The future direction of cholesterol-lowering therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Observational studies suggest a continuous positive relationship between vascular risk and cholesterol without any lower threshold level. We review recent and future clinical trials addressing the question of optimal treatment goals for cholesterol reduction and how these relate to present guidelines. With increasing focus on greater cholesterol reduction, new approaches to lipid-lowering therapy are being developed; we discuss some of these agents including the new statin, rosuvastatin and novel cholesterol transport inhibitors such as ezetimibe. RECENT FINDINGS: The Heart Protection Study demonstrated that LDL cholesterol reduction to levels as low as 1.7 mmol/l was associated with significant clinical benefit in a wide range of high-risk individuals, irrespective of baseline cholesterol levels, with no apparent threshold level for LDL cholesterol with respect to cardiovascular risk. The Heart Protection Study also demonstrated that the benefits of LDL cholesterol reduction extend into peripheral vascular disease and cerebrovascular disease prevention and suggest that the most recent National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines, with LDL cholesterol targets of 2.6 mmol/l, may result in undertreatment of a large number of patients. Various large end-point trials, including Treating to New Targets and Study of Effectiveness of Additional Reductions in Cholesterol and Homocysteine will attempt to further address the issue of optimal LDL cholesterol reduction. New therapies are being developed to meet the challenge of more intensive cholesterol lowering. Rosuvastatin is a potent, hydrophilic enantiomeric statin producing reductions in LDL cholesterol of 40-69% over its dose range of 5-80 mg. Ezetimibe is a selective cholesterol absorption inhibitor, with a site of action at the intestinal epithelium. Optimum reductions in LDL cholesterol of up to 25 and 60% reduction in chylomicron cholesterol content are seen with a 10-mg dose. SUMMARY: Evidence is accumulating supporting the safety and benefits of aggressive cholesterol reduction, with no apparent threshold for LDL cholesterol. New therapies will aid in achieving lower cholesterol levels and the use of combination therapies targeting different aspects of cholesterol metabolism may produce additional benefits. Outcome studies are awaited to further address these issues.     

Statin therapy for prevention and treatment of acute and chronic cardiovascular disease: update on recent trials and metaanalyses

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To summarize the evidence from recent clinical trials and metaanalyses on the efficacy of statin therapy to reduce death, myocardial infarction and stroke, and to review the effects of statins in patients with low LDL cholesterol, diabetes, end-stage renal disease, and acute coronary syndrome. RECENT FINDINGS: In large metaanalyses of randomized controlled trials relative risk reductions from statins compared with placebo for patients with manifest or with risk factors for coronary artery disease were 13% for overall mortality, 26% for fatal and nonfatal myocardial infarction, and 18% for fatal and nonfatal stroke. Evidence from large trials suggests that patients with type II diabetes compared with patients without diabetes have similar risk reductions from statins for cardiovascular events, but this benefit is not seen in patients with diabetes and end-stage renal disease. In patients with acute coronary syndrome, early treatment with high-dose atorvastatin reduces cardiovascular morbidity after the first 4 months following the event, but the impact on mortality endpoints remains less clear. Results from recent trials in patients with stable coronary artery disease or type II diabetes suggest that statins provide benefit at considerable low LDL cholesterol levels. Therefore, target values for LDL cholesterol of less than 1.8 mmol/l (<70 mg/dl) should be considered for all patients with coronary artery disease or equivalent coronary risk. SUMMARY: For patients at high risk of coronary artery disease there is growing evidence for the concept of 'the lower, the better' regarding LDL cholesterol levels. Ongoing trials are further investigating the safety of lower target values in patients at various risk of coronary artery disease.     

A strategy to reduce cardiovascular disease by more than 80%

Objectives To determine the combination of drugs and vitamins, and their doses, for use in a single daily pill to achieve a large effect in preventing cardiovascular disease with minimal adverse effects. The strategy was to simultaneously reduce four cardiovascular risk factors (low density lipoprotein cholesterol, blood pressure, serum homocysteine, and platelet function) regardless of pretreatment levels.Design We quantified the efficacy and adverse effects of the proposed formulation from published meta-analyses of randomised trials and cohort studies and a meta-analysis of 15 trials of low dose (50-125 mg/day) aspirin.Outcome measures Proportional reduction in ischaemic heart disease (IHD) events and strokes; life years gained; and prevalence of adverse effects.Results The formulation which met our objectives was: a statin (for example, atorvastatin (daily dose 10 mg) or simvastatin (40 mg)); three blood pressure lowering drugs (for example, a thiazide, a β blocker, and an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor), each at half standard dose; folic acid (0.8 mg); and aspirin (75 mg). We estimate that the combination (which we call the Polypill) reduces IHD events by 88% (95% confidence interval 84% to 91%) and stroke by 80% (71% to 87%). One third of people taking this pill from age 55 would benefit, gaining on average about 11 years of life free from an IHD event or stroke. Summing the adverse effects of the components observed in randomised trials shows that the Polypill would cause symptoms in 8-15% of people (depending on the precise formulation).Conclusion The Polypill strategy could largely prevent heart attacks and stroke if taken by everyone aged 55 and older and everyone with existing cardiovascular disease. It would be acceptably safe and with widespread use would have a greater impact on the prevention of disease in the Western world than any other single intervention.     

Role of lipid-modifying therapy in the prevention of initial and recurrent stroke

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To establish the role of cholesterol-modifying therapy in stroke prevention. RECENT FINDINGS: Population-based observational cohort studies show a variable weak positive relationship between increasing plasma total cholesterol concentrations and an increasing risk of ischaemic stroke, which is partly offset by a weaker negative association between decreasing total cholesterol concentrations and an increasing risk of with haemorrhagic stroke. However, randomized controlled trials show unequivocally that lowering plasma total cholesterol by approximately 1.2 mmol/l (and LDL-cholesterol by 1.0 mmol/l) is associated with a reduced relative risk of stroke and other serious vascular events by at least a quarter, and probably a third, without any increase in haemorrhagic stroke, in a wide range of men and women (including individuals with previous stroke). The proportional reduction in stroke risk is consistent, irrespective of the patient's age, baseline plasma cholesterol concentration, and absolute risk of stroke (although perhaps less in very low-risk individuals), but is increased with greater degrees of cholesterol lowering (15% or more), and thus with statin medications, which are more potent than non-statin interventions in lowering cholesterol levels. The absolute reduction in stroke risk achieved by statins is greatest among individuals at highest risk of stroke. Preliminary evidence suggests that lowering total cholesterol levels by diet may be an effective adjunctive therapy to statins, and raising plasma HDL-cholesterol concentrations among patients with coronary heart disease and low HDL-cholesterol levels ( 1 mmol/l) by means of gemfibrozil may also effectively prevent stroke. SUMMARY: Statin drugs are effective and safe in preventing initial and recurrent stroke. However, because they are costly, they should probably be restricted to individuals with an annual risk of stroke and other serious vascular events of 3% or greater, and possibly as low as 1.5%, because routine monitoring of plasma cholesterol, and liver and muscle enzyme concentrations is probably no longer necessary.     

Perspectives from the Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial--Lipid Lowering Trial and the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial--Lipid Lowering Arm

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The design, process and outcomes are compared between two large clinical trials of LDL cholesterol reduction with statin treatment in patients with known high blood pressure. This new information is placed in the context of previous clinical trials of cholesterol reduction, which have provided analyses of sub-groups with high blood pressure. RECENT FINDINGS: The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial failed to find a significant reduction of total mortality (primary endpoint), cardiovascular mortality or major cardiovascular events. This differed sharply from the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial, Lipid Lowering Arm, which was stopped before the planned termination due to a marked reduction (36%) in coronary death or myocardial infarction (primary endpoint). This trial also found significant reductions in stroke (27%) and separately, all major vascular events (21%). The two studies were similar in that they each contained over 10 000 participants with documented high blood pressure requiring drug therapy and they both used a fixed dose of a single statin. Pravastatin (40 mg/day) was used in the former and atorvastatin 10 mg/day in the latter. The major difference was that the control group in the Anglo-Scandinavian trial was treated with placebo with a double blind design whereas antihypertensive and lipid-lowering trial was open label with controls receiving usual care. SUMMARY: The benefit of achieving and maintaining significant LDL cholesterol reduction in patients with high blood pressure was convincingly demonstrated in the Anglo-Scandinavian trial. The Antihypertensive and Lipid-Lowering Treatment to Prevent Heart Attack Trial failed to achieve similar success due to use of a less effective drug and loss of the differential effect with increasing statin treatment in the usual care control group.     

Hydrogenation alternatives: effects of trans fatty acids and stearic acid versus linoleic acid on serum lipids and lipoproteins in humans.

The objective of this study was to compare the effects of linoleic acid (cis,cis-C18:2(n-6)) and its hydrogenation products elaidic (trans-C18:1(n-9)) and stearic acid (C18:0) on serum lipoprotein levels in humans. Twenty-six men and 30 women, all normolipemic and apparently healthy, completed the trial. Three experimental diets were supplied to every subject for 3 weeks each, in random order (multiple cross-over). The Linoleate-diet provided 12.0% of total energy intake as linoleic acid, 2.8% as stearic acid, and 0.1% as trans fatty acids. The Stearate-diet supplied 3.9 energy % as linoleic acid, 11.8% stearic acid, and 0.3% trans fatty acids. The Trans-diet provided 3.8 energy % as linoleic acid, 3.0% stearic acid, and 7.7% as monounsaturated trans fatty acids, largely elaidic acid (trans-C18:1(n-9)). Other nutrients were constant. Fasting blood was sampled at the end of each dietary period. Mean (+/- SD) serum LDL cholesterol was 109 +/- 24 mg/dl (2.83 +/- 0.63 mmol/l) on the Linoleate-diet. It rose to 116 +/- 27 mg/dl (3.00 +/- 0.71 mmol/l) on the Stearate-diet (change, 7 mg/dl or 0.17 mmol/l, P = 0.0008) and to 119 +/- 25 mg/dl (3.07 +/- 0.65 mmol/l) on the Trans-diet (change, 9 mg/dl or 0.24 mmol/l, P less than 0.0001). High density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol decreased by 2 mg/dl (0.06 mmol/l, P less than 0.0001) on the Stearate-diet and by 4 mg/dl (0.10 mmol/l, P less than 0.0001) on the Trans-diet, both relative to linoleic acid. Our findings show that 7.7% of energy (mean, 24 g/day) of trans fatty acids in the diet significantly lowered HDL cholesterol and raised LDL cholesterol relative to linoleic acid. Combination with earlier results (Mensink, R. P., and M. B. Katan. 1990. N. Engl. J. Med. 323: 439-445) suggests a linear dose-response relation. Replacement of linoleic acid by stearic acid also caused somewhat lower HDL cholesterol and higher LDL cholesterol levels. Hydrogenation of linoleic acid to either stearic or trans fatty acids produces fatty acids that may increase LDL and decrease HDL cholesterol relative to linoleic acid itself.     

The lipid-lowering effect of ezetimibe in pure vegetarians

Results of previous studies have shown that ezetimibe (10 mg/day) reduces LDL cholesterol in patients with mild hypercholesterolemia on a normal-cholesterol diet (dietary intake of 200-500 mg/day) by 16-22%. However, the LDL cholesterol-lowering effect of ezetimibe in subjects with an extremely low dietary cholesterol intake (vegetarians) has not been studied. We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-phase crossover study in 18 healthy pure vegetarians to assess the effect of ezetimibe (10 mg/day) on plasma lipids, cholesterol absorption, and its synthesis. Treatment periods lasted 2 weeks each, with an intervening 2 week washout period. Fractional cholesterol absorption was determined using the continuous dual stable isotope feeding method. Mean dietary cholesterol intake in the pure vegetarians was extremely low and averaged 29.4 +/- 16.8 and 31.4 +/- 14.4 mg/day during the placebo and ezetimibe administration phases, respectively. Fractional cholesterol absorption during the placebo phase was 48.2 +/- 8.2% and was decreased by 58% during ezetimibe treatment to 20.2 +/- 6.2% (P < 0.001). This change in intestinal cholesterol absorption was followed by a significant reduction in LDL cholesterol of 17.3%. In individuals with extremely low dietary cholesterol intake, treatment with ezetimibe (10 mg/day) leads to a significant reduction of cholesterol absorption and a clinically relevant decrease of plasma LDL cholesterol, comparable to that of subjects with a normal dietary cholesterol intake. Thus, the lipid-lowering effect of ezetimibe is mediated mainly through a reduction of the absorption of endogenous (biliary) cholesterol.     

Low-density lipoprotein catabolism in WHHL rabbits after partial ileal bypass surgery

The effect of partial ileal bypass surgery (PIB) on lipoprotein concentrations and compositions and on the catabolism of low-density lipoproteins (LDL) was studied in Watanabe heritable hyperlipidemic (WHHL) rabbits. After PIB, total serum cholesterol was 65% lower (6.22 +/- 1.58 vs. 17.24 +/- 3.22 mmol/l) and LDL cholesterol 81% lower (2.02 +/- 0.95 vs. 10.90 +/- 3.60 mmol/l) than in control WHHL rabbits; cholesteryl esters, expressed as percentage of mass, were 55% lower in the very-low and intermediate-density lipoprotein (VLDL + IDL) fractions, and 45% lower in LDL, whereas triacylglycerols were 89% higher in VLDL + IDL and 121% higher in LDL. The fractional catabolic rate (FCR) of LDL protein (apoLDL) from operated animals was 10% higher than that from controls in all animals (0.55 +/- 0.10 vs. 0.50 +/- 0.10 pools/day; P less than 0.01). The FCR of autologous apoLDL in PIB rabbits was 50% higher than that of autologous apoLDL in control rabbits (0.63 +/- 0.05 vs. 0.42 +/- 0.06 pools/day); this was not caused by induction of receptor-mediated clearance of LDL. The production rate of apoLDL after PIB in PIB rabbits was 50% lower compared to control apoLDL in controls (26.0 +/- 6.7 vs. 51.7 +/- 16.4 mg/kg per day). We conclude that PIB lowers LDL cholesterol in WHHL rabbits by a decreased production of LDL, by an increased non-specific clearance of LDL and by compositional changes, which lead to LDL particles containing less cholesterol.     

Effect of statins in stroke prevention

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This paper reviews recent studies into the outcomes of clinical trials in which statin therapy has been used in the prevention and treatment of strokes. RECENT DEVELOPMENTS: Epidemiologic studies found no or little association between blood cholesterol levels and stroke. Randomized trials have confirmed that LDL lowering decreased the risk of stroke, in diabetic or hypertensive patients with 'normal' LDL cholesterol at baseline, and in patients with coronary artery disease, with respectively 48, 27 and 25% reduction in stroke incidence. A meta-analysis of trials showed that the greater the LDL cholesterol reduction, the greater the intima-media thickness and stroke risk reductions. Even if statins also have 'pleiotropic' effects, their main action seems to be through LDL reduction. The Heart Protection Study only included strokes that occurred 4.6 years before--a time when the stroke event rate is low and the cardiac event rate is high, and so may not have had the power to find a true effect of LDL cholesterol lowering in preventing recurrent stroke. The Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) trial may give a definite answer because SPARCL investigators included 4732 patients with brain infarction or transient ischemic attacks and no history of myocardial infarction within 6 months of their stroke event, at a time when the expected stroke rate is very high and the myocardial infarction rate is very low. The results should be announced by mid-2006. SUMMARY: The positive effect of statins on stroke observed in trials of patients with coronary heart disease depended mainly on between-group LDL reduction, but other mechanisms could be involved. Though effective in prevention of major coronary events after a first stroke, statins have not yet been proven effective in prevention of recurrent stroke.     

Dietary lipids and blood cholesterol: quantitative meta-analysis of metabolic ward studies.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the quantitative importance of dietary fatty acids and dietary cholesterol to blood concentrations of total, low density lipoprotein, and high density lipoprotein cholesterol. DESIGN: Meta-analysis of metabolic ward studies of solid food diets in healthy volunteers. SUBJECTS: 395 dietary experiments (median duration 1 month) among 129 groups of individuals. RESULTS: Isocaloric replacement of saturated fats by complex carbohydrates for 10% of dietary calories resulted in blood total cholesterol falling by 0.52 (SE 0.03) mmol/l and low density lipoprotein cholesterol falling by 0.36 (0.05) mmol/l. Isocaloric replacement of complex carbohydrates by polyunsaturated fats for 5% of dietary calories resulted in total cholesterol falling by a further 0.13 (0.02) mmol/l and low density lipoprotein cholesterol falling by 0.11 (0.02) mmol/l. Similar replacement of carbohydrates by monounsaturated fats produced no significant effect on total or low density lipoprotein cholesterol. Avoiding 200 mg/day dietary cholesterol further decreased blood total cholesterol by 0.13 (0.02) mmol/l and low density lipoprotein cholesterol by 0.10 (0.02) mmol/l. CONCLUSIONS: In typical British diets replacing 60% of saturated fats by other fats and avoiding 60% of dietary cholesterol would reduce blood total cholesterol by about 0.8 mmol/l (that is, by 10-15%), with four fifths of this reduction being in low density lipoprotein cholesterol.     

Human hepatic low-density lipoprotein receptors: associations of receptor activities in vitro with plasma lipid and apolipoprotein concentrations in vivo

The relationships of plasma lipid and apolipoprotein (apo) concentrations to hepatic low-density lipoprotein (LDL) receptor activity were examined in 21 subjects (16 females, 5 males), who were undergoing laparotomy for non-neoplastic disease (cholecystectomy in 16). None had familial hypercholesterolemia, or renal, endocrine or hepatic disease. Ages were 37-77 years (mean, 58 years), plasma cholesterol concentrations 4.09-6.72 mmol/l (5.38) and plasma triacylglycerol concentrations 0.75-2.35 mmol/l (1.36). Receptor activity was quantified in vitro as the total saturable binding and EDTA-suppressible binding (representing apoB,E receptors) of 125I-labelled human LDL (15 micrograms protein/ml) by liver homogenate at 37 degrees C. There were no significant differences between men and women in 125I-labeled LDL binding. In the pooled data, EDTA-suppressible binding averaged 50 ng 125I-LDL protein/mg cell protein (S.D., 15). Total saturable binding averaged 2-fold greater (mean, 101 ng/mg; S.D., 32). Plasma cholesterol, LDL cholesterol and apoB concentrations were negative functions of both EDTA-suppressible binding and total saturable binding, but the correlations with EDTA-suppressible binding were stronger (cholesterol: r = -0.59, P less than 0.01; LDL cholesterol: r = -0.48, P less than 0.05; apoB: r = -0.61, P less than 0.01). Plasma triacylglycerol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and apoA-I concentrations were not related to either measure of receptor activity. These results provide evidence that the activity of apoB,E receptors in the liver is a major determinant of the plasma LDL concentration in middle-aged and elderly humans.     

Effects of pravastatin and cholestyramine on products of the mevalonate pathway in familial hypercholesterolemia

Patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (n = 12) were treated either with pravastatin, a specific inhibitor of HMG-CoA reductase, or cholestyramine, followed by a period of combined treatment with both drugs. Initially, these patients had increased serum levels of low density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (8.77 +/- 0.48 mmol/l; SEM), lathosterol (5.32 +/- 0.60 mg/l), and ubiquinone (0.76 +/- 0.09 mg/l), while the serum dolichol concentration was in the normal range. Cholestyramine treatment (n = 6) decreased the levels of LDL cholesterol (-32%) and increased lathosterol (+125%), but did not change dolichol or ubiquinone levels in a significant manner. Pravastatin treatment (n = 6) decreased LDL cholesterol (-27%), lathosterol (-46%), and ubiquinone (-29%). In this case, the amount of dolichol in serum also showed a small but statistically insignificant decrease (-16%) after 12 weeks of treatment. Combined treatment with cholestyramine and pravastatin (n = 6) resulted in changes that were similar to, but less pronounced than, those observed during pravastatin treatment alone. In no case was the ratio between ubiquinone and LDL cholesterol reduced. Possible effects on hepatic cholesterol, ubiquinone, and dolichol concentrations were studied in untreated (n = 2), cholestyramine-treated (n = 2), and pravastatin-treated (n = 4) gallstone patients and no consistent changes could be observed. The results indicate that treatment with pravastatin in familial hypercholesterolemia decreases serum ubiquinone levels in proportion to the reduction in LDL cholesterol.     

Inhibition of both the apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter and HMG-CoA reductase markedly enhances the clearance of LDL apoB

Discovery of the ileal apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT) permitted development of specific inhibitors of bile acid reabsorption, potentially a new class of cholesterol-lowering agents. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that combining the novel ASBT inhibitor, SC-435, with the HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor, atorvastatin, would potentiate reductions in LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) and LDL apolipoprotein B (apoB). ApoB kinetic studies were performed in miniature pigs fed a typical human diet and treated with the combination of SC-435 (5 mg/kg/day) plus atorvastatin (3 mg/kg/day) (SC-435+A) or a placebo. SC-435+A decreased plasma total cholesterol by 23% and LDL-C by 40%. Multicompartmental analysis (SAAM II) demonstrated that LDL apoB significantly decreased by 35% due primarily to a 45% increase in the LDL apoB fractional catabolic rate (FCR). SC-435+A significantly decreased hepatic concentrations of free cholesterol and cholesteryl ester, and increased hepatic LDL receptor mRNA consequent to increased cholesterol 7alpha-hydroxylase expression and activity. In comparison, SC-435 (10 mg/kg/day) monotherapy decreased LDL apoB by 10% due entirely to an 18% increase in LDL apoB FCR, whereas atorvastatin monotherapy (3 mg/kg/day) decreased LDL apoB by 30% due primarily to a 22% reduction in LDL apoB production. We conclude that SC-435+A potentiates the reduction of LDL-C and LDL apoB due to complementary mechanisms of action.     

Statin therapy and stroke prevention: what was known, what is new and what is next?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Randomized trials have shown that statins may reduce the risk of primary stroke. There is no evidence however that statins can reduce recurrent stroke incidence. RECENT FINDINGS: In the SPARCL trial, patients with a recent stroke or transient ischemic attack randomized to atorvastatin 80 mg/day had a significant 16% relative risk reduction of stroke, and a 35% reduction in major coronary events compared with placebo. This was obtained despite 25% of the placebo arm patients receiving a commercially-available statin outside of the trial. Post-hoc analysis used blinded LDL-cholesterol measurements as a marker of adherence to lipid-lowering therapy. Compared with the group with no change or an increase in LDL-cholesterol (the group adherent to placebo or not taking a statin), the group with over 50% reduction in LDL-cholesterol had a significant 31% reduction in stroke. The next step is to define whether achieving LDL-cholesterol below 70 mg/dl is better than a standard dose of statin (LDL around 100-110 mg/dl) in the secondary prevention of stroke. SUMMARY: Statins are effective in reducing both first-ever and recurrent stroke, and this effect seems driven by the extent of LDL-cholesterol lowering.     

Inhibition of cholesterol absorption by the combination of dietary plant sterols and ezetimibe: effects on plasma lipid levels

Consumption of plant sterols and treatment with ezetimibe both reduce cholesterol absorption in the intestine. However, the mechanism of action differs between the two treatments, and the consequences of combination treatment are unknown. Therefore, we performed a double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover study for the plant sterol component with open-label ezetimibe treatment. Forty mildly hypercholesterolemic subjects were randomized to the following treatments for 4 weeks each: 10 mg/day ezetimibe combined with 25 g/day control spread; 10 mg/day ezetimibe combined with 25 g/day spread containing 2.0 g of plant sterols; 25 g/day spread containing 2.0 g of plant sterols; and placebo treatment consisting of 25 g/day control spread. Combination treatment of plant sterols and ezetimibe reduced low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by 1.06 mmol/l (25.2%; P < 0.001) compared with 0.23 mmol/l (4.7%; P = 0.006) with plant sterols and 0.94 mmol/l (22.2%; P < 0.001) with ezetimibe monotherapy. LDL-C reduction conferred by the combination treatment did not differ significantly from ezetimibe monotherapy (-0.12 mmol/l or -3.5%; P = 0.13). Additionally, the plasma lathosterol-to-cholesterol ratio increased with all treatments. Sitosterol and campesterol ratios increased after plant sterol treatment and decreased upon ezetimibe and combination therapy. Our results indicate that the combination of plant sterols and ezetimibe has no therapeutic benefit over ezetimibe monotherapy in subjects with mild hypercholesterolemia.     

High prevalence of low HDL cholesterol concentrations and mixed hyperlipidemia in a Mexican nationwide survey

The prevalence of lipid abnormalities revealed in a survey done in 417 Mexican cities is described. Information was obtained on 15,607 subjects, aged 20 to 69 years. In this report, only samples obtained after a 9- to 12-h fast were included (2,256 cases: 953 men and 1,303 women). The population is representative of Mexican urban adults. Mean lipid concentrations were: cholesterol, 4.80 mmol/l; triglycerides, 2.39 mmol/l; HDL cholesterol, 1.00 mmol/l; and LDL cholesterol, 3.06 mmol/l. The most prevalent abnormality was HDL cholesterol below 0.9 mmol/l (46.2% for men and 28.7% for women). Hypertriglyceridemia (>2.26 mmol/l) was the second most prevalent abnormality (24.3%). Severe hypertriglyceridemia (>11.2 mmol/l) was observed in 0.42% of the population. Increased LDL cholesterol (> or =4.21 mmol/l) was observed in 11.2% of the sample. Half of the hypertriglyceridemic subjects had a mixed dyslipidemia or low HDL cholesterol. More than 50% of the low HDL cholesterol cases were not related to hypertriglyceridemia. Insulin resistance was found in 59% of them. In conclusion, the prevalence of hypoalphalipoproteinemia and other forms of dyslipidemia in Mexican adults is very high and it is among the highest previously reported worldwide.     

By how much and how quickly does reduction in serum cholesterol concentration lower risk of ischaemic heart disease?

OBJECTIVE--To estimate by how much and how quickly a given reduction in serum cholesterol concentration will reduce the risk of ischaemic heart disease. DESIGN--Data on the incidence of ischaemic heart disease and serum cholesterol concentration were analysed from 10 prospective (cohort) studies, three international studies in different communities, and 28 randomised controlled trials (with mortality data analysed according to allocated treatment to ensure the avoidance of bias). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE--Decrease in incidence of ischaemic heart disease or mortality for a 0.6 mmol/l (about 10%) decrease in serum cholesterol concentration. RESULTS--For men results from the cohort studies showed that a decrease of serum cholesterol concentration of 0.6 mmol/l (about 10%) was associated with a decrease in incidence of ischaemic heart disease of 54% at age 40 years, 39% at age 50, 27% at 60, 20% at 70, and 19% at 80. The combined estimate from the three international studies (for ages 55-64 years) was 38% (95% confidence interval 33% to 42%), somewhat greater than the cohort study estimate of 27%. The reductions in incidence of ischaemic heart disease in the randomised trials (for ages 55-64 years) were 7% (0 to 14%) in the first two years, 22% (15% to 28%) from 2.1-5 years, and 25% (15% to 35%) after five years, the last estimate being close to the estimate of 27% for the long term reduction from the cohort studies. The data for women are limited but indicate a similar effect. CONCLUSIONS--The results from the cohort studies, international comparisons, and clinical trials are remarkably consistent. The cohort studies, based on half a million men and 18,000 ischaemic heart disease events, estimate that a long term reduction in serum cholesterol concentration of 0.6 mmol/l (10%), which can be achieved by moderate dietary change, lowers the risk of ischaemic heart disease by 50% at age 40, falling to 20% at age 70. The randomised trials, based on 45,000 men and 4000 ischaemic heart disease events show that the full effect of the reduction in risk is achieved by five years.     

Rosuvastatin improves impaired endothelial function,lowers high sensitivity CRP,complement and immuncomplex production in patients with systemic sclerosis - a prospective case-series study

Introduction

We studied the effect of rosuvastatin on endothelial and macrovascular function, cardiovascular risk factors and the complement pathway in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc).

Methods

Altogether 28 patients with SSc underwent laboratory and complex vascular assessments before and after six months of 20 mg rosuvastatin treatment. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery, as well as carotid artery intima-media thickness (ccIMT), carotid-femoral and aorto-femoral pulse wave-velocity (PWV) were analyzed by ECG-synchronized ultrasound. Ankle-brachial index (ABI) was determined by Doppler, and forearm skin microcirculation was assessed by Laser Doppler perfusion monitoring.

Results

Brachial artery FMD significantly improved upon rosuvastatin therapy (2.2% ± 3.3% before versus 5.7% ± 3.9% after treatment, P = 0.0002). With regard to patient subsets, FMD significantly improved in the 21 lcSSc patients (from 2.1% to 5.6%, P = 0.001). In the seven dcSSc patients, we observed a tendency of improvement in FMD (from 3% to 6%, P = 0.25). Changes in PWV, ccIMT and ABI were not significant. Mean triglyceride (1.7 ± 0.97 versus 1.3 ± 0.46 mmol/l, P = 0.0004), total cholesterol (5.3 ± 1.6 mmol/l versus 4.2 ± 1.3 mmol/l, P = 0.0003), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (3.0 ± 1.3 versus 2.2 ± 1.0 mmol/l, P = 0.005) and C-reactive protein levels (CRP) (5.1 ± 5.2 versus 3.4 ± 2.7, P = 0.01) levels significantly decreased after rosuvastatin treatment. Mean C3, C4 and IC levels also decreased significantly as compared to pretreatment values.

Conclusions

Six-month rosuvastatin therapy improves endothelial function and lowers CRP, C3, C4 and IC levels indicating possible favourable effects of this statin on the cardiovascular and immune system in SSc.     

Comparison of rosuvastatin and atorvastatin for lipid lowering in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: results from the URANUS study

Objective

The Use of Rosuvastatin versus Atorvastatin iN type 2 diabetes mellitUS (URANUS) study compared rosuvastatin with atorvastatin for the reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Methods

After a 6-week dietary run-in, patients aged ≥ 18 years with type 2 diabetes and LDL-C ≥ 3.3 mmol/L were randomised to double-blind treatment with rosuvastatin 10 mg (n = 232) or atorvastatin 10 mg (n = 233) for 4 weeks. Doses were then titrated up to a maximum of rosuvastatin 40 mg or atorvastatin 80 mg over 12 weeks to achieve the 1998 European LDL-C goal (<3.0 mmol/L).

Results

Rosuvastatin reduced LDL-C levels significantly more than atorvastatin during the fixed-dose and titration periods (p < 0.0001). Significantly more patients reached the 1998 LDL-C goal with rosuvastatin 10 mg compared with atorvastatin 10 mg at 4 weeks (81% vs 65%, p < 0.001). At 16 weeks, significantly more patients achieved their LDL-C goal with rosuvastatin compared with atorvastatin (94% vs 88%, p < 0.05) and more patients receiving rosuvastatin remained at their starting dose with reduced requirement for dose titration. At 4 weeks, 65% of rosuvastatin patients had reached their 2003 European LDL-C goal (< 2.5 mmol/L), compared with 33% of atorvastatin patients (p < 0.0001). Both treatments were similarly well tolerated with no unexpected safety concerns.

Conclusion

At the start dose and following dose titration, rosuvastatin was significantly more effective than atorvastatin at reducing LDL-C and achieving European LDL-C goals in patients with type 2 diabetes.     

High HbA1c levels correlate with reduced plaque regression during statin treatment in patients with stable coronary artery disease: Results of the coronary atherosclerosis study measuring effects of rosuvastatin using intravascular ultrasound in Japanese subjects (COSMOS)

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The incidence of cardiac events is higher in patients with diabetes than in people without diabetes. The Coronary Atherosclerosis Study Measuring Effects of Rosuvastatin Using Intravascular Ultrasound in Japanese Subjects (COSMOS) demonstrated significant plaque regression in Japanese patients with chronic coronary disease after 76?weeks of rosuvastatin (2.5?mg once daily, up-titrated to a maximum of 20?mg/day to achieve LDL cholesterol <80?mg/dl). METHODS: In this subanalysis of COSMOS, we examined the association between HbA1c and plaque regression in 40 patients with HbA1c ≥6.5% (high group) and 86 patients with HbA1c <6.5% (low group). RESULTS: In multivariate analyses, HbA1c and plaque volume at baseline were major determinants of plaque regression. LDL cholesterol decreased by 37% and 39% in the high and low groups, respectively, while HDL cholesterol increased by 16% and 22%, respectively. The reduction in plaque volume was significantly (p?=?0.04) greater in the low group (from 71.0?±?39.9 to 64.7?±?34.7?mm3) than in the high group (from 74.3?±?34.2 to 71.4?±?32.3?mm3). Vessel volume increased in the high group but not in the low group (change from baseline: +4.2% vs -0.8%, p?=?0.02). Change in plaque volume was significantly correlated with baseline HbA1c. CONCLUSIONS: Despite similar improvements in lipid levels, plaque regression was less pronounced in patients with high HbA1c levels compared with those with low levels. Tight glucose control during statin therapy may enhance plaque regression in patients with stable coronary disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT00329160.