Behavioral detection of electric signal waveform distortion in the weakly electric fish,Gnathonemus petersii

The novelty response of weakly electric mormyrids is a transient acceleration of the rate of electric organ discharges (EOD) elicited by a change in stimulus input. In this study, we used it as a tool to test whether Gnathonemus petersii can perceive minute waveform distortions of its EOD that are caused by capacitive objects, as would occur during electrolocation. Four predictions of a hypothesis concerning the mechanism of capacitance detection were tested and confirmed: (1) G. petersii exhibited a strong novelty response to computer-generated (synthetic) electric stimuli that mimic both the waveform and frequency shifts of the EOD caused by natural capacitive objects (Fig. 3). (2) Similar responses were elicited by synthetic stimuli in which only the waveform distortion due to phase shifting the EOD frequency components was present (Fig. 4). (3) Novelty responses could reliably be evoked by a constant amplitude phase shifted EOD that effects the entire body of the fish evenly, i.e., a phase difference across the body surface was lacking (Figs. 3, 4). (4) Local presentation of a phase-shifted EOD mimic that stimulated only a small number of electroreceptor organs at a single location was also effective in eliciting a behavioral response (Fig. 5).Our results indicate that waveform distortions due to phase shifts alone, i.e. independent of amplitude or frequency cues, are sufficient for the detection of capacitive, animate objects. Mormyrids perceive even minute waveform changes of their own EODs by centrally comparing the input of the two types of receptor cells within a single mormyromast electroreceptor organ. Thus, no comparison of differentially affected body regions is necessary. This shows that G. petersii indeed uses a unique mechanism for signal analysis, which is different from the one employed by gymnotiform wavefish.Abbreviations EOD electric organ discharge - p-p-amplitude peak-to-peak amplitude     

Waveform tuning of electroreceptor cells in the weakly electric fish, Gnathonemus petersii

Electroreceptive afferents from A- and B-electroreceptor cells of mormyromasts and Knollenorgans were tested for their sensitivity to different stimulus waveforms in the weakly electric fish Gnathonemus petersii. Both A- and B-mormyromast cells had their lowest sensitivity to a waveform similar to the self-generated electric organ discharge (EOD) (around 0° phase-shift). Highest sensitivities, i.e. lowest response thresholds, in both A- and B-cells were measured at phase shifts of +135°. Thus, both cell types were inversely waveform tuned. The sensitivity of B-cells increased sharply with increasing waveform distortions. Their tuning curves had a sharp minimum of sensitivity at +7° phase shift. A-cells had a much broader waveform tuning with a plateau level of low sensitivity from +24° to −15°. Across a 360° cycle of phase-shifts, the range of thresholds was 16 dB for individual B-cells and 4.5 dB for individual A-cells. Knollenorgan afferents were tuned to 0° phase-shifted EODs and had a dynamic range of 12 dB. Lowest sensitivities were measured at a phase shift of +165°. Experiments with computer-generated stimuli revealed that the strong sensitivity of mormyromast B-cells of EOD waveform distortions cannot be attributed to any of the seven waveform parameters tested. In addition, EOD stimuli must have the correct duration for B-cells to respond to waveform distortions. Thus, waveform tuning appears to be based on the specific combination of several waveform parameters that occur only with natural EODs. Accepted: 28 April 1997     

Differential responses of two types of electroreceptive afferents to signal distortions may permit capacitance measurement in a weakly electric fish,Gnathonemus petersii

Summary Gnathonemus petersii discriminates between ohmic and capacitive objects. To investigate the sensory basis of this discrimination we recorded from primary afférents that innervate either A or B mormyromast sensory cells. Modified and natural electric organ discharges were used as stimuli. In both A and B fibres frequencies below the peak-power frequency (3.8 to 4.5 kHz) of the electric organ discharge caused minimal first-spike latencies and a maximum number of spikes. A fibres did not discriminate phase-shifted stimuli, whereas B fibres responded significantly with a decrease in first-spike latency if the phase shift was only — 1°. In both A and B fibres an amplitude increase caused a decrease in spike latency and an increase in spike number; an amplitude decrease had the reverse effect. If stimulated with quasi-natural electric organ discharges distorted by capacitive objects, the responses of A fibres decreased with increasing signal distortion. In contrast, the responses of B fibres increased until amplitude effects began to dominate. Gnathonemus may use the physiological differences between A and B fibres to detect and discriminate between capacitive and purely ohmic objects.Abbreviations ELL electrosensory lateral line lobe - EOD electric organ discharge - LFS local filtered signal - p-p peak-to-peak     

Electrolocation of Capacitive Objects in Four Species of Pulse-type Weakly Electric Fish I. Discrimination Performance

The great variety of species-typical electric signals (electric organ discharges, EOD) emitted by weakly electric mormyrid fish might be the result of evolutionary pressures stemming from the two main functions of the electro-sensory-motor system: electrocommunication and electrolocation. Employing a conditioned discrimination task we tested four species of mormyrids, emitting EODs differing in waveform, for their ability to detect capacitive properties of objects during electrolocation. Each fish could discriminate capacitive objects within a certain range of capacitive values, which was species specific. The upper and lower limits (upper and lower thresholds) of this detectable range were determined for each fish. In fish species emitting long duration EODs composed of mainly low spectral frequencies both the lower and the upper thresholds were shifted to larger capacitive values compared to fish species emitting shorter EODs. The upper limit of the detectable range was much more variable between species than the lower limit, which was relatively low in all fish. We interpret this as an adaptation of mormyrids to detect small capacitive objects, for example food items. All mormyrids could discriminate between a resistive object and a capacitive object even if the complex impedances of the two objects were identical. This implies that the fish are highly sensitive to small waveform distortions of their self produced EODs.     

Electric organ corollary discharge pathways in mormyrid fish

Corollary discharge signals associated with the motor command that elicits the electric organ discharge are prominent in the electrosensory lobe of mormyrid fish (Gnathonemus petersii). Central pathways and structures that convey these signals from the motor command nucleus to the electrosensory lobe are known anatomically, but these structures and their contributions to the various corollary discharge phenomena have not been examined physiologically. This study examines one such structure, the mesencephalic command associated nucleus (MCA).Recordings from MCA cells show a highly stereotyped two spike response. The first spike of the response has a latency of about 2.5 ms following the initiation of the electric organ discharge (EOD) motor command which is about 5.5 ms before the occurrence of the EOD.Results from stimulation and lesion experiments indicate that MCA is responsible for: 1) the gate-like corollary discharge-driven inhibition of the knollenorgan pathway; 2) the gate-like corollary discharge-driven excitation of granule cells in the mormyromast regions of the electrosensory lobe; and 3) various excitatory effects on other cells in the mormyromast regions.Some corollary discharge phenomena are still present after MCA lesions, including the earliest corollary discharge effects and the plasticity that follows pairing with electrosensory stimuli. These phenomena must be mediated by structures other than MCA.Abbreviations BCA bulbar command associated nucleus - C EOD motor command - C3 central cerebellar lobule 3 - COM EOD motor command nucleus - DLZ dorsolateral zone of ELL cortex - EGa eminentia granularis anterior - EGp eminentia granularis posterior - ELa nucleus exterolateralis anterior - ELL electrosensory lobe - ELLml molecular layer of ELL cortex - EOD electric organ discharge - gang ganglion layer - gran granule layer - jlem juxtalemniscal region - JLl lateral juxtalobar nucleus - JLm medial juxtalobar nucleus - lat nucleus lateralis - ll lateral lemniscus - MCA mesencephalic command associated nucleus - mol molecular layer - MOml molecular layer of the medial octavolateral nucleus - MRN medullary relay nucleus - MZ medial zone of ELL cortex - nALL anterior lateral line nerve - NELL nucleus of the electrosensory lobe - nX cranial nerve X (vagus) - OT optic tectum - PCA paratrigeminal command associated nucleus - pee praeeminentialis electrosensory tract - plex plexiform layer - prae nucleus praeeminentialis - sublem sublemniscal nucleus - TEL telencephalon - VLZ ventrolateral zone of ELL cortex - vped valvular peduncle     

Responses of neurons in the electrosensory lateral line lobe of the weakly electric fish <Emphasis Type="Italic">Gnathonemus petersii</Emphasis> to simple and complex electrosensory stimuli

Mormyrid fish use active electrolocation to detect and analyze objects. The electrosensory lateral line lobe in the brain receives input from electroreceptors and an efference copy of the command to discharge the electric organ. In curarized fish, we recorded extracellularly from neurons of the electrosensory lateral line lobe while stimulating in the periphery with either a local point stimulus or with a more natural whole-body stimulus. Two classes of neurons were found: (1) three types of E-cells, which were excited by a point stimulus; and (2) two types of I-cells, which were inhibited by point stimulus and responded with excitation to the electric organ corollary discharge. While all neurons responded to a point stimulus, only one out of two types of I-units and two of the three types of E-units changed their firing behavior to a whole-body stimulus or when an object was present. In most units, the responses to whole-body stimuli and to point stimuli differed substantially. Many electrosensory lateral line lobe units showed neural plasticity after prolonged sensory stimulation. However, plastic effects during whole body stimulation were often unlike those occurring during point stimuli, suggesting that under natural conditions electrosensory lateral line lobe network effects play an important role in shaping neural plasticity.     

An internal current source yields immunity of electrosensory information processing to unusually strong jamming in electric fish

Summary The electric organ of a fish represents an internal current source, and the largely isopotential nature of the body interior warrants that the current associated with the fish's electric organ discharges (EODs) recruits all electroreceptors on the fish's body surface evenly. Currents associated with the EODs of a neighbor, however, will not penetrate all portions of the fish's body surface equally and will barely affect regions where the neighbor's current flows tangentially to the skin surface. The computational mechanisms of the jamming avoidance response (JAR) in Eigenmannia exploit the uneven effects of a neighbor's EOD current to calculate the correct frequency difference between the two interfering EOD signals even if the amplitude of a neighbor's signal surpasses that of the fish's own signal by orders of magnitude. The particular geometry of the fish's own EOD current thus yields some immunity against the potentially confusing effects of unusually strong interfering EOD currents of neighbors.Abbreviations DF frequency difference - ELL electrosensory lateral line lobe - EOD electric organ discharge - JAR jamming avoidance response     

End buds: non-ampullary electroreceptors in adult lampreys

Summary Shared anatomical and physiological characters indicate that the low-frequency sensitive electrosensory system of lampreys is homologous with those of non-teleost fishes and amphibians. However, the ampullary electroreceptor organs which characterize all of these gnathostomes are not found in lampreys. Experimental anatomical and physiological studies reported here demonstrate that the epidermal end buds are the electroreceptors of adult lampreys.End buds, consisting of both sensory and supporting cells, are goblet-shaped with the top (25–60 m diameter) at the epidermal surface and the stem directed toward the dermis (Fig. 1A). Short lines or clusters of 2–8 end buds (Fig. 1B) are distributed over both trunk and head. Injections of horseradish peroxidase (HRP) into vitally-stained end buds labeled anterior lateral line afferents terminating in the ipsilateral dorsal nucleus (Fig. 2A) — the primary electrosensory nucleus of the lamprey medulla. Conversely, after HRP injection into the dorsal nucleus HRP-filled fibers and terminals were present on ipsilateral end buds (Fig. 2B).End buds are usually not visible without staining. However, in adult sea lampreys the presence of end buds was histologically confirmed in skin patches containing the receptive fields of electroreceptor fibers recorded in the anterior lateral line nerve. Additionally, in the rare instance of two silver lampreys in which end buds were visible without staining, electrosensory activity indistinguishable from that of the primary electroreceptor afferents was recorded from the end bud surface (Figs. 3, 4).End buds were initially characterized as chemoreceptors (Johnston 1902) but were later correctly advanced as lateralis receptors based on the presence of presynaptic dense bodies in the receptor cells (Whitear and Lane 1981). Unlike all other low-frequency electroreceptors, end buds lack canals. The receptor cells contact the epidermal surface and possess apical microvilli rather than the kinocilium of most gnathostomes with homologous electrosensory systems of the primitive (non-teleost) type.Larval lampreys and newly transformed adults lack end buds although at least the latter are electroreceptive. End buds, therefore, may be the form taken by electroreceptors only in the final portion of a lamprey's life.     

Elektroortung bei schwach elektrischen fischen: verzerrungen des elektrischen feldes von Gymnotus carapo und Gnathonemus petersii durch gegenstände und ihre wirkungen auf afferente aktivitäten

1. Discharges of the electric organ (EODs) of the weakly electric fishes Gymnotus carapo and Gnathonemus petersii produce alternative electric fields in the surrounding water. Equipotential contures are plotted in order to know the electric field in detail and to mimic it with a dipol model.
2. Either fields are deformed in a characteristic manner by conducting and nonconducting objects. These field distortions, opposite for conductors and nonconductors were measured by using several methods:
   1. Comparisons of undistorted and distorted field patterns issue variable distortions shapes depending on the objects' placement.
   2. Direct measurements of field distortions at a “receptor site” were made by several sets of electrodes.
   The effects measured depend on the conductivity of objects, their size and their distance from the electrical dipole the last being due to the inhomogenous field contures. As a general rule, plastic objects make the field increase, and metal objects decrease. However, considering all positions, either material produces complex field variations (di- and polyphasic curves).
3. Since responses of gymnotids' primary fibers as a function of plates' position strikingly fit to the curves of field distortion, the electroreceptors use obviously quite similar measurement conditions as the field registration arrangements. This evidence is discussed and compared with more general aspects of field distortions in homogenous fields.
4. The field effects decrease exponentially with the lateral distance of objects to the dipole. However, the reaction of primary fibers decreases rather linearly as the lateral distance of objects is increased.
5. Experiments with systematically changed stimulus frequency showed primary fibers to be exited over a much wider range of frequencies (0–1000 cps at least) than to be expected regarding the usual EOD discharge rate of 30–100 cps. However, the peak of the “tuning curve” at best frequency fits well into this range. On the other hand, the change of response over this frequency range is 10–20%, so that there is but minor improvement of the information by an increase of EOD frequency.

     

The coding of signals in the electric communication of the gymnotiform fish Eigenmannia: From electroreceptors to neurons in the torus semicircularis of the midbrain

Summary In the context of aggression and courtship, Eigenmannia repeatedly interrupts its electric organ discharges (EODs) These interruptions (Fig. 1) contain low-frequency components as well as high-frequency transients and, therefore, stimulate ampullary and tuberous electroreceptors, respectively (Figs. 2, 3). Information provided by these two classes of receptors is relayed along separate pathways, via the electrosensory lateral line lobe (ELL) of the hindbrain, to the dorsal torus semicircularis (TSd) of the midbrain. Some neurons of the torus receive inputs from both types of receptors (Figs. 14, 15), and some respond predominantly to EOD interruptions while being rather insensitive to other forms of signal modulations (Figs. 12, 13). This high selectivity appears to result from convergence and gating of inputs from individually less selective neurons.Abbreviations CP central posterior thalamic nucleus - Df frequency difference between neighbor's EOD and fish's own - DPn dorsal posterior nucleus (thalamus) - EOD electric organ discharge - ELL electrosensory lateral line lobe - JAR jamming avoidance response - LMR lateral mesencephalic reticular formation - nE nucleus electrosensorius - nEb nucleus electrosensorius, beat-related area - nE nucleus electrosensorius, area causing rise of EOD frequency - nE nucleus electrosensorius, area causing fall of EOD frequency - nEar nucleus electrosensorius-acusticolateralis area - NPd nucleus praeeminentialis, pars dorsalis - PPn prepacemaker nucleus - PT pretectal nucleus - SE nucleus subelectrosensorius - TeO optic tectum - TSd dorsal (electrosensory) torus semicircularis - TSv ventral (mechano-sensory and auditory) torus semicircularis     

Electroreception,electrogenesis and electric signal evolution

Electroreception, the capacity to detect external underwater electric fields with specialised receptors, is a phylogenetically widespread sensory modality in fishes and amphibians. In passive electroreception, a capacity possessed by c. 16% of fish species, an animal uses low-frequency-tuned ampullary electroreceptors to detect microvolt-range bioelectric fields from prey, without the need to generate its own electric field. In active electroreception (electrolocation), which occurs only in the teleost lineages Mormyroidea and Gymnotiformes, an animal senses its surroundings by generating a weak (< 1 V) electric-organ discharge (EOD) and detecting distortions in the EOD-associated field using high-frequency-tuned tuberous electroreceptors. Tuberous electroreceptors also detect the EODs of neighbouring fishes, facilitating electrocommunication. Several other groups of elasmobranchs and teleosts generate weak (< 10 V) or strong (> 50 V) EODs that facilitate communication or predation, but not electrolocation. Approximately 1.5% of fish species possess electric organs. This review has two aims. First, to synthesise our knowledge of the functional biology and phylogenetic distribution of electroreception and electrogenesis in fishes, with a focus on freshwater taxa and with emphasis on the proximate (morphological, physiological and genetic) bases of EOD and electroreceptor diversity. Second, to describe the diversity, biogeography, ecology and electric signal diversity of the mormyroids and gymnotiforms and to explore the ultimate (evolutionary) bases of signal and receptor diversity in their convergent electrogenic–electrosensory systems. Four sets of potential drivers or moderators of signal diversity are discussed. First, selective forces of an abiotic (environmental) nature for optimal electrolocation and communication performance of the EOD. Second, selective forces of a biotic nature targeting the communication function of the EOD, including sexual selection, reproductive interference from syntopic heterospecifics and selection from eavesdropping predators. Third, non-adaptive drift and, finally, phylogenetic inertia, which may arise from stabilising selection for optimal signal-receptor matching.     

Differential distribution of ampullary and tuberous processing in the torus semicircularis of Eigenmannia

Summary Gymnotiform electric fish sense low-and high frequency electric signals with ampullary and tuberous electroreceptors, respectively. We employed intracellular recording and labeling methods to investigate ampullary and tuberous information processing in laminae 1–5 of the dorsal torus semicircularis of Eigenmannia. Ampullary afferents arborized extensively in laminae 1–3 and, in some cases, lamina 7. Unlike tuberous afferents to the torus, ampullary afferents had numerous varicosities along their finest-diameter branches. Neurons that were primarily ampullary were found in lamina 3. Neurons primarily excited by tuberous stimuli were found in lamina 5 and, more rarely, in lamina 4. Cells that had dendrites in lamina 1–3 and 5 could be recruited by both ampullary and tuberous stimuli. These bimodal cells were found in lamina 4. During courtship, Eigenmannia produces interruptions of its electric organ discharges. These interruptions stimulate ampullary and tuberous receptors. The integration of ampullary and tuberous information may be important in the processing of these communication signals.Abbreviations JAR jamming avoidance response - EOD electric organ discharge - S1 sinusoidal signal mimicking fish's EOD - S2 jamming signal - Df frequency difference (S2-S1) or between a neighbor's EODs and fish's own EODs - CNS central nervous system     

Fish geometry and electric organ discharge determine functional organization of the electrosensory epithelium

Active electroreception in Gymnotus omarorum is a sensory modality that perceives the changes that nearby objects cause in a self generated electric field. The field is emitted as repetitive stereotyped pulses that stimulate skin electroreceptors. Differently from mormyriformes electric fish, gymnotiformes have an electric organ distributed along a large portion of the body, which fires sequentially. As a consequence shape and amplitude of both, the electric field generated and the image of objects, change during the electric pulse. To study how G. omarorum constructs a perceptual representation, we developed a computational model that allows the determination of the self-generated field and the electric image. We verify and use the model as a tool to explore image formation in diverse experimental circumstances. We show how the electric images of objects change in shape as a function of time and position, relative to the fish's body. We propose a theoretical framework about the organization of the different perceptive tasks made by electroreception: 1) At the head region, where the electrosensory mosaic presents an electric fovea, the field polarizing nearby objects is coherent and collimated. This favors the high resolution sampling of images of small objects and perception of electric color. Besides, the high sensitivity of the fovea allows the detection and tracking of large faraway objects in rostral regions. 2) In the trunk and tail region a multiplicity of sources illuminate different regions of the object, allowing the characterization of the shape and position of a large object. In this region, electroreceptors are of a unique type and capacitive detection should be based in the pattern of the afferents response. 3) Far from the fish, active electroreception is not possible but the collimated field is suitable to be used for electrocommunication and detection of large objects at the sides and caudally.     

Phantoms in the brain: Ambiguous representations of stimulus amplitude and timing in weakly electric fish

In wave-type weakly electric fish, two distinct types of primary afferent fibers are specialized for separately encoding modulations in the amplitude and phase (timing) of electrosensory stimuli. Time-coding afferents phase lock to periodic stimuli and respond to changes in stimulus phase with shifts in spike timing. Amplitude-coding afferents fire sporadically to periodic stimuli. Their probability of firing in a given cycle, and therefore their firing rate, is proportional to stimulus amplitude. However, the spike times of time-coding afferents are also affected by changes in amplitude; similarly, the firing rates of amplitude-coding afferents are also affected by changes in phase. Because identical changes in the activity of an individual primary afferent can be caused by modulations in either the amplitude or phase of stimuli, there is ambiguity regarding the information content of primary afferent responses that can result in ‘phantom’ modulations not present in an actual stimulus. Central electrosensory neurons in the hindbrain and midbrain respond to these phantom modulations. Phantom modulations can also elicit behavioral responses, indicating that ambiguity in the encoding of amplitude and timing information ultimately distorts electrosensory perception. A lack of independence in the encoding of multiple stimulus attributes can therefore result in perceptual illusions. Similar effects may occur in other sensory systems as well. In particular, the vertebrate auditory system is thought to be phylogenetically related to the electrosensory system and it encodes information about amplitude and timing in similar ways. It has been well established that pitch perception and loudness perception are both affected by the frequency and intensity of sounds, raising the intriguing possibility that auditory perception may also be affected by ambiguity in the encoding of sound amplitude and timing.     

Steroid influences upon the electrosensory system of weakly electric fish: direct effects upon discharge frequencies with indirect effects upon electroreceptor tuning

Summary Previous studies indicated that gonadal steroids can induce changes in both motor and sensory aspects of the electrosensory system of weakly electric fish: androgens decrease the electric organ discharge frequencies and electroreceptor best frequencies of the South American gymnotoidSternopygus. The relationship between these two effects, however, was not known. In the present study, electric organ discharges (EODs) ofSternopygus dariensis were eliminated by means of spinal cord transections. This was done in order to allow an independent assessment of the influences of gonadal steroids upon electroreceptor tuning and those structures in the CNS responsible for establishing the discharge frequency. Transection alone affected neither the rhythmic discharges of the pacemaker nucleus that normally controls the discharge frequency, nor the best frequencies of electroreceptors. Similarly, administration of the androgen 5-dihydrotestosterone (DHT) to transected animals also had no significant effect upon electroreceptor tuning. DHT did, however, cause significant decreases in the discharge rates of the pacemaker nucleus. Thus, the effects of gonadal steroids upon discharge frequencies in intact animals are a direct consequence of CNS influences, while effects upon electroreceptor tuning likely arise as a secondary consequence of the changed discharges of hormone-treated animals.Abbreviations ALLN anterior lateral line nerve - BF best frequency - DHT 5-dihydrotesterone - EOD electric organ discharge     

Effects of global electrosensory signals on motion processing in the midbrain of <Emphasis Type="Italic">Eigenmannia</Emphasis>

Wave-type weakly electric fish such as Eigenmannia produce continuous sinusoidal electric fields. When conspecifics are in close proximity, interaction of these electric fields can produce deficits in electrosensory function. We examined a neural correlate of such jamming at the level of the midbrain. Previous results indicate that neurons in the dorsal layers of the torus semicircularis can (1) respond to jamming signals, (2) respond to moving electrosensory stimuli, and (3) receive convergent information from the four sensory maps of the electrosensory lateral line lobe (ELL). In this study we recorded the intracellular responses of both tuberous and ampullary neurons to moving objects. Robust Gaussian-shaped or sinusoidal responses with half-height durations between 55 ms and 581 ms were seen in both modalities. The addition of ongoing global signals with temporal-frequencies of 5 Hz attenuated the responses to the moving object by 5 dB or more. In contrast, the responses to the moving object were not attenuated by the addition of signals with temporal frequencies of 20 Hz or greater. This occurred in both the ampullary and tuberous systems, despite the fact that the ampullary afferents to the torus originate in a single ELL map whereas the tuberous afferents emerge from three maps.     

Development of the jamming avoidance response and its morphological correlates in the gymnotiform electric fish, Eigenmannia.

The electric fish, Eigenmannia, will smoothly shift the frequency of its electric organ discharge away from an interfering electric signal. This shift in frequency is called the jamming avoidance response (JAR). In this article, we analyze the behavioral development of the JAR and the anatomical development of structures critical for the performance of the JAR. The JAR first appears when juvenile Eigenmannia are approximately 1 month old, at a total length of 13-18 mm. We have found that the establishment of much of the sensory periphery and of central connections precedes the onset of the JAR. We describe three aspects of the behavioral development of the JAR: (a) the onset and development of the behavior is closely correlated with size, not age; (b) the magnitude (in Hz) of the JAR increases with size until the juveniles display values within the adult range (10-20 Hz) at a total length of 25-30 mm; and (3) the JAR does not require prior experience or exposure to electrical signals. Raised in total electrical isolation from the egg stage, animals tested at a total length of 25 mm performed a correct JAR when first exposed to the stimulus. We examine the development of anatomical areas important for the performance of the JAR: the peripheral electrosensory system (mechano- and electroreceptors and peripheral nerves); and central electrosensory pathways and nuclei [the electrosensory lateral line lobe (ELL), the lateral lemniscus, the torus semicircularis, and the pace-maker nucleus]. The first recognizable structures in the developing electrosensory system are the peripheral neurites of the anterior lateral line nerve. The afferent nerves are established by day 2, which is prior to the formation of receptors in the epidermis. Thus, the neurites wait for their targets. This sequence of events suggests that receptor formation may be induced by innervation of primordial cells within the epidermis. Mechanoreceptors are first formed between day 3 and 4, while electroreceptors are first formed on day 7. Electroreceptor multiplication is observed for the first time at an age of 25 days and correlates with the onset of the JAR. The somata of the anterior lateral line nerve ganglion project afferents out to peripheral electroreceptors and also send axons centrally into the ELL. The first electroreceptive axons invade the ELL by day 6, and presumably a rough somatotopic organization and segmentation within the ELL may arise as early as day 7. Axonal projections from the ELL to the torus develop after day 18.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)     

Electrolocation in the platypus--some speculations

In the platypus, electroreceptors are located in rostro-caudal rows in skin of the bill, while mechanoreceptors are uniformly distributed across the bill. The electrosensory area of the cerebral cortex is contained within the tactile somatosensory area, and some cortical cells receive input from both electroreceptors and mechanoreceptors, suggesting a close association between the tactile and electric senses. Platypus can determine the direction of an electric source, perhaps by comparing differences in signal strength across the sheet of electroreceptors as the animal characteristically moves its head from side to side while hunting. The cortical convergence of electrosensory and tactile inputs suggests a mechanism for determining the distance of prey items which, when they move, emit both electrical signals and mechanical pressure pulses. Distance could be computed from the difference in time of arrival of the two signals. Much of the platypus' feeding is done by digging in the bottom of streams with the bill. Perhaps the electroreceptors could also be used to distinguish animate and inanimate objects in this situation where the mechanoreceptors would be continuously stimulated. Much of this is speculation, and there is still much to be learned about electroreception in the platypus and its fellow monotreme, the echidna.     

Capacitance detection in the wave-type electric fish Eigenmannia during active electrolocation

Weakly electric fish can detect nearby objects and analyse their electric properties during active electrolocation. Four individuals of the South American gymnotiform fish Eigenmannia sp., which emits a continuous wave-type electric signal, were tested for their ability to detect capacitive properties of objects and discriminate them from resistive properties. For individual fish, capacitive values of objects had to be greater than 0.22–1.7 nF (`lower threshold') and smaller than 120–680 nF (`upper threshold') in order to be detected. The capacitive values of natural objects fall well within this detection range. All fish trained could discriminate unequivocally between capacitive and resistive object properties. Thus, fish perceive capacitive properties as a separate object quality. The effects of different types of objects on the locally occurring electric signals which stimulate electroreceptors during electrolocation were examined. Purely resistive objects altered mainly local electric organ discharge (EOD) amplitude, but capacitive objects with values between about 0.5 and 600 nF changed the timing of certain EOD parameters (phase-shift) and EOD waveform. A mechanism for capacitance detection in wave-type electric fish based on time measurements is proposed and compared with the capacitance detection mechanism in mormyrid pulse-type fish, which is based on waveform measurements. Accepted: 31 July 1997     

Structure and function of neurons in the complex of the nucleus electrosensorius of the gymnotiform fish Eigenmannia: Detection and processing of electric signals in social communication

Summary The complex of the diencephalic nucleus electrosensorius (nE) provides an interface between the electrosensory processing performed by the torus semicircularis and the control of specific behavioral responses. The rostral portion of the nE comprises two subdivisions that differ in the response properties and projection patterns of their neurons. First, the nEb (Fig. 1 B), which contains neurons that are driven almost exclusively by beat patterns generated by the interference of electric organ discharges (EODs) of similar frequencies. Second, the area medial to the nEb, comprising the lateral pretectum (PT) and the nE-acusticolateralis region (nEar, Fig. 1 B-D), which contains neurons excited predominantly by EOD interruptions, signals associated with aggression and courtship. Neurons in the second area commonly receive convergent inputs originating from ampullary and tuberous electroreceptors, which respond to the low-frequency and high-frequency components of EOD interruptions, respectively. Projections of these neurons to hypothalamic areas linked to the pituitary may mediate modulations of a fish's endocrine state that are caused by exposure to EOD interruptions of its mate.Abbreviations a axon - ATh anterior thalamic nucleus - CCb corpus cerebelli - CE central nucleus of the inferior lobe - CP central posterior thalamic nucleus - Df frequency difference between neighbor's EOD and fish's own - DFl nucleus diffusus lateralis of the inferior lobe - DFm nucleus diffusus medialis of the inferior lobe - DTn dorsal tegmental nucleus - EOD electric organ discharge - G glomerular nucleus - Hc caudal hypothalamus - Hd dorsal hypothalamus - Hl lateral hypothalamus - Hv ventral hypothalamus - JAR jamming avoidance response - LL lateral lemniscus - MGT magnocellular tegmental nucleus - MLF medial longitudinal fasciculus - nB nucleus at the base of the optic tract - nE nucleus electrosensorius - nEar nucleus electrosensorius-acusticolateral region - nEb nucleus electrosensorius-beat related area - nE nucleus electrosensorius, area causing rise of EOD frequency - nE nucleus electrosensorius, area causing fall of EOD frequency - nLT nucleus tuberis lateralis - nLV nucleus lateralis valvulae - PC posterior commissure - Pd nucleus praeeminentialis, pars dorsalis - PeG periglomerular complex - PG preglomerular nucleus - PLm medial division of the perilemniscal nucleus - Pn pacemaker nucleus - PPn prepacemaker nucleus - PT pretectal nucleus - PTh prethalamic nucleus - R red nucleus - Sc suprachiasmatic nucleus - SE nucleus subelectrosensorius - TAd nucleus tuberis anterior-dorsal subdivision - TAv nucleus tuberis anterior-ventral subdivision - TeO optic tectum - TL torus longitudinalis - TSd dorsal (electrosensory) torus semicircularis - TSv ventral (mechanosensory and auditory) torus semicircularis - tTB tecto-bulbar tract - VCb cerebellar valvula - VP valvular peduncle - VPn nucleus of the valvular peduncle