Specificity of presenilin‐1‐ and presenilin‐2‐dependent γ‐secretases towards substrate processing

The two presenilin‐1 (PS1) and presenilin‐2 (PS2) homologs are the catalytic core of the γ‐secretase complex, which has a major role in cell fate decision and Alzheimer's disease (AD) progression. Understanding the precise contribution of PS1‐ and PS2‐dependent γ‐secretases to the production of β‐amyloid peptide (Aβ) from amyloid precursor protein (APP) remains an important challenge to design molecules efficiently modulating Aβ release without affecting the processing of other γ‐secretase substrates. To that end, we studied PS1‐ and PS2‐dependent substrate processing in murine cells lacking presenilins (PSs) (PS1KO, PS2KO or PS1‐PS2 double‐KO noted PSdKO) or stably re‐expressing human PS1 or PS2 in an endogenous PS‐null (PSdKO) background. We characterized the processing of APP and Notch on both endogenous and exogenous substrates, and we investigated the effect of pharmacological inhibitors targeting the PSs activity (DAPT and L‐685,458). We found that murine PS1 γ‐secretase plays a predominant role in APP and Notch processing when compared to murine PS2 γ‐secretase. The inhibitors blocked more efficiently murine PS2‐ than murine PS1‐dependent processing. Human PSs, especially human PS1, expression in a PS‐null background efficiently restored APP and Notch processing. Strikingly, and contrary to the results obtained on murine PSs, pharmacological inhibitors appear to preferentially target human PS1‐ than human PS2‐dependent γ‐secretase activity.     

γ‐Secretase Inhibition Induces Muscle Hypertrophy in a Notch‐Independent Mechanism

A wide variety of cellular processes and signaling events are regulated by the proteolytic enzyme γ‐secretase. Notch‐1 is one of the substrates of γ‐secretase and its role in the regulation of muscle differentiation has been well described. Importantly, besides Notch‐1, a number of proteins have been identified to undergo proteolysis by γ‐secretase. To date, the specific role of γ‐secretase during embryonic skeletal muscle differentiation has not been studied. Therefore, we address this question through the analysis of in vitro grown chick myogenic cells during the formation of multinucleated myotubes. The γ‐secretase inhibitor DAPT (N‐N[‐(3,5‐Difluorophenacetyl‐l ‐alanyl)]‐S‐328 phenylglycine‐t‐butyl‐ester) induces muscle hypertrophy. Knockdown of Notch‐1 using siRNA specific to chick shows no significant effect in myotube size, suggesting that γ‐secretase‐dependent effects on muscle hypertrophy in chick myogenic cells are Notch‐1‐independent. We also investigate the effects of γ‐secretase inhibition in the whole proteomic profile of chick myogenic cells. We identified 276 differentially expressed proteins from Label‐free proteomic approach. Data overview of interaction network obtained from STRING show that after γ‐secretase inhibition cells exhibited imbalance in protein metabolism, cytoskeleton/adhesion, and Sonic Hedgehog signaling. The collection of these results provides new insights into the role of γ‐secretase in skeletal muscle hypertrophy.     

γ‐Secretase‐Dependent Cleavage Initiates Notch Signaling from the Plasma Membrane

Notch signaling is critical to animal development, and its dysregulation leads to human maladies ranging from birth defects to cancer. Although endocytosis is currently thought to promote signal activation by delivering activated Notch to endosome‐localized γ‐secretase, the data are controversial and the mechanisms that control Notch endocytosis remain poorly defined. Here, we investigated the relationship between Notch internalization and signaling. siRNA‐mediated depletion studies reveal that Notch endocytosis is clathrin‐dependent and requires epsin1, the adaptor protein complex (AP2) and Nedd4. Moreover, we show that epsin1 interaction with Notch is ubiquitin‐dependent. Contrary to the current model, we show that internalization defects lead to elevated γ‐secretase‐mediated Notch processing and downstream signaling. These results indicate that signal activation occurs independently of Notch endocytosis and that γ‐secretase cleaves Notch at the plasma membrane. These observations support a model where endocytosis serves to downregulate Notch in signal‐receiving cells.     

Notch signaling and ERK activation are important for the osteomimetic properties of prostate cancer bone metastatic cell lines

Prostate cancer bone metastases are characterized by their ability to induce osteoblastic lesions and local bone formation. It has been suggested that bone metastatic prostate cancer cells are osteomimetic and capable of expressing genes and proteins typically expressed by osteoblasts. The ability of preosteoblasts to differentiate and express osteoblastic genes depends on several pathways, including Notch and MAPK. Here we show that notch1 expression is increased 4-5 times in C4-2B and MDA PCa 2b cells (osteoblastic skeletal prostate metastatic cancer cell lines) when compared with nonskeletal metastatic cell lines (LNCaP and DU145). Notch1 ligand, dll1, is expressed only in C4-2B cells. Immunohistochemical studies demonstrate that Notch1 is present in both human clinical samples from prostate cancer bone metastases and the C4-2B cell line. To determine whether prostate cancer bone metastases respond to osteogenic induction similar to osteoblasts, C4-2B cells were cultured in osteogenic medium that promotes mineralization. C4-2B cells mineralize and express HES-1 (a downstream target of Notch), an effect that is completely inhibited by L-685,458, a Notch activity inhibitor. Furthermore, osteogenic induction increases ERK activation, runx2 expression, and nuclear localization, independent of Notch signaling. Finally, we show that Notch and ERK activation are essential for Runx2 DNA binding activity and osteocalcin gene expression in C4-2B cells in response to osteogenic induction. These studies demonstrate that prostate cancer bone metastatic cell lines acquire osteoblastic properties through independent activation of ERK and Notch signaling; presumably, both pathways are activated in the bone microenvironment.     

MUC1 is a substrate for γ‐secretase

Understanding the underlying mechanisms by which a normal cell avoids the oncogenic potential of MUC1 signaling requires further definition of the pathways by which the MUC1 cytoplasmic tail is processed in both normal and tumor‐derived cells. In the present study we describe the processing pathway initiated by TACE/ADAM17 cleavage of MUC1. Utilizing the human uterine epithelial cell line, HES, derived from normal endometrium, we show that endogenous full length MUC1 undergoes regulated intramembranous proteolysis mediated by presenillin‐dependent γ‐secretase. Cytokine‐stimulated HES cells exposed to γ‐secretase inhibitors accumulated a membrane‐associated 15 kDa fragment of the MUC1 C‐terminal subunit (CTF15). Inhibitors of TACE/ADAM17‐mediated shedding inhibited accumulation of MUC1‐CTF15 and MUC1 ectodomain release to a similar extent consistent with MUC1‐CTF15 being a product of TACE/ADAM17 action. Reduction of catalytically active γ‐secretase complex by nicastrin siRNA treatment also resulted in CTF15 accumulation. Furthermore, mature nicastrin, the substrate receptor for γ‐secretase, co‐immunoprecipitated with CTF15 in the presence of γ‐secretase inhibitors indicating the formation of CTF15: nicastrin complexes. MUC1‐CTF15 accumulation in response to γ‐secretase inhibition was demonstrated in both normal and tumor‐derived cells from humans and mice indicating that this processing pathway exists in many cell contexts. We did not detect products of MUC1 cleavage by γ‐secretase in the presence of various proteasomal inhibitors indicating that subsequent degradation is either non‐proteasomal or extremely efficient. We suggest that this efficient pathway attenuates potential signaling mediated by cytoplasmic tail fragments. J. Cell. Biochem. 108: 802–815, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

miR‐124 interacts with the Notch1 signalling pathway and has therapeutic potential against gastric cancer

Aberrant Notch signalling plays an important role in cancer progression. However, little is known about the interaction between miRNA and the Notch signalling pathway and its role in gastric cancer (GC). In this study, we found that miR‐124 was down‐regulated in GC compared with adjacent normal tissue. Forced expression of miR‐124 inhibited GC cell growth, migration and invasion, and induced cell cycle arrest. miR‐124 negatively regulated Notch1 signalling by targeting JAG1. miR‐124 levels were also shown to be inversely correlated with JAG1 expression in GC. Furthermore, we found that the overexpression of the intracellular domain of Notch1 repressed miR‐124 expression, promoted GC cell growth, migration and invasion. Conversely, blocking Notch1 using a γ‐secretase inhibitor up‐regulated miR‐124 expression, inhibited GC cell growth, migration and invasion. In conclusion, our data demonstrates a regulatory feedback loop between miR‐124 and Notch1 signalling in GC cells, suggesting that the miR‐124/Notch axis may be a potential therapeutic target against GC.     

Down‐regulation of Notch‐1 and Jagged‐1 inhibits prostate cancer cell growth,migration and invasion,and induces apoptosis via inactivation of Akt,mTOR, and NF‐κB signaling pathways

Notch signaling is involved in a variety of cellular processes, such as cell fate specification, differentiation, proliferation, and survival. Notch‐1 over‐expression has been reported in prostate cancer metastases. Likewise, Notch ligand Jagged‐1 was found to be over‐expressed in metastatic prostate cancer compared to localized prostate cancer or benign prostatic tissues, suggesting the biological significance of Notch signaling in prostate cancer progression. However, the mechanistic role of Notch signaling and the consequence of its down‐regulation in prostate cancer have not been fully elucidated. Using multiple cellular and molecular approaches such as MTT assay, apoptosis assay, gene transfection, real‐time RT‐PCR, Western blotting, migration, invasion assay and ELISA, we found that down‐regulation of Notch‐1 or Jagged‐1 was mechanistically associated with inhibition of cell growth, migration, invasion and induction of apoptosis in prostate cancer cells, which was mediated via inactivation of Akt, mTOR, and NF‐κB signaling. Consistent with these results, we found that the down‐regulation of Notch‐1 or Jagged‐1 led to decreased expression and the activity of NF‐κB downstream genes such as MMP‐9, VEGF, and uPA, contributing to the inhibition of cell migration and invasion. Taken together, we conclude that the down‐regulation of Notch‐1 or Jagged‐1 mediated inhibition of cell growth, migration and invasion, and the induction of apoptosis was in part due to inactivation of Akt, mTOR, and NF‐κB signaling pathways. Our results further suggest that inactivation of Notch signaling pathways by innovative strategies could be a potential targeted approach for the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. J. Cell. Biochem. 109: 726–736, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Affinity pulldown of γ‐secretase and associated proteins from human and rat brain

γ‐Secretase is a transmembrane protease complex responsible for the processing of a multitude of type 1 transmembrane proteins, including amyloid precursor protein (APP) and Notch. A functional complex is dependent on the assembly of four proteins: presenilin (PS), nicastrin, Aph‐1 and Pen‐2. Little is known about how the substrates are selected by γ‐secretase, but it has been suggested that γ‐secretase associated proteins (GSAPs) could be of importance. For instance, it was recently reported from studies in cell lines that TMP21, a transmembrane protein involved in trafficking, binds to γ‐secretase and regulates the processing of APP‐derived substrates without affecting Notch cleavage. Here, we present an efficient and selective method for purification and analysis of γ‐secretase and GSAPs. Microsomal membranes were prepared from rat or human brain and incubated with a γ‐secretase inhibitor coupled to biotin via a long linker and a S‐S bridge. After pulldown using streptavidin beads, bound proteins were eluted under reducing conditions and digested by trypsin. The tryptic peptides were subjected to LC‐MS/MS analysis, and proteins were identified by sequence data from MS/MS spectra. All of the known γ‐secretase components were identified. Interestingly, TMP21 and the PS associated protein syntaxin1 were associated to γ‐secretase in rat brain. We suggest that the present method can be used for further studies on the composition of the γ‐secretase complex.     

Notch‐1 signaling is lost in prostate adenocarcinoma and promotes PTEN gene expression

Prostate tumorigenesis is associated with loss of PTEN gene expression. We and others have recently reported that PTEN is regulated by Notch‐1 signaling. Herein, we tested the hypothesis that alterations of the Notch‐1 signaling pathway are present in human prostate adenocarcinoma and that Notch‐1 signaling regulates PTEN gene expression in prostate cells. Prostate adenocarcinoma cases were examined by immunohistochemistry for ligand cleaved (activated) Notch‐1 protein. Tumor foci exhibited little cleaved Notch‐1 protein, but expression was observed in benign tissue. Both tumor and benign tissue expressed total (uncleaved) Notch‐1. Reduced Hey‐1 expression was seen in tumor foci but not in benign tissue, confirming loss of Notch‐1 signaling in prostate adenocarcinoma. Retroviral expression of constitutively active Notch‐1 in human prostate tumor cell lines resulted in increased PTEN gene expression. Incubation of prostate cell lines with the Notch‐1 ligand, Delta, resulted in increased PTEN expression indicating that endogenous Notch‐1 regulates PTEN gene expression. Chromatin immunoprecipitation demonstrated that CBF‐1 was bound to the PTEN promoter. These data collectively indicate that defects in Notch‐1 signaling may play a role in human prostate tumor formation in part via a mechanism that involves regulation of the PTEN tumor suppressor gene. J. Cell. Biochem. 107: 992–1001, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Masking of Transmembrane‐Based Retention Signals Controls ER Export of γ‐Secretase

γ‐Secretase is critically involved in the Notch pathway and in Alzheimer's disease. The four subunits of γ‐secretase assemble in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and unassembled subunits are retained/retrieved to the ER by specific signals. We here describe a novel ER‐retention/retrieval signal in the transmembrane domain (TMD) 4 of presenilin 1, a subunit of γ‐secretase. TMD4 also is essential for complex formation, conferring a dual role for this domain. Likewise, TMD1 of Pen2 is bifunctional as well. It carries an ER‐retention/retrieval signal and is important for complex assembly by binding to TMD4. The two TMDs directly interact with each other and mask their respective ER‐retention/retrieval signals, allowing surface transport of reporter proteins. Our data suggest a model how assembly of Pen2 into the nascent γ‐secretase complex could mask TMD‐based ER‐retention/retrieval signals to allow plasma membrane transport of fully assembled γ‐secretase.     

The stress response neuropeptide CRF increases amyloid‐β production by regulating γ‐secretase activity

The biological underpinnings linking stress to Alzheimer's disease (AD) risk are poorly understood. We investigated how corticotrophin releasing factor (CRF), a critical stress response mediator, influences amyloid‐β (Aβ) production. In cells, CRF treatment increases Aβ production and triggers CRF receptor 1 (CRFR1) and γ‐secretase internalization. Co‐immunoprecipitation studies establish that γ‐secretase associates with CRFR1; this is mediated by β‐arrestin binding motifs. Additionally, CRFR1 and γ‐secretase co‐localize in lipid raft fractions, with increased γ‐secretase accumulation upon CRF treatment. CRF treatment also increases γ‐secretase activity in vitro, revealing a second, receptor‐independent mechanism of action. CRF is the first endogenous neuropeptide that can be shown to directly modulate γ‐secretase activity. Unexpectedly, CRFR1 antagonists also increased Aβ. These data collectively link CRF to increased Aβ through γ‐secretase and provide mechanistic insight into how stress may increase AD risk. They also suggest that direct targeting of CRF might be necessary to effectively modulate this pathway for therapeutic benefit in AD, as CRFR1 antagonists increase Aβ and in some cases preferentially increase Aβ42 via complex effects on γ‐secretase.     

MicroRNA‐760 Inhibits Doxorubicin Resistance in Hepatocellular Carcinoma through Regulating Notch1/Hes1‐PTEN/Akt Signaling Pathway

Accumulating studies have suggested that microRNA‐760 (miR‐760) plays an important role in chemoresistance of various cancer cells. However, whether miR‐760 regulates the chemoresistance of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains unclear. In this study, we found that miR‐760 was decreased in HCC cell lines, and doxorubicin (Dox) treatment significantly decreased miR‐760 expression in HCC cells. Overexpression of miR‐760 sensitized HCC cells to Dox‐induced cytotoxicity and apoptosis, whereas miR‐760 inhibition showed the opposite effects. Notch1 was predicted as a target gene of miR‐760. miR‐760 negatively regulated Notch1 expression and Notch1/Hes1 signaling. Overexpression of miR‐760 increased PTEN expression and decreased the phosphorylation of Akt. Activation of Notch signaling significantly reversed the inhibitory effect of miR‐760 on Dox‐resistance and abrogated the effect of miR‐760 on the PTEN/Akt signaling pathway in HCC cells. Overall, our results demonstrate that miR‐760 inhibits Dox‐resistance in HCC cells through inhibiting Notch1 and promoting PTEN expression.     

Aph‐1 is required to regulate Presenilin‐mediated γ‐secretase activity and cell survival in Drosophila wing development

Aph‐1 is a multipass transmembrane protein and an essential component of the Presenilin (Psn)‐mediated γ‐secretase complex. During protease assembly, Aph‐1 stabilizes the newly synthesized Psn holoprotein to facilitate generation of the active form of Psn, which is a Psn‐NTF/Psn‐CTF heterodimer produced through a Presenilinase‐initiated endoproteolytic cleavage of the Psn holoprotein. Although it is clear that loss of Aph‐1 activity leads to failure of Psn heterodimer formation, little is understood about whether Aph‐1 plays a role in regulating γ‐secretase activity in addition to assisting Psn maturation. Using various modified Psn forms that do not require endoproteolysis or have a large deletion of the cytosolic loop, we show that in Drosophila Aph‐1 is still required for γ‐secretase activity independent of its role in promoting Psn endoproteolysis. In addition, our results indicate that Aph‐1 is required to promote cell survival in the wing imaginal disc; aph‐1 mutant cells are lost either through cell death or because of a defect in cell proliferation. This function of Aph‐1 is independent of its role in regulating γ‐secretase activity, but possibly involves downregulating the activity of uncleaved Psn holoprotein. genesis 47:169–174, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.     

Membrane dynamics of γ‐secretase with the anterior pharynx‐defective 1B subunit

The four‐subunit protease complex γ‐secretase cleaves many single‐pass transmembrane (TM) substrates, including Notch and β‐amyloid precursor protein to generate amyloid‐β (Aβ), central to Alzheimer's disease. Two of the subunits anterior pharynx‐defective 1 (APH‐1) and presenilin (PS) exist in two homologous forms APH1‐A and APH1‐B, and PS1 and PS2. The consequences of these variations are poorly understood and could affect Aβ production and γ‐secretase medicine. Here, we developed the first complete structural model of the APH‐1B subunit using the published cryo‐electron microscopy (cryo‐EM) structures of APH1‐A (Protein Data Bank: 5FN2, 5A63, and 6IYC). We then performed all‐atom molecular dynamics simulations at 303 K in a realistic bilayer system to understand both APH‐1B alone and in γ‐secretase without and with substrate C83‐bound. We show that APH‐1B adopts a 7TM topology with a water channel topology similar to APH‐1A. We demonstrate direct transport of water through this channel, mainly via Glu84, Arg87, His170, and His196. The apo and holo states closely resemble the experimental cryo‐EM structures with APH‐1A, however with subtle differences: The substrate‐bound APH‐1B γ‐secretase was quite stable, but some TM helices of PS1 and APH‐1B rearranged in the membrane consistent with the disorder seen in the cryo‐EM data. This produces different accessibility of water molecules for the catalytic aspartates of PS1, critical for Aβ production. In particular, we find that the typical distance between the catalytic aspartates of PS1 and the C83 cleavage sites are shorter in APH‐1B, that is, it represents a more closed state, due to interactions with the C‐terminal fragment of PS1. Our structural‐dynamic model of APH‐1B alone and in γ‐secretase suggests generally similar topology but some notable differences in water accessibility which may be relevant to the protein's existence in two forms and their specific function and location.     

Notch signalling inhibits the adipogenic differentiation of single‐cell‐derived mesenchymal stem cell clones isolated from human adipose tissue

ADSCs (adipose‐derived mesenchymal stem cells) are candidate adult stem cells for regenerative medicine. Notch signalling participates in the differentiation of a heterogeneous ADSC population. We have isolated, human adipose tissue‐derived single‐cell clones using a cloning ring technique and characterized for their stem cell characteristics. The role of Notch signalling in the differentiation capacity of these adipose‐derived single‐cell‐clones has also been investigated. All 14 clones expressed embryonic and mesenchymal stem cell marker genes. These clones could differentiate into both osteogenic and adipogenic lineages. However, the differentiation potential of each clone was different. Low adipogenic clones had significantly higher mRNA expression levels of Notch 2, 3 and 4, Jagged1, as well as Delta1, compared with those of high adipogenic clones. In contrast, no changes in expression of Notch signalling component mRNA between low and high osteogenic clones was found. Notch receptor mRNA expression decreased with the adipogenic differentiation of both low and high adipogenic clones. The γ‐secretase inhibitor, DAPT (N‐[N‐(3,5‐difluorophenacetyl)‐l ‐alanyl]‐(S)‐phenylglycine t‐butyl ester), enhanced adipogenic differentiation. Correspondingly, cells seeded on a Notch ligand (Jagged1) bound surface showed lower intracellular lipid accumulation. These results were noted in both low and high adipogenic clones, indicating that Notch signalling inhibited the adipogenic differentiation of adipose ADSC clones, and could be used to identify an adipogenic susceptible subpopulation for soft‐tissue augmentation application.     

Important functional role of residue x of the presenilin GxGD protease active site motif for APP substrate cleavage specificity and substrate selectivity of γ‐secretase

γ‐Secretase plays a central role in the generation of the Alzheimer disease‐causing amyloid β‐peptide (Aβ) from the β‐amyloid precursor protein (APP) and is thus a major Alzheimer′s disease drug target. As several other γ‐secretase substrates including Notch1 and CD44 have crucial signaling functions, an understanding of the mechanism of substrate recognition and cleavage is key for the development of APP selective γ‐secretase‐targeting drugs. The γ‐secretase active site domain in its catalytic subunit presenilin (PS) 1 has been implicated in substrate recognition/docking and cleavage. Highly critical in this process is its GxGD active site motif, whose invariant glycine residues cannot be replaced without causing severe functional losses in substrate selection and/or cleavage efficiency. Here, we have investigated the contribution of the less well characterized residue x of the motif (L383 in PS1) to this function. Extensive mutational analysis showed that processing of APP was overall well‐tolerated over a wide range of hydrophobic and hydrophilic mutations. Interestingly, however, most L383 mutants gave rise to reduced levels of Aβ_37–39 species, and several increased the pathogenic Aβ_42/43 species. Several of the Aβ_42/43‐increasing mutants severely impaired the cleavages of Notch1 and CD44 substrates, which were not affected by any other L383 mutation. Our data thus establish an important, but compared with the glycine residues of the motif, overall less critical functional role for L383. We suggest that L383 and the flanking glycine residues form a spatial arrangement in PS1 that is critical for docking and/or cleavage of different γ‐secretase substrates.     

Notch signaling is required for lateral induction of Jagged1 during FGF-induced lens fiber differentiation

Previous studies of the developing lens have shown that Notch signaling regulates differentiation of lens fiber cells by maintaining a proliferating precursor pool in the anterior epithelium. However, whether Notch signaling is further required after the onset of fiber cell differentiation is not clear. This work investigates the role of Notch2 and Jagged1 (Jag1) in secondary fiber cell differentiation using rat lens epithelial explants undergoing FGF-2 dependent differentiation in vitro. FGF induced Jag1 expression and Notch2 signaling (as judged by the appearance of activated Notch2 Intracellular Domain (N2ICD)) within 12-24 h. These changes were correlated with induction of the Notch effector, Hes5, upregulation of N-cadherin (N-cad), and downregulation of E-cadherin (E-cad), a cadherin switch characteristic of fiber cell differentiation. Induction of Jag1 was efficiently blocked by U0126, a specific inhibitor of MAPK/ERK signaling, indicating a requirement for signaling through this pathway downstream of the FGF receptor. Other growth factors that activate MAPK/ERK signaling (EGF, PDGF, IGF) did not induce Jag1. Inhibition of Notch signaling using gamma secretase inhibitors DAPT and L-685,458 or anti-Jag1 antibody markedly decreased FGF-dependent expression of Jag1 demonstrating Notch-dependent lateral induction. In addition, inhibition of Notch signaling reduced expression of N-cad, and the cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor, p57Kip2, indicating a direct role for Notch signaling in secondary fiber cell differentiation. These results demonstrate that Notch-mediated lateral induction of Jag1 is an essential component of FGF-dependent lens fiber cell differentiation.