Bacterial outer membrane secretin PulD assembles and inserts into the inner membrane in the absence of its pilotin

Dodecamerization and insertion of the outer membrane secretin PulD is entirely determined by the C-terminal half of the polypeptide (PulD-CS). In the absence of its cognate chaperone PulS, PulD-CS and PulD mislocalize to the inner membrane, from which they are extractable with detergents but not urea. Electron microscopy of PulD-CS purified from the inner membrane revealed apparently normal dodecameric complexes. Electron microscopy of PulD-CS and PulD in inner membrane vesicles revealed inserted secretin complexes. Mislocalization of PulD or PulD-CS to this membrane induces the phage shock response, probably as a result of a decreased membrane electrochemical potential. Production of PulD in the absence of the phage shock response protein PspA and PulS caused a substantial drop in membrane potential and was lethal. Thus, PulD-CS and PulD assemble in the inner membrane if they do not associate with PulS. We propose that PulS prevents premature multimerization of PulD and accompanies it through the periplasm to the outer membrane. PulD is the first bacterial outer membrane protein with demonstrated ability to insert efficiently into the inner membrane.     

Outer membrane targeting of secretin PulD protein relies on disordered domain recognition by a dedicated chaperone

Interaction of bacterial outer membrane secretin PulD with its dedicated lipoprotein chaperone PulS relies on a disorder-to-order transition of the chaperone binding (S) domain near the PulD C terminus. PulS interacts with purified S domain to form a 1:1 complex. Circular dichroism, one-dimensional NMR, and hydrodynamic measurements indicate that the S domain is elongated and intrinsically disordered but gains secondary structure upon binding to PulS. Limited proteolysis and mass spectrometry identified the 28 C-terminal residues of the S domain as a minimal binding site with low nanomolar affinity for PulS in vitro that is sufficient for outer membrane targeting of PulD in vivo. The region upstream of this binding site is not required for targeting or multimerization and does not interact with PulS, but it is required for secretin function in type II secretion. Although other secretin chaperones differ substantially from PulS in sequence and secondary structure, they have all adopted at least superficially similar mechanisms of interaction with their cognate secretins, suggesting that intrinsically disordered regions facilitate rapid interaction between secretins and their chaperones.     

The secretin-specific, chaperone-like protein of the general secretory pathway: separation of proteolytic protection and piloting functions

The chaperone-like protein of the main terminal branch of the general secretory pathway from Klebsiella oxytoca , the outer membrane lipoprotein PulS, protects the multimeric secretin PulD from degradation and promotes its correct localization to the outer membrane. To determine whether these are separable functions, or whether resistance to proteolysis results simply from correct localization of PulD, we replaced the lipoprotein-type signal peptide of PulS by the signal peptide of periplasmic maltose-binding protein. The resulting periplasmic PulS retained its ability to protect PulD, but not its ability to localize PulD to the outer membrane and to function in pullulanase secretion. Periplasmic PulS competed with wild-type PulS to prevent pullulanase secretion, presumably again by causing mislocalization of PulD. A hybrid protein comprising the mature part of PulS fused to the C-terminus of full-length maltose-binding protein (MalE–PulS) had similar properties to the periplasmic PulS protein. Moreover, MalE–PulS was shown to associate with PulD by amylose-affinity chromatography. The MalE–PulS hybrid was rendered completely functional (i.e. it restored pullulanase secretion in a pulS mutant) by replacing its signal peptide with a lipoprotein-type signal peptide. However, this fatty-acylated hybrid protein was only functional if it also carried a lipoprotein sorting signal that targeted it to the outer membrane. Thus, the two functions of PulS are separate and fully dissociable. Incorrect localization, rather than proteolysis, of PulD in the absence of PulS was shown to be the factor that causes high-level induction of the phage shock response. The Erwinia chrysanthemi PulS homologue, OutS, can substitute for PulS, and PulS can protect the secretin OutD from proteolysis in Escherichia coli , indicating the possible existence of a family of PulS-like chaperone proteins.     

The C-terminal domain of the secretin PulD contains the binding site for its cognate chaperone, PulS, and confers PulS dependence on pIVf1 function

Related outer membrane proteins, termed secretins, participate in the secretion of macromolecules across the outer membrane of many Gram-negative bacteria. In the pullulanase-secretion system, PulS, an outer membrane-associated lipoprotein, is required both for the integrity and the proper outer membrane localization of the PulD secretin. Here we show that the PulS-binding site is located within the C-terminal 65 residues of PulD. Addition of this domain to the filamentous phage secretin, pIV, or to the unrelated maltose-binding protein rendered both proteins dependent on PulS for stability. A chimeric protein composed of bacteriophage f1 pIV and the C-terminal domain of PulD required properly localized PulS to support phage assembly. An in vivo complex formed between the pIV-PulD₆₅ chimera and PulS was detected by co-immunoprecipitation and by affinity chromatography.     

Type II secretion system secretin PulD localizes in clusters in the Escherichia coli outer membrane

The cellular localization of a chimera formed by fusing a monomeric red fluorescent protein to the C terminus of the Klebsiella oxytoca type II secretion system outer membrane secretin PulD (PulD-mCherry) in Escherichia coli was determined in vivo by fluorescence microscopy. Like PulD, PulD-mCherry formed sodium dodecyl sulfate- and heat-resistant multimers and was functional in pullulanase secretion. Chromosome-encoded PulD-mCherry formed fluorescent foci on the periphery of the cell in the presence of high (plasmid-encoded) levels of its cognate chaperone, the pilotin PulS. Subcellular fractionation demonstrated that the chimera was located exclusively in the outer membrane under these circumstances. A similar localization pattern was observed by fluorescence microscopy of fixed cells treated with green fluorescent protein-tagged affitin, which binds with high affinity to an epitope in the N-terminal region of PulD. At lower levels of (chromosome-encoded) PulS, PulD-mCherry was less stable, was located mainly in the inner membrane, from which it could not be solubilized with urea, and did not induce the phage shock response, unlike PulD in the absence of PulS. The fluorescence pattern of PulD-mCherry under these conditions was similar to that observed when PulS levels were high. The complete absence of PulS caused the appearance of bright and almost exclusively polar fluorescent foci.     

Pilotin-secretin recognition in the type II secretion system of Klebsiella oxytoca

A crucial aspect of the functionality of bacterial type II secretion systems is the targeting and assembly of the outer membrane secretin. In the Klebsiella oxytoca type II secretion system, the lipoprotein PulS, a pilotin, targets secretin PulD monomers through the periplasm to the outer membrane. We present the crystal structure of PulS, an all-helical bundle that is structurally distinct from proteins with similar functions. Replacement of valine at position 42 in a charged groove of PulS abolished complex formation between a non-lipidated variant of PulS and a peptide corresponding to the unfolded region of PulD to which PulS binds (the S-domain), in vitro, as well as PulS function in vivo. Substitutions of other residues in the groove also diminished the interaction with the S-domain in vitro but exerted less marked effects in vivo. We propose that the interaction between PulS and the S-domain is maintained through a structural adaptation of the two proteins that could be influenced by cis factors such as the fatty acyl groups on PulS, as well as periplasmic trans-acting factors, which represents a possible paradigm for chaperone-target protein interactions.     

Insertion of an outer membrane protein in Escherichia coli requires a chaperone-like protein.

Only one of the characterized components of the main terminal branch of the general secretory pathway (GSP) in Gram-negative bacteria, GspD, is an integral outer membrane protein that could conceivably form a channel to permit protein transport across this membrane. PulD, a member of the GspD protein family required for pullulanase secretion by Klebsiella oxytoca, is shown here to form outer membrane-associated complexes which are not readily dissociated by SDS treatment. The outer membrane association of PulD is absolutely dependent on another component of the GSP, the outer membrane-anchored lipoprotein PulS. Furthermore, the absence of PulS resulted in limited proteolysis of PulD and caused induction of the so-called phage shock response, as measured by increased expression of the pspA gene. We propose that PulS may be the first member of a new family of periplasmic chaperones that are specifically required for the insertion of a group of outer membrane proteins into this membrane. PulS is only the second component of the main terminal branch of the GSP for which a precise function can be proposed.     

Mutant of LolA, a lipoprotein-specific molecular chaperone of Escherichia coli, defective in the transfer of lipoproteins to LolB

The outer membrane-specific lipoproteins of Escherichia coli are released from the inner membrane as a water-soluble complex with LolA and then transferred to the outer membrane receptor, LolB. LolA thus plays a critical role in the sorting and outer membrane localization of lipoproteins. To dissect the LolA function, the highly conserved residues were subjected to random mutagenesis, followed by selection for a growth defect. LolA(R43L), one of mutants thus constructed, possessed Leu in place of Arg at position 43 and caused accumulation of the LolA(R43L)-lipoprotein complex in the periplasm. LolA(R43L) was as active as wild-type LolA as to the release of lipoproteins from spheroplasts. In marked contrast, the transfer of lipoproteins from LolA(R43L) to LolB was completely inhibited, indicating that Arg at position 43 of LolA is involved in the lipoprotein transfer reaction.     

Large-scale preparation of the homogeneous LolA lipoprotein complex and efficient in vitro transfer of lipoproteins to the outer membrane in a LolB-dependent manner

An ATP-binding cassette transporter LolCDE complex of Escherichia coli releases lipoproteins destined to the outer membrane from the inner membrane as a complex with a periplasmic chaperone, LolA. Interaction of the LolA-lipoprotein complex with an outer membrane receptor, LolB, then causes localization of lipoproteins to the outer membrane. As far as examined, formation of the LolA-lipoprotein complex strictly depends on ATP hydrolysis by the LolCDE complex in the presence of LolA. It has been speculated, based on crystallographic and biochemical observations, that LolA undergoes an ATP-dependent conformational change upon lipoprotein binding. Thus, preparation of a large amount of the LolA-lipoprotein complex is difficult. Moreover, lipoproteins bound to LolA are heterogeneous. We report here that the coexpression of LolA and outer membrane-specific lipoprotein Pal from a very efficient plasmid causes the unusual accumulation of the LolA-Pal complex in the periplasm. The complex was purified to homogeneity and shown to be a functional intermediate of the lipoprotein localization pathway. In vitro incorporation of Pal into outer membranes revealed that a single molecule of LolB catalyzes the incorporation of more than 100 molecules of Pal into outer membranes. Moreover, the LolB-dependent incorporation of Pal was not affected by excess-free LolA, indicating that LolB specifically interacts with liganded LolA. Finally, the LolB depletion caused the accumulation of a significant amount of Pal in the periplasm, thereby establishing the conditions for preparation of the homogeneous LolA-lipoprotein complex.     

Domain structure of secretin PulD revealed by limited proteolysis and electron microscopy

Secretins, a superfamily of multimeric outer membrane proteins, mediate the transport of large macromolecules across the outer membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. Limited proteolysis of secretin PulD from the Klebsiella oxytoca pullulanase secretion pathway showed that it consists of an N-terminal domain and a protease-resistant C-terminal domain that remains multimeric after proteolysis. The stable C-terminal domain starts just before the region in PulD that is highly conserved in the secretin superfamily and apparently lacks the region at the C-terminal end to which the secretin-specific pilot protein PulS binds. Electron microscopy showed that the stable fragment produced by proteolysis is composed of two stacked rings that encircle a central channel and that it lacks the peripheral radial spokes that are seen in the native complex. Moreover, the electron microscopic images suggest that the N-terminal domain folds back into the large cavity of the channel that is formed by the C-terminal domain of the native complex, thereby occluding the channel, consistent with previous electrophysiological studies showing that the channel is normally closed.     

Roles of the hydrophobic cavity and lid of LolA in the lipoprotein transfer reaction in Escherichia coli

LolA, a periplasmic chaperone, binds to outer membrane-specific lipoproteins released from the inner membrane through the action of an ATP-binding cassette transporter, LolCDE and then transfers them to the outer membrane receptor LolB, thereby mediating the inner to outer membrane transport of lipoproteins. The crystal structure of free LolA revealed that it has an internal hydrophobic cavity, which is surrounded by hydrophobic residues and closed by a lid comprising alpha-helices. The hydrophobic cavity most likely represents the binding site for the lipid moiety of a lipoprotein. It is speculated that the lid undergoes opening and closing upon the binding and transfer of lipoproteins, respectively. To determine the functions of the hydrophobic cavity and lid in detail, 14 residues involved in the formation of these structures were subjected to random mutagenesis. Among the obtained 21 LolA derivatives that did not support growth, 14 were active as to the binding of lipoproteins but defective in the transfer of lipoproteins to LolB, causing the periplasmic accumulation of a lipoprotein as a complex with a LolA derivative. A LolA derivative, I93G, bound lipoproteins faster than wild-type LolA did, whereas it did not transfer associated lipoproteins to LolB. When I93G and wild type LolA co-existed, lipoproteins were bound only to I93G; which therefore exhibited a dominant negative property. Another derivative, L59R, was also defective in the transfer of lipoproteins to LolB but did not exhibit a dominant negative property. Taken together, these results indicate that both the hydrophobic cavity and the lid are critically important for not only the binding of lipoproteins but also their transfer.     

Opening and closing of the hydrophobic cavity of LolA coupled to lipoprotein binding and release

Outer membrane-specific lipoproteins of Escherichia coli are released from the inner membrane through the action of Lol-CDE, which leads to the formation of a complex between the lipoprotein and LolA, a periplasmic chaperone. LolA then transfers lipoproteins to LolB, a receptor in the outer membrane. The structures of LolA and LolB are very similar, having an incomplete beta-barrel covered with an alpha-helical lid forming a hydrophobic cavity inside. The cavity of LolA, but not that of LolB, is closed and thus inaccessible to the bulk solvent. Previous studies suggested that Arg at position 43 of LolA is critical for maintaining this closed structure. We show here, through a crystallographic study, that the cavity of the LolA(R43L) mutant, in which Leu replaces Arg-43, is indeed open to the external milieu. We then found that the binding of a fluorescence probe distinguishes the open/close state of the cavity. Furthermore, it was revealed that the hydrophobic cavity of LolA opens upon the binding of lipoproteins. Such a liganded LolA was found to be inactive in the release of lipoproteins from the inner membrane. On the other hand, the liganded LolA became fully functional when lipoproteins were removed from LolA by detergent treatment or transferred to LolB. Free LolA thus formed was inaccessible to a fluorescence probe. These results, taken together, reveal the LolA cycle, in which the hydrophobic cavity undergoes opening and closing upon the binding and release of lipoproteins, respectively.     

Crystal structures of bacterial lipoprotein localization factors,LolA and LolB

Lipoproteins having a lipid-modified cysteine at the N-terminus are localized on either the inner or the outer membrane of Escherichia coli depending on the residue at position 2. Five Lol proteins involved in the sorting and membrane localization of lipoprotein are highly conserved in Gram-negative bacteria. We determined the crystal structures of a periplasmic chaperone, LolA, and an outer membrane lipoprotein receptor, LolB. Despite their dissimilar amino acid sequences, the structures of LolA and LolB are strikingly similar to each other. Both have a hydrophobic cavity consisting of an unclosed beta barrel and an alpha-helical lid. The cavity represents a possible binding site for the lipid moiety of lipoproteins. Detailed structural differences between the two proteins provide significant insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying the energy-independent transfer of lipoproteins from LolA to LolB and from LolB to the outer membrane. Furthermore, the structures of both LolA and LolB determined from different crystal forms revealed the distinct structural dynamics regarding the association and dissociation of lipoproteins. The results are discussed in the context of the current model for the lipoprotein transfer from the inner to the outer membrane through a hydrophilic environment.     

Dominant negative mutant of a lipoprotein-specific molecular chaperone,LolA, tightly associates with LolCDE

Periplasmic molecular chaperone LolA and the inner membrane ATP binding cassette transporter LolCDE are essential for ATP-dependent release of outer membrane-directed lipoproteins from the inner membrane of Escherichia coli. A LolA(F47E) mutant carrying a Phe to Glu mutation at position 47 was defective in the release of lipoproteins from spheroplasts and proteoliposomes reconstituted with LolCDE. When incubated with proteoliposomes containing LolCDE, LolA remained in the supernatant whereas LolA(F47E) bound to proteoliposomes. This tight association of LolA(F47E) with LolCDE caused a dominant negative phenotype in vivo, suggesting that the LolA-LolCDE interaction is critical for lipoprotein release.     

Molecular events involved in a single cycle of ligand transfer from an ATP binding cassette transporter, LolCDE, to a molecular chaperone, LolA

An ATP binding cassette transporter LolCDE complex releases lipoproteins from the inner membrane of Escherichia coli in an ATP-dependent manner, leading to the formation of a complex between a lipoprotein and a periplasmic chaperone, LolA. LolA is proposed to undergo a conformational change upon the lipoprotein binding. The lipoprotein is then transferred from the LolA-lipoprotein complex to the outer membrane via LolB. Unlike most ATP binding cassette transporters mediating the transmembrane flux of substrates, the LolCDE complex catalyzes the extrusion of lipoproteins anchored to the outer leaflet of the inner membrane. Moreover, the LolCDE complex is unique in that it can be purified as a liganded form, which is an intermediate of the lipoprotein release reaction. Taking advantage of these unique properties, we established an assay system that enabled the analysis of a single cycle of lipoprotein transfer reaction from liganded LolCDE to LolA in a detergent solution. The LolA-lipoprotein complex thus formed was physiologically functional and delivered lipoproteins to the outer membrane in a LolB-dependent manner. Vanadate, a potent inhibitor of the lipoprotein release from proteoliposomes, was found to inhibit the release of ADP from LolCDE. However, a single cycle of lipoprotein transfer occurred from vanadate-treated LolCDE to LolA, indicating that vanadate traps LolCDE at the energized state.     

A mutation in the membrane subunit of an ABC transporter LolCDE complex causing outer membrane localization of lipoproteins against their inner membrane-specific signals

Lipoproteins in Gram-negative bacteria are anchored to the inner or outer membrane via fatty acids attached to the N-terminal cysteine. The residue at position 2 determines the membrane specificity. An ATP binding cassette transporter LolCDE complex releases lipoproteins with residues other than aspartate at position 2 from the inner membrane, whereas those with aspartate at position 2 are rejected by LolCDE and therefore remain in the inner membrane. For further understanding of this rejection mechanism, a novel strategy was developed to select mutants in which lipoproteins with aspartate at position 2 are released. The isolated mutants carried an alanine to proline mutation at position 40 of LolC, a membrane subunit of the LolCDE complex. A significant portion of an inner membrane lipoprotein, L10P(DQ), was localized to the outer membrane when the LolC mutant was expressed. Periplasmic chaperone LolA formed a complex with the released L10P(DQ), which was subsequently incorporated into the outer membrane in a LolB-dependent manner, indicating that neither LolA nor LolB rejects lipoproteins with aspartate at position 2. The amount of the LolC mutant co-purified with LolD and LolE after membrane solubilization was reduced significantly. Taken together, these results indicate that the mutation causes destabilization of the LolCDE complex and concomitantly prevents the accurate recognition of lipoprotein-sorting signals.     

Characterization of the LolA-LolB system as the general lipoprotein localization mechanism of Escherichia coli.

The major outer membrane lipoprotein (Lpp) of Escherichia coli requires LolA for its release from the cytoplasmic membrane, and LolB for its localization to the outer membrane. We examined the significance of the LolA-LolB system as to the outer membrane localization of other lipoproteins. All lipoproteins possessing an outer membrane-directed signal at the N-terminal second position were efficiently released from the inner membrane in the presence of LolA. Some lipoproteins were released in the absence of externally added LolA, albeit at a slower rate and to a lesser extent. This LolA-independent release was also strictly dependent on the outer membrane sorting signal. A lipoprotein-LolA complex was formed when the release took place in the presence of LolA, whereas lipoproteins released in the absence of LolA existed as heterogeneous complexes, suggesting that the release and the formation of a complex with LolA are distinct events. The release of LolB, an outer membrane lipoprotein functioning as the receptor for a lipoprotein-LolA complex, occurred with a trace amount of LolA, and therefore was extremely efficient. The LolA-dependent release of lipoproteins was found to be crucial for the specific incorporation of lipoproteins into the outer membrane, whereas lipoproteins released in the absence of LolA were nonspecifically and inefficiently incorporated into the membrane. The outer membrane incorporation of lipoproteins including LolB per se was dependent on LolB in the outer membrane. From these results, we conclude that lipoproteins in E. coli generally utilize the LolA-LolB system for efficient release from the inner membrane and specific localization to the outer membrane.     

Mechanisms underlying energy-independent transfer of lipoproteins from LolA to LolB, which have similar unclosed {beta}-barrel structures

The Lol system, comprising five Lol proteins, transfers lipoproteins from the inner to the outer membrane of Escherichia coli. Periplasmic LolA accepts lipoproteins from LolCDE in the inner membrane and immediately transfers them to LolB, a receptor anchored to the outer membrane. The unclosed beta-barrel structures of LolA and LolB are very similar to each other and form hydrophobic cavities for lipoproteins. The lipoprotein transfer between these similar structures is unidirectional and very efficient, but requires no energy input. To reveal the mechanisms underlying this lipoprotein transfer, Arg and Phe at positions 43 and 47, respectively, of LolA were systematically mutagenized. The two residues were previously found to affect abilities to accept and transfer lipoproteins. Substitution of Phe-47 with polar residues inhibited the ability to accept lipoproteins from the inner membrane. No derivatives caused periplasmic accumulation of lipoproteins. In contrast, many Arg-43 derivatives caused unusual periplasmic accumulation of lipoproteins to various extents. However, all derivatives, except one having Leu instead of Arg, supported the growth of cells. All Arg-43 derivatives retained the ability to accept lipoproteins from the inner membrane, whereas their abilities to transfer associated lipoproteins to LolB were variously reduced. Assessment of the intensity of the hydrophobic interaction between lipoproteins and Arg-43 derivatives revealed that the LolA-lipoprotein interaction should be weak, otherwise lipoprotein transfer to LolB is inhibited, causing accumulation of lipoproteins in the periplasm.