Kinetic studies of ATP synthase: The case for the positional change mechanism

The mitochondrial ATP synthases shares many structural and kinetic properties with bacterial and chloroplast ATP synthases. These enzymes transduce the energy contained in the membrane's electrochemical proton gradients into the energy required for synthesis of high-energy phosphate bonds. The unusual three-fold symmetry of the hydrophilic domain, F₁, of all these synthases is striking. Each F₁ has three identical subunits and three identical subunits as well as three additional subunits present as single copies. The catalytic site for synthesis is undoubtedly contained in the subunit or an , interface, and thus each enzyme appears to contain three identical catalytic sites. This review summarizes recent isotopic and kinetic evidence in favour of the concept, originally proposed by Boyer and coworkers, that energy from the proton gradient is exerted not directly for the reaction at the catalytic site, but rather to release product from a single catalytic site. A modification of this binding change hypotheses is favored by recent data which suggest that the binding change is due to a positional change in all three subunits relative to the remaining subunits of F₁ and F₀ and that the vector of rotation is influenced by energy. The positional change, or rotation, appears to be the slow step in the process of catalysis and it is accelerated in all F₁F₀ ATPases studied by substrate binding and by the proton gradient. However, in the mammalian mitochondrial enzyme, other types of allosteric rate regulation not yet fully elucidated seem important as well.     

ATP Synthases in the Year 2000: Evolving Views about the Structures of These Remarkable Enzyme Complexes

This introductory article briefly summarizes how our views about the structural features ofATP synthases (F₀F₁) have evolved over the past 30 years and also reviews some of our currentviews in the year 2000 about the structures of these remarkably unique enzyme complexes.Suffice it to say that as we approach the end of the first year of this new millinium, we canbe conservatively confident that we have a reasonably good grasp of the overall low-resolutionstructural features of ATP synthases. Electron microscopy techniques, combined with the toolsof biochemistry, molecular biology, and immunology, have played the leading role here byidentifying the headpiece, basepiece, central stalk, side stalk, cap, and in the mitochondrialenzyme, the collar around the central stalk. We can be reasonably confident also that we havea fairly good grasp of much of the high-resolution structural features of both the F₁ moietycomprised of fives subunit types (, , , , and ) and parts of the F₀ moiety comprised ofeither three (E. coli) or at least ten (mitochondria) subunit types. This information acquiredin several different laboratories, either by X-ray crystallography or NMR spectroscopy, includesdetails about the active site and subunit relationships. Moreover, it is consistent with recentlyreported data that the F₁ moiety may be an ATP driven motor, which, during ATP synthesis,is driven in reverse by the electrochemical proton gradient generated by the electron transportchain. The real structural challenges of the future are to acquire at high resolution completeATP synthase complexes representative of different stages of the catalytic cycle during ATPsynthesis and representative also of key regulatory states.     

Evolutionary relationship between Enterobacteriaceae: comparison of the ATP synthases (F1F0) of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae

The ATP synthase complex of Klebsiella pneumoniae (KF₁F₀) has been purified and characterized. SDS-gel electrophoresis of the purified F₁F₀ complexes revealed an identical subunit pattern for E. coli (EF₁F₀) and K. pneumoniae. Antibodies raised against EF₁ complex and purified EF₀ subunits recognized the corresponding polypeptides of EF₁F₀ and KF₁F₀ in immunoblot analysis. Protease digestion of the individual subunits generated an identical cleavage pattern for subunits , , , , a, and c of both enzymes. Only for subunit different cleavage products were obtained. The isolated subunit c of both organisms showed only a slight deviation in the amino acid composition. These data suggest that extensive homologies exist in primary and secondary structure of both ATP synthase complexes reflecting a close phylogenetic relationship between the two enterobacteric tribes.Abbreviations ACMA 9-amino-6-chloro-2-methoxyacridine - DCCD N,N-dicyclohexylcarbodiimide - FITC fluorescein isothiocyanate - SDS sodium dodecyl sulfate - TTFB 4,5,6,7-tetrachloro-2-trifluoromethylbenzimidazole     

ATP synthases: insights into their motor functions from sequence and structural analyses

ATP synthases are motor complexes comprised of F₀ and F₁ parts that couple the proton gradient across the membrane to the synthesis of ATP by rotary catalysis. Although a great deal of information has been accumulated regarding the structure and function of ATP synthases, their motor functions are not fully understood. For this reason, we performed the alignments and analyses of the protein sequences comprising the core of the ATP synthase motor complex, and examined carefully the locations of the conserved residues in the subunit structures of ATP synthases. A summary of the findings from this bioinformatic study is as follows. First, we found that four conserved regions in the sequence of subunit are clustered into three patches in its structure. The interactions of these conserved patches with the and subunits are likely to be critical for energy coupling and catalytic activity of the ATP synthase. Second, we located a four-residue cluster at the N-terminal domain of mitochondrial OSCP or bacterial (or chloroplast) subunit which may be critical for the binding of these subunits to F₁. Third, from the localizations of conserved residues in the subunits comprising the rotors of ATP synthases, we suggest that the conserved interaction site at the interface of subunit c and (mitochondria) or (bacteria and chloroplasts) may be important for connecting the rotor of F₁ to the rotor of F₀. Finally, we found the sequence of mitochondrial subunit b to be highly conserved, significantly longer than bacterial subunit b, and to contain a shorter dimerization domain than that of the bacterial protein. It is suggested that the different properties of mitochondrial subunit b may be necessary for interaction with other proteins, e.g., the supernumerary subunits.     

Inhibitory Mg-ADP—Fluoroaluminate Complexes Bound to Catalytic Sites of F1-ATPases: Are They Ground-State or Transition-State Analogs?

Schemes are proposed for coupling sequential opening and closing the three catalytic sites of F₁ to rotation of the subunit during ATP synthesis and hydrolysis catalyzed by the F_oF₁-ATP synthase. A prominent feature of the proposed mechanisms is that the transition state during ATP synthesis is formed when a catalytic site is in the process of closing and that the transition state during ATP hydrolysis is formed when a catalytic site is in the process of opening. The unusual kinetics of formation of Mg-ADP—fluoroaluminate complexes in one or two catalytic sites of nucleotide-depleted MF₁ and wild-type and mutant ₃₃ subcomplexes of TF₁ are also reviewed. From these considerations, it is concluded that Mg-ADP—fluoroaluminate complexes formed at catalytic sites of isolated F₁-ATPases or F₁ in membrane-bound F_oF₁ are ground-state analogs.     

Subunit Organization of the Stator Part of the F 0 Complex from Escherichia coli ATP Synthase

Membrane-bound ATP synthases (F₁F₀) catalyze the synthesis of ATP via a rotary catalyticmechanism utilizing the energy of an electrochemical ion gradient. The transmembrane potentialis supposed to propel rotation of a subunit c ring of F₀ together with subunits and of F₁,hereby forming the rotor part of the enzyme, whereas the remainder of the F₁F₀ complexfunctions as a stator for compensation of the torque generated during rotation. This reviewfocuses on our recent work on the stator part of the F₀ complex, e.g., subunits a and b. Usingepitope insertion and antibody binding, subunit a was shown to comprise six transmembranehelixes with both the N- and C-terminus oriented toward the cytoplasm. By use of circulardichroism (CD) spectroscopy, the secondary structure of subunit b incorporated intoproteoliposomes was determined to be 80% -helical together with 14% turn conformation, providingflexibility to the second stalk. Reconstituted subunit b together with isolated ac subcomplexwas shown to be active in proton translocation and functional F₁ binding revealing the nativeconformation of the polypeptide chain. Chemical crosslinking in everted membrane vesiclesled to the formation of subunit b homodimers around residues bQ37 to bL65, whereas bA32Ccould be crosslinked to subunit a, indicating a close proximity of subunits a and b near themembrane. Further evidence for the proposed direct interaction between subunits a and b wasobtained by purification of a stable ab ₂ subcomplex via affinity chromatography using Histags fused to subunit a or b. This ab ₂ subcomplex was shown to be active in proton translocationand F₁ binding, when coreconstituted with subunit c. Consequences of crosslink formationand subunit interaction within the F₁F₀ complex are discussed.     

Molecular switch of F0F1-ATP synthase,G-protein,and other ATP-driven enzymes

Exchange-out of amide tritium from labeled -subunit of ₃₃ complex of F₀F₁-ATP synthase was not accelerated by ATP, suggesting that hemagglutinin-type transition of coiled-coil structure did not occur in -subunit. Local topology of nucleotide binding site and switch II region of G-protein resemble those of F₁- subunit and other proteins which catalyze ATP-triggered reactions. Probably, binding of nucleotide to F₀F₁-ATP synthase induces conformational change of the switch II-like region with transforming subunit structure from open to closed form and this transformation results in loss of hydrogen bonds with the subunit, thus enabling the subunit to move.     

Temperature-sensitive coupling and uncoupling of ATPase-mediated,nonradiative energy dissipation: Similarities between chloroplasts and leaves

The effects of temperature on the dark relaxation kinetics of nonradiative energy dissipation in photosystem II were compared in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) chloroplasts and leaves of Aegialitis annulata R. Br. After high levels of violaxanthin de-epoxidation in the light, Aegialitis leaves showed a marked delay in the dark relaxation of nonradiative dissipation, measured as non-photochemical quenching (NPQ) of photosystem II chlorophyll a fluorescence. Aegialitis leaves also maintained a moderately high adenylate energy charge at low temperatures during and after high-light exposure, presumably because of their limited carbon-fixation capacity. Similarly, dark-sustained NPQ could be induced in lettuce chloroplasts after de-epoxidizing violaxanthin and light-activating the ATP synthase. The duration and extent of dark-sustained NPQ were strongly enhanced by low temperatures in both chloroplasts and leaves. Further, the NPQ sustained at low temperatures was rapidly reversed upon warming. In lettuce chloroplasts, low temperatures sharply decreased the ATP-hydrolysis rate while increasing the duration and extent of the resultant trans-thylakoid proton gradient that elicits the NPQ. This was consistent with a higher degree of energy-coupling, presumably due to reduced proton diffusion through the thylakoid membrane at the lower temperatures. The chloroplast adenylate pool was in equilibrium with the adenylate kinase and therefore both ATP and ADP contributed to reverse coupling. The low-temperature-enhanced NPQ quenched the yields of the dark level (F_o) and the maximal (F_m) fluorescence proportionally in both chloroplasts and leaves. The extent of NPQ in the dark was inversely related to the efficiency of photosystem II, and very similar linear relationships were obtained over a wide temperature range in both chloroplasts and leaves. Likewise, the dark-sustained absorbance changes, caused by violaxanthin de-epoxidation (A_508nm) and energy-dependent light scattering (A_536nm) were strikingly similar in chloroplasts and leaves. Therefore, we conclude that the dark-sustained, low-temperature-stimulated NPQ in chloroplasts and leaves is apparently directly dependent on lumen acidification and chloroplastic ATP hydrolysis. In leaves, the ATP required for sustained NPQ is evidently provided by oxidative phosphorylation in the mitochondria. The functional significance of this quenching process and implications for measurements of photo-protection versus photodamage in leaves are discussed.Abbreviations and Symbols A antheraxanthin - Chl chlorophyll - DPS de-epoxidation state of the xanthophyll cycle, ([Z+A]/[V+A+Z]) - F, F steady-state fluorescence in the absence, presence of thylakoid energization - F_o, F_o dark fluorescence level in the absence, presence of thylakoid energization - F_m, F_m maximal fluorescence in absence, presence of thylakoid energization - NPQ nonphotochemical quenching (F_m/F_m)–1 - V violaxanthin - Z zeaxanthin - NRD nonradiative dissipation - PFD photon flux density - [2ATP+ADP] - pH trans-thylakoid proton gradient - S pH-dependent light scattering - _PSII (F_m–F)/F_m, photon yield of PSII photochemistry at the actual reduction state in the light or dark - [ATP+ADP+AMP] We thank Connie Shih for skillful assistance in growing plants and for conducting HPLC analyses. Support from an NSF/USDA/DOE postdoctoral training grant to A.G. is gratefully acknowledged. A.G. also wishes to thank Prof. Govindjee for valuable discussions. C.I.W.-D.P.B. Publication No. 1197.     

ATP Synthases in the Year 2000: Defining the Different Levels of Mechanism and Getting a Grip on Each

ATP synthases are unusually complex molecules, which fractionate most readily into two major units, one a water soluble unit called F₁ and the other a detergent soluble unit called F₀. In almost all known species the F₁ unit consists of 5 subunit types in the stoichiometric ratio ₃₃ while the F₀ unit contains 3 subunit types (a, b, and c) in E. coli, and at least 10 subunit types (a, b, c, and others) in higher animals. It is now believed by many investigators that during the synthesis of ATP, protons derived from an electrochemical gradient generated by an electron transport chain are directed through the F₀ unit in such a way as to drive the rotation of the single subunit, which extends from an oligomeric ring of at least 10 c subunits in F₀ through the center of F₁. It is further believed by many that the rotating subunit, by interacting sequentially with the 3 pairs of F₁ (360° cycle) in the presence of ADP, P_i, and Mg⁺⁺, brings about via power strokes conformational/binding changes in these subunits that promote the synthesis of ATP and its release on each pair. In support of these views, studies in several laboratories either suggest or demonstrate that F₀ consists in part of a proton gradient driven motor while F₁ consists of an ATP hydrolysis driven motor, and that the subunit does rotate during F₁ function. Therefore, current implications are that during ATP synthesis the former motor drives the latter in reverse via the subunit. This would suggest that the process of understanding the mechanism of ATP synthases can be subdivided into three major levels, which include elucidating those chemical and/or biophysical events involved in (1) inducing rotation of the subunit, (2) coupling rotation of this subunit to conformational/binding changes in each of the 3 pairs, and (3) forming ATP and water (from ADP, P_i, and Mg⁺⁺) and then releasing these products from each of the 3 catalytic sites. Significantly, it is at the final level of mechanism where the bond breaking/making events of ATP synthesis occur in the transition state, with the former two levels of mechanism setting the stage for this critical payoff event. Nevertheless, in order to get a better grip in this new century on how ATP synthases make ATP and then release it, we must take on the difficult challenge of elucidating each of the three levels of mechanism.     

Structure of theEscherichia coli ATP synthase and role of the γ and ε subunits in coupling catalytic site and proton channeling functions

The structure of theEscherichia coli ATP synthase has been studied by electron microscopy and a model developed in which the and subunits of the F₁ part are arranged hexagonally (in top view) alternating with one another and surrounding a central cavity of around 35 Å at its widest point. The and subunits are interdigitated in side view for around 60 Å of the 90 Å length of the molecule. The F₁ narrows and has three-fold symmetry at the end furthest from the F₀ part. The F₁ is linked to F₀ by a stalk approximately 45 Å long and 25–30 Å in diameter. The F₀ part is mostly buried in the lipid bilayer. The subunit provides a domain that extends into the central cavity of the F₁ part. The and subunits are in a different conformation when ATP+Mg²⁺ are present in catalytic sites than when ATP+EDTA are present. This is consistent with these two small subunits switching conformations as a function of whether or not phosphate is bound to the enzyme at the position of the phosphate of ATP. We suggest that this switching is the key to the coupling of catalytic site events with proton translocation in the F₀ part of the complex.     

The photosynthetic F1-α3β3 and α1β1 catalytic core complexes

Minimal photosynthetic catalytic F₁() core complexes, containing equimolar ratios of the and subunits, were isolated from membrane-bound spinach chloroplast CF₁ and Rhodospirillum rubrum chromatophore RrF₁. A CF₁-₃₃ hexamer and RrF₁-₁₁ dimer, which were purified from the respective F₁() complexes, exhibit lower rates and different properties from their parent F₁-ATPases. Most interesting is their complete resistance to inhibition by the general F₁ inhibitor azide and the specific CF₁ inhibitor tentoxin. These inhibitors were earlier reported to inhibit multisite, but not unisite, catalysis in all sensitive F₁-ATPases and were therefore suggested to block catalytic site cooperativity. The absence of this typical property of all F₁-ATPases in the ₁₁ dimer is consistant with the view that the dimer contains only a single catalytic site. The ₃₃ hexamer contains however all F₁ catalytic sites. Therefore the observation that CF₁-₃₃ can bind tentoxin and is stimulated by it suggests that the F₁ subunit, which is required for obtaining inhibition by tentoxin as well as azide, plays an important role in the cooperative interactions between the F₁-catalytic sites.Abbreviations CF₀F₁ chloroplast F₀F₁ - CF₁ chloroplast F₁ - CF₁ chloroplast F₁ subunit - CF₁ chloroplast F₁ subunit - CF₁() a complex containing equal amounts of the CF₁ and subunits - MF₁ mitochondrial F₁ - RrF₀F₁ Rhodospirillum rubrum F₀F₁ - RrF₁ R. rubrum F₁ - RrF₁ R. rubrum F₁ subunit - RrF₁ R. rubrum F₁ subunit - RrF₁() a complex containing equal amounts of the RrF₁ and subunits - Rubisco Ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase - TF₁ thermophilic bacterium PS3 F₁     

The chloroplast ATP synthase: Structural changes during catalysis

This article summarizes some of the evidence for the existence of light-driven structural changes in the and subunits of the chlorplast ATP synthase. Formation of a transmembrane proton gradient results in: (1) a change in the position of the subunit such that it becomes exposed to polyclonal antibodies and to reagents which selectively modifyLys109; (2) enhanced solvent accessibility of several sulfhydryl residues on the subunit; and (3) release/ exchange of tightly bound ADP from the enzyme. These and related experimental observations can, at least partially, be explained in terms of two different bound conformational states of the subunit. Evidence for structural changes in the enzyme which are driven by light or nucleotide binding is discussed with special reference to the popular rotational model for catalysis.     

Chemical modification of active sites in relation to the catalytic mechanism of F1

Recent studies of chemically modified F₁-ATPases have provided new information that requires a revision of our thinking on their catalytic mechanism. One of the subunits in F₁-ATPase is distinguishable from the other two both structurally and functionally. The catalytic site and regulatory site of the same subunit are probably sufficiently close to each other, and the interaction between the various catalytic and regulatory sites are probably sufficiently strong to raise the uni-site rate of ATP hydrolysis by several orders of magnitude to that of promoted (multi-site) ATP hydrolysis. Although all three subunits in F₁ possess weak uni-site ATPase activity, only one of them () catalyzes promoted ATP hydrolysis. But all three subunits catalyze ATP synthesis driven by the proton flux. Internal rotation of the ₃₃ or ₃ moiety relative to the remainder of the F₀F₁ complex did not occur during oxidative phosphorylation by reconstituted submitochondrial particles.     

Notes on the Mechanism of ATP Synthesis

The most commonly quoted mechanism of the coupling between the electrochemical proton gradient and the formation of ATP from ADP and P_i assumes that all states of the F₁ portion of the ATP synthase have subunits in tight, loose, and open conformations. Models based on this assumption are inconsistent with some of the available experimental evidence. A mechanism that includes an additional subunit conformation, closed, observed in the rat liver structure overcomes these difficulties.     

Hypothyroidism Leads to a Decreased Expression of Mitochondrial F0F1-ATP Synthase in Rat Liver

In liver mitochondria isolated from hypothyroid rats, the rate of ATP synthesis is lower than in mitochondria from normal rats. Oligomycin-sensitive ATP hydrolase activity and passive proton permeability were significantly lower in submitochondrial particles from hypothyroid rats compared to those isolated from normal rats. In mitochondria from hypothyroid rats, the changes in catalytic activities of F₀F₁-ATP synthase are accompanied by a decrease in the amount of immunodetected -F₁, F₀1-PVP, and OSCP subunits of the complex. Northern blot hybridization shows a decrease in the relative cytosolic content of mRNA for -F₁ subunit in liver of hypothyroid rats. Administration of 3,5,3-triodo-L-thyronine to the hypothyroid rats tends to remedy the functional and structural defects of F₀F₁-ATP synthase observed in the hypothyroid rats. The results obtained indicate that hypothyroidism leads to a decreased expression of F₀F₁-ATP synthase complex in liver mitochondria and this contributes to the decrease of the efficiency of oxidative phosphorylation.     

Modulation at a Distance of Proton Conductance through the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mitochondrial F1F0-ATP Synthase by Variants of the Oligomycin Sensitivity-Conferring Protein Containing Substitutions near the C-Terminus

We have sought to elucidate how the oligomycin sensitivity-conferring protein (OSCP) of the mitochondrial F₁F₀-ATP synthase (mtATPase) can influence proton channel function. Variants of OSCP, from the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, having amino acid substitutions at a strictly conserved residue (Gly166) were expressed in place of normal OSCP. Cells expressing the OSCP variants were able to grow on nonfermentable substrates, albeit with some increase in generation time. Moreover, these strains exhibited increased sensitivity to oligomycin, suggestive of modification in functional interactions between the F₁ and F₀ sectors mediated by OSCP. Bioenergetic analysis of mitochondria from cells expressing OSCP variants indicated an increased respiratory rate under conditions of no net ATP synthesis. Using specific inhibitors of mtATPase, in conjunction with measurement of changes in mitochondrial transmembrane potential, it was revealed that this increased respiratory rate was a result of increased proton flux through the F₀ sector. This proton conductance, which is not coupled to phosphorylation, is exquisitely sensitive to inhibition by oligomycin. Nevertheless, the oxidative phosphorylation capacity of these mitochondria from cells expressing OSCP variants was no different to that of the control. These results suggest that the incorporation of OSCP variants into functional ATP synthase complexes can display effects in the control of proton flux through the F₀ sector, most likely mediated through altered protein—protein contacts within the enzyme complex. This conclusion is supported by data indicating impaired stability of solubilized mtATPase complexes that is not, however, reflected in the assembly of functional enzyme complexes in vivo. Given a location for OSCP atop the F₁-₃₃ hexamer that is distant from the proton channel, then the modulation of proton flux by OSCP must occur at a distance. We consider how subtle conformational changes in OSCP may be transmitted to F₀.     

The Structural and Functional Connection between the Catalytic and Proton Translocating Sectors of the Mitochondrial F 1 F 0 -ATP Synthase

The structural and functional connection between the peripheral catalytic F₁ sector and theproton-translocating membrane sector F₀ of the mitochondrial ATP synthase is reviewed. Theobservations examined show that the N-terminus of subunit , the carboxy-terminal and centralregion of F₀I-PVP(b), OSCP, and part of subunit d constitute a continuous structure, the lateralstalk, which connects the peripheries of F₁ to F₀ and surrounds the central element of thestalk, constituted by subunits and . The ATPase inhibitor protein (IF₁) binds at one sideof the F₁F₀ connection. The carboxy-terminal segment of IF₁ apparently binds to OSCP. The42L-58K segment of IF₁, which is per se the most active domain of the protein, binds at thesurface of one of the three / pairs of F₁, thus preventing the cyclic interconversion of thecatalytic sites required for ATP hydrolysis.     

Unisite Hydrolysis of [γ32P]ATP by Soluble Mitochondrial F1ATPase and Its Release by Excess ADP and ATP. Effect of Trifluoperazine

Some of the characteristics of unisite hydrolysis of [³²P]ATP as well as the changes that occur on the transition to multisite catalysis were further studied. It was found that a fraction of [³²P]ATP bound at the catalytic sites of F₁ under unisite conditions undergoes both hydrolysis and release induced by medium nucleotides upon addition of millimolar concentrations of ADP or ATP. The fraction of [³²P]ATP that undergoes release is similar to the fraction that undergoes hydrolytic cleavage, indicating that the rates of the release and hydrolytic reactions of bound [³²P]ATP are in the same range. As part of studies on the mechanisms through which trifluoperazine inhibits ATP hydrolysis, its effect on unisite hydrolysis of [³²P]ATP was also studied. Trifluoperazine diminishes the rate of unisite hydrolysis by 30–40%. The inhibition is accompanied by a nearly tenfold increase in the ratio of [³²P]ATP/³²Pi bound at the catalytic site and a 50% diminution in the rate of ³²Pi release from the enzyme into the media. Trifluoperazine also induces heterogeneity of the three catalytic sites of F₁ in the sense that in a fraction of F₁ molecules, the high-affinity catalytic site has a turnover rate lower than the other two. Trifluoperazine does not modify the release of previously bound [³²P]ATP induced by medium nucleotides. The latter indicates that hindrances in the release of Pi do not necesarily accompany alterations in the release of ATP even though both species lie in the same site.     

The α/β Interfaces of α1β1, α3β3, and F1: Domain Motions and Elastic Energy Stored during γ Rotation

ATP synthase (F_oF₁) consists of F₁ (ATP-driven motor) and F_o (H⁺-driven motor). F₁ is a complex of ₃₃ subunits, and is the rotating cam in ₃₃. Thermophilic F₁ (TF₁) is exceptional in that it can be crystallized as a monomer and an ₃₃ oligomer, and it is sufficiently stable to allow refolding and reassembly of hybrid complexes containing 1, 2, and 3 modified or . The nucleotide-dependent open–close conversion of conformation is an inherent property of an isolated and energy and signals are transferred through / interfaces. The catalytic and noncatalytic interfaces of both mitochondrial F₁ (MF₁) and TF₁ were analyzed by an atom search within the limits of 0.40 nm across the interfaces. Seven (plus thermophilic loop in TF₁) contact areas are located at both the catalytic and noncatalytic interfaces on the open form. The number of contact areas on closed increased to 11 and 9, respectively, in the catalytic and noncatalytic interfaces. The interfaces in the barrel domain are immobile. The torsional elastic strain applied through the mobile areas is concentrated in hinge residues and the P-loop in . The notion of elastic energy in F_oF₁ has been revised. X-ray crystallography of F₁ is a static snap shot of one state and the elastic hypotheses are still inconsistent with the structure, dyamics, and kinetics of F_oF₁. The domain motion and elastic energy in F_oF₁ will be elucidated by time-resolved crystallography.     

ATP synthases—Structure of the F1-moiety and its relationship to function and mechanism

A great deal of progress has been made in understanding both the structure and the mechanism of F₁-ATPase. The primary structure is now fully known for at least five species. Sequence comparison between chloroplast, photobacteria, aerobic bacteria, and mitochondrial representatives allow us to infer more general functional relationships and evolutionary trends. Although the F₁ moiety is the most studied segment of the H⁺-ATPase complex, there is not a full understanding of the mechanism and regulation of its hydrolytic activity. The subunit is now known to contain one and probably two nucleotide binding domains, one of which is believed to be a catalytic site. Recently, two similar models have been proposed to attempt to describe the active part of the subunits. These models are mainly an attempt to use the structure of adenylate kinase to represent a more general working model for nucleotide binding phosphotransferases. Labelling experiments seem to indicate that several critical residues outside the region described by the adenylate kinase part of this model are also actively involved in the ATPase activity. New models will have to be introduced to include these regions. Finally, it seems that a consensus has been reached with regard to a broad acceptance of the asymmetric structure of the F₁-moiety. In addition, recent experimental evidence points toward the presence of nonequivalent subunits to describe the functional activity of the F₁-ATPase. A summary diagram of the conformational and binding states of the enzyme including the nonequivalent subunit is presented. Additional research is essential to establish the role of the minor subunits—and of the asymmetry they introduce in F₁—on the physiological function of the enzyme.