Cleavage of dsRNAs hyper-edited by ADARs occurs at preferred editing sites

Long double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) may undergo covalent modification (hyper-editing) by adenosine deaminases that act on RNA (ADARs), whereby up to 50–60% of adenosine residues are converted to inosine. Previously, we have described a ribonuclease activity in various cell extracts that specifically targets dsRNAs hyper-edited by ADARs. Such a ribonuclease may play an important role in viral defense, or may alternatively be involved in down-regulation of other RNA duplexes. Cleavage of hyper-edited dsRNA occurs within sequences containing multiple IU pairs but not in duplexes that contain either isosteric GU pairs or Watson–Crick base pairs. Here, we describe experiments aimed at further characterizing cleavage of hyper-edited dsRNA. Using various inosine-containing dsRNAs we show that cleavage occurs preferentially at a site containing both IU and UI pairs, and that inclusion of even a single GU pair inhibits cleavage. We also show that cleavage occurs on both strands within a single dsRNA molecule and requires a 2′-OH group. Strikingly, we show that ADAR1, ADAR2 or dADAR all preferentially generate the preferred cleavage site when hyper-editing a long dsRNA.     

The RISC subunit Tudor-SN binds to hyper-edited double-stranded RNA and promotes its cleavage

Long perfect double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) molecules play a role in various cellular pathways. dsRNA may undergo extensive covalent modification (hyper-editing) by adenosine deaminases that act on RNA (ADARs), resulting in conversion of up to 50% of adenosine residues to inosine (I). Alternatively, dsRNA may trigger RNA interference (RNAi), resulting in silencing of the cognate mRNA. These two pathways have previously been shown to be antagonistic. We show a novel interaction between components of the ADAR and RNAi pathways. Tudor staphylococcal nuclease (Tudor-SN) is a subunit of the RNA-induced silencing complex, which is central to the mechanism of RNAi. Here we show that Tudor-SN specifically interacts with and promotes cleavage of model hyper-edited dsRNA substrates containing multiple I.U and U.I pairs. This interaction suggests a novel unsuspected interplay between the two pathways that is more complex than mutual antagonism.     

RNAi is antagonized by A→I hyper-editing

RNA interference (RNAi) and adenosine to inosine conversion are both mechanisms that respond to double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) and have been suggested to have antiviral roles. RNAi involves processing of dsRNA to short interfering RNAs (siRNAs), which subsequently mediate degradation of the cognate mRNAs. Deamination of adenosines changes the coding capacity of the RNA, as inosine is decoded as guanosine, and alters the structure because A–U base pairs are replaced by I•U wobble pairs. Here we show that RNAi is inhibited if the triggering dsRNA is first deaminated by ADAR2. Moreover, we show that production of siRNAs is progressively inhibited with increasing deamination and that this is sufficient to explain the inhibition of RNAi upon hyper-editing of dsRNAs.     

Molecular dynamics simulations and free energy calculations of base flipping in dsRNA

The family of adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs) targets adenosines in RNA that is mainly double stranded. Some substrates are promiscuously deaminated whereas others, such as the mammalian glutamate receptor B (gluR-B) pre-mRNA, are more selectively deaminated. Many DNA/RNA-base modification enzymes use a base flipping mechanism to be able to reach their target base and it is believed that ADARs function in a similar way. In this study we used molecular dynamics (MD) simulations to describe two sites on the gluR-B pre-mRNA, the selectively targeted R/G site and the nontargeted 46 site, in an attempt to explain the substrate specificity. We used regular MD and also a forced base flipping method with umbrella sampling to calculate the free energy of base opening. Spontaneous opening of the mismatched adenosine was observed for the R/G site but not for the 46 site.     

Inosine-containing dsRNA binds a stress-granule-like complex and downregulates gene expression in trans

Long double-stranded RNAs (dsRNAs) may undergo extensive modification (hyperediting) by adenosine deaminases that act on RNA (ADARs), where up to 50% of adenosine (A) residues are changed to inosine (I). Traditionally, consequences of A-to-I editing were thought to be limited to modified RNA itself. We show here, however, that hyperedited dsRNA (I-dsRNA) is able to downregulate gene expression in trans. Furthermore, we show that both endogenous expression and reporter gene expression were substantially reduced in the presence of I-dsRNA. This was due to a reduction in reporter mRNA levels and also translation inhibition. Importantly, we show that I-dsRNA interferes with translation initiation. We also show that I-dsRNA specifically binds a stress-granule-like complex. Stress granules (SGs) are important for translational silencing during stress. Finally, we propose a model whereby editing by ADARs results in downregulation of gene expression via SG formation.     

Modulation of microRNA processing and expression through RNA editing by ADAR deaminases

Adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs) are involved in editing of adenosine residues to inosine in double-stranded RNA (dsRNA). Although this editing recodes and alters functions of several mammalian genes, its most common targets are noncoding repeat sequences, indicating the involvement of this editing system in currently unknown functions other than recoding of protein sequences. Here we show that specific adenosine residues of certain microRNA (miRNA) precursors are edited by ADAR1 and ADAR2. Editing of pri-miR-142, the precursor of miRNA-142, expressed in hematopoietic tissues, resulted in suppression of its processing by Drosha. The edited pri-miR-142 was degraded by Tudor-SN, a component of RISC and also a ribonuclease specific to inosine-containing dsRNAs. Consequently, mature miRNA-142 expression levels increased substantially in ADAR1 null or ADAR2 null mice. Our results demonstrate a new function of RNA editing in the control of miRNA biogenesis.     

Movement protein Pns6 of rice dwarf phytoreovirus has both ATPase and RNA binding activities

Cell-to-cell movement is essential for plant viruses to systemically infect host plants. Plant viruses encode movement proteins (MP) to facilitate such movement. Unlike the well-characterized MPs of DNA viruses and single-stranded RNA (ssRNA) viruses, knowledge of the functional mechanisms of MPs encoded by double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) viruses is very limited. In particular, many studied MPs of DNA and ssRNA viruses bind non-specifically ssRNAs, leading to models in which ribonucleoprotein complexes (RNPs) move from cell to cell. Thus, it will be of special interest to determine whether MPs of dsRNA viruses interact with genomic dsRNAs or their derivative sRNAs. To this end, we studied the biochemical functions of MP Pns6 of Rice dwarf phytoreovirus (RDV), a member of Phytoreovirus that contains a 12-segmented dsRNA genome. We report here that Pns6 binds both dsRNAs and ssRNAs. Intriguingly, Pns6 exhibits non-sequence specificity for dsRNA but shows preference for ssRNA sequences derived from the conserved genomic 5'- and 3'-terminal consensus sequences of RDV. Furthermore, Pns6 exhibits magnesium-dependent ATPase activities. Mutagenesis identified the RNA binding and ATPase activity sites of Pns6 at the N- and C-termini, respectively. Our results uncovered the novel property of a viral MP in differentially recognizing dsRNA and ssRNA and establish a biochemical basis to enable further studies on the mechanisms of dsRNA viral MP functions.     

Double-stranded RNA adenosine deaminases ADAR1 and ADAR2 have overlapping specificities

Adenosine deaminases that act on RNA (ADARs) deaminate adenosines to produce inosines within RNAs that are largely double-stranded (ds). Like most dsRNA binding proteins, the enzymes will bind to any dsRNA without apparent sequence specificity. However, once bound, ADARs deaminate certain adenosines more efficiently than others. Most of what is known about the intrinsic deamination specificity of ADARs derives from analyses of Xenopus ADAR1. In addition to ADAR1, mammalian cells have a second ADAR, named ADAR2; the deamination specificity of this enzyme has not been rigorously studied. Here we directly compare the specificity of human ADAR1 and ADAR2. We find that, like ADAR1, ADAR2 has a 5' neighbor preference (A approximately U > C = G), but, unlike ADAR1, also has a 3' neighbor preference (U = G > C = A). Simultaneous analysis of both neighbor preferences reveals that ADAR2 prefers certain trinucleotide sequences (UAU, AAG, UAG, AAU). In addition to characterizing ADAR2 preferences, we analyzed the fraction of adenosines deaminated in a given RNA at complete reaction, or the enzyme's selectivity. We find that ADAR1 and ADAR2 deaminate a given RNA with the same selectivity, and this appears to be dictated by features of the RNA substrate. Finally, we observed that Xenopus and human ADAR1 deaminate the same adenosines on all RNAs tested, emphasizing the similarity of ADAR1 in these two species. Our data add substantially to the understanding of ADAR2 specificity, and aid in efforts to predict which ADAR deaminates a given editing site adenosine in vivo.     

Evidence of Aberrant Immune Response by Endogenous Double‐Stranded RNAs: Attack from Within

Many innate immune response proteins recognize foreign nucleic acids from invading pathogens to initiate antiviral signaling. These proteins mostly rely on structural characteristics of the nucleic acids rather than their specific sequences to distinguish self and nonself. One feature utilized by RNA sensors is the extended stretch of double‐stranded RNA (dsRNA) base pairs. However, the criteria for recognizing nonself dsRNAs are rather lenient, and hairpin structure of self‐RNAs can also trigger an immune response. Consequently, aberrant activation of RNA sensors has been reported in numerous human diseases. Yet, in most cases, the activating antigens remain unknown. Recent studies have developed sequencing techniques tailored to specifically capture dsRNAs and identified that various noncoding elements in the nuclear and the mitochondrial genome can generate dsRNAs. Here, the identity of endogenous dsRNAs, their recognition by dsRNA sensors, and their implications in the pathogenesis of human diseases ranging from inflammatory to degenerative are presented.     

Base Composition and Hybridization Studies of the Three Double-Stranded RNA Segments of Bacteriophage φ6

The three double-stranded ribonucleic acid (dsRNA) segments of the bacteriophage phi6 were isolated and shown to have similar melting temperatures and base compositions. RNA:RNA hybridization experiments with the isolated segments eliminate the possibility that the two smaller dsRNA segments arise from a cleavage of the large dsRNA segment. The two smaller RNA segments reanneal rapidly even at low temperatures; in contrast, the large dsRNA reannealed only at higher temperatures. Evidence is also presented which suggests that the dsRNAs may contain a short single-stranded RNA tail.     

Uptake of Extracellular Double-Stranded RNA by SID-2

Ingested dsRNAs trigger RNA interference (RNAi) in many invertebrates, including the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Here we show that the C.?elegans apical intestinal membrane protein SID-2 is required in C.?elegans for the import of ingested dsRNA and that, when expressed in Drosophila S2 cells, SID-2 enables the uptake of dsRNAs. SID-2-dependent dsRNA transport requires an acidic extracellular environment and is selective for dsRNAs with at least 50 base pairs. Through structure-function analysis, we identify several SID-2 regions required for this activity, including three extracellular, positively charged histidines. Finally, we find that SID-2-dependent transport is inhibited by drugs that interfere with vesicle transport. Therefore, we propose that environmental dsRNAs are imported from the acidic intestinal lumen by SID-2 via endocytosis and are released from internalized vesicles in a secondary step mediated by the dsRNA channel SID-1. Similar multistep mechanisms may underlie the widespread observations of environmental RNAi.     

Coexpression of Escherichia coli RNase III in silkworm cells improves the efficiency of RNA interference induced by long hairpin dsRNAs

Abstract Long hairpin dsRNA transcribed from chromosomal DNA can induce RNA interference in Bombyx mori cells, although its gene silencing efficiency is lower than that of exogenously introduced double‐stranded RNAs (dsRNAs). To solve this problem, we monitored the nuclear cytoplasmic translocation of the transcribed hairpin dsRNA and analyzed the processing efficiency into mature small interfering RNA (siRNA). Northern blot analysis revealed that the transcribed hairpin dsRNAs were spliced and transported into the cytoplasm, but were not effectively diced into siRNAs. Interestingly, RNAi with hairpin dsRNAs from genome‐integrated IR transgene was stimulated by the coexpression of Escherichia coli RNase III, although this exogenous enzyme seemed to bring about nonspecific cleavage of cellular mRNA.     

Preferential selection of adenosines for modification by double-stranded RNA adenosine deaminase.

Double-stranded RNA adenosine deaminase (dsRAD), previously called the double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) unwinding/modifying activity, modifies adenosines to inosines within dsRNA. We used ribonuclease U2 and a mutant of ribonuclease T1 to map the sites of modification in several RNA duplexes. We found that dsRAD had a 5' neighbor preference (A = U > C > G) but no apparent 3' neighbor preference. Further, the proximity of the strand termini affected whether an adenosine was modified. Most importantly, dsRAD exhibited selectivity, modifying a minimal number of adenosines in short dsRNAs. Our results suggest that the specific editing of glutamate receptor subunit B mRNA could be performed in vivo by dsRAD without the aid of specificity factors, and support the hypothesis that dsRAD is responsible for hypermutations in certain RNA viruses.     

Arabidopsis thaliana endonuclease V is a ribonuclease specific for inosine-containing single-stranded RNA

Endonuclease V is highly conserved, both structurally and functionally, from bacteria to humans, and it cleaves the deoxyinosine-containing double-stranded DNA in Escherichia coli, whereas in Homo sapiens it catalyses the inosine-containing single-stranded RNA. Thus, deoxyinosine and inosine are unexpectedly produced by the deamination reactions of adenine in DNA and RNA, respectively. Moreover, adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing is carried out by adenosine deaminase acting on dsRNA (ADARs). We focused on Arabidopsis thaliana endonuclease V (AtEndoV) activity exhibiting variations in DNA or RNA substrate specificities. Since no ADAR was observed for A-to-I editing in A. thaliana, the possibility of inosine generation by A-to-I editing can be ruled out. Purified AtEndoV protein cleaved the second and third phosphodiester bonds, 3′ to inosine in single-strand RNA, at a low reaction temperature of 20–25°C, whereas the AtEndoV (Y100A) protein bearing a mutation in substrate recognition sites did not cleave these bonds. Furthermore, AtEndoV, similar to human EndoV, prefers RNA substrates over DNA substrates, and it could not cleave the inosine-containing double-stranded RNA. Thus, we propose the possibility that AtEndoV functions as an RNA substrate containing inosine induced by RNA damage, and not by A-to-I RNA editing in vivo.