High throughput proteome screening for biomarker detection

Mass spectrometry-based quantitative proteomics has become an important component of biological and clinical research. Current methods, while highly developed and powerful, are falling short of their goal of routinely analyzing whole proteomes mainly because the wealth of proteomic information accumulated from prior studies is not used for the planning or interpretation of present experiments. The consequence of this situation is that in every proteomic experiment the proteome is rediscovered. In this report we describe an approach for quantitative proteomics that builds on the extensive prior knowledge of proteomes and a platform for the implementation of the method. The method is based on the selection and chemical synthesis of isotopically labeled reference peptides that uniquely identify a particular protein and the addition of a panel of such peptides to the sample mixture consisting of tryptic peptides from the proteome in question. The platform consists of a peptide separation module for the generation of ordered peptide arrays from the combined peptide sample on the sample plate of a MALDI mass spectrometer, a high throughput MALDI-TOF/TOF mass spectrometer, and a suite of software tools for the selective analysis of the targeted peptides and the interpretation of the results. Applying the method to the analysis of the human blood serum proteome we demonstrate the feasibility of using mass spectrometry-based proteomics as a high throughput screening technology for the detection and quantification of targeted proteins in a complex system.     

Evaluation of strong cation exchange versus isoelectric focusing of peptides for multidimensional liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry

Shotgun proteome analysis platforms based on multidimensional liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) provide a powerful means to discover biomarker candidates in tissue specimens. Analysis platforms must balance sensitivity for peptide detection, reproducibility of detected peptide inventories and analytical throughput for protein amounts commonly present in tissue biospecimens (< 100 microg), such that platform stability is sufficient to detect modest changes in complex proteomes. We compared shotgun proteomics platforms by analyzing tryptic digests of whole cell and tissue proteomes using strong cation exchange (SCX) and isoelectric focusing (IEF) separations of peptides prior to LC-MS/MS analysis on a LTQ-Orbitrap hybrid instrument. IEF separations provided superior reproducibility and resolution for peptide fractionation from samples corresponding to both large (100 microg) and small (10 microg) protein inputs. SCX generated more peptide and protein identifications than did IEF with small (10 microg) samples, whereas the two platforms yielded similar numbers of identifications with large (100 microg) samples. In nine replicate analyses of tryptic peptides from 50 microg colon adenocarcinoma protein, overlap in protein detection by the two platforms was 77% of all proteins detected by both methods combined. IEF more quickly approached maximal detection, with 90% of IEF-detectable medium abundance proteins (those detected with a total of 3-4 peptides) detected within three replicate analyses. In contrast, the SCX platform required six replicates to detect 90% of SCX-detectable medium abundance proteins. High reproducibility and efficient resolution of IEF peptide separations make the IEF platform superior to the SCX platform for biomarker discovery via shotgun proteomic analyses of tissue specimens.     

Recent progress in liquid chromatography-based separation and label-free quantitative plant proteomics

Recent innovations in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based methods have facilitated quantitative and functional proteomic analyses of large numbers of proteins derived from complex samples without any need for protein or peptide labelling. Regardless of its great potential, the application of these proteomics techniques to plant science started only recently. Here we present an overview of label-free quantitative proteomics features and their employment for analysing plants. Recent methods used for quantitative protein analyses by MS techniques are summarized and major challenges associated with label-free LC-MS-based approaches, including sample preparation, peptide separation, quantification and kinetic studies, are discussed. Database search algorithms and specific aspects regarding protein identification of non-sequenced organisms are also addressed. So far, label-free LC-MS in plant science has been used to establish cellular or subcellular proteome maps, characterize plant-pathogen interactions or stress defence reactions, and for profiling protein patterns during developmental processes. Improvements in both, analytical platforms (separation technology and bioinformatics/statistical analysis) and high throughput nucleotide sequencing technologies will enhance the power of this method.     

A phase synchronization clustering algorithm for identifying interesting groups of genes from cell cycle expression data

Background

Quantitative proteomics holds great promise for identifying proteins that are differentially abundant between populations representing different physiological or disease states. A range of computational tools is now available for both isotopically labeled and label-free liquid chromatography mass spectrometry (LC-MS) based quantitative proteomics. However, they are generally not comparable to each other in terms of functionality, user interfaces, information input/output, and do not readily facilitate appropriate statistical data analysis. These limitations, along with the array of choices, present a daunting prospect for biologists, and other researchers not trained in bioinformatics, who wish to use LC-MS-based quantitative proteomics.

Results

We have developed Corra, a computational framework and tools for discovery-based LC-MS proteomics. Corra extends and adapts existing algorithms used for LC-MS-based proteomics, and statistical algorithms, originally developed for microarray data analyses, appropriate for LC-MS data analysis. Corra also adapts software engineering technologies (e.g. Google Web Toolkit, distributed processing) so that computationally intense data processing and statistical analyses can run on a remote server, while the user controls and manages the process from their own computer via a simple web interface. Corra also allows the user to output significantly differentially abundant LC-MS-detected peptide features in a form compatible with subsequent sequence identification via tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS). We present two case studies to illustrate the application of Corra to commonly performed LC-MS-based biological workflows: a pilot biomarker discovery study of glycoproteins isolated from human plasma samples relevant to type 2 diabetes, and a study in yeast to identify in vivo targets of the protein kinase Ark1 via phosphopeptide profiling.

Conclusion

The Corra computational framework leverages computational innovation to enable biologists or other researchers to process, analyze and visualize LC-MS data with what would otherwise be a complex and not user-friendly suite of tools. Corra enables appropriate statistical analyses, with controlled false-discovery rates, ultimately to inform subsequent targeted identification of differentially abundant peptides by MS/MS. For the user not trained in bioinformatics, Corra represents a complete, customizable, free and open source computational platform enabling LC-MS-based proteomic workflows, and as such, addresses an unmet need in the LC-MS proteomics field.     

HTAPP: High‐throughput autonomous proteomic pipeline

Recent advances in the speed and sensitivity of mass spectrometers and in analytical methods, the exponential acceleration of computer processing speeds, and the availability of genomic databases from an array of species and protein information databases have led to a deluge of proteomic data. The development of a lab‐based automated proteomic software platform for the automated collection, processing, storage, and visualization of expansive proteomic data sets is critically important. The high‐throughput autonomous proteomic pipeline described here is designed from the ground up to provide critically important flexibility for diverse proteomic workflows and to streamline the total analysis of a complex proteomic sample. This tool is composed of a software that controls the acquisition of mass spectral data along with automation of post‐acquisition tasks such as peptide quantification, clustered MS/MS spectral database searching, statistical validation, and data exploration within a user‐configurable lab‐based relational database. The software design of high‐throughput autonomous proteomic pipeline focuses on accommodating diverse workflows and providing missing software functionality to a wide range of proteomic researchers to accelerate the extraction of biological meaning from immense proteomic data sets. Although individual software modules in our integrated technology platform may have some similarities to existing tools, the true novelty of the approach described here is in the synergistic and flexible combination of these tools to provide an integrated and efficient analysis of proteomic samples.     

Comparative LC-MS: a landscape of peaks and valleys

Quantitative proteomics approaches using stable isotopes are well-known and used in many labs nowadays. More recently, high resolution quantitative approaches are reported that rely on LC-MS quantitation of peptide concentrations by comparing peak intensities between multiple runs obtained by continuous detection in MS mode. Characteristic of these comparative LC-MS procedures is that they do not rely on the use of stable isotopes; therefore the procedure is often referred to as label-free LC-MS. In order to compare at comprehensive scale peak intensity data in multiple LC-MS datasets, dedicated software is required for detection, matching and alignment of peaks. The high accuracy in quantitative determination of peptide abundance provides an impressive level of detail. This approach also requires an experimental set-up where quantitative aspects of protein extraction and reproducible separation conditions need to be well controlled. In this paper we will provide insight in the critical parameters that affect the quality of the results and list an overview of the most recent software packages that are available for this procedure.     

Design and analysis of quantitative differential proteomics investigations using LC-MS technology

Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS)-based proteomics is becoming an increasingly important tool in characterizing the abundance of proteins in biological samples of various types and across conditions. Effects of disease or drug treatments on protein abundance are of particular interest for the characterization of biological processes and the identification of biomarkers. Although state-of-the-art instrumentation is available to make high-quality measurements and commercially available software is available to process the data, the complexity of the technology and data presents challenges for bioinformaticians and statisticians. Here, we describe a pipeline for the analysis of quantitative LC-MS data. Key components of this pipeline include experimental design (sample pooling, blocking, and randomization) as well as deconvolution and alignment of mass chromatograms to generate a matrix of molecular abundance profiles. An important challenge in LC-MS-based quantitation is to be able to accurately identify and assign abundance measurements to members of protein families. To address this issue, we implement a novel statistical method for inferring the relative abundance of related members of protein families from tryptic peptide intensities. This pipeline has been used to analyze quantitative LC-MS data from multiple biomarker discovery projects. We illustrate our pipeline here with examples from two of these studies, and show that the pipeline constitutes a complete workable framework for LC-MS-based differential quantitation. Supplementary material is available at http://iec01.mie.utoronto.ca/~thodoros/Bukhman/.     

Quantitative profile of five murine core proteomes using label-free functional proteomics

Analysis of primary animal and human tissues is key in biological and biomedical research. Comparative proteomics analysis of primary biological material would benefit from uncomplicated experimental work flows capable of evaluating an unlimited number of samples. In this report we describe the application of label-free proteomics to the quantitative analysis of five mouse core proteomes. We developed a computer program and normalization procedures that allow exploitation of the quantitative data inherent in LC-MS/MS experiments for relative and absolute quantification of proteins in complex mixtures. Important features of this approach include (i) its ability to compare an unlimited number of samples, (ii) its applicability to primary tissues and cultured cells, (iii) its straightforward work flow without chemical reaction steps, and (iv) its usefulness not only for relative quantification but also for estimation of absolute protein abundance. We applied this approach to quantitatively characterize the most abundant proteins in murine brain, heart, kidney, liver, and lung. We matched 8,800 MS/MS peptide spectra to 1,500 proteins and generated 44,000 independent data points to profile the approximately 1,000 most abundant proteins in mouse tissues. This dataset provides a quantitative profile of the fundamental proteome of a mouse, identifies the major similarities and differences between organ-specific proteomes, and serves as a paradigm of how label-free quantitative MS can be used to characterize the phenotype of mammalian primary tissues at the molecular level.     

Performance Metrics for Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry Systems in Proteomics Analyses

A major unmet need in LC-MS/MS-based proteomics analyses is a set of tools for quantitative assessment of system performance and evaluation of technical variability. Here we describe 46 system performance metrics for monitoring chromatographic performance, electrospray source stability, MS1 and MS2 signals, dynamic sampling of ions for MS/MS, and peptide identification. Applied to data sets from replicate LC-MS/MS analyses, these metrics displayed consistent, reasonable responses to controlled perturbations. The metrics typically displayed variations less than 10% and thus can reveal even subtle differences in performance of system components. Analyses of data from interlaboratory studies conducted under a common standard operating procedure identified outlier data and provided clues to specific causes. Moreover, interlaboratory variation reflected by the metrics indicates which system components vary the most between laboratories. Application of these metrics enables rational, quantitative quality assessment for proteomics and other LC-MS/MS analytical applications.LC-MS/MS provides the most widely used technology platform for proteomics analyses of purified proteins, simple mixtures, and complex proteomes. In a typical analysis, protein mixtures are proteolytically digested, the peptide digest is fractionated, and the resulting peptide fractions then are analyzed by LC-MS/MS (1, 2). Database searches of the MS/MS spectra yield peptide identifications and, by inference and assembly, protein identifications. Depending on protein sample load and the extent of peptide fractionation used, LC-MS/MS analytical systems can generate from hundreds to thousands of peptide and protein identifications (3). Many variations of LC-MS/MS analytical platforms have been described, and the performance of these systems is influenced by a number of experimental design factors (4).Comparison of data sets obtained by LC-MS/MS analyses provides a means to evaluate the proteomic basis for biologically significant states or phenotypes. For example, data-dependent LC-MS/MS analyses of tumor and normal tissues enabled unbiased discovery of proteins whose expression is enhanced in cancer (5–7). Comparison of data-dependent LC-MS/MS data sets from phosphotyrosine peptides in drug-responsive and -resistant cell lines identified differentially regulated phosphoprotein signaling networks (8, 9). Similarly, activity-based probes and data-dependent LC-MS/MS analysis were used to identify differentially regulated enzymes in normal and tumor tissues (10). All of these approaches assume that the observed differences reflect differences in the proteomic composition of the samples analyzed rather than analytical system variability. The validity of this assumption is difficult to assess because of a lack of objective criteria to assess analytical system performance.The problem of variability poses three practical questions for analysts using LC-MS/MS proteomics platforms. First, is the analytical system performing optimally for the reproducible analysis of complex proteomes? Second, can the sources of suboptimal performance and variability be identified, and can the impact of changes or improvements be evaluated? Third, can system performance metrics provide documentation to support the assessment of proteomic differences between biologically interesting samples?Currently, the most commonly used measure of variability in LC-MS/MS proteomics analyses is the number of confident peptide identifications (11–13). Although consistency in numbers of identifications may indicate repeatability, the numbers do not indicate whether system performance is optimal or which components require optimization. One well characterized source of variability in peptide identifications is the automated sampling of peptide ion signals for acquisition of MS/MS spectra by instrument control software, which results in stochastic sampling of lower abundance peptides (14). Variability certainly also arises from sample preparation methods (e.g. protein extraction and digestion). A largely unexplored source of variability is the performance of the core LC-MS/MS analytical system, which includes the LC system, the MS instrument, and system software. The configuration, tuning, and operation of these system components govern sample injection, chromatography, electrospray ionization, MS signal detection, and sampling for MS/MS analysis. These characteristics all are subject to manipulation by the operator and thus provide means to optimize system performance.Here we describe the development of 46 metrics for evaluating the performance of LC-MS/MS system components. We have implemented a freely available software pipeline that generates these metrics directly from LC-MS/MS data files. We demonstrate their use in characterizing sources of variability in proteomics platforms, both for replicate analyses on a single instrument and in the context of large interlaboratory studies conducted by the National Cancer Institute-supported Clinical Proteomic Technology Assessment for Cancer (CPTAC)1 Network.     

EBP, a program for protein identification using multiple tandem mass spectrometry datasets

MS/MS combined with database search methods can identify the proteins present in complex mixtures. High throughput methods that infer probable peptide sequences from enzymatically digested protein samples create a challenge in how best to aggregate the evidence for candidate proteins. Typically the results of multiple technical and/or biological replicate experiments must be combined to maximize sensitivity. We present a statistical method for estimating probabilities of protein expression that integrates peptide sequence identifications from multiple search algorithms and replicate experimental runs. The method was applied to create a repository of 797 non-homologous zebrafish (Danio rerio) proteins, at an empirically validated false identification rate under 1%, as a resource for the development of targeted quantitative proteomics assays. We have implemented this statistical method as an analytic module that can be integrated with an existing suite of open-source proteomics software.     

Increased Power for the Analysis of Label-free LC-MS/MS Proteomics Data by Combining Spectral Counts and Peptide Peak Attributes

Liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)-based proteomics provides a wealth of information about proteins present in biological samples. In bottom-up LC-MS/MS-based proteomics, proteins are enzymatically digested into peptides prior to query by LC-MS/MS. Thus, the information directly available from the LC-MS/MS data is at the peptide level. If a protein-level analysis is desired, the peptide-level information must be rolled up into protein-level information. We propose a principal component analysis-based statistical method, ProPCA, for efficiently estimating relative protein abundance from bottom-up label-free LC-MS/MS data that incorporates both spectral count information and LC-MS peptide ion peak attributes, such as peak area, volume, or height. ProPCA may be used effectively with a variety of quantification platforms and is easily implemented. We show that ProPCA outperformed existing quantitative methods for peptide-protein roll-up, including spectral counting methods and other methods for combining LC-MS peptide peak attributes. The performance of ProPCA was validated using a data set derived from the LC-MS/MS analysis of a mixture of protein standards (the UPS2 proteomic dynamic range standard introduced by The Association of Biomolecular Resource Facilities Proteomics Standards Research Group in 2006). Finally, we applied ProPCA to a comparative LC-MS/MS analysis of digested total cell lysates prepared for LC-MS/MS analysis by alternative lysis methods and show that ProPCA identified more differentially abundant proteins than competing methods.One of the fundamental goals of proteomics methods for the biological sciences is to identify and quantify all proteins present in a sample. LC-MS/MS-based proteomics methodologies offer a promising approach to this problem (1–3). These methodologies allow for the acquisition of a vast amount of information about the proteins present in a sample. However, extracting reliable protein abundance information from LC-MS/MS data remains challenging. In this work, we were primarily concerned with the analysis of data acquired using bottom-up label-free LC-MS/MS-based proteomics techniques where “bottom-up” refers to the fact that proteins are enzymatically digested into peptides prior to query by the LC-MS/MS instrument platform (4), and “label-free” indicates that analyses are performed without the aid of stable isotope labels. One challenge inherent in the bottom-up approach to proteomics is that information directly available from the LC-MS/MS data is at the peptide level. When a protein-level analysis is desired, as is often the case with discovery-driven LC-MS research, peptide-level information must be rolled up into protein-level information.Spectral counting (5–10) is a straightforward and widely used example of peptide-protein roll-up for LC-MS/MS data. Information experimentally acquired in single stage (MS) and tandem (MS/MS) spectra may lead to the assignment of MS/MS spectra to peptide sequences in a database-driven or database-free manner using various peptide identification software platforms (SEQUEST (11) and Mascot (12), for instance); the identified peptide sequences correspond, in turn, to proteins. In principle, the number of tandem spectra matched to peptides corresponding to a certain protein, the spectral count (SC),1 is positively associated with the abundance of a protein (5). In spectral counting techniques, raw or normalized SCs are used as a surrogate for protein abundance. Spectral counting methods have been moderately successful in quantifying protein abundance and identifying significant proteins in various settings. However, SC-based methods do not make full use of information available from peaks in the LC-MS domain, and this surely leads to loss of efficiency.Peaks in the LC-MS domain corresponding to peptide ion species are highly sensitive to differences in protein abundance (13, 14). Identifying LC-MS peaks that correspond to detected peptides and measuring quantitative attributes of these peaks (such as height, area, or volume) offers a promising alternative to spectral counting methods. These methods have become especially popular in applications using stable isotope labeling (15). However, challenges remain, especially in the label-free analysis of complex proteomics samples where complications in peak detection, alignment, and integration are a significant obstacle. In practice, alignment, identification, and quantification of LC-MS peptide peak attributes (PPAs) may be accomplished using recently developed peak matching platforms (16–18). A highly sensitive indicator of protein abundance may be obtained by rolling up PPA measurements into protein-level information (16, 19, 20). Existing peptide-protein roll-up procedures based on PPAs typically involve taking the mean of (possibly normalized) PPA measurements over all peptides corresponding to a protein to obtain a protein-level estimate of abundance. Despite the promise of PPA-based procedures for protein quantification, the performance of PPA-based methods may vary widely depending on the particular roll-up procedure used; furthermore, PPA-based procedures are limited by difficulties in accurately identifying and measuring peptide peak attributes. These two issues are related as the latter issue affects the robustness of PPA-based roll-up methods. Indeed, existing peak matching and quantification platforms tend to result in PPA measurement data sets with substantial missingness (16, 19, 21), especially when working with very complex samples where substantial dynamic ranges and ion suppression are difficulties that must be overcome. Missingness may, in turn, lead to instability in protein-level abundance estimates. A good peptide-protein roll-up procedure that utilizes PPAs should account for this missingness and the resulting instability in a principled way. However, even in the absence of missingness, there is no consensus in the existing literature on peptide-protein roll-up for PPA measurements.In this work, we propose ProPCA, a peptide-protein roll-up method for efficiently extracting protein abundance information from bottom-up label-free LC-MS/MS data. ProPCA is an easily implemented, unsupervised method that is related to principle component analysis (PCA) (22). ProPCA optimally combines SC and PPA data to obtain estimates of relative protein abundance. ProPCA addresses missingness in PPA measurement data in a unified way while capitalizing on strengths of both SCs and PPA-based roll-up methods. In particular, ProPCA adapts to the quality of the available PPA measurement data. If the PPA measurement data are poor and, in the extreme case, no PPA measurements are available, then ProPCA is equivalent to spectral counting. On the other hand, if there is no missingness in the PPA measurement data set, then the ProPCA estimate is a weighted mean of PPA measurements and spectral counts where the weights are chosen to reflect the ability of spectral counts and each peptide to predict protein abundance.Below, we assess the performance of ProPCA using a data set obtained from the LC-MS/MS analysis of protein standards (UPS2 proteomic dynamic range standard set² manufactured by Sigma-Aldrich) and show that ProPCA outperformed other existing roll-up methods by multiple metrics. The applicability of ProPCA is not limited by the quantification platform used to obtain SCs and PPA measurements. To demonstrate this, we show that ProPCA continued to perform well when used with an alternative quantification platform. Finally, we applied ProPCA to a comparative LC-MS/MS analysis of digested total human hepatocellular carcinoma (HepG2) cell lysates prepared for LC-MS/MS analysis by alternative lysis methods. We show that ProPCA identified more differentially abundant proteins than competing methods.     

A new algorithm using cross-assignment for label-free quantitation with LC-LTQ-FT MS

A new algorithm is described for label-free quantitation of relative protein abundances across multiple complex proteomic samples. Q-MEND is based on the denoising and peak picking algorithm, MEND, previously developed in our laboratory. Q-MEND takes advantage of the high resolution and mass accuracy of the hybrid LTQ-FT MS mass spectrometer (or other high-resolution mass spectrometers, such as a Q-TOF MS). The strategy, termed "cross-assignment", is introduced to increase substantially the number of quantitated proteins. In this approach, all MS/MS identifications for the set of analyzed samples are combined into a master ID list, and then each LC-MS run is searched for the features that can be assigned to a specific identification from that master list. The reliability of quantitation is enhanced by quantitating separately all peptide charge states, along with a scoring procedure to filter out less reliable peptide abundance measurements. The effectiveness of Q-MEND is illustrated in the relative quantitative analysis of Escherichia coli samples spiked with known amounts of non-E. coli protein digests. A mean quantitation accuracy of 7% and mean precision of 15% is demonstrated. Q-MEND can perform relative quantitation of a set of LC-MS data sets without manual intervention and can generate files compatible with the Guidelines for Proteomic Data Publication.     

Proteomic reactors and their applications in biology

Proteomic analysis requires the combination of an extensive suite of technologies including protein processing and separation, micro-flow HPLC, MS and bioinformatics. Although proteomic technologies are still in flux, approaches that bypass gel electrophoresis (gel-free approaches) are dominating the field of proteomics. Along with the development of gel-free proteomics, came the development of devices for the processing of proteomic samples termed proteomic reactors. These microfluidic devices provide rapid, robust and efficient pre-MS sample procession by performing protein sample preparation/concentration, digestion and peptide fractionation. The proteomic reactor has advanced in two major directions: immobilized enzyme reactor and ion exchange-based proteomic reactor. This review summarizes the technical developments and biological applications of the proteomic reactor over the last decade.     

Multi-component immunoaffinity subtraction chromatography: an innovative step towards a comprehensive survey of the human plasma proteome

In order to discover novel protein markers indicative of disease processes or drug effects, the proteomics technology platform most commonly used consists of high resolution protein separation by two-dimensional electrophoresis (2-DE), mass spectrometric identification of proteins from stained gel spots and a bioinformatic data analysis process supported by statistics. This approach has been more successful in profiling proteins and their disease- or treatment-related quantitative changes in tissue homogenates than in plasma samples. Plasma protein display and quantitation suffer from several disadvantages: very high abundance of a few proteins; high heterogeneity of many proteins resulting in long charge trains; crowding of 2-DE separated protein spots in the molecular mass range between 45-80 kD and in the isoelectric point range between 4.5 and 6. Therefore, proteomic technologies are needed that address these problems and particularly allow accurate quantitation of a larger number of less abundant proteins in plasma and other body fluids. The immunoaffinity-based protein subtraction chromatography (IASC) described here removes multiple proteins present in plasma and serum in high concentrations effectively and reproducibly. Applying IASC as an upfront plasma sample preparation process for 2-DE, the protein spot pattern observed in gels changes dramatically and at least 350 additional lower abundance proteins are visualized. Affinity-purified polyclonal antibodies (pAbs) are the immunoaffinity reagents used to specifically remove the abundant proteins such as albumin, immunoglobulin G, immunoglobulin A, transferrin, haptoglobin, alpha-1-antitrypsin, hemopexin, transthyretin, alpha-2-HS glycoprotein, alpha-1-acid glycoprotein, alpha-2-macroglobulin and fibrinogen from human plasma samples. To render the immunoaffinity subtraction procedure recyclable, the pAbs are immobilized and cross-linked on chromatographic matrices. Antibody-coupled matrices specific for one protein each can be pooled to form mixed-bed IASC columns. We show that up to ten affinity-bound plasma proteins with similar solubility characteristics are eluted from a mixed-bed column in one step. This facilitates automated chromatographic processing of plasma samples in high throughput, which is desirable in proteomic disease marker discovery projects.     

Quantitative analysis of SILAC data sets using spectral counting

We report a new quantitative proteomics approach that combines the best aspects of stable isotope labeling of amino acids in cell culture (SILAC) labeling and spectral counting. The SILAC peptide count ratio analysis (SPeCtRA, http://proteomics.mcw.edu/visualize ) method relies on MS² spectra rather than ion chromatograms for quantitation and therefore does not require the use of high mass accuracy mass spectrometers. The inclusion of a stable isotope label allows the samples to be combined before sample preparation and analysis, thus avoiding many of the sources of variability that can plague spectral counting. To validate the SPeCtRA method, we have analyzed samples constructed with known ratios of protein abundance. Finally, we used SPeCtRA to compare endothelial cell protein abundances between high (20 mM) and low (11 mM) glucose culture conditions. Our results demonstrate that SPeCtRA is a protein quantification technique that is accurate and sensitive as well as easy to automate and apply to high‐throughput analysis of complex biological samples.     

Characterization of the mouse brain proteome using global proteomic analysis complemented with cysteinyl-peptide enrichment

We report a global proteomic approach for analyzing brain tissue and for the first time a comprehensive characterization of the whole mouse brain proteome. Preparation of the whole brain sample incorporated a highly efficient cysteinyl-peptide enrichment (CPE) technique to complement a global enzymatic digestion method. Both the global and the cysteinyl-enriched peptide samples were analyzed by SCX fractionation coupled with reversed phase LC-MS/MS analysis. A total of 48,328 different peptides were confidently identified (>98% confidence level), covering 7792 nonredundant proteins ( approximately 34% of the predicted mouse proteome). A total of 1564 and 1859 proteins were identified exclusively from the cysteinyl-peptide and the global peptide samples, respectively, corresponding to 25% and 31% improvements in proteome coverage compared to analysis of only the global peptide or cysteinyl-peptide samples. The identified proteins provide a broad representation of the mouse proteome with little bias evident due to protein pI, molecular weight, and/or cellular localization. Approximately 26% of the identified proteins with gene ontology (GO) annotations were membrane proteins, with 1447 proteins predicted to have transmembrane domains, and many of the membrane proteins were found to be involved in transport and cell signaling. The MS/MS spectrum count information for the identified proteins was used to provide a measure of relative protein abundances. The mouse brain peptide/protein database generated from this study represents the most comprehensive proteome coverage for the mammalian brain to date, and the basis for future quantitative brain proteomic studies using mouse models. The proteomic approach presented here may have broad applications for rapid proteomic analyses of various mouse models of human brain diseases.