Antagonism between estrogens and androgens on GCDFP-15 gene expression in ZR-75-1 cells and correlation between GCDFP-15 and estrogen as well as progesterone receptor expression in human breast cancer

The androgen dihydrotestosterone (DHT) caused a maximal 65% inhibition of proliferation of the human breast cancer cells ZR-75-1 after a 10-day incubation period. The same treatment, on the other hand, stimulated by 25-fold the secretion of the breast marker protein GCDFP-15 (gross cystic disease fluid protein-15). The stimulatory effect of DHT on GCDFP-15 mRNA accumulation was already significant (1.6-fold, P less than 0.01) after a 12 h exposure and reached a maximal 25-fold increase after a 12-day incubation period. On the other hand, a 2-day exposure to 1 nM 17 beta-estradiol (E2) alone decreased by 60% GCDFP-15 mRNA levels while it completely blocked the 2.5-fold stimulation of GCDFP-15 secretion induced by concomitant incubation with DHT. Furthermore, a 10-day incubation with E2 increased by 4-fold the proliferation of ZR-75-1 cells whereas such treatment decreased by about 85% both GCDFP-15 mRNA accumulation and the secretion of the glycoprotein. The presence of GCDFP-15 mRNA in human breast cancer samples was restricted to estrogen receptor positive tumors and was significantly correlated with progesterone receptor expression.     

Immunohistochemical characterization of neoplastic cells of breast origin

ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: After skin cancer, breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women. Tumors of unknown origin account for 5-15% of malignant neoplasms, with 1.5% corresponding to breast cancer. We selected an immunohistochemical panel with conventional and newer markers, such as mammaglobin, for the detection of neoplastic cells of breast origin. The specific objectives are: 1) to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the panel, with an especial emphasis on the inclusion of the mammaglobin marker, and 2) to compare immunohistochemistry performed on whole tissue sections and on Tissue Micro-Array. Methods. Twenty-nine metastatic breast tumors were included and assumed as tumors of unknown origin. Other 48 biopsies of other tissues were selected and assumed as negative controls. Tissue Micro-Array was performed. Immunohistochemistry for mammaglobin, gross cystic disease fluid protein-15, estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and cytokeratin 7 was done. Results. Mammaglobin positive staining was observed in 10/29 cases, in 13/29 cases for gross cystic disease fluid protein-15, in 20/29 cases for estrogen receptor, 9/29 cases for progesterone receptor, and in 25/29 cases for cytokeratin 7. Among the negative controls, mammaglobin was positive in 2/48, and gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 in 4/48. Conclusions. The inclusion of MAG antibody in the immunohistochemical panel for the detection of tumors of unknown origin increased the probability of detecting metastasis of breast cancer. For the diagnostic strategy with the highest positive predictive value (87.5%), hormone receptors and mammaglobin were considered in serial, non-parallel manner.     

Inhibitory effect of estrogens on GCDFP-15 mRNA levels and secretion in ZR-75-1 human breast cancer cells

In order to better understand the mechanisms responsible for the antagonism between steroids in human breast cancer cells, we have studied the effect of 17 beta-estradiol (E2), dihydrotestosterone (DHT), and dexamethasone (DEX) alone or in combination on the expression of the breast gross cystic disease fluid protein-15 (GCDFP-15) in ZR-75-1 cells. Incubation with E2 markedly decreased basal GCDFP-15 mRNA levels accompanied by a parallel inhibition of the secretion of this tumor marker, the estrogenic effect being exerted at a half-maximal concentration of about 44 pM E2. The inhibitory effect of E2 on GCDFP-15 expression was competitively reversed by the antiestrogen LY156758. In addition, 1 nM E2 inhibited the marked stimulation induced by 1 nM DHT or 300 nM DEX on GCDFP-15 mRNA accumulation and on the secretion of the glycoprotein. However, at the concentration used, E2 reversed by only 65% the stimulation achieved by the combination of DHT and DEX on GCDFP-15 mRNA levels. It is of interest to mention that the effect of DHT, DEX, and E2 on GCDFP-15 expression is opposite to the respective effect of each steroid on ZR-75-1 cell proliferation. The present data on the regulation of GCDFP-15 mRNA demonstrate an estrogen-induced inhibition of mRNA levels under physiological conditions, thus offering a unique opportunity to study the mechanisms involved in the down-regulation of gene expression by estrogens and to achieve a better understanding of the antagonism between estrogens, androgens, glucocorticoids, and progestins in breast cancer cells. Furthermore, GCDFP-15 could well be a good marker for monitoring the response to androgens and antiestrogens during the course of breast cancer therapy.     

Mammaglobin,GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3), and epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression in different breast cancer subtypes and their clinical significance

Increasing evidence has shown that mammaglobin, GATA-binding protein 3 (GATA3), and epithelial growth factor receptor (EGFR) have unique clinical implications for breast cancer subtyping and classification, as well as for breast cancer targeted therapy. It is particularly important to clarify the correlation between their expression and different molecular breast carcinoma subtypes to better understand the molecular basis of the subtypes and to identify effective therapeutic targets for the disease. This study aimed to evaluate mammaglobin, GATA3, and EGFR expression in different breast cancer subtypes, as well as their clinical significance. Subjects of the study included 228 patients with breast cancer at The First Affiliated Hospital of University of Science and Technology of China. They were divided into triple negative (TN), Luminal A, Luminal B, and HER-2 positive (HER-2.P) breast cancer groups based on molecular classification. Immunohistochemical methods were used to detect mammaglobin, GATA3, and EGFR expression in cases of different molecular subtypes before determining the correlation between protein expression and subtype. Mammaglobin and GATA3 expression levels were found to significantly vary with respect to histopathological grade, lymph node status, and molecular subtype; EGFR expression was significantly correlated with breast cancer histopathological grade and molecular subtype. For breast cancer, the expression levels of mammaglobin and GATA3, as well as mammaglobin and EGFR, were significantly correlated. In addition, there was a significantly negative correlation between the expression levels of GATA3 and EGFR in breast cancer tissue samples, especially in HER-2.P samples. These findings provide a theoretical basis for assessing breast cancer clinical prognosis based on the cancer subtype, and hence, have significant practical value.Key words: breast cancer, mammaglobin, GATA-binding protein 3, epithelial growth factor receptor, molecular subtype     

Clinical significance of blood-based miRNAs as diagnostic and prognostic nucleic acid markers in breast cancer: Comparative to conventional tumor markers

microRNAs (miRNAs) are implicated in carcinogenesis and their expression in biological fluids offer great potential as nucleic acid markers for cancer detection and progression. Authors investigated the expression level of miRNAs (miRNA-21, miRNA-126, and miRNA-155) to evaluate their role as diagnostic and prognostic markers for breast cancer compared with other commonly used protein-based markers (CEA and CA15-3). Serum samples from patients with breast cancer (n = 96), patients with benign breast lesion (n = 47), and healthy individuals (n = 39) were enrolled for detection of miRNA expression levels and protein-based tumor markers using fluorescent real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, respectively. Correlation among investigated markers with clinicopathological factors and clinical outcomes were determined. Expression of miRNA-21 and miRNA-155 revealed significant increases in patients with breast cancer compared with both benign and control groups, the same result was reported for tumor markers; on the other hand, miRNA-126 was significantly decreased in breast cancer group as compared with the other two groups. miRNA frequencies were significantly related to clinical staging and histological grading as compared with tumor markers. Patients with breast cancer with increased miRNA-21 and miRNA-155 and decreased miRNA-126 expressions had significantly worse disease-free survival, while only miRNA-21 and miRNA-126 showed poor OS (P< 0.005). In conclusion, investigated miRNAs were superior over tumor markers for the early stage of breast cancer especially those with high-risk factor and their assessment in blood facilitates their role as a potential prognostic molecular marker.     

Antigen levels of urokinase type plasminogen activator and its inhibitors in primary breast cancer

Primary Breast Cancer, Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator, Inhibitors The aim of the study was to monitor urokinase plasminogen activator antigen concentrations and its type 1 (PAI-1) and type 2 (PAI-2) inhibitors in histologically defined forms of primary breast cancer and a comparison with these antigens levels in normal tissue. Another goal was a search for a relationship/or its lack/between the occurrence of the new generation markers of neoplastic disease and a presence/or absence/of lymph node metastases. U-PA, PAI-1 and PAI-2 antigen levels were determined by ELISA tests in protein extracts of breast cancer tissues. Among the studied breast tumors 32 specimens were ductal carcinomas, 15 specimens were lobular carcinomas and the remaining 13 were other rare histological forms. In comparison to the obtained values of u-PA antigen levels in normal tissue, the values in neoplastic tissues were elevated several times: 11-fold, 6-fold and 15-fold in ductal c., lobular c. and other rare neoplasms. The values of PAI-1 antigen levels were about 20-fold higher for all studied, histologically defined primary breast cancers. The greatest differences of PAI-2 antigen levels growth was observed in histologically defined primary breast cancer forms. It was augmented 10-fold, 40-fold and 20-fold, respectively, for ductal carcinoma, lobular carcinoma and rare forms of neoplasms. In various forms of invasive breast cancer and those without lymph node metastases the content of u-PA, PAI-1 and PAI-2 were also significantly elevated. Among the new generation of independent markers of the neoplastic process, PAI-2 seems to be the most reliable marker for the identification of primary breast cancer. The goal of the present study was to evaluate a possible combined prognostic value of the three major components of the u-PA system (u-PA, PAI-1 and PAI-2) in patients with defined histopathological forms of primary breast cancer.     

High levels of cathepsin B predict poor outcome in patients with breast cancer

Cathepsin B (CB) is a thiol-stimulated protease implicated in cancer invasion and metastasis. Other proteases involved in cancer spread such as urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and cathepsin D have previously been shown to be prognostic markers in breast cancer. CB was assayed by ELISA in 193 patients with primary breast cancer. CB levels were significantly higher in both primary and metastatic breast tumors than in fibroadenomas (p = 0.0001). In the primary carcinomas, CB levels showed no significant correlation with either nodal status, tumor size or estrogen receptor (ER) status. Patients with primary breast cancers containing high levels of CB had a significantly shorter disease-free interval (p = 0.01, chi-square = 6.61) and overall survival (p = 0.014, chi-square = 6.08) than patients with low levels of the protease. However, in multivariate analysis, using nodal status, tumor size, ER status and urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA), CB was not an independent prognostic marker. In contrast, nodal status, ER status and uPA were prognostic in multivariate analysis. In conclusion, CB, like certain other proteases implicated in cancer metastasis, correlates with poor outcome in patients with breast cancer. These results thus support the evidence from model systems linking CB to cancer spread. Inhibition of CB expression or activity might therefore be exploited for anti-metastatic therapies.     

乳腺、甲状腺多原发癌患者乳腺癌组织中RETmRNA的表达及意义

目的：研究乳腺癌术后发生甲状腺癌患者乳腺癌组织中RET（rearranged during transfection）基因的表达及临床意义。方法：用逆转录-聚合酶链反应（RT-PCR）检测33例乳腺、甲状腺多原发癌患者乳腺癌组织中RET基因的酪氨酸激酶区（TK）的表达进行分析,并设30例单纯乳腺癌和20例乳腺良性病变做对照组。结果：（1）乳腺、甲状腺多原发癌患者乳腺癌组织中RET-TK阳性检测率达57.6%（19/33）,单纯乳腺癌患者癌组织中RET-TK阳性检出率30%（9/30）,乳腺良性病变患者病变乳腺组织中RET-TK阳性检出率为10%（2/20）。三组的阳性率差别分别都有统计学意义（P＆lt;0.05）。（2）RET-TK的阳性表达与患者的ER情况相关（P＆lt;0.05）,而与患者年龄、肿瘤直径、同侧腋窝淋巴结转移、Her-2表达等病理学特征无关（P＆gt;0.05）。结论：RET基因的过量表达可能与乳腺、甲状腺多原发癌的发生有关。     

A novel aspartyl proteinase from apocrine epithelia and breast tumors

GCDFP-15 (gross cystic disease fluid protein, 15 kDa) is a secretory marker of apocrine differentiation in breast carcinoma. In human breast cancer cell lines, gene expression is regulated by hormones, including androgens and prolactin. The protein is also known under different names in different body fluids such as gp17 in seminal plasma. GCDFP-15/gp17 is a ligand of CD4 and is a potent inhibitor of T-cell apoptosis induced by sequential CD4/T-cell receptor triggering. We now report that GCDFP-15/gp17 is a protease exhibiting structural properties relating it to the aspartyl proteinase superfamily. Unexpectedly, GCDFP-15/gp17 appears to be related to the retroviral members rather than to the known cellular members of this class. Site-specific mutagenesis of Asp(22) (predicted to be catalytically important for the active site) and pepstatin A inhibition confirmed that the protein is an aspartic-type protease. We also show that, among the substrates tested, GCDFP-15/gp17 is specific for fibronectin. The study of GCDFP-15/gp17-mediated proteolysis may provide a handle to understand phenomena as diverse as mammary tumor progression and fertilization.     

Purification and characterization of the mammaglobin/lipophilin B complex,a promising diagnostic marker for breast cancer

Mammaglobin, a promising diagnostic marker for breast cancer, forms a covalent complex with lipophilin B. mRNA levels for each component of the complex were determined for a number of breast tumors and normal tissues, and correlation of message expression was highly significant between mammaglobin and lipophilin B (p < 0.0001). The complex was purified by both standard biochemical techniques and immunoaffinity chromatography. N-Terminal sequencing revealed that mammaglobin and lipophilin B are processed as predicted by cleavage of their signal sequence after amino acids 19 and 21, respectively. Three molecular masses-representing the fully glycosylated form, the complex without one of the carbohydrate chains, and the deglycosylated proteins-are detected by ProteinChip array SELDI-TOF mass spectrometry after partial enzymatic deglycosylation. This is consistent with the two predicted N-linked glycosylation sites in the primary sequence of mammaglobin and each site having an attached sugar of approximately 3500 Da. Reducing agents release lipophilin B from mammaglobin, and the free peptides are seen at their predicted molecular masses in the deglycosylated complex. Molecular modeling, secondary structure prediction, and circular dichroism indicate that the complex is a small alpha-helical globule that has three disulfide bridges and a carbohydrate chain at each pole. LC-ESI-MS shows that mammaglobin and lipophilin B are bonded in a head to tail orientation. This work describes the biochemistry of the mammaglobin/lipophilin B complex and lays the framework for use of this complex as a novel protein-based serological marker for breast cancer.     

Immunoperoxidase localization of GCDFP-15 with mouse monoclonal antibodies versus rabbit antiserum

Five monoclonal antibodies (Mabs) raised against separate determinants on a breast gross cystic disease fluid protein of 15 KD (GCDFP-15) were compared to one another and to a rabbit antiserum (Rb) against GCDFP-15 by radioimmunoassay (RIA) and by immunoperoxidase localization in paraffin-embedded tissues. All five Mabs and the Rb were equivalent in recognition of GCDFP-15 in solution, as determined by RIA. However, two of the Mabs (A5, B15) showed only minimal binding to GCDFP-15 in paraffin-embedded tissues, whereas the other three Mabs (B1, B4, D6) were equivalent to the Rb in staining intensity. These latter three Mabs and the Rb were evaluated by the immunoperoxidase technique on a variety of benign and malignant neoplasms as well as normal tissues (150 specimens) for staining specificity. Immunoperoxidase staining by the three Mabs vs the Rb was equivalent in apocrine glands, metaplastic apocrine epithelium of breast, and breast carcinomas with apocrine features. No staining of the Mabs or Rb was seen in the other tissue specimens.     

Novel immunohistochemical markers for the differentiation of lobular and ductal invasive breast carcinomas

AIMS. Invasive ductal and lobular carcinomas are the most common histological types of breast cancer. The loss of E-cadherin expression has been suggested to be the most reliable marker for invasive lobular carcinoma. The aim of our study was to identify the diagnostic usefulness of novel markers in the differentiation of these tumor types. METHODS. We examined tissue microarrays (TMA) which were constructed from surgical specimens of 119 breast cancer patients. TMA consisted of 80 ductal carcinomas, 29 lobular carcinomas and special type cancers. TMA sections were stained using standard immunohistochemical methods. Monoclonal mouse antibodies against E-cadherin, cytokeratin 5/6 and 17, and polyclonal mouse antibodies against EMP1, DDR1, PRKCI and DVL1 were used. RESULTS. E-cadherin was absent in 93.3% of lobular tumors compared with only 15 % of ductal tumors (p<0.0001). EMP1 and DVL1 were overexpressed in lobular tumors (93.1% and 96.5%, respectively), whereas PRKCI and DDR1 were positive in ductal cancers (90% and 96.2%, respectively). Reduced expression or absence of both cytokeratins 5/6 and 17 was found in both tumor tissues in comparison to normal terminal duct lobular units (p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS. Apart from the well-established marker, E-cadherin, proteins examined on TMA slides by immunohistochemistry (EMP1, DVL1, DDR1, PRKCI) may represent novel tissue markers helpful in the differentiation of ductal and lobular breast cancers. Further studies with larger sets of patients are desirable, to verify the complete immunohistochemical profiles of various histological types of breast cancer and determine the prognostic and predictive significance of novel markers.     

Mammaglobin is found in breast tissue as a complex with BU101

The mammaglobin gene has been shown to be preferentially expressed in breast tissue. Few genes match its specificity. Mammaglobin has generated much interest, and studies are ongoing to develop diagnostic tests for breast cancer based on the detection of mammaglobin. While searching the Incyte Genomics Lifeseq database for tissue-specific markers, we observed a second secretoglobin, BU101, also known as lipophilin B. We report here that mammaglobin, in breast tissue, is found as a complex with BU101. The complex was isolated from breast cancer tissue and was characterized as the biologically relevant form of mammaglobin.     

Clinical Relevance of Loss of 11p15 in Primary and Metastatic Breast Cancer: Association with Loss of PRKCDBP Expression in Brain Metastases

The occurrence of brain metastases among breast cancer patients is currently rising with approximately 20–25% incidence rates, underlining the importance of the identification of new therapeutic and prognostic markers. We have previously screened for new markers for brain metastasis by array CGH. We found that loss of 11p15 is common among these patients. In this study, we investigated the clinical significance of loss of 11p15 in primary breast cancer (BC) and breast cancer brain metastases (BCBM). 11p15 aberration patterns were assessed by allelic imbalance (AI) analysis in primary BC (n = 78), BCBM (n = 21) and metastases from other distant sites (n = 6) using six different markers. AI at 11p15 was significantly associated with BCBM (p = 0.002). Interestingly, a subgroup of primary BC with a later relapse to the brain had almost equally high AI rates as the BCBM cases. In primary BC, AI was statistically significantly associated with high grade, negative hormone receptor status, and triple-negative (TNBC) tumors. Gene expression profiling identified PRKCDBP in the 11p15 region to be significantly downregulated in both BCBM and primary BC with brain relapse compared to primary tumors without relapse or bone metastasis (fdr<0.05). qRT-PCR confirmed these results and methylation was shown to be a common way to silence this gene. In conclusion, we found loss at 11p15 to be a marker for TNBC primary tumors and BCBM and PRKCDBP to be a potential target gene in this locus.     

Alterations of expression level of RASSFIA gene in primary epithelial tumors of various locations

Tumor-suppressor activity was established for RASSF1A gene by in vitro and in vivo including studies of knock-out mutated mice cells. Data on methylation of promoter region and expression decrease revealed mainly in cancer cell lines were reported. Here, analysis of RASSF1A mRNA quantity was performed for the first time in primary epithelial malignant tumors of five various locations from 130 patients by semi-quantitative RT-PCR. Representative sets of kidney, lung and breast carcinomas samples were studied. Preliminary data for RASSF1A expression in ovarian and colorectal carcinomas are also reported. Our system studies showed unexpected expression profiles, namely mRNA level increase more frequently (2-7 times) than decrease in renal, breast, ovarian, and colorectal carcinomas. Increasing RASSF1A mRNA level was revealed significantly more frequently in renal cell carcinoma (24/38, 63% vs. 8/38, 21%, P = 0.0004, by Fisher exact test) and ovarian carcinomas (8/13, 62% vs. 2/13, 15%, P = 0.0114). Only in non-small cell lung cancer decreasing and increasing of RASSF1A expression were observed with equal frequency (16/38, 42%). Noteworthy, for early clinical stages prevalence of increasing expression both in squamous cell lung cancer and in adenocarcinoma was revealed, and for advanced clinical stages evident prevalence of decreasing RASSF1A expression was established. Cases with increasing expression both in early and advanced stages of clear cell renal cell carcinoma were in prevalence, in advanced stages it was proved significantly (P = 0.0094). These data suggested that RASSF1A expression alterations were tumor specific. Mentioned above regularity could point onto ambivalent RASSF1A functions in tumors--a tumor-suppressor gene and a proto-oncogene as well.     

Statistical validation of the mammaglobin-nested RT-PCR assay for tumor cell detection in blood of breast cancer patients.

A stochastic model was developed to validate the results obtained with the mammaglobin-nested RT-PCR assay for tumor cell detection in peripheral blood of breast cancer patients. Since the assay consists of four PCR setups per peripheral blood sample, the probabilities for receiving 0, 1, 2, 3, or 4 positive setups were calculated. In this model, samples with just 500 mammaglobin mRNA molecules are highly probable to result in at least three positive setups, whereas lower quantities shift the probabilities towards one or two positive setups. In the clinical trial, samples with one or two mammaglobin positive setups were detected in 6/143 (4%) patients with benign lesions of the breast, in 41/310 (13%) breast cancer patients with no evidence of disease and in 39/157 (25%) breast cancer patients with metastatic disease. On the contrary, no sample from patients with benign lesions of the breast resulted in three or four positive setups, but 5/310 (2%) breast cancer patients with no evidence of disease and 46/157 (29%) with metastatic disease. These results correspond with the model: an increased number of tumor cells in peripheral blood lead to a higher amount of mammaglobin mRNA molecules, and these samples may result in at least three positive setups. Samples with three orfour positive setups were mainly derived from breast cancer patients with metastatic disease and only occasionally from patients with no evidence of disease. On account of these results, samples with at least three positive setups are of prognostic value and regarded as tumor cell positive.     

ErbB-receptors expression and survival in breast carcinoma: a 15-year follow-up study

Aberrant expression of the epidermal growth factor receptor family has been implicated in the pathogenesis and progression of breast cancer and associated with poor prognosis. To evaluate the prognostic impact of the ErbB receptors expression profile, we analyzed a well-characterized series of 145 primary breast carcinomas for the simultaneous expression of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR/HER-1), ErbB-2 (HER-2), ErbB-3 (HER-3), and ErbB-4 (HER-4), using immunohistochemistry. Tumors were considered negative or positive for each marker when less than or more than 25% of the cancer cells were immunopositive. Expression of EGFR, ErbB-2, ErbB-3, and ErbB-4 was observed in 31 (21.4%), 65 (44.8%), 72 (49.7%), and 81 (55.9%) of the cases, respectively. There were significant associations between EGFR expression and pT status (P = 0.01), and between ErbB-3 expression and pN (P = 0.003), menopausal (P = 0.01) and PR (P < 0.001) status. The majority of the cases co-expressed two or more receptors. ErbB-3 resulted positive in 51/81 (63.0%) of the ErbB-4 positive cases and ErbB-3/ErbB-4 co-expression was statistically significant (P = 0.0003). As expected, ErbB-2 expression was associated with reduced overall survival at 15 years of follow-up (P = 0.04), even after adjusting for a series of other prognostic factors (P = 0.05). Moreover, cumulative analysis of ErbB-2/3/4 expression showed a strong positive association between higher total ErbB-2/3/4 expression score and worse prognosis (P = 0.002). The simultaneous expression in cancer cells of more than one ErbB receptor identifies a subset of breast cancer patients at high risk for poor survival.     

The G Protein-Coupled Estrogen Receptor (GPER) Is Expressed in Two Different Subcellular Localizations Reflecting Distinct Tumor Properties in Breast Cancer

Introduction

The G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER) is a novel estrogen receptor that mediates proliferative effects induced by estrogen but also by tamoxifen. The aim of our study was to analyze the frequency of GPER in a large collective of primary invasive breast carcinomas, with special emphasis on the subcellular expression and to evaluate the association with clinicopathological parameters and patient overall survival.

Methods

The tissue microarrays from formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded samples of primary invasive breast carcinomas (n = 981) were analyzed for GPER expression using immunohistochemistry. Expression data were compared to the clinicopathological parameters and overall survival. GPER localization was also analyzed in two immortalized breast cancer cell lines T47D and MCF7 by confocal immunofluorescence microscopy.

Results

A predominantly cytoplasmic GPER expression was found in 189 carcinomas (19.3%), whereas a predominantly nuclear expression was observed in 529 cases (53.9%). A simultaneous comparable positive expression of both patterns was found in 32 of 981 cases (3.2%), and negative staining was detected in 295 cases (30%). Confocal microscopy confirmed the occurrence of cytoplasmic and nuclear GPER expression in T47D and MCF7. Cytoplasmic GPER expression was significantly associated with non-ductal histologic subtypes, low tumor stage, better histologic differentiation, as well as Luminal A and B subtypes. In contrast, nuclear GPER expression was significantly associated with poorly differentiated carcinomas and the triple-negative subtype. In univariate analysis, cytoplasmic GPER expression was associated with better overall survival (p = 0.012).

Conclusion

Our data suggest that predominantly cytoplasmic and/or nuclear GPER expression are two distinct immunohistochemical patterns in breast carcinomas and may reflect different biological features, reason why these patterns should be clearly distinguished in histological evaluations. Prospective studies will be needed to assess whether the expression status of GPER in breast carcinomas should be routinely observed by clinicians, for instance, before implementing endocrine breast cancer treatment.