cervical region. Raters were asked to give their first-impression opinions of which nose subjectively appeared "better." Raters consistently (84 percent of the time) chose the nose on the faces with the less ptotic neck as being better. Therefore, a less ptotic neck improved the perceived appearance of the nose.Part II was a retrospective chart review of the rhinoplasty patients of a single surgeon by independent raters. To estimate the aesthetic significance of the nasal-to-cervical relationship, the proportion of patients undergoing rhinoplasty surgery who could have potentially benefited from a youth-restoring neck procedure was determined. Criteria originally described by Ellenbogen and Karlin for judging the results of youth-restoring neck procedures were used as relative indications for neck surgery. An average of 27.2 percent of the patients did not have visible criteria and therefore by definition had relative indications for neck-rejuvenating procedures when undergoing rhinoplasty surgery. As demonstrated in part I of the study, improving the neck could improve the perceived results of the rhinoplasty.Part III of the study validated the Ellenbogen and Karlin criteria. The present authors found that the original criteria were probably based on female patients, that male and older patients had more indications for surgery, and that there was significant interrater agreement with the youthful criteria.In summary, the authors established that a strong nasal-to-cervical relationship exists whereby the perceived appearance of the nose is affected by the neck. The significance of this relationship to rhinoplasty surgery was determined, and it was found that more than 27 percent of rhinoplasty patients could obtain better perceived nasal results with a concomitant neck-rejuvenating procedure. Consequently, discussing neck-rejuvenating procedures with the rhinoplasty patient is valuable.     

The Turkish delight: a pliable graft for rhinoplasty

In nose surgery, carved or crushed cartilage used as a graft has some disadvantages, chiefly that it may be perceptible through the nasal skin after tissue resolution is complete. To overcome these problems and to obtain a smoother surface, the authors initiated the use of Surgicel-wrapped diced cartilage. This innovative technique has been used by the authors on 2365 patients over the past 10 years: in 165 patients with traumatic nasal deformity, in 350 patients with postrhinoplasty deformity, and in 1850 patients during primary rhinoplasty. The highlights of the surgical procedure include harvested cartilage (septal, alar, conchal, and sometimes costal) cut in pieces of 0.5 to 1 mm using a no. 11 blade. The fine-textured cartilage mass is then wrapped in one layer of Surgicel and moistened with an antibiotic (rifamycin). The graft is then molded into a cylindrical form and inserted under the dorsal nasal skin. In the lateral wall and tip of the nose, some overcorrection is performed depending on the type of deformity. When the mucosal stitching is complete, this graft can be externally molded, like plasticine, under the dorsal skin. In cases of mild-to-moderate nasal depression, septal and conchal cartilages are used in the same manner to augment the nasal dorsum with consistently effective and durable results. In cases with more severe defects of the nose, costal cartilage is necessary to correct both the length of the nose and the projection of the columella. In patients with recurrent deviation of the nasal bridge, this technique provided a simple solution to the problem. After overexcision of the dorsal part of deviated septal cartilage and insertion of Surgicel-wrapped diced cartilage, a straight nose was obtained in all patients with no recurrence (follow-up of 1 to 10 years). The technique also proved to be highly effective in primary rhinoplasties to camouflage bone irregularities after hump removal in patients with thin nasal skin and/or in cases when excessive hump removal was performed. As a complication, in six patients early postoperative swelling was more than usual. In 16 patients, overcorrection was persistent owing to fibrosis, and in 11 patients resorption was excessive beyond the expected amount. A histologic evaluation was possible in 16 patients, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively, by removing thin slices of excess cartilage from the dorsum of the nose during touch-up surgery. This graft showed a mosaic-type alignment of graft cartilage with fibrous tissue connection among the fragments. In conclusion, this type of graft is very easy to apply, because a plasticine-like material is obtained that can be molded with the fingers, giving a smooth surface with desirable form and long-lasting results in all cases. The favorable results obtained by this technique have led the authors to use Surgicel-wrapped diced cartilage routinely in all types of rhinoplasty.     

The role of septal surgery in management of the deviated nose

The deviated nose represents a complex cosmetic and functional problem. Septal surgery plays a central role in the successful management of the externally deviated nose. This study included 260 patients seeking rhinoplasty to correct external nasal deviations; 75 percent of them had various degrees of nasal obstruction. Septal surgery was necessary in 232 patients (89 percent), not only to improve breathing but also to achieve a straight, symmetrical, external nose as well. A graduated surgical approach was adopted to allow correction of the dorsal and caudal deviations of the nasal septum without weakening its structural support to the dorsum or nasal tip. The approach depended on full mobilization of deviated cartilage, followed by straightening of the cartilage and its fixation in the corrected position by using bony splinting grafts through an external rhinoplasty approach.     

Component dorsal hump reduction: the importance of maintaining dorsal aesthetic lines in rhinoplasty

Dorsal hump reduction can create both functional and aesthetic problems if performed incorrectly. Component dorsal hump reduction allows a graduated approach to the correction of the nasal dorsum by emphasizing the integrity of the upper lateral cartilages when performing dorsal reduction. Use of this approach can minimize the need for spreader grafts in primary rhinoplasty patients. Possible untoward sequelae of dorsal hump reduction include long-term dorsal irregularities caused by uneven resection or overresection or underresection of the osseocartilaginous hump irregularity; the inverted-V deformity; and excessive narrowing of the midvault. The component dorsal hump reduction technique is a five-step method: (1) separation of the upper lateral cartilages from the septum, (2) incremental reduction of the septum proper, (3) dorsal bony reduction, (4) verification by palpation, and (5) final modifications (spreader grafts, suturing techniques, osteotomies). A graduated approach is described that offers control and precision at each interval. Fundamental to the final outcome is the protection and formation of strong dorsal aesthetic lines that define the appearance of the dorsum on frontal view. Furthermore, preservation of the transverse portions of the upper lateral cartilages is essential to maintain patency of the internal nasal valve, maintain the shape of the dorsal aesthetic lines, and avoid the inverted-V deformity. Finally, if needed, spreader grafts are enormously adaptable and can be customized for any deformity (unilateral or bilateral, visible or invisible) to handle functional or aesthetic problems.     

The depressed nasofrontal angle in aesthetic rhinoplasty

Certain patients seeking cosmetic rhinoplasty present with a so-called depressed nasofrontal angle. In this condition, the most careful part of the nasal bone is underdeveloped. This gives the illusion of a nasal hump. Complete removal of this hump will create a hypoplastic nose. Partial reduction of the hump and augmentation in the nasofrontal area are indicated in these patients. Autogenous material is preferable for this purpose. A number of patients are presented with illustration of the technique.     

The "iatrogenic-hanging columella": preserving columellar contour after tip retroprojection

This article discusses a method for treating the ultraprojecting tip by the resection of columellar skin in open rhinoplasty. Lack of postoperative contraction of columellar skin and soft tissue may result in an "iatrogenic-hanging columella." Columellar skin resection frequently produces its own deformities because of a discrepancy in the width of the columellar base side and the infralobular flap side. The ultraprojecting tip was present in 56 of 660 consecutive rhinoplasty patients (8 percent) over 8 years (1991 to 1998). Of these 56 patients, 48 underwent partial resection of the infralobular skin flap. Of these 48 patients, eight (17 percent) required secondary skin revision of the columellar resection area. The technique was then modified since 1998. Over 2 years, 13 of 129 consecutive rhinoplasty patients (10 percent) were judged to have an ultraprojecting tip. Of these, eight patients were treated with a modification in the technique by resecting skin on the posterior columellar base. No resection areas were revised in the second series. Of the 789 patients in both series, 647 (82 percent) underwent primary rhinoplasties, 126 (16 percent) had secondary rhinoplasties, and 16 (2 percent) had tertiary rhinoplasties. The treatment of excess columella skin adds a subtle aesthetic improvement to the postoperative nasal contour. By resecting skin on the posterior columellar base or the posterior columellar base and, rarely, the anterior flap, an iatrogenic-hanging columella can be avoided.     

Resection of obstructing inferior turbinates following rhinoplasty

Total inferior turbinectomy was carried out in 38 patients who complained of nasal obstruction following rhinoplasty or rhinoseptoplasty and in whom hypertrophied inferior turbinates were found to be the cause of obstruction. Postoperatively, relief of nasal obstruction was reported by 84 percent of patients, while rhinoscopy showed wide, clean nasal airways in 92 percent. Nasal airflow measurements in 32 tested patients showed increased patency in all of them, including 3 who still complained of nasal obstruction postoperatively. The follow-up period ranged from 1 to 7 years (mean 2.8 years). Atrophic changes of the nasal mucosa or chronic purulent infection was not observed in any of the patients. Because the results of partial procedures on the inferior turbinates are often unsatisfactory, I suggest performing total inferior turbinectomy in patients with obstructing inferior turbinates following rhinoplasty.     

Primary correction of unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity in Asian patients: anthropometric evaluation

Previously it was thought that primary correction of nasal deformity in cleft lip patients would cause developmental impairment of the nose. It is now widely accepted that simultaneous correction of the cleft lip nasal deformity has no adverse effect on nasal growth. Thus, the authors tried to evaluate the results of primary correction of cleft lip in Asian patients. Of 412 cases of cleft lip, 195 cases were corrected by means of the conventional method from June of 1992 to June of 1997, and 217 cases were corrected by simultaneous rhinoplasty from July of 1997 to October of 2001. The average patient age was 3 months. Photographs and anthropometric evaluation were used to evaluate the results. Nasal tip projection, columellar length, and nasal width were measured in 60 randomized normal children, 30 randomized children treated with the conventional method, and 30 randomized children with primary nasal repair. Data were analyzed using t tests, and the level of significance was 5 percent (p < 0.05). In cases of simultaneous repair, nasal tip projection and columellar length were increased 24.8 percent and 28.8 percent, respectively. Nasal width was increased 12.3 percent in the cases of simultaneous repair and 12.6 percent in the cases without primary rhinoplasty. Simultaneous repair of cleft lip and nasal deformity in Asian patients showed that more symmetry of nostril and nasal dome projection and better correction of buckling and alar flaring were achieved. More balanced growth and development of the alar complex was achieved, and no interference with nasal growth was encountered.     

The alar contour graft: correction and prevention of alar rim deformities in rhinoplasty

One of the most common problems affecting both the primary and secondary rhinoplasty patient is deformity of the alar rim. Typically, this deformity is caused by congenital malpositioning, hypoplasia, or surgical weakening of the lateral crura, with the potential for both functional and aesthetic ramifications. Successful correction and prevention of alar rim deformities requires precise preoperative diagnosis and planning. Multiple techniques of varying complexity have been described to treat this common and challenging problem.Over the past 6 years (1994 through 2000), the authors have employed a simple technique in 123 patients for alar retraction that involves the nonanatomic insertion of an autogenous cartilage buttress into an alar-vestibular pocket. Among the 53 patients who underwent primary rhinoplasty in this study, 91 percent experienced correction or prevention of alar notching or collapse. However, correction was achieved for only 73 percent of the patients who underwent secondary rhinoplasty; many of whom had alar retraction secondary to scarring or lining loss. In patients with moderate or significant lining loss or scarring, a lateral crural strut graft is recommended. The alar contour graft provides the foundation in the patient undergoing primary or secondary rhinoplasty for the reestablishment of a normally functioning external nasal valve and an aesthetically pleasing alar contour. This article discusses the anatomic and aesthetic considerations of alar rim deformities and the indications and the surgical technique for the alar contour graft.     

The two essential elements for planning tip surgery in primary and secondary rhinoplasty: observations based on review of 100 consecutive patients

Nasal tip surgery has become significantly more complex since the introduction of tip grafting and the many suture designs that followed the resurgence of open rhinoplasty. Independent of the surgeon's technical approach, however, is the need to identify the critical anatomical characteristics that will make nasal tip surgery successful. It is the author's contention that only two such features require mandatory preoperative identification: (1) whether the tip is adequately projecting and (2) whether the alar cartilage lateral crura are orthotopic or cephalically rotated ("malpositioned"). Data were generated from a review of 100 consecutive primary rhinoplasty patients on whom the author had operated. The results indicate that only 33 percent of the entire group had adequate preoperative tip projection and only 54 percent had orthotopic lateral crura (axes toward the lateral canthi). Forty-six percent of the patients had lateral crura that were cephalically rotated (axes toward the medial canthi). Both inadequate tip projection and convex lateral crura were more common among patients with malpositioned lateral crura (78 percent and 61 percent) than in patients with orthotopic lateral crura (57 percent and 20 percent, respectively). Tip projection can be reliably assessed by the relationship of the tip lobule to the septal angle. Malposition is characterized by abnormal lateral crural axes, long alar creases that extend to the nostril rims, alar wall hollows, frequent nostril deformities, and associated external valvular incompetence. The data suggest that the surgeon treating the average spectrum of primary rhinoplasty patients will see a majority (61 percent) who need increased tip support and a significant number (46 percent) with an anatomical variant (alar cartilage malposition) that places these patients at special risk for postoperative functional impairment. Correction of external valvular incompetence doubles nasal airflow in most patients. As few as 23 percent of primary rhinoplasty patients (the number with orthotopic, projecting alar cartilages in this series) may be proper candidates for reduction-only tip procedures. When tip projection and lateral crural orientation are accurately determined before surgery, nasal tip surgery can proceed successfully and secondary deformities can be avoided.     

Chin augmentation with nasal osteocartilaginous graft

The use of the nasal hump removed during rhinoplasty was described by Aufricht in 1934 and 1958. In the past 10 years, the author has been using a similar technique but with significant variations. Before beginning the rhinoplasty surgery, the author dissects, through a submental incision, a subperiosteal mental pocket. Then, the osteocartilaginous nasal hump is removed; once the mucoperiosteum/mucoperichondrium is meticulously dissected, the nasal hump is tailored to achieve a mental form and the removed alar cartilage, nasal spine, or septal cartilage is used to fill or supplement the concavities of the hump. This report includes a total of 36 cases, 10 of which were controlled after 3 to 8 years of implantation by tridimensional computed tomography, from which the author observed an osteointegration with the mandibular bone and no reabsorption of the grafts or alteration of the structure of this bone. The patients revealed a high degree of satisfaction, and during the clinical examination, the author could not observe or palpate any distortion of the shape or projection of the chin. None of the grafts needed review or removal. This simple, fast procedure is a very good alternative for patients with some form of microgenia or when patients and surgeons are not likely to use alloplastic implants.     

Indications and use of composite grafts in 100 consecutive secondary and tertiary rhinoplasty patients: introduction of the axial orientation

The fragile alar rims are complex structures whose specialized and supportive skin ensures the competence of the external valves and the patency of the inlets to the nasal airways. A chart review was performed of 100 consecutive secondary or tertiary rhinoplasty patients in whom the author had placed composite grafts before February 1999. Follow-up continued for at least 12 months. In 94 percent of the patients, composite grafts were harvested from the cymba conchae by removing the cartilage with its adherent anterior skin. In 6 percent of the patients, independently indicated alar wedges supplied the grafts. Six patients required secondary procedures to thin the alar rims, but such revisions have not been necessary since primary contouring of the cartilaginous graft component was instituted. Three auricular donor-site complications (one keloid, two thickened graft contours) were successfully revised through office procedures. Prior cosmetic rhinoplasty in a patient with normal alar cartilage anatomy exceeded all other etiologies as the cause of the deformity for which composite grafts were indicated (50 percent). The second most common etiology was deformity from prior rhinoplasty in a patient with alar cartilage malposition (33 percent of patients). Congenital deformities (7 percent of patients), trauma (6 percent), and prior tumor ablation (4 percent) comprised the remaining etiologies. Composite grafts were used most frequently to correct alar notching or asymmetry in rim height (43 percent of patients) or to provide an increase in apparent or real nasal length (28 percent). External valvular incompetence (14 percent of patients), nostril or vestibular stenosis (11 percent), or combined vestibular stenosis and lateral alar wall collapse (4 percent) were less common indications. Most composite grafts were oriented in the coronal plane (parallel to the alar rims). However, nostril or vestibular stenosis was corrected by sagittally placed composite grafts, and a third orientation (axial plane), to the author's knowledge not described previously, was used in patients with combined nostril stenoses and flattening of the alar walls. In this secondary rhinoplasty series, iatrogenic alar rim deformities or stenoses following cosmetic rhinoplasty dominated other causes requiring composite graft reconstruction (83 percent of patients). Of these 83 patients, 39.7 percent had preexisting alar cartilage malpositions, further supporting the importance of making accurate anatomical diagnosis part of every preoperative rhinoplasty plan.     

Four common anatomic variants that predispose to unfavorable rhinoplasty results: a study based on 150 consecutive secondary rhinoplasties

A retrospective study was conducted of 150 consecutive secondary rhinoplasty patients operated on by the author before February of 1999, to test the hypothesis that four anatomic variants (low radix/low dorsum, narrow middle vault, inadequate tip projection, and alar cartilage malposition) strongly predispose to unfavorable rhinoplasty results. The incidences of each variant were compared with those in 50 consecutive primary rhinoplasty patients. Photographs before any surgery were available in 61 percent of the secondary patients; diagnosis in the remaining individuals was made from operative reports, physical diagnosis, or patient history. Low radix/low dorsum was present in 93 percent of the secondary patients and 32 percent of the primary patients; narrow middle vault was present in 87 percent of the secondary patients and 38 percent of the primary patients; inadequate tip projection was present in 80 percent of the secondary patients and 31 percent of the primary patients; and alar cartilage malposition was present in 42 percent of the secondary patients and 18 percent of the primary patients. In the 150-patient secondary group, the most common combination was the triad of low radix, narrow middle vault, and inadequate tip projection (40 percent of patients). The second largest group (27 percent) had shared all four anatomic points before their primary rhinoplasties. Seventy-eight percent of the secondary patients had three or all four anatomic variants in some combination; each secondary patient had at least one of the four traits; 99 percent had two or more. Seventy-eight percent of the primary patients had at least two variants, and 58 percent had three or more. Twenty-two percent of the primary patients had none of the variants and therefore would presumably not be predisposed to unfavorable results following traditional reduction rhinoplasty. This study supports the contention that four common anatomic variants, if unrecognized, are strongly associated with unfavorable results following primary rhinoplasty. It is important for all surgeons performing rhinoplasty to recognize these anatomic variants to avoid the unsatisfactory functional and aesthetic sequelae that they may produce by making their correction a deliberate part of each preoperative surgical plan.     

Primary correction of the unilateral cleft nasal deformity

An 18-year experience with the management of the unilateral cleft nasal deformity in 1200 patients is presented. A primary cleft nasal correction was performed at the time of lip repair in infancy; a secondary rhinoplasty was done in adolescence after nasal growth was complete. The technical details of the authors' primary cleft nasal correction are described. Exposure was obtained through the incisions of the rotation-advancement design. The cartilaginous framework was widely undermined from the skin envelope. The nasal lining was released from the piriform aperture, and a new maxillary platform was created on the cleft side by rotating a "muscular roll" underneath the cleft nasal ala. The alar web was then managed by using a mattress suture running from the web cartilage to the facial musculature. In 60 percent of cases, these maneuvers were sufficient to produce symmetrical dome projection and nostril symmetry. In the other 40 percent, characterized by more severe hypoplasia of the cleft lower lateral cartilage, an inverted U infracartilaginous incision and an alar dome supporting suture (Tajima) to the contralateral upper cartilage were used. Residual dorsal hooding of the lower lateral cartilage was most effectively managed with this suture. This primary approach to the cleft nasal deformity permits more balanced growth and development of the ala and domal complex. Some of the psychological trauma of the early school years may be avoided. Also, because of the early repositioning of the cleft nasal cartilages, the deformity addressed at the time of the adult rhinoplasty is less severe and more amenable to an optimal final result.     

Differing characteristics in 100 consecutive secondary rhinoplasty patients following closed versus open surgical approaches

Open rhinoplasty has unquestionably become more popular during the past two decades because of the putative diagnostic and technical advantages that direct transcolumellar access offers. To test the hypothesis that patients initially treated by the opened or closed approaches differed in the secondary deformities that developed, a retrospective study was conducted of 100 consecutive secondary rhinoplasty patients (66 women and 34 men) operated on by the author before February of 1998. Sixty-four percent had previously undergone closed rhinoplasties and 36 had undergone open rhinoplasties; the incidence of prior open rhinoplasty had increased steadily over the survey years, from 21 percent in 1996 to more than 50 percent in 1998, 1999, and 2000 (p < 0.05). The data generated indicate the following. First, the open rhinoplasty patients had undergone more operations (3.1 versus 1.2) and had more presenting complaints (5.8 versus 2.6) than the closed rhinoplasty patients. Second, although the most common presenting complaint among prior closed rhinoplasty patients was an overresected dorsum (50 percent) or tip (33 percent) or internal valvular obstruction (42 percent), prior open rhinoplasty patients complained more frequently than the closed rhinoplasty patients of these problems and also external valvular obstruction (50 percent, p < 0.0001), short nose (39 percent, p < 0.001), wide columella (36 percent, p < 0.001), narrow nose (31 percent, p < 0.001), columellar scar (25 percent, p < 0.001), and symptomatic columellar struts (19 percent, p < 0.001). Only excessive nasal length was more prevalent among closed rhinoplasty patients (20 percent, p < 0.01). Third, ranking of deformities differed significantly (p < 0.0001) between the two groups, so that complaints related to the nostrils, nasal tip, nasal length, or columella were more common among the open rhinoplasty patients than among those previously treated endonasally. Fourth, the relative frequencies of surgical complaints also differed: whereas patients previously treated endonasally were 6.7 times more likely to complain of long noses, patients previously treated by open rhinoplasty complained more frequently of the following: excessive columellar width (open approach, 36 percent of patients; closed approach, none), hard columellar struts (open approach, 19 percent of patients; closed approach, none), external valvular obstruction (4.5 times as frequent with the open approach as it was with the closed approach), alar/nostril distortion (four times as frequent), and narrow nose (3.9 times). Although the most common complaints among all postrhinoplasty patients remain the overresected dorsum, tip, or (internal valvular) airway obstruction, the author's data suggest that patients previously treated by the open approach are more likely to have postsurgical deformities and complaints referable to those anatomic structures most easily reached by transcolumellar exposure and to techniques that can be performed more readily or aggressively through that access route.     

Achieving consistency in the lateral nasal osteotomy during rhinoplasty: an external perforated technique.

The lateral nasal osteotomy is an integral element in rhinoplasty. A reproducible and predictable technique for the lateral nasal osteotomy (when indicated) is a significant contributor to operative success. A variety of methods and instrumentation are used to produce lateral osteotomies; currently, the two different modes used most frequently are the internal continuous and external perforated techniques. A previously published study by the senior author detailed the benefits of the external perforated osteotomy after comparing the two different methods. This article describes the role of the external perforated osteotomy technique in reproducing consistent results in rhinoplasty with minimal postoperative complications.     

Primary definitive nasal correction in patients presenting for late unilateral cleft lip repair

Almost 25 percent of unilateral cleft lip and palate patients present with their deformity in their teens or later years in the developing world. Because more than 80 percent of the world population lives in the developing world, the established protocol for repair of these deformities is not applicable to these patients. Despite the magnitude, there are no significant reports in the literature that deal with this problem. Several issues need to be addressed, but the author limits himself here to the correction of the nasal deformity. The patients at this age are very much concerned with the aesthetic outcome. Procedures described hitherto for primary nasal correction in infants are not successful in restoring nasal shape and symmetry at this late age of presentation. Our experience with radical correction of secondary nasal deformity in unilateral cleft lip patients presenting late prompted us to extend the concept by undertaking a definitive primary correction of the nasal deformity in cleft patients presenting late. Twenty-two patients with unilateral cleft lip deformity (nine male patients and 13 female patients) with ages ranging from 13 to 22 years, presenting between August of 1997 and December of 2000, are included in this study. Of these, 11 patients had a cleft of the lip alone, eight also had a cleft of the alveolus, and three had a cleft of the palate continuous with the cleft lip. All patients showed some maxillary hypoplasia. An external rhinoplasty with lip repair was carried out in all patients. The corrective procedures on the nose included columellar lengthening; augmentation along the pyriform margin, nasal floor, and alveolus using bone grafts; submucous resection of the nasal septum; repositioning of lower lateral cartilages; and augmentation of nasal dorsum by bone graft. Clinical follow-up ranged from 4 to 24 months, and the median follow-up period was 13 months. Results have been very good, and much better than results seen earlier with other primary rhinoplasty techniques. While repairing unilateral cleft lip in adolescents, the author thinks it would be most appropriate to address the entire gamut of the deformity in a single stage, provide complete vector reorientation, and augment the hypoplastic elements by autologous tissue. It is not just the fear of poor follow-up, but that merely correcting the lip deformity in these patients without attempting definitive rhinoplasty, in the author's opinion, would be insufficient surgical intervention.     

Augmentation rhinoplasty: observations on 1200 cases

Over the past 14 years, from January of 1975 to December of 1988, we have done 1263 aesthetic rhinoplasties using ear cartilage. In the field of augmentation rhinoplasty, many kinds of materials, such as bone, septal cartilage, ear cartilage, and prostheses, were used. In this paper, we limit discussion to our experience with the technique for the augmentation of the nasal dorsum using the ear cartilage and compare this with other materials. Patient ages ranged from 15 to 72 years, with an average of 24 years. Some 95 percent of patients (1199) were female, and only 5 percent (64) were male. Patients were followed for a minimum of 6 months and a maximum of 20 months, with average follow-up only 8 months. Of course, we know that this is a very short follow-up period, but we could not follow patients longer because if they had no complaint about the results at the 6-month visit, they never returned, despite our efforts. Five-hundred and ten of the 1263 patients (40 percent) had been augmented elsewhere, and the silicone prosthesis was already in place. However, 753 patients (60 percent) had no previous operation. For the 510 patients (secondary rhinoplasty patients), too-high or too-large a prosthesis was the largest complaint in number, totaling 378 cases (74 percent), and psychological dissatisfaction, such as pain or an uncomfortable sensation, was the second largest in number, totaling 104 cases (20 percent). For the 753 patients (primary rhinoplasty patients), the main complaint was too-short or too-flat a nose (100 percent).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

The expert teaching system: a new method for learning rhinoplasty using interactive computer graphics

We have developed software that employs interactive computer graphics to simulate the surgical experience of rhinoplasty by allowing the surgeon to experiment within a model of nasal behavior. For any of three preoperative noses, the surgeon can choose and see the effects of dorsal resection, modification of nasal spine or caudal septum, alar cartilage resection, osteotomy, alar wedge resection, and a variety of nasal grafts. The available choices and views total nearly 3000 images, or approximately 200 different surgical solutions. The surgeon can get textual analysis at any time or see accelerated healing to the projected nasal appearance at 1 year. We believe that the ability to experiment without risk, to safely learn the biological laws governing nasal behavior, should augment the development of surgical judgement in rhinoplasty.     

Nasal osteotomies: a clinical comparison of the perforating methods versus the continuous technique

Do perforating lateral osteotomies cause less ecchymosis and edema compared with the popular continuous method? Many studies have demonstrated that perforated osteotomies cause less trauma and periosteal disruption. Numerous investigators have subjectively perceived less postoperative ecchymosis and edema, but no clinical study has compared the perforated methods versus the continuous technique in the same patient. This prospective, randomized, partially blinded study was designed to test the hypothesis that the perforating method causes less postoperative ecchymosis and edema compared with the continuous lateral osteotomy technique. The questions remain: does the type of perforating osteotomy affect the results? Does a percutaneous approach cause more ecchymosis and edema by the access maneuver of piercing the skin? The two perforating lateral nasal osteotomy techniques require the same 2-mm straight osteotome, so any genuine difference in postoperative ecchymosis or edema could only be attributed to the differing surgical approaches. Accordingly, this study also tests whether the external percutaneous perforating osteotomy causes more ecchymosis and edema than the internal transnasal perforating method. Twenty-five consecutive rhinoplasty patients (group A) requiring bilateral osteotomies (50 total lateral osteotomies) were randomized so that each patient received an internal/transnasal perforating lateral osteotomy (2-mm straight chisel) on one side and an internal/transnasal continuous osteotomy (4-mm curved, guarded osteotome) on the other. The next 25 patients studied (group B) received an external/percutaneous perforating lateral osteotomy (same 2-mm straight chisel as used in group A) on one side and the same internal/transnasal continuous osteotomy on the other. The final 25 consecutive rhinoplasty patients (group C) received an external percutaneous perforating lateral osteotomy on one side and an internal transnasal perforating lateral osteotomy on the other. The entry sites for the perforating osteotomies were either external (groups B and C) with a percutaneous skin puncture or intranasal (groups A and C) at the pyriform aperture. All 75 patients (150 total lateral osteotomies) initialed the surgical plan on the Gunter rhinoplasty worksheet, which has been approved by the Institutional Review Board of Abbott-Northwestern Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota (study no. 1341-1 M). All patients were evaluated for ecchymosis and edema on the left versus the right side of the face at 2 to 3, 7, and 21 days after the operation. The clinical evaluation was performed by two blinded examiners (clinic registered nurse and the patient with his or her family) and a partially blinded examiner (the surgeon, who did not refresh his memory about the randomization). To compare the two methods in each study (groups A, B, and C) for the six outcomes (edema and ecchymosis at 2 to 3, 7, and 21 days), the authors used an exact binomial test of the null hypothesis that the treatments do not differ. To compare the two methods in each study (groups A, B, and C) using all six outcomes simultaneously, the authors used a permutation test. By both testing methods, the perforating internal method was superior to the continuous technique (group A; p < 0.01 in both tests). Although the perforating external method gave better results than the continuous technique (group B) and the perforating internal method gave better results than the perforating external method (group C), neither of these differences was significant by either testing method. A lateral osteotomy technique should be precise, reproducible, and safe, and it should minimize ecchymosis and edema. Since edema and ecchymosis are comparable regardless of osteotome size, this prospective randomized study confirms the subjective clinical impression that perforating lateral osteotomies with a 2-mm straight osteotome reduce postoperative ecchymosis and edema in rhinoplasty patients compared with the continuous osteotomy (4-mm curved, guarded osteotome). These findings should encourage te the use of perforating osteotomies rather than continuous osteotomies.