Drosophila Me31B is a Dual eIF4E-Interacting Protein

Eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) is a key factor involved in different aspects of mRNA metabolism. Drosophila melanogaster genome encodes eight eIF4E isoforms, and the canonical isoform eIF4E-1 is a ubiquitous protein that plays a key role in mRNA translation. eIF4E-3 is specifically expressed in testis and controls translation during spermatogenesis. In eukaryotic cells, translational control and mRNA decay is highly regulated in different cytoplasmic ribonucleoprotein foci, which include the processing bodies (PBs). In this study, we show that Drosophila eIF4E-1 and eIF4E-3 occur in PBs along the DEAD-box RNA helicase Me31B. We show that Me31B interacts with eIF4E-1 and eIF4E-3 by means of yeast two-hybrid system, FRET in D. melanogaster S2 cells and coimmunoprecipitation in testis. Truncation and point mutations of Me31B proteins show two eIF4E-binding sites located in different protein domains. Residues Y401-L407 (at the carboxy-terminus) are essential for interaction with eIF4E-1, whereas residues F63-L70 (at the amino-terminus) are critical for interaction with eIF4E-3. The residue W117 in eIF4E-1 and the homolog position F103 in eIF4E-3 are necessary for Me31B-eIF4E interaction suggesting that the change of tryptophan to phenylalanine provides specificity. Me31B represents a novel type of eIF4E-interacting protein with dual and specific interaction domains that might be recognized by different eIF4E isoforms in different tissues, adding complexity to the control of gene expression in eukaryotes.     

Activation of cap-independent translation by variant eukaryotic initiation factor 4G in vivo

Protein synthesis is tightly controlled by assembly of an intricate ribonucleoprotein complex at the m⁷GTP-cap on eukaryotic mRNAs. Ensuing linear scanning of the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) is believed to transfer the preinitiation complex to the initiation codon. Eukaryotic mRNAs are characterized by significant 5′ UTR heterogeneity, raising the possibility of differential control of translation initiation rate at individual mRNAs. Curiously, many mRNAs with unconventional, highly structured 5′ UTRs encode proteins with central biological roles in growth control, metabolism, or stress response. The 5′ UTRs of such mRNAs may influence protein synthesis rate in multiple ways, but most significantly they have been implicated in mediating alternative means of translation initiation. Cap-independent initiation bypasses strict control over the formation of initiation intermediates at the m⁷GTP cap. However, the molecular mechanisms that favor alternative means of ribosome recruitment are not understood. Here we provide evidence that eukaryotic initiation factor (eIF) 4G controls cap-independent translation initiation at the c-myc and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) 5′ UTRs in vivo. Cap-independent translation was investigated in tetracycline-inducible cell lines expressing either full-length eIF4G or a C-terminal fragment (Ct) lacking interaction with eIF4E and poly(A) binding protein. Expression of Ct, but not intact eIF4G, potently stimulated cap-independent initiation at the c-myc/VEGF 5′ UTRs. In vitro RNA-binding assays suggest that stimulation of cap-independent translation initiation by Ct is due to direct association with the c-myc/VEGF 5′ UTR, enabling 43S preinitiation complex recruitment. Our work demonstrates that variant translation initiation factors enable unconventional translation initiation at mRNA subsets with distinct structural features.     

BrunoL1 regulates endoderm proliferation through translational enhancement of cyclin A2 mRNA

Developmental control of proliferation relies on tight regulation of protein expression. Although this has been well studied in early embryogenesis, how the cell cycle is regulated during organogenesis is not well understood. Bruno-Like RNA binding proteins bind to consensus sequences in the 3′UTR of specific mRNAs and repress protein translation, but much of this functional information is derived from studies on mainly two members, Drosophila Bruno and vertebrate BrunoL2 (CUGBP1). There are however, six vertebrate and three Drosophila Bruno family members, but less is known about these other family members, and none have been shown to function in the endoderm. We recently identified BrunoL1 as a dorsal pancreas enriched gene, and in this paper we define BrunoL1 function in Xenopus endoderm development. We find that, in contrast to other Bruno-Like proteins, BrunoL1 acts to enhance rather than repress translation. We demonstrate that BrunoL1 regulates proliferation of endoderm cells through translational control of cyclin A2 mRNA. Specifically BrunoL1 enhanced translation of cyclin A2 through binding consensus Bruno Response Elements (BREs) in its 3′UTR. We compared the ability of other Bruno-Like proteins, both vertebrate and invertebrate, to stimulate translation via the cyclin A2 3′UTR and found that only Drosophila Bru-3 had similar activity. In addition, we also found that both BrunoL1 and Bru-3 enhanced translation of mRNAs containing the 3′UTRs of Drosophila oskar or cyclin A, which have been well characterized to mediate repression. Lastly, we show that it is the Linker region of BrunoL1 that is both necessary and sufficient for this activity. These results are the first example of BRE-dependent translational enhancement and are the first demonstration in vertebrates of Bruno-Like proteins regulating translation through BREs.     

Control of Cell Survival and Proliferation by Mammalian Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4B

Translation initiation plays an important role in cell growth, proliferation, and survival. The translation initiation factor eIF4B (eukaryotic initiation factor 4B) stimulates the RNA helicase activity of eIF4A in unwinding secondary structures in the 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR) of the mRNA in vitro. Here, we studied the effects of eIF4B depletion in cells using RNA interference (RNAi). In agreement with the role of eIF4B in translation initiation, its depletion resulted in inhibition of this step. Selective reduction of translation was observed for mRNAs harboring strong to moderate secondary structures in their 5′UTRs. These mRNAs encode proteins, which function in cell proliferation (Cdc25C, c-myc, and ODC [ornithine decarboxylase]) and survival (Bcl-2 and XIAP [X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis]). Furthermore, eIF4B silencing led to decreased proliferation rates, promoted caspase-dependent apoptosis, and further sensitized cells to camptothecin-induced cell death. These results demonstrate that eIF4B is required for cell proliferation and survival by regulating the translation of proliferative and prosurvival mRNAs.Targeting the translation initiation pathway is emerging as a potential therapy for inhibiting cancer cell growth (35, 38). Ribosome recruitment to the 5′ ends of eukaryotic mRNAs proceeds via translation initiation mechanisms that are dependent either on the 5′ cap structure (m⁷GpppN, where N is any nucleotide) or an internal ribosome entry site (IRES). The majority of translation initiation events in eukaryotes are mediated through cap-dependent translation whereby the 40S ribosomal subunit is recruited to the vicinity of the mRNA 5′ cap structure by the eukaryotic initiation factor 4F (eIF4F) complex. eIF4F is comprised of eIF4E (the cap-binding subunit), eIF4A (an RNA helicase), and eIF4G (a large scaffolding protein for eIF4E, eIF4A, and other initiation factors). Once assembled at the 5′ cap, the 40S ribosomal subunit in association with several initiation factors scans the 5′ untranslated region (5′UTR) of the mRNA until it encounters a start codon in a favorable context, followed by polypeptide synthesis (37).Early in vitro studies have shown that the initiation factor eIF4B acts to potentiate ribosome recruitment to the mRNA (3, 45). eIF4B stimulates translation of both capped and uncapped mRNAs in vitro (1, 36). This function is exerted through stimulation of the helicase activity of eIF4A (43), possibly through direct interactions with eIF4A (44) or with mRNA, the ribosome-associated eIF3, and 18S rRNA (28, 29, 44). Thus, eIF4B is thought to form auxiliary bridges between the mRNA and the 40S ribosomal subunit. Toeprinting studies using mammalian eIF4B underscored its importance in the assembly of the 48S initiation complex, especially on mRNAs harboring secondary structures in the 5′UTRs (11).In vivo studies of eIF4B are limited. Ectopic expression of eIF4B in cultured Drosophila melanogaster cells and in developing eye imaginal discs stimulated cell proliferation (16). Enhanced cell proliferation is most likely mediated by increased translation of a subset of mRNAs, since knockdown of Drosophila eIF4B by RNA interference (RNAi) caused a modest reduction in global translation but compromised the survival of insect cells grown under low serum conditions (16). Studies of eIF4B in mammalian cells yielded contradictory results. Transient overexpression of eIF4B stimulated translation initiation in a phosphorylation-dependent manner in some cells (18, 49) while inhibiting translation in others (30, 31, 41). These differences might be attributed to disparate levels of eIF4B overexpression.To address the physiological role of eIF4B in mRNA translation in the cell, RNAi knockdown of eIF4B was used here. We demonstrate that eIF4B is required for optimal translation. Importantly, the translation of mRNAs bearing structured 5′UTRs, such as the cell cycle regulators Cdc25C, c-myc, and ODC (ornithine decarboxylase), and the antiapoptotic factors Bcl-2 and XIAP (X-linked inhibitor of apoptosis), was reduced as a result of eIF4B silencing by RNAi. Furthermore, eIF4B silencing promoted caspase-dependent apoptosis. Thus, we show that mammalian eIF4B is required for cell proliferation and survival, whereby it acts by regulating the translation of a functionally related subset of mRNAs.     

JKTBP1 is involved in stabilization and IRES-dependent translation of NRF mRNAs by binding to 5' and 3' untranslated regions

Heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein D-like protein (JKTBP) 1 was implicated in cap-independent translation by binding to the internal ribosome entry site in the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) of NF-κB-repressing factor (NRF). Two different NRF mRNAs have been identified so far, both sharing the common 5′ internal ribosome entry site but having different length of 3′ UTRs. Here, we used a series of DNA and RNA luciferase reporter constructs comprising 5′, 3′ or both NRF UTRs to study the effect of JKTBP1 on translation of NRF mRNA variants. The results indicate that JKTBP1 regulates the level of NRF protein expression by binding to both NRF 5′ and 3′ UTRs. Using successive deletion and point mutations as well as RNA binding studies, we define two distinct JKTBP1 binding elements in NRF 5′ and 3′ UTRs. Furthermore, JKTBP1 requires two distinct RNA binding domains to interact with NRF UTRs and a short C-terminal region for its effect on NRF expression. Together, our study shows that JKTBP1 contributes to NRF protein expression via two disparate mechanisms: mRNA stabilization and cap-independent translation. By binding to 5′ UTR, JKTBP1 increases the internal translation initiation in both NRF mRNA variants, whereas its binding to 3′ UTR elevated primarily the stability of the major NRF mRNA. Thus, JKTBP1 is a key regulatory factor linking two pivotal control mechanisms of NRF gene expression: the cap-independent translation initiation and mRNA stabilization.     

DAP5 associates with eIF2β and eIF4AI to promote Internal Ribosome Entry Site driven translation

Initiation is a highly regulated rate-limiting step of mRNA translation. During cap-dependent translation, the cap-binding protein eIF4E recruits the mRNA to the ribosome. Specific elements in the 5′UTR of some mRNAs referred to as Internal Ribosome Entry Sites (IRESes) allow direct association of the mRNA with the ribosome without the requirement for eIF4E. Cap-independent initiation permits translation of a subset of cellular and viral mRNAs under conditions wherein cap-dependent translation is inhibited, such as stress, mitosis and viral infection. DAP5 is an eIF4G homolog that has been proposed to regulate both cap-dependent and cap-independent translation. Herein, we demonstrate that DAP5 associates with eIF2β and eIF4AI to stimulate IRES-dependent translation of cellular mRNAs. In contrast, DAP5 is dispensable for cap-dependent translation. These findings provide the first mechanistic insights into the function of DAP5 as a selective regulator of cap-independent translation.     

Y-box Binding Protein 1: Providing a New Angle on Translational Regulation

Current models of translational regulation are mostly focused on how translational factors engage a messenger mRNA to the ribosome to initiate translation. Since the majority of mRNAs in eukaryotes are translated in a cap-dependent manner, the mRNA 5’ cap-binding protein eIF4E was characterized as a key player responsible for the recruitment of mRNAs to the initiation complex. The availability of eIF4E is believed to be especially critical for translational activation of mRNAs with extensive secondary structures in their 5’UTRs, many of which code for labile regulatory proteins essential for cell growth or viability. Surprisingly, little attention is paid to the other side of translational control, e.g., to define mechanisms responsible for translational silencing and storage of the above messages. In this review, we discuss the possibility that eIF4E per se may not be sufficient to release mRNAs from translational block. We found that many growth- and stress-related mRNAs are associated with the translational repressor YB-1, which can compete with the eIF4E-driven translation initiation complex for binding to the capped 5’ mRNA terminus. Moreover, the cap-dependent repressor activity of YB-1 appears to be negatively regulated via Akt-mediated phosphorylation of the Ser-102 residue of YB-1. Taken together with recent evidence suggesting that translational activation of growth-related messages is a primary cellular response to activation of Ras-Erk and PI3K-Akt signaling pathways, our data suggest that differential expression of specific mRNA subsets is regulated by the PI3K-Akt pathway and achieved via coordinated activation of the components of translational machinery and inactivation of general translational repressors such as YB-1.     

Human 4E-T represses translation of bound mRNAs and enhances microRNA-mediated silencing

A key player in translation initiation is eIF4E, the mRNA 5′ cap-binding protein. 4E-Transporter (4E-T) is a recently characterized eIF4E-binding protein, which regulates specific mRNAs in several developmental model systems. Here, we first investigated the role of its enrichment in P-bodies and eIF4E-binding in translational regulation in mammalian cells. Identification of the conserved C-terminal sequences that target 4E-T to P-bodies was enabled by comparison of vertebrate proteins with homologues in Drosophila (Cup and CG32016) and Caenorhabditis elegans by sequence and cellular distribution. In tether function assays, 4E-T represses bound mRNA translation, in a manner independent of these localization sequences, or of endogenous P-bodies. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction and northern blot analysis verified that bound mRNA remained intact and polyadenylated. Ectopic 4E-T reduces translation globally in a manner dependent on eIF4E binding its consensus Y³⁰X₄Lϕ site. In contrast, tethered 4E-T continued to repress translation when eIF4E-binding was prevented by mutagenesis of YX₄Lϕ, and modestly enhanced the decay of bound mRNA, compared with wild-type 4E-T, mediated by increased binding of CNOT1/7 deadenylase subunits. As depleting 4E-T from HeLa cells increased steady-state translation, in part due to relief of microRNA-mediated silencing, this work demonstrates the conserved yet unconventional mechanism of 4E-T silencing of particular subsets of mRNAs.     

The Nematode Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 4E/G Complex Works with a trans-Spliced Leader Stem-Loop To Enable Efficient Translation of Trimethylguanosine-Capped RNAs

Eukaryotic mRNA translation begins with recruitment of the 40S ribosome complex to the mRNA 5′ end through the eIF4F initiation complex binding to the 5′ m⁷G-mRNA cap. Spliced leader (SL) RNA trans splicing adds a trimethylguanosine (TMG) cap and a sequence, the SL, to the 5′ end of mRNAs. Efficient translation of TMG-capped mRNAs in nematodes requires the SL sequence. Here we define a core set of nucleotides and a stem-loop within the 22-nucleotide nematode SL that stimulate translation of mRNAs with a TMG cap. The structure and core nucleotides are conserved in other nematode SLs and correspond to regions of SL1 required for early Caenorhabditis elegans development. These SL elements do not facilitate translation of m⁷G-capped RNAs in nematodes or TMG-capped mRNAs in mammalian or plant translation systems. Similar stem-loop structures in phylogenetically diverse SLs are predicted. We show that the nematode eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E/G (eIF4E/G) complex enables efficient translation of the TMG-SL RNAs in diverse in vitro translation systems. TMG-capped mRNA translation is determined by eIF4E/G interaction with the cap and the SL RNA, although the SL does not increase the affinity of eIF4E/G for capped RNA. These results suggest that the mRNA 5′ untranslated region (UTR) can play a positive and novel role in translation initiation through interaction with the eIF4E/G complex in nematodes and raise the issue of whether eIF4E/G-RNA interactions play a role in the translation of other eukaryotic mRNAs.Cap-dependent translation initiation in eukaryotes is a complex process involving many factors and serves as the primary mechanism for eukaryotic translation (37, 44). The first step in the initiation process, recruitment of the m⁷G (7-methylguanosine)-capped mRNA to the ribosome, is widely considered the rate-limiting step. It begins with recognition of and binding to the m⁷G cap at the 5′ end of the mRNA by the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4F (eIF4F) complex, which contains three proteins: eIF4E (a cap-binding protein), eIF4G (a scaffold protein with RNA binding sites), and eIF4A (an RNA helicase). eIF4G''s interaction with eIF3, itself a multisubunit complex that interacts with the 40S ribosome, facilitates the actual recruitment of capped RNA to the ribosome. With the help of several other initiation factors, the small ribosomal subunit scans the mRNA from 5′ to 3′ until a translation initiation codon (AUG) in appropriate context is identified and an 80S ribosomal complex is formed, after which the first peptide bond is formed, thus ending the initiation process (37, 44). The AUG context can play an important role in the efficiency of translation initiation (23, 44). The length, structure, and presence of AUGs or open reading frames in the mRNA 5′ untranslated region (UTR) can negatively affect cap-dependent translation and ribosomal scanning. In general, long and highly structured 5′ UTRs, as well as upstream AUGs leading to short open reading frames, can impede ribosome scanning and lead to reduced translation (23, 44). In addition, 5′ UTRs less than 10 nucleotides (nt) in length are thought to be too short to enable preinitiation complex assembly and scanning (24). Thus, several attributes of the mRNA 5′ UTR are known to negatively affect translation initiation, whereas only the AUG context and the absence of negative elements are known to have a positive effect on translation initiation (44).Two of the important mRNA features associated with cap-dependent translation, the cap and the 5′ UTR, are significantly altered by an RNA processing event known as spliced leader (SL) trans splicing (3, 8, 17, 26, 36, 47). This takes place in members of a diverse group of eukaryotic organisms, including some protozoa, sponges, cnidarians, chaetognaths, flatworms, nematodes, rotifers, crustaceans, and tunicates (17, 28, 39, 55, 56). In SL trans splicing, a separately transcribed small exon (16 to 51 nucleotides [nt]) with its own cap gets added to the 5′ end of pre-mRNAs. This produces mature mRNAs with a unique cap and a conserved sequence in the 5′ UTR. In metazoa, the m⁷G cap is replaced with a trimethylguanosine (TMG) cap (m^2,2,7GpppN) (27, 30, 46, 49). In nematodes, ∼70% of all mRNAs are trans spliced and therefore have a TMG cap and an SL (2). In general, eukaryotic eIF4E proteins do not effectively recognize the TMG cap (35). This raises the issues of how the translation machinery in trans-splicing metazoa effectively recognizes TMG-capped trans-spliced mRNAs, what role the SL sequence plays in translation initiation, and how the conserved translation initiation machinery has adapted to effectively translate trans-spliced mRNAs.Previous work has shown that efficient translation of TMG-capped messages in nematodes requires the SL sequence (22 nt) immediately downstream of the cap (5, 25, 29). In the current studies, we sought to understand the manner in which the SL enhanced the translation of TMG-capped mRNAs. Using a cell-free nematode in vitro translation system, we carried out mutational analyses that define the specific sequences in the SL that are required and sufficient for efficient translation of TMG-capped mRNAs. These analyses led to the discovery of a small, discrete stem-loop immediately adjacent to the TMG cap in trans-spliced messages required for efficient translation. Notably, the sequences involved in the base pairing of the stem are highly conserved in alternative SL sequences found in nematodes. We further show that the nematode eIF4E/G complex plays a major role in facilitating the SL enhancement of TMG-capped mRNA that likely occurs after the initial cap-binding step. The results demonstrate the importance of specific enhancing elements in the 5′ UTR and adaptation in the eIF4F complex necessary for optimal cap-dependent translation.     

Binding specificities and potential roles of isoforms of eukaryotic initiation factor 4E in Leishmania

The 5' cap structure of trypanosomatid mRNAs, denoted cap 4, is a complex structure that contains unusual modifications on the first four nucleotides. We examined the four eukaryotic initiation factor 4E (eIF4E) homologues found in the Leishmania genome database. These proteins, denoted LeishIF4E-1 to LeishIF4E-4, are located in the cytoplasm. They show only a limited degree of sequence homology with known eIF4E isoforms and among themselves. However, computerized structure prediction suggests that the cap-binding pocket is conserved in each of the homologues, as confirmed by binding assays to m(7)GTP, cap 4, and its intermediates. LeishIF4E-1 and LeishIF4E-4 each bind m(7)GTP and cap 4 comparably well, and only these two proteins could interact with the mammalian eIF4E binding protein 4EBP1, though with different efficiencies. 4EBP1 is a translation repressor that competes with eIF4G for the same residues on eIF4E; thus, LeishIF4E-1 and LeishIF4E-4 are reasonable candidates for serving as translation factors. LeishIF4E-1 is more abundant in amastigotes and also contains a typical 3' untranslated region element that is found in amastigote-specific genes. LeishIF4E-2 bound mainly to cap 4 and comigrated with polysomal fractions on sucrose gradients. Since the consensus eIF4E is usually found in 48S complexes, LeishIF4E-2 could possibly be associated with the stabilization of trypanosomatid polysomes. LeishIF4E-3 bound mainly m(7)GTP, excluding its involvement in the translation of cap 4-protected mRNAs. It comigrates with 80S complexes which are resistant to micrococcal nuclease, but its function is yet unknown. None of the isoforms can functionally complement the Saccharomyces cerevisiae eIF4E, indicating that despite their structural conservation, they are considerably diverged.     

Novel RNA-binding Protein P311 Binds Eukaryotic Translation Initiation Factor 3 Subunit b (eIF3b) to Promote Translation of Transforming Growth Factor β1-3 (TGF-β1-3)

P311, a conserved 8-kDa intracellular protein expressed in brain, smooth muscle, regenerating tissues, and malignant glioblastomas, represents the first documented stimulator of TGF-β1-3 translation in vitro and in vivo. Here we initiated efforts to define the mechanism underlying P311 function. PONDR® (Predictor Of Naturally Disordered Regions) analysis suggested and CD confirmed that P311 is an intrinsically disordered protein, therefore requiring an interacting partner to acquire tertiary structure and function. Immunoprecipitation coupled with mass spectroscopy identified eIF3 subunit b (eIF3b) as a novel P311 binding partner. Immunohistochemical colocalization, GST pulldown, and surface plasmon resonance studies revealed that P311-eIF3b interaction is direct and has a K_d of 1.26 μm. Binding sites were mapped to the non-canonical RNA recognition motif of eIF3b and a central 11-amino acid-long region of P311, here referred to as eIF3b binding motif. Disruption of P311-eIF3b binding inhibited translation of TGF-β1, 2, and 3, as indicated by luciferase reporter assays, polysome fractionation studies, and Western blot analysis. RNA precipitation assays after UV cross-linking and RNA-protein EMSA demonstrated that P311 binds directly to TGF-β 5′UTRs mRNAs through a previously unidentified RNA recognition motif-like motif. Our results demonstrate that P311 is a novel RNA-binding protein that, by interacting with TGF-βs 5′UTRs and eIF3b, stimulates the translation of TGF-β1, 2, and 3.     

Genome-Wide Identification of Alternative Splice Forms Down-Regulated by Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay in Drosophila

Alternative mRNA splicing adds a layer of regulation to the expression of thousands of genes in Drosophila melanogaster. Not all alternative splicing results in functional protein; it can also yield mRNA isoforms with premature stop codons that are degraded by the nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD) pathway. This coupling of alternative splicing and NMD provides a mechanism for gene regulation that is highly conserved in mammals. NMD is also active in Drosophila, but its effect on the repertoire of alternative splice forms has been unknown, as has the mechanism by which it recognizes targets. Here, we have employed a custom splicing-sensitive microarray to globally measure the effect of alternative mRNA processing and NMD on Drosophila gene expression. We have developed a new algorithm to infer the expression change of each mRNA isoform of a gene based on the microarray measurements. This method is of general utility for interpreting splicing-sensitive microarrays and high-throughput sequence data. Using this approach, we have identified a high-confidence set of 45 genes where NMD has a differential effect on distinct alternative isoforms, including numerous RNA–binding and ribosomal proteins. Coupled alternative splicing and NMD decrease expression of these genes, which may in turn have a downstream effect on expression of other genes. The NMD–affected genes are enriched for roles in translation and mitosis, perhaps underlying the previously observed role of NMD factors in cell cycle progression. Our results have general implications for understanding the NMD mechanism in fly. Most notably, we found that the NMD–target mRNAs had significantly longer 3′ untranslated regions (UTRs) than the nontarget isoforms of the same genes, supporting a role for 3′ UTR length in the recognition of NMD targets in fly.