CK19和MC在肺癌患者胸水中的表达及意义

目的探讨CK19和MC在肺癌患者胸水中的诊断价值。方法应用免疫细胞化学方法(S-P)研究44例肺癌患者胸水中的癌细胞和26例肺良性疾病胸水中的反应性间皮细胞的表达。结果CK19在肺癌患者胸水中的阳性率95.5%(42/44)明显高于在良性胸水中的阳性率7.7%(2/26),差异非常显著(P<0.01);而MC在良性胸水中的阳性率96.2%(25/26)明显高于在肺癌患者胸水中的阳性率22.7%(10/44),差异也非常显著(P<0.01);当CK19和MC联合应用时为最佳选择,其敏感性和特异性分别高达100%和88.5%。结论CK19和MC对肺癌患者胸水中癌细胞的诊断及鉴别诊断具有重要的临床应用价值。     

Lectin microarrays differentiate carcinoma cells from reactive mesothelial cells in pleural effusions

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic utility of lectin microarrays in pleural effusions of patients with lung cancer. A lectin microarray, LTL, PSA, LCA, UEA-1, AAL, MAL-I, MAL-II, SNA, WGA, ECL, DSA, STL, SWGA, HPA, ConA, GNA, HHL, BPL, EEL, Jacalin, WFA, ACL, MPL, DBA, SBA, was used to determine the glycoprotein profile of cells in pleural effusions from patients with lung cancer (54 cases), and with benign lung disease (54 cases). The A549 cell line, used as an experimental control, was positive for AAL, MAL-I, WGA, STL, Jacalin and ACL binding. Adenocarcinoma cells in pleural effusions were positive for ECL, DSA, AAL, MAL-I, WGA, STL, Jacalin, and ACL binding. AAL, WGA, and ACL positive binding was the most common, found in 54, 48, and 38 samples, respectively. ECL and DSA binding was positive in only 4 samples. In comparison, reactive mesothelial cells displayed positive binding for all markers in the microarray panel. SNA and AAL positive binding was detected in the majority of samples; 50/54 and 48/54 samples, respectively. Positive binding of DBA, MAL-II and EEL was present in only 2, 4 and 4 samples, respectively. SNA binding had the highest sensitivity (92.6 %), specificity (100 %), and accuracy (96.3 %). SNA may be used as a biomarker to distinguish reactive mesothelial cells from adenocarcinoma cells. The lectin microarrays proved able to distinguish carcinoma cells from reactive mesothelial cells in pleural effusions.     

TTF-1和HBME-1在肺癌患者胸水中的表达及意义

目的探讨TTF-1和HBME-1在肺癌患者胸水中的诊断价值。方法应用免疫细胞化学方法（S-P）研究51例原发性肺癌患者和10例继发性肺癌患者胸水中的癌细胞及44例肺良性疾病胸水中反应性间皮细胞的表达。结果TTF-1在原发性肺癌患者胸水中的阳性率为78.4%（40/51）,而在继发性肺癌患者和肺良性疾病患者的胸水中未见阳性表达;HBME-1在肺良性疾病患者胸水中的阳性率95.5%（42/44）明显高于在原发性肺癌患者胸水中25.5%（13/51）和继发性肺癌患者胸水的阳性率20.0%（2/10）;在不同病理类型原发性肺癌患者胸水中,TTF-1的阳性率在腺癌组90.7%（39/43）明显高于鳞癌组12.5%（1/8）;当TTF-1和HBME-1联合应用时为最佳选择,其检测肺癌患者胸水的敏感性和特异性分别高达96.7%和95.5%。结论TTF-1和HBME-1对原发性、继发性肺癌患者胸水中癌细胞的诊断及鉴别诊断具有重要的临床应用价值。     

Characterizing subpopulations of neoplastic cells in serous effusions. The role of immunocytochemistry

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the role of immunochemistry in serous effusions. STUDY DESIGN: We analyzed cell blocks of 18 pleural and 18 peritoneal effusions diagnosed as malignant (18), benign (14) and suspicious (4). They were immunostained by the avidin-biotin complex method with a panel of four monoclonal antibodies--CEA, Ber-EP4, LeuM1 (CD15) and p53--and, for lectins (Ulex europaeus) UEA-l, ConA and ConBr. RESULTS: Seventeen of the 18 cases of adenocarcinoma were positive for CEA (95%), 12 (66.6%) for Ber-EP4, 11 (61%) for CD15 and 11 (61%) for p53. Twelve of the 18 (66.6%) were positive for UEA-1, CEA, Ber-EP4 and CD15. UEA-1 did not react with mesothelial cells. p53 Gave a positive reaction in only one case, reactive mesothelial cells. ConA and ConBr reacted indiscriminately with benign and malignant cells; thus, it was not useful in distinguishing between these cells. CONCLUSION: In this context no antibody used alone is reliable for corroborating a diagnosis, but the selective use of a small panel of three markers (CEA, Ber-EP4 and LeuM1) can be very useful in solving diagnostic difficulties in the cytodiagnosis of serous effusions.     

Distinction between carcinoma cells and mesothelial cells in serous effusions. Usefulness of immunohistochemistry

The usefulness of an immunoperoxidase battery to distinguish carcinomatous from benign effusions was examined. Cell block sections from 90 previously diagnosed effusions were stained with antibodies to Leu-M1, B72.3, epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and vimentin. The 90 cases comprised 69 carcinomas (23 mammary, 16 ovarian, 10 pulmonary, 7 gastrointestinal [GI] and 13 others), 2 malignant mesotheliomas and 19 cases with reactive mesothelial cells only. EMA and vimentin were the most useful markers for distinguishing carcinoma cells from reactive mesothelial cells. EMA reacted with 86% of the carcinomas while vimentin reacted with 90% of the reactive cases. Leu-M1, B72.3 and CEA, although generally less sensitive than EMA, were also helpful in this regard. Additionally, the use of Leu-M1 and CEA together may help to distinguish pulmonary from GI carcinomas.     

Cytological criteria of endometrial lesions with emphasis on stromal and epithelial cell clusters: result of 8 years of experience with intrauterine sampling

Objective:  There are a number of unresolved issues in endometrial cytology. They include the significance of nuclear atypia for the diagnosis of grade1 adenocarcinoma (G1AC) and atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH), cytological criteria of endometrial hyperplasia without atypia, and recognition of stromal cell cluster (SC) and its distinction from epithelial cell cluster (EC).
Methods:  We examined nuclear atypia, SC and EC in typical cases of five categories: normal endometrium (NEM), simple endometrial hyperplasia without atypia (SEH), complex endometrial hyperplasia without atypia (CEH), G1AC and grade2 adenocarcinoma (G2AC). We classified EC into four types: simple EC (SPEC), large regular EC (LREC), large irregular EC (LIEC) and small irregular EC (SIEC). Based on the results, we developed criteria of endometrial cytology and have evaluated 13 639 cases over 8 years.
Results:  Nuclear atypia was significantly more frequent in G2AC than in any of the other four categories ( P  <   0.001). SC was significantly more frequent in NEM and SEH than in the other three categories ( P  <   0.001). G1AC and G2AC showed significantly higher frequency of LIEC than the other three categories ( P  <   0.001). CEH exhibited significantly higher frequency of LREC than the four categories ( P  <   0.001). The sensitivity and the specificity was 88.8% and 99.0% respectively.
Conclusions:  We could diagnose G1AC, G2AC and CEH with high accuracy using the established criteria mainly based on SC and EC. We think that the criteria may facilitate an effective screening and an objective interpretation of endometrial samples.     

免疫细胞化学方法对胸腔积液中恶性肿瘤细胞的分类与诊断

目的应用免疫细胞化学对胸腔积液中的肺非小细胞癌分类与恶性间皮瘤的鉴别诊断。方法利用液基薄层细胞学自动涂片技术方法对筛查出的胸腔积液可疑瘤细胞及瘤细胞标本1158例进行细胞包埋连续切片,分别作肺非小细胞癌（NSCLC）肿瘤细胞标记物CK7、CK5＆6、TTF-1、E—Ca及恶性间皮瘤标记物MC（MesothelialCell,MC）、CR（Calfetinin,CR）、P53、Vimentin免疫细胞化学染色。结果1158例胸腔积液患者确诊为肺腺癌581例,鳞癌509例,腺鳞癌48例,恶性间皮瘤20例。TTF-1在腺癌中有明显高表达,阳性表达率为92．43％;CK58L6在鳞癌中有明显高表达,阳性表达率为97．45％;MC、CR在恶性间皮瘤中有明显高表达,阳性表达率为100．00％和95．00％。结论液基细胞学与免疫细胞化学技术相结合在胸腔积液鉴别诊断中有很重要的临床意义,CK7、CK58L6、TTF-1、E—ca联合应用可用于胸腔积液中NSCLC之间的分类与诊断,CK58L6、MC、CR、P53、Vimentin联合应用可用于胸腔积液中间皮瘤的定性诊断,值得在临床细胞病理学诊断中推广应用。     

Utility of HBME-1 immunostaining in serous effusions

Utility of HBME-1 immunostaining in serous effusions
HBME-1 is an anti-mesothelial cell monoclonal antibody derived from human mesothelioma cells. We investigated 227 body cavity effusions to test its utility in differentiating mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma. HBME-1 outlined cell membranes in non-neoplastic mesothelial cells. Thick surface staining was observed on all mesotheliomas. HBME-1 reactivity was also detected in 24% of metastatic carcinomatous effusions. Most ovarian carcinomas (83%) reacted with this antibody, showing surface staining. Cytoplasmic HBME-1 immunoreactivity was observed in a small proportion of non-ovarian adenocarcinomas (14%). Despite its limited specificity, HBME-1 might be added to the battery of other markers of epithelial and/or mesothelial differentiation to be used in cases of suspected mesothelioma. Evaluation of suspicious cells should include careful study of the pattern of immunostaining.     

Deep-seated rectal/anal basaloid carcinoma: useful immunocytochemistry in rare squamous cell carcinoma variants

Objectives:  To report the cytological aspects of ano-rectal basaloid carcinoma (BC) variant in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) conventional and liquid-based cytology (LBC), in a series of 10 cases of deep-seated squamous cell carcinomas (SCC), and to discuss the diagnostic difficulties in interpreting the morphology and immunocytochemical findings.
Methods:  Ten cases of EUS-FNA smears and LBC specimens of deep-seated pelvic masses were retrospectively collected from January 2001 to November 2006.
Results:  Ten EUS-FNA specimen cases were SCC, eight corresponding to usual SCC and two to BC-variant. Of these two cases, only one was correctly diagnosed by EUS-FNA specimen, whereas in the second case, the initial cytological diagnosis was poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma and the final diagnosis of basaloid carcinoma variant was established on surgical resection. Immunocytochemistry (ICC) using CK7, CK20 and CK34βe12 on FNA specimens confirmed the diagnosis retrospectively.
Conclusion:  The diagnosis of basaloid variant of SCC in a rectal location can be very difficult, both on account of the uncommon location and because of the low specificity of morphological aspects on EUS-FNA smears. The immunocytochemical technique, including a limited spectrum of keratins (CK7, CK20, CK34βe12, and p63) is necessary to avoid this diagnostic pitfall.     

Immunohistochemical analysis of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UbcH10 in lung cancer: a useful tool for diagnosis and therapy

The ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (UbcH10) plays important roles in the regulation of cell cycle progression. Recently, UbcH10 expression has been demonstrated in several human and experimental tumors, and proteasome inhibitors have been tested in trials for pulmonary neoplasms; however, the underlying mechanisms as well as the clinicopathological relevance of UbcH10 in the genesis and progression of lung cancer remain largely unknown. Therefore, the authors evaluated the expression of UbcH10 in human lung cancer and evaluated its possible diagnostic and prognostic use. They found that most cases of lung adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and large cell and small cell carcinoma were positive for UbcH10. The expression levels of UbcH10 progressively increased with decreasing degree of tumor differentiation. There was a statistically significant difference of UbcH10 positivity between grade I/III of lung adenocarcinoma (p=0.013) and squamous cell carcinoma (p=0.002). No significant differences were found between histological types (p=0.072). In the case of cell blocks prepared from pleural effusions, inflammatory and reactive mesothelial elements did not show appreciable UbcH10 expression, whereas neoplastic cells exhibited clear UbcH10 positivity. The results suggest that UbcH10 might represent a new and promising diagnostic and prognostic marker in both histologic and cytologic specimens of lung cancer.     

Immunophenotyping of Mesothelial Cells and Carcinoma Cells With Monoclonal Antibodies to Cytokeratins, Vimentin, Cea and Ema Improves the Cytodiagnosis of Serous Effusions

This paper presents an immunocytochemical study performed on cytocentrifuged deposits from 109 peritoneal and pleural effusions including 20 transudates, 43 malignant metastatic effusions and 46 effusions containing atypical cells, unidentifiable as reactive mesothelial or malignant epithelial cells on the classical morphological criteria. A panel of four monoclonal antibodies (MAb) was used, including KL1 directed to cytokeratins (KER), V9 to vimentin (VIM), NEO 723 to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and E29 to epithelial membrane antigen (EMA). In most transudates the reactive mesothelial cells coexpressed VIM and KER with a ring-like pattern for the latter proteins. In contrast, they were unreactive to anti-CEA and weakly and inconsistently reactive to anti-EMA. In malignant effusions, most carcinoma cells coexpressed EMA, CEA and KER with a predominant diffuse cytoplasmic pattern for the latter. Only a few malignant epithelial cells from five metastatic adenocarcinomas weakly expressed VIM. When used on the 46 effusions with unidentifiable cells, the panel of MAb allowed reactive mesothelial cells and malignant epithelial cells to be distinguished from each other in 39 of 46 cases (85%).     

DNA analysis of malignant effusions. Comparison with cytologic diagnosis and carcinoembryonic antigen content.

Twenty-three consecutive malignant effusions from 19 patients submitted for cytologic examination were analyzed for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) content and for DNA analysis by flow cytometry. The study was undertaken to determine if the addition of DNA analysis would improve the sensitivity of cytologic diagnosis and CEA assay. CEA examination was performed on Papanicolaou-stained smears and hematoxylin-and-eosin-stained cell blocks. Final diagnoses were correlated with histologic examination (four patients), clinical and radiologic studies, and follow-up. The malignant effusions in 19 patients were secondary to carcinoma of the breast (5), lung (5), ovary (1), endometrium (1), mucinous carcinoma of the colon (1), unknown primary (1), extraovarian papillary carcinoma (1), mesothelioma (2) and large cell lymphoma (2). The sensitivity of cytologic diagnosis was 100% and specificity 100%. DNA aneuploidy, defined as the presence of two separate peaks in the histogram, was present in 7 of 23 fluids (sensitivity, 30%). Four fluids had insufficient cells for analysis, and one histogram showed debris (following chemotherapy). DNA aneuploidy was detected in effusions secondary to carcinoma of the breast (4), lung (1) and lymphoma (2). Using 5 ng/mL as the cutoff, the sensitivity of CEA was 68%. DNA analysis of cells in malignant effusions is less sensitive than cytologic diagnosis, and CEA assay and is not recommended for routine use in the diagnosis of malignant effusions.     

Ultrastructure of pleural mesothelioma and pulmonary adenocarcinoma in malignant effusions as compared with reactive mesothelial cells.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the ultrastructural features of diffuse malignant pleural mesothelioma cells in cytologic specimens from pleural effusions. STUDY DESIGN: We retrospectively studied 35 pleural effusions: 12 diffuse malignant pleural mesotheliomas (8 epithelial type, 4 biphasic type), 12 pulmonary adenocarcinomas and 11 cases of reactive mesothelial cells. RESULTS: In the cytoplasm, reactive and malignant mesothelial cells had more-abundant intermediate filaments (P < .05, P < .01) and fewer free ribosomes (P < .001, P < .001) than adenocarcinoma cells. Reactive mesothelial cells had fewer mitochondria than mesothelioma cells (P < .05). Mesothelioma cells had longer, thinner microvilli on the cell surfaces (P < .001); length/diameter ratios of microvilli were 19.1 +/- 7.0 (mesothelioma) vs. 9.1 +/- 2.2 (adenocarcinoma) and 9.2 +/- 2.4 (mesothelial cells). Giant intercellular junctions (desmosomes or desmosomelike structures > 1 micron in length) were found in eight cases of mesothelioma. Core filaments or rootlets in microvilli were present in two cases of adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSION: Because cytologic specimens from pleural effusions were easy to obtain, we think ultrastructural cytology is useful in distinguishing mesothelioma from adenocarcinoma and benign effusions.     

The value of the immunoperoxidase slide assay in the diagnosis of malignant pleural effusions in breast cancer

Whether immunocytochemical studies of malignant pleural effusions due to breast cancer would increase the diagnostic yield as compared with conventional effusion cytology was examined in 30 cases with biopsy-proven metastatic spread to the pleura. Conventional cytology was performed on air-dried smears as well as on cytocentrifuge preparations stained with the May-Grünwald-Giemsa stain. Immunocytochemistry was performed with monoclonal antibodies against carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), epithelial membrane antigen (EMA) and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and the peroxidase-antiperoxidase technique on glass slides after Ficoll-Hypaque centrifugation. By conventional cytology, 13 cases (43%) were positive for malignant cells, 6 cases (20%) were suspicious, and 11 cases (37%) were negative. In marked contrast, all 30 cases were immunocytologically positive for malignancy. Tumor cells in all cases demonstrated a positive reaction for EMA. Some mesothelial cells were also positive for EMA, but their reaction pattern was clearly distinguishable from that of the tumor cells. Twenty-one cases (70%) also showed CEA-positive tumor cells; mesothelial cells never reacted with CEA. Some tumor cells showed a loss of HLA expression. In conclusion, this immunocytologic method can be recommended as a routine procedure for greatly increasing the diagnostic yield of cytology in pleural effusions due to breast cancer.     

血清细胞角蛋白19、神经元特异性烯醇化酶及鳞状上皮细胞癌抗原在小细胞肺癌诊断及病情评估中的作用研究

摘要 目的：分析血清细胞角蛋白19（CK19）、神经元特异性烯醇化酶（NSE）及鳞状上皮细胞癌抗原（SCCA）在小细胞肺癌诊断及病情评估中的作用。方法：选择我院自2020年1月至2022年7月收治的85例小细胞肺癌患者作为观察组,另选同期的85例肺部良性疾病患者作为对照组。检测两组血清CK19、NSE、SCCA表达水平,比较两组血清CK19、NSE、SCCA表达水平及其阳性率,使用ROC曲线下面积（AUC）分析上述指标对小细胞肺癌的诊断效能,观察小细胞肺癌不同分期患者血清CK19、NSE、SCCA表达水平的差异性,分析观察组治疗前后血清CK19、NSE、SCCA表达水平的变化情况。结果：观察组血清CK19、NSE、SCCA表达水平均较对照组高（P＜0.05）;观察组血清CK19、NSE和SCCA的阳性率均较对照组高（P＜0.05）;经ROC曲线分析,血清CK19、NSE联合SCCA诊断小细胞肺癌的敏感度为91.23 %,特异度为84.67 %,AUC为0.910;在85例小细胞肺癌患者中,临床分期为局限期33例、广泛期52例;广泛期患者血清CK19、NSE、SCCA表达水平均高于局限期患者（P＜0.05）。结论：血清CK19、NSE联合SCCA诊断小细胞肺癌的效能较好,三者均与患者病情严重程度有关,有利于此病的早期诊断和病情评估,值得进一步研究应用。     

Diagnostic utility of GLUT-1 expression in the cytologic evaluation of serous fluids

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the extent to which adenocarcinomas in body cavity fluids express GLUT-1 in comparison to currently available markers for adenocarcinomas. STUDY DESIGN: Archival paraffin-embedded cell blocks of serous fluids from 25 cases of benign effusions containing reactive mesothelial cells and 39 cases of malignant effusions with metastatic adenocarcinoma (11 ovarian, 11 pulmonary, 9 gastrointestinal and 8 breast) were retrieved from the surgical pathology files. All cases were stained with antibodies for GLUT-1, Ber-Ep4, B72.3 and CEA. Positive staining was defined as distinct linear membrane staining for GLUT-1 and Ber-EP4, cytoplasmic staining for CEA, and cytoplasmic or membrane staining for B72.3. Strong staining in at least 10% of the tumor cells was required in order to consider the case positive for the particular marker. RESULTS: GLUT-1 was expressed in 72% (28 of 39) of cases of malignant effusions: 100% (11 of 11) from the ovary, 91% (10 of 11) from the lung, 67% (6 of 9) from the gastrointestinal tract and 12% (1 of 8) from the breast. None (0 of 25) of the benign effusions expressed GLUT-1. Malignant effusions expressed CEA in 74% (29 of 39), Ber-Ep4 in 85% (33 of 39), and B72.3 in 62% (24 of 39). Benign effusions expressed CEA in 3 cases and B72.3 in 2 cases. CONCLUSION: GLUT-1 is a useful marker that can be applied to cytologic specimens. It can be used as a reliable component of an antibody panel to distinguish reactive mesothelial cells from metastatic adenocarcinoma in particular adenocarcinomas of body cavity effusions, in particular adenocarcinomas of ovarian and pulmonary origin.     

Malignant pleural effusions due to small cell carcinoma of the lung. An immunocytochemical cell-surface analysis of lymphocytes and tumor cells

Thirteen malignant pleural effusions due to small cell carcinoma (SCC) of the lung were immunocytochemically studied using the peroxidase-antiperoxidase adhesive slide assay for the determination of cell surface antigens. A panel of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) was used to determine the lymphocyte subpopulations and the reactivity of the tumor cells. Of the lymphocytes, 87 +/- 1% were CD3+ T cells, with 72 +/- 10% CD4+ helper/inducer T cells and 20 +/- 5% CD8+ suppressor/cytotoxic T cells. Only a minority of T lymphocytes were activated in terms of expressing the surface markers CD38 and HLA-DR. The distribution of the lymphocyte subpopulations was not significantly different from the distribution in other malignant and nonmalignant pleural diseases previously studied, indicating that the reaction pattern of the lymphocytes in the pleural cavity is similar in different diseases. The tumor cells from all cases were positive for LeuM1, CD16 and HLA-DR; 10 of 11 cases were positive for HEA-125, Sam 2 and Sam 10. Positivity for epithelial membrane antigen was observed in 11 cases, for OKT9 in 8 cases and for carcinoembryonic antigen in 6 cases. A total or partial loss of the reactivity with HLA-1 was found in nine cases. The reactivity pattern of the tumor cells with the MAbs used in this study is not specific for SCC of the lung because other carcinoma cells also reacted with these markers. Additional morphologic criteria, such as cell size and cell configuration, are needed to recognize the immunocytochemically positive-reacting cells as tumor cells from SCC of the lung. However, the immunostaining allows a better identification of the tumor cells, especially in cases with a small quantity of tumor cells.     

Diagnostic interest of the monoclonal antibody CA1 in malignant pleural effusion

The Ca1 antibody was used in an immunohistochemical procedure on smears of cells from 40 patients with malignant pleural effusion. The control group consisted of 25 benign pleural effusions with a high percentage of reactive mesothelial cells. The Ca1 Mc Ab was positive in 19 (79%) of the 24 pleural effusions with positive malignant cytology. In all the benign cases the Ca1 Mc Ab was negative (100% specificity). The Ca1 Mc Ab detected malignant mesothelial cells in two cases and was negative with reactive mesothelial cells and other nucleated cells present in the pleural effusion. We conclude that the Ca1 antibody offers a useful diagnostic method for malignant pleural effusions, when the morphological interpretation is doubtful.     

Diagnostic value of clot examination for malignant cells in serous effusions

Objective:  To assess the diagnostic value of clot examination for satisfactory processing and confirmation of malignancy in serous effusions in routine cytological evaluation and compare the results with those of conventional smear and cell block preparations.
Methodology:  Body cavity fluids ( n  = 600) received in our laboratory were processed according to a pre-designed protocol for the study as follows: Day1: on receipt of the specimen, smears were made and a cell block was prepared from the sediment. Day2: after overnight sample storage of the remaining specimen at 2–8 °C all fluids were examined for the presence of a clot at the bottom of the container. Fluids in which clot had formed were fixed in formalin. The clot was then placed on a lens paper, wrapped and processed routinely. Diagnostic yields were compared.
Results:  In this study, we included 600 cases of serous fluids from pleural, pericardial and peritoneal effusions. In 73% ( n  = 437) of samples, clot formation was seen, while in 27%, ( n  = 163) no clot had formed. Routine smear and cell block preparations showed malignant cells in 9.6% ( n  = 42). However, with the addition of the clot preparation, the number of cases in which atypical/malignant cells were seen increased from 42 to 85 (19.4%), with a P  < 0.001. Special stains and immunohistochemistry (IHC) were also performed on clot preparations in 10 difficult cases.
Conclusion:  Clot preparation from body cavity fluids on the second day can be used as an adjunct to smear and routine cell block preparation to improve the accuracy and yield of the cytological diagnosis and may also be of great help for special studies such as IHC staining.     

Expression of matrix metalloproteinases-2 and -9 by cells isolated from the peritoneal fluid of women with ovarian carcinoma

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the level of expression of matrix metalloproteinases (MMP)-2 and -9 by cells isolated from the peritoneal fluid of women with ovarian carcinoma. STUDY DESIGN: Tumor tissue specimens and cells isolated from peritoneal fluid from 20 patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma were examined for MMP-2 and -9 expression using immunostaining. Six benign peritoneal effusions containing mesothelial cells were also included in the study. RESULTS: Expression of both MMP-2 and -9 was noted in cancer cells in peritoneal fluid of all cases studied. Peritoneal fluid cancer cells showed increased expression of both MMP-2 and -9 relative to mesothelial cell expression of these MMPs. Positive immunoreactivity of these MMPs in primary tumor tissues was confirmed by immunohistochemistry. CONCLUSION: Our findings suggest that both MMP-2 and -9 are frequently overexpressed in ovarian cancer cells disseminated in the peritoneal cavity and that determination of cellular MMP-2 and -9 expression could be useful in distinguishing cancer cells from mesothelial cells in peritoneal fluid cytologic specimens from women with ovarian epithelial carcinoma.