Antibody-independent antiviral function of memory CD4+ T cells in vivo requires regulatory signals from CD8+ effector T cells

Previous studies have shown that vaccine-primed CD4(+) T cells can mediate accelerated clearance of respiratory virus infection. However, the relative contributions of Ab and CD8(+) T cells, and the mechanism of viral clearance, are poorly understood. Here we show that control of a Sendai virus infection by primed CD4(+) T cells is mediated through the production of IFN-gamma and does not depend on Ab. This effect is critically dependent on CD8(+) cells for the expansion of CD4(+) T cells in the lymph nodes and the recruitment of memory CD4(+) T cells to the lungs. Passive transfer of a CD8(+) T cell supernatant into CD8(+) T cell-depleted, hemagglutinin-neuraminidase (HN)(421-436)-immune muMT mice substantially restored the virus-specific memory CD4(+) response and enhanced viral control in the lung. Together, the data demonstrate for the first time that in vivo primed CD4(+) T cells have the capacity to control a respiratory virus infection in the lung by an Ab-independent mechanism, provided that CD8(+) T cell "help" in the form of soluble factor(s) is available during the virus infection. These studies highlight the importance of synergistic interactions between CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell subsets in the generation of optimal antiviral immunity.     

Bystander central memory but not effector memory CD8+ T cells suppress allograft rejection

Memory T cells respond faster and more vigorously than their naive counterparts and are critical for adaptive immunity. However, it is unknown whether and how memory T cells react in the face of irrelevant Ags. It is generally accepted that bystander memory T cells are neutral in immune responsiveness. In this study, we present the first evidence that bystander central memory (TCM), but not effector memory (TEM), CD8+ T cells suppress allograft rejection as well as T cell proliferation in the draining lymph nodes (DLN) of recipient mice. Both bystander TCM and naive T cells, but fewer TEM cells, migrated to DLN, whereas TCM cells exhibited faster turnover than their naive counterparts, suggesting that bystander TCM cells have an advantage over their naive counterparts in suppression. However, bystander TEM cells migrated to inflammatory graft sites, but not DLN, and yet failed to exert their suppression. These findings indicate that bystander memory T cells need to migrate to lymph nodes to exert their suppression by inhibiting responder T cell activation or homeostatic proliferation. Moreover, the suppression mediated by bystander TCM cells was largely dependent on IL-15, as IL-15 was required for their homeostatic proliferation and TCM-mediated suppression of allograft rejection. This suppression also required the presence of TGFbeta1, as TCM cells expressed TGFbeta1 while neutralizing TGFbeta1 abolished their suppression. Thus, bystander TCM, but not TEM, CD8+ T cells are potent suppressors rather than bystanders. This new finding will have an impact on cellular immunology and may have clinic implications for tolerance induction.     

A pool of central memory-like CD4 T cells contains effector memory precursors

The L51S mutation in the D10.G4.1 TCR alpha-chain reduces the affinity of the TCR to its ligand by affecting the interactions among the TCR, the beta-chain of I-A(k), and the bound peptide. We show that this mutation drives the generation of a pool of memory CD44(high)CD62L(neg)CD45RB(neg) CD4 TCR transgenic T cells. Their activation threshold is low, such that they proliferate in response to lower concentrations of agonist peptides than naive L51S CD4 T cells. Unlike effector memory CD4 T cells, however, they lack immediate effector function in response to TCR stimulation. These cells express IL-2R alpha only after culture with specific peptide. Although they can be recovered from lymph nodes, the majority lack the expression of the lymph node homing receptor CCR7. When these cells receive a second TCR stimulation in vitro, they differentiate into potent Th2-like effector cells, producing high levels of IL-4 at doses of agonist peptide too low to stimulate cytokine release from similarly differentiated naive L51S CD4 T cells. Having these properties, the L51S TCR transgenic memory CD4 T cells cannot be classified as either strict central memory or effector memory, but, rather, as a pool of memory T cells containing effector memory precursors.     

Proliferative expansion and acquisition of effector activity by memory CD4+ T cells in the lungs following pulmonary virus infection

The memory CD4+ T cell response to the respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) attachment (G) protein in the lungs of primed BALB/c mice undergoing challenge pulmonary RSV infection is dominated by effector T cells expressing a single Vbeta-chain, Vbeta14. We have used Vbeta14 expression to examine the kinetics of the activation, accumulation, and acquisition of the effector activity of memory CD4+ T cells responding to pulmonary infection. This analysis revealed that proliferative expansion and effector CD4+ T cell differentiation preferentially occur in the respiratory tract following rapid activation within and egress from the lymph nodes draining the respiratory tract. These findings suggest that, in response to natural infection at a peripheral mucosal site such as the lungs, memory CD4+ T cell expansion and differentiation into activated effector T cells may occur predominantly in the peripheral site of infection rather than exclusively in the lymph nodes draining the site of infection.     

CD40L co-stimulation from CD8+ to CD4+ effector memory T cells supports CD4+ expansion

Effector memory T cells (T(EM)) have an important role in immunity against infection. However, little is known about the factors regulating T(EM) maintenance and proliferation. In this study, we investigated the role of direct interactions between CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells (TC) for human T(EM) expansion. Proliferation of separated or mixed CD4(+) and CD8(+)T(EM) populations was analyzed after polyclonal stimulation in vitro. Compared to each isolated subset mixed T(EM) populations showed increased proliferation and expansion of both CD4(+) and CD8(+)T(EM) subpopulations. Combined activation of CD4(+) and CD8(+) memory T cells (Tmem) induced an increased expression of CD40L and CD40 on both populations. Subsequently, CD40/CD40L caused a bi-directional stimulation of CD40(+)CD4(+)T(EM) by CD40L(+)CD8(+)T(EM) and of CD40(+)CD8(+)T(EM) by CD40L(+)CD4(+)T(EM). Blocking of CD40L on activated CD8(+)T(EM) selectively inhibited proliferation of CD4(+)T(EM), while blocking of CD40L on CD4(+)T(EM) abrogated proliferation of CD8(+)T(EM). Taken together, we demonstrate for the first time that the expression of CD40L is exploited on the one hand by CD8(+)T(EM) to increase the proliferation of activated CD4(+)T(EM) and on the other hand by CD4(+)T(EM) to support the expansion of activated CD8(+)T(EM). Thus, efficient T(EM) expansion requires bi-directional interactions between CD4(+) and CD8(+)T(EM) cells.     

Differential requirements for OX40 signals on generation of effector and central memory CD4+ T cells

Memory T cells can be divided into effector memory (T(EM)) and central memory (T(CM)) subsets based on their effector function and homing characteristics. Although previous studies have demonstrated that TCR and cytokine signals mediate the generation of the two memory subsets of CD8(+) T cells, the mechanisms for generation of the CD4(+) T(EM) and T(CM) cell subsets are unknown. We found that OX40-deficient mice showed a marked reduction in the number of CD4(+) T(EM) cells, whereas the number of CD4(+) T(CM) cells was normal. Adoptive transfer experiments using Ag-specific CD4(+) T cells revealed that OX40 signals during the priming phase were indispensable for the optimal generation of the CD4(+) T(EM), but not the CD4(+) T(CM) population. In a different transfer experiment with in vitro established CD4(+)CD44(high)CD62L(low) (T(EM) precursor) and CD4(+)CD44(high)CD62L(high) (T(CM) precursor) subpopulations, OX40-KO T(EM) precursor cells could not survive in the recipient mice, whereas wild-type T(EM) precursor cells differentiated into both T(EM) and T(CM) cells. In contrast, T(CM) precursor cells mainly produced T(CM) cells regardless of OX40 signals, implying the dispensability of OX40 for generation of T(CM) cells. Nevertheless, survival of OX40-KO T(EM) cells was partially rescued in lymphopenic mice. During in vitro recall responses, the OX40-KO T(EM) cells that were generated in lymphopenic recipient mice showed impaired cytokine production, suggesting an essential role for OX40 not only on generation but also on effector function of CD4(+) T(EM) cells. Collectively, the present results indicate differential requirements for OX40 signals on generation of CD4(+) T(EM) and T(CM) cells.     

Epitope cross-reactivity frequently differs between central and effector memory HIV-specific CD8+ T cells

HIV diversity may limit the breadth of vaccine coverage due to epitope sequence differences between strains. Although amino acid substitutions within CD8(+) T cell HIV epitopes can result in complete or partial abrogation of responses, this has primarily been demonstrated in effector CD8(+) T cells. In an HIV-infected Kenyan cohort, we demonstrate that the cross-reactivity of HIV epitope variants differs dramatically between overnight IFN-gamma and longer-term proliferation assays. For most epitopes, particular variants (not the index peptide) were preferred in proliferation in the absence of corresponding overnight IFN-gamma responses and in the absence of the variant in the HIV quasispecies. Most proliferating CD8(+) T cells were polyfunctional via cytokine analyses. A trend to positive correlation was observed between proliferation (but not IFN-gamma) and CD4 counts. We present findings relevant to the assessment of HIV vaccine candidates and toward a better understanding of how viral diversity is tolerated by central and effector memory CD8(+) T cells.     

Dynamic differentiation of activated human peripheral blood CD8+ and CD4+ effector memory T cells

Two functionally different memory T cell subsets were originally defined based on their different CCR7 expression profile, but the lineage relationship between these subsets referred to as central memory T cells (T(CM)) and effector memory T cells (T(EM)), is not resolved. A prevalent model proposes a linear progressive differentiation from T(CM) to T(EM). Our results demonstrate that on activation, human CCR7-CD62L- peripheral blood CD8+ and CD4+ T(EM) cells exhibit a dynamic differentiation, involving transient as well as stable changes to T(CM) phenotype and properties. Whereas the larger fraction of T(EM) cells increases expression of effector molecules, such as perforin or IFN-gamma, a smaller fraction first acquires CCR7 expression. We demonstrate that this acquisition of lymph node homing potential is associated with strong proliferation similar to that of activated T(CM) cells. After proliferation, most of these cells lose CCR7 expression again and acquire effector functions (e.g., perforin production). A small proportion (approximately 6%), however, maintain phenotypic and functional T(CM) properties over a long time interval. These results suggest that T(EM) cells provide immediate effector function by a fraction of cells as well as self-renewal by others through up-regulation of CCR7 followed by either secondary peripheral effector function or long term maintenance of T(CM)-like properties.     

Suppressor effector function of CD4+CD25+ immunoregulatory T cells is antigen nonspecific

CD4+CD25+ T cells represent a unique population of "professional" suppressor T cells that prevent induction of organ-specific autoimmune disease. In vitro, CD4+CD25+ cells were anergic to simulation via the TCR and when cultured with CD4+CD25- cells, markedly suppressed polyclonal T cell proliferation by specifically inhibiting the production of IL-2. Suppression was cytokine independent, cell contact dependent, and required activation of the suppressors via their TCR. Further characterization of the CD4+CD25+ population demonstrated that they do not contain memory or activated T cells and that they act through an APC-independent mechanism. CD4+CD25+ T cells isolated from TCR transgenic (Tg) mice inhibited responses of CD4+CD25- Tg T cells to the same Ag, but also inhibited the Ag-specific responses of Tg cells specific for a distinct Ag. Suppression required that both peptide/MHC complexes be present in the same culture, but the Ags could be presented by two distinct populations of APC. When CD4+CD25+ T cells were cultured with anti-CD3 and IL-2, they expanded, remained anergic, and in the absence of restimulation via their TCR, suppressed Ag-specific responses of CD4+CD25- T cells from multiple TCR transgenics. Collectively, these data demonstrate that CD4+CD25+ T cells require activation via their TCR to become suppressive, but once activated, their suppressor effector function is completely nonspecific. The cell surface molecules involved in this T-T interaction remain to be characterized.     

Heterogeneity of human effector CD4+ T cells

For many years the heterogeneity of CD4⁺ T-helper (Th) cells has been limited to Th1 and Th2 cells, which have been considered not only to be responsible for different types of protective responses, but also for the pathogenesis of many disorders. Th1 cells are indeed protective against intracellular microbes and they are thought to play a pathogenic role in organ-specific autoimmune and other chronic inflammatory disorders. Th2 cells provide protection against helminths, but are also responsible for the pathogenesis of allergic diseases. The identification and cloning of new cytokines has allowed one to enlarge the series of functional subsets of CD4⁺ Th effector cells. In particular, CD4⁺ Th cells producing IL-17 and IL-22, named Th17, have been initially implicated in the pathogenesis of many chronic inflammatory disorders instead of Th1 cells. However, the more recent studies in both humans and mice suggest that Th17 cells exhibit a high plasticity toward Th1 cells and that both Th17 and Th1 cells may be pathogenic. More recently, another two subsets of effector CD4⁺ Th cells, named Th9 and Th22 cells, have been described, even if their pathophysiological meaning is still unclear. Despite the heterogeneity of CD4⁺ effector Th cells being higher than previously thought and some of their subsets exhibiting high plasticity, the Th1/Th2 paradigm still maintains a strong validity.     

Generation of antifungal effector CD8+ T cells in the absence of CD4+ T cells during Cryptococcus neoformans infection

Immunity to the opportunistic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans is dependent on cell-mediated immunity. Individuals with defects in cellular immunity, CD4(+) T cells in particular, are susceptible to infection with this pathogen. In host defense against a number of pathogens, CD8(+) T cell responses are dependent upon CD4(+) T cell help. The goal of these studies was to determine whether CD4(+) T cells are required for the generation of antifungal CD8(+) T cell effectors during pulmonary C. neoformans infection. Using a murine intratracheal infection model, our results demonstrated that CD4(+) T cells were not required for the expansion and trafficking of CD8(+) T cells to the site of infection. CD4(+) T cells were also not required for the generation of IFN-gamma-producing CD8(+) T cell effectors in the lungs. In CD4(-) mice, depletion of CD8(+) T cells resulted in increased intracellular infection of pulmonary macrophages by C. neoformans, increasing the pulmonary burden of the infection. Neutralization of IFN-gamma in CD4(-)CD8(+) mice similarly increased macrophage infection by C. neoformans, thereby blocking the protection provided by CD8(+) T cells. Altogether, these data support the hypothesis that effector CD8(+) T cell function is independent of CD4(+) T cells and that IFN-gamma production from CD8(+) T cells plays a role in controlling C. neoformans by limiting survival of C. neoformans within macrophages.     

CD8+ T effector memory cells protect against liver-stage malaria

Identification of correlates of protection for infectious diseases including malaria is a major challenge and has become one of the main obstacles in developing effective vaccines. We investigated protection against liver-stage malaria conferred by vaccination with adenoviral (Ad) and modified vaccinia Ankara (MVA) vectors expressing pre-erythrocytic malaria Ags. By classifying CD8(+) T cells into effector, effector memory (T(EM)), and central memory subsets using CD62L and CD127 markers, we found striking differences in T cell memory generation. Although MVA induced accelerated central memory T cell generation, which could be efficiently boosted by subsequent Ad administration, it failed to protect against malaria. In contrast, Ad vectors, which permit persistent Ag delivery, elicit a prolonged effector T cell and T(EM) response that requires long intervals for an efficient boost. A preferential T(EM) phenotype was maintained in liver, blood, and spleen after Ad/MVA prime-boost regimens, and animals were protected against malaria sporozoite challenge. Blood CD8(+) T(EM) cells correlated with protection against malaria liver-stage infection, assessed by estimation of number of parasites emerging from the liver into the blood. The protective ability of Ag-specific T(EM) cells was confirmed by transfer experiments into naive recipient mice. Thus, we identify persistent CD8 T(EM) populations as essential for vaccine-induced pre-erythrocytic protection against malaria, a finding that has important implications for vaccine design.     

Prolonged antigen expression following DNA vaccination impairs effector CD8+ T cell function and memory development

After priming, naive T cells undergo a program of expansion, contraction, and memory formation. Numerous studies have indicated that only a brief period of antigenic stimulation is required to fully commit CD8+ T cells to this program. Nonetheless, the persistence of Ag may modulate the eventual fate of CD8+ T cells. Using DNA delivery, we showed previously that direct presentation primes high levels of effector CD8+ T cells as compared with cross-presentation. One explanation now revealed is that prolonged cross-presentation limits effector cell expansion and function. To analyze this, we used a drug-responsive system to regulate Ag expression after DNA injection. Reducing expression to a single burst expanded greater numbers of peptide-specific effector CD8+ T cells than sustained Ag. Consequences for memory development were assessed after boosting and showed that, although persistent Ag maintained higher numbers of tetramer-positive CD8+ T cells, these expanded less (approximately 4-fold) than those induced by transient Ag expression (approximately 35-fold). Transient expression at priming therefore led to a net higher secondary response. In terms of vaccine design, we propose that the most effective DNA-based CD8+ T cell vaccines will be those that deliver a short burst of Ag.     

CD11b expression identifies CD8+CD28+ T lymphocytes with phenotype and function of both naive/memory and effector cells

A previously unreported CD8(+)CD28(+)CD11b(+) T cell subset occurs in healthy individuals and expands in patients suffering from primary viral infections. In functional terms, these cells share the features of naive/memory CD8(+)CD28(+)CD11b(-) and terminally differentiated effector CD8(+)CD28(-)CD11b(+) subpopulations. Like CD28(-) cells, CD28(+)CD11b(+) lymphocytes have the ability to produce IFN-gamma, to express perforin granules in vivo, and to exert a potent cytolytic activity. Moreover, these cells can respond to chemotactic stimuli and can efficiently cross the endothelial barrier. In contrast, like their CD11b(-) counterpart, they still produce IL-2 and retain the ability to proliferate following mitogenic stimuli. The same CD28(+)CD11b(+) subpopulation detected in vivo could be generated by culturing naive CD28(+)CD11b(-) cells in the presence of mitogenic stimuli following the acquisition of a CD45RO(+) memory phenotype. Considering both phenotypic and functional properties, we argue that this subset may therefore constitute an intermediate phenotype in the process of CD8(+) T cell differentiation and that the CD11b marker expression can distinguish between memory- and effector-type T cells in the human CD8(+)CD28(+) T cell subset.     

CD4+ T cells modulate expansion and survival but not functional properties of effector and memory CD8+ T cells induced by malaria sporozoites

CD4⁺ helper T cells are critical orchestrators of immune responses to infection and vaccination. During primary responses, naïve CD8⁺ T cells may need “CD4 help” for optimal development of memory populations. The immunological factors attributed to CD4 help depend on the context of immunization and vary depending on the priming system. In response to immunization with radiation-attenuated Plasmodium yoelii sporozoites, CD8⁺ T cells in BALB/c mice fail to generate large numbers of effector cells without help from CD4⁺ T cells – a defect not observed in most systems. Given this unique early dependence on CD4 help, we evaluated the effects of CD4⁺ cells on the development of functional properties of CD8⁺ T cells and on their ability to abolish infection. First, we determined that this effect was not mediated by CD4⁺ non-T cells and did not involve CD1d-restricted NKT cells. We found that CD8⁺ T cells induced by sporozoites without CD4 help formed memory populations severely reduced in magnitude that could not limit parasite development in the liver. The inability of these “helpless” memory T cells to protect is not a result of defects in effector function, as their capacity to produce cytokines and undergo cytotoxic degranulation was indistinguishable from control memory T cells. These data indicate that CD4⁺ T help may not be necessary to develop the functional attributes of CD8⁺ T cells; however they are crucial to ensure the survival of effector and memory cells induced in primary responses.     

HIV-1-specific memory CD4+ T cells are phenotypically less mature than cytomegalovirus-specific memory CD4+ T cells

HIV-1-specific CD4(+) T cells are qualitatively dysfunctional in the majority of HIV-1-infected individuals and are thus unable to effectively control viral replication. The current study extensively details the maturational phenotype of memory CD4(+) T cells directed against HIV-1 and CMV. We find that HIV-1-specific CD4(+) T cells are skewed to an early central memory phenotype, whereas CMV-specific CD4(+) T cells generally display a late effector memory phenotype. These differences hold true for both IFN-gamma- and IL-2-producing virus-specific CD4(+) T cells, are present during all disease stages, and persist even after highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). In addition, after HAART, HIV-1-specific CD4(+) T cells are enriched for CD27(+)CD28(-)-expressing cells, a rare phenotype, reflecting an early intermediate stage of differentiation. We found no correlation between differentiation phenotype of HIV-1-specific CD4(+) T cells and HIV-1 plasma viral load or HIV-1 disease progression. Surprisingly, HIV-1 viral load affected the maturational phenotype of CMV-specific CD4(+) T cells toward an earlier, less-differentiated state. In summary, our data indicate that the maturational state of HIV-1-specific CD4(+) T cells cannot be a sole explanation for loss of containment of HIV-1. However, HIV-1 replication can affect the phenotype of CD4(+) T cells of other specificities, which might adversely affect their ability to control those pathogens. The role for HIV-1-specific CD4(+) T cells expressing CD27(+)CD28(-) after HAART remains to be determined.     

Human effector memory CD4+ T cells directly recognize allogeneic endothelial cells in vitro and in vivo

The frequency of circulating alloreactive human memory T cells correlates with allograft rejection. Memory T cells may be divided into effector memory (T(EM)) and central memory (T(CM)) cell subsets, but their specific roles in allograft rejection are unknown. We report that CD4+ T(EM) (CD45RO+ CCR7- CD62L-) can be adoptively transferred readily into C.B-17 SCID/bg mice and mediate the destruction of human endothelial cells (EC) in vascularized human skin grafts allogeneic to the T cell donor. In contrast, CD4+ T(CM) (CD45RO+ CCR7+ CD62L+) are inefficiently transferred and do not mediate EC injury. In vitro, CD4+ T(EM) secrete more IFN-gamma within 48 h in response to allogeneic ECs than do T(CM). In contrast, T(EM) and T(CM) secrete comparable amounts of IFN-gamma in response to allogeneic monocytes (Mo). In the same cultures, both T(EM) and T(CM) produce IL-2 and proliferate in response to IFN-gamma-treated allogeneic human EC or Mo, but T(CM) respond more vigorously in both assays. Blockade of LFA-3 strongly inhibits both IL-2 and IFN-gamma secretion by CD4+ T(EM) cultured with allogeneic EC but only minimally inhibits responses to allogeneic Mo. Blockade of CD80 and CD86 strongly inhibits IL-2 but not IFN-gamma production by in response to allogeneic EC or Mo. Transduction of EC to express B7-2 enhances allogeneic T(EM) production of IL-2 but not IFN-gamma. We conclude that human CD4+ T(EM) directly recognize and respond to allogeneic EC in vitro by secreting IFN-gamma and that this response depends on CD2 but not CD28. Consistent with EC activation of effector functions, human CD4+ T(EM) can mediate allogeneic EC injury in vivo.     

Suppression of CD4+ T lymphocyte effector functions by CD4+CD25+ cells in vivo

CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells have been extensively studied during the last decade, but how these cells exert their regulatory function on pathogenic effector T cells remains to be elucidated. Naive CD4+ T cells transferred into T cell-deficient mice strongly expand and rapidly induce inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Onset of this inflammatory disorder depends on IFN-gamma production by expanding CD4+ T cells. Coinjection of CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells protects recipient mice from IBD. In this study, we show that CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells do not affect the initial activation/proliferation of injected naive T cells as well as their differentiation into Th1 effectors. Moreover, naive T cells injected together with CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells into lymphopenic hosts are still able to respond to stimuli in vitro when regulatory T cells are removed. In these conditions, they produce as much IFN-gamma as before injection or when injected alone. Finally, when purified, they are able to induce IBD upon reinjection into lymphopenic hosts. Thus, prevention of IBD by CD4+CD25+ regulatory T cells is not due to deletion of pathogenic T cells, induction of a non reactive state (anergy) among pathogenic effector T cells, or preferential induction of Th2 effectors rather than Th1 effectors; rather, it results from suppression of T lymphocyte effector functions, leading to regulated responses to self.     

CD4+CD25+ and CD4+CD25- T cells act respectively as inducer and effector T suppressor cells in superantigen-induced tolerance

The repeated injection of low doses of bacterial superantigens (SAg) is known to induce specific T cell unresponsiveness. We show in this study that the spleen of BALB/c mice receiving chronically, staphylococcal enterotoxin B (SEB) contains SEB-specific CD4(+) TCRBV8(+) T cells exerting an immune regulatory function on SEB-specific primary T cell responses. Suppression affects IL-2 and IFN-gamma secretion as well as proliferation of T cells. However, the suppressor cells differ from the natural CD4(+) T regulatory cells, described recently in human and mouse, because they do not express cell surface CD25. They are CD152 (CTLA-4)-negative and their regulatory activity is not associated with expression of the NF Foxp3. By contrast, after repeated SEB injection, CD4(+)CD25(+) splenocytes were heterogenous and contained both effector as well as regulatory cells. In vivo, CD4(+)CD25(-) T regulatory cells prevented SEB-induced death independently of CD4(+)CD25(+) T cells. Nevertheless, SEB-induced tolerance could not be achieved in thymectomized CD25(+) cell-depleted mice because repeated injection of SEB did not avert lethal toxic shock in these animals. Collectively, these data demonstrate that, whereas CD4(+)CD25(+) T regulatory cells are required for the induction of SAg-induced tolerance, CD4(+)CD25(-) T cells exert their regulatory activity at the maintenance stage of SAg-specific unresponsiveness.     

Antigen-specific CD8+ T cells and the development of central memory during Mycobacterium tuberculosis infection

Whether true memory T cells develop in the face of chronic infection such as tuberculosis remains controversial. To address this question, we studied CD8+ T cells specific for the Mycobacterium tuberculosis ESAT6-related Ags TB10.3 and TB10.4. The shared epitope TB10.3/10.4(20-28) is presented by H-2 K(d), and 20-30% of the CD8+ T cells in the lungs of chronically infected mice are specific for this Ag following respiratory infection with M. tuberculosis. These TB10.3/10.4(20-28)-specific CD8+ T cells produce IFN-gamma and TNF and express CD107 on their cell surface, which indicates their likely role as CTL in vivo. Nearly all of the Ag-specific CD8+ T cells in the lungs of chronically infected mice had a T effector cell phenotype based on their low expression of CD62L and CD45RB. In contrast, a population of TB10.3/10.4(20-28)-specific CD8+ T cells was identified in the lymphoid organs that express high levels of CD62L and CD45RB. Antibiotic treatment to resolve the infection led to a contraction of the Ag-specific CD8+ T cell population and was accompanied by an increase in the proportion of CD8+ T cells with a central memory phenotype. Finally, challenge of memory-immune mice with M. tuberculosis was accompanied by significant expansion of TB10.3/10.4(20-28)-specific CD8+ T cells, which suggests that these cells are in fact functional memory T cells.