Differences in the subcellular localization of alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes can affect the subtype selectivity of drugs in a study with the fluorescent ligand BODIPY FL-prazosin

G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) subtypes are differentially distributed in the cell; however, it remains unclear how this affects the subtype selectivity of particular drugs. In the present study, we used flow cytometry analysis with the fluorescent ligand, BODIPY FL-prazosin, to study the relationship between the subcellular distribution of subtype receptors and the subtype-selective character of ligands using alpha1a and alpha1b-adrenoceptors (ARs). Alpha1a-ARs predominantly localize inside the cell, while alpha1b-ARs on the cell surface. Flow cytometry analysis and confocal laser-scanning micrographs of living cells showed that BODIPY FL-prazosin can label not only alpha1-ARs on the cell surface, but also those localized inside the cell. Furthermore, flow cytometry analysis of alpha1A-AR-selective drug, KMD-3213, and alpha1B-AR-selective drug, CEC, revealed that the major determinant of the subtype selectivity of each drug is different. The alpha1A-AR selectivity of KMD-3213 can be explained by its much higher affinity for alpha1a-AR than alpha1b-AR (affinity-dependent selectivity), while the alpha1B-AR selectivity of the hydrophilic alkylating agent CEC is due to preferential inactivation of alpha1-ARs on the cell surface (receptor localization-dependent selectivity). This study illustrates that factors in addition to the affinity of the drug for the receptor, such as subcellular localization of the receptor, should be taken into account in assessing the subtype selectivity of a drug.     

Transgenic studies of alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor subtype function

Mice with altered alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor (AR) genes have become important tools in elucidating the subtype-specific functions of the three alpha(1)-AR subtypes because of the lack of sufficiently subtype-selective pharmacological agents. Mice with a deletion (knockout, KO) or an overexpression (transgenic, TG) of the alpha(1A)-, alpha(1B)-, or alpha(1D)-AR subtypes have been generated. The alpha(1)-ARs are the principal mediators of the hypertensive response to alpha(1)-agonists in the cardiovascular system. Studies with these mice indicate that alpha(1A)-AR and alpha(1B)-AR subtypes play an important role in cardiac development and/or function as well as in blood pressure (BP) response to alpha(1)-agonists via vasoconstriction. The alpha(1B)- and alpha(1D)-subtypes also appear to be involved in central nervous system (CNS) processes such as nociceptive responses, modulation of memory consolidation and working memory. The ability to study subtype-specific functions in different mouse strains by altering the same alpha(1)-AR in different ways strengthens the conclusions drawn from these studies. Although these genetic approaches have limitations, they have significantly increased our understanding of the functions of alpha(1)-AR subtypes.     

Bioisosteric phentolamine analogs as potent alpha-adrenergic antagonists

The synthesis and biological evaluation of a new series of bioisosteric phentolamine analogs are described. Replacement of the carbon next to the imidazoline ring of phentolamine with a nitrogen atom provides compounds (2, 3) that are about 1.6 times and 4.1 times more potent functionally than phentolamine on rat alpha1-adrenergic receptors, respectively. In receptor binding assays, the affinities of phentolamine and its bioisosteric analogs were determined on the human embryonic kidney (HEK) and Chinese Hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines expressing the human alpha1- and alpha2-AR subtypes, respectively. Analogs 2 and 3, both, displayed higher binding affinities at the alpha2- versus the alpha1-ARs, affinities being the least at the alpha1B-AR. Binding affinities of the methoxy ether analog 2 were greater than those of the phenolic analog 3 at all six alpha-AR subtypes. One of the nitrogen atoms in the imidazoline ring of phentolamine was replaced with an oxygen atom to give compounds 4 and 5, resulting in a 2-substituted oxazoline ring. The low functional antagonist activity on rat aorta, and binding potencies of these two compounds on human alpha1A- and alpha2A-AR subtypes indicate that a basic functional group is important for optimum binding to the alpha1- and alpha2A-adrenergic receptors.     

Identification of duplicated fourth alpha2-adrenergic receptor subtype by cloning and mapping of five receptor genes in zebrafish

The alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors (alpha(2)-ARs) belong to the large family of rhodopsinlike G-protein-coupled receptors that share a common structure of seven transmembrane (TM) alpha-helices. The aims of this study were (1) to determine the number of alpha(2)-AR genes in a teleost fish, the zebrafish (Danio rerio), (2) to study the gene duplication events that generated the alpha(2)-AR subtypes, and (3) to study changes in receptor structure that have occurred since the divergence of the mammalian and fish lineages. Here, we report the cloning and chromosomal mapping of fish orthologs for all three mammalian alpha(2)-ARs. In addition, we identified a fourth alpha(2)-AR subtype with two duplicates in zebrafish. Chromosomal mapping showed that the zebrafish alpha(2)-AR genes are located within conserved chromosomal segments, consistent with the origin of the four alpha(2)-AR subtypes by two rounds of chromosome or block duplication before the divergence of the ray fin fish and tetrapod lineages. Thus, the fourth subtype has apparently been present in the common ancestor of vertebrates but has been deleted or is yet to be identified in mammals. The overall percentage identity between the fish and mammalian orthologs is 53% to 67%, and in the TM regions 80% to 87%. These values are clearly lower than what is observed between mammalian orthologs. Still, all of the residues thought to be important for alpha(2)-adrenergic ligand binding are conserved across species and subtypes, and even the most divergent regions of the fish receptors show clear "molecular fingerprints" typical for orthologs of a given subtype.     

Binding kinetics and sequencing of hepatic alpha1-adrenergic receptors in two marine teleosts, mackerel (Scomber scombrus) and anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus)

Liver alpha(1)-adrenoceptors (ARs) are demonstrated, or at least hypothesized, in freshwater and brackish-water teleosts, whereas no data are available for marine teleosts. This study evaluates the presence of alpha(1)-ARs in the liver of two marine teleosts, the anchovy Engraulis encrasicolus and the mackerel Scomber scombrus, and examines on a broad scale the possibility that habitats posing different challenges also influence phenotypic trait selection. Binding assays were performed also on liver membranes from the carp Cyprinus carpio as a direct comparison with a freshwater species. Scatchard analysis of [(3)H]prazosin binding to purified liver membranes from anchovy, mackerel and carp resulted in K(d) values of 1.51+/-0.085, 1.26+/-0.098, and 2.61+/-0.22 nM, and B(max) values of 87.4+/-9.12, 77+/-8.29, and 115.22+/-3.31 fmol/mg protein, respectively. Thus, alpha(1)-ARs of the two marine teleosts showed higher [(3)H]prazosin affinity compared with those of the freshwater/brackish-water fish studied thus far, whereas the number of liver binding sites did not differ significantly from that of carp, eel or trout. A preliminary phylogeny based on amino acid sequence analysis indicated the presence of at least an alpha(1A)-AR in mackerel and an alpha(1D)-AR in both anchovy and mackerel. This is the first indication of alpha(1)-AR subtypes in any marine species, but further studies are needed to ascertain the physiological role of these alpha(1)-ARs in these two marine species.     

Alpha 1-adrenergic receptor responses in alpha 1AB-AR knockout mouse hearts suggest the presence of alpha 1D-AR

Two functional alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor (AR) subtypes (alpha(1A) and alpha(1B)) have been identified in the mouse heart. However, it is unclear whether the third known subtype, alpha(1D)-AR, is also present. To investigate this, we determined whether there were alpha(1)-AR responses in hearts from a novel mouse model lacking alpha(1A)- and alpha(1B)-ARs (double knockout) (ABKO). In Langendorff-perfused hearts, alpha(1)-ARs were stimulated with phenylephrine. For ABKO hearts, phenylephrine reduced left ventricular pressure and coronary flow (to 87 +/- 2% and 86 +/- 4% of initial, respectively, n = 11, P < 0.01). These effects were blocked by prazosin and 8-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]-8-azaspirol[4,5]decane-7,9-dione] dihydrochloride, suggesting that alpha(1D)-AR-mediated responses were present. In contrast, right ventricular trabeculae from ABKO hearts did not respond to phenylephrine, suggesting that in ABKO perfused hearts, the effects of phenylephrine were not mediated by direct actions on cardiomyocytes. A novel finding was that alpha(1)-AR stimulation caused positive inotropy in the wild-type mouse heart, in contrast to negative inotropy observed in mouse cardiac muscle strips. We conclude that mouse hearts lacking alpha(1A)- and alpha(1B)-ARs retain functional alpha(1)-AR responses involving decreases of coronary flow and ventricular pressure that reflect alpha(1D)-AR-mediated vasoconstriction. Furthermore, alpha(1)-AR inotropic responses depend critically on the experimental conditions.     

The evolution of alpha-blockers for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia

Alpha-blockers have been evaluated for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) for 30 years, from early trials with the nonselective alpha-inhibitor phenoxybenzamine to short-acting (prazosin) then long-acting (terazosin, doxazosin, tamsulosin, alfuzosin) selective alpha(1)-antagonists. All of the alpha-blockers evaluated have demonstrated comparable effectiveness, and the evolution of alpha-blocker therapy for BPH has therefore focused primarily on improving convenience and tolerability. Although all of the long-acting alpha(1)-blockers are well tolerated, only tamsulosin and alfuzosin SR are administered without the requirement for dose titration. Alfuzosin has the additional advantage over tamsulosin of a lower incidence of ejaculatory dysfunction. Studies of subtype-selective alpha(1)-antagonists have not demonstrated superior efficacy or improved tolerability over the existing long-acting alpha(1)-blockers.     

Systemic alpha 1A-adrenoceptor antagonist inhibits neointimal growth after balloon injury of rat carotid artery

Previous in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that norepinephrine, acting through alpha(1A)-adrenoceptors, stimulates hypertrophy, proliferation, and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells and adventitial fibroblasts and may contribute to neointimal growth, lumen loss, and inward remodeling caused by iatrogenic wall injury and vascular disease. Our present aim was to determine whether intravenous administration of the alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor antagonist KMD-3213, at dosages without systemic hemodynamic effects, inhibits wall growth after injury. Inhibition of alpha(1A)-adrenoceptors with 12.8 and 32 microg/kg KMD-3213 had no effect on arterial pressure or renal and hindquarter resistances in anesthetized rats. A second group then received carotid balloon injury and continuous intravenous KMD-3213 at 4 and 10 microg x kg(-1) x h(-1) for 2 wk. Mean, systolic, and diastolic arterial pressures and heart rate of conscious unrestrained rats were unaffected. KMD-3213 reduced neointima growth by approximately 30 and 46% at the two doses (P < 0.01). These data support the novel hypothesis that a direct alpha(1A)-adrenoceptor-dependent trophic action of catecholamines is augmented by injury and may contribute significantly to hypertrophic vascular disease.     

Silent alpha(2C)-adrenergic receptors enable cold-induced vasoconstriction in cutaneous arteries

Cold constricts cutaneous blood vessels by increasing the reactivity of smooth muscle alpha(2)-adrenergic receptors (alpha(2)-ARs). Experiments were performed to determine the role of alpha(2)-AR subtypes (alpha(2A)-, alpha(2B)-, alpha(2C)-ARs) in this response. Stimulation of alpha(1)-ARs by phenylephrine or alpha(2)-ARs by UK-14,304 caused constriction of isolated mouse tail arteries mounted in a pressurized myograph system. Compared with proximal arteries, distal arteries were more responsive to alpha(2)-AR activation but less responsive to activation of alpha(1)-ARs. Cold augmented constriction to alpha(2)-AR activation in distal arteries but did not affect the response to alpha(1)-AR stimulation or the level of myogenic tone. Western blot analysis demonstrated expression of alpha(2A)- and alpha(2C)-ARs in tail arteries: expression of alpha(2C)-ARs decreased in distal compared with proximal arteries, whereas expression of the glycosylated form of the alpha(2A)-AR increased in distal arteries. At 37 degrees C, alpha(2)-AR-induced vasoconstriction in distal arteries was inhibited by selective blockade of alpha(2A)-ARs (BRL-44408) but not by selective inhibition of alpha(2B)-ARs (ARC-239) or alpha(2C)-ARs (MK-912). In contrast, during cold exposure (28 degrees C), the augmented response to UK-14,304 was inhibited by the alpha(2C)-AR antagonist MK-912, which selectively abolished cold-induced amplification of the response. These experiments indicate that cold-induced amplification of alpha(2)-ARs is mediated by alpha(2C)-ARs that are normally silent in these cutaneous arteries. Blockade of alpha(2C)-ARs may prove an effective treatment for Raynaud's Phenomenon.     

Cell surface expression of alpha1D-adrenergic receptors is controlled by heterodimerization with alpha1B-adrenergic receptors

alpha(1)-Adrenergic receptors (ARs) belong to the large Class I G protein-coupled receptor superfamily and comprise three subtypes (alpha(1A), alpha(1B), and alpha(1D)). Previous work with heterologously expressed C-terminal green fluorescent protein (GFP)-tagged alpha(1)-ARs showed that alpha(1A)- and alpha(1B)-ARs localize to the plasma membrane, whereas alpha(1D)-ARs accumulate intracellularly. We recently showed that alpha(1D)- and alpha(1B)-ARs form heterodimers, whereas alpha(1D)- and alpha(1A)-ARs do not. Here, we examined the role of heterodimerization in regulating alpha(1D)-AR localization using both confocal imaging of GFP- or CFP-tagged alpha(1)-ARs and a luminometer-based surface expression assay in HEK293 cells. Co-expression with alpha(1B)-ARs caused alpha(1D)-ARs to quantitatively translocate to the cell surface, but co-expression with alpha(1A)-ARs did not. Truncation of the alpha(1B)-AR extracellular N terminus or intracellular C terminus had no effect on surface expression of alpha(1D)-ARs, suggesting primary involvement of the hydrophobic core. Co-transfection with an uncoupled mutant alpha(1B)-AR (Delta12alpha(1B)) increased both alpha(1D)-AR surface expression and coupling to norepinephrine-stimulated Ca(2+) mobilization. Finally, GFP-tagged alpha(1D)-ARs were not detected on the cell surface when expressed in rat aortic smooth muscle cells that express no endogenous ARs, but were almost exclusively localized on the surface when expressed in DDT(1)MF-2 cells, which express endogenous alpha(1B)-ARs. These studies demonstrate that alpha(1B)/alpha(1D)-AR heterodimerization controls surface expression and functional coupling of alpha(1D)-ARs, the N- and C-terminal domains are not involved in this interaction, and that alpha(1B)-AR G protein coupling is not required. These observations may be relevant to many other Class I G protein-coupled receptors, where the functional consequences of heterodimerization are still poorly understood.     

Phenoxybenzamine binding reveals the helical orientation of the third transmembrane domain of adrenergic receptors

Phenoxybenzamine (PB), a classical alpha-adrenergic antagonist, binds irreversibly to the alpha-adrenergic receptors (ARs). Amino acid sequence alignments and the predicted helical arrangement of the seven transmembrane (TM) domains suggested an accessible cysteine residue in transmembrane 3 of the alpha(2)-ARs, in position C(3.36) (in subtypes A, B, and C corresponding to amino acid residue numbers 117/96/135, respectively), as a possible site for the PB interaction. Irreversible binding of PB to recombinant human alpha(2)-ARs (90 nm, 30 min) reduced the ligand binding capacity of alpha(2A)-, alpha(2B)-, and alpha(2C)-AR by 81, 96, and 77%. When the TM3 cysteine, Cys(117), of alpha(2A)-AR was mutated to valine (alpha(2A)-C117V), the receptor became resistant to PB (inactivation, 10%). The beta(2)-AR contains a valine in this position (V(3.36); position number 117) and a cysteine in the preceding position (Cys(116)) and was not inactivated by PB (10 microm, 30 min) (inactivation 26%). The helical orientation of TM3 was tested by exchanging the amino acids at positions 116 and 117 of the alpha(2A)-AR and beta(2)-AR. The alpha(2A)-F116C/C117V mutant was resistant to PB (inactivation, 7%), whereas beta(2)-V117C was irreversibly inactivated (inactivation, 93%), confirming that position 3.36 is exposed to receptor ligands, and position 3.35 is not exposed in the binding pocket.     

Subtype-selective noncompetitive or competitive inhibition of human alpha1-adrenergic receptors by rho-TIA

The 19-amino acid conopeptide (rho-TIA) was shown previously to antagonize noncompetitively alpha(1B)-adrenergic receptors (ARs). Because this is the first peptide ligand for these receptors, we compared its interactions with the three recombinant human alpha(1)-AR subtypes (alpha(1A), alpha(1B), and alpha(1D)). Radioligand binding assays showed that rho-TIA was 10-fold selective for human alpha(1B)-over alpha(1A)- and alpha(1D)-ARs. As observed with hamster alpha(1B)-ARs, rho-TIA decreased the number of binding sites (B(max)) for human alpha(1B)-ARs without changing affinity (K(D)), and this inhibition was unaffected by the length of incubation but was reversed by washing. However, rho-TIA had opposite effects at human alpha(1A)-ARs and alpha(1D)-ARs, decreasing K(D) without changing B(max), suggesting it acts competitively at these subtypes. rho-TIA reduced maximal NE-stimulated [(3)H]inositol phosphate formation in HEK293 cells expressing human alpha(1B)-ARs but competitively inhibited responses in cells expressing alpha(1A)- or alpha(1D)-ARs. Truncation mutants showed that the amino-terminal domains of alpha(1B)- or alpha(1D)-ARs are not involved in interaction with rho-TIA. Alanine-scanning mutagenesis of rho-TIA showed F18A had an increased selectivity for alpha(1B)-ARs, and F18N also increased subtype selectivity. I8A had a slightly reduced potency at alpha(1B)-ARs and was found to be a competitive, rather than noncompetitive, inhibitor in both radioligand and functional assays. Thus rho-TIA noncompetitively inhibits alpha(1B)-ARs but competitively inhibits the other two subtypes, and this selectivity can be increased by mutation. These differential interactions do not involve the receptor amino termini and are not because of the charged nature of the peptide, and isoleucine 8 is critical for its noncompetitive inhibition at alpha(1B)-ARs.     

Subtype-specific neuronal differentiation of PC12 cells transfected with alpha2-adrenergic receptors

Cells of the PC12 rat pheochromocytoma cell line acquire characteristics of sympathetic neurons under appropriate treatment. Stably transfected PC12 cells expressing individual alpha2-adrenergic receptor (alpha2-AR) subtypes were used to assess the role of alpha2-ARs in neuronal differentiation and to characterise the signalling pathways activated by the alpha2-AR agonist epinephrine in these cells. The effects of alpha2-AR activation were compared with the differentiating action and the signalling mechanisms of nerve growth factor (NGF). Epinephrine induced neuronal differentiation of PC12alpha2 cells through alpha2-AR activation in a subtype-dependent manner, internalization of all human alpha2-AR subtypes, and activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and the serine-threonine protein kinase Akt. Epinephrine and NGF showed synergism in their differentiating effects. The MAPK kinase (MEK-1) inhibitor PD 98059 abolished the differentiating effect of epinephrine indicating that the differentiation is dependent on MAPK activation. Activating protein-1 (AP-1) DNA-binding activity was increased after epinephrine treatment in all three PC12alpha2 subtype clones. Evaluation of the potential physiological consequences of these findings requires further studies on endogenously expressed alpha2-ARs in neuronal cells.     

Distribution of alpha1-adrenoceptor subtype mRNA and identification of subtype responsible for renovascular contraction in human renal artery

This study was intended to quantify the amounts of the alpha1-adrenoceptor subtype mRNAs in human renal artery and to demonstrate the distribution of receptor subtypes responsible for the contraction of the renal artery. RNase protection assay showed that the mean amount of alpha1a mRNA was much greater than that of alpha1b or alpha1d mRNAs in both the main and branch renal arteries. However, the abundance of alpha1a mRNA in human renal artery was much less than in our previous data in the prostate. In situ hybridization showed that all alpha1 subtype mRNAs were localized in the smooth muscle cells of the tunica media of the artery, and the distribution pattern of these three mRNAs in the main artery was the same as in the branch artery. However, the intensity of signals for alpha1d and alpha1b antisense RNAs probes was lower than that for the alpha1a antisense RNA probe. In the functional study, concentration-response curves to noradrenaline pretreated with KMD-3213, an alpha1A/L-adrenoceptor selective antagonist, seemed to be biphasic in nature. Chloroethyclonidine (CEC) failed to inactivate the noradrenaline-induced contraction, and prazosin showed relatively low affinity with a pA2 value of 8.8. These data suggest that the alpha1A/L-adrenoceptor mediates primarily those responses to noradrenaline in this artery. The other alpha1-adrenoceptor subtypes could also mediate the secondary contractile response to noradrenaline in this artery.     

Comparison of [3H]tamsulosin and [3H]prazosin binding to wild-type and constitutively active alpha1B-adrenoceptors

We have tested the hypothesis that smaller alpha1B-adrenoceptor labeling by [3H]tamsulosin compared to [3H]prazosin is related to differential recognition of agonist low affinity states. Paired saturation binding experiments with [3H]prazosin and [3H]tamsulosin were performed in membrane preparations from rat liver and Rat- fibroblasts stably transfected with wild-type hamster alpha1B-adrenoceptors or a constitutively active mutant thereof. In all three settings [3H]tamsulosin labeled significantly fewer alpha1B-adrenoceptors than [3H]prazosin. In noradrenaline competition binding experiments, the percentage of agonist low affinity sites was smallest for the constitutively active alpha1B-adrenoceptor but the percentage of agonist low affinity sites recognized by [3H]tamsulosin and [3H]prazosin did not differ significantly. We conclude that [3H]tamsulosin labels fewer alpha1B-adrenoceptors than [3H]prazosin but this is not fully explained by a poorer labeling of agonist low affinity sites.     

New pyrimido[5,4-b]indoles and [1]benzothieno[3,2-d]pyrimidines: high affinity ligands for the alpha(1)-adrenoceptor subtypes

A number of new pyrimido[5,4-b]indole and [1]benzothieno[3,2-d]pyrimidine derivatives were synthesized and evaluated for their binding and functional properties at alpha(1)-adrenergic receptor (alpha(1)-AR) subtypes. They behaved as potent alpha(1)-AR antagonists. In binding experiments, some of them (RC24 and RC23) showed very high affinity for the alpha(1D)-AR subtype.     

Model structures of alpha-2 adrenoceptors in complex with automatically docked antagonist ligands raise the possibility of interactions dissimilar from agonist ligands

Antagonist binding to alpha-2 adrenoceptors (alpha2-ARs) is not well understood. Structural models were constructed for the three human alpha2-AR subtypes based on the bovine rhodopsin X-ray structure. Twelve antagonist ligands (including covalently binding phenoxybenzamine) were automatically docked to the models. A hallmark of agonist binding is the electrostatic interaction between a positive charge on the agonist and the negatively charged side chain of D3.32. For antagonist binding, ion-pair formation would require deviations of the models from the rhodopsin structural template, e.g., a rotation of TM3 to relocate D3.32 more centrally within the binding cavity, and/or creation of new space near TM2/TM7 such that antagonists would be shifted away from TM5. Thus, except for the quinazolines, antagonist ligands automatically docked to the model structures did not form ion-pairs with D3.32. This binding mode represents a valid alternative, whereby the positive charge on the antagonists is stabilized by cation-pi interactions with aromatic residues (e.g., F6.51) and antagonists interact with D3.32 via carboxylate-aromatic interactions. This binding mode is in good agreement with maps derived from a molecular interaction library that predicts favorable atomic contacts; similar interaction environments are seen for unrelated proteins in complex with ligands sharing similarities with the alpha2-AR antagonists.