Tachykinin regulation of cholinergic transmission in the limbic/prefrontal territory of the rat dorsal striatum: implication of new neurokinine 1-sensitive receptor binding site and interaction with enkephalin/mu opioid receptor transmission

The tachykinin neurokinin 1 receptors (NK₁Rs) regulation of acetylcholine release and its interaction with the enkephalin/mu opioid receptors (MORs) transmission was investigated in the limbic/prefrontal (PF) territory of the dorsal striatum. Using double immunohistochemistry, we first showed that in this territory, cholinergic interneurons contain tachykinin NK₁Rs and co-express MORs in the last part of the light period (afternoon). In slices of the striatal limbic/PF territory, following suppression of the dopaminergic inhibitory control of acetylcholine release, application of the tachykinin NK₁R antagonist, SSR240600, markedly reduced the NMDA-induced acetylcholine release in the morning but not in the afternoon when the enkephalin/MOR regulation is operational. In the afternoon, the NK₁R antagonist response required the suppression of the enkephalin/MOR inhibitory control of acetylcholine release by βfunaltrexamine. The pharmacological profile of the tachykinin NK₁R regulation tested by application of the receptor agonists [[Pro⁹]substance P, neurokinin A, neuropeptide K, and substance P(6–11)] and antagonists (SSR240600, GR205171, GR82334, and RP67580) indicated that the subtype of tachykinin NK₁R implicated are the new NK₁-sensitive receptor binding site. Therefore, in the limbic/PF territory of the dorsal striatum, endogenous tachykinin facilitates acetylcholine release via a tachykinin NK₁R subtype. In the afternoon, the tachykinin/NK₁R and the enkephalin/MOR transmissions interact to control cholinergic transmission.     

D2 receptor-mediated inhibition of dopamine release in the rat striatum in vitro is modulated by CB1 receptors: studies using fast cyclic voltammetry

Cannabinoid CB₁ receptors are highly expressed in the striatum where they are known to be co‐localized with dopamine D₂ receptors. There is now strong evidence that cannabinoids modulate dopamine release in the brain. Using fast cyclic voltammetry, single pulse stimulation (0.1 ms; 10 V) was applied every 5 min and peak dopamine release was measured with a carbon fibre microelectrode. Application of the D₂ receptor agonist, quinpirole, inhibited single pulse dopamine overflow in a concentration‐dependent manner (IC₅₀: 3.25 × 10^?8 M). The CB₁ receptor agonist WIN55212‐2 (WIN; 1 μM) had no effect on single pulse dopamine release (93.9 ± 6.6% at 60 min, n = 5) but attenuated the inhibitory effect of quinpirole (30 nM; quinpirole 39.0 ± 4.2% vs. quinpirole + WIN, 48.2 ± 3.7%, n = 5, p < 0.05). This affect was antagonized by the CB₁ receptor anatgonist [N‐(Piperidin‐1‐yl)‐5‐(4‐iodophenyl)‐1‐(2,4‐dichlorophenyl)‐4‐methyl‐1H‐pyrazole‐3‐carboxamide] (AM‐251, 1 μM). Dopamine release evoked by four pulses delivered at 1 Hz (4P1Hz) and 10 pulses delivered at 5 Hz (10P5Hz) was significantly inhibited by WIN [72.3 ± 7.9% control (peak 4 to 1 ratio measurement) and 66.9 ± 3.8% control (area under the curve measurement), respectively, p < 0.05; n = 6 for both]. Prior perfusion of WIN significantly attenuated the effects of quinpirole on multiple pulse‐evoked dopamine release (4P1Hz: quinpirole, 28.4 ± 4.8% vs. WIN + quinpirole, 52.3 ± 1.2%; 10P5Hz: quinpirole, 29.5 ± 1.3% vs. WIN + quinpirole, 59.4 ±7.1%; p < 0.05 for both; n = 6). These effects were also antagonized by AM‐251 (1 μM). This is the first report demonstrating a functional, antagonistic interaction between CB₁ receptors and D₂ autoreceptors in regulating rat striatal dopamine release.