Telomere loss in somatic cells of Drosophila causes cell cycle arrest and apoptosis

Checkpoint mechanisms that respond to DNA damage in the mitotic cell cycle are necessary to maintain the fidelity of chromosome transmission. These mechanisms must be able to distinguish the normal telomeres of linear chromosomes from double-strand break damage. However, on several occasions, Drosophila chromosomes that lack their normal telomeric DNA have been recovered, raising the issue of whether Drosophila is able to distinguish telomeric termini from nontelomeric breaks. We used site-specific recombination on a dispensable chromosome to induce the formation of a dicentric chromosome and an acentric, telomere-bearing, chromosome fragment in somatic cells of Drosophila melanogaster. The acentric fragment is lost when cells divide and the dicentric breaks, transmitting a chromosome that has lost a telomere to each daughter cell. In the eye imaginal disc, cells with a newly broken chromosome initially experience mitotic arrest and then undergo apoptosis when cells are induced to divide as the eye differentiates. Therefore, Drosophila cells can detect and respond to a single broken chromosome. It follows that transmissible chromosomes lacking normal telomeric DNA nonetheless must possess functional telomeres. We conclude that Drosophila telomeres can be established and maintained by a mechanism that does not rely on the terminal DNA sequence.     

Multiple pathways suppress telomere addition to DNA breaks in the Drosophila germline

Telomeres protect chromosome ends from being repaired as double-strand breaks (DSBs). Just as DSB repair is suppressed at telomeres, de novo telomere addition is suppressed at the site of DSBs. To identify factors responsible for this suppression, we developed an assay to monitor de novo telomere formation in Drosophila, an organism in which telomeres can be established on chromosome ends with essentially any sequence. Germline expression of the I-SceI endonuclease resulted in precise telomere formation at its cut site with high efficiency. Using this assay, we quantified the frequency of telomere formation in different genetic backgrounds with known or possible defects in DNA damage repair. We showed that disruption of DSB repair factors (Rad51 or DNA ligase IV) or DSB sensing factors (ATRIP or MDC1) resulted in more efficient telomere formation. Interestingly, partial disruption of factors that normally regulate telomere protection (ATM or NBS) also led to higher frequencies of telomere formation, suggesting that these proteins have opposing roles in telomere maintenance vs. establishment. In the ku70 mutant background, telomere establishment was preceded by excessive degradation of DSB ends, which were stabilized upon telomere formation. Most strikingly, the removal of ATRIP caused a dramatic increase in telomeric retrotransposon attachment to broken ends. Our study identifies several pathways that suppress telomere addition at DSBs, paving the way for future mechanistic studies.     

Recognition of Double Strand Breaks by a Mutator Protein (MU2) in Drosophila melanogaster

Telomere capture, a rare event that stabilizes chromosome breaks, is associated with certain genetic abnormalities in humans. Studies pertaining to the generation, maintenance, and biological effects of telomere formation are limited in metazoans. A mutation, mu2^a, in Drosophila melanogaster decreases the rate of repair of double strand DNA breaks in oocytes, thus leading to chromosomes that have lost a natural telomere and gained a new telomere. Amino acid sequence, domain architecture, and protein interactions suggest that MU2 is an ortholog of human MDC1. The MU2 protein is a component of meiotic recombination foci and localizes to repair foci in S2 cells after irradiation in a manner similar to that of phosphorylated histone variant H2Av. Domain searches indicated that the protein contains an N-terminal FHA domain and a C-terminal tandem BRCT domain. Peptide pull-down studies showed that the BRCT domain interacts with phosphorylated H2Av, while the FHA domain interacts with the complex of MRE11, RAD50, and NBS. A frameshift mutation that eliminates the MU2 BRCT domain decreases the number and size of meiotic phospho-H2Av foci. MU2 is also required for the intra-S checkpoint in eye-antennal imaginal discs. MU2 participates at an early stage in the recognition of DNA damage at a step that is prerequisite for both DNA repair and cell cycle checkpoint control. We propose a model suggesting that neotelomeres may arise when radiation-induced chromosome breaks fail to be repaired, fail to arrest progression through meiosis, and are deposited in the zygote, where cell cycle control is absent and rapid rounds of replication and telomere formation ensue.     

HipHop interacts with HOAP and HP1 to protect Drosophila telomeres in a sequence‐independent manner

Telomeres prevent chromosome ends from being repaired as double‐strand breaks (DSBs). Telomere identity in Drosophila is determined epigenetically with no sequence either necessary or sufficient. To better understand this sequence‐independent capping mechanism, we isolated proteins that interact with the HP1/ORC‐associated protein (HOAP) capping protein, and identified HipHop as a subunit of the complex. Loss of one protein destabilizes the other and renders telomeres susceptible to fusion. Both HipHop and HOAP are enriched at telomeres, where they also interact with the conserved HP1 protein. We developed a model telomere lacking repetitive sequences to study the distribution of HipHop, HOAP and HP1 using chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP). We discovered that they occupy a broad region >10 kb from the chromosome end and their binding is independent of the underlying DNA sequence. HipHop and HOAP are both rapidly evolving proteins yet their telomeric deposition is under the control of the conserved ATM and Mre11–Rad50–Nbs (MRN) proteins that modulate DNA structures at telomeres and at DSBs. Our characterization of HipHop and HOAP reveals functional analogies between the Drosophila proteins and subunits of the yeast and mammalian capping complexes, implicating conservation in epigenetic capping mechanisms.     

Asp-Ala-His-Lys (DAHK) inhibits copper-induced oxidative DNA double strand breaks and telomere shortening

Both DNA and the telomeric sequence are susceptible to copper-mediated reactive oxygen species (ROS) damage, particularly damage attributed to hydroxyl radicals. In this study, ROS-induced DNA double strand breaks and telomere shortening were produced by exposure to copper and ascorbic acid. Asp-Ala-His-Lys (DAHK), a specific copper chelating tetrapeptide d-analog of the N-terminus of human albumin, attenuated DNA strand breaks in a dose dependent manner. d-DAHK, at a ratio of 4:1 (d-DAHKCu), provided complete protection of isolated DNA from double strand breaks and, at a ratio of 2:1 (d-DAHKCu), completely protected DNA in Raji cells exposed to copper/ascorbate. Southern blots of DNA treated with copper/ascorbate showed severe depletion and shortening of telomeres and Raji cell treated samples showed some conservation of telomere sequences. d-DAHK provided complete telomere length protection at a ratio of 2:1 (d-DAHKCu). The human albumin N-terminus analog, d-DAHK, protects DNA and telomeres against copper-mediated ROS damage and may be a useful therapeutic adjunct in ROS disease processes.     

Hela细胞端粒DNA断裂损伤

Telomeres are the repetitive G-rich DNA sequences at the end of chromosomes and shorten at each round of cell division.Besides the incomplete DNA synthesis,single and double DNA strand breaks,if not repaired, also contribute to the telomere shortening.To assess the frequency of strand breaks in proliferating Hela cells,telomere fragments were released by alkaline denaturing and electrophoresis from cells embedded in agarose,blotted onto membrane,and detected by probe specific to telomere sequence.The quantity of telomere fragments released was estimated to be less than 0.4% of the total telomere content,which corresponded to less than one break per cell.Since the mean length of the terminal restriction fragments of the cells was about 7 kbp,the fragments detected would lead to less than 19 bp in mean telomere shortening [Acta Zoologica Sinica 49(6):873-877,2003].     

细胞DNA损伤检控系统在维持端粒稳定中的功能

真核生物的DNA损伤检控系统是维持细胞基因组稳定的一个重要机制,该系统能检测细胞在生命活动过程中出现的DNA损伤并引发细胞周期阻滞,对DNA损伤进行修复,以维持细胞遗传的稳定性。端粒是位于真核细胞染色体末端由重复DNA序列和蛋白质组成的复合物,具有保护染色体、介导染色体复制、引导减数分裂时的同源染色体配对和调节细胞衰老等作用。虽然端粒与DNA双链断裂都具有作为线性染色体末端的共同特点,但正常端粒并不像DNA双链断裂那样激活DNA损伤检控系统。另一方面,端粒又与DNA损伤相似,因为多种DNA损伤检控蛋白在端粒长度稳定中起重要作用。因此DNA损伤检控系统既参与了维持正常端粒的完整性,又可对端粒损伤作出应答。现就DNA损伤检控系统在维持端粒稳定中的作用及其对功能缺陷端粒的应答作一简要综述。     

Frequency of telomere repeat units in the Drosophila miranda genome

Cloned DNA fragments of Drosophila miranda which label all chromosome ends show a basic tandem repeat unit of 4.4 kb. The D. miranda telomere specific tandem repeats do not cross-hybridize with genomic D. melanogaster DNA which itself contains telomere repeat units of 3 kb. For a more detailed analysis of the functional criteria of telomere specific sequences we determined the repetition frequency of the tandem repeat units. As a low estimate we found a repetition frequency of 20 for female D. miranda DNA. This is on average equivalent to 2 telomere repeat units per chromosome end in the female D. miranda karyotype. However, a variable number of tandem repeat units per chromosome end would describe more closely the obtained differences in the labeling intensity between the individual chromosomes (X¹L-5). For the D. miranda male DNA we determined a repetition frequency of 90. The frequency difference of 70 copies between male and female DNA must be due to the Y-chromosome.     

Telomeres: not all breaks are equal

ATM, Rad50 and Mre11 have been shown to prevent telomere fusion in Drosophila, thereby extending the protective role of DNA damage checkpoint proteins to non-canonical telomeres formed without telomerase. How do these proteins help chromosomal termini escape fusion through 'repair' while promoting repair of induced DNA breaks?     

Cdc13 telomere capping decreases Mec1 association but does not affect Tel1 association with DNA ends

Chromosome ends, known as telomeres, have to be distinguished from DNA breaks that activate DNA damage checkpoint. Two large protein kinases, ataxia-teleangiectasia mutated (ATM) and ATM-Rad3-related (ATR), control not only checkpoint activation but also telomere length. In budding yeast, Mec1 and Tel1 correspond to ATR and ATM, respectively. Here, we show that Cdc13-dependent telomere capping attenuates Mec1 association with DNA ends. The telomeric TG repeat sequence inhibits DNA degradation and decreases Mec1 accumulation at the DNA end. The TG-mediated degradation block requires binding of multiple Cdc13 proteins. The Mre11-Rad50-Xrs2 complex and Exo1 contribute to DNA degradation at DNA ends. Although the TG sequence impedes Exo1 association with DNA ends, it allows Mre11 association. Moreover, the TG sequence does not affect Tel1 association with the DNA end. Our results suggest that the Cdc13 telomere cap coordinates Mec1 and Tel1 accumulation rather than simply covering the DNA ends at telomeres.     

Acquisition of telomere repeat sequences by transfected DNA integrated at the site of a chromosome break.

Previous analysis of plasmid DNA transfected into 108 cell clones demonstrated extensive polymorphism near the integration site in one clone. This polymorphism was apparent by Southern blot analysis as diffuse bands that extended over 30 kb. In the present study, nucleotide sequence analysis of cloned DNA from the integration site revealed telomere repeat sequences at the ends of the integrated plasmid DNA. The telomere repeat sequences at one end were located at the junction between the plasmid and cell DNA. The telomere repeat sequences at the other end were located in the opposite orientation in the polymorphic region and were shown by digestion with BAL 31 to be at the end of the chromosome. Telomere repeat sequences were not found at this location in the plasmid or parent cell DNA. Although the repeat sequences may have been acquired by recombination, a more likely explanation is that they were added to the ends of the plasmid by telomerase before integration. Comparison of the cell DNA before and after integration revealed that a chromosome break had occurred at the integration site, which was shown by fluorescent in situ hybridization to be located near the telomere of chromosome 13. These results demonstrate that chromosome breakage and rearrangement can result in interstitial telomere repeat sequences within the human genome. These sequences could promote genomic instability, because short repeat sequences can be recombinational hotspots. The results also show that DNA rearrangements involving telomere repeat sequences can be associated with chromosome breaks. The introduction of telomere repeat sequences at spontaneous or ionizing radiation-induced DNA strand breaks may therefore also be a mechanism of chromosome fragmentation.     

Characterization of the telomere regions of scleractinian coral, <Emphasis Type="Italic">Acropora surculosa</Emphasis>

Terminal ends of vertebrate chromosomes are protected by tandem repeats of the sequence (TTAGGG). First thought to be vertebrate specific, (TTAGGG) _n has recently been identified in several aquatic invertebrates including sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus), bay scallop (Argopecten irradians), and wedgeshell clam (Donax trunculus). We analyzed genomic DNA from scleractinian corals, Acropora surculosa, Favia pallida, Leptoria phrygia, and Goniastrea retiformis to determine the telomere sequence. Southern blot analysis suggests the presence of the vertebrate telomere repeats in all four species. Treatment of A. surculosa sperm DNA with Bal31 exonuclease revealed progressive shortening of the DNA fragments positive for the (TTAGGG)₂₂ sequence, supporting location of the repeats at the chromosome ends. The presence of the vertebrate telomere repeats in corals is evidence that the (TTAGGG) _n sequence is highly conserved among a divergent group of vertebrate and invertebrate species. Corals are members of the Lower Metazoans, the group of organisms that span the gap between the fungi and higher metazoans. Corals are the most basal organism reported to have the (TTAGGG) _n sequence to date, which suggests that the vertebrate telomere sequence may be much older than previously thought and that corals may share a number of genes with their higher relatives.     

Structure of telomeric chromatin in <Emphasis Type="Italic">Drosophila</Emphasis>

The telomeric nucleoprotein complex protects linear chromosome ends from degradation. In contrast to most eukaryotes in which telomerase is responsible for telomere elongation by adding short DNA repeats synthesized using an RNA template, the telomere elongation in Drosophila involves transposition of specialized telomeric retroelements onto chromosome ends. Proteins that bind telomeric and subtelomeric sequences form specific telomeric chromatin, and its components are highly conserved among organisms employing different mechanisms of telomere elongation. This review is focused on the analysis of components of the Drosophila telomeric complex and its comparison with telomeric proteins in telomerase-encoded organisms. Structural and functional analysis of Drosophila telomeres suggests that there are three distinct chromatin regions: protective structure at the very end of chromosome (cap), subtelomeric region which is characterized by condensed chromatin structure, and the terminal retrotransposon array whose expression is under the control of an RNAi (RNA interference)-based mechanism. The link between RNAi and telomeric chromatin formation in germinal tissues is discussed.     

RTEL1: an essential helicase for telomere maintenance and the regulation of homologous recombination

Telomere maintenance and DNA repair are crucial processes that protect the genome against instability. RTEL1, an essential iron-sulfur cluster-containing helicase, is a dominant factor that controls telomere length in mice and is required for telomere integrity. In addition, RTEL1 promotes synthesis-dependent strand annealing to direct DNA double-strand breaks into non-crossover outcomes during mitotic repair and in meiosis. Here, we review the role of RTEL1 in telomere maintenance and homologous recombination and discuss models linking RTEL1's enzymatic activity to its function in telomere maintenance and DNA repair.     

Telomere maintenance in Drosophila: Rapid transposon evolution at chromosome ends

The maintenance of terminal sequences is an important role of the telomere, since it prevents the loss of internal regions that encode essential genes. In most eukaryotes, this is accomplished by the telomerase. However, telomere length can also be maintained by other mechanisms, such as homologous recombination and transposition of telomeric retrotransposons to the chromosome ends. A remarkable situation is the case of Drosophila, where telomerase was lost, and thus telomeres managed to be maintained by occasional retrotransposition of telomeric elements to the receding ends. In the recent analysis of 12 Drosophila genomes, ¬¬the multiplicity of autonomous and non-autonomous telomere-specific retrotransposons has revealed extensive and rapid evolution of telomeric DNA. The phylogenetic relationship among these telomeric retrotransposons is congruent with the species phylogeny, suggesting that they have been vertically transmitted from a common ancestor. In this review, we also suggest that the formation of a non-canonical DNA structure at Drosophila telomeres could be the way to protect the ends.     

Molecular genetic characterization of Drosophila ATM conserved functional domains

ATM-related kinases promote repair of DNA double-strand breaks and maintenance of chromosome telomeres, functions that are essential for chromosome structural integrity in all eukaryotic organisms. In humans, loss of ATM function is associated with ataxia telangiectasia, a neurodegenerative disease characterized by extreme sensitivity to DNA damage. Drosophila melanogaster has recently emerged as a useful animal model for analyzing the molecular functions of specific domains of this large, multifunctional kinase. The gene encoding Drosophila ATM kinase (dATM) was originally designated tefu because of the telomere fusion defects observed in atm mutants. In this report, molecular characterization of eight atm (tefu) alleles identified nonsense mutations predicted to truncate conserved C-terminal domains of the dATM protein, as well as two interesting missense mutations. One of these missense mutations localized within a putative HEAT repeat in the poorly characterized N-terminal domain of dATM (atm4), whereas another associated with a temperature-sensitive allele (atm8) changed the last amino acid of the conserved FATC domain. Leveraging this molecular information with the powerful genetic tools available in Drosophila should facilitate future analysis of conserved ATM-mediated molecular mechanisms that are important for telomere maintenance, DNA repair, and neurodegeneration.     

An essential role of DmRad51/SpnA in DNA repair and meiotic checkpoint control

Rad51 is a conserved protein essential for recombinational repair of double-stranded DNA breaks (DSBs) in somatic cells and during meiosis in germ cells. Yeast Rad51 mutants are viable but show meiosis defects. In the mouse, RAD51 deletions cause early embryonic death, suggesting that in higher eukaryotes Rad51 is required for viability. Here we report the identification of SpnA as the Drosophila Rad51 gene, whose sequence among the five known Drosophila Rad51-like genes is most closely related to the Rad51 homologs of human and yeast. DmRad51/spnA null mutants are viable but oogenesis is disrupted by the activation of a meiotic recombination checkpoint. We show that the meiotic phenotypes result from an inability to effectively repair DSBs. Our study further demonstrates that in Drosophila the Rad51-dependent homologous recombination pathway is not essential for DNA repair in the soma, unless exposed to DNA damaging agents. We therefore propose that under normal conditions a second, Rad51-independent, repair pathway prevents the lethal effects of DNA damage.