Analgesic efficacy of orally administered buprenorphine in rats

The analgesic effect of orally administered buprenorphine was compared with that induced by a standard therapeutic injected dose (0.05 mg/kg of body weight, s.c.) in male Long-Evans rats. Analgesia was assessed by measuring pain threshold, using the hot-water tail-flick assay before and after administration of buprenorphine. The results suggest that a commonly used formula for oral buprenorphine in flavored gelatin, at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg, does not increase pain threshold in rats. Instead, oral buprenorphine doses of 5 and 10 mg/kg were necessary to induce significant increases in pain threshold. However, these doses had to be administered by orogastric infusion because the rats would not voluntarily eat flavored gelatin containing this much buprenorphine. The depth of analgesia induced by these infused doses was comparable to that induced by the clinically effective s.c. treatment (0.05 mg/kg).     

Influence of buprenorphine analgesia on post-operative recovery in two strains of rats.

The objective of this study was to establish an effective post-operative analgesic regimen for Sprague-Dawley (SD) and Dark Agouti (DA) rats. Buprenorphine (0.01 or 0.05 mg/kg), a partial mu opioid agonist, was administered subcutaneously immediately on completion of a standardized surgical procedure, involving anaesthesia, laparotomy and visceral manipulation. Two of the four treatment groups and the saline control group received a second injection 9 h later. Behavioural observations by three independent observers provided no information in assessing pain in this model. All rats lost weight, consumed less food and water after surgery. On the first day, both SD and DA rats receiving buprenorphine lost less weight than untreated control groups. Using weight loss as an efficacy criterion, low-dose buprenorphine, given once or twice, provided effective analgesia in SD rats. A higher single dose provided no additional benefit and a second dose was detrimental, reducing body weight and food intake. In DA rats, the high dose, given twice, appeared to be more effective than the lower dose. All DA cage cohorts consumed < 10% pre-operative food despite buprenorphine treatment, suggesting a higher dosage may be necessary. However, all SD and 80% DA rats who received no buprenorphine gained body weight on the second day, whereas most of the buprenorphine-treated rats continued to lose weight for another 2 days, despite increased food consumption by both strains. Buprenorphine may adversely affect intestinal function over a number of days due to its enterohepatic circulation; this effect may be more severe in DA rats. Adverse metabolic effects of buprenorphine and other opioids may preclude their use in the future if it can be shown that non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) provide equally effective analgesia.     

Effects of buprenorphine on body temperature, locomotor activity and cardiovascular function when assessed by telemetric monitoring in rats

Buprenorphine is a potent analgesic commonly used clinically in humans and rodents experiencing severe pain. However, effects of therapeutic doses on locomotor activity and the cardiovascular system have not been studied in conscious animals. The effects of buprenorphine were therefore evaluated in this study using telemetric monitoring in conscious animals. Telemetry transmitters were implanted in the peritoneal cavity of Wistar rats with a pressure catheter in the aorta and electrodes for electrocardiogram (ECG) recording subcutaneously. After a single subcutaneous administration of saline, each rat was administered single subcutaneous doses of 0.006, 0.03 or 0.15 mg/kg body weight (bw) of buprenorphine. During a 10 h period after administration, buprenorphine induced a varying dose-dependent increase in body temperature, heart rate, dP/dt and systolic-diastolic blood pressure, as well as a corresponding decrease in QT time. At high dose, however, QT time was still decreased 24 h post-administration, but no arrhythmias or visual changes were observed in the ECG complex. Body temperature and heart rate increased at the high dose of buprenorphine, even at 20-24 h after administration. Moreover, the high dose of buprenorphine induced a biphasic response in diastolic blood pressure, with an early and pronounced increase that, at 14 h after administration, reversed to a decrease, failing to normalize within 24 h post-dosage. The results indicate that buprenorphine induces long-lasting effects (such as body temperature and cardiovascular effects) in the rat after a single subcutaneous dose at 0.15 mg/kg bw.     

Oral buprenorphine and aspirin analgesia in rats undergoing liver transplantation

The objective of this study was to establish effective postoperative analgesia for Dark Agouti rats undergoing liver transplantation with minimal additional stress due to handling and no adverse effect on transplant outcome. Oral administration of buprenorphine (0.5 mg/kg/dose) or aspirin (100 mg/kg/dose) in raspberry-flavoured gelatine were compared to controls receiving no treatment or plain gelatine. The drugs were presented five times: immediately on recovery from anaesthesia and at 12 h intervals thereafter. All rats underwent right nephrectomy and replacement of their liver by an arterialized liver isograft preserved optimally for 24 h. All groups had reversible hepatic damage, lost weight and demonstrated severely reduced dark cycle activity after surgery. Neither treatment appeared to ameliorate the loss of body weight that probably reflected hepatic insufficiency during the first week as well as pain and surgical stress. In the second week, when liver function was 'normal', rats began to regain weight at the pre-transplant rate. Aspirin treatment significantly increased activity during the first and second dark cycles after surgery, whereas buprenorphine significantly increased activity during the second dark cycle only. Neither drug had any apparent adverse effects on the rats or on graft function. Postoperative oral administration of aspirin should be incorporated into future programmes of liver transplantation in rodents. More effective treatment in the immediate postoperative period may require oral administration of analgesia prior to surgery or a single subcutaneous injection of an analgesic agent on completion of surgery in addition to postoperative oral administration of aspirin.     

Antagonism of acute cocaine toxicity by buprenorphine.

The effect of buprenorphine pretreatment on the acute cocaine toxicity was assessed in male Swiss Webster mice. Buprenorphine pretreatment (0.15 or 0.30 mg/kg ip, 30 mins before) significantly attenuated the lethal effects of cocaine (60-140 mg/kg ip). The dose of cocaine which resulted in 50% mortality (LD50) in saline pretreated group was 100.61 mg/kg while the LD50 of cocaine in buprenorphine (0.15 and 0.3 mg/kg) pretreated groups were 113.57 and 118.16 mg/kg respectively. There was no significant change in the ratio of brain/plasma levels of cocaine in buprenorphine pretreated group when compared to the ratio from saline treated controls. Furthermore, neither naloxone (10 mg/kg ip, 15 mins before) nor naltrexone (3 mg/kg ip, 15 mins before) pretreatment affected the LD50 of cocaine. When tested 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 24 hrs after cocaine administration, sublethal dose of cocaine (80 mg/kg ip) injection resulted in significant increase in the plasma lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. Buprenorphine pretreatment significantly attenuated cocaine-induced release of LDH. These results suggest that buprenorphine could be of potential advantage over naloxone in the management of cocaine and heroin ("speed ball") toxicity and in studies on the pharmacotherapy of cocaine-induced toxicity, LDH levels may be used as a biochemical marker to assess the protective effects of drugs.     

Genetic differences in nicotine-induced conditioned taste aversion

Genetic differences in nicotine-induced conditioned taste aversion were examined using inbred mice. Adult male C57BL/6J, DBA/2J, BALB/cJ and C3H/heJ mice were adapted to a 2-h per day water access regimen. Subsequently, mice received nicotine injections (0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 mg/kg) immediately after 1-h access to a NaCl flavored solution. DBA and C3H mice developed dosedependent aversions to the nicotine-paired flavor. BALB mice showed only minor reductions in intake with no difference between the nicotine dose groups. C57BL mice did not show development of nicotine-induced conditioned taste aversion. These results demonstrate that nicotine's aversive motivational effect is strongly influenced by genotype. Further, genetic sensitivity (DBA mice) or insensitivity (C57BL mice) to nicotine-induced conditioned taste aversion was similar to reports of genetic sensitivity to ethanol's aversive effect measured in this design.     

Haemodynamic effects of buprenorphine after heart surgery.

The effect of buprenorphine on the cardiovascular system was examined in 11 patients during the period of reduced cardiac reserve after open-heart surgery. Within 10 minutes of giving the full analgesic dose (5 microgram/kg) intravenously the mean heart rate had fallen significantly by six beats/min. Although in two patients the mean arterial pressure fell by 24 mm Hg, there was no overall change in mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, or peripheral resistance. In a further six patients buprenorphine was used successfully as the sole analgesic after open-heart surgery. Buprenorphine appears to be safer than morphine for use in patients with reduced cardiac reserve and is of similar analgesic efficacy.     

Adverse effects on growth rates in rats caused by buprenorphine administration

As a routine postoperative treatment, a single dose of buprenorphine was given to rats at a dose of 0.05 mg/kg subcutaneously. However, some rats developed abnormal secretions around the nose and mouth and some animals died 3-5 days after surgery and analgesic treatment. At autopsy a yellow fibrous mass was found in the stomach and intestines. Observations of animals given buprenorphine revealed an abnormal ingestion of bedding material. This caused a disturbance to normal digestion, with gastric distension, weight loss or decreased growth rate, constipation and occasionally death. In this study rats were monitored for 6 days following surgery and analgesic treatment. A comparison of growth rates was made between rats given saline and buprenorphine or nalbuphine and between animals kept on bedding or grid floors for the first 24h after treatment. Of the animals held on bedding, the buprenorphine-treated animals did not lose weight as the other animals did, but had on the other hand a decreased growth rate during the measuring period of 6 days after surgery. When denied access to bedding for the first 24 h after surgery, rats given saline or nalbuphine had a reduced weight gain over the first 24 h, similar to the groups held on bedding. Rats held on grid floors and given buprenorphine continued to gain weight for the first 24 h. From day 3, there was no significant difference between the groups, which all gained weight.     

The effects of buprenorphine on behaviour in the ACI and BN rat inbred strains

Buprenorphine is a partial mu, kappa agonist that has been shown to influence spontaneous behaviour in animals. Previously, we have demonstrated significant differences in the analgesic response to buprenorphine between the August Copenhagen Irish (ACI)/SegHsd and the Brown Norway (BN)/RijHsd inbred rat strains. The purpose of this study was to determine whether these strains also differed in their behavioural response to buprenorphine in order to provide an additional parameter for the genetic analysis and localization of genes involved in this response. Male and female rats of both strains were used (n = 6/strain/sex) for this study. Each rat was subjected, respectively, to three treatment regimens at 15:00 h: (A) unchallenged; (B) intravenous saline; (C) intravenous buprenorphine (0.05 mg/kg) according to a crossover design. The relative duration (s/h) of locomotion, grooming, drinking and eating behaviour was subsequently determined from 15:30 to 07:00 h using the automatic registration system, Laboratory Animal Behaviour Registration and Analysis System(trade mark). Significant strain differences were observed in unchallenged behaviour between the ACI and the BN rats. ACI rats, but not BN rats, responded to buprenorphine treatment with decreased levels of locomotion, drinking and eating behaviour. The same treatment resulted in an increased grooming behaviour in both strains. Slight but significant sex differences were observed for locomotion and eating in the analysis of variance procedure, but did not reach the level of statistical significance in the multiple comparison procedure. The results of this study emphasize the possibility that strain-specific effects must be taken into account when using behavioural parameters for the assessment of the analgesic effects of buprenorphine in rats.     

Use of oral buprenorphine ('buprenorphine jello') for postoperative analgesia in rats--a clinical trial

Buprenorphine (0.1, 0.2, 0.3 or 0.4 mg/kg) in a flavoured gelatin base was administered preoperatively to rats undergoing a flank laparotomy. A control group of animals underwent surgery and received only flavoured gelatin. Body weight loss was significantly greater in the group which received no analgesia than in any of the analgesic-treated groups (P < 0.01). Food consumption was reduced significantly in all groups except in those animals which received 0.3 mg/kg buprenorphine. Water consumption was significantly reduced in the control (no analgesia) group (P < 0.001), but was not significantly depressed in the analgesic-treated groups (P > 0.05). Between-group comparisons did not show any significant difference between the different dose rates of analgesia used on either the change in body weight or the reduction in food or water consumption. The results of this study support the use of buprenorphine jelly for post-surgical analgesia in rats. This route of delivery is easy to use, and causes a minimum of stress to the rats.     

The antinociceptive efficacy of buprenorphine administered through the drinking water of rats

Postoperative pain management in laboratory animals is important for animal welfare and required under law in many countries. Frequent injection of analgesics to rodents after surgery is stressful for the animals and labour-intensive for animal care personnel. An alternative dosing scheme such as administration of analgesics in the drinking water would be desirable. However, the efficacy of a chronic oral analgesic treatment via this route has not yet been documented. This study investigated the antinociceptive efficacy of buprenorphine administered ad libitum via the drinking water of laboratory rats. The antinociceptive efficacy of buprenorphine in drinking water was compared with repeated subcutaneous injections. A comparison was also made between buprenorphine in drinking water and the combination of one single subcutaneous injection of buprenorphine followed by buprenorphine in drinking water. Antinociception was assessed by use of an analgesiometric model measuring the rats' latency time to withdrawal from a noxious heat stimulus applied to the plantar surface of the paw. Results revealed that buprenorphine in drinking water (0.056 mg/mL) induced significant increases in paw withdrawal latency times during a three-day period of administration with a maximal effect at 39 h after the start of buprenorphine administration. One single injection of buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg s.c.) followed by buprenorphine in the drinking water (0.056 mg/mL) induced an earlier onset of antinociception than buprenorphine in drinking water alone. In contrast, buprenorphine (0.1 mg/kg s.c.) injected every 8 h over a period of three days did not result in significant increases in paw withdrawal latency times. In conclusion, our results suggest that one single subcutaneous injection of buprenorphine followed by buprenorphine in drinking water may be a viable treatment option for the relief of pain in laboratory rats, but at the doses used in this study in pain-free rats it was associated with a decrease in water intake and some behavioural changes.     

Intravenous buprenorphine reduces pupil size and the light reflex in humans

The pupillary effects of intravenous buprenorphine were studied in eight nondependent male subjects who reported previous opiate use. Buprenorphine (0.3, 0.6, and 1.2 mg) decreased pupil size, the amplitude of the light reflex, and the velocities of constriction and dilation. Significant pupillary effects occurred within 15 min of the injection and persisted for 24 hr. At 48 hr most measures returned to baseline levels. Generally the magnitude of the effect was not dose related although recovery occurred sooner after the lower dose. The time course of the pupillary effects of buprenorphine exceeds duration of its analgesic and subjective effects. Previous studies have reported that pupillary measures are especially sensitive to the acute effects of full opiate agonists. The results of the present study indicate that buprenorphine, a partial opiate agonist, causes profound and persistent effects on pupillary size and dynamic measures.     

Oral buprenorphine is anti-inflammatory and modulates the pathogenesis of streptococcal cell wall polymer-induced arthritis in the Lew/SSN rat

This study was carried out to determine an effective regimen for pain management in streptococcal cell wall (SCW)-induced arthritis in female Lew/SSN rats. Forty weanling rats lin 2 groups) were trained to accept disks of jelly as part of their dietary regimen. At 8 weeks of age weighing 150 g, SCW arthritis was induced and sublingual buprenorphine tablets were incorporated into the jelly disks to alleviate the pain of acute arthritis, which developed 24 h post-induction. Group A rats received buprenorphine at a rate of 1 mg/kg 12 hourly. Group B rats received buprenorphine at a rate of 2 mg/kg 12 hourly. Both groups of rats were monitored for symptoms of distress using an adaptation of the Morton and Griffin scale of adverse reactions. Group A rats with severe arthritis required additional subcutaneous (s.c.) injections of buprenorphine to alleviate the adverse effects of arthritis. Group B rats, with twice the dose of buprenorphine did not require additional s.c. injections of buprenorphine. Histological sections of rat hocks indicated that the inflammation was suppressed in Group B rats. We concluded that oral administration of buprenorphine is an effective method of pain management in the pathogenesis of SCW-induced arthritis in Lew/SSN rats. In this model of arthritis, oral buprenorphine has a significant anti-inflammatory effect and appears to modulate the destructive arthritic phase in joints in this animal model of arthritis.     

Evaluation of Buprenorphine in a Postoperative Pain Model in Rats

We evaluated the commonly prescribed analgesic buprenorphine in a postoperative pain model in rats, assessing acute postoperative pain relief, rebound hyperalgesia, and the long-term effects of postoperative opioid treatment on subsequent opioid exposure. Rats received surgery (paw incision under isoflurane anesthesia), sham surgery (anesthesia only), or neither and were treated postoperatively with 1 of several doses of subcutaneous buprenorphine. Pain sensitivity to noxious and nonnoxious mechanical stimuli at the site of injury (primary pain) was assessed at 1, 4, 24, and 72 h after surgery. Pain sensitivity at a site distal to the injury (secondary pain) was assessed at 24 and 72 h after surgery. Rats were tested for their sensitivity to the analgesic and locomotor effects of morphine 9 to 10 d after surgery. Buprenorphine at 0.05 mg/kg SC was determined to be the most effective; this dose induced isoalgesia during the acute postoperative period and the longest period of pain relief, and it did not induce long-term changes in opioid sensitivity in 2 functional measures of the opioid system. A lower dose of buprenorphine (0.01 mg/kg SC) did not meet the criterion for isoalgesia, and a higher dose (0.1 mg/kg SC) was less effective in pain relief at later recovery periods and induced a long-lasting opioid tolerance, indicating greater neural adaptations. These results support the use of 0.05 mg/kg SC buprenorphine as the upper dose limit for effective treatment of postoperative pain in rats and suggest that higher doses produce long-term effects on opioid sensitivity.Relief of postoperative pain is mandated in the Guide for the Care and Use of Animals¹⁸ and the Public Health Service Policy¹⁷ and is a major objective of laboratory animal medicine. Buprenorphine is one of the most commonly used opioid analgesics for postoperative pain in laboratory animals, mainly because of its long duration of action.¹⁰ The typical recommended dose range of buprenorphine in rats is 0.02 to 0.05 mg/kg SC.¹⁰ The upper end of this range, although effective at relieving acute postoperative pain in rats, is associated with side effects such as enhanced postoperative pain after the drug has worn off (rebound hyperalgesia),²³ respiratory depression,²¹ nausea or gastrointestinal distress and pica,²⁵ and neural adaptations (for example, sensitization) that may lead to long-term changes in neural function in the central nervous system and consequent changes in behavior.¹⁴ Central sensitization is a well-studied neural adaptation expressed in the brain and spinal cord and induced by nociceptive stimulation (that is, pain-induced by surgical manipulation) that manifests as hyperalgesia (decreased pain threshold to noxious stimuli) and allodynia (appearance of pain-like responses to nonnoxious tactile stimuli) during the recovery period.^16,29 Central sensitization contributes to persistent pain during the postoperative recovery period (that is, maintenance of increased pain sensitivity during tissue recovery) and chronic pain in some pathologic conditions (that is, persistent pain sensitivity after full tissue recovery). Central sensitization also accounts for the spread of hyperalgesia and allodynia to noninjured areas of the body distal to the injury.³¹ This phenomenon is referred to as ‘secondary pain’ (secondary hyperalgesia and allodynia), because it is not directly associated with the primary injury site.Opioid analgesics inhibit pain by acting on the nervous system to block transduction of pain signals traveling in sensory neurons toward the central nervous system and by facilitating activity of the descending pain inhibition neural pathway.¹⁶ Opioid analgesics also induce neural adaptations in the nervous system, phenomena that underlie the pronounced changes in behavior associated with addiction to narcotics.² Notably, opioid analgesics have been shown to enhance central sensitization initiated by pain transmission.^6,8,14,20 This property means that opiate analgesics facilitate both the inhibition of pain and central sensitization that leads to the enhancement of pain. Because central sensitization is a neural adaptation, the interaction of opiates on this pain mechanism outlasts the presence of the drug; in contrast, opiate effects on pain inhibition are limited to the presence of the drug. This arrangement is thought to account for rebound pain, that is, increased pain sensitivity after the opiate analgesic has worn off. Opiate side effects can compromise the success of recovery by increasing the level of distress experienced during recovery (for example, inducing nausea) and possibly increasing the duration of distress during recovery (for example, allowing for rebound pain). Moreover, and of importance specifically to laboratory animal medicine, the general neural adaptations induced by even a single dose of an opiate analgesic²⁶ may induce changes in the nervous system that alter and therefore compromise the validity of the animal model under study (for example, opioid mechanisms involved in behavioral control).We previously evaluated the feasibility of oral administration of buprenorphine.^15,25 As a basis for comparison, we used the ‘gold-standard’ postoperative buprenorphine dose of 0.05 mg/kg SC. The results of those studies showed that oral administration of buprenorphine was not feasible because the dose necessary to produce analgesia comparable to the standard dose of 0.05 mg/kg SC was 10 times the oral dose recommended in the literature and because the resulting concentration of oral buprenorphine was too bitter for rats to ingest voluntarily in a volume of flavored foodstuff that they could eat in a single meal.^15,25 We also observed that both subcutaneous and oral buprenorphine caused conditioned aversion to flavors,²⁵ suggestive of gastrointestinal distress⁵, with a greater effect for the oral route. Our conclusions and the associated clinical recommendation were limited by our presumption that buprenorphine at 0.05 mg/kg SC was the ideal postsurgical dose.An assessment of the literature that established this dose identified 2 problems. First, little or no research had directly assessed the effect of buprenorphine on pain sensitivity in animals in the hyperalgesic state that characterized the postoperative period,²³ and to our knowledge, no study has directly assessed the dose–response function of postsurgical buprenorphine on hyperalgesia. We hypothesized that endogenous opioids activated during the postoperative period²⁴ might act synergistically with buprenorphine to allow adequate relief of postoperative pain with a lower dose of buprenorphine than is necessary in an algesiometric test, thereby making predictions and extrapolations from algesiometric tests inaccurate. Second, we found that little consideration had been given to the consequences of other physiologic effects of buprenorphine on the recovery process (for example, gastrointestinal distress⁵, rebound hyperalgesia, and allodynia). As stated earlier, recent research on central sensitization has determined that although opioid analgesics inhibit pain sensation acutely, they also enhance neural adaptations that account for rebound pain and other long-term chronic pain conditions.^16,28,29,31 We hypothesized secondarily that a lower dose of buprenorphine, if effective acutely, would result in reduced side effects and be less likely to initiate or enhance neural adaptations, such as rebound hyperalgesia and allodynia.The current study had 2 goals. The first was to establish the minimum dose of buprenorphine needed to relieve acute postoperative pain effectively in rats. As a starting point, we defined effective relief of acute pain as the induction of isoalgesia during the postoperative period; isoalgesia is the normal level of pain sensation, in contrast to analgesia (absence of pain sensation) or hypoalgesia (lower-than-normal pain sensation). The second goal was to evaluate the effect of postoperative buprenorphine on factors that slow recovery (that is, rebound hyperalgesia and allodynia) or create long-term changes (that is, sensitization or tolerance to opiates). We tested our hypothesis by using various doses of buprenorphine in a rat model of incisional pain.^3,4,31 This model was selected because it induces cutaneous and muscular pain common to most surgery and generates mild to moderate persistent pain so that both the acute inhibitory effects of the buprenorphine (that is, pain relief) and the lasting effects of buprenorphine (that is, rebound hyperalgesia) could be studied.     

Are repeated doses of buprenorphine detrimental to postoperative recovery after laparotomy in rats?

Buprenorphine is a widely used analgesic for relief of postoperative pain in rats. The effect of repeated doses of buprenorphine throughout the postoperative pain and stress response is unknown. This investigation tested the hypotheses that (a) daily analgesic doses of buprenorphine for 7 d ameliorate the stress response after laparotomy in rats and (b) preoperative buprenorphine better ameliorates the response than do peri- and postoperative administration. Postoperative effects on body weight, daily food and water consumption, and daily fecal and urinary outputs were monitored in groups of rats treated for 7 d with analgesic doses of buprenorphine initiated at different time points relative to the time of laparotomy. Analgesic doses of buprenorphine had no effect on the study parameters in healthy unoperated rats. Daily injection of buprenorphine delayed the time at which the preoperative body weight was restored without decreasing the postoperative changes in daily food consumption, water intake, and fecal and urinary outputs in the operated rats. The effects of daily analgesic doses of buprenorphine for 7 d on body weight, daily food, and water consumption, and fecal and urinary outputs were minimal and less statistically significant than the changes caused by surgery itself. However, this dosing regimen seems to delay the restoration of body weight after abdominal surgery in rats.     

Buprenorphine: a reappraisal of its antinociceptive effects and therapeutic use in alleviating post-operative pain in animals

Buprenorphine has been widely used for post-operative analgesia in laboratory animals. Clinical efficacy has been demonstrated in both subjective and objective pain assessment schemes, however doubts have been expressed as to its value as an analgesic. Initial dosage recommendations were based on analgesiometric studies. It is unlikely, however, that the pain elicited in analgesiometric tests is comparable to post-operative pain. This has resulted in recommendations of excessive dose rates and inappropriate clinical indications. Studies involving tests of the efficacy of buprenorphine for alleviating behavioural or other signs of tonic (post-surgical) pain provide a more appropriate estimation of the analgesic capabilities of the drug. However, buprenorphine also has major effects upon the behaviour of normal (unoperated) animals, and this makes assessments of efficacy difficult with some of the systems used for scoring clinical pain. Nevertheless, our most recent studies of the effects of buprenorphine upon pain-related behaviours in rats support the view that it is an effective post-operative analgesic. This short review critically reappraises the role of buprenorphine in this capacity and discusses a rational approach to the relief of pain in laboratory animals. We conclude that buprenorphine remains a valuable agent for pain relief in a wide range of animal species when used in an appropriate manner.     

Duration of effects on clinical parameters and referred hyperalgesia in rats after abdominal surgery and multiple doses of analgesic

This study evaluated the duration of clinical effects and referred hyperalgesia in rats (n = 10 per group) undergo ing abdominal surgery with analgesics (ketoprofen at 3 mg/kg and buprenorphine at 0.01 or 0.1 mg/kg) administered intramuscularly twice daily for 72 h beginning prior to surgery; no-surgery and no-analgesia control groups were included. Food and water consumption and body weight were monitored daily. As a measure of referred hyperalgesia, tail-flick latency was measured daily, before and 4 h after analgesia administration. Compared with those of the no-surgery controls, significant decreases in food consumption and body weight occurred 24 h after surgery without analgesics. There were nonsignificant reductions in these effects by analgesics, but the benefits were not significantly different than those of saline. These parameters continued to be decreased with variable significance in the buprenorphine groups at 48 and 72 h after surgery. In both buprenorphine-treated groups, water consumption was significantly increased at 24 h after surgery but not at 48 or 72 h. Tail-flick latency was not significantly different between the no-surgery and no-analgesia groups but was significantly increased 4 h after high-dose buprenorphine administration and declined nonsignificantly over time in the other groups. We conclude that painful effects from surgery are present primarily during the first 24 h after surgery. The analgesic regimens tested did not completely reduce these effects. Buprenorphine was associated with adverse effects for as long as 72 h after surgery. Referred hyperalgesia from this abdominal surgery could not be measured using the tail-flick assay.     

Gamma-L-glutamyl-taurine (Litoralon) affects conditioned taste aversion in rats

The dipeptide gamma-L-glutamyl-taurine (Litoralon) reduced neophobia of rats at a dose of 5.0 mg/kg (i.p.) in a "one-bottle forced choice paradigm" for conditioned taste aversion (CTA), but did not significantly affect the rats' "memory" of intoxication following chronic treatment at doses of 0.05, 0.50 and 5.00 mg/kg (i.p.). Acute treatment with Litoralon (10-1000 micrograms/kg, i.p.) did not affect CTA checked in a "two-bottle test", when administered immediately following the unconditioned stimulus (LiCl injection). In contrast, when given 90 min prior to the retention test, the injection of Litoralon (50.0 micrograms/kg) and gamma-aminobutyryl ethanolamine phosphate (100 and 500 micrograms/kg) resulted in a significantly higher intake of saccharin solution by the rats. This effect is comparable to the action of diazepam tested in the same experimental procedure. The results support our hypothesis about the anti-conflict potencies of these dipeptides, exerted by reducing aversion of phobia and/or the anxiety level of the animals in the experimental situation.     

The effects of buprenorphine, nalbuphine and butorphanol alone or following halothane anaesthesia on food and water consumption and locomotor movement in rats.

Locomotor activity and food and water consumption are potentially indices of post-operative pain in laboratory rodents, but it is important to establish whether these variables are directly affected by opioid analgesics or by halothane anaesthesia in normal rats. The effects of three opioids, buprenorphine, nalbuphine and butorphanol administered alone or following halothane anaesthesia, were studied in groups of normal non-operated adult Wistar rats. All 3 analgesics affected food intake and activity levels, but had little or no effect on water intake. Buprenorphine caused a significant elevation of activity levels and a reduction in food intake at clinical doses (0.01 and 0.05 mg/kg s/c). Nalbuphine (0.5, 1 and 2 mg/kg s/c) caused a reduction in food intake but had a smaller stimulatory effect on locomotion. Butorphanol (0.4 mg/kg s/c) caused a reduction in food intake and elevation in activity. These results suggest that water consumption is likely to be a more reliable variable to use when assessing post-operative pain and the efficacy of analgesics in rats.     

Genetic differences in ethanol-induced hyperglycemia and conditioned taste aversion.

Genetic differences in the hyperglycemic response to acute ethanol exposure and ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion were examined using inbred mice. Adult male C57BL/6J and DBA/2J mice were injected with ethanol (0-6 g/kg, I.P.) and blood glucose levels determined over 4 h. C57 mice demonstrated greater dose-dependent elevations in blood glucose compared to DBA mice. In a conditioned taste aversion procedure, water deprived mice received ethanol injections (1-4 g/kg, I.P.) immediately after access to a NaCl flavored solution. DBA mice developed aversion to the ethanol-paired flavor at a lower dose (2 g/kg) than C57 mice. These results provide further support for a possible inverse genetic relationship between sensitivity to ethanol-induced hyperglycemia and sensitivity to conditioned taste aversion.