Improved understanding of the interactions and complexities of biological nitrogen and phosphorus removal processes

Nitrogen and phosphorus removal from wastewater is now considered essential for the protection of our waterways. Biological nutrient removal processes are generally the most efficient and cost-effective solution to achieve this. While the principles of these processes are well known, intriguing and useful details are being discovered with the recent advances in bio-process engineering and microbial sciences. Phosphorus accumulating organisms have only been identified in recent years, and there are now competing glycogen accumulating organisms being found in biological phosphorus removal systems. These can possibly explain the reasons for the variable phosphorus removal performance of certain systems, and their control can help in the development of more stable and better performing processes. Detailed investigations of the traditional nitrification-denitrification systems, but also of novel developments for nitrogen removal, reveal a more complex and diverse range of processes involved in these transformations. Increasingly, linked phosphorus and nitrogen removal processes are being developed, creating further opportunities to optimise the technologies. However, this might also bring certain risks such as the potential to produce the greenhouse-gas nitrous oxide (N₂O) rather than nitrogen gas as the final denitrification product. A range of recent developments in these areas is covered in this paper.     

Assessment of a bioaugmentation strategy with polyphosphate accumulating organisms in a nitrification/denitrification sequencing batch reactor

Different alternative configurations and strategies for the simultaneous biological removal of organic matter and nutrients (N and P) in wastewater have been proposed in the literature. This work demonstrates a new successful strategy to bring in enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) to a conventional nitrification/denitrification system by means of bioaugmentation with an enriched culture of phosphorus accumulating organisms (PAO). This strategy was tested in a sequencing batch reactor (SBR), where an 8 h configuration with 3 h anoxic, 4.5 h aerobic and 25 min of settling confirmed that nitrification, denitrification and PAO activity could be maintained for a minimum of 60 days of operation after the bioaugmentation step. The successful bioaugmentation strategy opens new possibilities for retrofitting full-scale WWTP originally designed for only nitrification/denitrification. These systems could remove P simultaneously to COD and N if they were bioaugmented with waste purge of an anaerobic/aerobic SBR operated in parallel treating part of the influent wastewater.     

An innovative membrane bioreactor (MBR) system for simultaneous nitrogen and phosphorus removal

Membrane filtration was integrated with a post-denitrification process to form an innovative membrane bioreactor (MBR) system for effective organic degradation and nutrient (N and P) removal. The system comprised of an aerobic tank, an anoxic tank, an intermediate sedimentation tank, and a membrane filtration tank. The sedimentation tank functioned not only as a rough settler for sludge–water separation before membrane filtration but also as an anaerobic chamber for P release. While half of the influent flowed into the aerobic tank, the other half was fed into the anoxic tank to favor the proliferation of phosphorus accumulating organisms (PAOs). The experiment was conducted continuously for about 430 days. With a short overall treatment time of less than 10 h for municipal wastewater, the MBR-based process could achieve the total organic carbon, total nitrogen, and total phosphorus removals of around 94%, 85%, and 87%, respectively. The growth and activity of PAOs in the MBR system were evidenced by the significant P release in the anaerobic chamber followed by the luxury P uptake in the membrane tank. With the DAPI and PAO_mix probe staining, the increases of PAOs and polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) in sludge during the experiment were well observed under the fluorescent microscope.     

Effect of nitrite from nitritation on biological phosphorus removal in a sequencing batch reactor treating domestic wastewater

Although nitrite effect on enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) has been previously studied, very limited research has been undertaken about the effect of nitrite accumulation caused by nitritation on EBPR. This paper focused on nitrite effect from nitritation on EBPR in a sequencing batch reactor treating domestic wastewater. Results showed that nitrite of below 10 mg/L did not inhibit P-uptake and release; whereas EBPR deterioration was observed when nitrite accumulation reached 20 mg/L. Due to P-uptake prior to nitritation, nitrite of 20 mg/L has no effect on aerobic P-uptake. The main reason leading to EBPR deterioration was the competition of carbon source. Batch tests were conducted to investigate nitrite effect on anaerobic P-release. Under sufficient carbon source, nitrite of 30 mg/L had no impact on poly-β-hydroxyalkanoate (PHA) storage; contrarily, under insufficient carbon source, denitrifiers competing for carbon source with phosphorus accumulating organisms resulted in decrease of PHA synthesis and P-release.     

Uranyl precipitation by biomass from an enhanced biological phosphorus removal reactor

Heavy metal and radionuclide contamination presents a significant environmental problem worldwide. Precipitation of heavy metals on membranes of cells that secrete phosphate has been shown to be an effective method of reducing the volume of these wastes, thus reducing the cost of disposal. A consortium of organisms, some of which secrete large quantities of phosphate, was enriched in a laboratory-scale sequencing batch reactor performing Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal, a treatment process widely used for removing phosphorus. Organisms collected after the aerobic phase of this process secreted phosphate and precipitated greater than 98% of the uranyl from a 1.5 mM uranyl nitrate solution when supplemented with an organic acid as a carbon source under anaerobic conditions. Transmission electron microscopy, energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy, and fluorescence spectroscopy were used to identify the precipitate as membrane-associated uranyl phosphate, UO₂HPO₄.     

Effect of different carbon sources on the enhanced biological phosphorus removal in a sequencing batch reactor

The effect of the different carbon sources acetate, acetate/glucose or glucose on the enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) process was studied by experiments under alternating anaerobic–aerobic conditions in one sequencing batch reactor for each carbon source. The glucose was consumed completely within the first 30 min of the anaerobic phase whereas acetate degradation was slow and incomplete. Phosphate was released independently of the carbon source during the whole anaerobic phase. The highest phosphate release (27 mg P l⁻¹) and polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) storage (20 mg C g⁻¹ dry matter (DM)) during the anaerobic phase as well as the highest polyphosphate (poly-P) (8 mg P g⁻¹ DM) and glycogen storage (17 mg C g⁻¹ DM) during the aerobic phase were observed with acetate. In contrast to other investigations, glycogen storage did not increase with glucose as substrate but was significantly smaller than with acetate. The PHA composition was also influenced strongly by the carbon source. The polyhydroxyvalerate (PHV) portion of the PHA was maximal 17% for acetate and 82% for glucose. Due to the strong influence of the carbon source on the PHA concentration and composition, PHA storage seems to regulate mainly the phosphate release and uptake. This revised version was published online in July 2006 with corrections to the Cover Date.     

Which are the polyphosphate accumulating organisms in full-scale activated sludge enhanced biological phosphate removal systems in Australia?

AIMS: To see if the compositions of the microbial communities in full scale enhanced biological phosphorus removal activated sludge systems were the same as those from laboratory scale sequencing batch reactors fed a synthetic sewage. METHODS: Biomass samples taken from nine full scale enhanced biological phosphate removal (EBPR) activated sludge plants in the eastern states of Australia were analysed for their populations of polyphosphate (polyP)-accumulating organisms (PAO) using semi-quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in combination with DAPI (4'-6-diamidino-2-phenylindole) staining for polyP. RESULTS: Very few betaproteobacterial Rhodocyclus related organisms could be detected by FISH in most of the plants examined, and even where present, not all these cells even within a single cluster, stained positively for polyP with DAPI. In some plants in samples from aerobic reactors the Actinobacteria dominated populations containing polyP. CONCLUSIONS: The PAO populations in full-scale EBPR systems often differ to those seen in laboratory scale reactors fed artificial sewage, and Rhodocyclus related organisms, dominating these latter communities may not be as important in full-scale systems. Instead Actinobacteria may be the major PAO. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: These findings illustrate how little is still known about the microbial ecology of EBPR processes and that more emphasis should now be placed on analysis of full-scale plants if microbiological methods are to be applied to monitoring their performances.     

The microbiology of biological phosphorus removal in activated sludge systems

Activated sludge systems are designed and operated globally to remove phosphorus microbiologically, a process called enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR). Yet little is still known about the ecology of EBPR processes, the microbes involved, their functions there and the possible reasons why they often perform unreliably. The application of rRNA-based methods to analyze EBPR community structure has changed dramatically our understanding of the microbial populations responsible for EBPR, but many substantial gaps in our knowledge of the population dynamics of EBPR and its underlying mechanisms remain. This review critically examines what we once thought we knew about the microbial ecology of EBPR, what we think we now know, and what still needs to be elucidated before these processes can be operated and controlled more reliably than is currently possible. It looks at the history of EBPR, the currently available biochemical models, the structure of the microbial communities found in EBPR systems, possible identities of the bacteria responsible, and the evidence why these systems might operate suboptimally. The review stresses the need to extend what have been predominantly laboratory-based studies to full-scale operating plants. It aims to encourage microbiologists and process engineers to collaborate more closely and to bring an interdisciplinary approach to bear on this complex ecosystem.