Circadian rhythms in plants: Strategies for analysis

Molecular mechanism of the circadian clock which regulates the circadian rhythms has been believed to be common in different organisms. However, recent topic about multiple oscillators in a cell is thought to suggest other possibility. We may need to reconsider effectiveness of strategies for understanding molecular mechanism of the circadian clock.     

Circadian rhythms in biologically closed electrical circuits of plants

The circadian clock regulates a wide range of electrophysiological and developmental processes in plants. Here, we discuss the direct influence of a circadian clock on biologically closed electrochemical circuits in vivo. The biologically closed electrochemical circuits in the leaves of C. miniata (Kaffir lily), Aloe vera and Mimosa pudica, which regulate their physiology, were analyzed using the charge stimulation method. Plants are able to memorize daytime and nighttime. Even at continuous light or darkness, plants recognize nighttime or daytime and change the input resistance. The circadian clock can be maintained endogenously and has electrochemical oscillators, which can activate ion channels in biologically closed electrochemical circuits. The activation of voltage gated channels depends on the applied voltage, electrical charge, and the speed of transmission of electrical energy from the electrostimulator to plants.     

Circadian rhythms

The neurobiological substratum of circadian rhythmicity encompasses three levels of integration: firstly, generation of time signals by circadian pacemakers; secondly, entrainment of pacemakers by environmental influences; thirdly, coupling of circadian pacemakers among themselves and with target systems responsible for the expression of overt rhythms. From recent contributions, the notion that circadian organization results from the interaction of independent oscillators and pathways has been strengthened. In addition, recent evidence supports the existence of circadian rhythmicity in single isolated neurons. New information was produced on the gene control of circadian rhythm generation in Drosophila, as well as interesting advances in the understanding of neuronal mechanisms involved in the generation, entrainment and coupling of circadian rhythms in various species.     

Circadian rhythms: perturbing a food-entrained clock

When food is scarce, a food-entrainable circadian clock coordinates mammalian activity rhythms with a predictable daily mealtime. Neural and molecular substrates of this circadian function have long eluded localization, but new studies suggest a critical role for a familiar circadian clock gene.     

Circadian rhythms in cockroaches

Summary The driving oscillator, which mediates circadian locomotor rhythms in cockroaches, appears to reside in the protocerebrum of the brain. The evidence indicates that the optic lobes are crucial elements in this circadian system, and that control of rhythmicity is mediated through electrical, rather than hormonal, channels. Lesions were placed at various sites within the optic lobes in order to localize the areas controlling rhythmicity. It appears that the two innermost synaptic areas (the lobula and the medulla) constitute the crucial optic lobe elements. The outer synaptic area of the optic lobe (the lamina) is not necessary for the expression of rhythmicity, but does function as a coupling through which light cycles, transduced by the compound eyes, entrain the circadian clock.I would like to thank both Dr. Sue Binkley for her helpful comments in the preparation of this report, and Mr. Eli Levine for his assistance in photography. Support for this research was provided by a grant from the National Science Foundation (NS GB-30497).     

Circadian physiological rhythms

Mammals show numerous circadian rhythms, some exogenous but nonetheless useful, some endogenous. Even in the absence of exogenous synchronizers, different physiological functions usually preserve their normal temporal relations, suggesting that a single clock controls most or all of the rhythmic manifestations. The role of adrenal corticosteroids and of temperature as means whereby the clock influences other functions is considered.     

Circadian complexes: Circadian rhythms under common gene control

Summary Circadian rhythms for food and water consumption were measured in five inbred strains of mice under a photoperiod of 16 h light and 8 h dark (16:8 LD), and under constant light (LL).Significant strain differences were observed which indicate that a common gene difference, or set of differences inMus musculus influences both the phase angle () associating the rhythms with the light-dark cycle, and the periods (_LL) of circadian rhythms for food and water consumption. The biological clock mechanism influenced by this genetic variance is common to both food and water circadian rhythms, and differs among the five inbred strains. A positive genetic correlation was observed between the phase angle () and the period (_LL) of each rhythm. This observation can be understood in terms of a functional relationship between phase and period proposed by Pittendrigh and Daan (1976b) for the entrainment of a circadian oscillator by a light-dark cycle in nocturnal rodents.These results suggest that circadian rhythms for food and water consumption in mice are regulated by a common physiological mechanism, and would respond to natural selection as a single circadian complex under common gene control.     

Circadian rhythms and insomnia

Sleep and Biological Rhythms - Circadian rhythms strongly influence when we are sleepy and when we are alert. If the timing of these rhythms is later than normal, it can contribute to sleep onset...     

Circadian rhythms: biological clocks work in phospho-time

The 24 hour molecular oscillator requires precisely calibrated degradation of core clock proteins, like PERIOD. New studies shed light on a sequential series of PERIOD phosphorylation events that first inhibits, then accelerates PERIOD degradation.     

Circadian rhythms of performance: new trends

This brief review is concerned with how human performance efficiency changes as a function of time of day. It presents an overview of some of the research paradigms and conceptual models that have been used to investigate circadian performance rhythms. The influence of homeostatic and circadian processes on performance regulation is discussed. The review also briefly presents recent mathematical models of alertness that have been used to predict cognitive performance. Related topics such as interindividual differences and the postlunch dip are presented. (Chronobiology International, 17(6), 719-732, 2000)