Determinants of chemotactic signal amplification in Escherichia coli

A well-characterized protein phosphorelay mediates Escherichia coli chemotaxis towards the amino acid attractant aspartate. The protein CheY shuttles between flagellar motors and methyl-accepting chemoreceptor (MCP) complexes containing the linker CheW and the kinase CheA. CheA-CheY phosphotransfer generates phospho-CheY, CheY-P. Aspartate triggers smooth swim responses by inactivation of the CheA bound to the target MCP, Tar; but this mechanism alone cannot explain the observed response sensitivity. Here, we used behavioral analysis of mutants deleted for CheZ, a catalyst of CheY-P dephosphorylation, or the methyltransferase CheR and/or the methylesterase CheB to examine the roles of accelerated CheY-P dephosphorylation and MCP methylation in enhancement of the chemotactic response. The extreme motile bias of the mutants was adjusted towards wild-type values, while preserving much of the aspartate response sensitivity by expressing fragments of the MCP, Tsr, that either activate or inhibit CheA. We then measured responses to small jumps of aspartate, generated by flash photolysis of photo-labile precursors. The stimulus-response relation for Delta cheZ mutants overlapped that for the host strains. Delta cheZ excitation response times increased with stimulus size consistent with formation of an occluded CheA state. Thus, neither CheZ-dependent or independent increases in CheY-P dephosphorylation contribute to the excitation response. In Delta cheB Delta cheR or Delta cheR mutants, the dose for a half-maximal response, [Asp](50), was ca 10 microM; but was elevated to 100 microM in Delta cheB mutants. In addition, the stimulus-response relation for these mutants was linear, consistent with stoichiometric inactivation, in contrast to the non-linear relation for wild-type E. coli. These data suggest that response sensitivity is controlled by differential binding of CheR and/or CheB to distinct MCP signaling conformations.     

Excitatory signaling in bacterial probed by caged chemoeffectors.

Chemotactic excitation responses to caged ligand photorelease of rapidly swimming bacteria that reverse (Vibrio alginolyticus) or tumble (Escherichia coli and Salmonella typhimurium) have been measured by computer. Mutants were used to assess the effects of abnormal motility behavior upon signal processing times and test feasibility of kinetic analyses of the signaling pathway in intact bacteria. N-1-(2-Nitrophenyl)ethoxycarbonyl-L-serine and 2-hydroxyphenyl 1-(2-nitrophenyl) ethyl phosphate were synthesized. These compounds are a 'caged' serine and a 'caged' proton and on flash photolysis release serine and protons and attractant and repellent ligands, respectively, for Tsr, the serine receptor. The product quantum yield for serine was 0.65 (+/- 0.05) and the rate of serine release was proportional to [H+] near-neutrality with a rate constant of 17 s-1 at pH 7.0 and 21 degrees C. The product quantum yield for protons was calculated to be 0.095 on 308-nm irradiation but 0.29 (+/- 0.02) on 300-350-nm irradiation, with proton release occurring at > 10(5) s-1. The pH jumps produced were estimated using pH indicators, the pH-dependent decay of the chromophoric aci-nitro intermediate and bioassays. Receptor deletion mutants did not respond to photorelease of the caged ligands. Population responses occurred without measurable latency. Response times increased with decreased stimulus strength. Physiological or genetic perturbation of motor rotation bias leading to increased tumbling reduced response sensitivity but did not affect response times. Exceptions were found. A CheR-CheB mutant strain had normal motility, but reduced response. A CheZ mutant had tumbly motility, reduced sensitivity, and increased response time to attractant, but a normal repellent response. These observations are consistent with current ideas that motor interactions with a single parameter, namely phosphorylated CheY protein, dictate motor response to both attractant and repellent stimuli. Inverse motility motor mutants with extreme rotation bias exhibited the greatest reduction in response sensitivity but, nevertheless, had normal attractant response times. This implies that control of CheY phosphate concentration rather than motor reactions limits responses to attractants.     

Differential activation of Escherichia coli chemoreceptors by blue-light stimuli

Enteric bacteria tumble, swim slowly, and are then paralyzed upon exposure to 390- to 530-nm light. Here, we analyze this complex response in Escherichia coli using standard fluorescence microscope optics for excitation at 440 +/- 5 nm. The slow swimming and paralysis occurred only in dye-containing growth media or buffers. Excitation elicited complete paralysis within a second in 1 muM proflavine dye, implying specific motor damage, but prolonged tumbling in buffer alone. The tumbling half-response times were subsecond for onset but more than a minute for recovery. The response required the chemotaxis signal protein CheY and receptor-dependent activation of its kinase CheA. The study of deletion mutants revealed a specific requirement for either the aerotaxis receptor Aer or the chemoreceptor Tar but not the Tar homolog Tsr. The action spectrum of the wild-type response was consistent with a flavin, but the chromophores remain to be identified. The motile response processed via Aer was sustained, with recovery to either step-up or -down taking more than a minute. The response processed via Tar was transient, recovering on second time scales comparable to chemotactic responses. The response duration and amplitude were dependent on relative expression of Aer, Tar, and Tsr. The main response features were reproduced when each receptor was expressed singly from a plasmid in a receptorless host strain. However, time-resolved motion analysis revealed subtle kinetic differences that reflect the role of receptor cluster interactions in kinase activation-deactivation dynamics.     

Elucidation of a PTS-carbohydrate chemotactic signal pathway in Escherichia coli using a time-resolved behavioral assay

Chemotaxis of Escherichia coli toward phosphotransferase systems (PTSs)-carbohydrates requires phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent PTSs as well as the chemotaxis response regulator CheY and its kinase, CheA. Responses initiated by flash photorelease of a PTS substrates D-glucose and its nonmetabolizable analog methyl alpha-D-glucopyranoside were measured with 33-ms time resolution using computer-assisted motion analysis. This, together with chemotactic mutants, has allowed us to map out and characterize the PTS chemotactic signal pathway. The responses were absent in mutants lacking the general PTS enzymes EI or HPr, elevated in PTS transport mutants, retarded in mutants lacking CheZ, a catalyst of CheY autodephosphorylation, and severely reduced in mutants with impaired methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein (MCP) signaling activity. Response kinetics were comparable to those triggered by MCP attractant ligands over most of the response range, the most rapid being 11.7 +/- 3.1 s-1. The response threshold was <10 nM for glucose. Responses to methyl alpha-D-glucopyranoside had a higher threshold, commensurate with a lower PTS affinity, but were otherwise kinetically indistinguishable. These facts provide evidence for a single pathway in which the PTS chemotactic signal is relayed rapidly to MCP-CheW-CheA signaling complexes that effect subsequent amplification and slower CheY dephosphorylation. The high sensitivity indicates that this signal is generated by transport-induced dephosphorylation of the PTS rather than phosphoenolpyruvate consumption.     

Reconstitution of the bacterial chemotaxis signal transduction system from purified components.

In bacterial chemotaxis, transmembrane receptor proteins detect attractants and repellents in the medium and send intracellular signals that control motility. The cytoplasmic proteins that transduce information from the receptors to the flagellar motor have previously been purified and many of their enzymatic activities have been identified. Here we report the reconstitution of the complete signal transduction system from purified components. The protein kinase, CheA, plays a central role in both the initial excitation response to stimuli as well as subsequent events associated with adaptation. This kinase provides phosphoryl groups to two acceptor proteins, CheY, which interacts with the flagellar motor, and CheB, which demethylates the receptors. The purified aspartate receptor, Tar, reconstituted into phospholipid vesicles, acts in conjunction with an auxiliary protein, CheW, to stimulate the rate of kinase autophosphorylation greater than 10-fold. This stimulation is inhibited by aspartate. The activity of the kinase is increased by increased levels of receptor methylation. This effect provides a mechanism that explains how changes in receptor methylation mediate adaptive responses to attractant and repellant stimuli.     

Roles of cheY and cheZ gene products in controlling flagellar rotation in bacterial chemotaxis of Escherichia coli.

To understand output control in bacterial chemotaxis, we varied the levels of expression of cellular cheY and cheZ genes and found that the overproduction of the corresponding proteins affected Escherichia coli swimming behavior. In the absence of other signal-transducing gene products, CheY overproduction made free-swimming cells tumble more frequently. A plot of the fraction of the population that are tumbling versus the CheY concentration was hyperbolic, with half of the population tumbling at 30 microM (25,000 copies per cell) CheY monomers in the cytosol. Overproduction of aspartate receptor (Tar) by 30-fold had a negligible effect on CheY-induced tumbling, so Tar does not sequester CheY. CheZ overproduction decreased tumbling in all tumbling mutants except certain flaAII(cheC) mutants. In the absence of other chemotaxis gene products, CheZ overproduction inhibited CheY-induced tumbling. Models for CheY as a tumbling signal and CheZ as a smooth-swimming signal to control flagellar rotation are discussed.     

A mechanism for simultaneous sensing of aspartate and maltose by the Tar chemoreceptor of Escherichia coli

The Tar chemoreceptor of Escherichia coli exhibits partial sensory additivity. Tar can mediate simultaneous responses to two disparate ligands, aspartate and substrate-loaded maltose-binding protein (MBP). To investigate how one receptor generates concurrent signals to two stimuli, ligand-binding asymmetry was imposed on the rotationally symmetric Tar homodimer. Mutations causing specific defects in aspartate or maltose chemotaxis were introduced pairwise into plasmid-borne tar genes. The doubly mutated tar genes did not restore aspartate or maltose chemotaxis in a strain containing a chromosomal deletion of tar (Δ tar ). However, when Tar proteins with complementing sets of mutations were co-expressed from compatible plasmids, the resulting heterodimeric receptors enabled Δ tar cells to respond to aspartate or maltose. The effect of one attractant on the response to the other depended on the relative orientations of the functional binding sites for aspartate and MBP. When the sites were in the 'same' orientation, saturating levels of one attractant strongly inhibited chemotaxis to the other. In the 'opposite' orientation, such inhibitory effects were negligible. These data demonstrate that opposing subunits of Tar can transmit signals to aspartate and maltose independently if the ligands are restricted to the 'opposite' binding orientation. When aspartate and MBP bind in the 'same' orientation, they compete for signalling through one subunit. In the wild-type Tar dimer, aspartate and MBP can bind in either the 'same' or the 'opposite' orientation, a freedom that can explain the partial additivity of the aspartate and maltose responses that is seen with tar ⁺ cells.     

Changing the specificity of a bacterial chemoreceptor

The methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins are a family of receptors in bacteria that mediate chemotaxis to diverse signals. To explore the plasticity of these proteins, we have developed a simple method for selecting cells that swim to target attractants. The procedure is based on establishing a diffusive gradient in semi-soft agar plates and does not require that the attractant be metabolized or degraded. We have applied this method to select for variants of the Escherichia coli aspartate receptor, Tar, that have a new or improved response to different amino acids. We found that Tar can be readily mutated to respond to new chemical signals. However, the overall change in specificity depended on the target compound. A Tar variant that could detect cysteic acid still showed a strong sensitivity to aspartate, indicating that the new receptor had a broadened specificity relative to wild-type Tar. Tar variants that responded to phenylalanine or N-methyl aspartate, or that had an increased sensitivity to glutamate showed a strong decrease in their response to aspartate. In at least some of the cases, the maximal level of sensitivity that was obtained could not be attributed solely to substitutions within the binding pocket. The new tar alleles and the techniques described here provide a new approach for exploring the relationship between ligand binding and signal transduction by chemoreceptors and for engineering new receptors for applications in biotechnology.     

The carboxy-terminal portion of the CheA kinase mediates regulation of autophosphorylation by transducer and CheW.

The CheA kinase is a central protein in the signal transduction network that controls chemotaxis in Escherichia coli. CheA receives information from a transmembrane receptor (e.g., Tar) and CheW proteins and relays it to the CheB and CheY proteins. The biochemical activities of CheA proteins truncated at various distances from the carboxy terminus were examined. The carboxy-terminal portion of CheA regulates autophosphorylation in response to environmental signals transmitted through Tar and CheW. The central portion of CheA is required for autophosphorylation and is also presumably involved in dimer formation. The amino-terminal portion of CheA was previously shown to contain the site of autophosphorylation and to be able to transfer the phosphoryl group to CheB and CheY. These studies further delineate three functional domains of the CheA protein.     

Single-Cell E. coli Response to an Instantaneously Applied Chemotactic Signal

In response to an attractant or repellant, an Escherichia coli cell controls the rotational direction of its flagellar motor by a chemotaxis system. When an E. coli cell senses an attractant, a reduction in the intracellular concentration of a chemotaxis protein, phosphorylated CheY (CheY-P), induces counterclockwise (CCW) rotation of the flagellar motor, and this cellular response is thought to occur in several hundred milliseconds. Here, to measure the signaling process occurring inside a single E. coli cell, including the recognition of an attractant by a receptor cluster, the inactivation of histidine kinase CheA, and the diffusion of CheY and CheY-P molecules, we applied a serine stimulus by instantaneous photorelease from a caged compound and examined the cellular response at a temporal resolution of several hundred microseconds. We quantified the clockwise (CW) and CCW durations immediately after the photorelease of serine as the response time and the duration of the response, respectively. The results showed that the response time depended on the distance between the receptor and motor, indicating that the decreased CheY-P concentration induced by serine propagates through the cytoplasm from the receptor-kinase cluster toward the motor with a timing that is explained by the diffusion of CheY and CheY-P molecules. The response time included 240 ms for enzymatic reactions in addition to the time required for diffusion of the signaling molecule. The measured response time and duration of the response also revealed that the E. coli cell senses a similar serine concentration regardless of whether the serine concentration is increasing or decreasing. These detailed quantitative findings increase our understanding of the signal transduction process that occurs inside cells during bacterial chemotaxis.     

Role of threonine residue 154 in ligand recognition of the tar chemoreceptor in Escherichia coli.

The Tar chemoreceptor of Escherichia coli mediates attractant responses to aspartate, maltose, and phenol, repellent responses to Ni2+ and Co2+, and thermoresponses. To understand the role of threonine residue 154, which is located in the ligand-binding domain of Tar, we replaced the residue with serine, isoleucine, and proline by site-directed mutagenesis. The replacements caused reductions in aspartate sensing but had only a small effect on maltose sensing and almost no effect on phenol sensing, repellent sensing, and thermosensing. These results indicate that Thr-154 of Tar is rather specifically involved in aspartate sensing. The reductions in the response threshold for aspartate by the replacements with serine, isoleucine, and proline were less than 1, about 2, and more than 5 orders of magnitude, respectively. When the corresponding threonine residue in the Tsr chemoreceptor was replaced with the same amino acids, roughly similar reductions in the response threshold for serine resulted. Thus, these threonine residues seem to have a common role in detecting the aspartate and serine attractant families. A mechanism by which these chemoreceptors detect the amino acid attractants is discussed.     

Single-Cell E.?coli Response to an Instantaneously Applied Chemotactic Signal

In response to an attractant or repellant, an Escherichia coli cell controls the rotational direction of its flagellar motor by a chemotaxis system. When an E. coli cell senses an attractant, a reduction in the intracellular concentration of a chemotaxis protein, phosphorylated CheY (CheY-P), induces counterclockwise (CCW) rotation of the flagellar motor, and this cellular response is thought to occur in several hundred milliseconds. Here, to measure the signaling process occurring inside a single E. coli cell, including the recognition of an attractant by a receptor cluster, the inactivation of histidine kinase CheA, and the diffusion of CheY and CheY-P molecules, we applied a serine stimulus by instantaneous photorelease from a caged compound and examined the cellular response at a temporal resolution of several hundred microseconds. We quantified the clockwise (CW) and CCW durations immediately after the photorelease of serine as the response time and the duration of the response, respectively. The results showed that the response time depended on the distance between the receptor and motor, indicating that the decreased CheY-P concentration induced by serine propagates through the cytoplasm from the receptor-kinase cluster toward the motor with a timing that is explained by the diffusion of CheY and CheY-P molecules. The response time included 240 ms for enzymatic reactions in addition to the time required for diffusion of the signaling molecule. The measured response time and duration of the response also revealed that the E. coli cell senses a similar serine concentration regardless of whether the serine concentration is increasing or decreasing. These detailed quantitative findings increase our understanding of the signal transduction process that occurs inside cells during bacterial chemotaxis.     

Cooperative signaling among bacterial chemoreceptors

Four chemoreceptors in Escherichia coli mediate responses to chemicals in the environment. The receptors self-associate and localize to the cell poles. This aggregation implies that interactions among receptors are important parameters of signal processing during chemotaxis. We examined this phenomenon using a receptor-coupled in vitro assay of CheA kinase activity. The ability of homogeneous populations of the serine receptor Tsr and the aspartate receptor Tar to stimulate CheA was directly proportional to the ratio of the receptor to total protein in cell membranes up to a fraction of 50%. Membranes containing mixed populations of Tar and Tsr supported an up to 4-fold greater stimulation of CheA than expected on the basis of the contributions of the individual receptors. Peak activity was seen at a Tar:Tsr ratio of 1:4. This synergy was observed only when the two proteins were expressed simultaneously, suggesting that, under our conditions, the fundamental "cooperative receptor unit" is relatively static, even in the absence of CheA and CheW. Finally, we observed that inhibition of receptor-stimulated CheA activity by serine or aspartate required significantly higher concentrations of ligand for membranes containing mixed Tsr and Tar populations than for membranes containing only Tsr (up to 10(2)-fold more serine) or Tar (up to 10(4)-fold more aspartate). Together with recent analyses of the interactions of Tsr and Tar in vivo, our results reveal the emergent properties of mixed receptor populations and emphasize their importance in the integrated signal processing that underlies bacterial chemotaxis.     

Both CheA and CheW are required for reconstitution of chemotactic signaling in Escherichia coli.

If cells of Escherichia coli deleted for genes that specify transducers and all known cytoplasmic chemotaxis proteins are reconstituted with CheA, CheW, and CheY, they spin their flagella alternately clockwise and counterclockwise. If the aspartate receptor also is present, clockwise rotation is suppressed upon addition of aspartate. If either CheA or CheW is absent, the fraction of time that the flagella spin clockwise is reduced and responses to aspartate do not occur.     

Control of bacterial chemotaxis

Bacterial chemotaxis, which has been extensively studied for three decades, is the most prominent model system for signal transduction in bacteria. Chemotaxis is achieved by regulating the direction of flagellar rotation. The regulation is carried out by the chemotaxis protein, CheY. This protein is activated by a stimulus-dependent phosphorylation mediated by an autophosphorylatable kinase (CheA) whose activity is controlled by chemoreceptors. Upon phosphorylation, CheY dissociates from its kinase, binds to the switch at the base of the flagellar motor, and changes the motor rotation from the default direction (counter-clockwise) to clockwise. Phosphorylation may also be involved in terminating the response. Phosphorylated CheY binds to the phosphatase CheZ and modulates its oligomeric state and thereby its dephosphorylating activity. Thus CheY phosphorylation appears to be involved in controlling both the excitation and adaptation mechanisms of bacterial chemotaxis. Additional control sites might be involved in bacterial chemotaxis, e.g. lateral control at the receptor level, control at the motor level, or control by metabolites that link central metabolism with chemotaxis.     

Tar-dependent and -independent pattern formation by Salmonella typhimurium.

When Salmonella typhimurium cells were allowed to swarm on either a minimal or complex semisolid medium, patterns of cell aggregates were formed (depending on the thickness of the medium). No patterns were observed with nonchemotactic mutants. The patterns in a minimal medium were not formed by a mutant in the aspartate receptor for chemotaxis (Tar) or by wild-type cells in the presence of alpha-methyl-D,L-aspartate (an aspartate analog), thus resembling the patterns observed earlier in Escherichia coli (E. O. Budrene and H. C. Berg, Nature [London] 349:630-633, 1991) and S. typhimurium (E. O. Budrene and H. C. Berg, Abstracts of Conference II on Bacterial Locomotion and Signal Transduction, 1993). Distinctively, the patterns in a complex medium had a different morphology and, more importantly, were Tar independent. Furthermore, mutations in any one of the genes encoding the methyl-accepting chemotaxis receptors (tsr, tar, trg, or tcp) did not prevent the pattern formation. Addition of saturating concentrations of the ligands of these receptors to wild-type cells did not prevent the pattern formation as well. A tar tsr tcp triple mutant also formed the patterns. Similar results (no negative effect on pattern formation) were obtained with a ptsI mutant (defective in chemotaxis mediated by the phosphoenolpyruvate-dependent carbohydrate:phosphotransferase system [PTS]) and with addition of mannitol (a PTS ligand) to wild-type cells. It therefore appears that at least two different pathways are involved in the patterns formed by S. typhimurium: Tar dependent and Tar independent. Like the Tar-dependent patterns observed by Budrene and Berg, the Tar-independent patterns could be triggered by H(2)O(2), suggesting that both pathways of pattern formation may be triggered by oxidative stress.     

Change in direction of flagellar rotation in Escherichia coli mediated by acetate kinase.

Strains of Escherichia coli lacking all cytoplasmic chemotaxis proteins except CheY swim smoothly under most conditions. However, they tumble when exposed to acetate. Acetate coenzyme A synthetase (EC 6.2.1.1) was thought to be essential for this response. New evidence suggests that the tumbling is mediated instead by acetate kinase (EC 2.7.2.1), which might phosphorylate CheY via acetyl phosphate. In strains that were wild type for chemotaxis, neither acetate coenzyme A synthetase, acetate kinase, nor phosphotransacetylase (EC 2.3.1.8) (and thus acetyl phosphate) was required for responses to aspartate, serine, or sugars sensed by the phosphotransferase system. Thus, acetate-induced tumbling does not appear to play an essential role in chemotaxis in wild-type cells.     

Aspartate taxis mutants of the Escherichia coli tar chemoreceptor.

The Tar protein of Escherichia coli belongs to a family of methyl-accepting inner membrane proteins that mediate chemotactic responses to a variety of compounds. These transmembrane signalers monitor the chemical environment by means of specific ligand-binding sites arrayed on the periplasmic side of the membrane, and in turn control cytoplasmic signals that modulate the flagellar rotational machinery. The periplasmic receptor domain of Tar senses two quite different chemoeffectors, aspartate and maltose. Aspartate is detected through direct binding to Tar molecules, whereas maltose is detected indirectly when complexed with the periplasmic maltose-binding protein. Saturating levels of either aspartate or maltose do not block behavioral responses to the other compound, indicating that the detection sites for these two attractants are not identical. We initiated structure-function studies of these chemoreceptor sites by isolating tar mutants which eliminate aspartate or maltose taxis, while retaining the ability to respond to the other chemoeffector. Mutants with greatly reduced aspartate taxis are described and characterized in this report. When present in single copy in the chromosome, these tar mutations generally eliminated chemotactic responses to aspartate and structurally related compounds, such as glutamate and methionine. Residual responses to these compounds were shifted to higher concentrations, indicating a reduced affinity of the aspartate-binding site in the mutant receptors. Maltose responses in the mutants ranged from 10 to 80% of normal, but had no detectable threshold shifts, indicating that these receptor alterations may have little effect on maltose detection sensitivity. The mutational changes in 17 mutants were determined by DNA sequence analysis. Each mutant exhibited a single amino acid replacement at residue 64, 69, or 73 in the Tar molecule. The wild-type Tar transducer contains arginines at all three of these positions, implying that electrostatic forces may play an important role in aspartate detection.     

Mechanism of CheA protein kinase activation in receptor signaling complexes.

The chemotaxis receptor for aspartate, Tar, generates responses by regulating the activity of an associated histidine kinase, CheA. Tar is composed of an extracellular sensory domain connected by a transmembrane sequence to a cytoplasmic signaling domain. The cytoplasmic domain fused to a leucine zipper dimerization domain forms soluble active ternary complexes with CheA and an adapter protein, CheW. The kinetics of kinase activity within these complexes compared to CheA alone indicate approximately a 50% decrease in the KM for ATP and a 100-fold increase in the Vmax. A truncated CheA construct that lacks the phosphoaccepting H-domain and the CheY/CheB-binding domain forms an activated ternary complex that is similar to the one formed by the full-length CheA protein. The Vmax of H-domain phosphorylation by this complex is enhanced approximately 60-fold, the KM for ATP decreased to 50%, and the KM for H-domain decreased to 20% of the values obtained with the same CheA construct in the absence of receptor and CheW. The kinetic data support a mechanism of CheA regulation that involves perturbation of an equilibrium between an inactive form where the H-domain is loosely bound and an active form where the H-domain is tightly associated with the CheA active site and properly positioned for phosphotransfer. The data are consistent with an asymmetric mechanism of CheA activation [Levit, M., Liu, I., Surette, M. G., and Stock, J. B. (1996) J. Biol. Chem. 271, 32057-32063] wherein only one phosphoaccepting domain of CheA at a time can interact with an active center within a CheA dimer.     

Conditional inversion of the thermoresponse in Escherichia coli.

Mutants in Escherichia coli having defects in one of the methyl-accepting chemotaxis proteins, Tsr protein, which is the chemoreceptor and transducer for L-serine, showed a reduced but similar type of thermoresponse compared with wild-type strains; the cells showed smooth swimming upon temperature increase and tumbling upon temperature decrease. However, when the mutant cells were adapted to attractants such as L-aspartate and maltose, which are specific to another methyl-accepting chemotaxis protein, Tar protein, the direction of the thermoresponse was found to be inverted; a temperature increase induced tumbling and a temperature decrease induced smooth swimming. Consistent with this, the mutant cells showed inverted changes in the methylation level of Tar protein upon temperature changes. Wild-type strains but not Tar protein-deficient mutants exhibited the inverted thermoresponse when the cells were simultaneously adapted to L-aspartate and L-serine, indicating that Tar protein has a key role in the inversion of the thermoresponse. Thus, besides Tsr protein, Tar protein has a certain role in thermoreception. A simple model for thermoreception and inversion of the thermoresponse is also discussed.