Interaction of microbial pathogens with host exocytic pathways

Many microbial pathogens co‐opt or perturb host membrane trafficking pathways. This review covers recent examples in which microbes interact with host exocytosis, the fusion of intracellular vesicles with the plasma membrane. The bacterial pathogens Listeria monocytogenes and Staphylococcus aureus subvert recycling endosomal pathways of exocytosis in order to induce their entry into human cells. By contrast, entry of the protozoan pathogen Trypanosoma cruzi or the virus adenovirus into host cells involves exploitation of lysosomal exocytosis. Toxins produced by Bacillus anthracis or Vibrio cholerae interfere with exocytosis pathways mediated by the GTPase Rab11 and the exocyst complex. By doing so, anthrax or cholera toxins impair recycling of cadherins to cell–cell junctions and disrupt the barrier properties of endothelial cells or intestinal epithelial cells, respectively. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) is expelled from bladder epithelial cells through two different exocytic routes that involve sensing of bacteria in vacuoles by host Toll‐like receptor 4 (TLR4) or monitoring of the pH of lysosomes harbouring UPEC. The TLR4 pathway is mediated by multiple Rab GTPases and the exocyst, whereas the other pathway involves exocytosis of lysosomes. Expulsion of UPEC through these pathways is thought to benefit the host.     

Endoplasmic reticulum chaperone Gp96 controls actomyosin dynamics and protects against pore‐forming toxins

During infection, plasma membrane (PM) blebs protect host cells against bacterial pore‐forming toxins (PFTs), but were also proposed to promote pathogen dissemination. However, the details and impact of blebbing regulation during infection remained unclear. Here, we identify the endoplasmic reticulum chaperone Gp96 as a novel regulator of PFT‐induced blebbing. Gp96 interacts with non‐muscle myosin heavy chain IIA (NMHCIIA) and controls its activity and remodelling, which is required for appropriate coordination of bleb formation and retraction. This mechanism involves NMHCIIA–Gp96 interaction and their recruitment to PM blebs and strongly resembles retraction of uropod‐like structures from polarized migrating cells, a process that also promotes NMHCIIA–Gp96 association. Consistently, Gp96 and NMHCIIA not only protect the PM integrity from listeriolysin O (LLO) during infection by Listeria monocytogenes but also affect cytoskeletal organization and cell migration. Finally, we validate the association between Gp96 and NMHCIIA in vivo and show that Gp96 is required to protect hosts from LLO‐dependent killing.     

Vying for the control of inflammasomes: The cytosolic frontier of enteric bacterial pathogen–host interactions

Enteric pathogen–host interactions occur at multiple interfaces, including the intestinal epithelium and deeper organs of the immune system. Microbial ligands and activities are detected by host sensors that elicit a range of immune responses. Membrane‐bound toll‐like receptors and cytosolic inflammasome pathways are key signal transducers that trigger the production of pro‐inflammatory molecules, such as cytokines and chemokines, and regulate cell death in response to infection. In recent years, the inflammasomes have emerged as a key frontier in the tussle between bacterial pathogens and the host. Inflammasomes are complexes that activate caspase‐1 and are regulated by related caspases, such as caspase‐11, ‐4, ‐5 and ‐8. Importantly, enteric bacterial pathogens can actively engage or evade inflammasome signalling systems. Extracellular, vacuolar and cytosolic bacteria have developed divergent strategies to subvert inflammasomes. While some pathogens take advantage of inflammasome activation (e.g. Listeria monocytogenes, Helicobacter pylori), others (e.g. E. coli, Salmonella, Shigella, Yersinia sp.) deploy a range of virulence factors, mainly type 3 secretion system effectors, that subvert or inhibit inflammasomes. In this review we focus on inflammasome pathways and their immune functions, and discuss how enteric bacterial pathogens interact with them. These studies have not only shed light on inflammasome‐mediated immunity, but also the exciting area of mammalian cytosolic immune surveillance.     

Integrity under stress: Host membrane remodelling and damage by fungal pathogens

Membrane bilayers of eukaryotic cells are an amalgam of lipids and proteins that distinguish organelles and compartmentalise cellular functions. The mammalian cell has evolved mechanisms to sense membrane tension or damage and respond as needed. In the case of the plasma membrane and phagosomal membrane, these bilayers act as a barrier to microorganisms and are a conduit by which the host interacts with pathogens, including fungi such as Candida, Cryptococcus, Aspergillus, or Histoplasma species. Due to their size, morphological flexibility, ability to produce long filaments, secrete pathogenicity factors, and their potential to replicate within the phagosome, fungi can assault host membranes in a variety of physical and biochemical ways. In addition, the recent discovery of a fungal pore‐forming peptide toxin further highlights the importance of membrane biology in the outcomes between host and fungal cells. In this review, we discuss the apparent “stretching” of membranes as a sophisticated biological response and the role of vesicular transport in combating membrane stress and damage. We also review the known pathogenicity factors and physical properties of fungal pathogens in the context of host membranes and discuss how this may contribute to pathogenic interactions between fungal and host cells.     

Listeria monocytogenes ActA is a key player in evading autophagic recognition

Autophagy is a pivotal bulk degradation system that eliminates undesirable molecules, damaged organelles, and misfolded protein aggregates in response to diverse stimuli, including infection. Autophagy acts to limit intracellular microbial growth but intracellular pathogens have evolved strategies to subvert host autophagic responses for their survival. We found that Listeria monocytogenes ActA, a surface protein required for actin polymerization and actin-based bacterial motility, plays a pivotal role in evading autophagy, but in a manner independent of bacterial motility. We show that L. monocytogenes exploits the biomimetic property of ActA to camouflage itself with host proteins comprised of Ena/VASP and the Arp2/3 complex, thereby escaping recognition by autophagy (Fig. 1).     

Avoiding death by autophagy: Interactions of Listeria monocytogenes with the macrophage autophagy system

Autophagy restricts the growth of a variety of intracellular pathogens. However, cytosol-adapted pathogens have evolved ways to evade restriction by this innate immune mechanism. Listeria monocytogenes is a Gram-positive bacterial pathogen that utilizes a cholesterol-dependent pore-forming toxin, listeriolysin O (LLO), to escape from the phagosome. Autophagy targets L. monocytogenes in LLO-damaged phagosomes and also in the cytosol under some experimental conditions. However, this bacterium has evolved multiple mechanisms to evade restriction by autophagy, including actin-based motility in the cytosol and an as yet undefined mechanism mediated by bacterial phospholipases C’s (PLCs). A population of L. monocytogenes with inefficient LLO activity forms Spacious Listeria-containing Phagosomes (SLAPs), which are autophagosome-like compartments that do not mature, allowing slow bacterial growth within enlarged vesicles. SLAPs may represent a stalemate between bacterial LLO action and the host autophagy system, resulting in persistent infection.

Addendum to: Birmingham CL, Canadien V, Gouin E, Troy EB, Yoshimori T, Cossart P, Higgins DE, Brumell JH. Listeria monocytogenes evades killing by autophagy during colonization of host cells. Autophagy 2007; 3:442-51.andBirmingham CL, Canadien V, Kaniuk NA, Steinberg BE, Higgins DE, Brumell JH. Listeriolysin O allows Listeria monocytogenes replication in macrophage vacuoles. Nature 2008; 451:350-4.     

The RAB5‐GEF Function of RIN1 Regulates Multiple Steps During Listeria monocytogenes Infection

Listeria monocytogenes is a food‐borne pathogenic bacterium that invades intestinal epithelial cells through a phagocytic pathway that relies on the activation of host cell RAB5 GTPases. Listeria monocytogenes must subsequently inhibit RAB5, however, in order to escape lysosome‐mediated destruction. Relatively little is known about upstream RAB5 regulators during L. monocytogenes entry and phagosome escape processes in epithelial cells. Here we identify RIN1, a RAS effector and RAB5‐directed guanine nucleotide exchange factor (GEF), as a host cell factor in L. monocytogenes infection. RIN1 is rapidly engaged following L. monocytogenes infection and is required for efficient invasion of intestinal epithelial cells. RIN1‐mediated RAB5 activation later facilitates the fusion of phagosomes with lysosomes, promoting clearance of bacteria from the host cell. These results suggest that RIN1 is a host cell regulator that performs counterbalancing functions during early and late stages of L. monocytogenes infection, ultimately favoring pathogen clearance.      

The history of septin biology and bacterial infection

Investigation of cytoskeleton during bacterial infection has significantly contributed to both cell and infection biology. Bacterial pathogens Listeria monocytogenes and Shigella flexneri are widely recognised as paradigms for investigation of the cytoskeleton during bacterial entry, actin‐based motility, and cell‐autonomous immunity. At the turn of the century, septins were a poorly understood component of the cytoskeleton mostly studied in the context of yeast cell division and human cancer. In 2002, a screen performed in the laboratory of Pascale Cossart identified septin family member MSF (MLL septin‐like fusion, now called SEPT9) associated with L. monocytogenes entry into human epithelial cells. These findings inspired the investigation of septins during L. monocytogenes and S. flexneri infection at the Institut Pasteur, illuminating important roles for septins in host–microbe interactions. In this review, we revisit the history of septin biology and bacterial infection, and discuss how the comparative study of L. monocytogenes and S. flexneri has been instrumental to understand septin roles in cellular homeostasis and host defence.     

A Common Clathrin‐Mediated Machinery Co‐ordinates Cell–Cell Adhesion and Bacterial Internalization

Invasive bacterial pathogens often target cellular proteins involved in adhesion as a first event during infection. For example, Listeria monocytogenes uses the bacterial protein InlA to interact with E‐cadherin, hijack the host adherens junction (AJ) machinery and invade non‐phagocytic cells by a clathrin‐dependent mechanism. Here, we investigate a potential role for clathrin in cell–cell adhesion. We observed that the initial steps of AJ formation trigger the phosphorylation of clathrin, and its transient localization at forming cell–cell contacts. Furthermore, we show that clathrin serves as a hub for the recruitment of proteins that are necessary for the actin rearrangements that accompany the maturation of AJs. Using an InlA/E‐cadherin chimera, we show that adherent cells expressing the chimera form AJs with cells expressing E‐cadherin. We demonstrate that non‐adherent cells expressing the InlA chimera, as bacteria, can be internalized by E‐cadherin‐expressing adherent cells. Together these results reveal that a common clathrin‐mediated machinery may regulate internalization and cell adhesion and that the relative mobility of one of the interacting partners plays an important role in the commitment to either one of these processes.     

Type I interferon promotes cell‐to‐cell spread of Listeria monocytogenes

Type I interferons (IFNs) play a critical role in antiviral immune responses, but can be deleterious to the host during some bacterial infections. Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) induces a type I IFN response by activating cytosolic antiviral surveillance pathways. This is beneficial to the bacteria as mice lacking the type I IFN receptor (IFNAR1^?/?) are resistant to systemic infection by Lm. The mechanisms by which type I IFNs promote Lm infection are unclear. Here, we show that IFNAR1 is required for dissemination of Lm within infection foci in livers of infected mice and for efficient cell‐to‐cell spread in vitro in macrophages. IFNAR1 promotes ActA polarization and actin‐based motility in the cytosol of host cells. Our studies suggest type I IFNs directly impact the intracellular life cycle of Lm and provide new insight into the mechanisms used by bacterial pathogens to exploit the type I IFN response.     

Histone H3 deacetylation promotes host cell viability for efficient infection by Listeria monocytogenes

For many intracellular bacterial pathogens manipulating host cell survival is essential for maintaining their replicative niche, and is a common strategy used to promote infection. The bacterial pathogen Listeria monocytogenes is well known to hijack host machinery for its own benefit, such as targeting the host histone H3 for modification by SIRT2. However, by what means this modification benefits infection, as well as the molecular players involved, were unknown. Here we show that SIRT2 activity supports Listeria intracellular survival by maintaining genome integrity and host cell viability. This protective effect is dependent on H3K18 deacetylation, which safeguards the host genome by counteracting infection-induced DNA damage. Mechanistically, infection causes SIRT2 to interact with the nucleic acid binding protein TDP-43 and localise to genomic R-loops, where H3K18 deacetylation occurs. This work highlights novel functions of TDP-43 and R-loops during bacterial infection and identifies the mechanism through which L. monocytogenes co-opts SIRT2 to allow efficient infection.     

Temporal and spatial trigger of post‐exponential virulence‐associated regulatory cascades by Legionella pneumophila after bacterial escape into the host cell cytosol

During late stages of infection and prior to lysis of the infected macrophages or amoeba, the Legionella pneumophila‐containing phagosome becomes disrupted, followed by bacterial escape into the host cell cytosol, where the last few rounds of bacterial proliferation occur prior to lysis of the plasma membrane. This coincides with growth transition into the post‐exponential (PE) phase, which is controlled by regulatory cascades including RpoS and the LetA/S two‐component regulator. Whether the temporal expression of flagella by the regulatory cascades at the PE phase is exhibited within the phagosome or after bacterial escape into the host cell cytosol is not known. We have utilized fluorescence microscopy‐based phagosome integrity assay to differentiate between vacuolar and cytosolic bacteria/or bacteria within disrupted phagosomes. Our data show that during late stages of infection, expression of FlaA is triggered after bacterial escape into the macrophage cytosol and the peak of FlaA expression is delayed for few hours after cytosolic residence of the bacteria. Importantly, bacterial escape into the host cell cytosol is independent of flagella, RpoS and the two‐component regulator LetA/S, which are all triggered by L. pneumophila upon growth transition into the PE phase. Disruption of the phagosome and bacterial escape into the cytosol of macrophages is independent of the bacterial pore‐forming activity, and occurs prior to the induction of apoptosis during late stages of infection. We conclude that the temporal and spatial engagement of virulence‐associated regulatory cascades by L. pneumophila at the PE phase is temporally and spatially triggered after phagosomal escape and bacterial residence in the host cell cytosol.     

Exploiting dominant‐negative toxins to combat Staphylococcus aureus pathogenesis

Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a human pathogen that relies on the subversion of host phagocytes to support its pathogenic lifestyle. S. aureus strains can produce up to five beta‐barrel, bi‐component, pore‐forming leukocidins that target and kill host phagocytes. Thus, preventing immune cell killing by these toxins is likely to boost host immunity. Here, we describe the identification of glycine‐rich motifs within the membrane‐penetrating stem domains of the leukocidin subunits that are critical for killing primary human neutrophils. Remarkably, leukocidins lacking these glycine‐rich motifs exhibit dominant‐negative inhibitory effects toward their wild‐type toxin counterparts as well as other leukocidins. Biochemical and cellular assays revealed that these dominant‐negative toxins work by forming mixed complexes that are impaired in pore formation. The dominant‐negative leukocidins inhibited S. aureus cytotoxicity toward primary human neutrophils, protected mice from lethal challenge by wild‐type leukocidin, and reduced bacterial burden in a murine model of bloodstream infection. Thus, we describe the first example of staphylococcal bi‐component dominant‐negative toxins and their potential as novel therapeutics to combat S. aureus infection.     

Drosophila mauve Mutants Reveal a Role of LYST Homologs Late in the Maturation of Phagosomes and Autophagosomes

Chediak–Higashi syndrome (CHS) is a lethal disease caused by mutations that inactivate the lysosomal trafficking regulator protein (LYST). Patients suffer from diverse symptoms including oculocutaneous albinism, recurrent infections, neutropenia and progressive neurodegeneration. These defects have been traced back to over‐sized lysosomes and lysosome‐related organelles (LROs) in different cell types. Here, we explore mutants in the Drosophila mauve gene as a new model system for CHS. The mauve gene (CG42863) encodes a large BEACH domain protein of 3535 amino acids similar to LYST. This reflects a functional homology between these proteins as mauve mutants also display enlarged LROs, such as pigment granules. This Drosophila model also replicates the enhanced susceptibility to infections and we show a defect in the cellular immune response. Early stages of phagocytosis proceed normally in mauve mutant hemocytes but, unlike in wild type, late phagosomes fuse and generate large vacuoles containing many bacteria. Autophagy is similarly affected in mauve fat bodies as starvation‐induced autophagosomes grow beyond their normal size. Together these data suggest a model in which Mauve functions to restrict homotypic fusion of different pre‐lysosomal organelles and LROs.     

Lysosomal enzyme leakage during the hypoxanthine/xanthine oxidase reaction

Impairment of lysosomal stability due to reactive oxygen species generated during the oxidation of hypoxanthine by xanthine oxidase was studied in rat liver lysosomes isolated in a discontinuous Nycodenz gradient. Production of O ₂ ^⋅ and H₂O₂ during the hypoxanthine/xanthine oxidase reaction occurred for at least 5 min, while lysosomal damage, indicated by the release of N-acetyl-β-glucosaminidase, occurred within 30 s, there being no further damage to these organelles thereafter. The extent of lysosomal enzyme release increased with increasing xanthine oxidase concentration. Superoxide dismutase and catalase did not prevent lysosomal damage during the hypoxanthine/xanthine oxidase reaction. Lysosomes reduced xanthine oxidase activity, as assessed in terms of O₂ consumption, only slightly but substantially inhibited in a competitive manner the O ₂ ^⋅ -mediated reduction of cytochrome c. This inhibition was almost completely reversed by potassium cyanide, thus pointing to the presence of a cyanide-sensitive Superoxide dismutase in the lysosomal fraction. However, potassium cyanide did not affect the hypoxanthine/xanthine oxidase-mediated lysosomal damage, thus suggesting an inability of the lysosomal superoxide dismutase to protect the organelles. Negligible malondialdehyde formation was observed in the lysosomes either during the hypoxanthine/xanthine oxidase reaction or with different selective experimental approaches known to produce lipid peroxidation in other organelles such as microsomes and mitochondria. These results are interpreted in terms of a possible lysosomal membrane permeability to O ₂ ^⋅ causing organelle impairment by a process that, though leading to enzyme-marker leakage, does not involve lipid peroxidation.     

Lysosomal enzyme leakage during the hypoxanthine/xanthine oxidase reaction

Impairment of lysosomal stability due to reactive oxygen species generated during the oxidation of hypoxanthine by xanthine oxidase was studied in rat liver lysosomes isolated in a discontinuous Nycodenz gradient. Production of O2.- and H2O2 during the hypoxanthine/xanthine oxidase reaction occurred for at least 5 min, while lysosomal damage, indicated by the release of N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminidase, occurred within 30 s, there being no further damage to these organelles thereafter. The extent of lysosomal enzyme release increased with increasing xanthine oxidase concentration. Superoxide dismutase and catalase did not prevent lysosomal damage during the hypoxanthine/xanthine oxidase reaction. Lysosomes reduced xanthine oxidase activity, as assessed in terms of O2 consumption, only slightly but substantially inhibited in a competitive manner the O2.- -mediated reduction of cytochrome c. This inhibition was almost completely reversed by potassium cyanide, thus pointing to the presence of a cyanide-sensitive superoxide dismutase in the lysosomal fraction. However, potassium cyanide did not affect the hypoxanthine/xanthine oxidase-mediated lysosomal damage, thus suggesting an inability of the lysosomal superoxide dismutase to protect the organelles. Negligible malondialdehyde formation was observed in the lysosomes either during the hypoxanthine/xanthine oxidase reaction or with different selective experimental approaches known to produce lipid peroxidation in other organelles such as microsomes and mitochondria.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)     

Quantitative proteomic analysis of host epithelial cells infected by Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium

Systems‐level analyses have the capability to offer new insight into host–pathogen interactions on the molecular level. Using Salmonella infection of host epithelial cells as a model system, we previously analyzed intracellular bacterial proteome as a window into pathogens’ adaptations to their host environment [Infect. Immun. 2015; J. Proteome Res. 2017]. Herein we extended our efforts to quantitatively examine protein expression of host cells during infection. In total, we identified more than 5000 proteins with 194 differentially regulated proteins upon bacterial infection. Notably, we found marked induction of host integrin signaling and glycolytic pathways. Intriguingly, up‐regulation of host glucose metabolism concurred with increased utilization of glycolysis by intracellular Salmonella during infection. In addition to immunoblotting assays, we also verified the up‐regulation of PARP1 in the host nucleus by selected reaction monitoring and immunofluorescence studies. Furthermore, we provide evidence that PARP1 elevation is likely specific to Salmonella infection and independent of one of the bacterial type III secretion systems. Our work demonstrates that unbiased high‐throughput proteomics can be used as a powerful approach to provide new perspectives on host–pathogen interactions.     

Sweet host revenge: Galectins and GBPs join forces at broken membranes

Most bacterial pathogens enter and exit eukaryotic cells during their journey through the vertebrate host. In order to endure inside a eukaryotic cell, bacterial invaders commonly employ bacterial secretion systems to inject host cells with virulence factors that co‐opt the host's membrane trafficking systems and thereby establish specialised pathogen‐containing vacuoles (PVs) as intracellular niches permissive for microbial growth and survival. To defend against these microbial adversaries hiding inside PVs, host organisms including humans evolved an elaborate cell‐intrinsic armoury of antimicrobial weapons that include noxious gases, antimicrobial peptides, degradative enzymes, and pore‐forming proteins. This impressive defence machinery needs to be accurately delivered to PVs, in order to fight off vacuole‐dwelling pathogens. Here, I discuss recent evidence that the presence of bacterial secretion systems at PVs and the associated destabilisation of PV membranes attract such antimicrobial delivery systems consisting of sugar‐binding galectins as well as dynamin‐like guanylate‐binding proteins (GBPs). I will review recent advances in our understanding of intracellular immune recognition of PVs by galectins and GBPs, discuss how galectins and GBPs control host defence, and highlight important avenues of future research in this exciting area of cell‐autonomous immunity.     

Bacterial Endocytic Systems in Plants and Animals: Ca2+ as a Common Theme?

Intracellular interactions between bacteria and host cells are widespread in nature. In this review, the similarity between the infection processes of bacteria in plant and animal cells will be addressed. As paradigms, we selected the symbiosis between rhizobia and leguminous plants, and the survival of intracellular pathogenic bacteria in animal cells. The rhizobial symbiosis with leguminous plants is a model system for the study of plant-bacterium interactions. Through this interaction, the bacteria are released in a vacuole-like structure, called the symbiosome. The molecular processes, which lead to a functional symbiosome, are far from known. However, membrane fusion processes, and therefore also Ca²⁺, are crucial to establish this highly specialized organelle-like structure. A homologous system is the infection by certain bacterial pathogens of animal cells. These bacteria enter their host via phagocytosis and avoid the fusion with lysosomes, resulting in a membrane-bound vacuole in which the pathogens survive. The origin and maturation of this phagosome depends on Ca²⁺-signaling processes in the host cell and on proteins that regulate membrane fusion processes, such as SNAREs, Rab proteins, synaptotagmins and calmodulin. The aim of this review is to compare the endosymbiosis in leguminous plants with the surviving pathogens in animal host cells with a focus on Ca²⁺-signaling and membrane fusion-related processes. For both systems, the interaction starts with a bacterial entry of the host cell. It will be demonstrated that in both cases Ca²⁺ is a crucial second messenger. However, more emphasis will be put on the comparison of the later stages of infection, i.e., the formation of specialized bacteria-containing vacuoles. From structural, functional, and proteomic data, it is clear that phagosomes and symbiosomes are more related to each other than originally assumed. Proteins such as V-ATPases, calreticulin, phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase, Rab proteins, and SNAREs are present in both the phagosome and the symbiosome membrane, indicating that common cellular processes are used for building these intracellular organelles.     

Toxoplasma gondii Vps11, a subunit of HOPS and CORVET tethering complexes,is essential for the biogenesis of secretory organelles

Apicomplexan parasites harbour unique secretory organelles (dense granules, rhoptries and micronemes) that play essential functions in host infection. Toxoplasma gondii parasites seem to possess an atypical endosome‐like compartment, which contains an assortment of proteins that appear to be involved in vesicular sorting and trafficking towards secretory organelles. Recent studies highlighted the essential roles of many regulators such as Rab5A, Rab5C, sortilin‐like receptor and syntaxin‐6 in secretory organelle biogenesis. However, little is known about the protein complexes that recruit Rab‐GTPases and SNAREs for membrane tethering in Apicomplexa. In mammals and yeast, transport, tethering and fusion of vesicles from early endosomes to lysosomes and the vacuole, respectively, are mediated by CORVET and HOPS complexes, both built on the same Vps‐C core that includes Vps11 protein. Here, we show that a T. gondii Vps11 orthologue is essential for the biogenesis or proper subcellular localization of secretory organelle proteins. TgVps11 is a dynamic protein that associates with Golgi endosomal‐related compartments, the vacuole and immature apical secretory organelles. Conditional knock‐down of TgVps11 disrupts biogenesis of dense granules, rhoptries and micronemes. As a consequence, parasite motility, invasion, egress and intracellular growth are affected. This phenotype was confirmed with additional knock‐down mutants of the HOPS complex. In conclusion, we show that apicomplexan parasites use canonical regulators of the endolysosome system to accomplish essential parasite‐specific functions in the biogenesis of their unique secretory organelles.