Focusing on the nuclear and subnuclear dynamics of light and circadian signalling

Circadian clocks provide organisms the ability to synchronize their internal physiological responses with the external environment. This process, termed entrainment, occurs through the perception of internal and external stimuli. As with other organisms, in plants, the perception of light is a critical for the entrainment and sustainment of circadian rhythms. Red, blue, far‐red, and UV‐B light are perceived by the oscillator through the activity of photoreceptors. Four classes of photoreceptors signal to the oscillator: phytochromes, cryptochromes, UVR8, and LOV‐KELCH domain proteins. In most cases, these photoreceptors localize to the nucleus in response to light and can associate to subnuclear structures to initiate downstream signalling. In this review, we will highlight the recent advances made in understanding the mechanisms facilitating the nuclear and subnuclear localization of photoreceptors and the role these subnuclear bodies have in photoreceptor signalling, including to the oscillator. We will also highlight recent progress that has been made in understanding the regulation of the nuclear and subnuclear localization of components of the plant circadian clock.     

拟南芥ZTL/FKF1/LKP2蛋白家族功能研究进展

植物通过各类受体来感知外界环境的改变从而调节自身的生长和发育情况。在拟南芥中,植物主要通过隐花色素(Cryptochromes)和向光素(Phototropins)感知蓝光。同时ZEITLUPE (ZTL),FLAVIN-BINDING KELCH REPEAT F-box1 (FKF1)和LOV KELCH PROTEIN2 (LKP2)蛋白家族也作为蓝光受体参与调控植物生长发育过程。因其特殊的蛋白结构组成,在植物的光周期开花、节律性和光形态建成等方面发挥了重要的调控作用。近来,ZTL/FKF1/LKP2蛋白家族被发现参与植物逆境胁迫响应。本文归纳了ZTL/FKF1/LKP2的生物学功能研究进展,并对其作用机制进行了总结与讨论。     

LOV domain-containing F-box proteins: light-dependent protein degradation modules in Arabidopsis

Plants constantly survey the surrounding environment using several sets of photoreceptors. They can sense changes in the quantity (=intensity) and quality (=wavelength) of light and use this information to adjust their physiological responses, growth, and developmental patterns. In addition to the classical photoreceptors, such as phytochromes, cryptochromes, and phototropins, ZEITLUPE (ZTL), FLAVIN-BINDING, KELCH REPEAT, F-BOX 1 (FKF1), and LOV KELCH PROTEIN 2 (LKP2) proteins have been recently identified as blue-light photoreceptors that are important for regulation of the circadian clock and photoperiodic flowering. The ZTL/FKF1/LKP2 protein family possesses a unique combination of domains: a blue-light-absorbing LOV (Light, Oxygen, or Voltage) domain along with domains involved in protein degradation. Here, we summarize recent advances in our understanding of the function of the Arabidopsis ZTL/FKF1/LKP2 proteins. We summarize the distinct photochemical properties of their LOV domains and discuss the molecular mechanisms by which the ZTL/FKF1/LKP2 proteins regulate the circadian clock and photoperiodic flowering by controlling blue-light-dependent protein degradation.     

ZEITLUPE positively regulates hypocotyl elongation at warm temperature under light in Arabidopsis thaliana

Hypocotyl cell elongation has been studied as a model to understand how cellular expansion contributes to plant organ growth. Hypocotyl elongation is affected by multiple environmental factors, including light quantity and light quality. Red light inhibits hypocotyl growth via the phytochrome signaling pathways. Proteins of the FLAVIN-BINDING KELCH REPEAT F-BOX 1 / LOV KELCH PROTEIN 2 / ZEITLUPE family are positive regulators of hypocotyl elongation under red light in Arabidopsis. These proteins were suggested to reduce phytochrome-mediated inhibition of hypocotyl elongation. Here, we show that ZEITLUPE also functions as a positive regulator in warmth-induced hypocotyl elongation under light in Arabidopsis.     

LOV KELCH PROTEIN2 and ZEITLUPE repress Arabidopsis photoperiodic flowering under non-inductive conditions, dependent on FLAVIN-BINDING KELCH REPEAT F-BOX1

LOV KELCH PROTEIN2 (LKP2), ZEITLUPE (ZTL)/LOV KELCH PROTEIN1 (LKP1) and FLAVIN‐BINDING KELCH REPEAT F‐BOX1 (FKF1) constitute a family of Arabidopsis F‐box proteins that regulate the circadian clock. Over‐expression of LKP2 or ZTL causes arrhythmicity of multiple clock outputs under constant light and in constant darkness. Here, we show the significance of LKP2 and ZTL in the photoperiodic control of flowering time in Arabidopsis. In plants over‐expressing LKP2, CO and FT expression was down‐regulated under long‐day conditions. LKP2 and ZTL physically interacted with FKF1, which was recruited from the nucleus into cytosolic speckles. LKP2 and ZTL inhibited the interaction of FKF1 with CYCLING DOF FACTOR 1, a ubiquitination substrate for FKF1 that is localized in the nucleus. The Kelch repeat regions of LKP2 and ZTL were sufficient for their physical interaction with FKF1 and translocation of FKF1 to the cytoplasm. Over‐expression of LKP2 Kelch repeats induced late flowering under long‐day conditions. lkp2 ztl double mutant plants flowered earlier than wild‐type plants under short‐day (non‐inductive) conditions, and both CO and FT expression levels were up‐regulated in the double mutant plants. The early flowering of lkp2 ztl was dependent on FKF1. LKP2, ZTL or both affected the accumulation of FKF1 protein during the early light period. These results indicate that an important role of LKP2 and ZTL in the photoperiodic pathway is repression of flowering under non‐inductive conditions, and this is dependent on FKF1.     

A eukaryotic LOV-histidine kinase with circadian clock function in the picoalga Ostreococcus

The marine environment has unique properties of light transmission, with an attenuation of long wavelengths within the first meters of the water column. Marine organisms have therefore evolved specific blue‐light receptors such as aureochromes to absorb shorter‐wavelength light. Here, we identify and characterize a light, oxygen, or voltage sensing (LOV) containing histidine kinase (LOV‐HK) that functions as a new class of eukaryotic blue‐light receptor in the pico‐phytoplanktonic cell Ostreococcus tauri. This LOV‐HK is related to the large family of LOV‐HKs found in prokaryotes. Phylogenetic analysis indicates that the LOV domains from LOV‐HKs, including O. tauri LOV‐HK, and phototropins (phot; plant and green algal LOV serine/threonine kinases) have different evolutionary histories. Photochemical analysis shows that the LOV domain of LOV‐HK binds a flavin cofactor and absorbs blue light with a fast photocycle compared with its prokaryotic counterparts. Ostreococcus tauri LOV‐HK expression is induced by blue light and is under circadian control. Further, both overexpression and downregulation of LOV‐HK result in arrhythmia of the circadian reporter CCA1:Luc under constant blue light. In contrast, photochemical inactivation of O. tauri LOV‐HK is without effect, demonstrating its importance for function of the circadian clock under blue light. Overexpression/downregulation of O. tauriLOV‐HK alters CCA1 rhythmicity under constant red light, irrespective of LOV‐HK’s photochemical reactivity, suggesting that O. tauri LOV‐HK also participates in regulation of the circadian clock independent of its blue‐light‐sensing property. Molecular characterization of O. tauri LOV‐HK demonstrates that this type of photoreceptor family is not limited to prokaryotes.     

Photometrical analysis with photosensory domains of photoreceptors in green algae

Chloroplast photoorientation in the green alga Mougeotia scalaris is controlled by blue and red light. The properties of the LOV domains of phototropin A and B were consistent with previous data of action spectra and photoreceptor lifetime for blue light-mediated photoorientation. The LOV domains of the neochromes did not bind flavin, while the domains of neochrome 2 contributed to multimer formation. The absorption spectra of the neochrome phytochrome photosensory domain with phytochromobilin were very similar to the action spectra for red light-induced photoorientation. These results indicate that phototropin and neochrome work as the blue and red photoreceptors involved in photoorientation.     

Biological photoreceptors of light-dependent regulatory processes

Progress in understanding primary mechanisms of light reception in photoregulatory processes is achieved through discovering new biological photoreceptors, chiefly the regulatory sensors of blue/UV-A light. Among them are LOV domain-containing proteins and DNA photolyase-like cryptochromes, which constitute two widespread groups of photoreceptors that use flavin cofactors (FMN or FAD) as the photoactive chromophores. Bacterial LOV domain modules are connected in photoreceptor proteins with regulatory domains such as diguanylate cyclases/phosphodiesterases, histidine kinases, and DNA-binding domains that are activated by photoconversions of flavin. Identification of red/far-red light sensors in chemotrophic bacteria (bacteriophytochromes) and crystal structures of their photosensor module with bilin chromophore are significant for decoding the mechanisms of phytochrome receptor photoconversion and early step mechanisms of phytochrome-mediated signaling. The only UV-B regulatory photon sensor, UVR8, recently identified in plants, unlike other photoreceptors functions without a prosthetic chromophore: tryptophans of the unique UVR8 protein structure provide a “UV-B antenna”. Our analysis of new data on photosensory properties of the identified photoreceptors in conjunction with their structure opens insight on the influence of the molecular microenvironment on light-induced chromophore reactions, the mechanisms by which the photoactivated chromophores trigger conformational changes in the surrounding protein structure, and structural bases of propagation of these changes to the interacting effector domains/proteins.     

Light signaling and UV‐B‐mediated plant growth regulation

Light plays an important role in plants’ growth and development throughout their life cycle. Plants alter their morphological features in response to light cues of varying intensity and quality. Dedicated photoreceptors help plants to perceive light signals of different wavelengths. Activated photoreceptors stimulate the downstream signaling cascades that lead to extensive gene expression changes responsible for physiological and developmental responses. Proteins such as ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL5 (HY5) and CONSTITUTIVELY PHOTOMORPHOGENIC 1 (COP1) act as important factors which modulate light‐regulated gene expression, especially during seedling development. These factors function as central regulatory intermediates not only in red, far‐red, and blue light pathways but also in the UV‐B signaling pathway. UV‐B radiation makes up only a minor fraction of sunlight, yet it imparts many positive and negative effects on plant growth. Studies on UV‐B perception, signaling, and response in plants has considerably surged in recent times. Plants have developed different strategies to use UV‐B as a developmental cue as well as to withstand high doses of UV‐B radiation. Plants’ responses to UV‐B are an integration of its cross‐talks with both environmental factors and phytohormones. This review outlines the current developments in light signaling with a major focus on UV‐B‐mediated plant growth regulation.     

Photochemical and mutational analysis of the FMN-binding domains of the plant blue light receptor, phototropin

The plant photoreceptor phototropin is an autophosphorylating serine-threonine protein kinase activated by UV-A/blue light. Two domains, LOV1 and LOV2, members of the PAS domain superfamily, mediate light sensing by phototropin. Heterologous expression studies have shown that both domains function as FMN-binding sites. Although three plant blue light photoreceptors, cry1, cry2, and phototropin, have been identified to date, the photochemical reactions underlying photoactivation of these light sensors have not been described so far. Herein, we demonstrate that the LOV domains of Avena sativa phototropin undergo a self-contained photocycle characterized by a loss of blue light absorbance in response to light and a spontaneous recovery of the blue light-absorbing form in the dark. Rate constants and quantum efficiencies for the photoreactions indicate that LOV1 exhibits a lower photosensitivity than LOV2. The spectral properties of the photoproduct produced for both LOV domains are unrelated to those found for photoreduced flavins and flavoproteins, but are consistent with those of a flavin-cysteinyl adduct. Flavin-thiol adducts are generally short-lifetime reaction intermediates formed during the flavoprotein-catalyzed reduction of protein disulfides. By site-directed mutagenesis, we have identified several amino acid residues within the putative chromophore binding site of LOV1 and LOV2 that appear to be important for FMN binding and/or the photochemical reactivity. Among those is Cys39, which plays an important role in the photochemical reaction of the LOV domains. Replacement of Cys39 with Ala abolished the photochemical reactions of both LOV domains. We therefore propose that light sensing by the phototropin LOV domains occurs via the formation of a stable adduct between the FMN chromophore and Cys39.     

Light-stimulated respiration in the green algaDunaliella tertiolecta: Involvement of the ultraviolet/blue-light photoreceptor(s) and phytochrome?

Starch breakdown and respiratory O₂ uptake in the green algaDunaliella tertiolecta (Butcher) are stimulated not only by blue, but also by red light. In the present study, attempts are described to identify the photoreceptor(s) involved. Fluence rate-response curves with different slopes in the ultraviolet (UV)/blue and in the red spectral region as well as differences in the kinetics and in the unfluence of dark pre-incubation on the stimulation of respiratory O₂ uptake by blue and red light strongly indicate the action of two photoreceptors. Since the effect of red light shows some far-red reversibility, and since simultaneous irradiation with red and far-red light decreases the effectiveness of red light, the involvement of phytochrome — in addition to the UV/blue photoreceptor(s) — is suggested in the light-stimulated respiration inDunaliella.Abbreviation UV ultraviolet     

Light signaling in plants

Light signals have profound morphogenic effects on plant development. Signals perceived by the red/far‐red absorbing phytochrome family of photoreceptors and the blue/green/ UV‐A absorbing cryptochrome photoreceptor converge on a group of pleiotropic gene products defined by the COP/DET loci to control the pattern of development. The signaling pathway, although still undefined, includes several classic signaling molecules, such as G‐proteins, calcium, calmodulin, and cGMP. A separate signaling pathway is involved in the modulation of the phototropic response. Additional mutants have been identified that affect subsets of light signaling responses. This review provides an overview of our current understanding of the light signaling process, in particular recent genetic and biochemical advances.     

The phototropin family as photoreceptors for blue light-induced chloroplast relocation

Blue light-induced chloroplast accumulation and avoidance relocation movements are controlled by the blue light photoreceptor phototropin. The Arabidopsis thaliana genome has two phototropin genes encoding phot1 and phot2. Each of these photoreceptors contains two LOV (light oxygen and voltage) domains and a kinase domain. The LOV domains absorb blue light though an associated flavin mononucleotide chromophore, while the kinase domain is thought to be associated with signal transduction. The phototropins control not only chloroplast relocation movement, but also blue light-induced phototropic responses, leaf expansion and stomatal opening. Here I review the role of phototropin as a photoreceptor for chloroplast photorelocation movement. Electronic Publication     

Light-dependent, dark-promoted interaction between Arabidopsis cryptochrome 1 and phytochrome B proteins

Plant photoreceptors transduce environmental light cues to downstream signaling pathways, regulating a wide array of processes during growth and development. Two major plant photoreceptors with critical roles in photomorphogenesis are phytochrome B (phyB), a red/far-red absorbing photoreceptor, and cryptochrome 1 (CRY1), a UV-A/blue photoreceptor. Despite substantial genetic evidence for cross-talk between phyB and CRY1 pathways, a direct interaction between these proteins has not been observed. Here, we report that Arabidopsis phyB interacts directly with CRY1 in a light-dependent interaction. Surprisingly, the interaction is light-dissociated; CRY1 interacts specifically with the dark/far-red (Pr) state of phyB, but not with the red light-activated (Pfr) or the chromophore unconjugated form of the enzyme. The interaction is also regulated by light activation of CRY1; phyB Pr interacts only with the unstimulated form of CRY1 but not with the photostimulated protein. Further studies reveal that a small domain extending from the photolyase homology region (PHR) of CRY1 regulates the specificity of the interaction with different conformational states of phyB. We hypothesize that in plants, the phyB/CRY1 interaction may mediate cross-talk between the red/far-red- and blue/UV-sensing pathways, enabling fine-tuning of light responses to different spectral inputs.     

INTERACTION BETWEEN CRYPTOCHROME AND PHYTOCHROME IN HIGHER PLANT PHOTOMORPHOGENESIS

At least three photoreceptors are involved in the mediation of light action in higher plant photomorphogenesis: cryptochrome (UV-A/blue light photoreceptor), UV-B photoreceptor, and phytochrome. The degree of photoreceptor interaction in photomorphogenesis can apparently vary depending on the response, the species, and the stage of development of the biological system. In most cases of interaction studied so far, Pfr, the physiologically active form of phytochrome, is apparently required for the final expression of the response. In some systems, the cryptochrome and/or UV-B photoreceptor mediated action of UV/blue radiation is required to establish/enhance/maintain responsiveness toward Pfr. There is no evidence for photoreceptor interaction in some response-system combinations. It is not known for sure if this apparent lack of photoreceptor interaction represents a real situation or just a failure to detect it because of experimental limitations. Practically nothing is known about the mechanism of photoreceptor interaction at the molecular level.