Comparison of plasma sample purification by manual liquid–liquid extraction, automated 96-well liquid–liquid extraction and automated 96-well solid-phase extraction for analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry

Three extraction procedures were developed for the quantitative determination of a carboxylic acid containing analyte (I) in human plasma by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) with negative ion electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (MS–MS). The first procedure was based on the manual liquid–liquid extraction (LLE) of the acidified plasma samples with methyl tert.-butyl ether. The second procedure was based on the automation of the manual LLE procedure using 96-well collection plates and a robotic liquid handling system. The third approach was based on automated solid-phase extraction (SPE) using 96-well SPE plates and a robotic liquid handling system. A lower limit of quantitation of 50 pg/ml was achieved using all three extraction procedures. The total time required to prepare calibration curve standards, aliquot the standards and plasma samples, and process a total of 96 standards and samples by manual LLE was three-times longer than the time required for 96-well SPE or 96-well LLE (4 h, 50 min vs. 1 h, 43 min). Even more importantly, the time the bioanalyst physically spent on the 96-well LLE or 96-well SPE procedure was only a small fraction of the time spent on the manual LLE procedure (<10 min vs. 4 h, 10 min). It should be noted that the 96-well SPE procedure incorporated the two steps of evaporation of the eluates to dryness and subsequent reconstitution of the dried extract. The total time required for the 96-well SPE could be reduced by 50% if the eluates were injected directly, eliminating the drying and reconstitution steps, which is achievable when sensitivity is less of an issue.     

Selfish operons: the evolutionary impact of gene clustering in prokaryotes and eukaryotes

The Selfish Operon Model postulates that the organization of bacterial genes into operons is beneficial to the constituent genes in that proximity allows horizontal cotransfer of all genes required for a selectable phenotype; eukaryotic operons formed for very different reasons. Horizontal transfer of selfish operons most probably promotes bacterial diversification.     

Microbiology: Paper alert

A selection of interesting papers that were published in the two months before our press date in major journals most likely to report significant results in microbiology.     

Pharmaceutical biotechnology: Chemical biotechnology: Web alert

A selection of World Wide Web sites relevant to papers published in this issue of Current Opinion in Biotechnology.     

Shaping the genome--restriction-modification systems as mobile genetic elements

A restriction enzyme gene is often linked to a modification methylase gene the role of which is to protect a recognition site on DNA from breakage by the former. Loss of some restriction-modification gene complexes leads to cell death through restriction breakage in the genome. Their behavior as genomic parasites/symbionts may explain the distribution of restriction sites and clarify certain aspects of bacterial recombination repair and mutagenesis. A comparison of bacterial genomes supports the hypothesis that restriction-modification gene complexes are mobile elements involved in various genome rearrangements and evolution.     

Interspersed repeats and other mementos of transposable elements in mammalian genomes

The bulk of the human genome is ultimately derived from transposable elements. Observations in the past year lead to some new and surprising ideas on functions and consequences of these elements and their remnants in our genome. The many new examples of human genes derived from single transposon insertions highlight the large contribution of selfish DNA to genomic evolution.     

Web alert. Biopolymers model systems

A selection of World Wide Web sites relevant to papers published in this issue of Current Opinion in Chemical Biology.     

Growth and development. Web alert

A selection of World Wide Web sites relevant to the reviews published in this issue of Current Opinion in Microbiology.     

Contribution of genomics to bacterial pathogenesis

Genomics is changing the landscape of modern biology. The impact is far-reaching because it provides both the most economical means of acquiring large amounts of information and because it has forced the creation of new technologies to exploit this information. Five of the six genomes published in the year from August 1998 to August 1999 were human pathogens, all of which are highly host-adapted. Four of these are obligate intracellular pathogens and the study of these genomes is providing novel insights into the intricacies of pathogen-host interactions and co-evolution. These genomes are also significant because they mark the beginning of an important trend in the sequencing of closely related genomes, including the sequencing of more than one strain from a single pathogenic species. As comparative genomics truly comes of age, the ability to compare the genomes of pathogenic and non-pathogenic organisms will hopefully provide insight into what makes certain bacterial strains and species pathogens.     

Insights into the evolutionary process of genome degradation

Studies of noncoding and pseudogene sequence diversity, particularly in Rickettsia, have begun to reveal the basic principles of genome degradation in microorganisms. Increasingly, studies of genes and genomes suggest that there has been an extensive amount of horizontal gene transfer among microorganisms. As this inflow of genetic material does not seem generally to have resulted in genome size expansions, however, degenerative processes must be at the very least as widespread as horizontal gene transfer. The basic principles of gene degradation and elimination that are being explored in Rickettsia are likely to be of major importance for our understanding of how microbial genomes evolve.     

Orthologs, paralogs and genome comparisons

During the past decade, ancient gene duplications were recognized as one of the main forces in the generation of diverse gene families and the creation of new functional capabilities. New tools developed to search data banks for homologous sequences, and an increased availability of reliable three-dimensional structural information led to the recognition that proteins with diverse functions can belong to the same superfamily. Analyses of the evolution of these superfamilies promises to provide insights into early evolution but are complicated by several important evolutionary processes. Horizontal transfer of genes can lead to a vertical spread of innovations among organisms, therefore finding a certain property in some descendants of an ancestor does not guarantee that it was present in that ancestor. Complete or partial gene conversion between duplicated genes can yield phylogenetic trees with several, apparently independent gene duplications, suggesting an often surprising parallelism in the evolution of independent lineages. Additionally, the breakup of domains within a protein and the fusion of domains into multifunctional proteins makes the delineation of superfamilies a task that remains difficult to automate.     

The nature of the last universal common ancestor

Cytologically, prokaryotes appear simpler and thus evolutionarily 'older' than eukaryotes. In terms of RNA processing, however, prokaryotes are sophisticated and eukaryotes, which retain many features of an RNA-world, appear primitive. The last universal common ancestor may have been mesophilic and could have had many features of the eukaryote genome, but its cytology is unknown.     

Comparative genomics and evolutionary biology

Data of large-scale DNA sequencing are relevant to some of the most fundamental issues in evolutionary biology: suboptimality, homology, hierarchy, ancestry, novelties, the role of natural selection, and the relative importance of directional versus stabilizing selection. Already, these data provided the best available evidence for some evolutionary phenomena, and in several cases led to refinement of old concepts. Still, the Darwinian evolutionary paradigm will successfully accommodate comparative genomics.