Typical versions of learned swamp sparrow song types are more effective signals than are less typical versions

The learned songs of songbirds often cluster into population-wide types. Here, we test the hypothesis that male and female receivers respond differently to songs depending on how typical of those types they are. We used computational methods to cluster a large sample of swamp sparrow (Melospiza georgiana) songs into types and to estimate the degree to which individual song exemplars are typical of these types. We then played exemplars to male and female receivers. Territorial males responded more aggressively and captive females performed more sexual displays in response to songs that are highly typical than to songs that are less typical. Previous studies have demonstrated that songbirds distinguish song types that are typical for their species, or for their population, from those that are not. Our results show that swamp sparrows also discriminate typical from less typical exemplars within learned song-type categories. In addition, our results suggest that more typical versions of song types function better, at least in male–female communication. This finding is consistent with the hypothesis that syllable type typicality serves as a proxy for the assessment of song learning accuracy.     

Saisonaler Verlauf der Gesangsaktivit?t der Singdrossel(Turdus philomelos), mit Anmerkungen zum nachbrutzeitlichen Gesangsschub

Zusammenfassung Der Zürichbergwald ist eine 350 ha große, bewaldete Kuppe auf 480–680 m ü.M. am Rande der Stadt Zürich. Hier untersuchten wir von 1989 bis 1995 die jahreszeitliche Gesangsaktivität der Singdrossel mit zwei verschiedenen Ansätzen. 1989 und 1991–1995 zählte JH an 123 Tagen auf zwei festgelegten Strecken von 6,1 und 7,1 km die Sänger jeweils in der Stunde der abendlichen Dämmerung. Im gleichen Gebiet zählte RS 1990 an 46 Tagen auf einer 6,7 km langen Strecke am Morgen in der Stunde nach Sonnenaufgang. Ebenfalls 1990 sammelte RS Daten zur Brutbiologie.Die Gesangsaktivität definierten wir mit der Anzahl singender Männchen pro km. Im Jahresverlauf zeigen die Kurven der Morgen- und der Abendaktivität keinen Unterschied. Die Kurve ist deutlich dreiphasig: Ein erster Gesangsschub vom Eintreffen der Vögel bis zum 5. April, danach eine gesangsarme Zwischenzeit bis zum 15. Mai, gefolgt von einem zweiten Gesangsschub, welcher bis zum 5. Juli dauern kann. Allenfalls ist der erste Gesangsschub (stark zeitverschoben) mit dem Beginn der Erstbruten korreliert; die von vielen Singvögel bekannte, markante Gesangsaktivität unmittelbar vor der Eiablage gibt es nicht. Der zweite Gesangsschub ist in der Stärke mit dem ersten vergleichbar. Allerdings liegt er eindeutig am Ende der Brutzeit und kann nicht mit einem Brutparameter (Partnerfindung, Paarbindung, Balz, Brut-Stimulation) in Zusammenhang stehen. Die Funktion dieser nachbrutzeitlichen Gesangsaktivität scheint zukunftsbezogen zu sein. In Frage kommt gehäuftes Singen der Väter vor den Jungen zum Erlernen des Gesangs und des Dialekts, oder/und eine Revier-Voranzeige für die nänchste Brutsaison durch die als philopatrisch bekannten Männchen.

---

Annual variation in singing activity of the Song Thrush(Turdus philomelos), with comments on high postbreeding song output

Summary This study was carried out at the Zürichbergwald, a forest east of Zurich (47°20N/08°30E). The study site is a wooded hill of 350 ha between 480 to 680 m asl, characterised by a BeechFagus silvatica forest with patches of SprucePicea abies on 25 % of its surface. The Zürichbergwald is a popular recreational area with moderate forestry exploitation. We did not differentiate acoustic registration from singing activity, and we considered the number of singing males per km to be a measure for singing activity. Two different approaches were applied: in 6 breeding seasons (1989 and 1991 to 1995) JH counted birds at sunset on a 6.1 or 7.1 km circuit (n=123). In 1990, the same was done by RS at dawn each morning on a zigzag track of 6.7 km (n=46). Also in 1990, RS sampled data on the breeding biology of the species.The annual cycle of morning and evening song activity was significantly correlated (Spearman's rank-test; p<0.001 comparing pentads, p=0.025 comparing half of months). Morning and evening revealed the same pattern: there was a first large peak of singing activity early in the year (earliest onset of singing 19 February 1989; latest 8 March 1993) until 5 April (phase I). A period of low song activity followed from 6 April to 15 May (phase II). The period from 16 May to (circa) 5 July was characterized by a second large peak (phase III). Each of the corresponding phases was comparable between morning and evening (Wilcoxon matching pairs; p>0.05). The analysis of evening data reveals that phase II differed from I and from III (p=0.05), but the last two did not differ significantly (Wilcoxon matching pairs; p>0.05).The day with the highest song activity fell in phase I twice (maximum 6.1 singing males/km, 2 April 1995) and 5 times in phase III (maximum 6.9 singing males/km, 23 May 1994).The date females first laid was determined for 53 out of 68 nests. The first brood started 25 March, the last 25 June 1990. Only 3 broods were initiated later than 5 June.The first peak of singing activity could be correlated with the (delayed) onset of breeding, but the second started at the end of the breeding season and persisted too long to be correlated with any breeding activity such as female attraction or stimulation, mate-guarding, etc. We postulate the high post-breeding song output to have several possible functions: Song instruction by father to offspring, or territory announcement for the next season.

     

Individual differences affect honest signalling in a songbird

Research in the past decade has established the existence of consistent individual differences or ‘personality’ in animals and their important role in many aspects of animal behaviour. At the same time, research on honest signalling of aggression has revealed that while some of the putative aggression signals are reliable, they are only imperfectly so. This study asks whether a significant portion of the variance in the aggression-signal regression may be explained by individual differences in signalling strategies. Using the well-studied aggressive signalling system of song sparrows (Melospiza melodia), we carried out repeated assays to measure both aggressive behaviours and aggressive signalling of territorial males. Through these assays, we found that aggressive behaviours and aggressive signalling were both highly repeatable, and moreover that aggressive behaviours in 2009–2010 predicted whether the birds would attack a taxidermic mount over a year later. Most significantly, we found that residual variation in signalling behaviours, after controlling for aggressive behaviour, was individually consistent, suggesting there may be a second personality trait determining the level of aggressive signalling. We term this potential personality trait ‘communicativeness’ and discuss these results in the context of honest signalling theories and recent findings reporting prevalence of ‘under-signalling’.     

鸟类鸣声地理变异的形成机制

鸣声在鸟类的通讯和性选择中具有重要的意义.鸣声地理变异广泛存在于鸟类中,对其研究有助于了解近缘种的分类和演化历史.鸣声地理变异格局的形成是一个复杂的过程,可能是某一因素起主导、多因素协同作用的结果.主要影响因素有奠基者效应、鸣声漂变、遗传差异、性选择、生境等.年际间鸣声的稳定性和种群内鸣声的变异性,是鸣声地理变异研究中应该重视的问题,通过鸣声学习和扩散机制来研究鸣声地理变异,可能是将来本领域的研究热点.     

The day after: effects of vocal interactions on territory defence in nightingales

1. Models on territory acquisition and tenure predict that territorial animals benefit by adjusting territorial defence behaviour to previous challenges they had experienced within the socially complex environment of communication networks. 2. Here, we addressed such issues of social cognition by investigating persisting effects of vocal contests on territory defence behaviour in nightingales Luscinia megarhynchos (Brehm). 3. Using interactive playback during nocturnal song of subjects, a rival was simulated to countersing either aggressively (by song overlapping) or moderately (by song alternating) from outside the subjects' territory. Thereby, the time-specific singing strategy provided an experimentally controlled source of information on the motivation of an unfamiliar rival. 4. Expecting that nightingales integrate information with time, the same rival was simulated to return as a moderately singing intruder on the following morning. 5. The results show that the vigour with which male nightingales responded to the simulated intrusion of an opponent during the day depended on the nature of the nocturnal vocal interaction experienced several hours before. 6. Males that had received the song overlapping playback the preceding night approached the simulated intruder more quickly and closer and sang more songs near the loudspeaker than did males that had received a song alternating playback. 7. This adjustment of territory defence strategies depending on information from prior signalling experience suggests that integrating information with time plays an important part in territory defence by affecting a male's decision making in a communication network.     

Lateralization and motor stereotype of song production in the brown-headed cowbird

Song production in adult brown-headed cowbirds(Molothrus ater ater) is lateralized, with a slight right syringeal dominance. The left size of the syrinx produces low-frequency (200–2000 Hz) notes within the introductory note clusters, while the right side produces the higher-frequency (1500–6000 Hz) introductory notes, the interphrase unit (10–12 kHz), and the final high-frequency whistle (5–13 kHz). Cross-correlation analyses reveal that individual cowbirds produce each of their four to seven song types with a distinct stereotyped motor pattern–as judged by the patterns of syringeal airflow and subsyringeal pressure. The acoustic differences across song types are reflected in the differences in the bronchial airflow and air sac pressure patterns associated with song production. These motor differences are particularly striking within the second and third introductory note clusters where there is a rapid switching back and forth between the two sides of the syrinx in the production of notes. These motor skills may be especially important in producing behaviorally effective song. 1994 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.     

Why do songbirds sing intensively at dawn?

Among the ideas proposed to explain the existence of the dawn chorus in songbirds, the acoustic transmission hypothesis claims that birds sing most intensively at dawn because this is the time of the day when songs suffer least from environmentally induced degradation and hence propagate over the longest distances. In this article, we report on the first sound transmission experiment that directly tests this assumption using natural song from a typically forest-living dawn chorusing bird, the blackcap Sylvia atricapilla. Representative sound elements from the introductory twitter part and from the terminating motif part of the blackcap song were transmitted and re-recorded at three different times of the day: dawn, midmorning, and early afternoon. These recordings were then compared with respect to the following measures of sound degradation: signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), excess attenuation, blurring over song elements, and elongation of song elements by tails of echoes. As could be expected, both the background noise and the SNR varied considerably over the day. More surprisingly the excess attenuation decreased during the day, being lowest in the afternoon. There was no diurnal variation in blurring and elongation by echoes. The results may be explained by the diurnal variation in physical parameters such as temperature, relative humidity, and wind speed. The implications of this for different communication activities are discussed. Overall, the results show that dawn conditions in a temperate deciduous forest do not always constitute the best circumstances for long-range communication and therefore that the dawn chorus cannot be explained by the sound transmission hypothesis. Received in revised form: 24 September 2001 Electronic Publication     

Bird song and anthropogenic noise: vocal constraints may explain why birds sing higher-frequency songs in cities

When animals live in cities, they have to adjust their behaviour and life histories to novel environments. Noise pollution puts a severe constraint on vocal communication by interfering with the detection of acoustic signals. Recent studies show that city birds sing higher-frequency songs than their conspecifics in non-urban habitats. This has been interpreted as an adaptation to counteract masking by traffic noise. However, this notion is debated, for the observed frequency shifts seem to be less efficient at mitigating noise than singing louder, and it has been suggested that city birds might use particularly high-frequency song elements because they can be produced at higher amplitudes. Here, we present the first phonetogram for a songbird, which shows that frequency and amplitude are strongly positively correlated in the common blackbird (Turdus merula), a successful urban colonizer. Moreover, city blackbirds preferentially sang higher-frequency elements that can be produced at higher intensities and, at the same time, happen to be less masked in low-frequency traffic noise.     

Wild Birds Learn Songs from Experimental Vocal Tutors

Download video (45MB)Help with mp4 files     

The learning advantage: bird species that learn their song show a tighter adjustment of song to noisy environments than those that do not learn

Song learning has evolved within several avian groups. Although its evolutionary advantage is not clear, it has been proposed that song learning may be advantageous in allowing birds to adapt their songs to the local acoustic environment. To test this hypothesis, we analysed patterns of song adjustment to noisy environments and explored their possible link to song learning. Bird vocalizations can be masked by low‐frequency noise, and birds respond to this by singing higher‐pitched songs. Most reports of this strategy involve oscines, a group of birds with learning‐based song variability, and it is doubtful whether species that lack song learning (e.g. suboscines) can adjust their songs to noisy environments. We address this question by comparing the degree of song adjustment to noise in a large sample of oscines (17 populations, 14 species) and suboscines (11 populations, 7 species), recorded in Brazil (Manaus, Brasilia and Curitiba) and Mexico City. We found a significantly stronger association between minimum song frequency and noise levels (effect size) in oscines than in suboscines, suggesting a tighter match in oscines between song transmission capacity and ambient acoustics. Suboscines may be more vulnerable to acoustic pollution than oscines and thus less capable of colonizing cities or acoustically novel habitats. Additionally, we found that species whose song frequency was more divergent between populations showed tighter noise–song frequency associations. Our results suggest that song learning and/or song plasticity allows adaptation to new habitats and that this selective advantage may be linked to the evolution of song learning and plasticity.