Definition of the mycobacterial SOS box and use to identify LexA-regulated genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis

The bases of the mycobacterial SOS box important for LexA binding were determined by replacing each base with every other and examining the effect on the induction of a reporter gene following DNA damage. This analysis revealed that the SOS box was longer than originally thought by 2 bp in each half of the palindromic site. A search of the Mycobacterium tuberculosis genome sequence with the new consensus, TCGAAC(N)(4)GTTCGA, identified 4 sites which were perfect matches and 12 sites with a single mismatch which were predicted to bind LexA. Genes which could potentially be regulated by these SOS boxes were ascertained from their positions relative to the sites. Examination of expression data for these genes following DNA damage identified 12 new genes which are most likely regulated by LexA as well as the known M. tuberculosis DNA damage-inducible genes recA, lexA, and ruvC. Of these 12 genes, only 2 have a predicted function: dnaE2, a component of DNA polymerase III, and linB, which is similar to 1,3,4,6-tetrachloro-1,4-cylcohexadiene hydrolase. Curiously, of the remaining 10 genes predicted to be LexA regulated, 7 are members of the M. tuberculosis 13E12 repeat family, which has some of the characteristics of mobile elements.     

Widespread distribution of a lexA-regulated DNA damage-inducible multiple gene cassette in the Proteobacteria phylum

The SOS response comprises a set of cellular functions aimed at preserving bacterial cell viability in front of DNA injuries. The SOS network, negatively regulated by the LexA protein, is found in many bacterial species that have not suffered major reductions in their gene contents, but presents distinctly divergent LexA-binding sites across the Bacteria domain. In this article, we report the identification and characterization of an imported multiple gene cassette in the Gamma Proteobacterium Pseudomonas putida that encodes a LexA protein, an inhibitor of cell division (SulA), an error-prone polymerase (DinP) and the alpha subunit of DNA polymerase III (DnaE). We also demonstrate that these genes constitute a DNA damage-inducible operon that is regulated by its own encoded LexA protein, and we establish that the latter is a direct derivative of the Gram-positive LexA protein. In addition, in silico analyses reveal that this multiple gene cassette is also present in many Proteobacteria families, and that both its gene content and LexA-binding sequence have evolved over time, ultimately giving rise to the lexA lineage of extant Gamma Proteobacteria.     

Expression of canonical SOS genes is not under LexA repression in Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus

The here-reported identification of the LexA-binding sequence of Bdellovibrio bacteriovorus, a bacterial predator belonging to the delta-Proteobacteria, has made possible a detailed study of its LexA regulatory network. Surprisingly, only the lexA gene and a multiple gene cassette including dinP and dnaE homologues are regulated by the LexA protein in this bacterium. In vivo expression analyses have confirmed that this gene cassette indeed forms a polycistronic unit that, like the lexA gene, is DNA damage inducible in B. bacteriovorus. Conversely, genes such as recA, uvrA, ruvCAB, and ssb, which constitute the canonical core of the Proteobacteria SOS system, are not repressed by the LexA protein in this organism, hinting at a persistent selective pressure to maintain both the lexA gene and its regulation on the reported multiple gene cassette. In turn, in vitro experiments show that the B. bacteriovorus LexA-binding sequence is not recognized by other delta-Proteobacteria LexA proteins but binds to the cyanobacterial LexA repressor. This places B. bacteriovorus LexA at the base of the delta-Proteobacteria LexA family, revealing a high degree of conservation in the LexA regulatory sequence prior to the diversification and specialization seen in deeper groups of the Proteobacteria phylum.     

The majority of inducible DNA repair genes in Mycobacterium tuberculosis are induced independently of RecA

In many species of bacteria most inducible DNA repair genes are regulated by LexA homologues and are dependent on RecA for induction. We have shown previously by analysing the induction of recA that two mechanisms for the induction of gene expression following DNA damage exist in Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Whereas one of these depends on RecA and LexA in the classical way, the other mechanism is independent of both of these proteins and induction occurs in the absence of RecA. Here we investigate the generality of each of these mechanisms by analysing the global response to DNA damage in both wild-type M. tuberculosis and a recA deletion strain of M. tuberculosis using microarrays. This revealed that the majority of the genes that were induced remained inducible in the recA mutant stain. Of particular note most of the inducible genes with known or predicted functions in DNA repair did not depend on recA for induction. Amongst these are genes involved in nucleotide excision repair, base excision repair, damage reversal and recombination. Thus, it appears that this novel mechanism of gene regulation is important for DNA repair in M. tuberculosis.     

Separation of recombination and SOS response in Escherichia coli RecA suggests LexA interaction sites

RecA plays a key role in homologous recombination, the induction of the DNA damage response through LexA cleavage and the activity of error-prone polymerase in Escherichia coli. RecA interacts with multiple partners to achieve this pleiotropic role, but the structural location and sequence determinants involved in these multiple interactions remain mostly unknown. Here, in a first application to prokaryotes, Evolutionary Trace (ET) analysis identifies clusters of evolutionarily important surface amino acids involved in RecA functions. Some of these clusters match the known ATP binding, DNA binding, and RecA-RecA homo-dimerization sites, but others are novel. Mutation analysis at these sites disrupted either recombination or LexA cleavage. This highlights distinct functional sites specific for recombination and DNA damage response induction. Finally, our analysis reveals a composite site for LexA binding and cleavage, which is formed only on the active RecA filament. These new sites can provide new drug targets to modulate one or more RecA functions, with the potential to address the problem of evolution of antibiotic resistance at its root.     

Gene activation and DNA binding by Drosophila Ubx and abd-A proteins

The Ubx and abd-A gene products are required for proper development of thoracic and abdominal structures in Drosophila. We expressed LexA-Ubx and LexA-abdA fusion proteins in yeast. These proteins activated expression of target genes that carried either upstream LexA operators or upstream Ubx binding sites. Both proteins contain homeodomains. Experiments with mutant fusion proteins show that the homeodomain is not required for the proteins to form dimers or enter the nucleus, and that, when DNA binding is provided by the LexA moiety, the homeodomain is not required for gene activation. Our results suggest that the homeodomain is necessary for these proteins to bind Ubx sites, but that the homeodomain does not contact DNA exactly like bacterial helix-turn-helix proteins. Finally, our data suggest that gene activation by these proteins is a simple consequence of their binding to DNA, while negative gene regulation requires that these proteins act together with other Drosophila gene products.