Regulatory non‐coding RNAs in acute myocardial infarction

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is one of the most common cardiovascular diseases that leads to high mortality and morbidity globally. Various therapeutic targets for AMI have been investigated in recent years, including the non‐coding RNAs (ncRNAs). NcRNAs, a class of RNA molecules that typically do not code proteins, are divided into several subgroups. Among them, microRNAs (miRNAs) are widely studied for their modulation of several pathological aspects of AMI, including cardiomyocyte apoptosis, inflammation, angiogenesis and fibrosis. It has emerged that long ncRNAs (lncRNAs) and circular RNAs (circRNAs) also regulate these processes via interesting mechanisms. However, the regulatory functions of ncRNAs in AMI and their underlying functional mechanisms have not been systematically described. In this review, we summarize the recent findings involving ncRNA actions in AMI and briefly describe the novel mechanisms of these ncRNAs, highlighting their potential application as therapeutic targets in AMI.     

microRNAs and long non‐coding RNAs as biomarkers for polycystic ovary syndrome

Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is known as the most common metabolic/endocrine disorder among women of reproductive age. Its complicated causality assessment and diagnostic emphasized the role of non‐coding regulatory RNAs as molecular biomarkers in studying, diagnosing and even as therapeutics of PCOS. This review discusses a comparative summary of research into microRNAs (miRNAs) and long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs) that are molecularly or statistically related to PCOS. We categorize the literature in terms of centering on either miRNAs or lncRNAs and discuss the combinatory studies and promising ideas as well. Additionally, we compare the pros and cons of the prominent research methodologies used for each of the abovementioned research themes and discuss how errors can be stopped from propagation by selecting correct methodologies for future research. Finally, it can be concluded that research into miRNAs and lncRNAs has the potential for identifying functional networks of regulation with multiple mRNAs (and hence, functional proteins). This new understanding may eventually afford clinicians to control the molecular course of the pathogenesis better. With further research, RNA (with statistical significance and present in the blood) may be used as biomarkers for the disease, and more possibilities for RNA therapy agents can be identified.     

非编码RNA在肿瘤细胞糖代谢中的调控作用

非编码RNA(non-coding RNA,ncRNA)是一类不具有蛋白质编码潜能的RNA,可分为管家ncRNA和调控性ncRNA。微RNA(microRNA,miRNA)是研究得比较清楚的一类调控性ncRNA,不仅可调控细胞分化、增殖和凋亡,还可通过调节糖酵解途径中的限速酶［如己糖激酶(hexokinase,HK)、磷酸果糖激酶(phosphofructokinase, PFK)和丙酮酸激酶(pyruvate kinase, PK)］来调控肿瘤细胞的糖代谢。长链非编码RNA(long non-coding RNA, lncRNA)是另一类近年来引起重视的调控性ncRNA,它们可通过调节癌基因c Myc、葡糖转运蛋白(glucose transporter, GLUT)、HK和缺氧诱导因子等来调控肿瘤细胞的糖代谢。深入了解miRNA和lncRNA等调控性ncRNA调控肿瘤细胞糖代谢的机制不仅可以使我们更加深入地了解肿瘤的发生机制,而且可能为肿瘤的预防、诊断和治疗提供新方向。     

The latest progress on miR‐374 and its functional implications in physiological and pathological processes

Non‐coding RNAs (ncRNAs) have been emerging players in cell development, differentiation, proliferation and apoptosis. Based on their differences in length and structure, they are subdivided into several categories including long non‐coding RNAs (lncRNAs >200nt), stable non‐coding RNAs (60‐300nt), microRNAs (miRs or miRNAs, 18‐24nt), circular RNAs, piwi‐interacting RNAs (26‐31nt) and small interfering RNAs (about 21nt). Therein, miRNAs not only directly regulate gene expression through pairing of nucleotide bases between the miRNA sequence and a specific mRNA that leads to the translational repression or degradation of the target mRNA, but also indirectly affect the function of downstream genes through interactions with lncRNAs and circRNAs. The latest studies have highlighted their importance in physiological and pathological processes. MiR‐374 family member are located at the X‐chromosome inactivation center. In recent years, numerous researches have uncovered that miR‐374 family members play an indispensable regulatory role, such as in reproductive disorders, cell growth and differentiation, calcium handling in the kidney, various cancers and epilepsy. In this review, we mainly focus on the role of miR‐374 family members in multiple physiological and pathological processes. More specifically, we also summarize their promising potential as novel prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets from bench to bedside.     

Small non‐coding RNA and colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common malignance. Although great efforts have been made to understand the pathogenesis of CRC, the underlying mechanisms are still unclear. It is now clear that more than 90% of the total genome is actively transcribed, but lack of protein‐coding potential. The massive amount of RNA can be classified as housekeeping RNAs (such as ribosomal RNAs, transfer RNAs) and regulatory RNAs (such as microRNAs [miRNAs], PIWI‐interacting RNA [piRNAs], tRNA‐derived stress‐induced RNA, tRNA‐derived small RNA [tRFs] and long non‐coding RNAs [lncRNAs]). Small non‐coding RNAs are a group of ncRNAs with the length no more than 200 nt and they have been found to exert important regulatory functions under many pathological conditions. In this review, we summarize the biogenesis and functions of regulatory sncRNAs, such as miRNAs, piRNA and tRFs, and highlight their involvements in cancers, particularly in CRC.     

New insights into the role of microRNAs and long noncoding RNAs in most common neurodegenerative diseases

Neurodegenerative diseases (NDs) are a diversity of neurological disorders characterized by the progressive degeneration of the structure and function of the central nervous system (CNS). The most common NDs are Alzheimer's disease (AD), Parkinson's disease (PD), and Huntington's disease (HD). Recently, many studies have investigated associations between common NDs with noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) molecules. ncRNAs are regulatory molecules in the normal functioning of the CNS. Two of the most important ncRNAs are microRNAs (miRNAs) and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). These types of ncRNAs are involved in different biological processes including brain development, maturation, differentiation, neuronal cell specification, neurogenesis, and neurotransmission. Increasing data has demonstrated that miRNAs and lncRNAs have strong correlations with the development of NDs, particularly gene expression. Besides, ncRNAs can be introduced as new biomarkers for diagnosis and prognosis of NDs. Hence, in this review, we summarized the involvement of various miRNAs and lncRNAs in most common NDs followed by a correlation of ncRNAs dysregulation with the AD, PD, and HD.     

Non-coding RNAs: Functional roles in the regulation of stress response in Brassica crops

Brassica crops face a combination of different abiotic and biotic stresses in the field that can reduce plant growth and development by affecting biochemical and morpho-physiological processes. Emerging evidence suggests that non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs), especially microRNAs (miRNAs) and long ncRNAs (lncRNAs), play a significant role in the modulation of gene expression in response to plant stresses. Recent advances in computational and experimental approaches are of great interest for identifying and functionally characterizing ncRNAs. While progress in this field is limited, numerous ncRNAs involved in the regulation of gene expression in response to stress have been reported in Brassica. In this review, we summarize the modes of action and functions of stress-related miRNAs and lncRNAs in Brassica as well as the approaches used to identify ncRNAs.     

Role of Non-coding RNAs in Axon Regeneration after Peripheral Nerve Injury

Peripheral nerve injury (PNI) may lead to disability and neuropathic pain, which constitutes a substantial economic burden to patients and society. It was found that the peripheral nervous system (PNS) has the ability to regenerate after injury due to a permissive microenvironment mainly provided by Schwann cells (SCs) and the intrinsic growth capacity of neurons; however, the results of injury repair are not always satisfactory. Effective, long-distance axon regeneration after PNI is achieved by precise regulation of gene expression. Numerous studies have shown that in the process of peripheral nerve damage and repair, differential expression of non-coding RNAs (ncRNAs) significantly affects axon regeneration, especially expression of microRNAs (miRNAs), long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) and circular RNAs (circRNAs). In the present article, we review the cellular and molecular mechanisms of axon regeneration after PNI, and analyze the roles of these ncRNAs in nerve repair. In addition, we discuss the characteristics and functions of these ncRNAs. Finally, we provide a thorough perspective on the functional mechanisms of ncRNAs in nervous injury repair, and explore the potential these ncRNAs offer as targets of nerve injury treatment.     

Construction of lncRNA-associated ceRNA networks to identify prognostic lncRNA biomarkers for glioblastoma

Long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) serve as competitive endogenous RNAs (ceRNAs) that play significant regulatory roles in the pathogenesis of tumors. However, the role of lncRNAs, especially the lncRNA-related ceRNA regulatory network, in glioblastoma (GBM) has not been fully elucidated. The goal of the current study was to construct lncRNA-microRNA-mRNA-related ceRNA networks for further investigation of their mechanism of action in GBM. We downloaded data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases and identified differential lncRNAs, microRNAs (miRNAs), and messenger RNAs (mRNAs) associated with GBM. A ceRNA network was constructed and analyzed to examine the relationship between lncRNAs and patients’ overall survival. Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGGs) were used to analyze the related mRNAs to indirectly explain the mechanism of action of lncRNAs. The potential effective drugs for the treatment of GBM were identified using the connectivity map (CMap). After integrated analysis, we obtained a total of 210 differentially expressed lncRNAs, 90 differentially expressed miRNAs, and 2508 differentially expressed mRNAs (DEmRNAs) from the TCGA and GEO databases. Using these differential genes, we constructed a lncRNA-associated ceRNA network. Six lncRNAs in the ceRNA network were associated with the overall survival of patients with GBM. Through KEGG analysis, it was found that the DEmRNAs involved in the network are related to cancer-associated pathways, for instance, mitogen-activated protein kinase and Ras signaling pathways. CMap analysis revealed four small-molecule compounds that could be used as drugs for the treatment of GBM. In this study, a multi-database joint analysis was used to construct a lncRNA-related ceRNA network to help identify the regulatory functions of lncRNAs in the pathogenesis of GBM.     

Competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA) cross talk and language in ceRNA regulatory networks: A new look at hallmarks of breast cancer

Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently occurring malignancy in women worldwide. Despite the substantial advancement in understanding the molecular mechanisms and management of BC, it remains the leading cause of cancer death in women. One of the main reasons for this obstacle is that we have not been able to find the Achilles heel for the BC as a highly heterogeneous disease. Accumulating evidence has revealed that noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), play key roles in the development of BC; however, the involving of complex regulatory interactions between the different varieties of ncRNAs in the development of this cancer has been poorly understood. In the recent years, the newly discovered mechanism in the RNA world is “competing endogenous RNA (ceRNA)” which proposes regulatory dialogues between different RNAs, including long ncRNAs (lncRNAs), microRNAs (miRNAs), transcribed pseudogenes, and circular RNAs (circRNAs). In the latest BC research, various studies have revealed that dysregulation of several ceRNA networks (ceRNETs) between these ncRNAs has fundamental roles in establishing the hallmarks of BC development. And it is thought that such a discovery could open a new window for a better understanding of the hidden aspects of breast tumors. Besides, it probably can provide new biomarkers and potential efficient therapeutic targets for BC. This review will discuss the existing body of knowledge regarding the key functions of ceRNETs and then highlights the emerging roles of some recently discovered ceRNETs in several hallmarks of BC. Moreover, we propose for the first time the “ceRnome” as a new term in the present article for RNA research.     

CREB与其相关的非编码RNA在肿瘤发生发展中的作用

cAMP反应元件结合蛋白（cAMP responsive element binding protein, CREB）是亮氨酸拉链家族转录因子。新近研究发现,其在肿瘤组织中的表达显著高于癌旁,被认为是体内的原癌基因之一。非编码RNA（non-coding RNA, ncRNA）是生物体内不能翻译成蛋白质的RNA,主要包括微小RNA（microRNA, miRNA）和长链非编码RNA（long non-coding RNA, lncRNA）等,其异常表达与肿瘤的发生发展密切相关,是目前肿瘤研究的热点。研究表明,CREB与ncRNA之间存在互动效应,并且二者之间的相互作用影响肿瘤的发生发展,然而miRNA和lncRNA的作用机制却不相同。肿瘤细胞内高表达的CREB在影响下游靶基因表达时能够正调控miRNA,而对lncRNA则有促进和抑制两方面的作用。反之,肿瘤细胞中一些低表达的miRNA能促进CREB的表达;有趣的是,高表达的lncRNA能够促进CREB的表达和诱导其活性增强。在影响下游靶基因表达时miRNA仅仅发挥抑制作用,而lncRNA则分别具有促进和抑制作用。本文结合我们的系列报道和最新的研究结果,对ncRNA与CREB的互动效应及其与肿瘤的发生发展之间的关系作一综述。     

Novel insights into the interaction between N6‐methyladenosine methylation and noncoding RNAs in musculoskeletal disorders

BackgroundMusculoskeletal disorder (MSD) are a class of inflammatory and degener‐ative diseases, but the precise molecular mechanisms are still poorly understood. Noncoding RNA (ncRNA) N6‐methyladenosine (m6A) modification plays an essential role in the pathophysiological process of MSD. This review summarized the interaction between m6A RNA methylation and ncRNAs in the molecular regulatory mechanism of MSD. It provides a new perspective for the pathophysiological mechanism and ncRNA m6A targeted therapy of MSD.MethodsA comprehensive search of databases was conducted with musculoskeletal disorders, noncoding RNA, N6‐methyladenosine, intervertebral disc degeneration, osteoporosis, osteosarcoma, osteoarthritis, skeletal muscle, bone, and cartilage as the key‐words. Then, summarized all the relevant articles.ResultsIntervertebral disc degeneration (IDD), osteoporosis (OP), osteosarcoma (OS), and osteoarthritis (OA) are common MSDs that affect muscle, bone, cartilage, and joint, leading to limited movement, pain, and disability. However, the precise pathogenesis remains unclear, and no effective treatment and drug is available at present. Numerous studies confirmed that the mutual regulation between m6A and ncRNAs (i.e., microRNAs, long ncRNAs, and circular RNAs) was found in MSD, m6A modification can regulate ncRNAs, and ncRNAs can also target m6A regulators. ncRNA m6A modification plays an essential role in the pathophysiological process of MSDs by regulating the homeostasis of skeletal muscle, bone, and cartilage.Conclusionm6A interacts with ncRNAs to regulate multiple biological processes and plays important roles in IDD, OP, OS, and OA. These studies provide new insights into the pathophysiological mechanism of MSD and targeting m6A‐modified ncRNAs may be a promising therapy approach.

m6A regulates the expression and function of ncRNAs (i.e., miRNAs, lncRNAs and circRNAs), ncRNAs can also affect m6A‐related protein. m6A‐related proteins in ncRNA are abnormally expressed and closely associated with bone osteogenic, osteoclastogenic processes and myogenesis, participating in modulating the homoeostasis of skeletal muscle, bone and cartilage. ncRNA m6A modification regulates the pathological and physiological processes of musculoskeletal disorders (i.e., IDD, OP, OS and OA). In IDD, ncRNA m6A modification regulated NP cells glucose metabolism, senescence and pyroptosis. In OP, ncRNA m6A modification regulated BMSCs osteogenic differentiation, osteoblast proliferation, differentiation and bone formation. In OS, ncRNA m6A modification regulated OS cells growth, migration, proliferation and apoptosis. In OA, ncRNA m6A modification regulated chondrocyte apoptosis and ECM degradation.     

Screening differential circular RNA expression profiles reveals the regulatory role of circMARS in anti‐tuberculosis drug‐induced liver injury

Tuberculosis (TB) treatment is plagued by liver damage, which often leads to treatment interruptions. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a special class of non‐coding RNAs abundant in body fluids with important biological functions. However, the role of circRNA in anti‐tuberculosis drug‐induced liver injury (ADLI) is unclear. We explored ADLI‐specific circRNAs in TB patients using circRNA microarrays and verified circMARS in a cohort of 300 individuals. In addition to the value assessment of circMARS in patients using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, cell experiments were also performed under the guidance of bioinformatics analyses. In particular, we found that circMARS acts as a miRNA sponge by binding to miRNAs. Compared with the blank group, the expressions of circMARS, KMT2C gene, and EGFR protein in the ADLI group were increased, while miR‐6808‐5p, miR‐6874‐3p, and miR‐3157‐5p were decreased. Furthermore, when si‐circMARS was used in the ADLI groups, circMARS demotion manifested the opposite results. Subsequently, a self‐controlled cohort of 35 participants was used to verify the circMARS–miR‐6808‐5p/‐6874‐3p/‐3157‐5p–KMT2C–EGFR function axis. Therefore, circMARS may participate in the compensatory repair mechanism of ADLI through the function axis, and may be a potential biomarker for ADLI diagnosis in TB patients.     

微小RNA和长链非编码RNA介导的昼夜节律调控

非编码RNA(ncRNA)是生物体细胞内一类重要的调控分子,其介导的昼夜节律调控日益受到研究者的重视。本文主要以黑腹果蝇Drosophila melanogaster和哺乳动物的相关研究为背景,阐述了微小RNA(miRNA)和长链非编码RNA(lncRNA)对昼夜节律的调控。miRNA介导的昼夜节律调控包括:生物体内(尤其是钟神经元中)具有节律性表达的miRNA;输入系统和miRNA存在相互调控,这主要是通过光照这个授时因子起作用;miRNA可直接调控核心振荡器,还可以调控其他基因而间接影响到核心振荡器;miRNA对输出系统的调控主要集中在代谢取食节律、运动节律、睡眠节律等。昼夜节律可调控lncRNA的表达,同时lncRNA也可调控昼夜节律,且lncRNA对基因调控范围广,作用机制复杂,这些都具有广阔的研究前景。本文将有助于进一步深入研究ncRNA对昼夜节律的调控。     

Emerging roles of circular RNAs in neuropathic pain

Neuropathic pain is a major type of chronic pain caused by the disease or injury of the somatosensory nervous system. It afflicts about 10% of the general population with a significant proportion of patients’ refractory to conventional medical treatment. This highlights the importance of a better understanding of the molecular pathogenesis of neuropathic pain so as to drive the development of novel mechanism‐driven therapy. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a type of non‐coding, regulatory RNAs that exhibit tissue‐ and disease‐specific expression. An increasing number of studies reported that circRNAs may play pivotal roles in the development of neuropathic pain. In this review, we first summarize circRNA expression profiling studies on neuropathic pain. We also highlight the molecular mechanisms of specific circRNAs (circHIPK3, circAnks1a, ciRS‐7, cZRANB1, circZNF609 and circ_0005075) that play key functional roles in the pathogenesis of neuropathic pain and discuss their potential diagnostic, prognostic, and therapeutic utilization in the clinical management of neuropathic pain.