Vertebrate Morphology: Tale of a Phoenix

The last 25 years have seen a renaissance in the use of structuralprinciples in biological study. Analytical methods have beenrefined and new concepts introduced. Systematic applicationshave imposed new demands because cladistic methods have emphasizedthe need for correct interpretations of individual characters.Developmental approaches now permit association of characters;however, newly described genetic mechanisms may pose questionsabout structural criteria forhomology. Structural charactersprove significant, both in evaluation of the possible rolesof morphological characteristics and in establishing the realityand level of adaptation. Morphology, ever more, is an area ofactive researches promising significant results.     

The Vertebrate Body Axis: Evolution and Mechanical Function

The body axis of vertebrates is an integrated cylinder of bones,connective tissue, and muscle. These structures vary among livingand extinct vertebrates in their orientation, composition, andfunction in ways that render useless simplistic models of theselective pressures that may have driven the evolution of theaxis. Instead, recent experimental work indicates that the vertebrateaxis serves multiple mechanical functions simultaneously: bendingthe body, storing elastic energy, transmitting forces from limbs,and ventilating the lungs. On the biochemical level, researchon human intervertebral discs has shown that collagens resisttension and torsion while proteoglycans bind water to resistcompression. This molecular behavior predicts mechanical behaviorof the entire joint, which, in turn helps determine the mechanicalbehavior of the vertebral column. The axial skeleton, in turn,is reconfigured by axial muscles that work by way of three-dimensionalconnective tissues that derive mechanical advantage for themuscle force by using the skin to increase leverage. Modelsmay eventually help determine which evolutionary changes inthe vertebrate body axis have had important functional and possiblyadaptational consequences. Current reconstruction of the hypotheticalstem lineage of early chordates and vertebrates suggests thatthe gradual mineralization of the vertebral elements, appearanceof fin rays and new median fins, and transverse and then horizontalsegmentation of the axial musculature are all features correlatedwith increases in swimming speed, maneuverability, and bodysize.     

Evolution of Vertebrate Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenases

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) and tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase (TDO) are tryptophan-degrading enzymes that catalyze the same reaction, the first step in tryptophan catabolism via the kynurenine pathway. TDO is widely distributed among life-forms, being found not only in eukaryotes but also in bacteria. In contrast, IDO has been found only in mammals and yeast to date. However, recent genome and EST projects have identified IDO homologues in non-mammals and found an IDO paralogue that is expressed in mice. In this study, we cloned the frog and fish IDO homologues and the mouse IDO paralogue, and characterized their enzymatic properties using recombinants. The IDOs of lower vertebrates and the mouse IDO paralogue had IDO activity but had 500–1000 times higher K _m values and very low enzyme efficiency compared with mammalian IDOs. It appears that L-Trp is not a true substrate for these enzymes in vivo, although their actual function is unknown. On the phylogenetic tree, these low-activity IDOs, which we have named “proto-IDOs,” formed a cluster that was distinct from the mammalian IDO cluster. The IDO and proto-IDO genes are present tandemly on the chromosomes of mammals, including the marsupial opossum, whereas only the proto-IDO gene is observed in chicken and fish genomes. These results suggest that (mammalian) IDOs arose from proto-IDOs by gene duplication that occurred before the divergence of marsupial and eutherian (placental) mammals in mammalian evolutionary history.     

The Origin and Evolution of Vertebrate Glycine Transporters

In the vertebrate central nervous system, glycinergic neurotransmission is regulated by the action of the glycine transporters 1 and 2 (GlyT1 and GlyT2)—members of the solute carrier family 6 (SLC6). Several invertebrate deuterostomes have two paralogous glycine carrier genes, with one gene in the pair having greater sequence identity and higher alignment scores with respect to GlyT1 and the other paralog showing greater similarity to GlyT2. In phylogenetic trees, GlyT2-like sequences from invertebrate deuterostomes form a monophyletic subclade with vertebrate GlyT2, while invertebrate GlyT1-like proteins constitute an outgroup to both the GlyT2-like proteins and to vertebrate GlyT1 sequences. These results are consistent with the hypothesis that vertebrate GlyT1 and GlyT2 are, respectively, derived from GlyT1- and GlyT2-like genes in invertebrate deuterostomes. This implies that the gene duplication which gave rise to these paralogs occurred prior to the origin of vertebrates. GlyT2 subsequently diverged significantly from its invertebrate orthologs (i.e., through the acquisition of a unique N-terminus) as a consequence of functional specialization, being expressed principally in the lower CNS; while GlyT1 has activity in both the lower CNS and several regions of the forebrain.     

Activity Physiology and Evolution of the Vertebrate Skeleton

SYNOPSIS. Vertebrates frequently rely on intramuscular glycolysisas the major source of ATP utilized during bouts of intenseexercise. This is often followed by extended periods of markedsystemic pH fluctuation. Such a pattern of activity physiologyis unique among the Metazoa and probably dates back to the veryearliest vertebrates. The origin of bone may have been necessitated by requirementfor a skeletal matrix with chemical stability over the broadrange of tissue pH associated with vertebrate exercise physiology.     

Developmental Data and Phylogenetic Systematics: Evolution of the Vertebrate Limb

Among the primary contributions of phylogenetic systematicsto the synthesis of developmental biology and evolution arephylogenetic hypotheses. Phylogenetic hypotheses are criticalin interpreting the patterns of evolution of developmental genesand processes, as are morphological data. Using a robust phylogeny,the evolutionary history of individual morphological or developmentalfeatures can be traced and ancestral conditions inferred. Multiplecharacters (e.g., morphological and developmental) can be mappedtogether on the phylogeny, and patterns of character associationcan be quantified and tested for correlation. Using the vertebrate forelimb as an example, I show that bymapping accurate morphological data (homologous skeletal elementsof the vertebrate forelimb) onto a phylogeny, an alternativeinterpretation of Hox gene expression emerges. Teleost fishesand tetrapods may share no homologous skeletal elements in theirforelimbs, and thus similarities and differences in Hox patternsduring limb development must be reinterpreted. Specifically,the presence of the phase III Hox pattern in tetrapods may notbe correlated with digits but rather may simply be the normalexpression pattern of a metapterygium in fishes. This exampleillustrates the rigorous hypotheses that can be developed usingmorphological data and phylogenetic methods. "Creating a general reference system and investigating the relationsthat extend from it to all other possible and necessary systemsin biology is the task of systematics." (Hennig, 1966, p.7)     

Evolution of the Vertebrate Central Nervous System: Patterns and Processes

AS brains do not fossilize, most proposed phylogenetic sequencesfor central nervous system characters must be based on the patternsof variation of those characters in living organisms. Similarly,hypotheses regarding how brains change through time, and theevolutionary processes that produce these changes, are ultimatelybased on the character patterns recognized. It is critical inthese analyses to distinguish between homologous and homoplasouscharacters if errors in the reconstruction and interpretationof phylogenies are to be minimized. Definitions of homologyand homoplasy are reviewed, as are the concepts that bear ontheir application. Cladistic definitions are adopted, and criteriafor distinguishing homologous from homoplasous characters arediscussed. Analysis of a number of CNS characters that are usuallyassumed to be homologous reveals that homoplasous charactersappear among them. As in other organ systems, homoplasous charactersare actually common. A number of previous hypotheses regardingCNS evolution are reviewed in the context of new data on neuralconnections and their cladistic analysis. Some of these hypothesesmay be falsified by a cladistic treatment of CNS characters,whereas sufficient data do not exist to evaluate others.     

Evolution of The Vertebrate Pineal Gland: The Aanat Hypothesis

The defining feature of the pineal gland is the capacity to function as a melatonin factory that operates on a ∼24 h schedule, reflecting the unique synthetic capacities of the pinealocyte. Melatonin synthesis is typically elevated at night and serves to provide the organism with a signal of nighttime. Melatonin levels can be viewed as hands of the clock. Issues relating to the evolutionary events leading up to the immergence of this system have not received significant attention. When did melatonin synthesis appear in the evolutionary line leading to vertebrates? When did a distinct pineal gland first appear? What were the forces driving this evolutionary trend? As more knowledge has grown about the pinealocyte and the relationship it has to retinal photoreceptors, it has become possible to generate a plausible hypothesis to explain how the pineal gland and the melatonin rhythm evolved. At the heart of the hypothesis is the melatonin rhythm enzyme arylalkylamine N-acetyltransferase (AANAT). The advances supporting the hypothesis will be reviewed here and expanded beyond the original foundation; the hypothesis and its implications will be addressed.     

Molecular Evolution of Vertebrate Goose-Type Lysozyme Genes

We have found that mammalian genomes contain two lysozyme g genes. To better understand the function of the lysozyme g genes we have examined the evolution of this small gene family. The lysozyme g gene structure has been largely conserved during vertebrate evolution, except at the 5' end of the gene, which varies in number of exons. The expression pattern of the lysozyme g gene varies between species. The fish lysozyme g sequences, unlike bird and mammalian lysozyme g sequences, do not predict a signal peptide, suggesting that the encoded proteins are not secreted. The fish sequences also do not conserve cysteine residues that generate disulfide bridges in the secreted bird enzymes, supporting the hypothesis that the fish enzymes have an intracellular function. The signal peptide found in bird and mammalian lysozyme g genes may have been acquired as an exon in the ancestor of birds and mammals, or, alternatively, an exon encoding the signal peptide has been lost in fish. Both explanations account for the change in gene structure between fish and tetrapods. The mammalian lysozyme g sequences were found to have evolved at an accelerated rate, and to have not perfectly conserved the known active site catalytic triad of the bird enzymes. This observation suggests that the mammalian enzymes may have altered their biological function, as well.     

The Molecular Evolution of the Vertebrate Trypsinogens

We expand the already large number of known trypsinogen nucleotide and amino acid sequences by presenting additional trypsinogen sequences from the tunicate (Boltenia villosa), the lamprey (Petromyzon marinus), the pufferfish (Fugu rubripes), and the frog (Xenopus laevis). The current array of known trypsinogen sequences now spans the entire vertebrate phylogeny. Phylogenetic analysis is made difficult by the presence of multiple isozymes within species and rates of evolution that vary highly between both species and isozymes. We nevertheless present a Fitch-Margoliash phylogeny constructed from pairwise distances. We employ this phylogeny as a vehicle for speculation on the evolution of the trypsinogen gene family as well as the general modes of evolution of multigene families. Unique attributes of the lamprey and tunicate trypsinogens are noted. Received: 12 July 1997     

Gene Duplications and Evolution of Vertebrate Voltage-Gated Sodium Channels

Voltage-gated sodium channels underlie action potential generation in excitable tissue. To establish the evolutionary mechanisms that shaped the vertebrate sodium channel α-subunit (SCNA) gene family and their encoded Na_v1 proteins, we identified all SCNA genes in several teleost species. Molecular cloning revealed that teleosts have eight SCNA genes, compared to ten in another vertebrate lineage, mammals. Prior phylogenetic analyses have indicated that the genomes of both teleosts and tetrapods contain four monophyletic groups of SCNA genes, and that tandem duplications expanded the number of genes in two of the four mammalian groups. However, the number of genes in each group varies between teleosts and tetrapods, suggesting different evolutionary histories in the two vertebrate lineages. Our findings from phylogenetic analysis and chromosomal mapping of Danio rerio genes indicate that tandem duplications are an unlikely mechanism for generation of the extant teleost SCNA genes. Instead, analyses of other closely mapped genes in D. rerio as well as of SCNA genes from several teleost species all support the hypothesis that a whole-genome duplication was involved in expansion of the SCNA gene family in teleosts. Interestingly, despite their different evolutionary histories, mRNA analyses demonstrated a conservation of expression patterns for SCNA orthologues in teleosts and tetrapods, suggesting functional conservation. Electronic Supplementary Material Electronic Supplementary material is available for this article at and accessible for authorised users. [Reviewing Editor: Dr. Axel Meyer]     

Development of Vertebrate Skeletal Muscle

An investigation of developing skeletal muscle necessitatesthe study of three categories; the derivation of muscle cellsor fibers, myofilament synthesis and interactions, assemblyof myofilaments into functional sarcomeres of striated myofibrils.With few exceptions, skeletal muscle cells are of mesodermalorigin, and consist of rounded mononucleated cells which elongateand fuse with one another to become myotubes. Within the sarcoplasm,myofibrillar proteins are synthesized and grouped into interactingthick and thin filaments. Crude, non-striated myofibrils resultfrom linear arrangements of thick and thin filaments which arehorizontally aligned by the invaginating sarcotubular system.After Z-lines form, providing attachment sites for thin filaments,a typical banding pattern follows. The newly formed Z-linespull apart, followed by the attached thin filaments, and repeating"relaxed" sarcomeres are the resulting striated myofibrillarpattern.