A fluorimetric assay for guanine aminohydrolase

A rapid, sensitive, and versatile assay for guanine aminohydrolase is described. It is based on the difference in native fluorescence of guanine, the substrate, and xanthine, the reaction product when excitation and emission wavelengths are 285 nm and 345 nm, respectively.     

Characterization of purified guanine aminohydrolase.

Guanine aminohydrolase (GAH) (E.C. 3.5.4.3) was purified by affinity chromatography on 9-(p-β-aminoethoxyphenyl)guanine-Sepharose to a specific activity of 35.5 units/mg. The molecular weight of the enzyme was estimated to be 110,000 by gel filtration. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) showed that the enzyme was composed of subunits with molecular weights of approximately 52,000. Data from SDS-gel electrophoresis in a discontinuous buffer system and from isoelectric focusing in the presence of 8-m urea indicated that more than one type of subunit were present. This was consistent with multiple forms of the native enzyme seen by electrophoresis and isoelectric focusing in polyacrylamide gels. The isoelectric points for the different forms of GAH were in the range of 4.65–4.85. Amino acid analyses showed cysteine to be the minimum amino acid and gave a calculated molecular weight for GAH of 53,016 when the assumption that there were four cysteines per subunit was made. Guanine, 8-azaguanine, and 6-thioguanine served as substrates for the enzyme but 3-deazaguanine, a potent competitive inhibitor of GAH, did not. Fluoride ion inhibited the enzyme in a noncompetitive manner, and this inhibition decreased as pH increased. Variation of the kinetic parameters with pH suggested that hydroxide ion might be the second substrate and that a functional group on the enzyme with a pK_a near 5.6 was involved in the reaction. The enzyme was inactivated by treatment with p-hydroxymercurobenzoate and by photooxidation in the presence of rose bengal. Two plausible mechanisms are proposed for the reaction catalyzed by GAH.     

Characterization of bovine liver guanine aminohydrolase

• 1.1. The isoelectric points of bovine liver guanine aminohydrolase and xanthine oxidase are 4.90 and 6.25, respectively.
• 2.2. The molecular weight of the guanine aminohydrolase is 95,000.
• 3.3. The guanine aminohydrolase is formed from two subunits of identical molecular weight.

     

Purification of rabbit liver guanine aminohydrolase.

Rabbit liver guanine aminohydrolase has been purified 1250-fold by utilization of an affinity chromatographic separation on 9-(p-aminoethoxyphenyl) guanine-Sepharose with 50% recovery of activity. Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis of the purified preparations revealed several protein bans which corresponded to regions of enzyme activity measured on gels which had been run under the same conditons. Gel concentration studies of the protein migration rate showed that the protein bans differed in molecular size. The minimum molecular weight was 100,000 from gel permeation chromatography studies. The pH optimum was near pH 8 and the Km, with guanine as substrate was 5.6 x 10-6 M. The latter values are in close agreement with partially purified preparations described in the literature.     

Partial purification and characterization of guanine aminohydrolase fromtrypanosoma cruzi

Guanine deaminase (guanine aminohydrolase, EC 3.5.4.3) catalyzes the hydrolytic deamination of guanine to xanthine. A rapid procedure for the partial purification of guanine deaminase fromTrypanosoma cruzi using granulated bed electrofocusing was developed. Supernatants of cell sonicates (40,000 g) were subjected to electrofocusing with a broad range ampholyte (pH 4–9). Sections of the gel were eluted and assayed for xanthine production. Active fractions were pooled, concentrated, and again subjected to electrofocusing with a pH 5–7 range ampholyte. This procedure resulted in over 240-fold purification. The compounds 4-amino-5-imidazolecarboxamide andN ⁶-methyladenine were found to be potent competitive inhibitors of the enzyme. Their respective K_i values were 3.5×10^–6 M and 9.5×10^–6 M. Irreversible inactivation of the enzyme was observed upon incubation withp-chloromercurophenylsulfonic acid andN-ethyl-maleamide at 5.0×10^–4 M. The enzyme was labile to heat; a substantial loss of activity occurred upon incubation at 55°C for 5 min. A broad pH range of activity (pH 7.5–8.5) was observed in Tris, citrate, and phosphate buffers.     

Molecular forms of guanine aminohydrolase (author's transl)

Guanine aminohydrolase (E.C. 3.5.4.3) has been purified 11-fold from the supernatant fraction of guinea-pig liver homogenates in 0.25 M sucrose (centrifuged at 50,000 X g) through thermic denaturation at 60 degrees C and ammonium sulphate fractionation (30--60% saturation). The enzyme in the homogenates and purified preparations exhibited two Km values. In both preparations four enzymatic electrophoretic bands have been detected. Purified guanine aminohydrolase is chromatographically resolved on DEAE-sephadex in three components whose active forms appeared separately on their pherograms. The enzymatic form eluted at lower ionic strength has the least anodic mobility, is inhibited by guanine (4 X 10(-5) M) and presents only one Km value (1.5 X 10(-5) M). The enzymatic form eluted at greater ionic strength exhibits the highest anodic mobility, is also inhibited by guanine (7 X 10(-5) M) and its Km value seems to be 6.3 X 10(-6) M. Molecular weight of enzymatics forms determined by Sephadex G-200 chromatography, is 120,000 +/- 5,000. The preceding results, correlated with the chromatographic homogeneity of guanine aminohydrolase, purified in Sephadex G-100, suggests that the four molecular forms of the native enzyme may be considered as isozymes.     

Continuous pH stat assay technique for glutamine and asparagine synthetase enzyme systems, involving ATP conversion to ADP plus Pi and AMP plus PPi, respectively

Glutamine synthetase and asparagine synthetase systems with reactions involving lysis of ATP to ADP and P_i or AMP and PP_i are usually assayed by discontinuous sampling and analysis or by coupled enzymic systems. Experimental results confirm theoretical predictions that such reactions may be continuously and directly monitored by pH stat devices. Sample volumes of 0.5–1.0 ml and buret volumes of 0.05–0.25 ml, with ATP levels near 1 mm can be used routinely. The number of enzyme reactions involving ATP to which this technique can be applied is quite large.     

pH induced changes in optical activity of guanine nucleosides

Optical rotatory dispersion and circular dichroism have been used to investigate the protonation of guanosine and some of its analogues. An inversion of the principal Cotton effect and the dichroic band is observed below the acid pK. It is suggested that a conformational change from the anti form above the pK to the syn form below the pK occurs. The reasons why this change should occur only in guanosine and not in adenosine are discussed.     

A sliced gel assay for some enzymes which utilize guanine as substrate

A rapid, reasonably sensitive method is described for the location of guanine aminohydrolase and IMP-GMP: pyrophosphate phosphoribosyl-transferase after separation on analytical polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. The method involves slicing of the gel and is based on the disappearance of guanine as measured by loss of fluorescence at 345 nm when excited at 285 nm in basic solution.     

Adenosine aminohydrolase inhibition in cosolvent--buffer mixtures

Adenosine aminohydrolase from calf intestinal mucosa is sensitive to changes in the cooperative water structure of its environment as induced by the cosolvent dioxane. When dioxane is added to lower the dielectric constant from that of 78 of neat water to about 74, V is approximately halved, competitive inhibition by N⁶-(Δ²-isopentenyl)adenosine is virtually abolished, and competitive inhibition by the product of the reaction, i.e., inosine, is significantly decreased (K_i changes from 0.2 to 0.5 mm inosine). Yet K_m remains unaltered at 40 μm adenosine even to a dielectric constant of 66.Since both N⁶-(Δ²-isopentenyl)adenosine and inosine are competitive inhibitors, they cannot be bound by the enzyme at the same time as adenosine. The fact that substrate binding remains unaltered at dielectric constants where these inhibitors are impotent indicates that binding of these inhibitors by portions of the enzyme not directly involved in substrate binding is important. The degree of alteration of binding with increasing dioxane concentration is different for these two inhibitors, with appreciable inosine binding at mole fractions dioxane where N⁶-(Δ²-isopentenyl)-adenosine binding cannot be demonstrated. Because of this differential effect of dioxane on inosine and N⁶-(Δ²-isopentenyl)adenosine binding, it is apparent that two substances can be competitive inhibitors kinetically and yet be bound differently by an enzyme. Cosolvents may thus be useful probes for the study of enzyme inhibitor interactions. It is proposed that studies of cosolvent effects on enzyme catalysis and substrate and inhibitor binding are capable of revealing the sensitivities of these various sites to alterations in the dielectric constant of the medium and thus may be considered as models for enzyme behavior near cytoplasmic membranes in vivo.     

A high-throughput pH indicator assay for screening glycosyltransferase saturation mutagenesis libraries

Protein engineering using directed evolution or saturation mutagenesis at hot spots is often used to improve enzyme properties such as their substrate selectivity or stability. This requires access to robust high-throughput assays to facilitate the analysis of enzyme libraries. However, relatively few studies on directed evolution or saturation mutagenesis of glycosyltransferases have been reported in part due to a lack of suitable screening methods. In the present study we report a general screening assay for glycosyltransferases that has been developed using the blood group α-(1→3)-galactosyltransferase (GTB) as a model. GTB utilizes UDP-Gal as a donor substrate and α-L-Fucp-(1→2)-β-D-Galp-O-R (H antigen) as an acceptor substrate and synthesizes the blood group B antigen α-D-Galp-(1→3)-[α-L-Fucp-(1→2)]-β-D-Galp-O-R. A closely related α-(1→3)-N-acetylgalactosaminyltransferase (GTA) uses UDP-GalNAc as a donor with the same H acceptor, yielding the A antigen α-D-Galp-NAc-(1→3)-[α-L-Fuc(1→2)]-β-D-Gal-O-R. GTA and GTB are highly homologous enzymes differing in only 4 of 354 amino acids, Arg/Gly-176, Gly/Ser-235, Leu/Met-266, and Gly/Ala-268. The screening assay is based on the color change of the pH indicator bromothymol blue when a proton is released during the transfer of Gal/GalNAc from UDP-Gal/UDP-GalNAc to the acceptor substrate. Saturation mutagenesis of GTB enzyme at M214, a hot spot adjacent to the ²¹¹DVD²¹³ metal binding motif, was performed and the resulting library was screened for increases in UDP-GalNAc transfer activity. Two novel mutants, M214G and M214S, identified by pH indicator screening, were purified and kinetically characterized. M214S and M214G both exhibited two-fold higher k_cat and specific activity than wild-type GTB for UDP-GalNAc. The results confirm the importance of residue M214 for donor enzyme specificity.     

The pH dependence of spectral parameters for Kalckar's adenosine deaminase assay

Optimal monitor wavelengths and differential millimolar extinction coefficients (m delta epsilon) for rate determination of reactions catalyzed by adenosine deaminases on several substrates have been investigated as a function of pH in the range from 6.5 to 12. The values found are in some cases at variance with those quoted in the biochemical literature. The effect of pH on m delta epsilon values is shown to be clearly related to acid-base properties of product and/or substrate in the reaction. Experimental data are in most cases used to derive analytical functions describing the pH dependence of m delta epsilon. For the conversion of adenosine to inosine at pH 6.5, the following values of m delta epsilon +/- SE were obtained: at 263 nm, 8.27 +/- 0.02; at 264 nm, 8.36 +/- 0.02; at 265 nm, 8.27 +/- 0.03. These represent absolute maximal values as a function of pH.