Effect of double-stranded RNA and interferon on the antiviral activity of Atlantic salmon cells against infectious salmon anemia virus and infectious pancreatic necrosis virus

Type I interferons (IFN) establish an antiviral state in vertebrate cells by inducing expression of Mx and other antiviral proteins. We have studied the effect of Atlantic salmon interferon-like activity (AS-IFN) and poly I:C on the Mx protein expression and antiviral activity against infectious salmon anaemia virus (ISAV) and infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV) in the Atlantic salmon cell lines SHK-1 and TO. The double-stranded RNA poly I:C is an inducer of type I IFN in vertebrates. A cell cytotoxicity assay and measurements of virus yield were used to measure protection of cells against virus infection. Maximal induction of Mx protein in TO and SHK-1 cells occurred 48 h after poly I:C stimulation and 24 h after AS-IFN stimulation. TO cells pretreated with AS-IFN or poly I:C were protected from infection with IPNV 24 to 96 h after stimulation. Poly I:C or AS-IFN induced a minor protection against ISAV infection in SHK-1 cells, but no protection was induced against ISAV in TO cells. Western blot analysis showed that ISAV induced expression of Mx protein in TO and SHK-1 cells whereas IPNV did not induce Mx protein expression. These results suggest that ISAV and IPNV have very different sensitivities to IFN-induced antiviral activity and have developed different strategies to avoid the IFN-system of Atlantic salmon. Moreover, Atlantic salmon Mx protein appears not to inhibit replication of ISAV.     

An antiviral state induced in Chinook salmon embryo cells (CHSE-214) by transfection with the double-stranded RNA poly I:C

Type I interferons (IFN alpha and beta) convert vertebrate cells into an antiviral state by inducing expression of proteins that inhibit virus replication. In humans and mice, Mx proteins constitute one family of interferon-induced antiviral proteins. Mx genes have recently been cloned from Atlantic salmon and rainbow trout. Moreover, double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) and type I IFN-like activity have been shown to induce Mx protein in salmonid cells. Chinook salmon embryo cells (CHSE-214 cells) have been suggested to have a defect in the IFN-system because the dsRNA polyinosinic polycytidylic acid (poly I:C) failed to induce an antiviral state in the cells. We have studied this phenomenon more closely in the present work. CHSE-214 cells were either transfected with poly I:C or incubated with poly I:C without transfection reagent. The cells were then studied for Mx protein expression and protection against infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV) infection. The results showed that cells transfected with poly I:C were protected from IPNV infection, whilst cells incubated with poly I:C were not protected. Cells transfected with the double-stranded DNA poly dI:dC were also not protected against IPNV. Mx protein was expressed in CHSE-214 cells upon transfection with poly I:C, but not after incubation with poly I:C alone. Stimulation of CHSE-214 cells with supernatants from cells transfected with poly I:C, induced protection against IPNV, indicating production of type I IFN-like activity. These results suggest that CHSE-214 cells in fact are able to produce type I IFN, but may have defects in the mechanisms mediating uptake of poly I:C or may degrade unprotected poly I:C.     

Human MxA Protein Confers Resistance to Semliki Forest Virus and Inhibits the Amplification of a Semliki Forest Virus-Based Replicon in the Absence of Viral Structural Proteins

Mx proteins form a small family of interferon (IFN)-induced GTPases with potent antiviral activity against various negative-strand RNA viruses. To examine the antiviral spectrum of human MxA in homologous cells, we stably transfected HEp-2 cells with a plasmid directing the expression of MxA cDNA. HEp-2 cells are permissive for many viruses and are unable to express endogenous MxA in response to IFN. Experimental infection with various RNA and DNA viruses revealed that MxA-expressing HEp-2 cells were protected not only against influenza virus and vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) but also against Semliki Forest virus (SFV), a togavirus with a single-stranded RNA genome of positive polarity. In MxA-transfected cells, viral yields were reduced up to 1,700-fold, and the degree of inhibition correlated well with the expression level of MxA. Furthermore, expression of MxA prevented the accumulation of 49S RNA and 26S RNA, indicating that SFV was inhibited early in its replication cycle. Very similar results were obtained with MxA-transfected cells of the human monocytic cell line U937. The results demonstrate that the antiviral spectrum of MxA is not restricted to negative-strand RNA viruses but also includes SFV, which contains an RNA genome of positive polarity. To test whether MxA protein exerts its inhibitory activity against SFV in the absence of viral structural proteins, we took advantage of a recombinant vector based on the SFV replicon. The vector contains only the coding sequence for the viral nonstructural proteins and the bacterial LacZ gene, which was cloned in place of the viral structural genes. Upon transfection of vector-derived recombinant RNA, expression of the β-galactosidase reporter gene was strongly reduced in the presence of MxA. This finding indicates that viral components other than the structural proteins are the target of MxA action.     

Mx is dispensable for interferon-mediated resistance of chicken cells against influenza A virus

The type I interferon (IFN) system plays an important role in antiviral defense against influenza A viruses (FLUAV), which are natural chicken pathogens. Studies of mice identified the Mx1 protein as a key effector molecule of the IFN-induced antiviral state against FLUAV. Chicken Mx genes are highly polymorphic, and recent studies suggested that an Asn/Ser polymorphism at amino acid position 631 determines the antiviral activity of the chicken Mx protein. By employing chicken embryo fibroblasts with defined Mx-631 polymorphisms and retroviral vectors for the expression of Mx isoforms in chicken cells and embryonated eggs, we show here that neither the 631Asn nor the 631Ser variant of chicken Mx was able to confer antiviral protection against several lowly and highly pathogenic FLUAV strains. Using a short interfering RNA (siRNA)-mediated knockdown approach, we noted that the antiviral effect of type I IFN in chicken cells was not dependent on Mx, suggesting that some other IFN-induced factors must contribute to the inhibition of FLUAV in chicken cells. Finally, we found that both isoforms of chicken Mx protein appear to lack GTPase activity, which might explain the observed lack of antiviral activity.     

Induction of Mx protein by interferon and double-stranded RNA in salmonid cells

Mx protein is one of several antiviral proteins that are induced by the type I interferons (IFN), IFNalpha and beta, in mammals. In this work induction of a 76 kDa Mx protein by double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) or type I IFN-like activity in Atlantic salmon macrophages, Atlantic salmon fibroblast cells (AS cells) and in Chinook salmon embryo cells (CHSE-214) is reported. Type I IFN-like activity was produced by the stimulation of Atlantic salmon macrophages with the synthetic dsRNA polyinosinic polycytidylic acid (poly I:C). A correlation appeared to exist between Mx protein expression and protection against infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV) induced by IFN in CHSE-214 cells. Several observations in the present work suggest that, as in mammals, the induction of Mx protein by dsRNA in fish cells primarily occurs via induction of type I IFN. First, type I IFN-like activity but not poly I:C, induced Mx protein expression in CHSE-214 cells. These cells apparently lack the ability to produce IFN in response to poly I:C. Second, the putative IFN induced maximal Mx protein expression 48 h earlier than poly I:C in AS cells. Third, the peak expression of Mx protein in macrophages induced by poly I:C occurred after 48 h whereas peak in IFN-like activity was observed by 24 h after addition of poly I:C. The present work supports the notion of using Mx protein as a molecular marker for the production of putative type I IFN in fish.     

Effects of salmonid fish viruses on Mx gene expression and resistance to single or dual viral infections

We examined the ability of several fish viruses to induce protection against homologous or heterologous viruses in single or double infections, and assessed whether such protection is correlated with innate immunity or expression of the Mx gene. Monolayers of BF2 cells pre-treated with supernatants of brown trout (Salmo trutta L.) macrophage cultures that had been stimulated with either polyinosinic polycytidylic acid (poly I:C) or viruses, such as infectious pancreatic necrosis virus (IPNV), infectious haematopoietic necrosis virus (IHNV) or a mixture of the two, showed varying degrees of protection against viral infections. The virus showing the strongest induction was IPNV, and the antiviral activity against IHNV was also high: around 6 log(10) reduction of virus yield. Consequently, the IPNV-IHNV co-infection yield was also reduced by varying amounts. In vivo, the cumulative mortality observed in the IPNV-IHNV co-infected fish was always less than that in those with a single infection. Stimulation with poly I:C for 7 days significantly reduced cumulative mortality in single-infected fish, but not in the double-infected, in which the IPNV was the only virus isolated from moribund animals. By RT-PCR, Mx was expressed in all the organ samples tested (kidney, liver and spleen) from virus-stimulated fish at 1, 2 and 3 days. By qRT-PCR the extent and timing of Mx expression was shown to differ in the poly I:C and the single or dual viral infections. The highest increase in Mx expression (21.6-fold above basal levels) occurred (after 24 h) in fish infected with the IHNV, and expression remained high until day 7. Mx expression in fish infected with IPNV peaked later, at 2 days post infection, and also remained high until day 7. The dual infection with IPNV-IHNV induced high Mx expression on day 1, which peaked on day 2 and remained high until day 7. These results indicate that activation of the immune system could explain the interference and loss of IHNV in the IPNV-IHNV co-infections.     

Functional replacement of the carboxy-terminal two-thirds of the influenza A virus NS1 protein with short heterologous dimerization domains

The NS1 protein of influenza A/WSN/33 virus is a 230-amino-acid-long protein which functions as an interferon alpha/beta (IFN-alpha/beta) antagonist by preventing the synthesis of IFN during viral infection. In tissue culture, the IFN inhibitory function of the NS1 protein has been mapped to the RNA binding domain, the first 73 amino acids. Nevertheless, influenza viruses expressing carboxy-terminally truncated NS1 proteins are attenuated in mice. Dimerization of the NS1 protein has previously been shown to be essential for its RNA binding activity. We have explored the ability of heterologous dimerization domains to functionally substitute in vivo for the carboxy-terminal domains of the NS1 protein. Recombinant influenza viruses were generated that expressed truncated NS1 proteins of 126 amino acids, fused to 28 or 24 amino acids derived from the dimerization domains of either the Saccharomyces cerevisiae PUT3 or the Drosophila melanogaster Ncd (DmNcd) proteins. These viruses regained virulence and lethality in mice. Moreover, a recombinant influenza virus expressing only the first 73 amino acids of the NS1 protein was able to replicate in mice lacking three IFN-regulated antiviral enzymes, PKR, RNaseL, and Mx, but not in wild-type (Mx-deficient) mice, suggesting that the attenuation was mainly due to an inability to inhibit the IFN system. Remarkably, a virus with an NS1 truncated at amino acid 73 but fused to the dimerization domain of DmNcd replicated and was also highly pathogenic in wild-type mice. These results suggest that the main biological function of the carboxy-terminal region of the NS1 protein of influenza A virus is the enhancement of its IFN antagonist properties by stabilizing the NS1 dimeric structure.     

Interferon-induced antiviral protein MxA interacts with the cellular RNA helicases UAP56 and URH49

Mx proteins are a family of large GTPases that are induced exclusively by interferon-α/β and have a broad antiviral activity against several viruses, including influenza A virus (IAV). Although the antiviral activities of mouse Mx1 and human MxA have been studied extensively, the molecular mechanism of action remains largely unsolved. Because no direct interaction between Mx proteins and IAV proteins or RNA had been demonstrated so far, we addressed the question of whether Mx protein would interact with cellular proteins required for efficient replication of IAV. Immunoprecipitation of MxA revealed its association with two closely related RNA helicases, UAP56 and URH49. UAP56 and its paralog URH49 play an important role in IAV replication and are involved in nuclear export of IAV mRNAs and prevention of dsRNA accumulation in infected cells. In vitro binding assays with purified recombinant proteins revealed that MxA formed a direct complex with the RNA helicases. In addition, recombinant mouse Mx1 was also able to bind to UAP56 or URH49. Furthermore, the complex formation between cytoplasmic MxA and UAP56 or URH49 occurred in the perinuclear region, whereas nuclear Mx1 interacted with UAP56 or URH49 in distinct dots in the nucleus. Taken together, our data reveal that Mx proteins exerting antiviral activity can directly bind to the two cellular DExD/H box RNA helicases UAP56 and URH49. Moreover, the observed subcellular localization of the Mx-RNA helicase complexes coincides with the subcellular localization, where human MxA and mouse Mx1 proteins act antivirally. On the basis of these data, we propose that Mx proteins exert their antiviral activity against IAV by interfering with the function of the RNA helicases UAP56 and URH49.     

Interferon-Induced Antiviral Mx1 GTPase Is Associated with Components of the SUMO-1 System and Promyelocytic Leukemia Protein Nuclear Bodies

Mx proteins are interferon-induced large GTPases, some of which have antiviral activity against a variety of viruses. The murine Mx1 protein accumulates in the nucleus of interferon-treated cells and is active against members of the Orthomyxoviridae family, such as the influenza viruses and Thogoto virus. The mechanism by which Mx1 exerts its antiviral action is still unclear, but an involvement of undefined nuclear factors has been postulated. Using the yeast two-hybrid system, we identified cellular proteins that interact with Mx1 protein. The Mx1 interactors were mainly nuclear proteins. They included Sp100, Daxx, and Bloom's syndrome protein (BLM), all of which are known to localize to specific subnuclear domains called promyelocytic leukemia protein nuclear bodies (PML NBs). In addition, components of the SUMO-1 protein modification system were identified as Mx1-interacting proteins, namely the small ubiquitin-like modifier SUMO-1 and SAE2, which represents subunit 2 of the SUMO-1 activating enzyme. Analysis of the subcellular localization of Mx1 and some of these interacting proteins by confocal microscopy revealed a close spatial association of Mx1 with PML NBs. This suggests a role of PML NBs and SUMO-1 in the antiviral action of Mx1 and may allow us to discover novel functions of this large GTPase.     

Both antiviral activity and intracellular localization of chicken Mx protein depend on a polymorphism at amino acid position 631

The Mx protein is known to inhibit the multiplication of several RNA viruses. In chickens, a polymorphism at amino acid position 631 (631 aa) of Mx protein has been suggested to be involved in the antiviral ability against vesicular stomatitis virus (VSV) and influenza virus, indicating that a Ser-to-Asn substitution at 631 aa is the source of this antiviral ability. However, how the substitution at 631 aa contributes to the antiviral activity remains to be clarified. In this study, we investigated differences in antiviral activity against VSV and intracellular localization between Ser and Asn types at 631 aa of the chicken Mx protein. The results showed that chicken Mx protein with an Asn at 631 aa inhibited VSV multiplication and Mx distribution in a granular-like pattern in the cytoplasm. However, Mx carrying the Ser type did not inhibit viral growth and homogenous spread throughout the cytoplasm. Furthermore, we found that replacing Ser with Asn at 631 aa provided Mx with antiviral activity against VSV, with Mx showing granular-like distribution in the cytoplasm. These results demonstrated that a single amino acid polymorphism at 631 aa of the chicken Mx protein altered both the antiviral activity and intracellular localization.     

A functional GTP-binding motif is necessary for antiviral activity of Mx proteins.

Mx proteins are interferon-induced GTPases that inhibit the multiplication of certain negative-stranded RNA viruses. However, it has been unclear whether GTPase activity is necessary for antiviral function. Here, we have introduced mutations into the tripartite GTP-binding consensus elements of the human MxA and mouse Mx1 proteins. The invariant lysine residue of the first consensus motif, which interacts with the beta- and gamma-phosphates of bound GTP in other GTPases, was deleted or replaced by methionine or alanine. These Mx mutants and appropriate controls were then tested for antiviral activity, GTP-binding capacity, and GTPase activity. We found a direct correlation between the GTP-binding capacities and GTP hydrolysis activities of the purified Mx mutants in vitro and their antiviral activities in transfected 3T3 cells, demonstrating that a functional GTP-binding motif is necessary for virus inhibition. Our results, thus, firmly establish antiviral activity as a novel function of a GTPase, emphasizing the enormous functional diversity of GTPase superfamily members.     

Interferon, Mx, and viral countermeasures

The interferon system provides a powerful and universal intracellular defense mechanism against viruses. Knockout mice defective in IFN signaling quickly succumb to all kinds of viral infections. Likewise, humans with genetic defects in interferon signaling die of viral disease at an early age. Among the known interferon-induced antiviral mechanisms, the Mx pathway is one of the most powerful. Mx proteins belong to the dynamin superfamily of large GTPases and have direct antiviral activity. They inhibit a wide range of viruses by blocking an early stage of the viral replication cycle. Likewise, the protein kinase R (PKR), and the 2–5 OAS/RNaseL system represent major antiviral pathways and have been extensively studied. Viruses, in turn, have evolved multiple strategies to escape the IFN system. They try to go undetected, suppress IFN synthesis, bind and neutralize secreted IFN molecules, block IFN signaling, or inhibit the action of IFN-induced antiviral proteins. Here, we summarize recent findings about the astonishing interplay of viruses with the IFN response pathway.     

Disruption of Type I Interferon Induction by HIV Infection of T Cells

Our main objective of this study was to determine how Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) avoids induction of the antiviral Type I Interferon (IFN) system. To limit viral infection, the innate immune system produces important antiviral cytokines such as the IFN. IFN set up a critical roadblock to virus infection by limiting further replication of a virus. Usually, IFN production is induced by the recognition of viral nucleic acids by innate immune receptors and subsequent downstream signaling. However, the importance of IFN in the defense against viruses has lead most pathogenic viruses to evolve strategies to inhibit host IFN induction or responses allowing for increased pathogenicity and persistence of the virus. While the adaptive immune responses to HIV infection have been extensively studied, less is known about the balance between induction and inhibition of innate immune defenses, including the antiviral IFN response, by HIV infection. Here we show that HIV infection of T cells does not induce significant IFN production even IFN I Interferon production. To explain this paradox, we screened HIV proteins and found that two HIV encoded proteins, Vpu and Nef, strongly antagonize IFN induction, with expression of these proteins leading to loss of expression of the innate immune viral RNA sensing adaptor protein, IPS-1 (IFN-β promoter stimulator-1). We hypothesize that with lower levels of IPS-1 present, infected cells are defective in mounting antiviral responses allowing HIV to replicate without the normal antiviral actions of the host IFN response. Using cell lines as well as primary human derived cells, we show that HIV targeting of IPS-1 is key to limiting IFN induction. These findings describe how HIV infection modulates IFN induction providing insight into the mechanisms by which HIV establishes infection and persistence in a host.     

Antiviral state against influenza virus neutralized by microinjection of antibodies to interferon-induced Mx proteins.

In mouse Mx+ cells, interferon alpha/beta induces the synthesis of the nuclear Mx protein, whose accumulation is correlated with specific inhibition of influenza viral protein synthesis. When Mx+ mouse cells are microinjected with the monoclonal anti-Mx antibody 2C12, interferon alpha/beta still induces Mx protein, but no longer inhibits efficiently the expression of influenza viral proteins as visualized by immunofluorescent labeling. However, interferon inhibition of an unrelated control virus, vesicular stomatitis virus, remains unchanged. Proteins with homology to mouse Mx protein are found in interferon-treated cells of a variety of mammalian species. In rat cells, for instance, rat interferon alpha/beta induces three Mx proteins which all cross-react with antibody 2C12 but differ in mol. wt and intracellular location, and it protects these cells well against influenza viruses. However, when rat cells are microinjected with antibody 2C12, interferon alpha/beta cannot induce an efficient antiviral state against influenza virus infection, whereas protection against vesicular stomatitis virus is not altered. These results show that both mouse and rat cells require functional Mx proteins for efficient protection against influenza virus. They further demonstrate that microinjection of antibodies is a promising way of elucidating the role of particular interferon-induced proteins in the intact cell.     

The Cytoplasmic Location of Chicken Mx Is Not the Determining Factor for Its Lack of Antiviral Activity

Background

Chicken Mx belongs to the Mx family of interferon-induced dynamin-like GTPases, which in some species possess potent antiviral properties. Conflicting data exist for the antiviral capability of chicken Mx. Reports of anti-influenza activity of alleles encoding an Asn631 polymorphism have not been supported by subsequent studies. The normal cytoplasmic localisation of chicken Mx may influence its antiviral capacity. Here we report further studies to determine the antiviral potential of chicken Mx against Newcastle disease virus (NDV), an economically important cytoplasmic RNA virus of chickens, and Thogoto virus, an orthomyxovirus known to be exquisitely sensitive to the cytoplasmic MxA protein from humans. We also report the consequences of re-locating chicken Mx to the nucleus.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Chicken Mx was tested in virus infection assays using NDV. Neither the Asn631 nor Ser631 Mx alleles (when transfected into 293T cells) showed inhibition of virus-directed gene expression when the cells were subsequently infected with NDV. Human MxA however did show significant inhibition of NDV-directed gene expression. Chicken Mx failed to inhibit a Thogoto virus (THOV) minireplicon system in which the cytoplasmic human MxA protein showed potent and specific inhibition. Relocalisation of chicken Mx to the nucleus was achieved by inserting the Simian Virus 40 large T antigen nuclear localisation sequence (SV40 NLS) at the N-terminus of chicken Mx. Nuclear re-localised chicken Mx did not inhibit influenza (A/PR/8/34) gene expression during virus infection in cell culture or influenza polymerase activity in A/PR/8/34 or A/Turkey/50-92/91 minireplicon systems.

Conclusions/Significance

The chicken Mx protein (Asn631) lacks inhibitory effects against THOV and NDV, and is unable to suppress influenza replication when artificially re-localised to the cell nucleus. Thus, the natural cytoplasmic localisation of the chicken Mx protein does not account for its lack of antiviral activity.