DNA Repair 2008: Tenth Biennial Meeting of the German Society for Research on DNA Repair

The Tenth Meeting of the German Society for Research on DNA Repair was held in Berlin in September 2008. Invited presentations by Yosef Shiloh, Stanton L. Gerson, Sacha Beneke, Patrick Concannon, Jochen Dahm-Daphi, Thilo Dörk, Friedrike Eckardt-Schupp, Bernd Epe, Ian Hickson, Ulrich Hübscher, Penny Jeggo, Malik Lutzmann, Christof Niehrs, Primo Schär and Predrag Slijepcevic together with over 80 selected oral and poster presentations generated an inspiring scientific program, which documented the impressive progress of the community and defined future challenges in the field.     

The "Dutch DNA Repair Group", in retrospect

The "Dutch DNA Repair Group" was established about 35 years ago. In this brief historical review some of the crucial decisions are described that have contributed to the relative success of the research of this group. The emphasis of the work of this group has been for many years on the genetic analysis of nucleotide excision repair (NER) and genetic diseases based on defects in this repair process: xeroderma pigmentosum (XP), Cockayne syndrome and trichothiodystrophy.     

DNA Repair Pathways in Trypanosomatids: from DNA Repair to Drug Resistance

SUMMARY

All living organisms are continuously faced with endogenous or exogenous stress conditions affecting genome stability. DNA repair pathways act as a defense mechanism, which is essential to maintain DNA integrity. There is much to learn about the regulation and functions of these mechanisms, not only in human cells but also equally in divergent organisms. In trypanosomatids, DNA repair pathways protect the genome against mutations but also act as an adaptive mechanism to promote drug resistance. In this review, we scrutinize the molecular mechanisms and DNA repair pathways which are conserved in trypanosomatids. The recent advances made by the genome consortiums reveal the complete genomic sequences of several pathogens. Therefore, using bioinformatics and genomic sequences, we analyze the conservation of DNA repair proteins and their key protein motifs in trypanosomatids. We thus present a comprehensive view of DNA repair processes in trypanosomatids at the crossroads of DNA repair and drug resistance.     

Repair of oxidative DNA damage

Cellular genomes suffer extensive damage from exogenous agents and reactive oxygen species formed during normal metabolism. The MutT homologs (MutT/MTH) remove oxidized nucleotide precursors so that they cannot be incorporated into DNA during replication. Among many repair pathways, the base excision repair (BER) pathway is the most important cellular protection mechanism responding to oxidative DNA damage. The 8-oxoG glycosylases (Fpg or MutM/OGG) and the MutY homologs (MutY/MYH) glycosylases along with MutT/MTH protect cells from the mutagenic effects of 8-oxoG, the most stable and deleterious product known caused by oxidative damage to DNA. The key enzymes in the BER process are DNA glycosylases, which remove different damaged bases by cleavage of the N-glycosylic bonds between the bases and the deoxyribose moieties of the nucleotide residues. Biochemical and structural studies have demonstrated the substrate recognition and reaction mechanism of BER enzymes. Cocrystal structures of strated the substrate recognition and reaction mechanism of BER enzymes. Cocrystal structures of several glycosylases show that the substrate base flips out of the sharply bent DNA helix and the minor groove is widened to be accessed by the glycosylases. To complete the repair after glycosylase action, the apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) site is further processed by an incision step, DNA synthesis, an excision step, and DNA ligation through two alternative pathways. The short-patch BER (1-nucleotide patch size) and long-patch BER (2–6-nucleotide patch size) pathways need AP endonuclease to generate a 3′ hydroxyl group but require different sets of enzymes for DNA synthesis and ligation. Protein-protein interactions have been reported among the enzymes involved in BER. It is possible that the successive players in the repair pathway are assembled in a complex to perform concerted actions. The BER pathways are proposed to protect cells and organisms from mutagenesis and carcinogenesis.     

My Journey to DNA Repair

I completed my medical studies at the Karolinska Institute in Stockholm but have always been devoted to basic research. My longstanding interest is to understand fundamental DNA repair mechanisms in the fields of cancer therapy, inherited human genetic disorders and ancient DNA. I initially measured DNA decay, including rates of base loss and cytosine deamination. I have discovered several important DNA repair proteins and determined their mechanisms of action. The discovery of uracil-DNA glycosylase defined a new category of repair enzymes with each specialized for different types of DNA damage. The base excision repair pathway was first reconstituted with human proteins in my group. Cell-free analysis for mammalian nucleotide excision repair of DNA was also developed in my laboratory. I found multiple distinct DNA ligases in mammalian cells, and led the first genetic and biochemical work on DNA ligases Ⅰ, and Ⅳ. I discovered the mammalian exonucleases DNase Ⅲ (TREX1) and IV (FEN1). Interestingly, expression of TREX1 was altered in some human autoimmune diseases. I also showed that the mutagenic DNA adduct O6-methylguanine (O6 mG) is repaired without removing the guanine from DNA, identifying a surprising mechanism by which the methyl group is transferred to a residue in the repair protein itself. A further novel process of DNA repair discovered by my research group is the action of AlkB as an iron-dependent enzyme carrying out oxidative demethylation.     

DNA Repair in Potorous tridactylus

The DNA synthesized shortly after ultraviolet (UV) irradiation of Potorous tridactylis (PtK) cells sediments more slowly in alkali than that made by nonirradiated cells. The size of the single-strand segments is approximately equal to the average distance between 1 or 2 cyclobutyl pyrimidine dimers in the parental DNA. These data support the notion that dimers are the photoproducts which interrupt normal DNA replication. Upon incubation of irradiated cells the small segments are enlarged to form high molecular weight DNA as in nonirradiated cells. DNA synthesized at long times (~ 24 h) after irradiation is made in segments approximately equal to those synthesized by nonirradiated cells, although only 10-15% of the dimers have been removed by excision repair. These data imply that dimers are not the lesions which initially interrupt normal DNA replication in irradiated cells. In an attempt to resolve these conflicting interpretations, PtK cells were exposed to photoreactivating light after irradiation and before pulse-labeling, since photoreactivation repair is specific for only one type of UV lesion. After 1 h of exposure ~ 35% of the pyrimidine dimers have been monomerized, and the reduction in the percentage of dimers correlates with an increased size for the DNA synthesized by irradiated cells. Therefore, we conclude that the dimers are the lesions which initially interrupt DNA replication in irradiated PtK cells. The monomerization of pyrimidine dimers correlates with a disappearance of repair endonuclease-sensitive sites, as measured in vivo immediately after 1 h of photoreactivation, indicating that some of the sites sensitive to the repair endonuclease (from Micrococcus luteus) are pyrimidine dimers. However, at 24 h after irradiation and 1 h of photoreactivation there are no endonuclease-sensitive sites, even though ~ 50% of the pyrimidine dimers remain in the DNA. These data indicate that not all pyrimidine dimers are accessible to the repair endonuclease. The observation that at long times after irradiation DNA is made in segments equal to those synthesized by nonirradiated cells although only a small percentage of the dimers have been removed suggests that an additional repair system alters dimers so that they no longer interrupt DNA replication.     

Festkolloquium and Symposium "Präadaptation in der Evolution von Pflanze and Tier"

Zum Gelingen dieses Symposiums haben viele entscheidend beigetragen. Tatkräftige Hilfe bei der Organisation habe ich vielen Mitgliedern des Institutes zu verdanken. Stellvertretend für alle sollen nur Frau Dr. C. Gack and meine technische Assistentin, Frau Christine Gutmann , besonders crwähnt werden. Großzügige finanzielle Unterstützung erhielten wir von der Fa. Goedecke (Freiburg) und dem Herder-Verlag (Freiburg).     

DNA synthesis in P1 infected E. coli mutants temperature-sensitive in DNA replication

Summary P1 DNA is synthesized in the E. coli ts dna mutants 165/70 (elongation defect) and 252 (initiation defect) at elevated temperatures. In strain 165/70, P1 infection at 41°C leads to phage production accompanied by a transient recovery of bacterial DNA synthesis. No phages are produced byt P1 DNA is still synthesized in strain 252 if infected after host DNA replication has come to a halt at 42°C.     

H-NS Regulates DNA Repair in Shigella

We report a new role for H-NS in Shigella spp.: suppression of repair of DNA damage after UV irradiation. H-NS-mediated suppression of virulence gene expression is thermoregulated in Shigella, being functional at 30°C and nonfunctional at 37 to 40°C. We find that H-NS-mediated suppression of DNA repair after UV irradiation is also thermoregulated. Thus, Shigella flexneri M90T, incubated at 37 or 40°C postirradiation, shows up to 30-fold higher survival than when incubated at 30°C postirradiation. The hns mutants BS189 and BS208, both of which lack functional H-NS, show a high rate of survival (no repression) whether incubated at 30 or 40°C postirradiation. Suppression of DNA repair by H-NS is not mediated through genes on the invasion plasmid of S. flexneri M90T, since BS176, cured of plasmid, behaves identically to the parental M90T. Thus, in Shigella the nonfunctionality of H-NS permits enhanced DNA repair at temperatures encountered in the human host. However, pathogenic Escherichia coli strains (enteroinvasive and enterohemorrhagic E. coli) show low survival whether incubated at 30 or 40°C postirradiation. E. coli K-12 shows markedly different behavior; high survival postirradiation at both 30 and 40°C. These K-12 strains were originally selected from E. coli organisms subjected to both UV and X irradiation. Therefore, our data suggest that repair processes, extensively described for laboratory strains of E. coli, require experimental verification in pathogenic strains which were not adapted to irradiation.     

DNA Repair Functions in Heterologous Cells

Abstract

Our genetic information is constantly challenged by exposure to endogenous and exogenous DNA-damaging agents, by DNA polymerase errors, and thereby inherent instability of the DNA molecule itself. The integrity of our genetic information is maintained by numerous DNA repair pathways, and the importance of these pathways is underscored by their remarkable structural and functional conservation across the evolutionary spectrum. Because of the highly conserved nature of DNA repair, the enzymes involved in this crucial function are often able to function in heterologous cells; as an example, the E. coli Ada DNA repair methyltransferase functions efficiently in yeast, in cultured rodent and human cells, in transgenic mice, and in ex vivo-modified mouse bone marrow cells. The heterologous expression of DNA repair functions has not only been used as a powerful cloning strategy, but also for the exploration of the biological and biochemical features of numerous enzymes involved in DNA repair pathways. In this review we highlight examples where the expression of DNA repair enzymes in heterologous cells was used to address fundamental questions about DNA repair processes in many different organisms.     

DNA Repair in Human Leukaemic Lymphocytes

CHRONIC lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is a common human leukaemia¹ in older people. Its gradual progressive clinical course is frequently associated with lymphocyte dysfunction². In this disease lymphocyte counts are elevated and lymph nodes and organs are infiltrated with small abnormal lymphocytes which have scanty blue cytoplasm and round or clefted nuclei with clumped chromatin.     

Repair of DNA double-strand breaks requires two homologous DNA duplexes

DNA repair and cell survival in haploid and its diploid derivative strains ofSaccharomyces cerevisiae were studied after 100 krad X-ray irradiation. The cells were in theG ₁ stage of the cell cycle, where haploid cells had only one copy of genetic material per genome and diploid had two copies. It was found that diploid could repair double-strand breaks in its DNA after 48 hr of liquid holding which was accompanied by a four-fold rise in survival. In contrast a haploid strain failed to repair its DNA and showed no increase in survival after liquid holding. It is concluded that (1) repair of DNA double-strand breaks requires the availability of two homologous DNA duplexes, (2) restoration of cell viability during liquid holding is connected with repair of DNA double-strand breaks and (3) this repair is a slow process possibly associated with slow finding and conjugation of homologous chromosomes.     

Mitochondrial DNA Repair Pathways

It has long been held that there is no DNA repair in mitochondria. Early observations suggestedthat the reason for the observed accumulation of DNA damage in mitochondrial DNA is thatDNA lesions are not removed. This is in contrast to the very efficient repair that is seen inthe nuclear DNA. Mitochondrial DNA does not code for any DNA repair proteins, but it hasbeen observed that a number of repair factors can be found in mitochondrial extracts. Mostof these participate in the base excision DNA repair pathway which is responsible for theremoval of simple lesions in DNA. Recent work has shown that there is efficient base excisionrepair in mammalian mitochondria and there are also indications of the presence of morecomplex repair processes. Thus, an active field of mitochondrial DNA repair is emerging. Anunderstanding of the DNA repair processes in mammalian mitochondria is an important currentchallenge and it is likely to lead to clarification of the etiology of the common mutations anddeletions that are found in mitochondria, and which are thought to cause various humandisorders and to play a role in the aging phenotype.     

DNA Damage Response: Three Levels of DNA Repair Regulation

Genome integrity is challenged by DNA damage from both endogenous and environmental sources. This damage must be repaired to allow both RNA and DNA polymerases to accurately read and duplicate the information in the genome. Multiple repair enzymes scan the DNA for problems, remove the offending damage, and restore the DNA duplex. These repair mechanisms are regulated by DNA damage response kinases including DNA-PKcs, ATM, and ATR that are activated at DNA lesions. These kinases improve the efficiency of DNA repair by phosphorylating repair proteins to modify their activities, by initiating a complex series of changes in the local chromatin structure near the damage site, and by altering the overall cellular environment to make it more conducive to repair. In this review, we focus on these three levels of regulation to illustrate how the DNA damage kinases promote efficient repair to maintain genome integrity and prevent disease.The DNA in each of our cells accumulates thousands of lesions every day. This damaged DNA must be removed for the DNA code to be read properly. Fortunately, cells contain multiple DNA repair mechanisms including: base excision repair (BER) that removes damaged bases, mismatch repair (MMR) that recognizes base incorporation errors and base damage, nucleotide excision repair (NER) that removes bulky DNA adducts, and cross-link repair (ICL) that removes interstrand cross-links. In addition, breaks in the DNA backbone are repaired via double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways including homologous recombination (HR) and nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ). Some of these mechanisms can operate independently to repair simple lesions. However, the repair of more complex lesions involving multiple DNA processing steps is regulated by the DNA damage response (DDR). For the most difficult to repair lesions, the DDR can be essential for successful repair.The DDR consists of multiple pathways, but for the purposes of this review we will focus on the DDR kinase signaling cascades controlled by the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-related kinases (PIKK). These kinases include DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNA-PKcs), ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM), and ATM and Rad3-related (ATR). DNA-PKcs and ATM are primarily involved in DSB repair, whereas ATR responds to a wide range of DNA lesions, especially those associated with DNA replication (Cimprich and Cortez 2008). ATR’s versatility makes it essential for the viability of replicating cells in mice and humans (Brown and Baltimore 2000; de Klein et al. 2000; Cortez et al. 2001). In the case of ATM, inherited biallelic mutations cause ataxia-telangiectasia—a disorder characterized by neurodegeneration, immunodeficiency, and cancer (Shiloh 2003; Lavin 2008). ATM mutations are also frequently found in several types of tumors (Negrini et al. 2010).The DDR kinases share several common regulatory mechanisms of activation (Lovejoy and Cortez 2009). All three DDR kinases sense damage through protein–protein interactions that serve to recruit the kinases to damage sites. Once localized, posttranslational modifications and other protein–protein interactions fully activate the kinases to initate a cascade of phosphorylation events. The best-studied substrate of DNA-PKcs is actually DNA-PKcs itself, and autophosphorylation is an important step in direct religation of the DSB via nonhomologous end joining (NHEJ) (Weterings and Chen 2007; Dobbs et al. 2010). ATM and ATR have both unique and shared substrates that participate in DNA repair, checkpoint signaling, and determining cell fate decisions such as apoptosis and sensescence.     

Base Excision Repair of DNA: Glycosylases

The review considers the role of base excision repair in maintaining the constancy of genetic information in the cell. The genetic control and biochemical mechanism are described for the first stage of base excision repair, which is catalyzed by specific enzymes, DNA glycosylases.__________Translated from Genetika, Vol. 41, No. 6, 2005, pp. 725–735.Original Russian Text Copyright © 2005 by Korolev.     

X-ray crystallographic observation of "in-line" and "adjacent" conformations in a bulged self-cleaving RNA/DNA hybrid

The RNA strand in an RNA/DNA duplex with unpaired ribonucleotides can undergo self-cleavage at bulge sites in the presence of a variety of divalent metal ions (Hüsken et al., Biochemistry, 1996, 35:16591-16600). Transesterification proceeds via an in-line mechanism, with the 2'-OH of the bulged nucleotide attacking the 3'-adjacent phosphate group. The site-specificity of the reaction is most likely a consequence of the greater local conformational freedom of the RNA backbone in the bulge region. A standard A-form backbone geometry prohibits formation of an in-line arrangement between 2'-oxygen and phosphate. However, the backbone in the region of an unpaired nucleotide appears to be conducive to an in-line approach. Therefore, the bulge-mediated phosphoryl transfer reaction represents one of the simplest RNA self-cleavage systems. Here we focus on the conformational features of the RNA that underlie site-specific cleavage. The structures of an RNA/DNA duplex with single ribo-adenosyl bulges were analyzed in two crystal forms, permitting observation of 10 individual conformations of the RNA bulge moiety. The bulge geometries cover a range of relative arrangements between the 2'-oxygen of the bulged nucleotide and the P-O5' bond (including adjacent and near in-line) and give a detailed picture of the conformational changes necessary to line up the 2'-OH nucleophile and scissile bond. Although metal ions are of crucial importance in the catalysis of analogous cleavage reactions by ribozymes, it is clear that local strain or conformational flexibility in the RNA also affect cleavage selectivity and rate (Soukup & Breaker, RNA, 1999, 5:1308-1325). The geometries of the RNA bulges frozen out in the crystals provide snapshots along the reaction pathway prior to the transition state of the phosphoryl transfer reaction.     

Functional Characterization of Excision Repair and RecA-Dependent Recombinational DNA Repair in Campylobacter jejuni

The presence and functionality of DNA repair mechanisms in Campylobacter jejuni are largely unknown. In silico analysis of the complete translated genome of C. jejuni NCTC 11168 suggests the presence of genes involved in methyl-directed mismatch repair (MMR), nucleotide excision repair, base excision repair (BER), and recombinational repair. To assess the functionality of these putative repair mechanisms in C. jejuni, mutS, uvrB, ung, and recA knockout mutants were constructed and analyzed for their ability to repair spontaneous point mutations, UV irradiation-induced DNA damage, and nicked DNA. Inactivation of the different putative DNA repair genes did not alter the spontaneous mutation frequency. Disruption of the UvrB and RecA orthologues, but not the putative MutS or Ung proteins, resulted in a significant reduction in viability after exposure to UV irradiation. Assays performed with uracil-containing plasmid DNA showed that the putative uracil-DNA glycosylase (Ung) protein, important for initiation of the BER pathway, is also functional in C. jejuni. Inactivation of recA also resulted in a loss of natural transformation. Overall, the data indicate that C. jejuni has multiple functional DNA repair systems that may protect against DNA damage and limit the generation of genetic diversity. On the other hand, the apparent absence of a functional MMR pathway may enhance the frequency of on-and-off switching of phase variable genes typical for C. jejuni and may contribute to the genetic heterogeneity of the C. jejuni population.The gram-negative, microaerophilic bacterium Campylobacter jejuni is one of the most frequent causes of human bacterial gastroenteritis worldwide (7). Infections with C. jejuni are also associated with the development of a paralyzing neuropathy, the Guillain-Barré syndrome (64). C. jejuni can be isolated from various sources, including the chicken intestine and surface water (38). At the population level, C. jejuni is genetically highly diverse (11, 60, 62), which may facilitate bacterial environmental adaptation. Genetic diversity in C. jejuni is generated via horizontal gene transfer (9, 10, 51), intragenomic rearrangements (9), and the presence of numerous stretches of nucleotide repeats that are prone to mispairing during DNA replication (26, 41, 42, 46). In addition, the genomic DNA is probably subject to various types of damage caused by a range of endogenous and environmental factors which may cause single- or double-strand breaks, nucleotide modifications, abasic sites, bulky adducts, and mismatches (14). Virtually all bacteria have evolved more or less sophisticated DNA repair mechanisms to limit the detrimental effects of DNA damage and to maintain the structure and genetic integrity of their DNA (16). The importance of DNA repair for the survival and genetic diversity of C. jejuni, however, is still largely unknown.Bacterial DNA repair mechanisms can be divided into three classes, namely, direct repair, excision repair, and recombinational repair (14). Direct repair involves the reversal of the mutagenic event without the need for synthesis of a new phosphodiester bond. During excision repair, DNA abnormalities are removed and repaired using the intact strand as a template. Recombinational repair involves the reversal of DNA abnormalities via homologous recombination. In contrast to direct repair, DNA repair by excision and recombination does require synthesis of new phosphodiester bonds (56). The focus of the current work is on the presence of the latter two repair mechanisms in C. jejuni.Most knowledge of excision and recombinational DNA repair processes comes from studies of Escherichia coli. In E. coli, methyl-directed mismatch repair (MMR) is operating at the level of excision repair. MMR repairs replication errors that arise from misincorporations (mismatches) and strand slippage (frameshift errors). In addition, MMR inhibits recombination between homologous sequences (47). During MMR, MutS recognizes and binds to replication errors and, together with MutL, activates MutH. This protein cleaves the unmethylated daughter strand at hemimethylated GATC sequences. Part of the daughter strand with the mutation is excised by single-strand nucleases, and the gap is repaired (25, 37). A second excision repair mechanism of E. coli is nucleotide excision repair (NER). NER detects and repairs conformational changes present in DNA. Major components of the NER pathway are the UvrABC proteins. The UvrA and UvrB proteins form the damage recognition complex. After binding to the DNA, UvrB forms a stable complex with the damaged DNA (UvrB-DNA) and UvrA dissociates. UvrC binds to the UvrB-DNA complex, and incisions are made, thereby excising the damaged DNA as a 12- or 13-nucleotide-long oligomer. The resulting gap is repaired using the undamaged strand as a template (55). The third excision repair mechanism of E. coli is base excision repair (BER). This system detects and repairs modified bases. Different glycosylases, such as the uracil-DNA glycosylase Ung, are involved in the recognition of specific DNA alterations. These enzymes remove damaged bases from the DNA by cleavage of N-glycosylic bonds, leaving an apurinic or apyrimidinic site (AP site). An AP endonuclease (XthA) is necessary for cleavage of the phosphodiester bond, and the remaining deoxyribose phosphate moiety is removed by a deoxyribose phosphodiesterase (RecJ) after which the gap in the DNA is repaired (49). The recombinational repair mechanism of E. coli is involved in the repair of stalled or collapsed replication forks caused by conformational changes resulting from unrepaired mutations (8). When nicks or other lesions are present in the DNA, E. coli RecA binds to the damaged DNA and catalyzes recombinational repair via double-strand break repair or daughter strand gap repair (35).The subset and specificity of DNA repair mechanisms differ between species (1). The goal of this study was to decipher the presence and functionality of three excision repair mechanisms (MMR, NER, and BER) and RecA-dependent recombinational repair in C. jejuni. Using a set of genetically defined mutants, we present evidence that recombinational repair and the NER system, but not the MMR pathway, are functional in C. jejuni. In addition, proof was obtained that C. jejuni has a functional Ung protein involved in the BER pathway.