A major functional difference between the mouse and human ARF tumor suppressor proteins

Suppression of tumorigenesis is considerably more stringent in the human than in the much shorter lived mouse species, and the reasons for this difference are poorly understood. We investigated functional differences in the control of the ARF (alternative reading frame) protein that acts upstream of p53 and is encoded along with p16(INK4a) at a major tumor suppressor locus in both the human and mouse genomes. The mouse and human ARF proteins are substantially divergent at their carboxyl termini. We have shown that the mouse ARF protein (p19ARF) interacts with Pex19p in the cell cytoplasm leading to its nuclear exclusion and repression of its p53 activation function. The human ARF protein (p14ARF) is substantially smaller than its mouse counterpart and is not subject to this functional inactivation by Pex19p. In an identical cellular background, ribozymes directed against Pex19p enhanced p19ARF- but not p14ARF-activated p53 function. This is the first demonstration of a functional difference between the mouse and human ARF proteins. In view of the major role of ARF in tumor suppression, this distinction may contribute to the different levels of tumor proneness of these species.     

Pex19p, a Farnesylated Protein Essential for Peroxisome Biogenesis

We report the identification and molecular characterization of Pex19p, an oleic acid-inducible, farnesylated protein of 39.7 kDa that is essential for peroxisome biogenesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Cells lacking Pex19p are characterized by the absence of morphologically detectable peroxisomes and mislocalization of peroxisomal matrix proteins to the cytosol. The human HK33 gene product was identified as the putative human ortholog of Pex19p. Evidence is provided that farnesylation of Pex19p takes place at the cysteine of the C-terminal CKQQ amino acid sequence. Farnesylation of Pex19p was shown to be essential for the proper function of the protein in peroxisome biogenesis. Pex19p was shown to interact with Pex3p in vivo, and this interaction required farnesylation of Pex19p.     

p19ARF-induced p53-independent apoptosis largely occurs through BAX

Combined disruption of the ARF gene and the p53 gene causes mouse predisposition to tumors of a wider variety and at a higher frequency than disruption of the p53 gene, indicating that the ARF gene has p53-independent anti-tumor function in addition to p53-dependent function. Coincidentally with this notion, ectopic expression of the p19(ARF) induces apoptosis for wild-type mouse embryo fibroblasts which have been immortalized by introduction of the SV40 virus genome (SV40-MEFs). The protein expression levels of p53, p21(Cip1), and Bax were not upregulated by ectopic expression of p19(ARF) in SV40-MEFs, indicating that expression of p19(ARF) induced apoptosis through p53-independent pathways in this system. Ectopic expression of p19(ARF) induced prominent apoptosis even in SV40-Bak-/-MEFs. In contrast, expression of p19(ARF) induced only a very low grade of apoptosis in Bax-/- or Bax-/-/Bak-/-SV40-MEFs. Remarkable attenuation of p19(ARF)-induced apoptosis by disruption of the Bax gene thus leads to the conclusion that Bax plays a major role in p53-independent apoptosis induced by p19(ARF).     

CARF is a novel protein that cooperates with mouse p19ARF (human p14ARF) in activating p53

The INK4a locus on chromosome 9p21 encodes two structurally distinct tumor suppressor proteins, p16(INK4a) and the alternative reading frame protein, ARF (p19(ARF) in mouse and p14(ARF) in human). Each of these proteins has a role in senescence of primary cells and activates pathways for cell cycle control and tumor suppression. The current prevailing model proposes that p19(ARF) activates p53 function by antagonizing its degradation by MDM2. It was, however, recently shown that stabilization of p53 by p14(ARF) occurs independent of the relocalization of MDM2 to the nucleolus. We have identified a novel collaborator of ARF, CARF. It co-localizes and interacts with ARF in the nucleolus. We demonstrate that CARF is co-regulated with ARF, cooperates with it in activating p53, and thus acts as a novel component of the ARF-p53-p21 pathway.     

p53-independent apoptosis is induced by the p19ARF tumor suppressor

p19(ARF) is a potent tumor suppressor. By inactivating Mdm2, p19(ARF) upregulates p53 activities to induce cell cycle arrest and sensitize cells to apoptosis in the presence of collateral signals. It has also been demonstrated that cell cycle arrest is induced by overexpressed p19(ARF) in p53-deficient mouse embryonic fibroblasts, only in the absence of the Mdm2 gene. Here, we show that apoptosis can be induced without additional apoptosis signals by expression of p19(ARF) using an adenovirus-mediated expression system in p53-intact cell lines as well as p53-deficient cell lines. Also, in primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) lacking p53/ARF, p53-independent apoptosis is induced irrespective of Mdm2 status by expression of p19(ARF). In agreement, p19(ARF)-mediated apoptosis in U2OS cells, but not in Saos2 cells, was attenuated by coexpression of Mdm2. We thus conclude that there is a p53-independent pathway for p19(ARF)-induced apoptosis that is insensitive to inhibition by Mdm2.     

Mdm2 regulates p53 independently of p19(ARF) in homeostatic tissues

Tumor suppressor proteins must be exquisitely regulated since they can induce cell death while preventing cancer. For example, the p19(ARF) tumor suppressor (p14(ARF) in humans) appears to stimulate the apoptotic function of the p53 tumor suppressor to prevent lymphomagenesis and carcinogenesis induced by oncogene overexpression. Here we present a genetic approach to defining the role of p19(ARF) in regulating the apoptotic function of p53 in highly proliferating, homeostatic tissues. In contrast to our expectation, p19(ARF) did not activate the apoptotic function of p53 in lymphocytes or epithelial cells. These results demonstrate that the mechanisms that control p53 function during homeostasis differ from those that are critical for tumor suppression. Moreover, the Mdm2/p53/p19(ARF) pathway appears to exist only under very restricted conditions.     

The ARF-p53 senescence pathway in mouse and human cells

Mouse and human cells have most frequently been used for studies that have led to the elucidation of various molecular pathways involved in senescence. The ARF-p53 pathway has been assigned as one of the major protagonists in these phenomena. ARF is an alternative reading frame protein encoded along with p16INK4A by the INK4a locus on human chromosome 9p21 and the corresponding locus on mouse chromosome 4. Whereas the mouse ARF (p19ARF) consists of 169 amino acids, the human ARF (p14ARF) consists of 132 amino acids, truncated at the C-terminus. Molecular studies on the regulation of ARF activity by its binding partners have revealed that mouse ARF protein, but not human ARF protein, interacts with a cytoplasmic protein, Pex19p. This interaction of mouse ARF with Pex19p results in its milder p53 activation function in mouse cells as compared to human cells and thus accounts, at least in part, for the weaker tumor surveillance and frequent immortalization of mouse cells.     

Multiple domains of the mouse p19ARF tumor suppressor are involved in p53-independent apoptosis

The ARF (p19ARF for the mouse ARF consisting of 169 amino acids and p14ARF for the human ARF consisting of 132 amino acids) genes upregulate p53 activities to induce cell cycle arrest and sensitize cells to apoptosis by inhibiting Mdm2 activity. p53-independent apoptosis also is induced by ectopic expression of p19ARF. We constructed various deletion mutants of p19ARF with a cre/loxP-regulated adenoviral vector to determine the regions of p19ARF which are responsible for p53-independent apoptosis. Ectopic expression of the C-terminal region (named C40) of p19ARF whose primary sequence is unique to the rodent ARF induced prominent apoptosis in p53-deficient mouse embryo fibroblasts. Relatively low-grade but significant apoptosis also was induced in p53-deficient mouse embryo fibroblasts by ectopic expression of p19ARF1-129, a p19ARF deletion mutant deficient in the C40 region. In contrast, ectopic expression of the wild-type p14ARF did not induce significant apoptosis in human cells. Taken together, we concluded that p53-independent apoptosis was mediated through multiple regions of the mouse ARF including C40, and the ability of the ARF gene to mediate p53-independent apoptosis has been not well conserved during mammalian evolution.     

Potential role for Pex19p in assembly of PTS-receptor docking complexes

Human Pex19p binds a broad spectrum of peroxisomal membrane proteins (PMPs). It has been proposed that this peroxin may: (i) act as a cycling PMP receptor protein, (ii) facilitate the insertion of newly synthesized PMPs into the peroxisomal membrane, or (iii) function as a chaperone to associate and/or dissociate complexes comprising integral PMPs already in the peroxisomal membrane. We previously demonstrated that human Pex19p binds peroxisomal integral membrane proteins at regions distinct from their sorting sequences. Here we demonstrate that a mutant of Pex13p that fails to bind to Pex19p nevertheless targets to and integrates into the peroxisomal membrane. In addition, through in vitro biochemical analysis, we show that Pex19p competes with Pex5p and Pex13p for binding to Pex14p, supporting a role for this peroxin in regulating assembly/disassembly of membrane-associated protein complexes. To further examine the molecular mechanism underlying this competition, six evolutionarily conserved amino acids in the Pex5p/Pex13p/Pex19p binding domain of Pex14p were subjected to site-directed mutagenesis and the corresponding mutants functionally analyzed. Our results indicate that the physically overlapping binding sites of Pex14p for Pex5p, Pex13p, and Pex19p are functionally distinct, suggesting that competition occurs through induction of structural changes, rather than through direct competition. Importantly, we also found that amino acid substitutions resulting in a strongly reduced binding affinity for Pex13p affect the peroxisomal localization of Pex14p.     

Pex19p contributes to peroxisome inheritance in the association of peroxisomes to Myo2p

During budding of yeast cells peroxisomes are distributed over mother cell and bud, a process that involves the myosin motor protein Myo2p and the peroxisomal membrane protein Inp2p. Here, we show that Pex19p, a peroxin implicated in targeting and complex formation of peroxisomal membrane proteins, also plays a role in peroxisome partitioning. Binding studies revealed that Pex19p interacts with the cargo-binding domain of Myo2p. We identified mutations in Myo2p that specifically reduced binding to Pex19p, but not to Inp2p. The interaction between Myo2p and Pex19p was also reduced by a mutation that blocked Pex19p farnesylation. Microscopy revealed that the Pex19p-Myo2p interaction is important for peroxisome inheritance, because mutations that affect this interaction hamper peroxisome inheritance in vivo. Together these data suggest that both Inp2p and Pex19p are required for proper association of peroxisomes to Myo2p.     

Pex19p Interacts with Pex3p and Pex10p and Is Essential for Peroxisome Biogenesis in Pichia pastoris

We report the cloning and characterization of Pichia pastoris PEX19 by complementation of a peroxisome-deficient mutant strain. Import of peroxisomal targeting signal 1- and 2-containing peroxisomal matrix proteins is defective in pex19 mutants. PEX19 encodes a hydrophilic 299-amino acid protein with sequence similarity to Saccharomyces cerevisiae Pex19p and human and Chinese hamster PxF, all farnesylated proteins, as well as hypothetical proteins from Caenorhabditis elegans and Schizosaccharomyces pombe. The farnesylation consensus is conserved in PpPex19p but dispensable for function and appears unmodified under the conditions tested. Pex19p localizes predominantly to the cytosolic fraction. Biochemical and two-hybrid analyses confirmed that Pex19p interacts with Pex3p, as seen in S. cerevisiae, but unexpectedly also with Pex10p. Two-hybrid analysis demonstrated that the amino-terminal 42 amino acids of Pex19p interact with the carboxyl-terminal 335 amino acids of Pex3p. In addition, the extreme carboxyl terminus of Pex19p (67 amino acids) is required for interaction with the amino-terminal 380 amino acids of Pex10p. Biochemical and immunofluorescence microscopy analyses of pex19Delta cells identified the membrane protein Pex3p in peroxisome remnants that were not previously observed in S. cerevisiae. These small vesicular and tubular (early) remnants are morphologically distinct from other Pppex mutant (late) remnants, suggesting that Pex19p functions at an early stage of peroxisome biogenesis.     

Pex19p-dependent targeting of Pex17p, a peripheral component of the peroxisomal protein import machinery

Pex19p is required for the topogenesis of peroxisomal membrane proteins (PMPs). Here we have demonstrated that Pex19p is also required for the peroxisomal targeting and stability of Pex17p, a peripheral component of the docking complex of the peroxisomal protein import machinery. We have demonstrated that Pex17p is associated with the peroxisomal Pex13p-Pex14p complex as well as with Pex19p. We have identified the corresponding binding sites for Pex14p and Pex19p and demonstrated that a specific loss of the Pex19p interaction resulted in mistargeting of Pex17p. We have shown that a construct consisting only of the Pex19p- and Pex14p-binding sites of Pex17p is sufficient to direct an otherwise cytosolic reporter protein to the peroxisomal membrane in a Pex19p-dependent manner. Our data show that the function of Pex19p as chaperone or import receptor is not restricted to integral membrane proteins but may also include peripheral PMPs. As a consequence of our data, the previous definition of a targeting signal for PMPs (mPTS) as a Pex19p-binding motif in conjunction with a transmembrane segment should be extended to regions comprising a Pex19p-binding motif and a peroxisomal anchor sequence.     

p16INK4A and p19ARF act in overlapping pathways in cellular immortalization

The INK4A locus encodes two independent but overlapping genes, p16INK4A and p19ARF, and is frequently inactivated in human cancers. The unusual structure of this locus has lead to ambiguity regarding the biological role of each gene. Here we express, in primary mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs), antisense RNA constructs directed specifically towards either p16INK4A or p19 ARF. Such constructs induce extended lifespan in primary MEFs; this lifespan extension is reversed upon subsequent elimination of the p16INK4A or p19ARF antisense constructs. In immortal derivatives of cell lines expressing antisense p16INK4A or p19ARF RNA, growth arrest induced by recovery of p16INK4A expression is bypassed by compromising the function of the retinoblastoma protein (Rb), whereas growth arrest induced by re-expression of p19ARF is overcome only by simultaneous inactivation of both the Rb and the p53 pathways. Thus, the physically overlapping p16INK4A and p19ARF genes act in partly overlapping pathways.     

The import competence of a peroxisomal membrane protein is determined by Pex19p before the docking step

Biogenesis of the mammalian peroxisomal membrane requires the action of Pex3p and Pex16p, two proteins present in the organelle membrane, and Pex19p, a protein that displays a dual subcellular distribution (peroxisomal and cytosolic). Pex19p interacts with most peroxisomal intrinsic membrane proteins, but whether this property reflects its role as an import receptor for this class of proteins or a chaperone-like function in the assembly/disassembly of peroxisomal membrane proteins has been the subject of much controversy. Here, we describe an in vitro system particularly suited to address this issue. It is shown that insertion of a reporter protein into the peroxisomal membrane is a Pex3p-dependent process that does not require ATP/GTP hydrolysis. The system can be programmed with recombinant versions of Pex19p, allowing us to demonstrate that Pex19p-cargo protein complexes formed in the absence of peroxisomes are the substrates for the peroxisomal docking/insertion machinery. Data suggesting that cargo-loaded Pex19p displays a much higher affinity for Pex3p than Pex19p alone are also provided. These results suggest that soluble Pex19p participates in the targeting of newly synthesized peroxisomal membrane proteins to the organelle membrane and support the existence of a cargo-induced peroxisomal targeting mechanism for Pex19p.     

Hansenula polymorpha Pex19p is essential for the formation of functional peroxisomal membranes

We have cloned and characterized the Hansenula polymorpha PEX19 gene. In cells of a pex19 disruption strain (Hppex19), induced on methanol, peroxisome structures were not detectable; peroxisomal matrix proteins accumulated in the cytosol, whereas peroxisomal membrane proteins (PMPs) were mislocalized to the cytosol (Pex3p) and mitochondria (Pex14p) or strongly reduced to undetectable levels (Pex10p). The defect in peroxisome formation in Hppex19 cells was largely suppressed upon overproduction of HpPex3p or a fusion protein that consisted of the first 50 N-terminal amino acids of Pex3p and GFP. In these cells PMPs were again correctly sorted to peroxisomal structures, which also harbored peroxisomal matrix proteins. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae pex19 cells overproduction of ScPex3p led to the formation of numerous vesicles that contained PMPs but lacked the major matrix protein thiolase. Taken together, our data are consistent with a function of Pex19p in membrane protein assembly and function.     

The peroxin Pex19p interacts with multiple, integral membrane proteins at the peroxisomal membrane

Pex19p is a protein required for the early stages of peroxisome biogenesis, but its precise function and site of action are unknown. We tested the interaction between Pex19p and all known Pichia pastoris Pex proteins by the yeast two-hybrid assay. Pex19p interacted with six of seven known integral peroxisomal membrane proteins (iPMPs), and these interactions were confirmed by coimmunoprecipitation. The interactions were not reduced upon inhibition of new protein synthesis, suggesting that they occur with preexisting, and not newly synthesized, pools of iPMPs. By mapping the domains in six iPMPs that interact with Pex19p and the iPMP sequences responsible for targeting to the peroxisome membrane (mPTSs), we found the majority of these sites do not overlap. Coimmunoprecipitation of Pex19p from fractions that contain peroxisomes or cytosol revealed that the interactions between predominantly cytosolic Pex19p and the iPMPs occur in the organelle pellet that contains peroxisomes. These data, taken together, suggest that Pex19p may have a chaperone-like role at the peroxisome membrane and that it is not the receptor for targeting of iPMPs to the peroxisome.     

Nucleolar p19ARF unlike mitochondrial smARF is incapable of inducing p53-independent autophagy

ARF mRNA encodes two distinct proteins, the nucleolar p19ARF and ashorter mitochondrial isoform, named smARF. Inappropriate proliferative signals generated by proto-oncogenes, such as c-Myc and E2F1, can elevate both p19ARF and smARF proteins. The two ARF isoforms differ not only in their localization but also in their functions. Nucleolar p19ARF inhibits cell growth mainly by activating p53 or by inhibiting ribosomal biogenesis. In contrast, mitochondrial smARF caninduce dissipation of the mitochondrial membrane potential and autophagy in a p53 independent manner. Recently, it was proposed by Abida et. al., that similar to smARF, the nucleolar p19ARF can also induce p53 independent autophagy, but in contrast to smARF it does so from within the nucleolus. Our current work shown here indicates however, that if the ectopic expression of p19ARF is restricted to thenucleolus it cannot induce autophagic vesicle formation. Only upon extreme overexpression, when p19ARF is localized to extra nuclear compartments, it can trigger p53-independent autophagic vesicle formation. Thus, our experiments indicate that the nucleolar p19ARF is incapable to induce autophagy from within the nucleolus.