Comparison between the biological effects of LH-RH and buserelin on the induction of LH release from hemi-pituitary glands of female rats in vitro

The biological effects of LH-RH and the agonist [D-Ser(But)6-des Gly10]-LH-RH(1-9)-ethylamide (buserelin) were compared during 8 h of incubation with female rat hemi-pituitary glands. Similar dose-response relationships were found for LH-RH and buserelin as concerns the release of luteinizing hormone (LH) by pituitary glands from intact and ovariectomized rats. Also the LH secretion patterns from glands of intact rats were similar: an initial low response was followed by a fast increase (priming effect) after which the response declined again (desensitization). In a subsequent experiment pituitary glands from ovariectomized rats were first exposed to LH-RH or buserelin for 4 h and then further incubated in medium only. After discontinuation of the stimuli the rate of LH release decreased in all cases, but this decrease was significantly greater when the glands had been exposed to LH-RH. Short-term (1/2, 1 or 2 h) exposures to LH-RH or buserelin followed by an intervening period (1 1/2, 1 or 0 h, respectively) of incubation in medium only resulted in an almost similar, significant increase in the subsequent protein synthesis-independent LH response to LH-RH (priming effect). Only preincubation with LH-RH for 2 h was significantly more effective. The results demonstrate equal intrinsic activities for LH-RH and buserelin. Differences in the biopotencies for LH-RH and buserelin in vivo and in vitro may occur only after discontinuation of the external stimuli.     

Use of buserelin to induce ovulation in the cyclic mare

Inducing ovulation in a cyclic mare is often necessary. For this purpose, hCG has been used commonly, but the response can be reduced after successive administrations. The aims of this study were to test the effectiveness of buserelin in hastening ovulation in estrus mares, and its influence on fertility; and to investigate the effect of treatment on LH secretion. Five crossover trials were designed to compare the effect of two treatments: buserelin (40 microg in 4 doses i.v. at 12 h intervals) vs placebo (Experiments 1 and 2); buserelin 40 microg (in 4 doses i.v.) vs 20 microg (Experiment 3); buserelin (4 doses of 20 microg i.v.) vs hCG (1 dose of 2,500 IU i.v.) (Experiment 4); or buserelin (3 doses of 13.3 microg at 6 h interval) vs hCG (Experiment 5). In Experiment 2, blood samples were taken hourly until ovulation, for LH measurements. In Experiment 1, buserelin treatment significantly hastened ovulation. Reduction of the dose by half (Experiment 3) did not alter the effectiveness. In Experiments 4 and 5, buserelin was as effective as hCG in inducing ovulation between 24 and 48 h after initiation of treatment. Buserelin treatment induced a rise in LH concentration during the 48 h period of the experiment, and LH concentrations before ovulation were significantly higher in buserelin treated cycles than in placebo cycles. These experiments demonstrated the usefulness of two new protocols of administration of buserelin, as an alternative to hCG for induction of ovulation. One hypothesis explaining the mechanism of action is that the persistant rise in LH concentration could modify the ratio of biological/immunological LH, as it occurs physiologically, thereby hastening ovulation.     

Ultrastructural observations of granule extrusion from rat anterior pituitary cells after injection of LH-releasing hormone

Summary In order to observe the ultrastructural aspects of granule extrusion from gonadotrophs, the authors injected pure, natural porcine LH-releasing hormone (LH-RH) into persistent-estrous (PE) rats. Clear-cut extrusions of secretory granules appeared from LH-gonadotrophs 2.5, 5 and 15 minutes after the injection. Massive extrusion was observed at 15 minutes. Serum LH and FSH were also estimated by radioimmunoassay on blood samples taken at the same times after the injections. LH was increased in the blood sera after the injection of LH-RH, but serum FSH was not significantly different among the various treated rats. The rise in serum LH after LH-RH injection was well correlated with the ultrastructural phenomenon of granule extrusion from LH-gonadotrophs.The study was supported by USPHS Grants AM 12583, AM 09094 and AM 07467.The authors acknowledge the able assistance of Mrs. Martha Castilleja in San Antonio and of Meredith M. Nickel in New Orleans.     

The prolonged action of the LHRH agonist buserelin (HOE 766) may be due to prolonged binding to the LHRH receptor

Hemi-pituitary glands of ovariectomized rats were superfused for 4 h with either LHRH or the analog buserelin (HOE 766) at several concentrations, and thereafter with medium only for another 1.5 h. In a further experiment glands were exposed for 2.5 h to LHRH or buserelin at a single concentration (5 ng/ml) and subsequently for another 2.5 h to either the same agonist (LHRH or buserelin) alone (5 ng/ml), the agonist plus an LHRH-antagonist (ORG 30093, 1000 ng/ml), the LHRH- antagonist alone, or medium alone. LHRH and buserelin stimulated gonadotropin release equally well. After cessation of this stimulation, the gonadotropin release by the buserelin-treated pituitary glands and the glands, treated with the highest dose of LHRH (1000 ng/ml), continued, while the release by the glands, treated with the lower doses of LHRH, declined. The LHRH-antagonist completely blocked the release of LH, stimulated by buserelin or LHRH, as well as the prolonged activation of the release, caused by buserelin pre-treatment. In a superfusion experiment with pituitary cell aggregates of 14-day-old intact female rats, buserelin stimulated the release of LH much more effectively than LHRH itself. Moreover, the release caused by buserelin declined more slowly after cessation of the stimulation. Finally, in a pituitary cell monolayer culture the Kd's of LHRH, buserelin and the antagonist were determined as 4.7 X 10(-9) M, 2.4 X 10(-10) M and 4.6 X 10(-9) respectively. It was concluded that the estimates of the potencies of LHRH and buserelin depend on the choice of the test-system. It is suggested that the long duration of action of buserelin is at least partly due to prolonged binding to the LHRH-receptor.     

Absence of effect of the peptide PHI-27 on LH release in vitro

The effects of PHI-27, a peptide of the glucagon-secretion family, on luteinizing hormone (LH) release and on LH-releasing hormone (LH-RH)- or estradiol-induced LH release were examined in a sequential double chamber perifusion system by perifusing the pituitary alone or in sequence with the mediobasal hypothalamus (MBH) from normal female rats in diestrus. PHI at 10(-7) M had no significant effect on LH release from the pituitary in series with the MBH. Moreover, on perifusion of the pituitary alone with medium containing 10(-7) M PHI, LH release induced by 20 ng/ml LH-RH from the pituitary was not significantly different from that without PHI. Furthermore, PHI had no effect on estradiol-induced LH release from the pituitary in sequence with the MBH. These data indicate that PHI has no effect on LH release in vitro.     

Comparison of mammalian luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH), and of an analog (ICI 118630), on luteinizing hormone and ovarian steroid (progesterone, oestradiol) secretions in laying hens. (Gallus domesticus)

This experiment was conducted to compare the luteinizing hormone (LH), progesterone (P4) and oestradiol (E2) release in response to injections of various doses of synthetic mammalian luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) and of an LH-RH agonist, ICI 118630, administered to laying hens 4 to 9 hours after a mid-sequence ovulation. Plasma LH increased significantly within 10 minutes of injection of either compound whereas any increases in plasma steroid concentrations were discerned later, at approximately minutes post-injection. No dose-response relationship was found for either compound with respect to LH release, but ICI 118630 appeared more potent than LH-RH. This analog also produced a greater mean incremental rise in plasma progesterone, but not oestradiol, than LH-RH, and this was found in animals injected at a time when the largest ovarian follicle was not mature. These result suggest that ICI 118630 is a more potent releasing hormone in the hen at the level of the pituitary, and that it may have a stimulating effect on ovarian progesterone secretion.     

Hypothalamic deafferentation and luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone effects on secretion of luteinizing hormone in prepubertal pigs

The control of luteinizing hormone (LH) secretion was investigated in ovariectomized, prepubertal Yorkshire pigs by comparing the effects of anterior (AHD), complete (CHD), and posterior (PHD) hypothalamic deafferentation to sham-operated controls (SOC). Gilts (n = 16) were assigned randomly to treatments, fitted with an indwelling jugular catheter, and ovariectomized 2 days before deafferentation or sham-operation (Day 0). Blood for radioimmunoassay (RIA) of LH was collected sequentially at 20-min intervals for a period of 2 h before and 24, 48, 72, and 96 h after hypothalamic deafferentation or SOC. Episodic LH release after AHD or CHD was abolished (p less than 0.01), but not after PHD or SOC. Concentrations of serum LH in AHD and CHD dropped (p less than 0.01) at 24 and 48 h after surgery. Levels of LH before and after surgery in PHD and SOC were similar (p greater than 0.05). Infusion of 25 micrograms LH-releasing hormone (LHRH) i.v. at 72 and 96 h after hypothalamic deafferentation and SOC increased (p less than 0.01) serum LH to peak levels within 15 min. after infusion; LH returned to basal levels 60-80 min later. By 96 h after surgery, LH response to LH-releasing hormone (LHRH) was less in AHD and CHD as compared with the response at 72 h postinjection. Concentrations of LH in PHD and SOC were similar (p greater than 0.05) at 72 and 96 h, respectively. The results from this study clearly indicate that neural stimuli originating or traversing the neural areas rostral to the median eminence are required for secretion of LH in the pig.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Ethanol inhibits the naloxone-induced release of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone from the hypothalamus of the male rat

It has been inferred that ethanol suppresses the secretion of luteinizing hormone (LH) in the male by depressing the release of LH-releasing hormone (LH-RH) from the hypothalamus. Direct support for this inference has been difficult to obtain, however, because of significant technical difficulties in measuring LH-RH release under in vivo conditions. To circumvent these problems, we made use of the opiate antagonist naloxone, as a neuroendocrine probe, to elicit the release of LH-RH under in vivo conditions. We found that ethanol was a potent suppressor of the increase in serum LH levels evoked by naloxone at extremely low blood ethanol concentrations ( less than 60 mg/dl). Furthermore, we observed that the antagonism between ethanol and naloxone appeared to be competitive in nature since a fixed dose of ethanol (1 g/kg, blood ethanol concentration 60 mg/dl) shifted the naloxone dose-response curve significantly to the right and high doses of the antagonist overcame ethanol's effects. Finally, we found that the interaction between ethanol and naloxone took place at the level of the hypothalamus. Our results, therefore, seem to provide the first in vivo evidence supporting the widely-held hypothesis that ethanol reduces serum LH levels by depressing the hypothalamically-medicated release of LH-RH. The mechanisms underlying ethanol's depression of naloxone-induced increases in the release of LH-RH are not fully understood at this time, but one prominent possibility is that ethanol enhances the synthesis or release of endogenous opioids which in turn override naloxone's effects.     

Hormone responses to low-dose GnRH treatment in post-partum beef cows

Acyclic beef cows received 1.0, 2.5 or 5.0 micrograms GnRH/2 h for 48 h as 24 X 2 h repeated i.v. injections or by continuous i.v. infusion. Preovulatory-type LH surges were detected in 9/18 injected and 8/15 infused cows and occurred 30.6 +/- 5.1 h and 3.3 +/- 0.7 h after the start of treatment respectively. Cows receiving the lowest infusion dose did not exhibit gonadotrophin surges. The LH response to individual injections increased with dose but the proportion of injected cows showing preovulatory-type surges at each dose level did not change. A total of 20 cows (10 injected and 10 infused) showed evidence of luteal activity within 7 days of the end of GnRH treatment, although this was transitory in most animals. Cows which exhibited preovulatory-type LH surges in response to treatment had significantly higher plasma oestradiol-17 beta concentrations and lower FSH concentrations before treatment than those which did not. The results suggest that the LH response to GnRH treatment is dependent on follicular status in the immediate pretreatment period.     

Relationship between release of LH and incorporation of tritiated thymidine in the anterior pituitary gland of the castrated male rat: effect of LHRH and its highly active analogue buserelin

Castration of the adult male rat significantly (P less than 0.01) increased the concentration of LH in serum and the incorporation of (3H) thymidine into the pituitary DNA. The administration of a single dose of LHRH or its analogue buserelin stimulated the release of LH but it did not modify (3H) thymidine incorporation. When multiple doses of LHRH or buserelin were injected, there was a significant (P less than 0.01) inhibition of LH release and also the incorporation of (3H) thymidine into the DNA of the anterior pituitary gland was significantly (P less than 0.01) diminished. These observations are compatible with the idea of the close relationship between hormonal release and DNA synthesis in the anterior pituitary gland of the rat.     

Effect of prolonged administration of small doses of LH-RH and LH-RH analogue [D-Ser (But)6] Des Gly-NH210 ethylamide on the release of LH and induction of ovulation in mid-anoestrous ewes

A natural process of LH release and induction of ovulation in anoestrous ewes was simulated by prolonged administration of small doses of LH-RH and its analogue [D-Ser(But)⁶] Des Gly-NH₂¹⁰ ethylamide. In the first series of experiments on 40 Merino ewes infusions of LH-RH were made into the maxillaris interna artery for 6 consecutive days for 6 h each day. Total doses of 24.0, 26.0, 28.0 and 32.0 μg per animal of varying and progressively increasing daily quantities of the hormone were administered in groups I, II, III and IV, respectively. In group V the animals were infused with a total dose of 28.0 μg LH-RH and injected additionally i.m. with 3.0 μg 17β-oestradiol on days 4 and 5 of the infusion of LH-RH. Ovulation did not occur earlier than days 4, 5 and 6 after the beginning of infusions. The highest number of positive reactions occurred in group IV ($\text{8}\text{10}$) and in group V ($\text{7}\text{8}$ animals). The pattern of LH peaks in general was correlated with the time of ovulations. The LH concentrations of the preovulatory peaks in experimental ewes were mostly lower than those in naturally ovulating animals. The corpora lutea were functional during the first 7 days after ovulation.In the second series of experiments on 26 Merino ewes the LH-RH analogue [D-Ser -(But)⁶] Des Gly-NH₂¹⁰ ethylamide was injected i.m. or i.a. for 6 consecutive days. Total doses of 15.5, 9.5 and 7.5 μg of the analogue per animal, administered at varying and progressively increasing daily doses in respective groups, induced several surges of LH in the same individuals for 2 or even 3 consecutive days. Corpora lutea and degenerating follicles in the form of cysts were found in the ovaries of animals of these groups. Very small daily doses ranging from 0.1 μg administered during the first 3 days, to 1.5 μg on day 5 of the treatment, released one surge of LH on day 5 of the treatment in all individuals with peaks ranging from 30.0 to 58.0 ng/ml and induction of ovulation with almost normal luteal function. On the basis of these experiments it is suggested that the evaluation of the effect of active substance (LH-RH or its analogue), its suitability and application of rightly chosen doses to induce the full physiological process of ovulation should be based not only on the release of LH and luteal function but also on tests of the ability of the released ovum to undergo fertilization and its further development.     

Impaired LH-RH release by estrogen in women with sulpiride-induced hyperprolactinemia

The effects of hyperprolactinemia on the release of immunoreactive luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) in response to iv injection of 20 mg conjugated estrogens (Premarin) were studied. Five normal cycling women were injected with Premarin on the morning of the 7th day of the first cycle (control cycle), and then the plasma levels of LH-RH, LH, and prolactin (PRL) were determined every 8 to 16 hours for 72 h. Two months later, the same women received 200 mg of oral sulpiride daily for 8 days from the 3rd day of the cycle (sulpiride treated cycle), and then the same protocol as in the control cycle was applied. Mean (+/- SE) plasma levels of PRL on day 7 in the sulpiride treated cycle were significantly higher than those in the control cycle (118 +/- 24 ng/ml vs. 14 +/- 4 ng/ml, p less than 0.001). After estrogen injection, the mean percent increases in immunoreactive LH-RH at 32 h (control: 71 +/- 38% vs. sulpiride: 6 +/- 36%) and 40 h (154 +/- 38% vs. -5 +/- 21%) and in LH at the 48 h (175 +/- 89% vs. 57 +/- 57%) and 56 h (99 +/- 32% vs. 7 +/- 21%) were significantly (p less than 0.01 or p less than 0.05) suppressed in the sulpiride cycle. These data suggest that the impaired positive feedback effect of estrogen on LH-release in hyperprolactinemic anovulatory women may be caused, at least in part, by disturbed LH-RH release.     

Independence of progesterone blockade of the luteinizing hormone surge in ewes from opioid activity at naloxone-sensitive receptors.

Fifteen ovariectomized ewes were treated with implants (s.c.) creating circulating luteal progesterone concentrations of 1.6 +/- 0.1 ng ml-1 serum. Ten days later, progesterone implants were removed from five ewes which were then infused with saline for 64 h (0.154 mol NaCl l-1, 20 ml h-1, i.v.). Ewes with progesterone implants remaining were infused with saline (n = 5) or naloxone (0.5 mg kg-1 h-1, n = 5) in saline for 64 h. At 36 h of infusion, all ewes were injected with oestradiol (20 micrograms in 1 ml groundnut oil, i.m.). During the first 36 h of infusion, serum luteinizing hormone (LH) concentrations were similar in ewes infused with saline after progesterone withdrawal and ewes infused with naloxone, but with progesterone implants remaining (1.23 +/- 0.11 and 1.28 +/- 0.23 ng ml-1 serum, respectively, mean +/- SEM, P greater than 0.05). These values exceeded circulating LH concentrations during the first 36 h of saline infusion of ewes with progesterone implants remaining (0.59 +/- 0.09 ng ml-1 serum, P less than 0.05). The data suggested that progesterone suppression of tonic LH secretion, before oestradiol injection, was completely antagonized by naloxone. After oestradiol injection, circulating LH concentrations decreased for about 10 h in ewes of all groups. A surge in circulating LH concentrations peaked 24 h after oestradiol injection in ewes infused with saline after progesterone withdrawal (8.16 +/- 3.18 ng LH ml-1 serum).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Effect of post-mating GnRH analogue (buserelin) treatment on PGF2alpha release in ewes and ewe lambs

The objectives of this study were to determine the effects of buserelin or saline treatment on ovarian function (Experiment 1), plasma PGFM concentrations and oxytocin stimulated prostaglandin F(2alpha) (PGF(2alpha)) release (Experiment 2) in ewe lambs and ewes. Welsh Halfbred ewes (n=26) and ewe lambs (n=24) were mated to vasectomised rams at synchronised oestrus and on Day 12 post-mating each animal was injected intramuscularly either normal saline or 4 microg buserelin. In Experiment 1, plasma progesterone and oestradiol concentrations were determined in samples collected by jugular venepuncture 1h before and at 0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 24, 48 and 72 h after treatment (n=7 per treatment group). Progesterone concentrations increased (P<0.05) from 2 to 8h after buserelin treatment and returned to basal levels after 72 h, whereas oestradiol concentrations were maximal at 2h post-treatment and returned to basal levels after 24h (P<0.05). Oestradiol concentrations were lower (P<0.05) in buserelin-treated animals than controls at 72 h post-treatment. Basal and post-treatment progesterone concentrations were greater (P<0.05) in ewes than in ewe lambs but oestradiol levels were similar for both age groups. Ovulation rate, determined by laparoscopy on Day 14, was similar for both age groups (ewes 1.1; ewe lambs 1.0). Buserelin treatment induced accessory corpora lutea in ewes (4/7; 57%) but not in ewe lambs (0/7; 0%). In the Experiment 2, plasma PGFM concentrations were determined in samples collected at 20-min intervals for 6h on Day 14 and at 20-min intervals for 1h before and at 10-min intervals for 1h and then at 20-min intervals for a further 3h period after an intravenous injection of oxytocin (1IU/kg body weight) on Day 15 post-oestrus. In this experiment there were five ewe lambs and six ewes per treatment group. There was no effect of buserelin treatment or age on basal PGFM concentrations on either Day 14 or 15. Although peak PGFM concentrations tended to be lower in buserelin-treated animals, the difference was not significant (P>0.05). However, peak duration following oxytocin challenge on Day 15 post-mating was shorter (P<0.05) in control ewes compared with control ewe lambs. In conclusion, buserelin treatment given on Day 12 post-oestrus enhances luteal function more in ewes than ewe lambs and after a transitory increase, reduces oestradiol concentrations in both ewes and ewe lambs. However, buserelin treatment does not significantly attenuate the luteolytic signal.     

The acute effects of oestradiol-17beta and synthetic LH-RH on plasma LH levels in freemartin heifers.

Injection of oestradiol was followed by a surge of plasma LH within 24 h in only 7 of 12 freemartins. Elevations of plasma LH were less than those reported for normal non-cyclic heifers, but some freemartins showed a delayed, or more prolonged, LH response. Responsiveness to oestradiol was not related to degree of chimaerism or plasma androstenedione level, and most of the animals responded similarly in two trials carried out 4 months apart, during which time plasma androstenedione levels had more than doubled. Freemartins which showed an LH surge after oestradiol treatment released greater amounts of LH after the injection of LH-RH than did non-responders.     

Synthesis and biological properties of (D-Ala-6, des-Gly-NH2-10)-LH-RH ethylamide, a peptide with greatly enhanced LH- and FSH- releasing activity

A nonapeptide analog of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH), [D-Ala⁶, des-Gly-NH₂¹⁰]-LH-RH ethylamide, was prepared by solid-phase methodology. The peptide was assayed against LH-RH in two $\text{in vivo}$ systems and was found to be many times more potent than the naturally occurring hormone. In one of the tests, based on elevation of LH and FSH levels after infusion into immature male rats, the analog showed LH-releasing activity of 1600% and FSH-releasing activity of 1200% compared to LH-RH.     

Indomethacin and gonadotrophin release from rat pituitaries.

The influence of low (5 mcM) and high (200 mcM) concentrations of indomethacin on gonadotropin release from rat pituitaries was studied in vitro. Low concentrations significantly (p less than .05) reduced the release of luteinizing hormone (LH) in comparison with controls, whereas high concentrations significantly (p less than .05) increased the rate of release. The release of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH) was not affected. When pituitary tissue was stimulated by LH-releasing hormone (LH-RH), the high concentration of indomethacin significantly (p less than .05) increased LH release and produced a nearly significant (p less than .01) increase in FSH. The low concentration was without effect. The effect of the addition of prostaglandins (PGs) alone and in combination with indomethacin was also investigated. PGE-1 significantly (p less than .05) increased the release of LH. However, there was no significant (p greater than .1) interaction between the 2 drugs. The effects on the release of FSH were similar. The addition of PGE-2 or PGF-2alpha slightly increased the release of LH and FSH (p greater than .1). It is suggested that high concentrations of indomethacin probably do not inhibit PG synthesis, but may inhibit cyclic nucleotide phosphodiesterase.     

Self-priming effect of LH-RH on pituitary gonadotropins in hyperprolactinemic women

To investigate how various concentrations of serum prolactin (PRL) influence the priming effect of luteinizing hormone releasing hormone (LH-RH) on the pituitary gland, 24 women with various blood PRL concentrations received intravenous injections of 100 micrograms of synthetic LH-RH twice at an interval of 60 minutes and their serum LH and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) were measured and analysed. In the follicular phase with a normal PRL concentration (PRL less than 20 ng/ml, n = 6), marked first peaks of the two hormones following the first LH-RH stimulation and enhanced second peaks after the second LH-RH administration were observed, indicating a typical priming effect of LH-RH on gonadotropins, though the second response of FSH was more moderate than that of LH. In hyperprolactinemia, in which the serum PRL concentration was higher than 70 ng/ml (n = 13), the basal concentration of gonadotropins was not significantly changed but the priming effect of LH-RH on LH and FSH was significantly decreased (p less than 0.01). No marked second peaks of LH and FSH were observed, suggesting an inhibitory effect of hyperprolactinemia on the second release of LH and FSH. In contrast, this effect was restored in a group of women whose serum PRL concentration was between 30 and 50 ng/ml (n = 5). Furthermore, enhanced second peaks of both LH and FSH were noted after successful bromocriptine therapy reduced hyperprolactinemia (PRL greater than 70 ng/ml) to less than 25 ng/ml (n = 5).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Inhibitory control of the pituitary LH secretion by LH-RH in male rats.

Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) was administered to prepubertal male rats (intact, castrate or castrate-adrenalectomized, 60 g body weight) for 28 days (1 microgram LH-RH/day, s.c.), at a 10-fold physiological dose, as compared to the minimal FSH-releasing dose of 100 ng/rat s.c. In intact rats, serum LH and weight of androgen-dependent organs (vented prostate, seminal vesicles) were reduced after 14 days of treatment. In castrate rats, the postcastration rise in serum LH was abolished by treatment. Pituitary LH content, FSH secretion and prolactin secretion were not suppressed. Hypothalamic LH-RH was increased at 14 and 21 days. In castrate adrenalectomized male rats, LH secretion was also suppressed by 1 microgram LH-RH s.c. x 28 days. The hypothalamic LH-RH content did not increase. The pituitary LH-RH receptor level was not down-regulated after 14 days treatment either in intact or castrate male rats. Pituitary inhibition (LH release) in rats by a supraphysiological dose of LH-RH given for 28 days indicates that the optimal regime for chronic treatment has to be determined by monitoring LH release at regular intervals. Direct pituitary inhibition by LH-RH may explain some of the unexpected antifertility effects observed with high doses of LH-RH.     

LH and testosterone responses to five doses of a GnRH analogue (buserelin acetate) in 12-month-old Thoroughbred colts

To determine the responsiveness of the pituitary-gonadal axis of peri-pubertal colts to GnRH, buserelin (0.5, 1, 5, 10 and 40 microg) was given to 13 male Thoroughbred yearlings ( n=3-8 colts per dose). Jugular venous blood samples were taken at -10, 0, 10, 20, 30, 40, 60, 120 and 180 min relative to buserelin administration. Increases (P < 0.05) in LH concentrations occurred in colts that received 5, 10, or 40 microg buserelin, but not in those that received 0.5 or 1 microg. Peak LH concentrations and mean area under the curve were higher (P < 0.05) in colts receiving 40 microg buserelin than in those that received 0.5 or 1 microg. Increases ( P< 0.05) in testosterone concentrations occurred in some, but not all, colts that received 1, 5, 10, or 40 microg buserelin. Neither peak concentration nor area under the curve of testosterone differed significantly among doses of buserelin. The percentage of horses that responded to the buserelin increased with increasing dose, with only the highest dose eliciting LH and testosterone responses in all colts. In conclusion, peri-pubertal colts exhibited a dose-response release of LH following buserelin treatment, but individual colts responded in an "all or nothing" manner, such that each either had an LH response or did not. Some colts that exhibited a significant LH response had no subsequent increase in plasma testosterone concentrations; perhaps the pituitary LH response may not have been great enough to stimulate the Leydig cells in these individuals.