Larval development of Japanese 'conchostracans': part 2, larval development of Caenestheriella gifuensis (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Spinicaudata, Cyzicidae), with notes on homologies and evolution of certain naupliar appendages within the Branchiopoda

As part of a larger project examining and comparing the ontogeny of all major taxa of the Branchiopoda in a phylogenetic context, the larval development of Caenestheriella gifuensis (Ishikawa, 1895), a Japanese spinicaudatan ‘conchostracan’, is described by scanning electron microscopy. Seven different larval stages are recognised, in most cases based on significant morphological differences. They range in length from about 200 to 850 μm. Nauplius 1 has a plumb and lecithotrophic appearance with a rounded hind body and a labrum with an incipient medial spine. Limb segmentation is mostly unclear but the second antennae have more putative segments delineated than are expressed in the later stages. Feeding structures such as the mandibular coxal process and antennal coxal spine are only weakly developed. Nauplius 2 is very different from nauplius 1 and has three large spines on the labral margin and two long caudal spines. Feeding structures such as the mandibular coxal process and various spines and setae are developed, but whether feeding begins at this stage was not determined. The mandible has developed an ‘extra’ seta on endopod segment 1, absent in Nauplius 1. The segmentation of the second antenna has changed significantly due to fusions of various early segments. Nauplius 3 is like nauplius 2 in morphological detail, but larger and more elongate. Nauplius 4 has developed a pair of small anlagen of the carapace and rudiments of the first five pairs of trunk limbs, and the coxal spine of the antenna has become distally bifid. Nauplius 5 has a larger carapace anlage, externally visible enditic portions of the elongate trunk limbs, and a pair of primordial dorsal telson setae. Nauplius 6 has a larger and partly free carapace and better-developed, partly free trunk limbs with incipient enditic, endopodal, and exopodal setation. A pair of caudal spines, dorsal to the large caudal spines, has appeared. Nauplius 7 is quite similar to nauplius 6 but is larger and has slightly longer caudal and labral spines; also, the setation of the most anterior trunks limbs is better developed. The larval development is largely similar to that of other spinicaudatans. The larval mandible, which is evolutionarily conservative within the Branchiopoda, reveals a setation pattern similar to that of the Anostraca and Notostraca (two setae on mandibular endopod segment 1). Most other spinicaudatans and all examined laevicaudatans share another setal pattern (one seta on mandibular endopod segment 1), which could indicate a close relationship among these taxa. The second antenna undergoes a special development, which provides an insight into the evolution of this limb within the Branchiopoda. In nauplius 1 the basipod, endopod, and exopod are all superficially divided into a relatively high number of segments. In later nauplii some of these have fused, forming fewer but larger segments. We suggest that this ontogeny reflects the evolution of antennae in the conchostracans. Various aspects of the morphology of the antennae are discussed as possible synapormorphies for either the Diplostraca or subgroups of the Conchostraca.     

Homology of Holocene ostracode biramous appendages with those of other crustaceans: the protopod, epipod, exopod and endopod

Unambiguously biramous appendages with a proximal precoxa, well-defined coxa and basis, setose plate-like epipod originating on the precoxa, and both an endopod and exopod attached to the terminal end of the basis are described from several living Ostracoda of the order Halo-cyprida (Myodocopa). These limbs are proposed as the best choice for comparison of ostracode limbs with those of other crustaceans and fossil arthropods with preserved limbs, such as the Cambrian superficially ostracode-like Kunmingella and Hesslandona. The 2nd maxilla of Metapolycope (Cladocopina) and 1st trunk limb of Spelaeoecia, Deeveya and Thaumatoconcha (all Halocypridina) are illustrated, and clear homologies are shown between the parts of these limbs and those of some general crustacean models as well as some of the remarkable crustacean s.s. Orsten fossils. No living ostracodes exhibit only primitive morphology; all have at least some (usually many) derived characters. Few have the probably primitive attribute of trunk segmentation (two genera of halocyprid Myodocopa, one order plus one genus of Podocopa, and the problematic Manawa); unambiguously biramous limbs are limited to a few halo-cyprids. Homologies between podocopid limbs and those of the illustrated primitive myodocopid limbs are tentatively suggested. A setose plate-like extension, often attached basally to a podocopid protopod, is probably homologous to the myodocopid epipod, which was present at least as early as the Triassic. Somewhat more distal, less setose, and plate-like extensions, present on some podocopid limbs (e.g., mandible), may be homologous instead to the exopod (clearly present on myodocopid mandibles). The coxa (or precoxa) is by definition the most basal part of the limb. A molar-like tooth is present proximally on the mandibular protopod of many ostracodes; it is the coxal endite and projects medially from the coxa (or proximal protopod). The Ostracoda is probably a monophyletic crustacean group composed of Myodocopa and Podocopa. All have a unique juvenile (not a larva) initially with three or more limbs. Except that juveniles lack some setae and limbs, they are morphologially similar to the adult. Thus the following suite of characters in all instars may be considered a synapomorphy uniting all Ostracoda: (1) Each pair of limbs is uniquely different from the others. (2) The whole body is completely enclosed within a bivalved carapace that lacks growth lines. (3) No more than nine pairs of limbs are present in any instar. (4) The body shows little or no segmentation, with no more than ten dorsally defined trunk segments. No other crustaceans have this suite of characters. A probable synapomorphy uniting the Podocopa is a 2nd antenna with exopod reduced relative to the endopod.     

The clonal composition of biramous and uniramous arthropod limbs

We present the first comparative cell lineage analysis of uniramous and biramous limbs of an arthropod, the crustacean Orchestia cavimana. Via single cell labelling of the cells that are involved in limb development, we are able to present the first complete clonal composition of an arthropod limb. We show that the two main branches of crustacean limbs, exopod and endopod, are formed by a secondary subdivision of the growth zone of the main limb axis. Additional limb outgrowths such as exites result from the establishment of new axes. In contrast to general belief, uniramous limbs in Orchestia are not formed by the loss of the exopod but by suppression of the split into exopod and endopod. Our results offer a developmental approach to discriminate between the different kinds of branches of arthropod appendages. This leads to the conclusion that a 'true' biramous limb comprising an endopod and an exopod might have occurred much later in euarthropod evolution than has previously been thought, probably either in the lineage of the Mandibulata or that of the Tetraconata.     

Larval development of Japanese 'conchostracans': part 1, larval development of Eulimnadia braueriana (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Spinicaudata, Limnadiidae) compared to that of other limnadiids

As a part of a project to compare phylogenetically the larval or embryonic development of all major taxa of the Branchiopoda (Crustacea), the larval development of the Japanese spinicaudatan clam shrimp Eulimnadia braueriana Ishikawa, 1895, is described. Seven naupliar stages are recognized, based mainly on significant morphological differences between them, but in one case, on size alone. The seven stages range in length from 156 µm to 760 µm. Nauplius 1 is nonfeeding with incompletely developed and nonfunctional feeding structures. Nauplius 2 has apparently functional feeding structures, including a well-developed mandibular gnathobase, setulate protopodal endites of the antennae, and setules on various setae involved in swimming and food manipulation. Nauplius 3 is morphologically identical to Nauplius 2, but more than 50% larger. In nauplius 4, the coxal endite (naupliar process) of the antennae develops a bifid tip. Nauplius 5 has a lateral pair of primordial carapace lobes, and the first 4–5 pairs of trunk limb buds are weakly developed, making the anterior part of the trunk wider than the posterior. In nauplius 6, five pairs of trunk limb buds are visible externally and a small carapace has appeared, reaching approximately to trunk limbs 2; also, the pair of large buds behind the mandibles in previous stages has become divided into a large, anterior, setose bud and two smaller, posterior buds. The identities of these structures as either paragnaths or maxillules/maxillae remain uncertain. In nauplius 7, about six pairs of trunk limb buds are visible externally. The general morphology of the nauplius larvae of E. braueriana is much like those of the well-known Limnadia lenticularis (Linnaeus, 1758) and Eulimnadia texana Packard, 1871, including an elongate, lanceolate labrum; however, because of various heterochronies, the correspondence between the larval sequences of these species is not perfect. There is even less correspondence with the 5-stage larval development reported for Limnadia stanleyana King, 1855, and the spatulate labra of that species and Jmnadia spp. are different from those of other known limnadiid nauplii. The larvae of E. braueriana possess many typical (and synapomorphic) branchiopod features, such as the general morphology of the appendages involved in feeding and the mode of trunk limb development, while the small buds of the first antennae and the exact number and development of the parts of the trunk limbs are typical for the Spinicaudata.     

The nature and significance of the appendages of Opabinia from the Middle Cambrian Burgess Shale

Opabinia regalis has long been regarded as a curious animal, with its five eyes, its long flexible anterior process, and gill lamellae carried on the outside of overlapping lateral lobes. More recently, Opabinia has been reconstructed with lobopod limbs lying adaxial but separate from the lateral lobes. This version of Opabinia represented a lobopod–arthropod transition and prompted a hypothesis for the origin of the biramous limb that involved uniting the lobopod limb with a lateral lobe. New evidence of elemental maps is consistent with previous interpretations of the triangular structures in Opabinia as lateral extensions of the gut; there is no convincing evidence for the presence of lobopod limbs. Re-examination of critical specimens reveals that the gill lamellae are not on the outside of the lateral lobes. The limbs of Opabinia resemble the phyllopodous exopod of arthropods; the posterior margin is fringed with blades. Opabinia remains on the stem of euarthropods but not as a part of a paraphyletic Lobopodia. The Lobopodia is a clade of Cambrian armoured lobopods and onychophorans. A new hypothesis for the origin of the arthropod biramous limb from an exopod like that in Opabinia is presented, which involves an endite-bearing phyllopodous limb as an intermediate stage.     

Doxomysis algoaensis, a new mysid species (Crustacea: Mysidacea) from Algoa Bay (South Africa)

Doxomysis algoaensis sp.nov. is described from Algoa Bay, South Africa where it is common in nearshore marine waters just beyond the breaker line. D. algoaensis sp.nov. is morphologically similar to D. australiensis, but can readily be distinguished by the shape and armature of the telson and the length of the exopod of the fourth male pleopod. The apical cleft is one fifth the telson length in the former species and one third the length in D. australiensis. The telson apex on each side of the cleft is also armed with five and four stout spines in the two species, respectively. In D. australiensis, the exopod of the fourth male pleopod is almost three times the length of the endopod; in D. algoaensis sp.nov., the exopod is only slightly longer than the endopod. Other distinctive features of D. algoaensis sp.nov. include the maxillary palp, which is only slightly broader than long and the greater number of spines on the endopod of the uropod.     

Three new species of Hatschekia Poche, 1902 (Copepoda: Siphonostomatoida: Hatschekiidae) parasitic on boxfishes (Pisces: Tetraodontiformes: Aracanidae and Ostraciidae) in Japanese waters

Three new species of Hatschekia Poche, 1902 are described from the gill filaments of three species of boxfishes captured off southern Japan: H. pseudostracii n. sp. on Kentrocapros aculeatus (Houttuyn) (Aracanidae); H. bibullae n. sp. on Lactoria diaphana (Bloch & Schneider) (Ostraciidae); and H. kuroshioensis n. sp. on Tetrosomus concatenates (Bloch) (Ostraciidae). Of the 93 currently valid species in the genus, these new species differ from the 87 species which lack four stout processes on the posterior margin of the intercoxal sclerites of legs 1 and 2. Those processes are present on the remaining six species and the three new species. Of these nine species, H. pseudostracii n. sp. is distinguished by having a T-shaped chitinous frame on the cephalothorax, the leg 1 exopod twice as long as the endopod and a small parabasal papilla. H. bibullae n. sp. can be differentiated by a combination of morphological features as follows: a well-developed, thumb-shaped parabasal papilla, the leg 1 exopod twice as long as the endopod and a trunk lacking posterior lobes. H. kuroshioensis n. sp. can be recognised by bearing a T-shaped chitinous frame on the cephalothorax, the leg 1 exopod is three times as long as the endopod and the trunk lacks posterior lobes.     

A new probable stem lineage crustacean with three-dimensionally preserved soft parts from the Herefordshire (Silurian) Lagerstätte, UK

A new arthropod with three-dimensionally preserved soft parts, Tanazios dokeron, is described from the Wenlock Series (Silurian) of Herefordshire, England, UK. Serial grinding, digital photographic and computer rendering techniques yielded 'virtual fossils' in the round for study. The body tagmata of T. dokeron comprise a head shield and a long trunk. The head shield bears six pairs of horn-like spines and the head bears five pairs of appendages. The antennule, antenna and mandible are all uniramous, and the mandible includes a gnathobasic coxa. Appendages four and five are biramous and similar to those of the trunk: each comprises a limb base with an endite, an enditic membrane, and two epipodites, plus an endopod and exopod. The hypostome bears a large cone-like projection centrally, and there may be a short labrum. The trunk has some 64 segments and at least 60 appendage pairs. A very small telson has the anus sited ventrally in its posterior part and also bears a caudal furca. Comparative morphological and cladistic analyses of T. dokeron indicate a crustacean affinity, with a probable position in the eucrustacean stem group. As such the epipodites in T. dokeron are the first recorded in a eucrustacean stem taxon. The new species is interpreted as a benthic or nektobenthic scavenger.     

The genus Uromunna (Crustacea: Isopoda: Munnidae) in New South Wales,Australia, with a key for all known species

The invertebrate collection of the Australian Museum revealed the existence of three new species of the genus Uromunna (family Munnidae) from New South Wales, Australia. Uromunna tenagoika sp. nov. from Batemans Bay has the head anterior margin concave, without simple setae; eyes with few ommatidia, eye lobes with both margins parallel, in male posterior margin directed forward; pereonite 7 as wide as pereonite 6, subequal to pleotelson width; pleotelson distal margin pointed, suburopodal shelf present; mandible palp absent; pereopod I propodus robust setae absent; pereopods relatively short; pleopod IV exopod distal tip with one pappose seta. Uromunna rhamnda sp. nov. from Batemans Bay has a head anterior margin concave, without simple setae; eye lobes with both margins parallel, in male posterior margin parallel to frontal margin; pleotelson distal margin pointed, suburopodal shelf absent; mandible palp present; pereopod I propodus robust setae absent; pleopod IV exopod distal tip with one pappose seta. Uromunna eora sp. nov. was found at Southern Creek, located north of Sydney and is the first species of the genus described from a fully freshwater environment with no marine water input. It has a relatively elongate body (length 3.4× width), anterior margin concave, eye lobes with both margins converging distally, in male posterior margin directed forward; pereonite 7 as wide as pereonite 6, wider than pleotelson width; pleotelson distal margin truncate, suburopodal shelf present; mandible palp present; pereopod I propodus robust setae present; pleopod IV exopod distal tip with two pappose setae. This work raises the number of Uromunna species found in Australia to a total of six.

http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D877FC47-BC6E-4827-BA89-3A75AFDE1124     

<Emphasis Type="Italic">Foxtosognus rarus</Emphasis> gen. n., sp. n.—A new genus and species of copepods (Copepoda: Calanoida) from the abyssopelagic zone of the Kuril-Kamchatka Trench

A female of Foxtosognus rarus gen. n., sp. n., a new genus and species of copepods, is described from the abyss of the Kuril-Kamchatka Trench. The new genus is placed in the family Arctokonstantinidae, whose diagnosis is emended and supplemented with the following characters: mandibular basis with one to two setae; mandibular endopod one without setae; maxillular distal basal endite plus endopod with two to four setae or without setae. The features that distinguish Foxtosognusgen. n. from other representatives of this family are as follows: mandibular palp with a long endopod segment one, endopod segment two with seven setae, and exopod segment five with two setae; maxillula with distal basal endite lacking setae and separated from endopod bearing three setae; maxillular precoxal arthrite with seven to eight setae and exopod with four setae; maxilliped syncoxa without setae on precoxal endites and endopod of three segments. The genera Sognocalanus and Foxtonia earlier included in the Spinocalanidae are herein transferred to the Arctokonstantinidae.     

On the larval development of<Emphasis Type="Italic"> Eubranchipus grubii</Emphasis> (Crustacea,Branchiopoda, Anostraca), with notes on the basal phylogeny of the Branchiopoda

Selected larval stages of Eubranchipus grubii (Anostraca) from Danish temporary waters are examined by scanning electron microscopy in a phylogenetic context. The study focuses on limb development and body segmentation. It is shown that the large, proximal endite of the trunk limbs in the adult Anostraca is actually a fusion product of two smaller endites which make their appearance in the early larval development. This gives a total of six endites along the inner margin of the trunk limbs. An unsegmented endopod follows more distally. A small additional, seventh endite makes a short appearance in late larvae, but has disappeared in the adults. The naupliar feeding apparatus is of the same type as found in other branchiopods, and has previously been suggested as an autapomorphy for the Branchiopoda. The similarities between the naupliar feeding apparatus of E. grubii and other branchiopods include the presence of a long protopod with a characteristic morphology of the coxal and basipodal masticatory spines/setae, and a three-segmented mandibular palp (basipod and two endopod segments) with a largely similar setation in all taxa. The mode of trunk limb development is also the same as seen in most other recent branchiopods. The phylogenetic significance for the basal phylogeny of the Branchiopoda of these and other morphological features is discussed in relation to the phylogenetic position of two branchiopod fossils, Lepidocaris rhyniensis and Rehbachiella kinnekullensis. While R. kinnekullensis has previously been suggested to be a stem lineage branchiopod, the position of L. rhyniensis is more uncertain. Three different possible phylogenetic positions of L. rhyniensis are discussed: (a) L. rhyniensis as a stem lineage anostracan, (b) L. rhyniensis as a stem lineage branchiopod or (c) L. rhyniensis as a stem lineage phyllopod. It seems most plausible to consider L. rhyniensis a stem lineage anostracan.     

The feeding mechanisms of Lynceus (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Laevicaudata), with special reference to L. simiaefacies Harding

Although generally assumed to be filter feeders, branchiopod crustaceans of the laevicaudatan genus Lynceus O.F. Müller, 1776 possess no filters and do not collect food by filtration. Investigated species of these bivalved, multi‐limbed animals have basically benthic habits and collect particulate food, mostly detritus, by scraping or sweeping it from surfaces with suitably armed trunk limbs. L. simiaefacies Harding, 1941, known only from a desert pool in Yemen, has trunk limbs that are armed with particularly robust scrapers and much of the complexity of these limbs and their armature is related to the collection and manipulation of detrital food by mechanical means. Material collected by scrapers borne distally on the more anterior limbs – although the anteriormost is very lightly armed – is swept posteriorly and dorsally, assisted by the armature of the more proximal endites, towards the posterior end of a deep food groove, whence it is passed anteriorly by the substantial gnathobases of the trunk limbs. The necessary movements of the trunk limbs are facilitated by a system of intrinsic muscles that enable individual endites to be moved independently – a remarkable specialized feature of a phyllopodial appendage. Before it enters the food groove, collected material is at all times confined to a narrow median chamber, or cage, between the two sets of opposed trunk limbs that extends over most of the anterior limbs – which are the largest. Each cage wall serves as a screen, covering the limbs of its side and is made up of long setose screening setae that superficially resemble coarse filter setae, and arise from the more proximal endites of most of the anterior trunk limbs. The screens prevent collected material from entering the inter‐limb spaces into which water flows during each cycle of trunk limb movements, where its presence would be disastrous. They do not interfere with the spines of the proximal endites that can protrude between them. The screens do not extend to the extreme posterior end of the trunk limb series where a complex and dense array of specialized spines of the short posterior trunk limbs completes the task of sweeping food material into the food groove. Material is passed anteriorly along the food groove by the trunk limb gnathobases and the small but robustly armed maxillules to the mandibles. Although constructed on the basic, boat‐like, branchiopod plan, in contrast to those of most particle‐feeding branchiopods whose mandibles have a broad masticatory surface, those of Lynceus have a masticatory surface that is narrow and elongate in the antero‐posterior plane. Interestingly, while the number of ‘teeth’ into which this surface is elaborated is few in most species of the genus, inviting comparison with a similar attribute in the Notostraca, L. simiaefacies has more numerous, smaller teeth. Although following the branchiopod plan, the mandibular musculature appears to have its own distinctive features but remains to be investigated in properly fixed material. At its distal extremity the oesophagus is differentiated into a small but complex gizzard, of which there appears to be no parallel in any other branchiopod order. This is described for the first time. Although provided with natatory antennae, species of Lynceus also employ their trunk limbs as organs of propulsion. In L. gracilicornis (Packard, 1871) the carapace valves can gape to more than 90°, which allows the trunk limbs to make a contribution to propulsion in a manner akin to that of the Anostraca. In this respect the Laevicaudata appears to stand in contrast to the Spinicaudata, in most species of which the trunk limbs contribute little or nothing to locomotion. More information is needed on representatives of both orders, which have received little study as living animals. Brief comments are made on the systematic position of the Laevicaudata, about which much remains to be resolved. © 2009 The Natural History Museum. Journal compilation © 2009 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2009, 155 , 513–541.     

A soft-bodied euarthropod from the early Cambrian Xiaoshiba Lagerstätte of China supports a new clade of basal artiopodans with dorsal ecdysial sutures

We describe the exceptionally well-preserved non-trilobite artiopodan Zhiwenia coronata gen. et sp. nov. from the Cambrian Stage 3 Xiaoshiba Lagerstätte in Yunnan, China. The exoskeleton consists of a cephalic shield with dorsal sutures expressed as lateral notches that accommodate stalked lateral eyes, an elongate trunk composed of 20 tergites—the first of which is reduced—and a short tailspine with marginal spines. Appendicular data include a pair of multi-segmented antennae, and homonomous biramous trunk limbs consisting of an endopod with at least seven podomeres and a flattened exopod with lamellae. Although the presence of cephalic notches and a reduced first trunk tergite invites comparisons with the petalopleurans Xandarella, Luohiniella and Cindarella, the proportions and exoskeletal tagmosis of Zhiwenia do not closely resemble those of any major group within Trilobitomorpha. Parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetic analyses consistently support Zhiwenia as sister-taxon to the Emu Bay Shale artiopodan Australimicola spriggi, and both of them as closely related to Acanthomeridion from the Chengjiang. This new monophyletic clade, Protosutura nov., occupies a basal phylogenetic position within Artiopoda as sister-group to Trilobitomorpha and Vicissicaudata, illuminates the ancestral organization of these successful euarthropods, and leads to a re-evaluation of the evolution of ecdysial dorsal sutures within the group.     

Limb ontogeny and trunk segmentation in Nebalia species (Crustacea, Malacostraca, Leptostraca)

The ’egg-larval’ development of two species of Nebalia has been examined with SEM. Various details concerning limb ontogeny and trunk segmentation are described. The most important of these are the following. The tripartite state of the peduncle of antenna 2 in the adult of Nebalia species is derived from the fusion of the third and fourth podomeres, present in late larvae. The proximal portion of the mandible in the adult of Nebalia brucei, carrying the ’coxal process’, is, based on the ontogenetic evidence, interpreted as the combined basis and coxa, and the bipartite palp is interpreted as the endopod. The early development of the thoracopods and the three anteriormost pleopods is identical. They all start as laterally directed, biramous limb buds. This suggests that tagmatisation of the trunk of the Leptostraca (and other Malacostraca) has been developed from an ancestor with an undivided trunk region with serially similar limbs. Certain early stages reveal an extra, ’eighth’, limbless pleon segment, as compared with the normal number of seven pleomeres of adult Leptostraca. The presence of a row of ventral, sternitic, triangular processes between the bases of the thoracopods, as they are found in certain stages of a species of Nebalia, is suggested as a possible ground pattern for the Malacostraca. Accepted: 1 February 2000     

The larval development of an Australian limnadiid clam shrimp (Crustacea, Branchiopoda, Spinicaudata), and a comparison with other Limnadiidae

The adult morphology of the Australian Limnadopsis shows some remarkable differences to that of other Limnadiidae. These differences are not reflected in its larval development. In Limnadopsis parvispinus, larval development comprises six stages. In stages I and II only the three naupliar appendages are present: the antennule as a small bud, the biramous antenna as the main swimming organ, and the mandible. The antennal protopod bears two endites, the proximal naupliar process and a more distal endite. In stage III a bifid naupliar process (in earlier stages not bifid) and the first signs of the carapace and trunk limb anlagen (undifferentiated rudiments) appear. In stage IV the carapace anlagen become more pronounced. The number of trunk limb anlagens increases to five, and differentiation has commenced. In stage V the first five pairs of trunk limbs are differentiated to varying degrees. The anterior-most four pairs of trunk limbs are subdivided into five endites, a small endopod, an exopod and an epipod. The bivalved carapace covers the anterior-most limbs. In larval stage VI the carapace is larger and the trunk limbs are further differentiated. A general pattern in the sequence of larval stages is the increasing number of sensilla on the antennules. From the last larval to the first postlarval stage, a significant change in morphology takes place. The trunk limbs are now used for swimming. Typical larval organs are much smaller than in the last larval stage. A comparison with other representatives of the Limnadiidae shows a high degree of correspondence, with most differences explained by the heterochronous appearance of characters during development. Five to seven stages are described for all studied Limnadiidae, including one particular stage in which four fully developed setae, a bifid naupliar process and the first signs of carapace anlagen are present. These characters are found in stage III in L. parvispinus, Limnadia stanleyana, Eulimnadia texana, and Imnadia yeyetta but in stage IV in E. braueriana and L. lenticularis. Based on a comparison of the larval stages of six limnadiid and one cyzicid species, we conclude that at least six naupliar stages belong to the limnadiid ground pattern.     

External Anatomy of the Female Genital (Eighth) Limbs and the Setose Openings in Myodocopid Ostracodes (Cypridinidae)

The external anatomy of various cypridinid female genital (8th) limbs is described. Scanning electron microscopy shows that each female cypridinid genital limb has a medial depression and associated pore (= spermatophore pore); over all of which a male cements a spermatophore. The limb terminates laterally in a superficially smooth rounded knob bearing an additional small opening (= lateral pore). Dorsolateral to this genital limb there are grouped setae, previously called "brush organs", that are really paired, slit–like posterolateral openings, which are probably subdermally united to the female genital limbs. The "brush organs" of all myodocopid females also are likely to be the setose openings. The setose openings are probably homologous to the setose central lobe of male cypridinid copulatory limbs, but not homologous to the limb–like "brush organ" described for some podocopid males. We speculate that the eggs are fertilized via the spermatophore pore associated with the attached spermatophore, and that they are released from the slightly larger and more lateral setose openings into the brood chamber of the posterodorsal area of the bivalved carapace.     

Anatomy and lifestyle of Kunmingella (Arthropoda, Bradoriida) from the Chengjiang fossil Lagerstätte (lower Cambrian; Southwest China)

An updated reconstruction of the body plan, functional anatomy and life attitude of the bradoriid arthropod Kunmingella is proposed, based on new fossil specimens with preserved soft parts found in the lower Cambrian of Chengjiang and Haikou (Yunnan, SW China) and on previous evidence. The animal has a single pair of short antennae pointing towards the front (a setal pattern indicates a possible sensory function). The following set of seven appendages (each composed of a 5-segmented endopod and a leaf-like exopod fringed with setae) is poorly differentiated, except the first three pairs (with possible rake-like endopodial outgrowths, smaller exopods) and the last pair of appendages (endopod with longer and more slender podomeres). The endopods are interpreted as walking legs with a possible role in handling food particles (marginal outgrowth with setae). The leaf-like exopods may have had a respiratory function. The trunk end is short, pointed, flanked with furcal-like rami and projects beyond the posterior margin of the carapace. The attachment of the body to the exoskeleton is probably cephalic and apparently lacks any well-developed adductor muscle system. The inferred life attitude of Kunmingella (e.g. crawling on the surface of the sediment) was that of a dorsoventrally flattened arthropod capped by a folded dorsal shield (ventral gape at least 120°), thus resembling the living ostracode Manawa. The animal was also probably able to close its carapace as a response to environmental stress or to survive unfavourable conditions (e.g. buried in sediment). The anterior lobes of the valves are likely to have accommodated visual organs (possibly lensless receptors perceiving ambient light through the translucent head shield). Preserved eggs or embryos suggest a possible ventral brood care. The presence of Kunmingella in coprolites and its numerical abundance in Chengjiang sediment indicate that bradoriids constituted an important source of food for larger predators. Kunmingella differs markedly from the representatives of the crown group Crustacea (extant and Cambrian taxa) and from the stem group derivatives of Crustacea (exemplified by phosphatocopids and some ‘Orsten’ taxa) in showing no major sign of limb specialization (e.g. related to feeding strategies). Although it resembles other Chengjiang euarthropods in important aspects of its body plan (e.g. uniramous antennae, endopod/exopod configuration), Kunmingella possesses several features (e.g. antennal morphology, post-antennular appendages with 5-segmented endopods) which support the view that bradoriids may be very early derivatives of the stem line Crustacea.     

Brain anatomy of the marine tardigrade actinarctus doryphorus (arthrotardigrada)

Knowledge of tardigrade brain structure is important for resolving the phylogenetic relationships of Tardigrada. Here, we present new insight into the morphology of the brain in a marine arthrotardigrade, Actinarctus doryphorus, based on transmission electron microscopy, supported by scanning electron microscopy, conventional light microscopy as well as confocal laser scanning microscopy. Arthrotardigrades contain a large number of plesiomorphic characters and likely represent ancestral tardigrades. They often have segmented body outlines and each trunk segment, with its paired set of legs, may have up to five sensory appendages. Noticeably, the head carries numerous cephalic appendages that are structurally equivalent to the sensory appendages of the trunk segments. Our data reveal that the brain of A. doryphorus is partitioned into three paired lobes, and that these lobes exhibit a more pronounced separation as compared to that of eutardigrades. The first brain lobe in A. doryphorus is located anteriodorsally, with the second lobe just below it in an anterioventral position. Both of these two paired lobes are located anterior to the buccal tube. The third pair of brain lobes are situated posterioventrally to the first two lobes, and flank the buccal tube. In addition, A. doryphorus possesses a subpharyngeal ganglion, which is connected with the first of the four ventral trunk ganglia. The first and second brain lobes in A. doryphorus innervate the clavae and cirri of the head. The innervations of these structures indicate a homology between, respectively, the clavae and cirri of A. doryphorus and the temporalia and papilla cephalica of eutardigrades. The third brain lobes innervate the buccal lamella and the stylets as described for eutardigrades. Collectively, these findings suggest that the head region of extant tardigrades is the result of cephalization of multiple segments. Our results on the brain anatomy of Actinarctus doryphorus support the monophyly of Panarthropoda. J. Morphol. 275:173–190, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

Functional morphology of amplexus (clasping) in spinicaudatan clam shrimps (Crustacea,Branchiopoda) and its evolution in bivalved branchiopods: A video‐based analysis

Male clam shrimps (Crustacea: Branchiopoda: Laevicaudata, Spinicaudata, and Cyclestherida) have their first one or two trunk limb pairs modified as “claspers,” which are used to hold the female during mating and mate guarding. Clasper morphology has traditionally been important for clam shrimp taxonomy and classification, but little is known about how the males actually use the claspers during amplexus (clasping). Homologies of the various clasper parts (“movable finger,” “large palp,” “palm,” “gripping area,” and “small palp”) have long been discussed between the three clam shrimp taxa, and studies have shown that only some structures are homologous while others are convergent (“partial homology”). We studied the clasper functionality in four spinicaudatan species using video recordings and scanning electron microscopy, and compared our results with other clam shrimp groups. General mating behavior and carapace morphology was also studied. Generally, spinicaudatan and laevicaudatan claspers function similarly despite some parts being nonhomologous. We mapped clasper morphology and functionality aspects on a branchiopod phylogeny. We suggest that the claspers of the three groups were adapted from an original, simpler clasper, each for a “stronger” grip on the female's carapace margin: 1) Spinicaudata have two clasper pairs bearing an elongated apical club/gripping area with one setal type; 2); Cyclestherida have one clasper pair with clusters of molariform setae on the gripping area and at the movable finger apex; and 3) Laevicaudata have one clasper pair, but have incorporated an additional limb portion into the clasper palm and bear a diverse set of setae. J. Morphol. 278:523–546, 2017. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.     

A new species of Macrothrix (Anomopoda: Macrothricidae) from Central Mexico

Macrothrix mexicanus sp. nov. is described from central México, a transition zone between the nearctic and neotropics. All localities where it was found are over 1800 meters above sea level. It shows many resemblances with M. laticornis, M. camjatae and M. rosea but is characterized by a persistent dorsal tooth on the valve keel, a spinous papilla on the basipodite of the antenna, the second thoracic limb with a long conical sensillum between scraper 1 and the gnathobase, the endopod of trunk limb IV having two setae; the postabdomen with the dorsal margin bilobed, and the distal segment of the seta natatoria which is unusually long.Abbreviations used on figures EN Endopodite - EP Epipodite - EX Exopodite - IDL Inner distal lobe - ODL Outer distal lobe - GT Gnatobase - E1 Endite 1 - E2 Endite 2 - E3 Endite 3