ON THE EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL REPRODUCTION IN HOSTS COEVOLVING WITH MULTIPLE PARASITES

Host–parasite coevolution has been studied extensively in the context of the evolution of sex. Although hosts typically coevolve with several parasites, most studies considered one‐host/one‐parasite interactions. Here, we study population‐genetic models in which hosts interact with two parasites. We find that host/multiple‐parasite models differ nontrivially from host/single‐parasite models. Selection for sex resulting from interactions with a single parasite is often outweighed by detrimental effects due to the interaction between parasites if coinfection affects the host more severely than expected based on single infections, and/or if double infections are more common than expected based on single infections. The resulting selection against sex is caused by strong linkage‐disequilibria of constant sign that arise between host loci interacting with different parasites. In contrast, if coinfection affects hosts less severely than expected and double infections are less common than expected, selection for sex due to interactions with individual parasites can now be reinforced by additional rapid linkage‐disequilibrium oscillations with changing sign. Thus, our findings indicate that the presence of an additional parasite can strongly affect the evolution of sex in ways that cannot be predicted from single‐parasite models, and that thus host/multiparasite models are an important extension of the Red Queen Hypothesis.     

Depression of host population abundance by direct life cycle macroparasites

Simple population models are used to identify the factors which determine the degree to which direct life cycle macroparasites depress their host populations from disease free equilibrium levels. The impact of parasitic infection is shown to be related to a range of biological characteristics of the host and parasite. The most important theoretical predictions are as follows: (1) certain threshold conditions must be satisfied (concerning host density and the rates of host and parasite reproduction) to enable the pathogen to persist with the host population; (2) parasites of low to intermediate pathogenicity are the most effective suppressors of host population growth while highly pathogenic species are likely to cause their own extinction but not that of their host; (3) the statistical distribution of parasite numbers per host has a major influence on the degree of host population depression; (4) host population with high reproductive potential are better able to withstand the impact of pathogens; (5) density dependent constraints on parasite population growth within, or on the host, whether induced by competition for finite resources or immunological attack, restrict the regulatory influence of the parasites; (6) parasites with the ability to multiply directly within the host are the most effective suppressors of host population growth and may cause the extinction of the host and hence themselves.Theoretical predictions are discussed in light of (a) the use of pathogens as biological control agents of pest species and (b) the effects of disease control on host population growth.     

On the stability of polymorphic host-pathogen populations

The stability of populations of hosts and micro-parasites is investigated where each consists of n varieties that are equal in every respect except that each strain of parasites can infect only one specific strain of hosts and none of the others. Collectively the host strains are limited by a carrying capacity and through this limitation the host populations interact with each other. Hosts are assumed to reproduce asexually or such that different strains do not mate or are not fertile if they do. When the excess death rate caused by the pathogenic parasites is sufficiently large, then the host population is regulated to an equilibrium below the carrying capacity of the environment. This polymorphic equilibrium is shown to be locally asymptotically stable. When one of the parasite strains is absent, then all the other strains die out asymptotically. However, if host resistance to all infectious strains of parasites is achieved at the cost of a lower birthrate of the resistant host strain, then, if a certain condition for the various parameters is satisfied, stable coexistence between infected and resistant hosts is possible. There are many examples where susceptibility and resistance of hosts depends upon the conformation of specific proteins that are involved in host-parasite interactions and hence upon alleles at genetic loci that code for these proteins. We propose that polymorphism in wildtype populations which has been the subject of much theorizing in mathematical genetics may be due to host-pathogen interactions. Our model suggests how a polymorphic population, once established, can remain polymorphic indefinitely.     

MAGPIE HOST MANIPULATION BY GREAT SPOTTED CUCKOOS: EVIDENCE FOR AN AVIAN MAFIA?

Why should the hosts of brood parasites accept and raise parasitic offspring that differ dramatically in appearance from their own? There are two solutions to this evolutionary enigma. (1) Hosts may not yet have evolved the capability to discriminate against the parasite, or (2) parasite-host systems have reached an evolutionary equilibrium. Avian brood parasites may either gain renesting opportunities or force their hosts to raise parasitic offspring by destroying or preying upon host eggs or nestlings following host ejection of parasite offspring. These hypotheses may explain why hosts do not remove parasite offspring because only then will hosts avoid clutch destruction by the cuckoo. Here we show experimentally that if the egg of the parasitic great spotted cuckoo Clamator glandarius is removed from nests of its magpie Pica pica host, nests suffer significantly higher predation rates than control nests in which parasite eggs have not been removed. Using plasticine model eggs resembling those of magpies and observations of parasites, we also confirm that great spotted cuckoos that have laid an ejected egg are indeed responsible for destruction of magpie nests with experimentally ejected parasite eggs. Cuckoos benefit from destroying host offspring because they thereby induce some magpies to renest and subsequently accept a cuckoo egg.     

Decisions,decisions, decisions: the host colony choices of a social parasite

Many factors contribute to the success of a socially parasitic strategy, especially the ability of the parasite to invade a host colony. However, little research has focused on the choices that may be made by an invading parasite, specifically whether parasites actively discriminate between different host colonies and if they have a preference for colonies of a particular size. When an allodapine social parasite, Inquilina schwarzi, was presented with colonies of their host species, Exoneura robusta, the parasites were found to invade the larger host colonies. However, it could not be ascertained from this study whether the parasites were making an active decision concerning which colony to invade, or whether they were simply more attracted to the larger colonies due to potentially stronger odour cues. Regardless of the cause, the larger host colonies are more at risk of being invaded by a social parasite, which would give parasites greater resources for exploitation and could also provide selection against the large host colony sizes.     

Immune depression induced by acanthocephalan parasites in their intermediate crustacean host: consequences for the risk of super-infection and links with host behavioural manipulation

Parasite survival in hosts mainly depends on the capacity to circumvent the host immune response. Acanthocephalan infections in gammarids are linked with decreased activity of the prophenoloxidase (ProPO) system, suggesting an active immunosuppression process. Nevertheless, experimental evidence for this hypothesis is lacking: whether these parasites affect several immune pathways is unknown and the consequences of such immune change have not been investigated. In particular, the consequences for other pathogens are not known; neither are the links with other parasite-induced manipulations of the host. Firstly, using experimental infections of Pomphorhynchus laevis we confirmed that the lower immune activity in parasitised Gammarus pulex is induced by the parasite infection. Second, using natural infections of three different parasites, P. laevis, Pomphorhynchus tereticollis and Polymorphus minutus, we showed that acanthocephalan infection was associated with reduction of the activity of the ProPO system and the haemocyte concentration (two major parameters of crustacean immunity) suggesting that immune depression is a phenomenon affecting several immunological activities. This was confirmed by the fact that acanthocephalan infection (whatever the parasite species) was linked to a lower efficiency to eliminate a bacterial infection. The result suggests a cost of parasite immune depression. Finally, acanthocephalans are also known to induce behavioural alterations in the intermediate host which favour their transmission to definitive hosts. We did not find any correlation between behavioural and immunological alterations in both experimentally and naturally-infected gammarids. Overall, this study suggests that whilst immune depression might be beneficial to acanthocephalan survival within the intermediate gammarid host, it might also be costly if it increases host mortality to additional infections before transmission of the parasite.     

When will rejection of parasite nestlings by hosts of nonevicting avian brood parasites be favored? A misimprinting-equilibrium model

It has been suggested that discrimination and rejection of thenestlings of avian brood parasites are most likely to evolvewhen the parasite nestling is raised alongside the host nestlings,for example, many cowbird-host systems. Under these circumstances,the benefits of discrimination are high because the host parentsmay save most of their brood. However, there is a general absenceof nestling rejection behavior among hosts of nonevicting parasites.In a cost-benefit equilibrium model, based on the premise thathost species learn to recognize their offspring through imprintingon first breeding, we show that nestling recognition can beadaptive for hosts of cowbirds, but only under strict conditions.Namely, when host nestling survival alongside the parasite islow, rates of parasitism are high and the average clutch sizeis large. All of these conditions are seldom simultaneouslyachieved in real systems. Most importantly, the parasite nestling,on average, does not sufficiently depress host nestling survivalto outweigh the costs of nestling recognition and rejectionerrors. Thus, we argue that nestling acceptance behaviors byhosts of nonevicting brood parasites may be explained as anevolutionary equilibrium in which recognition costs act as astabilizing selection pressure against rejection when most ofthe host's offspring survive parasitism.     

On the capacity of macroparasites to control insect populations

A graphical model of the population dynamics of macroparasites and their hosts is developed. Three principal means by which the parasites can be regulated are considered: reduction in host density as a result of parasite-induced host mortality, reduction in host density as a result of parasite-induced host sterility, and competition among parasites within multiply-infected hosts. The means by which parasites are regulated has a major effect on the degree to which they can depress host population densities. In particular, a parasite that sterilizes its host is expected to reduce host density more than one that causes an equivalent decline in host fitness through increased mortality. A special case of the model is developed for herbivorous insects that, in the absence of parasites, are limited by larval food resources. Parasites that are regulated via parasite-induced host sterility will control the insect populations below the level set by larval resources if the threshold host density for the parasites (N(T)) is less than the ratio of carrying capacity to net reproductive rate of the insects (K/R). Data are presented showing that all three means of parasite regulation, but especially parasite-induced host sterility, can operate in Howardula aoronymphium, a nematode parasite of mycophagous Drosophila flies. Data from a field cage experiment show that, if these nematodes are regulated primarily via reductions in host density due to this sterility, the parameters N(T), K, and R are such that Howardula is likely to play an important role in controlling Drosophila populations. However, this conclusion must be tempered by the fact that these nematodes also cause increased host mortality and experience within-host competition, making the conditions for parasite control of the flies more stringent.     

Parasites: proxies for host genealogy and ecology?

Genetic information is used extensively to reconstruct the evolutionary and demographic history of organisms. Recently, it has been suggested that genetic information from some parasites can complement genetic data from their hosts. This approach relies upon the hypothesis that such parasites share a common history with their host. In some cases, parasites provide an additional source of information because parasite data can better reconstruct the common history. Here, we discuss which parasite traits are important in determining their usefulness for analysing host history. The key is the matching of the traits of the parasite (e.g. effective population size, generation time, mutation rate and level of host specificity) with the timescales (phylogenetic, phylogeographic and demographic) that are relevant to the issues of concern in host history.     

Complex dynamics of a predator–prey–parasite system: An interplay among infection rate,predator's reproductive gain and preference

Parasites are considered as an important factor in regulating their host populations through trait-mediated effects. On the other hand, predation becomes particularly interesting in host–parasite systems because predation can significantly alter the abundance of parasites and their host population. The combined effects of parasites and predator on host population and community structure therefore may have larger effect. Different field experiments confirm that predators consume disproportionately large number of infected prey in comparison to their susceptible counterpart. There are also substantial evidences that predator has the ability to distinguish prey that have been infected by a parasite and avoid such prey to reduce fitness cost. In this paper we study the predator–prey dynamics, where the prey species is infected by some parasites and predators consume both the susceptible and infected prey with some preference. We demonstrate that complexity in such systems largely depends on the predator's selectivity, force of infection and predator's reproductive gain. If the force of infection and predator's reproductive gain are low, parasites and predators both go to extinction whatever be the predator's preference. The story may be totally different in the opposite case. Survival of species in stable, oscillatory or chaotic states, and their extinction largely depend on the predator's preference. The system may also show two coexistence equilibrium points for some parameter values. The equilibrium with lower susceptible prey density is always stable and the equilibrium with higher susceptible prey density is always unstable. These results suggest that understanding the consequences of predator's selectivity or preference may be crucial for community structure involving parasites.     

Bacteriocins, spite and virulence

There has been much interest in using social evolution theory to predict the damage to a host from parasite infection, termed parasite virulence. Most of this work has focused on how high kinship between the parasites infecting a host can select for more prudent exploitation of the host, leading to a negative relationship between virulence and parasite kinship. However, it has also been shown that if parasites can cooperate to overcome the host, then high parasite kinship within hosts can select for greater cooperation and higher growth rates, hence leading to a positive relationship between virulence and parasite kinship. We examine the impact of a spiteful behaviour, chemical (bacteriocin) warfare between microbes, on the evolution of virulence, and find a new relationship: virulence is maximized when the frequency of kin among parasites' social partners is low or high, and is minimized at intermediate values. This emphasizes how biological details can fundamentally alter the qualitative nature of theoretical predictions made by models of parasite virulence.     

Evolutionary implications for interactions between multiple strains of host and parasite

The interaction between multiple parasite strains within different host types may influence the evolutionary trajectories of parasites. In this article, we formulate a deterministic model with two strains of parasites and two host types in order to investigate how heterogeneities in parasite virulence and host life-history may affect the persistence and spread of diseases in natural systems. We compute the reproductive number of strain i (R(i)) independently, as well as the (conditional) "invasion" reproductive number for strains i (R(i)(j), j not equal i) when strain j is at a positive equilibrium. We show that the disease-free equilibrium is locally asymptotically stable if R(i)<1 for both strains and is unstable if R(i)>1 for one stain. We establish the criterion R(i)(j)>1 for strain i to invade strain j. Subthreshold coexistence driven by coinfection is possible even when R(i) of one strain is below 1. We identify conditions that determine the evolution of parasite specialism or generalism based on the life-history strategies employed by hosts, and investigate how host strains may influence parasite persistence.     

VARIATION BETWEEN POPULATIONS AND LOCAL ADAPTATION IN ACANTHOCEPHALAN‐INDUCED PARASITE MANIPULATION

Many trophically transmitted parasites manipulate their intermediate host phenotype, resulting in higher transmission to the final host. However, it is not known if manipulation is a fixed adaptation of the parasite or a dynamic process upon which selection still acts. In particular, local adaptation has never been tested in manipulating parasites. In this study, using experimental infections between six populations of the acanthocephalan parasite Pomphorhynchus laevis and its amphipod host Gammarus pulex, we investigated whether a manipulative parasite may be locally adapted to its host. We compared adaptation patterns for infectivity and manipulative ability. We first found a negative effect of all parasite infections on host survival. Both parasite and host origins influenced infection success. We found a tendency for higher infectivity in sympatric versus allopatric combinations, but detailed analyses revealed significant differences for two populations only. Conversely, no pattern of local adaptation was found for behavioral manipulation, but manipulation ability varied among parasite origins. This suggests that parasites may adapt their investment in behavioral manipulation according to some of their host's characteristics. In addition, all naturally infected host populations were less sensitive to parasite manipulation compared to a naive host population, suggesting that hosts may evolve a general resistance to manipulation.     

A meta‐analysis of ant social parasitism: host characteristics of different parasitism types and a test of Emery’s rule

Abstract 1. In ant social parasitism, the process by which parasite–host systems evolved and the types of invasion mechanisms parasites use are being debated. Emery’s rule, for example, states that social parasites are the closest relatives to their hosts. The present study uses previously published data to test whether Emery’s rule applies equally to all parasitism types (i.e. xenobiosis, temporary, dulosis, and inquilinism). In addition, this study also investigates other links between parasite–host relatedness and host biology, which has implications for understanding the invasion mechanisms used by certain parasites. 2. We find that xenobiotic parasites typically use distantly‐related host species that are of at least medium colony size. Temporary parasites often have multiple host species that are very closely related to the parasite and hosts with medium‐size colonies. Dulotic parasites frequently have multiple host species that are slightly less related and of any size. Lastly, inquiline parasites tend to have a single, very closely related, host species with medium‐size colonies. 3. Parasites tend to be more closely related to host species if they have a single host species or when the host has a large colony size. In contrast, parasites with multiple host species or hosts of small colony size tend to be less related to their hosts. 4. This study is the first to examine trends in ant social parasitism across all known parasite species. Our meta‐analysis shows that Emery’s rule applies to inquilinism and temporary parasitism, but not to dulosis and xenobiosis. Our results also suggest that both parasitism type and parasite–host relatedness predict the number of hosts and host colony size. It may be that a chemical mimicry mechanism allows invasion of large host colonies, but requires close relatedness of parasite and host, and concentration on a single host species.     

Experimental evolution of resistance in Paramecium caudatum against the bacterial parasite Holospora undulata

Host-parasite coevolution is often described as a process of reciprocal adaptation and counter adaptation, driven by frequency-dependent selection. This requires that different parasite genotypes perform differently on different host genotypes. Such genotype-by-genotype interactions arise if adaptation to one host (or parasite) genotype reduces performance on others. These direct costs of adaptation can maintain genetic polymorphism and generate geographic patterns of local host or parasite adaptation. Fixation of all-resistant (or all-infective) genotypes is further prevented if adaptation trades off with other host (or parasite) life-history traits. For the host, such indirect costs of resistance refer to reduced fitness of resistant genotypes in the absence of parasites. We studied (co)evolution in experimental microcosms of several clones of the freshwater protozoan Paramecium caudatum, infected with the bacterial parasite Holospora undulata. After two and a half years of culture, inoculation of evolved and naive (never exposed to the parasite) hosts with evolved and founder parasites revealed an increase in host resistance, but not in parasite infectivity. A cross-infection experiment showed significant host clone-by-parasite isolate interactions, and evolved hosts tended to be more resistant to their own (local) parasites than to parasites from other hosts. Compared to naive clones, evolved host clones had lower division rates in the absence of the parasite. Thus, our study indicates de novo evolution of host resistance, associated with both direct and indirect costs. This illustrates how interactions with parasites can lead to the genetic divergence of initially identical populations.     

Phylogenetic signals in host–parasite associations for Neotropical bats and Nearctic desert rodents

Hosts and their parasites have strong ecological and evolutionary relationships, with hosts representing habitats and resources for parasites. In the present study, we use approaches developed to evaluate the statistical dependence of species trait values on phylogenetic relationships to determine whether host–parasite relationships (i.e. parasite infections) are contingent on host phylogeny. If host–parasite relationships are contingent on the ability of hosts to provide habitat or resources to parasites, and if host phylogeny is an effective surrogate for among‐host variation in habitat and resource quality, host–parasite relationships should evince phylogenetic signals (i.e. be contingent on host phylogeny). Because the strength of ecological relationships between parasites and their hosts may affect the likelihood of phylogenetic signals occurring in host–parasite relationships, we hypothesized that (1) host specificity would be positively correlated with the strength of phylogenetic signals and (2) the strength of phylogenetic signals will be greater for parasites that rely more on their host throughout their life cycle. Analyses were conducted for ectoparasites from tropical bats and for ectoparasites, helminths, and coccidians from desert rodents. Phylogenetic signals were evaluated for parasite presence and for parasite prevalence. The frequency of phylogenetic signal occurrence was similar for parasite presence and prevalence, with a signal detected in 24–27% of cases at the species level and in 67% and 15% of cases at the genus level for parasites of bats and rodents, respectively. No differences in signal strength or the likelihood of detecting a signal existed between groups of parasites. Phylogenetic signal strength was correlated with host specificity, suggesting that mechanisms increasing host specificity also increase the likelihood of a phylogenetic signal in host use by parasites. Differences in the transmission mode did not affect signal strength or the likelihood of detecting a signal, indicating that variation in host switching opportunities associated with the transmission mode does not affect signal strength.     

Random parasite encounters coupled with condition-linked immunity of hosts generate parasite aggregation

Parasite aggregation is viewed as a natural law in parasite-host ecology but is a paradox insofar as parasites should follow the Poisson distribution if hosts are encountered randomly. Much research has focused on whether parasite aggregation in or on hosts is explained by aggregation of infective parasite stages in the environment, or by heterogeneity within host samples in terms of host responses to infection (e.g., through representation of different age classes of hosts). In this paper, we argue that the typically aggregated distributions of parasites may be explained simply. We propose that aggregated distributions can be derived from parasites encountering hosts randomly, but subsequently by parasites being 'lost' from hosts based on condition-linked escape or immunity of hosts. Host condition should be a normally distributed trait even among otherwise homogeneous sets of hosts. Our model shows that mean host condition and variation in host condition have different effects on the different metrics of parasite aggregation. Our model further predicts that as host condition increases, parasites become more aggregated but numbers of attending parasites are reduced overall and this is important for parasite population dynamics. The effects of deviation from random encounter are discussed with respect to the relationship between host condition and final parasite numbers.     

Interactions between monogenean parasites and their fish hosts

Parasite factors associated with recognition and selection of the host and the mechanisms in the host responsible for acceptance or rejection of the invading organism were evaluated. Sensory structures in parasites are able to detect differences between different fish species and this ability to discern between fishes may be based on both chemical and mechanical stimuli on the host surface. Complex glycoproteins, proteins, carbohydrates and simple molecules attract parasites or modify their behaviour. Furthermore, attachment of the monogenean parasite to a host is dependent on both mechanical structures and chemical factors in the parasite. These systems comprise anterior pads, posterior haptors, gland secretions, and muscular elements. The parasite needs access to appropriate nutrients which can be absorbed and used for reproduction and in this context signals from the host are needed for an optimal physiological response of the parasite. The innate and adaptive immune systems of the host are important elements in this question. Investigations have indicated that innate host factors (complement, lectins, acute phase reactants, macrophages) can bind to monogeneans and elicit severe damage to the parasites. The targets for these hostile products are not only the monogenean tegument, but may involve the gastrodermis and glands. However, the parasite's ability to avoid and even exploit the wide array of immunological elements of the host may be an important player in the dynamic interactions between host and monogenean determining host specificity. Even fish hosts susceptible to a certain parasite show an ability to mount a protective response at post-infection periods. Elevation of the host's production of adaptive and non-adaptive factors following monogenean infections of a certain duration may explain the acquired response.     

The ecology and phylogeny of oomycete infections in Asplanchna rotifers

1. Recently, the potential for parasites to influence the ecology and evolution of their zooplankton hosts has been the subject of increasing study. However, most research to date has focussed on Daphnia hosts, and the potential for parasites to influence other zooplankton taxa remains largely unstudied. 2. During routine sampling of zooplankton in a eutrophic lake, we observed that the rotifer Asplanchna girodi was often infected with a parasitic oomycete. Epidemics of this parasite occurred frequently, with three separate events in a single year. Prevalence at peak infection ranged from 29 to 41% and epidemics lasted from 17 to 56 days. Our data indicate that high densities of the host population are required for epidemics to occur. 3. Our morphological and molecular analyses suggest that this parasite is in the genus Pythium. Most Pythium spp. are plant pathogens, but our study supports recent work on Daphnia, suggesting that Pythium spp. are also important parasites of zooplankton. 4. As the parasite in this study was recalcitrant to cultivation, we developed an alternative method to verify its identity. Our approach used quantitative PCR to show that the ribosomal sequences identified increased with increasing density of infected hosts and, thus, were associated with the parasite. This approach should be generally applicable to other plankton parasites that are difficult to cultivate outside their hosts. 5. Infections significantly reduced host fecundity, lifespan and population growth rate. As a result of the virulence of this parasite, it is likely to influence the population ecology and evolution of its Asplanchna host, and may be a useful model system for studies on host–parasite coevolutionary dynamics.