Agonists activate Gi1 alpha or Gi2 alpha fused to the human mu opioid receptor differently

As preferential coupling of opioid receptor to various inhibitory Galpha subunits is still under debate, we have investigated the selectivity of the human mu opioid receptor fused to a pertussis toxin insensitive C351I Gi1 alpha or C352I Gi2 alpha in stably transfected HEK 293 cells. Overall agonist binding affinities were increased for both fusion constructs when compared to the wild type receptor. [35 S]GTPgammaS binding was performed on pertussis toxin treated cells to monitor coupling efficiency of the fusion constructs. Upon agonist addition hMOR-C351I Gi1 a exhibited an activation profile similar to the non-fused receptor while hMOR-C352I Gi2 alpha was poorly activated. Interestingly no correlation could be drawn between agonist binding affinity and efficacy. Upon agonist addition, forskolin-stimulated cAMP production, as measured using a reporter gene assay, was inhibited by signals transduced via the fused Gi1 alpha and Gi2 alpha mainly. In contrast both fusion constructs were able to initiate ERK-MAPK phosphorylation via coupling to endogenous G proteins only. In conclusion our data indicate that hMOR couples more efficiently to Gi1 alpha than Gi2 alpha and that the coupling efficacy is clearly agonist-dependent.     

Dimers of class A G protein-coupled receptors function via agonist-mediated trans-activation of associated G proteins

The histamine H1 receptor and the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor are G protein-coupled receptors that elevate intracellular [Ca2+] via activation of Gq/G11. Assessed by co-immunoprecipitation and time-resolved fluorescence resonance energy transfer they both exist as homo-dimers. The addition of the G protein G11alpha to the C terminus of these receptors did not prevent dimerization. Agonists produced a large stimulation of guanosine 5'-3-O-([35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTPgammaS) binding to receptor-G protein fusions containing wild type forms of both polypeptides. For both receptors this was abolished by incorporation of G208AG11alpha into the fusions. Mutation of a highly conserved leucine in intracellular loop 2 of each receptor also eliminated agonist function but not binding. Co-expression of the two non-functional but complementary fusion constructs reconstituted agonist-mediated binding of [35S]GTPgammaS in membranes of HEK293 cells and elevation of [Ca2+]i in mouse embryo fibroblasts lacking both Gq and G11. Co-expression of the histamine H1 receptor- and the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor-G11alpha fusions allowed detection of functional hetero-dimeric complexes, whereas co-expression of histamine H1 receptor-G11alpha with increasing amounts of L151Dalpha1b-adrenoreceptor resulted in decreasing levels of histamine-stimulated [35S]GTPgammaS binding. Co-expression of the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor with a fusion protein incorporating the N-terminal domain and transmembrane helix 1 of the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor and G11alpha did not result in agonist activation of the G protein but did indicate a role for transmembrane helix 1 in dimerization. These data demonstrate that dimers of these class A receptors function via trans-activation of associated G proteins.     

The human delta opioid receptor activates G(i1)alpha more efficiently than G(o1)alpha

To assess the relative capacity of the human delta opioid receptor to activate closely related G proteins, fusion proteins were constructed in which the alpha-subunits of either G(i1) or G(o1), containing point mutations to render them insensitive to the actions of pertussis toxin, were linked in-frame with the C-terminus of the receptor. Following transient and stable expression in HEK 293 cells, both constructs bound the antagonist [(3)H]naltrindole with high affinity. D-ala(2),D-leu(5) Enkephalin effectively inhibited forskolin-stimulated adenylyl cyclase activity in intact cells in a concentration-dependent, but pertussis toxin-insensitive, manner. The high-affinity GTPase activity of both constructs was also stimulated by D-ala(2),D-leu(5) enkephalin with similar potency. However, enzyme kinetic analysis of agonist stimulation of GTPase activity demonstrated that the GTP turnover number produced in response to D-ala(2),D-leu(5) enkephalin was more than three times greater for G(i1)alpha than for G(o1)alpha. As the effect of agonist in both cases was to increase V:(max) without increasing the observed K:(m) for GTP, this is consistent with receptor promoting greater guanine nucleotide exchange, and thus activation, of G(i1)alpha compared with G(o1)alpha. An equivalent fusion protein between the human mu opioid receptor-1 and G(i1)alpha produced a similar D-ala(2),D-leu(5) enkephalin-induced GTP turnover number as the delta opioid receptor-G(i1)alpha fusion construct, consistent with agonist occupation of these two opioid receptor subtypes being equally efficiently coupled to activation of G(i1)alpha.     

A1 adenosine receptors of bovine brain couple to guanine nucleotide-binding proteins Gi1, Gi2, and Go

A1 adenosine receptors and associated guanine nucleotide-binding proteins (G proteins) were purified from bovine cerebral cortex by affinity chromatography (Munshi, R., and Linden, J. (1989) J. Biol. Chem. 264, 14853-14859). In this study we have identified the pertussis toxin-sensitive G protein subunits that co-purify with A1 adenosine receptors by immunoblotting with specific antipeptide antisera. Gi alpha 1, Gi alpha 2, Go alpha, G beta 35, and G beta 36 were detected. Of the total [35S]guanosine 5'-O-(3-thio)triphosphate [( 35S]GTP gamma S) binding sites, Gi alpha 1 and Go alpha each accounted for greater than 37% whereas Gi alpha 2 comprised less than 13%. G beta 35 was found in excess over G beta 36. Low molecular mass (21-25 kDa) GTP-binding proteins were not detected. We also examined the characteristics of purified receptors and various purified bovine brain G proteins reconstituted into phospholipid vesicles. All three alpha-subunits restored GTP gamma S-sensitive high affinity binding of the agonist 125I-aminobenzyladenosine to a fraction (25%) of reconstituted receptors with a selectivity order of Gi2 greater than Go greater than or equal to Gi1 (ED50 values of G proteins measured as fold excess over the receptor concentration were 4.7 +/- 1.2, 24 +/- 5, and 34 +/- 7, respectively). Furthermore, receptors occupied with the agonist R-phenylisopropyladenosine catalytically increased the rate of binding of [35S]GTP gamma S to reconstituted G proteins by 6.5-8.5-fold. These results suggest that A1 adenosine receptors couple indiscriminately to pertussis toxin-sensitive G proteins.     

Kinetics of ternary complex formation with fusion proteins composed of the A(1)-adenosine receptor and G protein alpha-subunits.

High affinity agonist binding to G protein-coupled receptors depends on the formation of a ternary complex between agonist, receptor, and G protein. This process is too slow to be accounted for by a simple diffusion-controlled mechanism. We have tested if the interaction between activated receptor and G protein is rate-limiting by fusing the coding sequence of the human A(1)-adenosine receptor to that of Galpha(i-1) (A(1)/Galpha(i-1)) and of Galpha(o) (A(1)/Galpha(o)). Fusion proteins of the expected molecular mass were detected following transfection of HEK293 cells. Ternary complex formation was monitored by determining the kinetics for binding of the high affinity agonist (-)-N(6)-3[(125)I](iodo-4-hydroxyphenylisopropyl)adenosine; these were similar in the wild-type receptor and the fusion proteins over the temperature range of 10 to 30 degrees C. Agonist dissociation may be limited by the stability of the ternary complex. This assumption was tested by creating fusion proteins in which the Cys(351) of Galpha(i-1) was replaced with glycine (A(1)/Galpha(i-1)C351G) or isoleucine (A(1)/Galpha(i-1)C351I) to lower the affinity of the receptor for the G protein. In these mutated fusion proteins, the dissociation rate of the ternary complex was accelerated; in contrast, the rate of the forward reaction was not affected. We therefore conclude that (i) receptor activation per se rather than its interaction with the G protein is rate-limiting in ternary complex formation; (ii) the stability of the ternary complex is determined by the dissociation rate of the G protein. These features provide for a kinetic proofreading mechanism that sustains the fidelity of receptor-G protein coupling.     

Brain somatostatin receptor-G protein interaction. G alpha C-terminal antibodies demonstrate coupling of the soluble receptor with Gi(1-3) but not with Go.

Somatostatin (SST) receptors activate potassium channels, stimulate protein phosphatases, inhibit adenylate cyclase and close calcium channels. These multiple effects are controlled by guanine nucleotide binding (G) proteins of the pertussis toxin-sensitive Gi and Go types. In the present study we have identified the G proteins coupling with brain SST receptors. To this end, brain SST receptors were solubilized in G-protein coupled form. Binding of the SST analogue MK 678 to the solubilized receptor was completely inhibited by guanosine 5'-O-thiotriphosphate (IC50 = 100 nM), reflecting decreased receptor affinity for agonist following uncoupling of the receptor and G protein(s). Antibodies raised against specific COOH-terminal peptides of the G proteins Gi(1-3), Go, and Gz were used to probe for SST receptor-G protein coupling in this system. Antibodies binding to the COOH-terminal regions of Gi1 and Gi2 (antibody AS) and Gi3 (antibody EC) inhibited binding of 125I-MK 678 (75 pM) by 57 +/- 4% and 48 +/- 5%, respectively. The effects of these antibodies were concentration-dependent and additive, such that in combination AS and EC completely inhibited binding. Antibodies binding to the COOH-terminal region of Go (GO) and Gz (QN) did not affect binding of 125I-MK 678, indicating that neither Go nor Gz are associated with the brain SST receptor. Prelabeling of the receptor with 125I-MK 678 prior to addition of antibody induced the formation of a "locked conformation" of the agonist-bound receptor-G protein complex which was insensitive to antibody. In conclusion, Gi1 and/or Gi2 and Gi3 are coupled in approximately equal proportions to the brain 125I-MK 678-binding SST receptor, accounting for all of the G protein coupling of this receptor.     

Coupling of the thrombin receptor to G12 may account for selective effects of thrombin on gene expression and DNA synthesis in 1321N1 astrocytoma cells.

In 1321N1 astrocytoma cells, thrombin, but not carbachol, induces AP-1-mediated gene expression and DNA synthesis. To understand the divergent effects of these G protein-coupled receptor agonists on cellular responses, we examined Gq-dependent signaling events induced by thrombin receptor and muscarinic acetylcholine receptor stimulation. Thrombin and carbachol induce comparable changes in phosphoinositide and phosphatidylcholine hydrolysis, mobilization of intracellular Ca2+, diglyceride generation, and redistribution of protein kinase C; thus, activation of these Gq-signaling pathways appears to be insufficient for gene expression and mitogenesis. Thrombin increases Ras and mitogen-activated protein kinase activation to a greater extent than carbachol in 1321N1 cells. The effects of thrombin are not mediated through Gi, since ribosylation of Gi/Go proteins by pertussis toxin does not prevent thrombin-induced gene expression or thrombin-stimulated DNA synthesis. We recently reported that the pertussis toxin-insensitive G12 protein is required for thrombin-induced DNA synthesis. We demonstrate here, using transfection of receptors and G proteins in COS-7 cells, that G alpha 12 selectively couples the thrombin receptor to AP-1-mediated gene expression. This does not appear to result from increased mitogen-activated protein kinase activity but may reflect activation of a tyrosine kinase pathway. We suggest that preferential coupling of the thrombin receptor to G12 accounts for the selective ability of thrombin to stimulate Ras, mitogen-activated protein kinase, gene expression, and mitogenesis in 1321N1 cells.     

Characterization of M2 muscarinic receptor activation of different G protein subtypes

The M2 muscarinic acetylcholine receptor (mAChR) expressed in insect cells (Spodoptera frugiperda, Sf9) using the baculovirus system formed active functional complexes with coexpressed Gi as well as with Go proteins, while no complexes could be detected with internal G proteins. Comparison of the abilities of different muscarinic agonists and partial agonists to increase [35S]GTPgammaS binding revealed no significant differences between M2/Gi and M2/Go complexes neither with respect to affinities nor efficacies of the ligands studied. Coexpression with either G protein caused constitutive activity of the receptor amounting up to 66% of stimulable [35S]GTPgammaS binding. Muscarinic antagonists, like atropine, scopolamine and N-methylscopolamine, behaved as inverse antagonists with potencies in good agreement with their binding affinities to the receptor. The results implicate that the functional reconstitution of M2 muscarinic receptor with either Gi or Go proteins in insect cells provides a valuable tool for screening of potencies as well as efficacies of agonists, partial agonists and inverse agonists at this receptor.     

Immunoprecipitation of alpha 2a-adrenergic receptor-GTP-binding protein complexes using GTP-binding protein selective antisera. Changes in receptor/GTP-binding protein interaction following agonist binding.

The nature of the interaction of cloned alpha 2a-adrenergic receptors from LLC-PK1-O clone cells with G proteins was investigated using an immunoprecipitation approach. Following solubilization of the alpha 2a receptors, antiserum 8730, which is directed against the C-terminal region of Gi alpha, immunoprecipitated alpha 2a receptor-Gi alpha complexes. The immunoprecipitation was specific since it could be blocked by the peptide to which antiserum 8730 was generated. Antisera 3646 (anti-Gi alpha 1), 1521 (anti-Gi alpha 2), and 1518 (anti-Gi alpha 3) immunoprecipitated solubilized alpha 2a receptor-Gi alpha complexes, indicating that all three Gi alpha subtypes couple with the alpha 2a receptor. Antiserum 9072, which is directed against the C-terminal region of G(o)alpha, immunoprecipitated solubilized alpha 2a receptor-G alpha complexes indicating that these receptors are also coupled to G(o)alpha. Antiserum 8132, which is directed against G beta 36, immunoprecipitated solubilized alpha 2a receptors while the G beta 35 antiserum 8129, did not, indicating that alpha 2a receptors selectively associate with G beta 36. The binding of the partial agonist p-aminoclonidine to the solubilized alpha 2a receptor alters the association of the receptor with G proteins. Following p-aminoclonidine binding to the solubilized alpha 2a receptor, the ability of the C-terminal directed G alpha antisera 8730 and 9072 to coimmunoprecipitate the alpha 2a receptor-G alpha complex was greatly reduced. The effect of p-aminoclonidine was concentration dependent, mimicked by the full agonist UK 14304 and blocked by the alpha 2 receptor antagonist yohimbine. In contrast, antisera directed against internal regions of Gi alpha and G(o)alpha, immunoprecipitated the agonist-bound and agonist-free alpha 2a receptor equally well. These findings indicate that following the binding of agonists to the alpha 2a receptor, Gi alpha and G(o)alpha remain physically associated with the receptor but either the conformation of G alpha linked to the receptor or the conformation of the receptor itself is modified such that the epitope for the C-terminal directed anti-Gi alpha and anti-G(o)alpha antisera are not accessible. These agonist-induced conformational changes in the alpha 2a receptor-G alpha complex may be important for the activation of the G protein and the stimulation of the alpha 2a receptor signal transduction pathway.     

Inhibition of G alpha i2 activation by G alpha i3 in CXCR3-mediated signaling

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) convey extracellular stimulation into dynamic intracellular action, leading to the regulation of cell migration and differentiation. T lymphocytes express G alpha(i2) and G alpha(i3), two members of the G alpha(i/o) protein family, but whether these two G alpha(i) proteins have distinguishable roles guiding T cell migration remains largely unknown because of a lack of member-specific inhibitors. This study details distinct G alpha(i2) and G alpha(i3) effects on chemokine receptor CXCR3-mediated signaling. Our data showed that G alpha(i2) was indispensable for T cell responses to three CXCR3 ligands, CXCL9, CXCL10, and CXCL11, as the lack of G alpha(i2) abolished CXCR3-stimulated migration and guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) incorporation. In sharp contrast, T cells isolated from G alpha(i3) knock-out mice displayed a significant increase in both GTPgammaS incorporation and migration as compared with wild type T cells when stimulated with CXCR3 agonists. The increased GTPgammaS incorporation was blocked by G alpha(i3) protein in a dose-dependent manner. G alpha(i3)-mediated blockade of G alpha(i2) activation did not result from G alpha(i3) activation, but instead resulted from competition or steric hindrance of G alpha(i2) interaction with the CXCR3 receptor via the N terminus of the second intracellular loop. A mutation in this domain abrogated not only G alpha(i2) activation induced by a CXCR3 agonist but also the interaction of G alpha(i3) to the CXCR3 receptor. These findings reveal for the first time an interplay of G alpha(i) proteins in transmitting G protein-coupled receptor signals. This interplay has heretofore been masked by the use of pertussis toxin, a broad inhibitor of the G alpha(i/o) protein family.     

Immunoprecipitation of high-affinity, guanine nucleotide-sensitive, solubilized mu-opioid receptors from rat brain: coimmunoprecipitation of the G proteins G(alpha o), G(alpha i1), and G(alpha i3)

Antibodies directed against the C-terminal and the N-terminal regions of the mu-opioid receptor were generated to identify the G proteins that coimmunoprecipitate with the mu receptor. Two fusion proteins were constructed: One contained the 50 C-terminal amino acids of the mu receptor, and the other contained 61 amino acids near the N terminus of the receptor. Antisera directed against both fusion proteins were capable of immunoprecipitating approximately 70% of solubilized rat brain mu receptors as determined by [3H][D-Ala2,N-Me-Phe4,Gly-ol5]-enkephalin ([3H]DAMGO) saturation binding. The material immunoprecipitated with both of the antisera was recognized as a broad band with a molecular mass between 60 and 75 kDa when screened in a western blot. Guanosine 5'-O-(3-thiotriphosphate) (GTPgammaS) had an EC50 of 0.4 nM in diminishing [3H]DAMGO binding to the immunoprecipitated pellet. The ratio of G proteins to mu receptors in the immunoprecipitated material was 1:1. When the material immunoprecipitated with affinity-purified antibody was screened for the presence of G protein a subunits, it was determined that G(alpha)o, G(alpha)i1, G(alpha)i3, and to a lesser extent G(alpha)i2, but not G(alpha)s or G(alpha)q11, were coimmunoprecipitated with the mu receptor. Inclusion of GTPgammaS during the immunoprecipitation process abolished the coimmunoprecipitation of G proteins.     

Identification of the subunits of GTP-binding proteins coupled to somatostatin receptors.

Somatostatin (SRIF) induces its biological effects by interacting with membrane-bound receptors that are linked to cellular effector systems via G proteins. We have studied SRIF receptor-G protein associations by solubilizing the SRIF receptor from rat brain and AtT-20 cells and immunoprecipitating the receptor-G protein complex with peptide-directed antisera against the different subunits of the G protein heterotrimer. Antiserum 8730, which selectively interacts with all Gi alpha subtypes, maximally and specifically immunoprecipitated SRIF receptor-Gi alpha complexes. To identify the subtypes of Gi alpha that are coupled to SRIF receptors, the subtype-selective antisera 3646, 1521, and 1518, which specifically interact with Gi alpha 1, Gi alpha 2, and Gi alpha 3, respectively, were used to immunoprecipitate SRIF receptor-Gi alpha complexes. Antiserum 3646 immunoprecipitated SRIF receptor-Gi alpha 1 complexes from both brain and AtT-20 cells. Antiserum 1521 immunoprecipitated Gi alpha 2 from both brain and AtT-20 cells but did not immunoprecipitate SRIF receptors from these tissues. Antiserum 1518 immunoprecipitated AtT-20 cell SRIF receptors but uncoupled brain SRIF receptor-G protein complexes. This result was confirmed with another peptide-selective antiserum, SQ, directed against Gi alpha 3. The findings from these studies indicate that Gi alpha 1 and Gi alpha 3 are coupled to SRIF receptors, whereas Gi alpha 2 is not. Even though brain and AtT-20 cell SRIF receptors were both coupled to Gi alpha, the receptors from these tissues differed in their coupling to Go alpha. Antiserum 2353, which is directed against Go alpha, immunoprecipitated SRIF receptors from AtT-20 cells, but did not immunoprecipitate or uncouple SRIF receptor-G protein complexes from rat brain. To determine the beta subunits associated with the SRIF receptor, antisera directed against G beta 36 and G beta 35 were used to immunoprecipitate SRIF receptor-G protein complexes from brain. Peptide-directed antiserum against G beta 36 selectively immunoprecipitated solubilized brain SRIF receptors. However, antiserum directed against the G beta 35 subunit did not immunoprecipitate brain SRIF receptors, suggesting that brain SRIF receptors may preferentially associate with G beta 36. In addition to coimmunoprecipitating with Gi alpha and G beta, brain SRIF receptors coimmunoprecipitated the G protein gamma subunits, G gamma 2 and G gamma 3. These results provide the first evidence that SRIF receptors are coupled to different subunits of G proteins and suggest that selectivity exists in the association of different G protein subunits with the SRIF receptor.     

Differential capacities of the RGS1, RGS16 and RGS-GAIP regulators of G protein signaling to enhance alpha2A-adrenoreceptor agonist-stimulated GTPase activity of G(o1)alpha

Recombinant RGS1, RGS16 and RGS-GAIP, but not RGS2, were able to substantially further stimulate the maximal GTPase activity of G(o1)alpha promoted by agonists at the alpha2A-adrenoreceptor in a concentration-dependent manner. Kinetic analysis of the regulation of an alpha2A-adrenoreceptor-G(o1)alpha fusion protein by all three RGS proteins revealed that they had similar affinities for the receptor-G protein fusion. However, their maximal effects on GTP hydrolysis varied over threefold with RGS16 > RGS1 > RGS-GAIP. Both RGS1 and RGS16 reduced the potency of the alpha2A-adrenoreceptor agonist adrenaline by some 10-fold. A lower potency shift was observed for the partial agonist UK14304 and the effect was absent for the weak partial agonist oxymetazoline. Each of these RGS proteins altered the intrinsic activity of both UK14304 and oxymetazoline relative to adrenaline. Such results require the RGS interaction with G(o1)alpha to alter the conformation of the alpha2A-adrenoreceptor and are thus consistent with models invoking direct interactions between RGS proteins and receptors. These studies demonstrate that RGS1, RGS16 and RGS-GAIP show a high degree of selectivity to regulate alpha2A-adrenoreceptor-activated G(o1)alpha rather than G(i1)alpha, G(i2)alpha or G(i3)alpha and different capacities to inactivate this G protein.     

Receptor-Galpha fusion proteins as a tool for ligand screening

We have prepared fusion proteins of muscarinic M1-M5 receptors with alpha subunits of G proteins Gi1, Gi2, Gs, G11, G16 and chimera of G protein alpha subunits using the bacurovirus-Sf9 expression system. In fusion proteins such as M2-Gi1alpha and M4-Gi1alpha, agonist caused the decrease in the apparent affinity for GDP of these fusion proteins and then the increase in [35S]GTPgammaS binding in the presence of GDP. Thus we could use the membrane preparation expressing these fusion proteins as a tool to screen agonists and antagonists. On the other hand, the effect of agonists to decrease the apparent affinity for GDP was not clearly observed in fusion proteins of Gq/G11-coupled receptors such as M1-G11alpha, M3-G11alpha, and M5-G11alpha. The effect of agonists could be observed for fusion proteins with G16alpha of muscarinic M1, M2 and adrenergic beta2 receptors, but the extent of the effect was much less than that for fusion proteins with Gi1alpha of Gi/Go-coupled receptors. Fusion proteins of M1 receptors with Gi1alpha or chimera of G16alpha and Gi2alpha were also not effective in detecting the action of agonists.     

Immunological and biochemical differentiation of guanyl nucleotide binding proteins: interaction of Go alpha with rhodopsin, anti-Go alpha polyclonal antibodies, and a monoclonal antibody against transducin alpha subunit and Gi alpha

Guanyl nucleotide binding proteins couple agonist interaction with cell-surface receptors to an intracellular enzymatic response. In the adenylate cyclase system, inhibitory and stimulatory effects are mediated through guanyl nucleotide binding proteins, Gi and Gs, respectively. In the visual excitation complex, the photon receptor rhodopsin is linked to its target, cGMP phosphodiesterase, through transducin (Gt). Bovine brain contains another guanyl nucleotide binding protein, Go. The proteins are heterotrimers of alpha, beta, and gamma subunits; the alpha subunits catalyze receptor-stimulated GTP hydrolysis. To examine the interaction of Go alpha with beta gamma subunits and rhodopsin, the proteins were reconstituted in phosphatidylcholine vesicles. The GTPase activity of Go alpha purified from bovine brain was stimulated by photolyzed, but not dark, rhodopsin and was enhanced by bovine retinal Gt beta gamma or by rabbit liver G beta gamma. Go alpha in the presence of G beta gamma is a substrate for pertussis toxin catalyzed ADP-ribosylation; the modification was inhibited by photolyzed rhodopsin and enhanced by guanosine 5'-O-(2-thiodiphosphate). ADP-Ribosylation of Go alpha by pertussis toxin inhibited photolyzed rhodopsin-stimulated, but not basal, GTPase activity. It would appear from this and prior studies that Go alpha is similar to Gt alpha and Gi alpha; all three proteins exhibit photolyzed rhodopsin-stimulated GTPase activity, are pertussis toxin substrates, and functionally couple to Gt beta gamma. Go alpha (39K) can be distinguished from Gi alpha (41K) but not from Gt alpha (39K) by molecular weight.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Coordinated agonist regulation of receptor and G protein palmitoylation and functional rescue of palmitoylation-deficient mutants of the G protein G11alpha following fusion to the alpha1b-adrenoreceptor: palmitoylation of G11alpha is not required for interaction with beta*gamma complex.

Transfection of either the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor or Galpha(11) into a fibroblast cell line derived from a Galpha(q)/Galpha(11) double knockout mouse failed to produce elevation of intracellular [Ca(2+)] upon the addition of agonist. Co-expression of these two polypeptides, however, produced a significant stimulation. Co-transfection of the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor with the palmitoylation-resistant C9S,C10S Galpha(11) also failed to produce a signal, and much reduced and kinetically delayed signals were obtained using either C9S Galpha(11) or C10S Galpha(11). Expression of a fusion protein between the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor and Galpha(11) allowed [Ca(2+)](i) elevation, and this was also true for a fusion protein between the alpha(1b)-adrenoreceptor and C9S,C10S Galpha(11), since this strategy ensures proximity of the two polypeptides at the cell membrane. For both fusion proteins, co-expression of transducin alpha, as a beta.gamma-sequestering agent, fully attenuated the Ca(2+) signal. Both of these fusion proteins and one in which an acylation-resistant form of the receptor was linked to wild type Galpha(11) were also targets for agonist-regulated [(3)H]palmitoylation and bound [(35)S]guanosine 5'-3-O-(thio)triphosphate (GTPgammaS) in an agonist concentration-dependent manner. The potency of agonist to stimulate [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding was unaffected by the palmitoylation potential of either receptor or G protein. These studies provide clear evidence for coordinated, agonist-mediated regulation of the post-translational acylation of both a receptor and partner G protein and demonstrate the capacity of such fusions to bind and then release beta.gamma complex upon agonist stimulation whether or not the G protein can be palmitoylated. They also demonstrate that Ca(2+) signaling in EF88 cells by such fusion proteins is mediated via release of the G protein beta.gamma complex.     

An Asp79Asn mutation of the alpha2A-adrenoceptor interferes equally with agonist activation of individual Gialpha-family G protein subtypes

The quantitative effects of an Asp79Asn mutation in the porcine alpha2A-adrenoceptor on adrenaline-mediated stimulation of the alpha subunit of individual members of the Gi family of G proteins were assessed by measuring GTP turnover number for fusion proteins between the wild type or mutated receptor and pertussis toxin-resistant forms of each of Gi1, Gi2 and Gi3. In each case the receptor mutation limited activation of the G protein to 8-14% of that produced by the wild type receptor. Previous demonstration that in a single cell this mutation selectively interferes with alpha2A-adrenoceptor regulation of distinct effector end points transduced by Gi family members must therefore reflect differential requirements for amplification or the cellular location of individual, co-expressed, G proteins.     

Functional interactions of recombinant alpha 2 adrenergic receptor subtypes and G proteins in reconstituted phospholipid vesicles.

The functional interaction of the recombinant alpha 2 adrenergic receptor subtypes, alpha 2-C10 (the human platelet alpha 2 receptor, equivalent to the alpha 2 A subtype) and alpha 2-C4 (an alpha 2 receptor subtype cloned from a human kidney cDNA library), with G proteins was characterized in an in vitro reconstitution system. These receptor subtypes were overexpressed in COS-7 cells and were purified to a specific activity of 1.1-3.3 nmol/mg of protein. The G proteins consisted of Gs (adenylyl cyclase stimulatory) and members of the inhibitory family, including Gi1, Gi2, and Gi3, and G0. The cloned alpha subunits of these G proteins were overexpressed in Escherichia coli and were purified to homogeneity. Prior to use, G holoproteins were prepared by mixing the alpha subunits with beta gamma subunits that had been purified from bovine brain. Following reconstitution into phospholipid vesicles, both alpha 2 receptor subtypes could couple to the inhibitory G proteins but not to Gs, as assessed by agonist stimulation of GTPase activity. The pharmacological specificity of this interaction was preserved with respect to the two receptor subtypes. Between the different inhibitory G proteins, the alpha 2-C10 adrenergic receptor subtype showed the following preference: Gi3 greater than Gi1 greater than or equal to Gi2 greater than G0. The stimulation of GTPase activity (turnover number) ranged from 6.4-fold (Gi3) to 1.5-fold (G0). The preference of G-protein interaction for the alpha 2-C4 receptor subtype was the same as that observed for the alpha 2-C10, but the extent of activation was slightly lower. The results show that in vitro each of the alpha 2 adrenergic receptor subtypes can activate multiple G proteins but that clear preferences exist with respect to the individual inhibitory G-protein subtypes. Additionally, it appears that alpha 2-C10 is coupled more efficiently to G-protein activation than is alpha 2-C4.     

Pharmacological comparison of a recombinant CB1 cannabinoid receptor with its G(alpha 16) fusion product

The pharmacology of G protein-coupled receptors is widely accepted to depend on the G protein subunit to which the agonist-stimulated receptor couples. In order to investigate whether CB(1) agonist-mediated signal transduction via an engineered G(alpha 16) system is different than that of the G(i/o) coupling normally preferred by the CB(1) receptor, we transfected the human recombinant CB(1) receptor (hCB(1)) or a fusion protein comprising the hCB(1) receptor and G(alpha 16) (hCB(1)-G(alpha 16)) into HEK293 cells. From competition binding studies, the rank order of ligand affinities at the hCB(1)-G(alpha 16) fusion protein was found to be similar to that for hCB(1): HU 210 > CP 55,940 > or = SR 141716A > WIN 55212-2 > anandamide > JWH 015. Agonists increased [(35)S]GTP gamma S binding or inhibited forskolin-stimulated cAMP, presumably by coupling to G(i/o), in cells expressing hCB(1) but not hCB(1)-G(alpha 16). However, an analogous rank order of potencies was observed for these agonists in their ability to evoke increases in intracellular calcium concentration in cells expressing hCB(1)-G(alpha 16) but not hCB(1). These data demonstrate that ligand affinities for the hCB(1) receptor are not affected by fusion to the G(alpha 16) subunit. Furthermore, there is essentially no difference in the function of the hCB(1) receptor when coupled to G(i/o) or G (alpha 16).     

Cannabinoid receptor-induced neurite outgrowth is mediated by Rap1 activation through G(alpha)o/i-triggered proteasomal degradation of Rap1GAPII

The G(alpha)o/i-coupled CB1 cannabionoid receptor induces neurite outgrowth in Neuro-2A cells. The mechanisms of signaling through G(alpha)o/i to induce neurite outgrowth were studied. The expression of G(alpha)o/i reduces the stability of its direct interactor protein, Rap1GAPII, by targeting it for ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation. This results in the activation of Rap1. G(alpha)o/i-induced activation of endogenous Rap1 in Neuro-2A cells is blocked by the proteasomal inhibitor lactacystin. G(alpha)o/i stimulates neurite outgrowth that is blocked by the expression of dominant negative Rap1. Expression of Rap1GAPII also blocks the G(alpha)o/i-induced neurite outgrowth and treatment with proteasomal inhibitors potentiates this inhibition. The endogenous G(alpha)o/i-coupled cannabinoid (CB1) receptor in Neuro-2A cells stimulates the degradation of Rap1GAPII; activation of Rap1 and treatment with pertussis toxin or lactacystin blocks these effects. The CB1 receptor-stimulated neurite outgrowth is blocked by treatment with pertussis toxin, small interfering RNA for Rap, lactacystin, and expression of Rap1GAPII. Thus, the G(alpha)o/i-coupled cannabinoid receptor, by regulating the proteasomal degradation of Rap1GAPII, activates Rap1 to induce neurite outgrowth.